Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:22:12.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Constructing the rent index III: other studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

M. E. Turner
Affiliation:
University of Hull
J. V. Beckett
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
B. Afton
Affiliation:
University of Hull
Get access

Summary

Our own analysis of archival material, coupled with the evidence collected by and in connection with the late-nineteenth-century Royal Commission, has provided the greater part of the data from which we have compiled a rent index. However, we commented in an earlier chapter that many large estates, in particular, had been the subjects of biographies. We turn in this chapter to considering whether any of the materials in these studies can be added in a satisfactory way to the database. While any conclusions will be regionally specific (except perhaps in the case of large and scattered estates), the least we can do perhaps is to attempt to build up an impressionistic picture. Since contemporaries were often uncertain about the calculation of rent, there is little likelihood that historians collecting rent material will have acquired data which can easily be compared. None the less it may be that material collected for individual estates across long time spans offers us a way of shadowing a rent index to ensure that we have the correct framework.

For the mass of landowners there is barely the odd estate history to rely on, let alone a collective story to be told. Yet from these individual biographies there are some families and some estates which have been picked over more than once. Potentially we could piece together the longest continuous single series for a family and its estate by splicing together the researches of the several biographers of the Leveson-Gower/Sutherland estates in Staffordshire and Shropshire. Four scholars have worked on the family archive in the production of doctoral theses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×