Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:35:59.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - On the origin of halo assembly bias

from Part II - Co-evolution of black holes and galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Vincenzo Antonuccio-Delogu
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Catania, Italy
Joseph Silk
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Halo assembly bias, the dependence of dark-halo clustering on their formation history, is becoming increasingly important. The reason for this is that a better understanding of the formation of galaxies is needed in order to fully exploit new measurements, which are being developed with increasing precision.

According to the standard cosmological scenario, galaxies are formed in high density regions consisting of virialized dark-matter particles. Such systems, termed dark-matter halos, form in a hierarchical and self-similar fashion, in which smaller objects form first and then continuously merge into ever larger objects. The merging process is not linear, in the sense that it doesn't arise from linear theory. Thus, it defines a time-dependent scale in which matter clustering becomes non-linear.

The theoretical framework describing the process of halo formation is the excursion set theory (Bond et al. 1991; Lacey & Cole 1993; Mo & White 1996). According to this theory, dark-matter density fluctuations, at a given scale, grow in the linear regime until they reach a critical value when they collapse. The collapse process is equivalent to a merging process of the smaller scales. When combined with the theory of random Gaussian fields, this framework explains the formation history of halos. A major result is that the history of a halo should not be correlated with the halo environment. This follows because density fluctuations are not correlated with larger scales. Another way of stating this is that halo history should not be correlated with the clustering of the halos themselves.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×