Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:17:05.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix - ESG–Agency Harvesting Database

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2020

Michele M. Betsill
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Tabitha M. Benney
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Andrea K. Gerlak
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ESG–Agency Articles 2008–2016 (n = 333)

Abbott, K. W. (2008). Enriching rational choice institutionalism for the study of international law. University of Illinois Law Review, 1, 546.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2012). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. International Affairs, 88(3), 543–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W. (2014). Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(1), 5788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W., and Bernstein, S. (2015). The high-level political forum on sustainable development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6(3), 222–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W., and Snidal, D. (2013). Taking responsive regulation transnational: Strategies for international organizations. Regulation and Governance, 7(1), 95113.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., and Hardin, R. (2008). Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 320(5882), 1460–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agterbosch, S., Meertens, R. M., and Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2009). The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(2), 393405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, S. M., Andrachuk, M., and Armitage, D. (2016). Navigating governance networks for community-based conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, S. M., and Armitage, D. (2015). A social relational network perspective for MPA science. Conservation Letters, 8(1), 113.Google Scholar
Andrachuk, M., and Armitage, D. (2015). Understanding social-ecological change and transformation through community perceptions of system identity. Ecology and Society, 20(4), http://dx.doi.org/10.5757/ES-07759.200426.Google Scholar
Anokye, N. A., and Gupta, J. (2012). Reconciling IWRM and water delivery in Ghana: The potential and challenges. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 47, 3345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apostolopoulou, E., Bormpoudakis, D., Paloniemi, R., et al. (2014). Governance rescaling and the neoliberalization of nature: The case of biodiversity conservation in four EU countries. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 21(6), 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apostolopoulou, E., Drakou, E. G., and Pediaditi, K. (2012). Participation in the management of Greek Natura 2000 sites: Evidence from a cross-level analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 308–18.Google Scholar
Apostolopoulou, E., and Pantis, J. D. (2009). Conceptual gaps in the national strategy for the implementation of the European Natura 2000 conservation policy in Greece. Biological Conservation, 142(1), 221–37.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., Béné, C., Charles, A. T., et al. (2012). The interplay of well-being and resilience in applying a social-ecological perspective. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, D., de Loë, R. C., Morris, M., et al. (2015). Science–policy processes for transboundary water governance. Ambio, 44(5), 353–66.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., de Loë, R., and Plummer, R. (2012). Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 5(4), 245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, D., Marschke, M., and Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 8698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auld, G., Renckens, S., and Cashore, B. (2015). Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control. Regulation and Governance, 9(2), 108–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babon, A., McIntyre, D., Gowae, G. Y., Gallemore, C., Carmenta, R., Di Gregorio, M., and Brockhaus, M. (2014). Advocacy coalitions, REDD+, and forest governance in Papua New Guinea: How likely is transformational change? Ecology and Society, 19(3), 1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., and Kylsäter, M. (2014). Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public-private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit. Globalizations, 11(3), 331–47.Google Scholar
Bai, X., McAllister, R. R., Beaty, R. M., and Taylor, B. (2010). Urban policy and governance in a global environment: Complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barau, A. S., and Al Hosani, N. (2015). Prospects of environmental governance in addressing sustainability challenges of seawater desalination industry in the Arabian Gulf. Environmental Science and Policy, 50, 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barau, A. S., and Said, I. (2016). From goodwill to good deals: FELDA land resettlement scheme and the ascendancy of the landless poor in Malaysia. Land Use Policy, 54, 423–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barau, A. S., and Stringer, L. C. (2015). Access to and allocation of ecosystem services in Malaysia’s Pulau Kukup Ramsar site. Ecosystem Services, 16, 167–73.Google Scholar
Barbi, F. (2016). Governing climate change in China and Brazil: Mitigation strategies. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 21(3), 357–70.Google Scholar
Barbi, F., and Ferreira, L. D. C. (2014). Risks and political responses to climate change in Brazilian coastal cities. Journal of Risk Research, 17(4), 485503.Google Scholar
Bartley, T., Andersson, K., Jagger, P., and van Laerhoven, F. (2008). The contribution of institutional theories to explaining decentralization of natural resource governance. Society and Natural Resources, 21(2), 160–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastakoti, R. C., Gupta, J., Babel, M. S., and van Dijk, M. P. (2014). Climate risks and adaptation strategies in the lower Mekong River basin. Regional Environmental Change, 14(1), 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastakoti, R. C., Shivakoti, G. P., and Lebel, L. (2010). Local irrigation management institutions mediate changes driven by external policy and market pressures in Nepal and Thailand. Environmental Management, 46(3), 411–23.Google Scholar
Benecke, E. (2011). Networking for climate change: Agency in the context of renewable energy governance in India. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics, 11(1), 2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berardo, R., Heikkila, T., and Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Interorganizational engagement in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 697719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsma, E., Gupta, J., and Jong, P. (2012). Does individual responsibility increase the adaptive capacity of society? The case of local water management in the Netherlands. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 64(1), 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, T., and Betzold, C. (2012). Civil society in global environmental governance. Journal of Environment and Development, 21(1), 62–6.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(1), 1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S., and Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88(3), 585604.Google Scholar
Betsill, M. M., Pattberg, P., and Dellas, E. (2011). Editorial: Agency in earth systems governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betzold, C., Bernauer, T., and Koubi, V. (2016). Press briefings in international climate change negotiations. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 575–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beunen, R., and Patterson, J. (2016). Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: Exploring the concept of ‘institutional work.’ Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 118, DOI:10.1080/09640568.2016.1257423.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2010). Beyond the intergovernmental regime: Recent trends in global carbon governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(4), 284–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., et al. (2010). Earth system governance: A research framework. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 277–98.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., and Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bixler, R. P. (2014). From community forest management to polycentric governance: Assessing evidence from the bottom. Society and Natural Resources, 27(2), 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, O., and Osterblom, H. (2013). International fisheries regime effectiveness activities and resources of key actors in the Southern Ocean. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 948–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhmelt, T., and Betzold, C. (2013). The impact of environmental interest groups in international negotiations: Do ENGOs induce stronger environmental commitments? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(2), 127–51.Google Scholar
Bork, T., Kraas, F., and Yuan, Y. (2011). Governance challenges in China’s urban health care system: The role of stakeholders. Erdkunde, 65(2), 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouteligier, S. (2011). Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth system governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 4361.Google Scholar
Bowen, K. J., Alexander, D., Miller, F., and Dany, V. (2014). Using social network analysis to evaluate health-related adaptation decision-making in Cambodia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(2), 1605–25.Google Scholar
Bowen, K. J., Ebi, K., Friel, S., and McMichael, A. J. (2013). A multi-layered governance framework for incorporating social science insights into adapting to the health impacts of climate change. Global Health Action, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.21820Google Scholar
Bowen, K. J., Friel, S., Ebi, K., et al. (2012). Governing for a healthy population: Towards an understanding of how decision-making will determine our global health in a changing climate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(1), 5572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, K. J., Miller, F., Dany, V., et al. (2013). Enabling environments? Insights into the policy context for climate change and health adaptation decision-making in Cambodia. Climate and Development, 5(4), 277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, K. J., Miller, F. P., Dany, V., and Graham, S. (2015). The relevance of a coproductive capacity framework to climate change adaptation: Investigating the health and water sectors in Cambodia. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 1324.Google Scholar
Breitmeier, H. A., Underdal, A., and Young, O. R. (2011). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Comparing and contrasting findings from quantitative research. International Studies Review, 13(4), 579–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisbois, M. C., and de Loë, R. C. (2016). State roles and motivations in collaborative approaches to water governance: A power theory-based analysis. Geoforum, 74, 202–12.Google Scholar
Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., and Mardiah, S. (2014). Governing the design of national REDD+: An analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 2333.Google Scholar
Brockhaus, M., Djoudi, H., and Kambire, H. (2012). Multi-level governance and adaptive capacity in West Africa. International Journal of the Commons, 6(2), 200–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, S., and Biermann, F. (2011). Towards adaptive management: Examining strategies of policy entrepreneurs in Dutch water management. Ecology and Society, 16(4), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., and Lessidrenska, T. (2009). The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 182200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., and Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H. (2012). Governance and the geography of authority: Modalities of authorisation and the transnational governing of climate change. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2428–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Bäckstrand, K., et al. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 591612.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., and Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., and Maassen, A. (2013). Low-carbon transitions and the reconfiguration of urban infrastructure. Urban Studies, 51(7), 1471–86.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Luque-Ayala, A., and Silver, J. (2014). Housing and the (re)configuration of energy provision in Cape Town and Sao Paulo: Making space for a progressive urban climate politics? Political Geography,40, 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H., and Schroeder, H. (2012). Beyond state/non-state divides: Global cities and the governing of climate change. European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), 743–66.Google Scholar
Burch, S., Schroeder, H., Rayner, S., and Wilson, J. (2013). Novel multisector networks and entrepreneurship: The role of small businesses in the multilevel governance of climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 822–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadman, T., and Maraseni, T. (2013). More equal than others? A comparative analysis of state and non-state perceptions of interest representation and decision-making in REDD+ negotiations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 214–30.Google Scholar
Cashmore, M., Richardson, T., Rozema, J., and Lyhne, I. (2015). Environmental governance through guidance: The ‘making up’ of expert practitioners. Geoforum, 62, 8495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castán Broto, V., and Bulkeley, H. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 92102.Google Scholar
Certomà, C. (2015). Expanding the ‘dark side of planning’: Governmentality and biopolitics in urban garden planning. Planning Theory, 14(1), 2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S., Brandi, C., and Bauer, S. (2016). The new impacts of the implementation of climate change response measures. Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law, 25(2), 238–47.Google Scholar
Chan, S., and Pattberg, P. (2008). Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: Analyzing global forest governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappin, M. M. H., Vermeulen, W. J. V., Meeus, M. T. H., and Hekkert, M. P. (2009). Enhancing our understanding of the role of environmental policy in environmental innovation: Adoption explained by the accumulation of policy instruments and agent-based factors. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(7), 934–47.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. S., Gerlak, A. K., Dale, L., and Mattor, K. (2015). Examining the adaptability of collaborative governance associated with publicly managed ecosystems over time: Insights from the Front Range Roundtable, Colorado, USA. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 35.Google Scholar
Chhatre, A., and Agrawal, A. (2008). Forest commons and local enforcement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105(36), 13286–91.Google Scholar
Chhatre, A., and Agrawal, A. (2009). Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106(42), 17667–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clapp, J., and Helleiner, E. (2012). Troubled futures? The global food crisis and the politics of agricultural derivatives regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 19(2), 181207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, J. D., and Van de Graaf, T. (2015). Mechanisms of informal governance: Evidence from the IEA. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(4), 455–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, H. F., Benson., D., Inman, A., Jordan, A., and Smith, L. (2012). Catchment management groups in England and Wales: Extent, roles and influences. Water and Environment Journal, 26(1), 4755.Google Scholar
Coolsaet, B., and Pitseys, J. (2015). Fair and equitable negotiations? African influence and the international access and benefit-sharing regime. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 3856.Google Scholar
Corbera, E., and Jover, N. (2012). The undelivered promises of the Clean Development Mechanism: Insights from three projects in Mexico. Carbon Management, 3(1), 3954.Google Scholar
Crona, B., Nystrom, M., Folke, C., and Jiddawi, N. (2010). Middlemen, a critical social-ecological link in coastal communities in Kenya and Zanzibar. Marine Policy, 34(4), 761–71.Google Scholar
Dany, V., Bowen, K. J., and Miller, F. (2015). Assessing the institutional capacity to adapt to climate change: A case study in the Cambodian health and water sectors. Climate Policy, 15(3), 388409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauvergne, P., and Clapp, J. (2016). Researching global environmental politics in the 21st century. Global Environmental Politics, 16(1), 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, S. L., and de Loë, R. C. (2016). The changing role of ENGOs in water governance: Institutional entrepreneurs? Environmental Management, 57(1), 6278.Google Scholar
de Coninck, H., and Bäckstrand, K. (2011). An international relations perspective on the global politics of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 368–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O., Castrejon, M., Perez-Castaneda, R., Castilla, J. C., Gutierrez, N. L., Essington, T. E., and Folke, C. (2016). Co-management in Latin American small-scale shellfisheries: Assessment from long-term case studies. Fish and Fisheries, 17(1), 176–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, A. A., Runhaar, H. A., Runhaar, P. R., Kolhoff, A. J., and Driessen, P. P. (2012). Promoting system-level learning from project-level lessons: An analysis of donor-driven ‘indirect’ learning about EIA systems in Ghana and the Maldives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33(1), 2331.Google Scholar
de la Plaza Esteban, C., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., and de Jong, W. (2014). The legitimacy of certification standards in climate change governance. Sustainable Development, 22(6), 420–32.Google Scholar
Dellas, E., Pattberg, P., and Betsill, M. M. (2011). Agency in earth system governance: Refining a research agenda. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 8598.Google Scholar
de Loë, R. C., Murray, D., and Brisbois, M. C. (2016). Perspectives of natural resource sector firms on collaborative approaches to governance for water. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1117–28.Google Scholar
Di Lucia, L., and Kronsell, A. (2010). The willing, the unwilling and the unable: Explaining implementation of the EU Biofuels Directive. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 545–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djalante, R., Holley, C., and Thomalla, F. (2011). Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2(4), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djalante, R., Thomalla, F., Sinapoy, M. S., and Carnegie, M. (2012). Building resilience to natural hazards in Indonesia: Progress and challenges in implementing the Hyogo Framework for Action. Natural Hazards, 62(3), 779803.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, K. (2010). Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 397416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, J., and Lebel, L. (2010). Deliberation and scale in Mekong region water governance. Environmental Management, 46(1), 6080.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., and Tucker, A. (2008). Deliberative innovation to different effect: Consensus conferences in Denmark, France, and the United States. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 864–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, T., and Corbera, E. (2016). Incentivizing REDD+: How developing countries are laying the groundwork for benefit-sharing. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 4454.Google Scholar
Duyck, S. (2015). Promoting the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums: The case of the UN Climate Change Regime. Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law, 24(2), 123–38.Google Scholar
Dzebo, A., and Stripple, J. (2015). Transnational adaptation governance: An emerging fourth era of adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 423–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, B., Abbott, K. W., Black, J., Meidinger, E., and Wood, S. (2014). Transnational business governance interactions: Conceptualization and framework for analysis. Regulation & Governance, 8, 121.Google Scholar
Ekstrom, J. A., Young, O. R., Gaines, S. D., et al. (2009). A tool to navigate overlaps in fragmented ocean governance. Marine Policy, 33(3), 532–5.Google Scholar
Feitelson, E., and Fischhendler, I. (2009). Spaces of water governance: The case of Israel and its neighbors. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 728–45.Google Scholar
Freed, S., Dujon, V., Granek, E. F., and Mouhhidine, J. (2016). Enhancing small-scale fisheries management through community engagement and multi-community partnerships: Comoros case study. Marine Policy, 63, 8191.Google Scholar
Freed, S., and Granek, E. F. (2014). Effects of human activities on the world’s most vulnerable coral reefs: Comoros case study. Coastal Management, 42(3), 280–96.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., and Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 353–67.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, T., Hyakumura, K., Henry, S., and Cadman, T. (2016). Does REDD+ Ensure sectoral coordination and stakeholder participation? A comparative analysis of REDD+ national governance structures in countries of Asia-Pacific Region. Forests, 7 (9), 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielsson, S., and Ramasar, V. (2013). Widows: Agents of change in a climate of water uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60, 3442.Google Scholar
Galaz, V., Biermann, F., Crona, B., et al. (2012). ‘Planetary boundaries’—exploring the challenges for global environmental governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 80–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galaz, V., Österblom, H., Bodin, Ö., and Crona, B. (2016). Global networks and global change-induced tipping points. International Environmental Agreements, 16(2), 189221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallemore, C., Di Gregorio, M., Moeliono, M., et al. (2015). Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 114, 168–79.Google Scholar
Gallemore, C., and Jespersen, K. (2016). Transnational markets for sustainable development governance: The case of REDD+. World Development, 86, 7994.Google Scholar
Gallemore, C., and Munroe, D. K. (2013). Centralization in the global avoided deforestation collaboration network. Global Environmental Change, 23, 11991210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, T., Oberthur, S., and Muehleck, M. (2013). European Union actorness in International institutions: Why the EU is recognized as an actor in some international institutions, but not in others. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(5), 849–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelcich, S., Hughes, T. P., Olsson, P., et al. (2010). Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107(39), 16794–9.Google Scholar
Gellers, J. C. (2016). Crowdsourcing global governance: Sustainable development goals, civil society, and the pursuit of democratic legitimacy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics Law and Economics, 16(3), 415–32.Google Scholar
Gerhardinger, L. C., Godoy, E. A. S., and Jones, P. J. S. (2009). Local ecological knowledge and the management of marine protected areas in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Management, 3(4), 154–65.Google Scholar
Gerhardinger, L. C., Godoy, E. A. S., Jones, P. J. S., Sales, G., and Ferreira, B. P. (2011). Marine protected dramas: The flaws of the Brazilian national system of marine protected areas. Environmental Management, 47(4), 630–43.Google Scholar
Gerlak, A. K., and Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades Restoration Program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, A., Fletcher, S., Rumsey, M., et al. (2014). Disasters and climate change in the Pacific: Adaptive capacity of humanitarian response organizations. Climate and Development, 7(1), 3546.Google Scholar
Giri, K., and Darnhofer, I. (2010). Nepali women using community forestry as a platform for social change. Society & Natural Resources, 23(12), 1216–29.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. J. (2016a). Lament for a network? Cities and networked climate governance in Canada. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(3), 529–45.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. J. (2016b). The politics of accountability in networked urban climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 82100.Google Scholar
Grothmann, T., Grecksch, K., Winges, M., and Siebenhuener, B. (2013). Assessing institutional capacities to adapt to climate change: Integrating psychological dimensions in the adaptive capacity wheel. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(12), 3369–84.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. (2011). An evolving science-society contract in India: The search for legitimacy in anticipatory risk governance. Food Policy, 36(6), 736–41.Google Scholar
Gupta, A., Pistorius, T., and Vijge, M. J. (2016). Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance: The REDD + Partnership as bridge organization. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16, 355–74.Google Scholar
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., et al. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 459–71.Google Scholar
Hage, M., Leroy, P., and Petersen, A. C. (2010). Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production. Futures, 42(3), 254–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerman, S., Witter, R., Corson, C., et al. (2012). On the coattails of climate? Opportunities and threats of a warming earth for biodiversity conservation. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 724–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, T. (2011). Self-organized governance networks for ecosystem management: Who is accountable? Ecology and Society, 16(2), www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art18Google Scholar
Hausknost, D. (2014). Decision, choice, solution: ‘Agentic deadlock’ in environmental politics. Environmental Politics, 23(3), 357–75.Google Scholar
Heubaum, H., and Biermann, F. (2015). Integrating global energy and climate governance: The changing role of the International Energy Agency. Energy Policy 87, 229–39.Google Scholar
Heuer, M. (2012). Sustainability governance across time and space: Connecting environmental stewardship in the firm with the global community. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 8697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, K., and Niemeyer, S. (2011). Public responses to climate change: The role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 957–71.Google Scholar
Hultman, N. E., Malone, E. L., Runci, P., Carlock, G., and Anderson, K. L. (2012). Factors in low-carbon energy transformations: Comparing nuclear and bioenergy in Brazil, Sweden, and the United States. Energy Policy, 40, 131–46.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, M. (2009). The adaptation of water law to climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 1(3), 230–40.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, M. (2014). Adaptive institutional design in agri-environmental programs. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 6(2), 145–65.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, M., Corkal, D. R., Warren, J., and Diaz, H. (2009). Climate change and water governance in Saskatchewan, Canada. International Journal of Climate Change Strategy and Management, 1(2), 118–32.Google Scholar
Ivanova, M. (2010). UNEP in global environmental governance: Design, leadership, location. Global Environmental Politics, 10(1), 3059.Google Scholar
Jacobs, K., Lebel, L., Buizer, J., et al. (2016). Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the USA, 113(17), 4591–6.Google Scholar
Jedd, T., and Bixler, R. P. (2015). Accountability in networked governance: Learning from a case of landscape-scale forest conservation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(3), 172–87.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S. (2010). Overlap management in the World Trade Organization: Secretariat influence on trade-environment politics. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 5479.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S. (2011). Marketing linkages: Secretariat governance of the climate-biodiversity interface. Global Environmental Politics, 11(3), 2343.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S., and Lindsay, A. (2015). Secretariat influence on overlap management politics in North America: NAFTA and the commission for environmental cooperation. Review of Policy Research, 32(1), 124–45.Google Scholar
Jodoin, S., Duyck, S., and Lofts, K. (2015). Public participation and climate governance: An introduction. Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law, 24(2), 117–22.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., and Huitema, D. (2014). Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change, 29, 387394.Google Scholar
Kabiri, N. (2016). Public participation, land use and climate change governance in Thailand. Land Use Policy, 52, 511–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalfagianni, A., and Pattberg, P. (2013). Participation and inclusiveness in private rule setting organisations: Does it really matter for effectiveness? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 231–50.Google Scholar
Kameyama, Y., Morita, K., and Kubota, I. (2016). Finance for achieving low-carbon development in Asia: The past, present, and prospects for the future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128, 201–8.Google Scholar
Kanie, N., Betsill, M. M., Zondervan, R., Biermann, F., and Young, O. R. (2012). A charter moment: Restructuring governance for sustainability. Public Administration and Development, 32, 292304.Google Scholar
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., and McGee, J. (2013). Legitimacy in an era of fragmentation: The case of global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 5678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., and van Asselt, H. (2009). Introduction: Exploring and explaining the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(3), 195211.Google Scholar
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., and Vihma, A. (2009). Comparing the legitimacy and effectiveness of global hard and soft law: An analytical framework. Regulation and Governance, 3(4), 400–20.Google Scholar
Kern, F., Gaede, J., Meadowcroft, J., and Watson, J. (2016). The political economy of carbon capture and storage: An analysis of two demonstration projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 250–60.Google Scholar
Klein, I., and Fischhendler, I. (2015). The pitfalls of implementing Host Community Compensation: A power balance perspective. Land Use Policy, 49, 499510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Chobotova, V., and Smolkova, E. (2013). The challenges of policy convergence: The Europeanization of biodiversity governance in an enlarging EU. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(3), 401–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivurova, T., Kokko, K., Duyck, S., Sellheim, N., and Stepien, A. (2012). The present and future competence of the European Union in the Arctic. Polar Record, 48(247), 361–71.Google Scholar
Kolhoff, A. J., Driessen, P. P. J., and Runhaar, H. A. C. (2013). An analysis framework for characterizing and explaining development of EIA legislation in developing countries—Illustrated for Georgia, Ghana and Yemen. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 115.Google Scholar
Kolhoff, A. J., Runhaar, H. A., Gugushvili, T., et al. (2016). The influence of actor capacities on EIA system performance in low and middle income countries: Cases from Georgia and Ghana. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 57, 167–77.Google Scholar
Kramarz, T. (2016). World Bank partnerships and the promise of democratic governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(1), 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramarz, T., and Momani, B. (2013). The World Bank as knowledge bank: Analyzing the limits of a legitimate global knowledge actor. Review of Policy Research, 30(4), 409–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramarz, T., and Park, S. (2016). Accountability in global environmental governance: A meaningful tool for action? Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 121.Google Scholar
Kunseler, E. M., Tuinstra, W., Vasileiadou, E., and Petersen, A. C. (2015). The reflective futures practitioner: Balancing salience, credibility and legitimacy in generating foresight knowledge with stakeholders. Futures, 66, 112.Google Scholar
Kuzdas, C., and Wiek, A. (2014). Governance scenarios for addressing water conflicts and climate change impacts. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, 181–96.Google Scholar
Kuzdas, C., Wiek, A., Warner, B., Vignola, R., and Morataya, R. (2014). Sustainability appraisal of water governance regimes: The case of Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Environmental Management, 54(2), 205–22.Google Scholar
Kuzdas, C., Wiek, A., Warner, B., Vignola, R., and Morataya, R. (2015). Integrated and participatory analysis of water governance regimes: The case of the Costa Rican dry tropics. World Development, 66, 254–68.Google Scholar
Larson, S., Alexander, K. S., Djalante, R., and Kirono, D. G. C. (2013). The added value of understanding informal social networks in an adaptive capacity assessment: Explorations of an urban water management system in Indonesia. Water Resources Management, 27(13), 4425–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebel, L., Grothmann, T., and Siebenhüner, B. (2010). The role of social learning in adaptiveness: Insights from water management. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 333–53.Google Scholar
Lebel, L., Wattana, S., and Talerngsri, P. (2015). Assessments of ecosystem services and human well-being in Thailand build and create demand for coproductive capacity. Ecology and Society, 20(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06527-200112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebel, L., Xu, J., Bastakoti, R. C., and Lamba, A. (2010). Pursuits of adaptiveness in the shared rivers of Monsoon Asia. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 355–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebel, P., Sriyasak, P., Kallayanamitra, C., Duangsuwan, C., and Lebel, L. (2016). Learning about climate-related risks: Decisions of Northern Thailand fish farmers in a role-playing simulation game. Regional Environmental Change, 16(5), 1481–94.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., Primavera, J. H., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., et al. (2014). Ecological role and services of tropical mangrove ecosystems: A reassessment. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23(7), 726–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesage, D., and Van de Graaf, T. (2013). Thriving in complexity? The OECD system’s role in energy and taxation. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 19(1), 8392.Google Scholar
Lesage, D., Van de Graaf, T., and Westphal, K. (2009). The G8’s role in global energy governance since the 2005 Gleneagles summit. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 15(2), 259–77.Google Scholar
Leventon, J. (2015). Explaining implementation deficits through multi-level governance in the EU’s new member states: EU limits for arsenic in drinking water in Hungary. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(7), 1137–53.Google Scholar
Leventon, J., Dyer, J. C., and Van Alstine, J. D. (2015). The private sector in climate governance: Opportunities for climate compatible development through multilevel industry-government engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 316–23.Google Scholar
Leventon, J., Fleskens, L., Claringbould, H., et al. (2016). An applied methodology for stakeholder identification in transdisciplinary research. Sustainability Science, 11(5), 763–75.Google Scholar
Leventon, J., Kalaba, F. K., Dyer, J. C., Stringer, L. C., and Dougill, A. J. (2014). Delivering community benefits through REDD+: Lessons from joint forest management in Zambia. Forest Policy and Economics, 44, 1017.Google Scholar
Liu, L., Matsuno, S., Zhang, B., Liu, B., and Young, O. R. (2013). Local governance on climate mitigation: A comparative study of China and Japan. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 475–89.Google Scholar
Lund, E. (2013). Who is driving? Public and private agency in the implementation of the CDM. Carbon Management, 4(1), 5768.Google Scholar
Marks, D., and Lebel, L. (2016). Disaster governance and the scalar politics of incomplete decentralization: Fragmented and contested responses to the 2011 floods in central Thailand. Habitat International, 52, 5766.Google Scholar
Mathur, V. N., Afionis, S., Paavola, J., et al. (2014). Experiences of host communities with carbon market projects: Towards multi-level climate justice. Climate Policy, 14(1), 4262.Google Scholar
Mattor, K., Betsill, M. M., Huber-Stearns, H., et al. (2014). Transdisciplinary research on environmental governance: A view from the inside. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, 90100.Google Scholar
Mauerhofer, V. (2013). The ‘governance-check’: Assessing the sustainability of public spatial decision-making structures. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 328–36.Google Scholar
Mauerhofer, V., Kim, R. E., and Stevens, C. (2015). When implementation works: A comparison of Ramsar Convention implementation in different continents. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 95105.Google Scholar
McDermott, C. L., Coad, L., Helfgott, A., and Schroeder, H. (2012). Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: Actors, interests and ideas. Environmental Science and Policy 21, 6372.Google Scholar
McGuirk, P. M., Bulkeley, H., and Dowling, R. (2016). Configuring urban carbon governance: Insights from Sydney, Australia. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(1), 145–66.Google Scholar
Mees, H. L. P., Driessen, P. P. J., and Runhaar, H. A. C. (2012). Exploring the scope of public and private responsibilities for climate adaptation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(3), 305–30.Google Scholar
Mees, H. L. P., Driessen, P. P. J., and Runhaar, H. A. C. (2014). Legitimate adaptive flood risk governance beyond the dikes: The cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam. Regional Environmental Change, 14(2), 671–82.Google Scholar
Meissner, R., and Ramasar, V. (2015). Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River Basin, South Africa. Geo Journal, 80(5), 689709.Google Scholar
Menga, F., and Mirumachi, N. (2016). Fostering Tajik hydraulic development: Examining the role of soft power in the case of the Rogun Dam. Water Alternatives, 9(2), 373–88.Google Scholar
Merme, V., Ahlers, R., and Gupta, J. (2014). Private equity, public affair: Hydropower financing in the Mekong Basin. Global Environmental Change, 24, 20–9.Google Scholar
Mert, A. (2014). Hybrid governance mechanisms as political instruments: The case of sustainability partnerships. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics, 14(3), 225–44.Google Scholar
Milkoreit, M. (2015). Hot deontology and cold consequentialism: An empirical exploration of ethical reasoning among climate change negotiators. Climatic Change, 130(3), 397409.Google Scholar
Milkoreit, M., Moore, M. L., Schoon, M., and Meek, C. L. (2015). Resilience scientists as change-makers-growing the middle ground between science and advocacy? Environmental Science and Policy, 53, 8795.Google Scholar
Mirumachi, N., and Torriti, J. (2012). The use of public participation and economic appraisal for public involvement in large-scale hydropower projects: Case study of the Nam Theun 2 Hydropower Project. Energy Policy, 47, 125–32.Google Scholar
Mirumachi, N., and Van Wyk, E. (2010). Cooperation at different scales: Challenges for local and international water resource governance in South Africa. Geographical Journal, 176(1), 2538.Google Scholar
Morin, J. F. (2010). The two-level game of transnational networks: The case of the access to medicines campaign. International Interactions, 36(4), 309–34.Google Scholar
Mukhtarov, F., Brock, A., Janssen, S., and Guignier, A. (2013). Actors and strategies in translating global conservation narratives to Vietnam: An agency perspective. Policy and Society, 32(2), 113–24.Google Scholar
Mukhtarov, F., and Gerlak, A. K. (2013). River basin organizations in the global water discourse: An exploration of agency and strategy. Global Governance, 19(2), 307–26.Google Scholar
Mulyani, M., and Jepson, P. (2015). Social learning through a REDD+ ‘village agreement’: Insights from the KFCP in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56(1), 7995.Google Scholar
Munaretto, S., and Battilani, A. (2014). Irrigation water governance in practice: The case of the Canale Emiliano Romagnolo district, Italy. Water Policy, 16(3), 578–94.Google Scholar
Munaretto, S., and Huitema, D. (2012). Adaptive comanagement in the Venice lagoon? An analysis of current water and environmental management practices and prospects for change. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 19.Google Scholar
Naess, L. O., Newell, P., Newsham, A., Phillips, J., Quane, J., and Tanner, T. (2015). Climate policy meets national development contexts: Insights from Kenya and Mozambique. Global Environmental Change, 35, 534–44.Google Scholar
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., and Linner, B. O. (2016). The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics, 16(1), 109–26.Google Scholar
Nayak, P., Armitage, D., and Andrachuk, M. (2016). Power and politics of social-ecological regime shifts in the Chilika lagoon, India and Tam Giang lagoon, Vietnam. Regional Environmental Change, 16(2), 325–39.Google Scholar
Newell, P. (2008). Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 122–53.Google Scholar
Newell, P. (2009). Bio-hegemony: The political economy of agricultural biotechnology in Argentina. Journal of Latin American Studies, 41(1), 2757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, P., Bulkeley, H., Turner, K., et al. (2015). Governance traps in climate change politics: Re-framing the debate in terms of responsibilities and rights. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(6), 535–40.Google Scholar
Newell, P., Phillips, J., and Purohit, P. (2011). The political economy of clean development in India: CDM and beyond. IDS Bulletin, 42(3), 8996.Google Scholar
Newton, P., Agrawal, A., and Wollenberg, L. (2013). Enhancing the sustainability of commodity supply chains in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1761–72.Google Scholar
Newton, P., Miller, D. C., Byenkya, M. A. A., and Agrawal, A. (2016). Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions. Land Use Policy, 57, 388–95.Google Scholar
Newton, P., Schaap, B., Fournier, M., et al. (2015). Community forest management and REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics, 56, 2737.Google Scholar
Obani, P., and Gupta, J. (2016). Human right to sanitation in the legal and non-legal literature: The need for greater synergy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3(5), 678–91.Google Scholar
Obani, P., and Ogbodo, S. G. (2013). Strengthening the national institutional framework for environmental migration through sustainable development. Hong Kong Law Journal, 43(3), 897916.Google Scholar
Ogier, E. M., Davidson, J., Fidelman, P., et al. (2016). Fisheries management approaches as platforms for climate change adaptation: Comparing theory and practice in Australian fisheries. Marine Policy, 71, 8293.Google Scholar
Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., and Schroeder, H. (2009). Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 5878.Google Scholar
Okereke, C., and Coventry, P. (2016). Climate justice and the International regime: Before, during, and after Paris. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(6), 834–51.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Hughes, T. P. (2008). Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105(28), 9489–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsson, L., and Jerneck, A. (2010). Farmers fighting climate change: From victims to agents in subsistence livelihoods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 363–73.Google Scholar
Orsini, A. (2012). Business as a regulatory leader for risk governance? The compact initiative for liability and redress under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Environmental Politics, 21(6), 960–79.Google Scholar
Orsini, A. (2013). Multi-forum non-state actors: Navigating the regime complexes for forestry and genetic resources. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 3455.Google Scholar
Orsini, A., Morin, J. F., and Young, O. R. (2013). Regime complexes: A buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance? Global Governance, 19, 2739.Google Scholar
Österblom, H., and Folke, C. (2015). Globalization, marine regime shifts and the Soviet Union. Philosophical Transactions B, 370(1659), https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0278Google Scholar
Österblom, H., Jouffray, J.-B., Folke, C., Crona, B., Troell, M., Merrie, A., and Rockström, J. (2015). Transnational corporations as ‘keystone actors’ in marine ecosystems. PLoS ONE, 10(5), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127533Google Scholar
Österblom, H., and Sumaila, U. R. (2011). Toothfish crises, actor diversity and the emergence of compliance mechanisms in the Southern Ocean. Global Environmental Change, 21, 972–82.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C., Lebel, L., Knieper, C., and Nikitina, E. (2012). From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 2434.Google Scholar
Paloniemi, R., Apostolopoulou, E., Primmer, E., et al. (2012). Biodiversity conservation across scales: Lessons from a science-policy dialogue. Nature Conservation-Bulgaria, 2, 719.Google Scholar
Paloniemi, R., Apostolopoulou, E., Primmer, E., et al. (2015). Public participation and environmental justice in biodiversity governance in Finland, Greece, Poland and the UK. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(5), 330–42.Google Scholar
Papa, M., and Gleason, N. W. (2012). Major emerging powers in sustainable development diplomacy: Assessing their leadership potential. Global Environmental Change, 22, 915–24.Google Scholar
Partzsch, L., and Ziegler, R. (2011). Social entrepreneurs as change agents: A case study on power and authority in the water sector. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(1), 6383.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. (2012). How climate change became a business risk: Analyzing nonstate agency in global climate politics. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 613–26.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P., and Stripple, J. (2008). Beyond the public and private divide: Remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 367–88.Google Scholar
Pattberg, P., and Widerberg, O. (2015). Theorising global environmental governance: Key findings and future questions. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 684705.Google Scholar
Pavese, C. B., and Torney, D. (2012). The contribution of the European Union to global climate change governance: Explaining the conditions for EU actorness. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 55, 125–43.Google Scholar
Persha, L., Agrawal, A., and Chhatre, A. (2011). Social and ecological synergy: Local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science, 331(6024), 1606–8.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, E., and Leentvaar, J. (2013). Knowledge leads, policy follows? Two speeds of collaboration in river basin management. Water Policy, 15, 282–99.Google Scholar
Pickering, J., Skovgaard, J., Kim, S., et al. (2015). Acting on climate finance pledges: Inter-agency dynamics and relationships with aid in contributor states. World Development, 68, 149–62.Google Scholar
Pittman, J., Armitage, D., Alexander, S., and Campbell, D. (2015). Governance fit for climate change in a Caribbean coastal-marine context. Marine Policy, 51, 486–98.Google Scholar
Plummer, R., Armitage, D., and de Loë, R. C. (2013), Adaptive comanagement and its relationship to environmental governance. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 21.Google Scholar
Prno, J., Bradshaw, B., Wandel, J., Pearce, T., Smit, B., and Tozer, L. (2011). Community vulnerability to climate change in the context of other exposure-sensitivities in Kugluktuk, Nunavut. Polar Research, 30(1), 7363.Google Scholar
Pu, X. A., Cheng, H. G., Gong, L., et al. (2011). Revision of three-stakeholder signalling games for environmental impact assessment in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(2), 129–35.Google Scholar
Qi, Y., and Zhang, L. (2014). Local environmental enforcement constrained by central–local relations in China. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(3), 216–32.Google Scholar
Rayner, T., and Jordan, A. (2013). The European Union: The polycentric climate policy leader? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(2), 7590.Google Scholar
Renaud, F. G., Dun, O., Warner, K., and Bogardi, J. (2011). A decision framework for environmentally induced migration. International Migration, 49, e5e29.Google Scholar
Rindefjäll, T., Lund, E., and Stripple, J. (2011). Wine, fruit, and emission reductions: The CDM as development strategy in Chile. International Environmental Agreements, 11(1), 722.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. W., and Berkes, F. (2011). Multi-level participation for building adaptive capacity: Formal agency-community interactions in northern Kenya. Global Environmental Change—Human and Policy Dimensions, 21(4), 1185–94.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. W., and Makupa, E. (2015). Using analysis of governance to unpack community-based conservation: A case study from Tanzania. Environmental Management, 56(5), 1214–27.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D., Berton, H., and Meadowcroft, J. (2016). Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada. Research Policy, 45(6), 1275–90.Google Scholar
Rosendal, K., and Andresen, S. (2016). Realizing access and benefit sharing from use of genetic resources between diverging international regimes: The scope for leadership. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(4), 579–96.Google Scholar
Rozema, J. G., Bond, A. J., Cashmore, M., and Chilvers, J. (2012). An investigation of environmental and sustainability discourses associated with the substantive purposes of environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33(1), 8090.Google Scholar
Rozema, J. G., Cashmore, M., Bond, A. J., and Chilvers, J. (2015). Respatialization and local protest strategy formation: Investigating high-speed rail megaproject development in the UK. Geoforum, 59, 98108.Google Scholar
Rumsey, M., Fletcher, S. M., Thiessen, J., et al. (2014). A qualitative examination of the health workforce needs during climate change disaster response in Pacific island countries. Human Resources for Health, 12(1), 9.Google Scholar
Runhaar, H. (2009). Putting SEA in context: A discourse perspective on how SEA contributes to decision-making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(3), 200–9.Google Scholar
Sanz, M., Siebel, M. A., Ahlers, R., and Gupta, J. (2016). New approaches to cleaner production: Applying the Sasi method to micro-tanneries in Colombia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 963–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlyter, P., Stjernquist, I., and Bäckstrand, K. (2009). Not seeing the forest for the trees? The environmental effectiveness of forest certification in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(56), 375–82.Google Scholar
Schouten, G., and Glasbergen, P. (2012). Private multi-stakeholder governance in the agricultural market place: An analysis of legitimization processes of the roundtables on sustainable palm oil and responsible soy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(B), 6388.Google Scholar
Schouten, G., Leroy, P., and Glasbergen, P. (2012). On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The roundtables on responsible soy and sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics, 83, 4250.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H. (2010). Agency in international climate negotiations: The case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 317–32.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H., Burch, S., and Rayner, S. (2013). Novel multisector networks and entrepreneurship in urban climate governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 761–8.Google Scholar
Schroeder, H., and Lovell, H. (2012). The role of non-nation-state actors and side events in the international climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 12(1), 2337.Google Scholar
Schultz, L., Folke, C., Osterblom, H., and Olsson, P. (2015). Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 112(24), 7369–74.Google Scholar
Scolobig, A., Komendantova, N., Patt, A., et al. (2014). Multi-risk governance for natural hazards in Naples and Guadeloupe. Natural Hazards, 72(3), 1523–45.Google Scholar
Seitzinger, S. P., Svedin, U., Crumley, C. L., et al. (2012). Planetary stewardship in an urbanizing world: Beyond city limits. Ambio, 41(8), 787–94.Google Scholar
Siebenhüner, B. (2008). Learning in international organizations in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 92116.Google Scholar
Siebenhüner, B., Rodela, R., and Ecker, F. (2016). Social learning research in ecological economics: A survey. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 116–26.Google Scholar
Simpson, A., and Park, S. (2013). The Asian Development Bank as a global risk regulator in Myanmar. Third World Quarterly, 34(10), 1858–71.Google Scholar
Simpson, S., Brown, G., Peterson, A., and Johnstone, R. (2016). Stakeholder perspectives for coastal ecosystem services and influences on value integration in policy. Ocean and Coastal Management, 126, 921.Google Scholar
Smits, C. C. A., van Tatenhove, J. P. M., and van Leeuwen, J. (2014). Authority in Arctic governance: Changing spheres of authority in Greenlandic offshore oil and gas developments. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 14(4), 329–48.Google Scholar
Smits, M., and Middleton, C. (2014). New arenas of engagement at the water governance-climate finance nexus? An analysis of the boom and bust of hydropower CDM projects in Vietnam. Water Alternatives, 7(3), 561–83.Google Scholar
Sofronova, E., Holley, C., and Nagarajan, V. (2014). Environmental non-governmental organizations and Russian environmental governance: Accountability, participation and collaboration. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(2), 341–71.Google Scholar
Somorin, O. A., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Arts, B., et al. (2014). REDD+ policy strategy in Cameroon: Actors, institutions and governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 35, 8797.Google Scholar
Sova, C., Vervoort, J., Thornton, T., et al. (2015a). Exploring farmer preference shaping in international agricultural climate change adaptation regimes. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 463–74.Google Scholar
Sova, C. A., Helfgott, A., Chaudhury, A. S., et al. (2015b). Multi-level stakeholder influence mapping: Visualizing power relations across actor levels in Nepal’s agricultural climate change adaptation regime. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28, 383409.Google Scholar
Spagnuolo, F. (2011). Diversity and pluralism in earth system governance: Contemplating the role for global administrative law. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1875–81.Google Scholar
Spruijt, P., Knol, A. B., Vasileiadou, E., Devilee, J., Lebret, E., and Petersen, A. C. (2014). Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, 40, 1625.Google Scholar
Sternlieb, F., Bixler, R. P., Huber-Stearns, H., and Huayhuaca, C. (2013). A question of fit: Reflections on boundaries, organizations and social-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 117–25.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H., and Dryzek, J. S. (2012). The discursive democratisation of global climate governance. Environmental Politics, 21(2), 189210.Google Scholar
Stoett, P., and Temby, O. (2015). Bilateral and trilateral natural resource and biodiversity governance in North America: Organizations, networks, and inclusion. Review of Policy Research, 32(1), 118.Google Scholar
Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Dyer, J. C., et al. (2014). Advancing climate compatible development: Lessons from southern Africa. Regional Environmental Change, 14(2), 713–25.Google Scholar
Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gullberg, A. T., and Sartor, O. (2016). Shaping the “energy union”: Between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(5), 548–67.Google Scholar
Taplin, R., and McGee, J. (2010). The Asia-Pacific Partnership: Implementation challenges and interplay with Kyoto. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 1622.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. L. (2012). Multiple forest activities, multiple purpose organizations: Organizing for complexity in a grassroots movement in Guatemala’s Petén. Forest Ecology and Management, 268, 2938.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. L., and Cheng, A. (2012). Environmental governance as embedded process: Managing change in two community-based forestry organizations. Human Organization, 71(1), 110–22.Google Scholar
Termeer, C., Biesbroek, R., and Van den Brink, M. (2012). Institutions for adaptation to climate change: Comparing national adaptation strategies in Europe. European Political Science, 11(1), 4153.Google Scholar
Thaler, T. (2014). Developing partnership approaches for flood risk management: Implementation of inter-local co-operations in Austria. Water International, 39(7), 1018–29.Google Scholar
Thaler, T., and Levin-Keitel, M. (2016). Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management—A question of roles and power: Lessons from England. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 292301.Google Scholar
Thaler, T., and Priest, S. (2014). Partnership funding in flood risk management: New localism debate and policy in England. Area, 46(4), 418–25.Google Scholar
Thomson, I., Dey, C., and Russell, S. (2015). Activism, arenas and accounts in conflicts over tobacco control. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 809–45.Google Scholar
Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341–63.Google Scholar
Tiwari, P. C., and Joshi, B. (2015). Local and regional institutions and environmental governance in Hindu Kush Himalaya. Environmental Science & Policy, 49, 6674.Google Scholar
Uittenbroek, C. J., Janssen-Jansen, L. B., and Runhaar, H. A. C. (2016). Stimuli for climate adaptation in cities: Insights from Philadelphia – An early adapter. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8(1), 3856.Google Scholar
Underdal, A., Hovi, J., Kallbekken, S., and Skodvin, T. (2012). Can conditional commitments break the climate change negotiations deadlock? International Political Science Review, 33(4), 475–93.Google Scholar
Uppanunchai, A., Apirumanekul, C., and Lebel, L. (2015). Planning for production of freshwater fish fry in a variable climate in northern Thailand. Environmental Management, 56(4), 859–73.Google Scholar
Urpelainen, J., and Van de Graaf, T. (2015). The international renewable energy agency: A success story in institutional innovation? International Environmental Agreement: Politics, Law and Economics, 15(2), 159–77.Google Scholar
van Asselt, H., Kanie, N., and Iguchi, M. (2009). Japan’s position in international climate policy: Navigating between Kyoto and the APP. International Environmental Agreements, 9(3), 319–36.Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, T. (2012). Obsolete or resurgent? The International Energy Agency in a changing global landscape. Energy Policy, 48, 233–41.Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, T., and Lesage, D. (2009). The International Energy Agency after 35 years: Reform needs and institutional adaptability. The Review of International Organizations, 4, 293317.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, J. (2010). One task, a few approaches, many impacts: Private-sector involvement in Canadian building code enforcement. Canadian Public Administration, 53(3), 351–74.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, J. (2015). The role of government in voluntary environmental programmes: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Public Administration, 93(3), 576–92.Google Scholar
van Kerkhoff, L. E., and Lebel, L. (2015). Coproductive capacities: Rethinking science-governance relations in a diverse world. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 14.Google Scholar
van Laerhoven, F. (2014). When is participatory local environmental governance likely to emerge? A study of collective action in participatory municipal environmental councils in Brazil. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(2), 7793.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, J. (2015). The regionalization of maritime governance: Towards a polycentric governance system for sustainable shipping in the European Union. Ocean & Coastal Management, 117, 2331.Google Scholar
van Stigt, R., Driessen, P. P. J., and Spit, T. J. (2016). Steering urban environmental quality in a multi-level governance context. How can devolution be the solution to pollution? Land Use Policy, 50, 268–76.Google Scholar
van Tatenhove, J., Raakjae, J., van Leeuwen, J., and van Hoof, L. (2014). Regional cooperation for European seas: Governance models in support of the implementation of the MFSD, Marine Policy, 50, 364–72.Google Scholar
Vasileiadou, E., Hisschemoller, M., Petersen, A. C., et al. (2014). Adaptation to extreme weather: Identifying different societal perspectives in the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 14(1), 91101.Google Scholar
Vasileiadou, E., and Safarzńyska, K. (2010). Transitions: Taking complexity seriously. Futures, 42(10), 1176–86.Google Scholar
Vijge, M. J. (2013). The promise of new institutionalism: Explaining the absence of a World or United Nations Environment Organisation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(2), 153–76.Google Scholar
Villamayor-Tomas, S., Fleischman, F. D., Ibarra, I. P., et al. (2014). From Sandoz to salmon: Conceptualizing resource and institutional dynamics in the Rhine watershed through the SES framework. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 361–95.Google Scholar
Viola, E., and Franchini, M. (2014). Brazilian climate politics 2005–2012: Ambivalence and paradox. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(5), 677–88.Google Scholar
Viola, E., Franchini, M., and Ribeiro, T. L. (2012). Climate governance in an international system under conservative hegemony: The role of major powers. Revista Brasileira de Politica International, 55, 929.Google Scholar
Wallbott, L. (2014). Indigenous peoples in UN REDD+ negotiations: Importing power and lobbying for rights through discursive interplay management. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 21.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Brown, D. G., and Agrawal, A. (2013). Climate adaptation, local institutions, and rural livelihoods: A comparative study of herder communities in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia, China. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1673–83.Google Scholar
Ward, P. J., Pauw, W. P., van Buuren, M. W., and Marfai, M. A. (2013). Governance of flood risk management in a time of climate change: The cases of Jakarta and Rotterdam. Environmental Politics, 22(3), 518–36.Google Scholar
Wassen, M. J., Runhaar, H., Barendregt, A., and Okruszko, T. (2011). Evaluating the role of participation in modeling studies for environmental planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(2), 338–58.Google Scholar
Weber, M., Driessen, P. P., and Runhaar, H. A. (2011). Drivers of and barriers to shifts in governance: Analysing noise policy in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(2), 119–37.Google Scholar
Webster, D. G. (2015). The action cycle/structural context framework: A fisheries approach. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 33.Google Scholar
Werners, S. E., Flachner, Z., Matczak, P., et al. (2009). Exploring earth system governance: A case study of floodplain management along the Tisza River in Hungary. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 503–11.Google Scholar
Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., et al. (2013). A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327Google Scholar
Widerberg, O., and Stripple, J. (2016). The expanding field of cooperative initiatives for decarbonization: A review of five databases. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(4), 486500.Google Scholar
Widerberg, O., and van Laerhoven, F. (2014). Measuring the autonomous influence of an international bureaucracy: The Division for Sustainable Development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 14(4), 303–27.Google Scholar
Widman, U. (2016). Exploring the role of public–private partnerships in forest protection. Sustainability, 8(5), 496.Google Scholar
Witter, R., Suiseeya, K. R. M., Gruby, R. L., et al. (2015). Moments of influence in global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 24(6), 894912.Google Scholar
Wuisan, L., van Leeuwen, J., and van Koppen, C. K. (2012). Greening international shipping through private governance: A case study of the Clean Shipping Project. Marine Policy, 36, 165–73.Google Scholar
Wyatt, S., Kessels, M., and van Laerhoven, F. (2015). Indigenous peoples’ expectations for forestry in New Brunswick: Are rights enough? Society & Natural Resources, 28(6), 625–40.Google Scholar
Yengoh, G. T., Steen, K., Armah, F. A., and Ness, B. (2016). Factors of vulnerability: How large-scale land acquisitions take advantage of local and national weaknesses in Sierra Leone. Land Use Policy, 50, 328–40.Google Scholar
Young, J. C., Butler, J. R., Jordan, A., and Watt, A. D. (2012). Less government intervention in biodiversity management: Risks and opportunities. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(4), 1095–100.Google Scholar
Young, J. C., Jordan, A., Searle, K. R., Butler, A., Simmons, P., and Watt, A. D. (2013). Framing scale in participatory biodiversity management may contribute to more sustainable solutions. Conservation Letters, 6(5), 333–40.Google Scholar
Young, J. C., Searle, K., Butler, A., Simmons, P., Watt, A. D., and Jordan, A. (2016). The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts. Biological Conservation, 195, 196202.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2016). Governing the antipodes: International cooperation in Antarctica and the Arctic. Polar Record, 52(2), 230–8.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., and Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: The influence of ‘soft’ power. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(2), 159–78.Google Scholar
Zhao, X., Li, H., Wu, L., and Qi, Y. (2014). Implementation of energy-saving policies in China: How local governments assisted industrial enterprises in achieving energy-saving targets. Energy Policy, 66, 170–84.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×