Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:42:06.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2020

Edited by
Michele M. Betsill ,
Tabitha M. Benney  and
Andrea K. Gerlak
Michele M. Betsill
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Tabitha M. Benney
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Andrea K. Gerlak
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Agency in Earth System Governance , pp. 227 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K. W. (2008). Enriching rational choice institutionalism for the study of international law. University of Illinois Law Review, 1, 5–46.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2012). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. International Affairs, 88(3), 543–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2014). Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(1), 57–88.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., and Bernstein, S. (2015). The high-level political forum on sustainable development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6(3), 222–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W., and Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W., and Snidal, D. (2013). Taking responsive regulation transnational: Strategies for international organizations. Regulation and Governance, 7(1), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adsera, A., Boix, C., and Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19(2), 445–90.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., and Hardin, R. (2008). Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 320(5882), 1460–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, S. M., Andrachuk, M., and Armitage, D. (2016). Navigating governance networks for community-based conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, R. (2004). International Environmental Justice: A North–South Dimension. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Andonova, L. B. (2010). Public–private partnerships for the earth: Politics and patterns of hybrid authority in the multilateral system. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., and Bulkeley, H. (2009). Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 52–73.Google Scholar
Andonova, L. B., and Levy, M. A. (2003). Franchising global governance: Making sense of the Johannesburg type II partnerships. Yearbook of International Cooperation on Environment and Development, 4, 19–31.Google Scholar
Andonova, L. B., and Mitchell, R. B. (2010). The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 255–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrachuk, M., and Armitage, D. (2015). Understanding social-ecological change and transformation through community perceptions of system identity. Ecology and Society, 20(4), http://dx.doi.org/10.5757/ES-07759.200426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrew, J., and Huitema, D. (2014). Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change, 29, 387–94.Google Scholar
Ansell, C., and Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apostolopoulou, E., Bormpoudakis, D., Paloniemi, R., et al. (2014). Governance rescaling and the neoliberalization of nature: The case of biodiversity conservation in four EU countries. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 21(6), 481–94.Google Scholar
Apostolopoulou, E., Drakou, E. G., and Pediaditi, K. (2012). Participation in the management of Greek Natura 2000 sites: Evidence from a cross-level analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 308–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apostolopoulou, E., and Pantis, J. D. (2009). Conceptual gaps in the national strategy for the implementation of the European Natura 2000 conservation policy in Greece. Biological Conservation, 142(1), 221–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, D., Béné, C., Charles, A. T., Johnson, D., and Allison, E. H. (2012). The interplay of well-being and resilience in applying a social-ecological perspective. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 15–32.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., de Loë, R. C., Morris, M., et al. (2015). Science–policy processes for transboundary water governance. Ambio, 44(5), 353–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armitage, D., de Loë, R., and Plummer, R. (2012). Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 5(4), 245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, D., Marschke, M., and Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asenova, D., and Beck, M. (2010). Crucial silences: When accountability met PFI and finance capital. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Ashley, P., and Boyd, W. (2006). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to research in environmental management. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 13(2), 70–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atela, J., Quinn, C., Arhin, A., Duguma, L., and Mbeva, K. (2017). Exploring the agency of Africa in climate change negotiations: The case of REDD+. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(4), 463–82.Google Scholar
Auld, G., Renckens, S., and Cashore, B. (2015). Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control. Regulation and Governance, 9(2), 108–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babon, A., McIntyre, D., Gowae, G. Y., et al. (2014). Advocacy coalitions, REDD+, and forest governance in Papua New Guinea: How likely is transformational change? Ecology and Society, 19(3), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M., and Marsden, G. (2015). Blame games and climate change: Accountability, multi-level governance and carbon management. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(1), 64–88.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2004). Scientisation vs. civic expertise in environmental governance: Eco-feminist, eco-modern and post-modern responses. Environmental Politics, 13(4), 695–714.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi‐stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290–306.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., and Kylsäter, M. (2014). Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public-private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit. Globalizations, 11(3), 331–47.Google Scholar
Bai, X., McAllister, R. R., Beaty, R. M., and Taylor, B. (2010). Urban policy and governance in a global environment: Complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 129–35.Google Scholar
Baird, J., Plummer, R., Haug, C., and Huitema, D. (2014). Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 27, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barau, A. S., and Al Hosani, N. (2015). Prospects of environmental governance in addressing sustainability challenges of seawater desalination industry in the Arabian Gulf. Environmental Science and Policy, 50, 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barau, A. S., and Said, I. (2016). From goodwill to good deals: FELDA land resettlement scheme and the ascendancy of the landless poor in Malaysia. Land Use Policy, 54, 423–31.Google Scholar
Barau, A. S., and Stringer, L. C. (2015). Access to and allocation of ecosystem services in Malaysia’s Pulau Kukup Ramsar site. Ecosystem Services, 16, 167–73.Google Scholar
Barbi, F., and Ferreira, L. D. C. (2014). Risks and political responses to climate change in Brazilian coastal cities. Journal of Risk Research, 17(4), 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskaran, A. (2017). UNESCO Science Report: Towards 2030. Institutions and Economies, 125–127.Google Scholar
Bastakoti, R. C., Gupta, J., Babel, M. S., and van Dijk, M. P. (2014). Climate risks and adaptation strategies in the lower Mekong River basin. Regional Environmental Change, 14(1), 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastakoti, R. C., Shivakoti, G. P., and Lebel, L. (2010). Local irrigation management institutions mediate changes driven by external policy and market pressures in Nepal and Thailand. Environmental Management, 46(3), 411–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beach, D. (2018). Achieving methodological alignment when combining QCA and process tracing in practice. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 64–99.Google Scholar
Beach, D., and Pedersen, R. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Behnam, M., and MacLean, T. L. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 45–72.Google Scholar
Bell, S., and Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benecke, E. (2011). Networking for climate change: Agency in the context of renewable energy governance in India. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics, 11(1), 23–42.Google Scholar
Benney, T. (2015). Making Environmental Markets Work: The Varieties of Capitalism in Emerging Economies. New York, NY: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Berardo, R., Heikkila, T., and Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Interorganizational engagement in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 697–719.Google Scholar
Bergsma, E., Gupta, J., and Jong, P. (2012). Does individual responsibility increase the adaptive capacity of society? The case of local water management in the Netherlands. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 64(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.Google Scholar
Bernauer, T., and Betzold, C. (2012). Civil society in global environmental governance. Journal of Environment and Development, 21(1), 62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2000). Ideas, social structure and the compromise of liberal environmentalism. European Journal of International Relations, 6(4), 464–512.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2004). Legitimacy in global environmental governance. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1, 139–66.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S., and Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88(3), 585–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S., and Hoffmann, M. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 189–211.Google Scholar
Betsill, M. M. (2014). Transnational Actors in International Environmental Politics. In Betsill, M. M., Hochstetler, K., and Stevis, D. (eds.), Advances in International Environmental Politics, 2nd ed., pp. 185–210. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Betsill, M. M., and Bulkeley, H. (2004). Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The cities for climate protection program. International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 471–93.Google Scholar
Betsill, M. M., and Corell, E., eds. (2008). NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Betsill, M. M., Dubash, N. K., Paterson, M., van Asselt, H., Vihma, A., and Winkler, H. (2015). Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Betsill, M. M., Pattberg, P., and Dellas, E. (2011). Editorial: Agency in earth systems governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettini, Y., Brown, R. R., and de Haan, F. J. (2015). Exploring institutional adaptive capacity in practice: Examining water governance adaptation in Australia. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 47.Google Scholar
Betzold, C., Bernauer, T., and Koubi, V. (2016). Press briefings in international climate change negotiations. Environmental Communication, 10 (5), 575–92.Google Scholar
Beunen, R., and Patterson, J. (2016). Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: Exploring the concept of ‘institutional work.’ Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–18.Google Scholar
Beunen, R., Patterson, J., and Van Assche, K. (2017). Governing for resilience: The role of institutional work. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F. (2007). ‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 326–37.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2010). Beyond the intergovernmental regime: Recent trends in global carbon governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(4), 284–8.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., et al. (2012). Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: Key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., Bai, X., Bondre, N., et al. (2016). Down to earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 39, 341–50.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., et al. (2010a). Earth system governance: A research framework. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 277–98.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., et al. (2009). Earth System Governance: People, Places, and the Planet. A Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Earth System Governance Project Report No. 1. IHDP Report No. 20. Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Vieira, S. C., et al. (2010b). Navigating the Anthropocene: The Earth System Governance Project strategy paper. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 202–8.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., and Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1856–64.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., and Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–94.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., and Siebenhüner, B., eds. (2009a). International Organizations in Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., and Siebenhüner, B., eds. (2009b). Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, R., Westley, F., and Carpenter, S. (2010). Navigating the back loop: Fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bixler, R. P. (2014). From community forest management to polycentric governance: Assessing evidence from the bottom. Society and Natural Resources, 27(2), 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
Blaney, D., and Inayatullah, N. (2008). International relations from below. In Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, pp. 663–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodin, O., and Osterblom, H. (2013). International fisheries regime effectiveness activities and resources of key actors in the Southern Ocean. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 948–56.Google Scholar
Böhmelt, T., and Betzold, C. (2013). The impact of environmental interest groups in international negotiations: Do ENGOs induce stronger environmental commitments? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(2), 127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bork, T., Kraas, F., and Yuan, Y. (2011). Governance challenges in China’s urban health care system – The role of stakeholders. Erdkunde, 65(2), 121–35.Google Scholar
Börzel, T., and Risse, T. (2015). Dysfunctional state institutions, trust, and governance in areas of limited statehood. Regulation & Governance, 10(2), 149–60.Google Scholar
Bouteligier, S. (2011). Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth system governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 43–61.Google Scholar
Bovaird, T. (2005). Public governance: Balancing stakeholder power in a network society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M. (2014). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. In Curtin, D., Mair, P., and Papadopoulos, Y. (eds.), Accountability and European Governance, pp. 28–49. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., and Hart, P. T. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, K. J., Ebi, K., Friel, S., and McMichael, A. J. (2013). A multi layered governance framework for incorporating social science insights into adapting to the health impacts of climate change. Global Health Action, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.21820Google Scholar
Bowen, K. J., Miller, F. P., Dany, V., and Graham, S. (2015). The relevance of a coproductive capacity framework to climate change adaptation: Investigating the health and water sectors in Cambodia. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 13–24.Google Scholar
Breitmeier, H. A., Underdal, A., and Young, O. R. (2011). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Comparing and contrasting findings from quantitative research. International Studies Review, 13(4), 579–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, E., and Wamsler, C. (2018). Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation: Mapping citizen-municipality interactions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(2), 82–97.Google Scholar
Brisbois, M. C., and de Loë, R. C. (2015). Power in collaborative approaches to governance for water: A systematic review. Society & Natural Resources, 29(7), 1–16.Google Scholar
Brisbois, M. C., and de Loë, R. C. (2016). State roles and motivations in collaborative approaches to water governance: A power theory-based analysis. Geoforum, 74, 202–12.Google Scholar
Broadbent, J., and Laughlin, R. (2003). Public private partnerships: An introduction. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(3), 332–41.Google Scholar
Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., and Mardiah, S. (2014). Governing the design of national REDD+: An analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 23–33.Google Scholar
Brockhaus, M., Djoudi, H., and Kambire, H. (2012). Multi-level governance and adaptive capacity in West Africa. International Journal of the Commons, 6(2), 200–32.Google Scholar
Brouwer, S., and Huitema, D. (2017). Policy entrepreneurs and strategies for change. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1259–72.Google Scholar
Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., and Lessidrenska, T. (2009). The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., and Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571–80.Google Scholar
Brown, J. C., and Purcell, M. (2005). There’s nothing inherent about scale: Political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon. Geoforum, 36(5), 607–24.Google Scholar
Brown, K., and Westaway, E. (2011). Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: Lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 321–42.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H. (2012). Governance and the geography of authority: Modalities of authorisation and the transnational governing of climate change. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2428–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Bäckstrand, K., et al. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 591–612.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., et al. (2014). Transnational Climate Change Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Carmin, J., Castán Broto, V., Edwards, G. A. S., and Fuller, S. (2013). Climate justice and global cities: Mapping the emerging discourses. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 914–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., and Maassen, A. (2013). Low-carbon transitions and the reconfiguration of urban infrastructure. Urban Studies, 51(7), 1471–86.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Luque-Ayala, A., and Silver, J. (2014). Housing and the (re)configuration of energy provision in Cape Town and Sao Paulo: Making space for a progressive urban climate politics? Political Geography, 40, 25–34.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., and Schroeder, H. (2012). Beyond state/non-state divides: Global cities and the governing of climate change. European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), 743–66.Google Scholar
Burch, S., Schroeder, H., Rayner, S., and Wilson, J. (2013). Novel multisector networks and entrepreneurship: The role of small businesses in the multilevel governance of climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 822–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, B. J., and Heynen, N. (2014). Transforming participatory science into socioecological praxis. Environment and Society, 5(1), 7–27.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. (2004). From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cadman, T., and Maraseni, T. (2013). More equal than others? A comparative analysis of state and non-state perceptions of interest representation and decision-making in REDD+ negotiations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 214–30.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. Gregory, K. A., Patterson, D., and Bybee, D. (2015). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A case example of mixed methods research in community psychology. In Jason, L. A. and Glenwick, D. S. (eds.), Methodological Approaches to Community-Based Research, pp. 51–68. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Carlsson, I., and Ramphal, S., eds. (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2).Google Scholar
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., et al. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100(14), 8086–91.Google Scholar
Cashmore, M., Richardson, T., Rozema, J., and Lyhne, I. (2015). Environmental governance through guidance: The ‘making up’ of expert practitioners. Geoforum, 62, 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non–state market–driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule–making authority. Governance, 15(4), 503–29.Google Scholar
Castán Broto, V., and Bulkeley, H. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 92–102.Google Scholar
Certomà, C. (2015). Expanding the ‘dark side of planning’: Governmentality and biopolitics in urban garden planning. Planning Theory, 14(1), 23–43.Google Scholar
Chan, S., Brandi, C., and Bauer, S. (2016). The new impacts of the implementation of climate change response measures. Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law, 25(2), 238–47.Google Scholar
Chan, S., and Pattberg, P. (2008). Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: Analyzing global forest governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 103–21.Google Scholar
Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T., et al. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6(4), 466–73.Google Scholar
Chapin, M. (2004). A challenge to conservationists. Can we protect natural habitats without abusing the people who live in them? World Watch, 17, 7–31.Google Scholar
Chappin, M. M. H., Vermeulen, W. J. V., Meeus, M. T. H., and Hekkert, M. P. (2009). Enhancing our understanding of the role of environmental policy in environmental innovation: Adoption explained by the accumulation of policy instruments and agent-based factors. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(7), 934–47.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. S., Gerlak, A. K., Dale, L., and Mattor, K. (2015). Examining the adaptability of collaborative governance associated with publicly managed ecosystems over time: Insights from the Front Range Roundtable, Colorado, USA. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 35.Google Scholar
Chhatre, A., and Agrawal, A. (2009). Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106(42), 17667–70.Google Scholar
Clapp, J. (1998). The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 14000 and the developing world. Global Governance, 4, 295–316.Google Scholar
Clapp, J., and Fuchs, D. A., eds. (2009). Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clapp, J., and Helleiner, E. (2012). Troubled futures? The global food crisis and the politics of agricultural derivatives regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 19(2), 181–207.Google Scholar
Clare, S., Krogman, N., and Caine, K. J. (2013). The “balance discourse”: A case study of power and wetland management. Geoforum, 49, 40–9.Google Scholar
Coffey, A., and Atkinson, P. (1996). Making Sense of Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. L. (1987). Distributive justice: Theory and research. Social Justice Research, 1(1), 19–40.Google Scholar
Colander, D., Goldberg, M., Haas, A., et al. (2009). The financial crisis and the systemic failure of the economics profession. Critical Review, 21(2–3), 249–67.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. A. (1997). Authority, power, leadership: Sociological understandings. New Theology Review, 10(3), 31–44.Google Scholar
Colgan, J. D., and Van de Graaf, T. (2015). Mechanisms of informal governance: Evidence from the IEA. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(4), 455–81.Google Scholar
Considine, M. (2002) The end of the line? Accountable governance in the age of networks, partnerships, and joined-up services. Governance, 15(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
Conway, D., Barnett, J., Betsill, M. M., Lebel, L., and Seto, K. C. (2014). Global environmental change: Taking stock at a time of transition. Global Environmental Change, 25, 1–4.Google Scholar
Cook, H. F., Benson., D., Inman, A., Jordan, A., and Smith, L. (2012). Catchment management groups in England and Wales: Extent, roles and influences. Water and Environment Journal, 26(1), 47–55.Google Scholar
Cooke, B., and Kothari, U., eds. (2007). Participation: The New Tyranny? 4th ed. London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Coolsaet, B., and Pitseys, J. (2015). Fair and equitable negotiations? African influence and the international access and benefit-sharing regime. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 38–56.Google Scholar
Corbera, E., and Jover, N. (2012). The undelivered promises of the Clean Development Mechanism: Insights from three projects in Mexico. Carbon Management, 3(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
Corbera, E., and Schroeder, H. (2011). Governing and Implementing REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, B., Kasmidi, M., Korompis, F., and Pollnac, R. B. (2006). Factors influencing progress in establishing community-based marine protected areas in Indonesia. Coastal Management, 34(1), 39–64.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–15.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, P., and Clapp, J. (2016). Researching global environmental politics in the 21st century. Global Environmental Politics, 16(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Davidson, S. L., and de Loë, R. C. (2016). The changing role of ENGOs in water governance: Institutional entrepreneurs? Environmental Management, 57(1), 62–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Defeo, O., Castrejon, M., Perez-Castaneda, R., et al. (2016). Co-management in Latin American small-scale shellfisheries: Assessment from long-term case studies. Fish and Fisheries, 17(1), 176–92.Google Scholar
de Jong, A. A., Runhaar, H. A., Runhaar, P. R., Kolhoff, A. J., and Driessen, P. P. (2012). Promoting system-level learning from project-level lessons: An analysis of donor-driven ‘indirect’ learning about EIA systems in Ghana and the Maldives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33(1), 23–31.Google Scholar
de la Plaza Esteban, C., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., and de Jong, W. (2014). The legitimacy of certification standards in climate change governance. Sustainable Development, 22(6), 420–32.Google Scholar
Dellas, E., Pattberg, P., and Betsill, M. M. (2011). Agency in earth system governance: Refining a research agenda. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Loë, R. C., Murray, D., and Brisbois, M. C. (2016). Perspectives of natural resource sector firms on collaborative approaches to governance for water. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1117–28.Google Scholar
Demirag, I., Dubnick, M., and Khadaroo, M. A. (2004). Framework for examining accountability and value for money in the UK’s Private Finance Initiative. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 15, 63–76.Google Scholar
den Hond, F., de Bakker, F. G. A., and Doh, J. (2015). What prompts companies to collaboration with NGOs? Recent evidence from the Netherlands. Business & Society, 54(2), 187–228.Google Scholar
Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V., and Schouten, G. (2018). Harnessing wicked problems in multi-stakeholder partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 333–56.Google Scholar
Di Lucia, L., and Kronsell, A. (2010). The willing, the unwilling and the unable – explaining implementation of the EU Biofuels Directive. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 545–63.Google Scholar
Dimento, J. (2015). Laudato si’. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 57, 9–11.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K. (2005). The democratic legitimacy of public-private rule making: What can we learn from the World Commission on Dams?” Global Governance, 11(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy, Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K., and Pattberg, P. (2009). World politics and organizational fields: The case of transnational sustainability governance. European Journal of International Relations, 15(4), 707–43.Google Scholar
Djalante, R., Thomalla, F., Sinapoy, M. S., and Carnegie, M. (2012). Building resilience to natural hazards in Indonesia: Progress and challenges in implementing the Hyogo Framework for Action. Natural Hazards, 62(3), 779–803.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, K. (2010). Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 397–416.Google Scholar
Dore, J., and Lebel, L. (2010). Deliberation and scale in Mekong region water governance. Environmental Management, 46(1), 60–80.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (2016). Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a changing earth system. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 937–56.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., and Pickering, J. (2018). The Politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., and Stevenson, H. (2011). Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics. 70(11), 1865–74.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., and Tucker, A. (2008). Deliberative innovation to different effect: Consensus conferences in Denmark, France, and the United States. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 864–76.Google Scholar
Dunlop, T., and Corbera, E. (2016). Incentivizing REDD+: How developing countries are laying the groundwork for benefit-sharing. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 44–54.Google Scholar
Durant, R. F., Fiorino, D. J., and O’Leary, R. (2016). Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duyck, S. (2015). Promoting the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums: The case of the UN Climate Change Regime. Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law, 24(2), 123–38.Google Scholar
Dzebo, A., and Stripple, J. (2015). Transnational adaptation governance: An emerging fourth era of adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 423–35.Google Scholar
Earth System Governance Project. (2018a). Earth System Governance. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Utrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Earth System Governance Project. (2018b). Earth System Governance Network Information. Version, June 2018.Google Scholar
Eberlein, B., Abbott, K. W., Black, J., Meidinger, E., and Wood, S. (2014). Transnational business governance interactions: Conceptualization and framework for analysis. Regulation & Governance, 8, 1–21.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. N. (2010). A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eimer, T. R. (2014). Philosopher-kings in real life: The epistemic community on biodiversity in Brazil and India. Global Society, 28(2), 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1989). Structure and history: Introductory observations. International Political Science Review, 10(2), 99–110.Google Scholar
Ellison, S. F., and Wallace, M. P. (2014). Diversity, social goods provision, and performance in the firm. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 23(2), 465–81.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.Google Scholar
Engel-Di Mauro, S. (2009). Seeing the local in the global: Political ecologies, world-systems, and the question of scale. Geoforum, 40(1), 116–25.Google Scholar
Evans, J. P. (2012). Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Falkner, R. (2003). Private environmental governance and international relations: Exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 72–87.Google Scholar
Falkner, R. (2012). Business and global climate governance: A neo-pluralist perspective. In Ougaard, M. and Leander, A. (eds.), Business and Global Governance, pp. 115–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Falkner, R., and Buzan, R. (2017). The emergence of environmental stewardship as a primary institution of global international society. European Journal of International Relations, 25(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Faubion, J. D., ed. (1994). Michael Foucault, Power: The Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., and Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62.Google Scholar
Feitelson, E., and Fischhendler, I. (2009). Spaces of water governance: The case of Israel and its neighbors. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 728–45.Google Scholar
Few, R., Brown, K., and Tompkins, E. L. (2011). Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7(1), 46–59.Google Scholar
Finnemore, M., and Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, M., and Leifeld, P. (2015). Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for? Policy Sciences, 48(3), 363–82.Google Scholar
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–82.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N., and McAdam, D. (2012). A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Florini, A., ed. (2007). The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–4.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2004). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–73.Google Scholar
Forsyth, T. (2004). Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2000). The subject and power. In Faubion, J. D. (ed.), Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. III, pp. 326–48. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Francis, P. (2015). Laudato si: On Care for our Common Home. Vatican City: Our Sunday Visitor.Google Scholar
Freed, S., Dujon, V., Granek, E. F., and Mouhhidine, J. (2016). Enhancing small-scale fisheries management through community engagement and multi-community partnerships: Comoros case study. Marine Policy, 63, 81–91.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., and Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 353–67.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, T., Hyakumura, K., Henry, S., and Cadman, T. (2016). Does REDD+ Ensure sectoral coordination and stakeholder participation? A comparative analysis of REDD+ national governance structures in countries of Asia-Pacific Region. Forests, 7 (9), 1–17.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gabrielsson, S., and Ramasar, V. (2013). Widows: Agents of change in a climate of water uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60, 34–42.Google Scholar
Galaz, V. (2014). Global Environmental Governance, Technology and Politics: The Anthropocene Gap. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Galaz, V., Biermann, F., Crona, B., et al. (2012a). ‘Planetary boundaries’—exploring the challenges for global environmental governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 80–7.Google Scholar
Galaz, V., Biermann, F., Folke, C., Nilsson, M., and Olsson, P. (2012). Global environmental governance and planetary boundaries: An introduction. Ecological Economics, 81, 1–3.Google Scholar
Galaz, V., Österblom, H., Bodin, Ö., and Crona, B. (2016). Global networks and global change-Induced tipping points. International Environmental Agreements, 16(2), 189–221.Google Scholar
Gallemore, C., Di Gregorio, M., Moeliono, M., Brockhaus, M., and Prasti, H. R. D. (2015). Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 114, 168–79.Google Scholar
Gallemore, C., and Jespersen, K. (2016). Transnational markets for sustainable development governance: The case of REDD+. World Development, 86, 79–94.Google Scholar
Gallemore, C., and Munroe, D. K. (2013). Centralization in the global avoided deforestation collaboration network. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1199–1210.Google Scholar
Geden, O. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the inherent inconsistency of climate policymaking. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(6), 790–7.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture, In Geertz, C. (ed.), The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gehring, T., Oberthur, S., and Muehleck, M. (2013). European Union actorness in International institutions: Why the EU is recognized as an actor in some international institutions, but not in others. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(5), 849–65.Google Scholar
Gelcich, S., Hughes, T. P., Olsson, P., et al. (2010). Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107(39), 16794–99.Google Scholar
Gellers, J. C. (2016). Crowdsourcing global governance: Sustainable development goals, civil society, and the pursuit of democratic legitimacy. International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics, 16(3), 415–32.Google Scholar
Gerhardinger, L. C., Godoy, E. A., and Jones, P. J. (2009). Local ecological knowledge and the management of marine protected areas in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Management, 3(4), 154–65.Google Scholar
Gerhardinger, L. C., Godoy, E. A. S., Jones, P. J. S., Sales, G., and Ferreira, B. P. (2011). Marine protected dramas: The flaws of the Brazilian national system of marine protected areas. Environmental Management, 47(4), 630–43.Google Scholar
Gerlak, A. K., and Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades Restoration Program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–44.Google Scholar
Gero, A., Fletcher, S., Rumsey, M., et al. (2014). Disasters and climate change in the Pacific: Adaptive capacity of humanitarian response organizations. Climate and Development, 7(1), 35–46.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., and Ahn, T. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 217–39.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., and Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
Gill, S., and Cutler, C. (2014). New Constitutionalism and World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilmour, A., Walkerden, G., and Scandol, J. (1999). Adaptive management of the water cycle on the urban fringe: Three Australian case studies. Conservation Ecology, 3(1), www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art11/Google Scholar
Giri, K., and Darnhofer, I. (2010). Nepali women using community forestry as a platform for social change. Society & Natural Resources, 23(12), 1216–29.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. (2017). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Godfrey Paul, C., Merrill, C. B., and Hansen, J. M. (2008). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–45.Google Scholar
Goertz, G., and Mahoney, J. (2012). A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthau, A., and Keating, M. F., eds. (2018). Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy and Natural Resources. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Reyes-García, V., Olsson, P., and Montes, C. (2012). Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: A case study in Doñana, SW Spain. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 640–50.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. J. (2016a). Lament for a network? Cities and networked climate governance in Canada. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(3), 529–45.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. J. (2016b). The politics of accountability in networked urban climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 82–100.Google Scholar
Gough, Ian. (2017). Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Grant, D., Jorgenson, A., and Longhofer, W. (2018). Pathways to carbon pollution: The interactive effects of global, political, and organizational factors on power plants’ CO 2 emissions. Sociological Science, 5, 58–92.Google Scholar
Grant, R. W., and Keohane, R. O. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 29–43.Google Scholar
Green, J. F. (2014). Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grothmann, T., Grecksch, K., Winges, M., and Siebenhuener, B. (2013). Assessing institutional capacities to adapt to climate change: Integrating psychological dimensions in the adaptive capacity wheel. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(12), 3369–84.Google Scholar
Gruby, R. L. (2017). Macropolitics of Micronesia: Toward a critical theory of regional environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 9–27.Google Scholar
Grugel, J. (2002). Democracy without Borders: Transnationalisation and Conditionality in New Democracies. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2008). Accountability arrangements in non-state standards organizations: Instrumental design and imitation. Organization, 15(4), 563–83.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, L. H., and Auld, G. (2016). Contested accountability logics in evolving nonstate certification for fisheries sustainability. Global Environmental Politics, 16(2),42–60.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L., and Light, S. S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the Everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences, 39, 323–34.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. A., Kagan, R., and Thornton, D. (2006). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307–41.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. (2008). Transparency under scrutiny: Information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 1–7.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. (2010). Transparency in global environmental governance: A coming of age? Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 1–9.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. (2011). An evolving science-society contract in India: The search for legitimacy in anticipatory risk governance. Food Policy, 36(6), 736–41.Google Scholar
Gupta, A., Andresen, S., Siebenhüner, B., and Biermann, F. (2012). Science networks. In Pattberg, P. and Biermann, F. (eds.), Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered, pp. 69–94. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, A., Pistorius, T., and Vijge, M. J. (2016). Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance: The REDD + Partnership as bridge organization. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16, 355–74.Google Scholar
Gupta, J. (2008). Global change: Analysing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In Young, O. R., King, L. A., and Schroeder, H. (eds.), Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers, pp. 227–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., et al. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 459–71.Google Scholar
Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. (2004). When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 569–92.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Kahler, M., and Montgomery, A. H. (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International Organization, 63(3), 559–92.Google Scholar
Hage, M., Leroy, P., and Petersen, A. C. (2010). Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production. Futures, 42(3), 254–64.Google Scholar
Hagerman, S., Witter, R., Corson, C., et al. (2012). On the coattails of climate? Opportunities and threats of a warming earth for biodiversity conservation. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 724–35.Google Scholar
Hahn, T. (2011). Self-organized governance networks for ecosystem management: Who is accountable? Ecology and Society, 16(2), www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art18Google Scholar
Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34(4), 573–92.Google Scholar
Hajer, M. A. (2009). Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, T. and Held, D., eds. (2011). Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hale, T., Held, D., and Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hale, T., and Mauzerall, D. L. (2004). Thinking globally and acting locally: Can the Johannesburg partnerships coordinate action on sustainable development? The Journal of Environment & Development, 13(3), 220–39.Google Scholar
Hale, T., and Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9, 59–82.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (2010). Historical institutionalism in rationalist and sociological perspective. In Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, pp. 204–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heikkila, T., and Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512.Google Scholar
Heikkila, T., and Gerlak, A. K. (2019). Working on Learning: How the institutional rules of environmental governance matter. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,62(1), 106–23.Google Scholar
Held, D. (1991). Democracy, the nation-state and the global system. In Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordón, C. (eds.), Economy and Society, 20(2), 138–72.Google Scholar
Held, D. (1999). The transformation of political community: Rethinking democracy in the context of globalization. In Shapiro, I., Hacker-Cordón, C., and Hardin, R. (eds.), Democracy’s Edges, pp. 84–111. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heubaum, H., and Biermann, F. (2015). Integrating global energy and climate governance: The changing role of the International Energy Agency. Energy Policy, 87, 229–39.Google Scholar
Heuer, M. (2012). Sustainability governance across time and space: Connecting environmental stewardship in the firm with the global community. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 86–97.Google Scholar
Hobson, K., and Niemeyer, S. (2011). Public responses to climate change: The role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 957–71.Google Scholar
Homer-Dixon, T., Maynard, J. L., Mildenberger, M., et al. (2013). A complex systems approach to the study of ideology: Cognitive-affective structures and the dynamics of belief systems. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 337–63.Google Scholar
Hsu, A., Widerberg, O., Weinfurter, A., et al. (2018). Bridging the Emissions Gap: The Role of Non-State and Subnational Actors. The Emissions Gap Report 2018. A UN Environment Synthesis Report. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
Huitema, D., and Meijerink, S. V., eds. (2009). Water Policy Entrepreneurs: A Research Companion to Water Transitions Around the Globe, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Huitema, D., and Meijerink, S. V. (2010). Realizing water transitions: The role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 26.Google Scholar
Hultman, N. E., Malone, E. L., Runci, P., Carlock, G., and Anderson, K. L. (2012). Factors in low-carbon energy transformations: Comparing nuclear and bioenergy in Brazil, Sweden, and the United States. Energy Policy, 40, 131–46.Google Scholar
Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, M. (2014). Adaptive institutional design in agri-environmental programs. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 6(2), 145–65.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, M., Corkal, D. R., Warren, J., and Diaz, H. (2009). Climate change and water governance in Saskatchewan, Canada. International Journal of Climate Change Strategy and Management, 1(2), 118–32.Google Scholar
Ignatow, G. (2011). What has globalization done to developing countries’ public libraries? International Sociology, 26(6), 746–68.Google Scholar
Inoue, C. Y. A., and Moreira, P. F. (2016). Many worlds, many nature(s), one planet: Indigenous knowledge in the Anthropocene. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 59(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600Google Scholar
IPCC. (2018). Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C. Incheon, South Korea.Google Scholar
Jacobs, K., Lebel, L., Buizer, J., et al. (2016). Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 113(17), 4591–6.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Bauer, Z. A., et al. (2017). 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world. Joule, 1(1), 108–21.Google Scholar
Jamali, D. (2010). MNCs and international accountability standards through an institutional lens: Evidence of symbolic conformity or decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 617–40.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jedd, T., and Bixler, R. P. (2015). Accountability in networked governance: Learning from a case of landscape-scale forest conservation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(3), 172–87.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S. (2010). Overlap management in the World Trade Organization: Secretariat influence on trade-environment politics. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 54–79.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S. (2011). Marketing linkages: Secretariat governance of the climate-biodiversity interface. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 23–43.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S., and Lindsay, A. (2015). Secretariat influence on overlap management politics in North America: NAFTA and the commission for environmental cooperation. Review of Policy Research, 32(1), 124–45.Google Scholar
Jodoin, S., Duyck, S., and Lofts, K. (2015). Public participation and climate governance: An introduction. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law, 24(2), 117–22.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., and Huitema, D. (2014a). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23, 715–34.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., and Huitema, D. (2014b). Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change, 29, 387–94.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., and Forster, J. (2018). Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action? Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, M. (2013). Picking the best intercoder reliability statistic for your digital activism content analysis, on the Digital Activism Research Project webpage: http://digital-activism.org/2013/05/picking-the-best-intercoder-reliability-statistic-for-your-digital-activism-content-analysis/Google Scholar
Kabiri, N. (2016). Public participation, land use and climate change governance in Thailand. Land Use Policy, 52, 511–17.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., et al. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732.Google Scholar
Kalfagianni, A., and Pattberg, P. (2013). Participation and inclusiveness in private rule setting organisations: Does it really matter for effectiveness? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 231–50.Google Scholar
Kampelmann, S., Van Hollebeke, S., and Vandergert, P. (2016). Stuck in the middle with you: The role of bridging organisations in urban regeneration. Ecological Economics, 129, 82–93.Google Scholar
Kanie, N., Betsill, M. M., Zondervan, R., Biermann, F., and Young, O. R. (2012). A charter moment: Restructuring governance for sustainability. Public Administration and Development, 32, 292–304.Google Scholar
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., and McGee, J. (2013). Legitimacy in an era of fragmentation: The case of global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 56–78.Google Scholar
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., and van Asselt, H. (2009). Introduction: Exploring and explaining the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3), 195–211.Google Scholar
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., and Vihma, A. (2009). Comparing the legitimacy and effectiveness of global hard and soft law: An analytical framework. Regulation and Governance, 3(4), 400–20.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. M., and Adger, W. N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation.Climatic Change, 47(4), 325–52.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. (2003). Global governance and democratic accountability. In Held, D. and Koenig-Archibugi, M. (eds.), Taming Globalization: Frontier of Governance, pp. 130–59. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., and Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 7–23.Google Scholar
Kim, R. E. (2013). The emergent network structure of the multilateral environmental agreement system. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 980–91.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (2014). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Klinsky, S., Roberts, T., Huq, S., et al. (2016). Why equity is fundamental in climate change policy research. Global Environmental Change, 44, 170–3.Google Scholar
Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Chobotova, V., and Smolkova, E. (2013). The challenges of policy convergence: The Europeanization of biodiversity governance in an enlarging EU. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(3), 401–13.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T., Kokko, K., Duyck, S., Sellheim, N., and Stepien, A. (2012). The present and future competence of the European Union in the Arctic. Polar Record, 48(247), 361–71.Google Scholar
Kolhoff, A. J., Driessen, P. P. J., and Runhaar, H. A. C. (2013). An analysis framework for characterizing and explaining development of EIA legislation in developing countries-Illustrated for Georgia, Ghana and Yemen. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 1–15.Google Scholar
Kolhoff, A. J., Runhaar, H. A., Gugushvili, T., et al. (2016). The influence of actor capacities on EIA system performance in low and middle income countries: Cases from Georgia and Ghana. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 57, 167–77.Google Scholar
Kramarz, T. (2016). World bank partnerships and the promise of democratic governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
Kramarz, T., and Momani, B. (2013). The World Bank as knowledge bank: Analyzing the limits of a legitimate global knowledge actor. Review of Policy Research, 30(4), 409–31.Google Scholar
Kramarz, T., and Park, S. (2016). Accountability in global environmental governance: A meaningful tool for action? Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F. V. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30, 411–33.Google Scholar
Krook, M. L., and True, J. (2012). Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality. European Journal of International Affairs, 18(1), 103–27.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962). Theory of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kunseler, E. M., Tuinstra, W., Vasileiadou, E., and Petersen, A. C. (2015). The reflective futures practitioner: Balancing salience, credibility and legitimacy in generating foresight knowledge with stakeholders. Futures, 66, 1–12.Google Scholar
Kuyper, J. W. (2014). Global democratization and international regime complexity. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 620–46.Google Scholar
Kuzdas, C., Wiek, A., Warner, B., Vignola, R., and Morataya, R. (2014). Sustainability appraisal of water governance regimes: The case of Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Environmental Management, 54(2), 205–22.Google Scholar
Larson, S., Alexander, K. S., Djalante, R., and Kirono, D. G. C. (2013). The added value of understanding informal social networks in an adaptive capacity assessment: Explorations of an urban water management system in Indonesia. Water Resources Management, 27(13), 4425–41.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., and Leca, B. (2009). Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, M. (2013). Democracy in the Anthropocene? Science and sustainable development goals at the UN. Huffington Post, 27.Google Scholar
Leach, M., Scoones, I., and Wynne, B. (2005). Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, 2nd ed., 2 vols. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Leach, W. D. (2006). Collaborative public management and democracy: Evidence from western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review, 66, 100–10.Google Scholar
Lebel, L. (2006). The politics of scale in environmental assessment. In Reid, W. V., Berkes, F., Wilbanks, T., and Capistrando, D. (eds.), Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment, pp. 37–57. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Lebel, L., Grothmann, T., and Siebenhüner, B. (2010a). The role of social learning in adaptiveness: Insights from water management. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 333–53.Google Scholar
Lebel, L., Wattana, S., and Talerngsri, P. (2015). Assessments of ecosystem services and human well-being in Thailand build and create demand for coproductive capacity. Ecology and Society, 20(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06527-200112Google Scholar
Lebel, L., Xu, J., Bastakoti, R. C., and Lamba, A. (2010b). Pursuits of adaptiveness in the shared rivers of Monsoon Asia. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 355–75.Google Scholar
Lebel, P., Sriyasak, P., Kallayanamitra, C., Duangsuwan, C., and Lebel, L. (2016). Learning about climate-related risks: Decisions of Northern Thailand fish farmers in a role-playing simulation game. Regional Environmental Change, 16(5), 1481–94.Google Scholar
Ledford, H. (2015). How to solve the world’s biggest problems. Nature, 525(7569), 308–11.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., Primavera, J. H., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., et al. (2014). Ecological role and services of tropical mangrove ecosystems: A reassessment. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23(7), 726–43.Google Scholar
Lemos, M. C., and Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 297–325.Google Scholar
Lesage, D., and Van de Graaf, T. (2013). Thriving in complexity? The OECD system’s role in energy and taxation. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 19(1), 83–92.Google Scholar
Lesage, D., Van de Graaf, T., and Westphal, K. (2009). The G8’s role in global energy governance since the 2005 Gleneagles summit. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 15(2), 259–77.Google Scholar
Leventon, J. (2015). Explaining implementation deficits through multi-level governance in the EU’s new member states: EU limits for arsenic in drinking water in Hungary. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(7), 1137–53.Google Scholar
Leventon, J., Dyer, J. C., and Van Alstine, J. D. (2015). The private sector in climate governance: Opportunities for climate compatible development through multilevel industry-government engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 316–23.Google Scholar
Leventon, J., Kalaba, F. K., Dyer, J. C., Stringer, L. C., and Dougill, A. J. (2014). Delivering community benefits through REDD+: Lessons from joint forest management in Zambia. Forest Policy and Economics, 44, 10–17.Google Scholar
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., and Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–52.Google Scholar
Levy, D. L., and Newell, P. J., eds. (2005). The Business of Global Environmental Governance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–16.Google Scholar
Liu, L., Matsuno, S., Zhang, B., Liu, B., and Young, O. R. (2013). Local governance on climate mitigation: A comparative study of China and Japan. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 475–89.Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., and Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., and Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 599–626.Google Scholar
Lövbrand, E., Stripple, J., and Wiman, B. (2009). Earth System governmentality: Reflections on science in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 19(1), 7–13.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A Radical View, 2nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Luks, F., and Siebenhüner, B. (2007). Transdisciplinarity for social learning? The contribution of the German socio-ecological research initiative to sustainability governance. Ecological economics, 63(2–3), 418–26.Google Scholar
Lund, E. (2013). Who is driving? Public and private agency in the implementation of the CDM. Carbon Management, 4(1), 57–68.Google Scholar
Mace, G. M., Barrett, M., Burgess, N. D., et al. (2018). Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nature Sustainability, 1(9), 448–51.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., and Thelen, K., eds. (2010). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martinez-Alier, J. (2014). The environmentalism of the poor. Geoforum, 54, 239–41.Google Scholar
Mason, M. (2008). The governance of transnational environmental harm: Addressing new modes of accountability/responsibility. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 8–24.Google Scholar
Mathur, V. N., Afionis, S., Paavola, J., Dougill, A. J., and Stringer, L. C. (2014). Experiences of host communities with carbon market projects: Towards multi-level climate justice. Climate Policy, 14(1), 42–62.Google Scholar
Mattor, K., Betsill, M. M., Huber-Stearns, H., et al. (2014). Transdisciplinary research on environmental governance: A view from the inside. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, 90–100.Google Scholar
Mauerhofer, V., Kim, R. E., and Stevens, C. (2015). When implementation works: A comparison of Ramsar Convention implementation in different continents. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 95–105.Google Scholar
May, J. R., and Daly, E. (2015). Global Environmental Constitutionalism. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. (2017). Mission-oriented innovation policy: Challenges and opportunities, UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper. London: University College London.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (2005). Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode, 37(4), 731–53.Google Scholar
McDermott, C. L., Coad, L., Helfgott, A., and Schroeder, H. (2012). Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: Actors, interests and ideas. Environmental Science and Policy 21, 63–72.Google Scholar
McKehnie, R. (1996). Insiders and outsiders identifying experts on home ground. In Wynne, B. and Irwin, A. (eds.), Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, pp. 126–51. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mees, H., and Driessen, P. (2019). A framework for assessing the accountability of local governance arrangements for adaptation to climate change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4), 671–91.Google Scholar
Mees, H. L. P., Driessen, P. P. J., and Runhaar, H. A. C. (2014). Legitimate adaptive flood risk governance beyond the dikes: The cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam. Regional Environmental Change, 14(2), 671–82.Google Scholar
Meijerink, S. V., and Huitema, D. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs and change strategies: Lessons from sixteen case studies of water transitions around the globe. Ecology and Society, 15, 268.Google Scholar
Meissner, R., and Ramasar, V. (2015). Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa. Geo Journal, 80(5), 689–709.Google Scholar
Menga, F., and Mirumachi, N. (2016). Fostering Tajik hydraulic development: Examining the role of soft power in the case of the Rogun Dam. Water Alternatives, 9(2), 373–88.Google Scholar
Merme, V., Ahlers, R., and Gupta, J. (2014). Private equity, public affair: Hydropower financing in the Mekong Basin. Global Environmental Change, 24, 20–9.Google Scholar
Mert, A. (2014). Hybrid governance mechanisms as political instruments: The case of sustainability partnerships. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics, 14(3), 225–44.Google Scholar
Milkoreit, M. (2015a). Hot deontology and cold consequentialism: An empirical exploration of ethical reasoning among climate change negotiators. Climatic Change, 130(3), 397–409.Google Scholar
Milkoreit, M. (2015b). Science and climate change diplomacy: Cognitive limits and the need to reinvent science communication. In Davis, L. S. and Patman, R. G. (eds.), Science Diplomacy: New Day or False Dawn?, pp. 109–31. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Milkoreit, M. (2016). The promise of climate fiction: Imagination, storytelling, and the politics of the future. In Wapner, P. and Elver, H. (eds.), Reimagining Climate Change, pp. 171–91. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milkoreit, M. (2017). Mindmade Politics: The Cognitive Roots of International Climate Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Milkoreit, M., and Haapala, K. (2019). The global stocktake: Design lessons for a new review and ambition mechanism in the international climate regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(1), 89–106.Google Scholar
Milkoreit, M., Moore, M. L., Schoon, M., and Meek, C. L. (2015). Resilience scientists as change-makers-growing the middle ground between science and advocacy? Environmental Science and Policy, 53, 87–95.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. (2007). Democratization, international knowledge institutions, and global governance. Governance, 20(2), 325–57.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A., and Edwards, P. N., eds. (2001). Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Minas, S. (2015). The rise of transnational networks in climate change governance: A study in hybridity. Transnational Law Institute Think! 05/2015, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2698561##Google Scholar
Mirumachi, N., and Torriti, J. (2012). The use of public participation and economic appraisal for public involvement in large-scale hydropower projects: Case study of the Nam Theun 2 Hydropower Project. Energy Policy, 47, 125–32.Google Scholar
Mirumachi, N., and Van Wyk, E. (2010). Cooperation at different scales: Challenges for local and international water resource governance in South Africa. Geographical Journal, 176(1), 25–38.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. (2018). International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2018.1). Available at: http://iea.uoregon.eduGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. L., Tjornbo, O., Enfors, E., et al. (2014). Studying the complexity of change: Toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations. Ecology and Society, 19, DOI:10.5751/ES-06966-190454Google Scholar
Morin, J. F. (2010). The two-level game of transnational networks: The case of the access to medicines campaign. International Interactions, 36(4), 309–34.Google Scholar
Morin, J. F. (2014). Paradigm shift in the global IP regime: The agency of academics. Review of International Political Economy, 21(2), 275–309.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., and Hughes, T. P. (2017). Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: Sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(5), 479.Google Scholar
Morriss, P. (1987). Power: A Philosophical Analysis, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53.Google Scholar
Mounk, Y. (2016). How political science gets politics wrong. The Chronicle of Higher Education, October 30.Google Scholar
Mukhtarov, F., Brock, A., Janssen, S., and Guignier, A. (2013). Actors and strategies in translating global conservation narratives to Vietnam: An agency perspective. Policy and Society, 32(2), 113–24.Google Scholar
Mukhtarov, F., and Gerlak, A. K. (2013). River basin organizations in the global water discourse: An exploration of agency and strategy. Global Governance, 19(2), 307–26.Google Scholar
Mulyani, M., and Jepson, P. (2015). Social learning through a REDD+ ‘village agreement’: Insights from the KFCP in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56(1), 79–95.Google Scholar
Munaretto, S., and Huitema, D. (2012). Adaptive comanagement in the Venice lagoon? An analysis of current water and environmental management practices and prospects for change. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 19.Google Scholar
Naess, L. O., Newell, P., Newsham, A., et al. (2015). Climate policy meets national development contexts: Insights from Kenya and Mozambique. Global Environmental Change, 35, 534–44.Google Scholar
Nanz, P., and Steffek, J. (2004). Global governance, participation and the public sphere. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 314–35.Google Scholar
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., and Bäckstrand, K (2016). Normative arguments for non-state actor participation in international policymaking processes: Functionalism, neocorporatism or democratic pluralism? European Journal of International Relations, 22(4), 920–43.Google Scholar
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., and Linner, B. O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics, 16(1), 109–26.Google Scholar
Nayak, P., Armitage, D., and Andrachuk, M. (2016). Power and politics of social-ecological regime shifts in the Chilika lagoon, India and Tam Giang lagoon, Vietnam. Regional Environmental Change, 16(2), 325–39.Google Scholar
Nerini, F. F., Tomei, J., To, L. S., et al. (2018). Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Energy, 3(1), 10.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. P. (2009). Political ecology: Theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography, 33(3), 398–406.Google Scholar
Newell, P. (2008a). Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 122–53.Google Scholar
Newell, P. (2008b). The political economy of global environmental governance. Review of International Studies, 34, 507–29.Google Scholar
Newell, P. (2012). Globalization and the Environment: Capitalism, Ecology and Power, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Newell, P., Bulkeley, H., Turner, K., Shaw, C., Caney, S., Shove, E., and Pidgeon, N. (2015). Governance traps in climate change politics: Re-framing the debate in terms of responsibilities and rights. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(6), 535–40.Google Scholar
Newell, P., Pattberg, P., and Schroeder, H. (2012). Multiactor governance and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 365–87.Google Scholar
Newell, P., Phillips, J., and Purohit, P. (2011). The political economy of clean development in India: CDM and beyond. IDS Bulletin, 42(3), 89–96.Google Scholar
Newton, P., Agrawal, A., and Wollenberg, L. (2013). Enhancing the sustainability of commodity supply chains in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1761–72.Google Scholar
Newton, P., Miller, D. C., Byenkya, M. A. A., and Agrawal, A. (2016). Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions. Land Use Policy, 57, 388–95.Google Scholar
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.Google Scholar
Obani, P., and Gupta, J. (2016). Human right to sanitation in the legal and non-legal literature: The need for greater synergy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3(5), 678–91.Google Scholar
Obani, P., and Ogbodo, S. G. (2013). Strengthening the national institutional framework for environmental migration through sustainable development. Hong Kong Law Journal, 43(3), 897–916.Google Scholar
O’Brien, K. (2012). Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 667–76.Google Scholar
Ogier, E. M., Davidson, J., Fidelman, P., et al. (2016). Fisheries management approaches as platforms for climate change adaptation: Comparing theory and practice in Australian fisheries. Marine Policy, 71, 82–93.Google Scholar
Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., and Schroeder, H. (2009). Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 58–78.Google Scholar
Okereke, C., and Coventry, P. (2016). Climate justice and the International regime: Before, during, and after Paris. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(6), 834–51.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Hughes, T. P. (2008). Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105(28), 9489–94.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Galaz, V., and Boonstra, W. J. (2014). Sustainability transformations: A resilience perspective. Ecology and Society, 19(4), http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06799-190401Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/Google Scholar
Olsson, L., and Jerneck, A. (2010). Farmers fighting climate change—from victims to agents in subsistence livelihoods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 363–73.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K., Balsiger, J., and VanDeveer, S.D. (2004). Actors, norms, and impact: Recent international cooperation theory and the influence of the agent-structure debate. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 149–75.Google Scholar
Orsini, A. (2012). Business as a regulatory leader for risk governance? The compact initiative for liability and redress under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Environmental Politics, 21(6), 960–79.Google Scholar
Orsini, A. (2013). Multi-forum non-state actors: Navigating the regime complexes for forestry and genetic resources. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 34–55.Google Scholar
Orsini, A., Morin, J. F., and Young, O. R. (2013). Regime complexes: A buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance? Global Governance, 19, 27–39.Google Scholar
Oscarson, D. B., and Calhoun, A. J. (2007). Developing vernal pool conservation plans at the local level using citizen-scientists. Wetlands, 27(1), 80–95.Google Scholar
Österblom, H., and Folke, C. (2015). Globalization, marine regime shifts and the Soviet Union. Philosophical Transactions B, 370(1659), https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0278Google Scholar
Österblom, H., Jouffray, J.-B., Folke, C., et al. (2015). Transnational corporations as ‘keystone actors’ in marine ecosystems. PLoS ONE, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127533Google Scholar
Österblom, H., and Sumaila, U. R. (2011). Toothfish crises, actor diversity and the emergence of compliance mechanisms in the Southern Ocean. Global Environmental Change, 21, 972–82.Google Scholar
Paavola, J. (2007). Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 93–103.Google Scholar
Paavola, J., Gouldson, A., and Kluvánková‐Oravská, T. (2009). Interplay of actors, scales, frameworks and regimes in the governance of biodiversity. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 148–58.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–65.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C., Lebel, L., Knieper, C., and Nikitina, E. (2012). From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 24–34.Google Scholar
Paloniemi, R., Apostolopoulou, E., Cent, J., et al. (2015). Public participation and environmental justice in biodiversity governance in Finland, Greece, Poland and the UK. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(5), 330–42.Google Scholar
Paloniemi, R., Apostolopoulou, E., Primmer, E., et al. (2012). Biodiversity conservation across scales: Lessons from a science-policy dialogue. Nature Conservation-Bulgaria, 2, 7–19.Google Scholar
Papa, M., and Gleason, N. W. (2012). Major emerging powers in sustainable development diplomacy: Assessing their leadership potential. Global Environmental Change, 22, 915–24.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (2003). Cooperative forms of governance: Problems of democratic accountability in complex environments. European Journal of Political Research, 42(4), 473–501.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Problems of democratic accountability in network and multilevel governance. European Law Journal, 13(4), 469–86.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (2014). Accountability and multi-level governance: More accountability, less democracy? In Curtin, D., Mair, P., and Papadopoulos, Y. (eds.), Accountability and European Governance, pp. 112–31. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Park, S. E., Marshall, N. A., Jakku, E., et al. (2012). Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change, 22, 115–26.Google Scholar
Partzsch, L., and Ziegler, R. (2011). Social entrepreneurs as change agents: A case study on power and authority in the water sector. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 63–83.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. (2005). The institutionalization of private governance: How business and nonprofit organizations agree on transnational rules, Governance, 18(4), 589–610.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. (2012). How climate change became a business risk: Analyzing nonstate agency in global climate politics. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 613–26.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. H., Biermann, F., Chan, S., and Mert, A., eds. (2012). Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Emergence, Influence and Legitimacy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P., and Stripple, J. (2008). Beyond the public and private divide: Remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 367–88.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P., and Widerberg, O. (2015). Theorising global environmental governance: Key findings and future questions. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 684–705.Google Scholar
Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., et al. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–16.Google Scholar
Pavese, C. B., and Torney, D. (2012). The contribution of the European Union to global climate change governance: Explaining the conditions for EU actorness. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 55, 125–43.Google Scholar
Payne, R. A., and Samhat, N. H. (2012). Democratizing Global Politics: Discourse Norms, International Regimes, and Political Community. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Persha, L., Agrawal, A., and Chhatre, A. (2011). Social and ecological synergy: Local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science, 331(6024), 1606–8.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, E., and Leentvaar, J. (2013). Knowledge leads, policy follows? Two speeds of collaboration in river basin management. Water Policy, 15, 282–99.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. W. B., Castle, D., and Smyth, S. J. (2015). Biotechnology, Agriculture and Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Pickering, J., Skovgaard, J., Kim, S., et al. (2015). Acting on climate finance pledges: Inter-agency dynamics and relationships with aid in contributor states. World Development, 68, 149–62.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2003). Big, slow-moving, and … invisible. In Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, pp. 177–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pittman, J., Armitage, D., Alexander, S., and Campbell, D. (2015). Governance fit for climate change in a Caribbean coastal-marine context. Marine Policy, 51, 486–98.Google Scholar
Plummer, R., Armitage, D., and de Loë, R. C. (2013), Adaptive comanagement and its relationship to environmental governance. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 21.Google Scholar
Prno, J., Bradshaw, B., Wandel, J., et al. (2011). Community vulnerability to climate change in the context of other exposure-sensitivities in Kugluktuk, Nunavut. Polar Research, 30(1), 7363.Google Scholar
Qi, Y., and Zhang, L. (2014). Local environmental enforcement constrained by central–local relations in China. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(3), 216–32.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The Open Method of Coordination: A New Governance Architecture for the European Union? Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Rasche, A. (2009.) Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards: The case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(4), 192–205.Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., et al. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1766–77.Google Scholar
Rayner, T., and Jordan, A. (2013). The European Union: The polycentric climate policy leader? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(2), 75–90.Google Scholar
Reid, W. V., Chen, D., Goldfarb, L., et al. (2010). Earth system science for global sustainability: Grand challenges. Science, 330(6006), 916–17.Google Scholar
Renaud, F. G., Dun, O., Warner, K., and Bogardi, J. (2011). A decision framework for environmentally induced migration. International Migration, 49, e5–e29.Google Scholar
Rindefjäll, T., Lund, E., and Stripple, J. (2011). Wine, fruit, and emission reductions: The CDM as development strategy in Chile. International Environmental Agreements, 11(1), 7–22.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. W., and Berkes, F. (2011). Multi-level participation for building adaptive capacity: Formal agency-community interactions in northern Kenya. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 21(4), 1185–94.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. W., and Makupa, E. (2015). Using analysis of governance to unpack community-based conservation: A case study from Tanzania. Environmental Management, 56(5), 1214–27.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472.Google Scholar
Rocle, N., and Salles, D. (2018). Pioneers but not guinea pigs: Experimenting with climate change adaptation in French coastal areas. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 231–47.Google Scholar
Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., and Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. (2002). NGOs and fragmented authority in globalizing space. In Ferguson, Y. H. and Jones, R. J. B. (eds.), Political Space: Frontiers of Change and Governance in a Globalizing World, pp. 261–80. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. (2007). Governing the ungovernable: The challenge of a global disaggregation of authority. Regulation & Governance, 1(1), 88–97.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N., and Czempiel, E.O. (1992). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J. (2017). More than a question of agency: Privatized project implementation, accountabilities, and global environmental governance. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 10–30.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D., Berton, H., and Meadowcroft, J. (2016). Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada. Research Policy, 45(6), 1275–90.Google Scholar
Rosendal, K., and Andresen, S. (2016). Realizing access and benefit sharing from use of genetic resources between diverging international regimes: The scope for leadership. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(4), 579–96.Google Scholar
Rozema, J. G., Bond, A. J., Cashmore, M., and Chilvers, J. (2012). An investigation of environmental and sustainability discourses associated with the substantive purposes of environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33(1), 80–90.Google Scholar
Rozema, J. G., Cashmore, M., Bond, A. J., and Chilvers, J. (2015). Respatialization and local protest strategy formation: Investigating high-speed rail megaproject development in the UK. Geoforum, 59, 98–108.Google Scholar
Runhaar, H. (2009). Putting SEA in context: A discourse perspective on how SEA contributes to decision-making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(3), 200–9.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. (2016). Non-State Actor Dynamics in International Law: From Law-Takers to Law-Makers. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Sacchi, S., Riva, P., Brambilla, M., and Grasso, M. (2014). Moral reasoning and climate change mitigation: The deontological reaction toward the market-based approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 252–61.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Sand, P. H. (2004). Sovereignty bounded: Public trusteeship for common pool resources? Global Environmental Politics, 4(1), 47–71.Google Scholar
Sanz, M., Siebel, M. A., Ahlers, R., and Gupta, J. (2016). New approaches to cleaner production: Applying the Sasi method to micro-tanneries in Colombia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 963–71.Google Scholar
Sayer, A. (2011). Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., and Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–32.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–40.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. (2009). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D., Collins, L., and Niemeyer, S. (2017). Adaptation policy and community discourse: Risk, vulnerability, and just transformation. Environmental Politics, 26(3), 413–37.Google Scholar
Schout, A., and Jordan, A. (2008). The European Union’s governance ambitions and its administrative capacities. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(7), 957–74.Google Scholar
Schouten, G., and Glasbergen, P. (2012). Private multi-stakeholder governance in the agricultural market place: An analysis of legitimization processes of the roundtables on sustainable palm oil and responsible soy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(B), 63–88.Google Scholar
Schouten, G., Leroy, P., and Glasbergen, P. (2012). On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The roundtables on responsible soy and sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 83, 42–50.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H. (2010). Agency in international climate negotiations: The case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 317–32.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H., Burch, S., and Rayner, S. (2013). Novel multisector networks and entrepreneurship in urban climate governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 761–8.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H., and Lovell, H. (2012). The role of non-nation-state actors and side events in the international climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 12(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
Schultz, L., Folke, C., Osterblom, H., and Olsson, P. (2015). Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 112(24), 7369–74.Google Scholar
Schwaub, K. (2012). The end of capitalism – so what’s next? World Economic Forum. www.weforum.org/agenda/2012/04/the-end-of-capitalism-so-whats-next/Google Scholar
Scobie, M. (2017). Accountability in climate change governance and Caribbean SIDS. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(2), 769–87.Google Scholar
Scolobig, A., Komendantova, N., Patt, A., et al. (2014). Multi-risk governance for natural hazards in Naples and Guadeloupe. Natural Hazards, 72(3), 1523–45.Google Scholar
Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly. 19(3), 321–5.Google Scholar
Scudder, T. (1981). What it means to be dammed: The anthropology of large-scale development projects in the tropics and subtropics. Engineering and Science, 44(4), 9–15.Google Scholar
Scudder, T. (1993). Development-induced relocation and refugee studies: 37 years of change and continuity among Zambia’s Gwembe Tonga. Journal of Refugee Studies, 6(2), 123–52.Google Scholar
Secretariat of the Convention on Bio Diversity. (2010). Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. Montreal: Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
Seitzinger, S. P., Svedin, U., Crumley, C. L., et al. (2012). Planetary stewardship in an urbanizing world: Beyond city limits. Ambio, 41(8), 787–94.Google Scholar
Sending, O. J., and Neumann, I. B. (2006). Governance to governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, states, and power. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 651–72.Google Scholar
Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., et al. (2016). Carbon lock-in: Types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 425–52.Google Scholar
Sherbin, L. (2017). New research: Diversity + inclusion = better decision making at work, Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/eriklarson/2017/09/21/new-research-diversity-inclusion-better-decision-making-at-work/#106b39704cbfGoogle Scholar
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning, 42(6), 1273–85.Google Scholar
Siebenhüner, B. (2005). The role of social learning on the road to sustainability. In Rosenau, J. N., von Weizsacker, E. U., and Petschow, U. (eds.), pp. 86–99. Governance and Sustainability, Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
Siebenhüner, B. (2008). Learning in international organizations in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 92–116.Google Scholar
Simpson, S., Brown, G., Peterson, A., and Johnstone, R. (2016). Stakeholder perspectives for coastal ecosystem services and influences on value integration in policy. Ocean and Coastal Management, 126, 9–21.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A. M. (2017). The Chessboard and the Web: Strategies of Connection in a Networked World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (2002). The United States and the discipline of international relations: ‘Hegemonic country, hegemonic discipline.’ International Studies Review, 4(2), 67–85.Google Scholar
Smits, M., and Middleton, C. (2014). New arenas of engagement at the water governance-climate finance nexus? An analysis of the boom and bust of hydropower CDM projects in Vietnam. Water Alternatives, 7(3), 561–83.Google Scholar
Sofronova, E., Holley, C., and Nagarajan, V. (2014). Environmental non-governmental organizations and Russian environmental governance: Accountability, participation and collaboration. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(2), 341–71.Google Scholar
South Centre. (1997). For a Strong and Democratic United Nations: A South Perspective on UN Reform. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sova, C. A., Helfgott, A., Chaudhury, A. S., et al. (2015a). Multi-level stakeholder influence mapping: Visualizing power relations across actor levels in Nepal’s agricultural climate change adaptation regime. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28, 383–409.Google Scholar
Sova, C., Vervoort, J., Thornton, T., et al. (2015b). Exploring farmer preference shaping in international agricultural climate change adaptation regimes. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 463–74.Google Scholar
Spagnuolo, F. (2011). Diversity and pluralism in earth system governance: Contemplating the role for global administrative law. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1875–81.Google Scholar
Spiro, P. J. (1988). Taking foreign policy away from the Feds. The Washington Quarterly, 11(1), 191–203.Google Scholar
Spiro, P. J. (1995). New global communities: Nongovernmental organizations in international decision making institutions. The Washington Quarterly, 18(1), 45–56.Google Scholar
Spruijt, P., Knol, A. B., Vasileiadou, E., et al. (2014). Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, 40, 16–25.Google Scholar
Steffek, J. (2004). Why IR needs legitimacy: A rejoinder. European Journal of International Relations, 10(3), 485–90.Google Scholar
Steffek, J. (2010). Public accountability and the public sphere of international governance. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
Steffek, J., and Ferretti, M. P. (2009) Accountability or “good decisions”? The competing goals of civil society participation in international governance. Global Society, 23(1), 37–57.Google Scholar
Stephenson, M. O. Jr. (2011). Considering the relationships among social conflict, social imaginaries, resilience, and community-based organization leadership. Ecology and Society, 16, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art34/Google Scholar
Sternlieb, F., Bixler, R. P., Huber-Stearns, H., and Huayhuaca, C. (2013). A question of fit: Reflections on boundaries, organizations and social-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 117–25.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H., and Dryzek, J. S. (2012). The discursive democratisation of global climate governance. Environmental Politics, 21(2), 189–210.Google Scholar
Stoett, P., and Temby, O. (2015). Bilateral and trilateral natural resource and biodiversity governance in North America: Organizations, networks, and inclusion. Review of Policy Research, 32(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1988). States and Markets. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1982). Cave! hic dragones: A critique of regime analysis. International Organization, 36(2), 479–96.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., and Thelen, K. A., eds. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szulecki, K., Pattberg, P., and Biermann, F. (2011). Explaining variation in the effectiveness of transnational energy partnerships: Effectiveness of transnational energy partnerships. Governance, 24(4), 713–36.Google Scholar
Taplin, R., and McGee, J. (2010). The Asia-Pacific Partnership: Implementation challenges and interplay with Kyoto. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 16–22.Google Scholar
Taylor, A., Cocklin, C., and Brown, R. (2012). Fostering environmental champions: A process to build their capacity to drive change. Journal of Environmental Management, 98, 84–97.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. L. (2012). Multiple forest activities, multiple purpose organizations: Organizing for complexity in a grassroots movement in Guatemala’s Petén. Forest Ecology and Management, 268, 29–38.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. L., and Cheng, A. (2012). Environmental governance as embedded process: Managing change in two community-based forestry organizations. Human Organization, 71(1), 110–22.Google Scholar
Termeer, C., Biesbroek, R., and Van den Brink, M. (2012). Institutions for adaptation to climate change: Comparing national adaptation strategies in Europe. European Political Science, 11(1), 41–53.Google Scholar
Thaler, T. (2014). Developing partnership approaches for flood risk management: Implementation of inter-local co-operations in Austria. Water International, 39(7), 1018–29.Google Scholar
Thaler, T., and Levin-Keitel, M. (2016). Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management—A question of roles and power: Lessons from England. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 292–301.Google Scholar
Thaler, T., and Priest, S. (2014). Partnership funding in flood risk management: New localism debate and policy in England. Area, 46(4), 418–25.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 471–98.Google Scholar
Thomson, I., Dey, C., and Russell, S. (2015). Activism, arenas and accounts in conflicts over tobacco control. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 809–45.Google Scholar
Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341–63.Google Scholar
Tiwari, P. C., and Joshi, B. (2015). Local and regional institutions and environmental governance in Hindu Kush Himalaya. Environmental Science & Policy, 49, 66–74.Google Scholar
Toivonen, M., and Hyytinen, K. (2015). Future energy services: Empowering local communities and citizens. Foresight, 17, 349–64.Google Scholar
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., and Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tortajada, C., and Biswas, A. K. (2018). Achieving universal access to clean water and sanitation in an era of water scarcity: Strengthening contributions from academia. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 21–5.Google Scholar
Turnhout, E., Neves, K., and De Lijster, E. (2014). ‘Measurementality’ in biodiversity governance: Knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environment and Planning A, 46(3), 581–97.Google Scholar
Uittenbroek, C. J., Janssen-Jansen, L. B., and Runhaar, H. A. C. (2016). Stimuli for climate adaptation in cities: Insights from Philadelphia – An early adapter. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8(1), 38–56.Google Scholar
Underdal, A., Hovi, J., Kallbekken, S., and Skodvin, T. (2012). Can conditional commitments break the climate change negotiations deadlock? International Political Science Review, 33(4), 475–93.Google Scholar
Urpelainen, J., and Van de Graaf, T. (2015). The international renewable energy agency: A success story in institutional innovation? International Environmental Agreement: Politics, Law and Economics, 15(2), 159–77.Google Scholar
van Asselt, H. (2016). The role of non-state actors in reviewing ambition, implementation, and compliance under the Paris agreement. Climate Law, 6(1–2), 91–108.Google Scholar
van Asselt, H., Kanie, N., and Iguchi, M. (2009). Japan’s position in international climate policy: Navigating between Kyoto and the APP. International Environmental Agreements, 9(3), 319–36.Google Scholar
Van Buuren, A., Driessen, P. P., van Rijswick, M., et al. (2013). Towards adaptive spatial planning for climate change: Balancing between robustness and flexibility. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 10(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, T. (2012). Obsolete or resurgent? The International Energy Agency in a changing global landscape. Energy Policy, 48, 233–41.Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, T., and Lesage, D. (2009). The International Energy Agency after 35 years: Reform needs and institutional adaptability. The Review of International Organizations, 4, 293–317.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, J. (2010). One task, a few approaches, many impacts: Private-sector involvement in Canadian building code enforcement. Canadian Public Administration, 53(3), 351–74.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, J. (2015). The role of government in voluntary environmental programmes: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Public Administration, 93(3), 576–92.Google Scholar
van Kerkhoff, L. E., and Lebel, L. (2015). Coproductive capacities: Rethinking science-governance relations in a diverse world. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 14.Google Scholar
van Laerhoven, F. (2014). When is participatory local environmental governance likely to emerge? A study of collective action in participatory municipal environmental councils in Brazil. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(2), 77–93.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, J. (2015). The regionalization of maritime governance: Towards a polycentric governance system for sustainable shipping in the European Union. Ocean & Coastal Management, 117, 23–31.Google Scholar
van Stigt, R., Driessen, P. P. J., and Spit, T. J. (2016). Steering urban environmental quality in a multi-level governance context. How can devolution be the solution to pollution? Land Use Policy, 50, 268–76.Google Scholar
van Tatenhove, J., Raakjae, J., van Leeuwen, J., and van Hoof, L. (2014). Regional cooperation for European seas: Governance models in support of the implementation of the MFSD. Marine Policy, 50, 364–72.Google Scholar
Vasileiadou, E., Hisschemoller, M., Petersen, A. C., et al. (2014). Adaptation to extreme weather: Identifying different societal perspectives in the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 14(1), 91–101.Google Scholar
Vasileiadou, E., and Safarzńyska, K. (2010). Transitions: Taking complexity seriously. Futures, 42(10), 1176–86.Google Scholar
Vasseur, L., Lafrance, L., Ansseau, C., et al. (1997). Advisory committee: A powerful tool for helping decision makers in environmental issues. Environmental Management, 21(3), 359–65.Google Scholar
Vervoort, J., and Gupta, A. (2018). Anticipating climate futures in a 1.5 C era: The link between foresight and governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 104–11.Google Scholar
Villamayor-Tomas, S., Fleischman, F. D., Ibarra, I. P., Thiel, A., and van Laerhoven, F. (2014). From Sandoz to salmon: Conceptualizing resource and institutional dynamics in the Rhine watershed through the SES framework. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 361–95.Google Scholar
Vink, M. J., Dewulf, A., and Termeer, C. (2013). The role of knowledge and power in climate change adaptation. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
Viola, E., Franchini, M., and Ribeiro, T. L. (2012). Climate governance in an international system under conservative hegemony: The role of major powers. Revista Brasileira de Politica International, 55, 9–29.Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Gupta, A., Herold, M., Peña-Claros, M., and Vijge, M. J. (2012). Will REDD+ work? The need for interdisciplinary research to address key challenges. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 590–6.Google Scholar
Wallbott, L. (2014). Indigenous peoples in UN REDD+ negotiations: Importing power and lobbying for rights through discursive interplay management. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 21.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Brown, D. G., and Agrawal, A. (2013). Climate adaptation, local institutions, and rural livelihoods: A comparative study of herder communities in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia, China. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1673–83.Google Scholar
Wapner, P. (1995). Politics beyond the state environmental activism and world civic politics, World Politics, 47(3), 311–40.Google Scholar
Wardekker, J., Petersen, A., and van Der Sluijs, J. (2009). Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 512–21.Google Scholar
Wassen, M. J., Runhaar, H., Barendregt, A., and Okruszko, T. (2011). Evaluating the role of participation in modeling studies for environmental planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(2), 338–58.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1925). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 2nd ed., 2 vols. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weber, M., Driessen, P. P., and Runhaar, H. A. (2011). Drivers of and barriers to shifts in governance: Analysing noise policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(2), 119–37.Google Scholar
Weed, M. (2008). A potential method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research: Issues in the development of ‘meta-interpretation’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
Weible, C. M., and Sabatier, P. A., eds. (2017). Theories of the Policy Process, 4th ed. New York, NY: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Welbers, K., Van Atteveldt, W., and Benoit, K. (2017). Text analysis in R. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(4), 245–65.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization, 41(3), 335–70.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werners, S. E., Flachner, Z., Matczak, P., Falaleeva, M., and Leemans, R. (2009). Exploring earth system governance: A case study of floodplain management along the Tisza River in Hungary. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 503–11.Google Scholar
Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., et al. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio, 40, 762–80.Google Scholar
Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., et al. (2013). A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327Google Scholar
Widerberg, O., and Stripple, J. (2016). The expanding field of cooperative initiatives for decarbonization: A review of five databases. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(4), 486–500.Google Scholar
Widman, U. (2016). Exploring the role of public–private partnerships in forest protection. Sustainability, 8(5), 496.Google Scholar
Willer, D., Lovaglia, M., and Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 76(2), 571–603.Google Scholar
Williams, R. H. (1999). Environmental justice in America and its politics of scale. Political Geography, 18(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
Witter, R., Suiseeya, K. R. M., Gruby, R. L., Hitchner, S., Maclin, E. M., Bourque, M., and Brosius, J. P. (2015). Moments of influence in global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 24(6), 894–912.Google Scholar
World Commission on Dams, ed. (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Wuisan, L., van Leeuwen, J., and van Koppen, C. K. (2012). Greening international shipping through private governance: A case study of the Clean Shipping Project. Marine Policy, 36, 165–73.Google Scholar
Wyatt, S., Kessels, M., and van Laerhoven, F. (2015). Indigenous peoples’ expectations for forestry in New Brunswick: Are rights enough? Society & Natural Resources, 28(6), 625–40.Google Scholar
Wyborn, C., and Dovers, S. (2014). Prescribing adaptiveness in agencies of the state. Global Environmental Change, 24, 5–7.Google Scholar
Yengoh, G. T., Steen, K., Armah, F. A., and Ness, B. (2016). Factors of vulnerability: How large-scale land acquisitions take advantage of local and national weaknesses in Sierra Leone. Land Use Policy, 50, 328–40.Google Scholar
Young, J. C., Butler, J. R., Jordan, A., and Watt, A. D. (2012). Less government intervention in biodiversity management: Risks and opportunities. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(4), 1095–100.Google Scholar
Young, J. C., Jordan, A., Searle, K. R., et al. (2013). Framing scale in participatory biodiversity management may contribute to more sustainable solutions. Conservation Letters, 6(5), 333–40.Google Scholar
Young, J. C., Searle, K., Butler, A., et al. (2016). The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts. Biological Conservation, 195, 196–202.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2016a). Governing the antipodes: International cooperation in Antarctica and the Arctic. Polar Record, 52(2), 230–8.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2016b). On Environmental Governance: Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, O. R., Agrawal, A., King, L. A., et al. (1999/2005). Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC) Science Plan. Bonn: IHDP Report Nos. 9, 16.Google Scholar
Young, O. R., King, L. A., Schroeder, H., eds. (2008). Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., and Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: The influence of ‘soft’ power. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(2), 159–78.Google Scholar
Zhao, X., Li, H., Wu, L., and Qi, Y. (2014). Implementation of energy-saving policies in China: How local governments assisted industrial enterprises in achieving energy-saving targets. Energy Policy, 66, 170–84.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×