2 - Why have a morphology at all?

Summary

This chapter is devoted to the question raised above of whether it makes theoretical sense to distinguish principles of morphology from those of other parts of a grammar. In section 2.1 we will look more closely at the system of a single language, K^wak^w'ala, in which the grammar of words is particularly well developed. Among its many interesting features, K^wak^w'ala allows us to examine the relation between morphology and syntax in some detail, because the language displays at the same time a rich and highly structured syntax, and an equally developed and highly structured system of word formation. When we look closely at the facts in these two domains, we will see that they are governed by rather different principles. The point of such a demonstration in the present context is to show that two quite separate rule systems govern K^wak^w'ala ‘grammar’ (in the generalized sense of ‘morphosyntax’), and that the line between them corresponds to the difference between principles operating within a word and those organizing words into higher-level units.

Following this demonstration that an individual language may distinguish the grammar of words from the syntax of phrases, we consider the issue in more general terms. If we take seriously the suggestion that a system of principles governs the construction of words and their relations within a lexicon, and a different system governs the syntactic structure of phrases, clauses, etc., we would expect some systematic differences to obtain between the two systems.