Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:43:14.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - The Adoption of Multiattribute Utility Theory for the Evaluation of Plutonium Disposition Options in the United States and Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John C. Butler
Affiliation:
A. B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University
Alexander N. Chebeskov
Affiliation:
State Scientific Center of Russian Federation, Institute for Physics and Power Engineering
James S. Dyer
Affiliation:
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas-Austin
Thomas A. Edmunds
Affiliation:
Systems and Decision Sciences Section, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Jianmin Jia
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business Administration, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Vladimir I. Oussanov
Affiliation:
State Scientific Center of Russian Federation, Institute for Physics and Power Engineering
Ralph F. Miles Jr.
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Detlof von Winterfeldt
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT. At the end of the Cold War, the United States and Russia entered into agreements that reduced the numbers of nuclear weapons in their arsenals. The possibility that excess plutonium recovered from dismantled weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists has been characterized as a “clear and present danger” by the National Academy of Sciences. Other disposition considerations include plutonium's potential for use as an energy source and its environmental impacts. A team of U.S. decision analysts was commissioned by the Department of Energy's Office of Fissile Materials Disposition to develop a multiattribute utility model to help evaluate alternatives for the disposition of the excess-weapons plutonium. Subsequent to the U.S. study, Russian scientists modified the model with the aid of the U.S. team, and used it to evaluate Russian disposition alternatives.

At the end of the Cold War, the United States and Russia entered into arms limitations and reduction agreements that reduced the numbers of nuclear weapons that would be in the arsenals of each nation. When these nuclear weapons are dismantled, plutonium pits – the triggers for modern nuclear weapons – are stored in anticipation of their ultimate disposal. Estimates of the numbers of weapons to be dismantled vary, but may be on the order of 15,000 in the United States and perhaps twice that many in Russia [NAS 95].

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Decision Analysis
From Foundations to Applications
, pp. 489 - 513
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, J. C., Morrice, D., and Mullarkey, P. (2001). A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Science, 47, 800–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chebeskov, A. N., Korobeinikov, V. V., Oussanov, V. I., Zavadsky, M. I., Tikhomirov, B. B., and Iougai, S. V (2001). Methodology of the multi-attribute system analysis of the selected scenarios for plutonium utilization. Brussels May 14–16, 2001.Google Scholar
Chebeskov, A. N., Oussanov, V. I., Tikhomirov, B. B., Nevinitsa, V. A., and Pshakin, G. M. (1998). Preliminary results of systems analysis on plutonium utilization options in Russia. Paper presented at the workshop on the ISTC Project No 369, Brussels, Belgium, April 6–7, 1998.Google Scholar
Chebeskov, A. N., Zavadski, M. I., and Ousssanov, V. I. (1999). Multi-attribute analysis of Plutonium use in nuclear reactors. Paper presented at the Third Meeting of the Contract Expert Group, Dimitrovgrad, Russia, June 7–9, 1999.Google Scholar
[DOE-PEIS 96]. U.S. Department of Energy. (1996). Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, DOE/EIS-0229. Office of Fissile Materials Disposition.
[DOE-ROD 97]. U.S. Department of Energy. (1997). Record of Decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. United States Department of Energy; Office of Fissile Materials Disposition.
[DOE-TSR 96]. U.S. Department of Energy. (1996). Technical Summary Report for Surplus Weapons-Usable Plutonium Disposition, DOE/MD-0003 Rev. 1. Office of Fissile Materials Disposition.
Dyer, J. S., Edmunds, T. A., Butler, J. C., and Jia, J. (1996). A proposed methodology for the analysis and selection of alternatives for the disposition of surplus plutonium. Paper presented at the International Meeting on Military Conversion and Science “Utilization of the Excess-Weapon Plutonium: Scientific, Technological and Socio-Economic Aspects.” Villa Olmo, Como, Italy, March 20, 1996.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. S., Edmunds, T. A., Butler, J. C., and Jia, J. (1997). Evaluation of alternatives for the disposition of Surplus weapons-usable plutonium. Technical Paper 1997–1. Amarillo National Research Center.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. S., Edmunds, T. A., Butler, J. C., and Jia, J. (1998). A multiattribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. Operations Research, 46, 749–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, J. S., Edmunds, , Chebeskov, T. A., Oussanov, A. N., Butler, V. I., Jia, J. C., , J. (2005). The Adoption of Multi-attribute Utility Theory for the Evaluation of Plutonium Disposition Options in the United States and Russia, Interfaces vol. 35, no. 1.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1998). Even swaps: A rational method for making trade-offs. Harvard Business Review, 76, 137–149.Google ScholarPubMed
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
[MIN-RF-AE 00]. Ministry of Russian Federation for Atomic Energy. (2000). Strategy of nuclear power development of Russia in the first part of XⅪ century: The main principles. Moscow: Ministry of the Russian Federation for Atomic Energy.
[NAS 94]. National Academy of Sciences. (1994). Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[NAS 95]. National Academy of Sciences. (1995). Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium – Reactor Related Options. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×