Group-Conscious Policies: Ethnic Consensus and Cleavage

Jack Citrin; David O. Sears

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139028967.009

7 - Group-Conscious Policies: Ethnic Consensus and Cleavage

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014

Jack Citrin and

David O. Sears

Show author details

Jack Citrin: Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
David O. Sears: Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter turns our attention away from opinions about general norms and principles to preferences regarding the major policy domains highest on the multicultural agenda in the United States. These policies have evoked heated legislative and electoral conflicts, often dividing the main political parties. Due to their visibility, they are more likely than abstract normative questions about descriptive representation or the maintenance of immigrant cultures to have penetrated mass consciousness.

To repeat our starting point, the two overriding purposes of multiculturalism are to redress entrenched political and economic inequalities between racial and ethnic groups and to assure that religious and cultural minorities can survive and flourish in the face of formal and informal pressures to blend in and conform to the mainstream. As articulated in Chapter 1, multiculturalists believe that solutions based on individual rights such as antidiscrimination laws and efforts to provide equality of opportunity are inadequate. Instead, multiculturalism endorses policies that are group-conscious, sometimes explicitly and sometimes only implicitly.

Type: Chapter
Information: American Identity and the Politics of Multiculturalism , pp. 175 - 203

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028967.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sniderman, Paul M. and Piazza, Thomas, The Scar of Race (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Schuck, Peter, Diversity in America: Keeping Government at a Safe Distance (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003), 40–72Google Scholar

Lapinski, John S., Peltola, Pia, Shaw, Greg, and Yang, Alan, “Trends: Immigrants and Immigration,” Public Opinion Quarterly 61 (1997): 356–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Pew Research Center, “America’s Immigration Quandary: No Consensus on Immigration Problem or Proposed Fixes” (2006),

Pearson, Kathryn and Citrin, Jack, “The Political Assimilation of the Fourth Wave,” in Transforming Politics, Transforming America: The Political and Civic Incorporation of Immigrants in the United States, ed. Lee, Taeku, Ramakrishnan, Karthick, and Ramirez, Ricardo (Charlottesville, VA.: University of Virginia Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Schildkraut, Deborah, Press ‘One’ for English: Language Policy, Public Opinion, and American Identity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Sniderman, Paul M., Crosby, Gretchen C., and Howell, William G., “The Politics of Race,” in Racialized Politics: The Debate about Racism in America, ed. Sears, David O., Sidanius, Jim, and Bobo, Lawrence (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 236–79Google Scholar

Bobo, Lawrence and Smith, Ryan A., “Antipoverty Policy, Affirmative Action, and Racial Attitudes,” in Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change, ed. Danziger, Sheldon, Sandefur, Gary D., and Weinberg, Daniel H. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994), 365–95Google Scholar

Bobo, Lawrence and Kluegel, James R., “Opposition to Race-Targeting: Self-Interest, Stratification Ideology, or Racial Attitudes?” American Sociological Review 58 (1993): 443–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Steeh, Charlotte and Krysan, Maria, “Trends: Affirmative Action and the Public, 1970–1995” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1996): 128–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, “America’s Immigration Quandary,” March 30, 2006. Accessed online at

Gallup: Americans More Pro-Immigration Than in Past: ;

Citrin, Jack et al., “Public Opinion toward Immigration: The Role of Economic Motivations,” The Journal of Politics 59, no. 3 (1997): 858–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers, “Civic and Ethnic Nations in France and Germany,” in Ethnicity, ed. Hutchinson, John and Smith, Anthony (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Gallup, 2010: More Americans Favor than Oppose Arizona Immigration Law,

Pew Research Center, 2011: .

Bloomberg News Poll Report, November 2012, accessed online at

Pew Research Center, 2012: .

Thernstrom, Abigail, “Language: Issues and Legislation,” in Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups, ed. Thernstrom, Stephan (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Citrin, Jack et al., “The ‘Official English’ Movement and the Symbolic Politics of Language in the United States,” The Western Political Quarterly 43, no. 3 (1990): 535–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Huddy, Leonie and Sears, David O., “Qualified Public Support for Bilingual Education: Some Policy Implications,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 508 (1990): 119–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Pew Hispanic Center 2011:

Pew Research Center 2012 survey of Asian Americans,

Book contents

7 - Group-Conscious Policies: Ethnic Consensus and Cleavage

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive