Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:41:19.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Potentialities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2010

Simha Arom
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Get access

Summary

The method described can be used to decompose polyphony into a coherent set of elementary monodies. It is therefore the first method to be devised which is capable of providing students of musicology, acoustics, and organology with a recording of the individual parts in any piece. It thereby makes it possible to conduct laboratory studies which were previously restricted to monodic music: pitch analysis, decomposition of the frequency spectrum by real-time analysis, sonographic studies of harmonics and overtones, and melographic recordings of melodic curves. It also constitutes a new tool for ethnomusicological research into the musical psychology of peoples with orally transmitted polyphonic traditions, particularly, into how far the musicians consciously develop their polyphony and what individual limits are placed on their musical ‘productivity’. A few of these possibilities will now be illustrated by specific examples.

We wanted to find out to what extent each of the singers in a group of Pygmies was conscious of the polyphonic structure of a specific piece, i.e., of its metric, rhythmic, modal, and vertical, i.e., ‘harmonic’, organisation. After recording the first singer in the traditional order of entry, we asked each of the remaining performers to develop a counterpoint to the melody of this initial ‘cantus firmus’. This was done by about ten people. We found that, despite (or perhaps because of) the experimental conditions, all were perfectly clear about how the metre, rhythm, mode, and vertical organisation of their parts should be directly related to the ‘cantus firmus’.

Conversely, it is impossible, by merely listening, to determine how Pygmy vocal polyphony is organised, despite the obviously coherent relationships among the undeterminable number of voices.

Type
Chapter
Information
African Polyphony and Polyrhythm
Musical Structure and Methodology
, pp. 115 - 117
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×