Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T09:22:20.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Not just what, but when (and how): comparative-historical approaches to authoritarian durability

from Part II - Agenda-setting work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

By
Steven Levitsky  and
Lucan A. Way
Edited by
James Mahoney  and
Kathleen Thelen
Steven Levitsky
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Lucan A. Way
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
James Mahoney
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Kathleen Thelen
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

After a nearly two-decade span in which regime studies focused almost exclusively on democratization, scholarly attention turned back to authoritarianism in the early 2000s. Faced with the persistence of authoritarian rule in the Middle East, China, and elsewhere, as well as its (re)emergence in Russia and other former Soviet states, scholars began to investigate the sources of durable authoritarianism.

Recent research has drawn attention to a range of factors that contribute to authoritarian stability, including natural resource rents, economic performance, and political institutions such as parties, elections, and legislatures. Most of these analyses are based on “constant cause” explanations, in which key causal factors (1) must be present for the predicted outcome to be observed and (2) are treated as having universal, rather than context-dependent, effects. This work has generated important insights. However, an emerging body of research suggests that the effects of standard economic and institutional variables are mediated by historical and contextual factors, such as when (relative to the onset of other variables) and how authoritarian regimes emerge or consolidate. This growing scholarly attention to timing and context – seen in the recent “historical turn” in regime studies (Capoccia and Ziblatt 2010) – highlights the continued vitality of comparative-historical analysis. Indeed, as we show below, recent comparative-historical research offers powerful tools for understanding the roots of authoritarian durability.

This chapter examines the contributions of comparative-historical analysis to recent research on authoritarianism, highlighting what is gained by paying close attention to regime origins, timing, and sequencing. These factors, we argue, help explain why regimes with similar institutional arrangements vary so widely in their durability and why autocracies respond in diverging ways to similar economic or natural resource “shocks.” The chapter then turns to a major challenge facing comparative-historical scholarship: the question of how, and for how long, founding legacies are reproduced. We argue that founding legacies are rarely static, or self-perpetuating, as is sometimes assumed. Rather, many of them are bounded, in that their effects weaken and disappear over time, even in the absence of exogenous change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis , pp. 97 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellin, Eva. 2004. “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics 36 (2): 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bienen, Henry. 1970. “One-Party Systems in Africa.” In Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems, edited by Huntington, Samuel and Moore, Clement, 99–127. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2010. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2002. “…And Yet They Persist: Explaining Survival and Transition in Neopatrimonial Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (3): 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, Jason 2007. Durable Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2010. “The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (8/9): 931–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2008. Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia. 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G., and Lynch, Julia F.. 2009. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (9): 1143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. “Elections under Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (11): 1279–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark. 1995. “Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 89:882–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2:115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara 2005. Why Parties and Elections in Authoritarian Regimes? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara 2008. “Party Creation as an Autocratic Survival Strategy.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
Greene, Kenneth. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2011. “Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (9): 1267–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted R. 1988. “War, Revolution, and the Growth of the Coercive State.” Comparative Political Studies 21 (1): 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, Stephen, and Menaldo, Victor. 2011. “Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herb, Michael. 1999. All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution, and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Herb, Michael 2005. “No Representation without Taxation? Rents, Development, and Democracy.” Comparative Politics 37 (3): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1970. “Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-Party Systems.” In Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems, edited by Huntington, Samuel and Moore, Clement, 3–47. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Janos, Andrew C. 1970. “The One-Party State and Social Mobilization: East Europe between the Wars.” In Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Systems, edited by Huntington, Samuel and Moore, Clement, 204–38. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jensen, Nathan, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2004. “Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 37 (7): 816–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowitt, Ken. 1992. New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Alan. 2003. “The Domestic Dynamics of the Mexican and Bolivian Revolutions.” In Proclaiming Revolution: Bolivia in Comparative Perspective, edited by Grindle, Merilee and Domingo, Pilar, 54–90. London: Institute of Latin American Studies and David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
LeBas, Adrienne. 2011. From Protest to Parties: Party-Building and Democratization in Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2009. “Variation in Institutional Strength.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A. 2012. “Beyond Patronage: Violent Struggle, Ruling Party Cohesion, and Authoritarian Durability.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (4): 869–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A. 2013. “The Durability of Revolutionary Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 24 (3): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luong, Pauline Jones, and Weinthal, Erika. 2006. Rethinking the Resource Curse: Ownership Structure, Institutional Capacity, and Domestic Constraints. Annual Review of Political Science 9:241–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, Pauline Jones, and Weinthal, Erika 2010. Oil Is Not a Curse: Ownership Structure and Institutions in the Soviet Successor States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2007. Structuring Conflict in the Arab World: Incumbents, Opponents, and Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz 2008. “Credible Power Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 715–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Kricheli, Ruth. 2010. “Political Order and One Party Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 13:123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2001a. The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James 2001b. “Path Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 111–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, Kevin. 2009. “Oil, Non-Tax Revenue, and the Redistributional Foundations of Regime Stability.” International Organization 63:107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1978. “Reflections on Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic Authoritarian State.” Latin American Research Review 12 (1): 3–38.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1979. “Tensions in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State and the Question of Democracy.” In The New Authoritarianism in Latin America, edited by Collier, David, 285–318. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1988. Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Argentina 1966–1973 in Comparative Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2009. Economic Crisis and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes: Indonesia and Malaysia in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. “Modernization: Theories and Facts.” World Politics 49 (2): 155–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, Ora John, and Gandhi, Jennifer. 2011. “Economic Performance and Elite Defection from Hegemonic Parties.” British Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James, and Torvik, Ragnar. 2011. Institutional Comparative Statics. NBER Working Paper No. 17106. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael L. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53 (3): 325–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D.. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas ed. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidman, Gay. 1994. Manufacturing Militance: Workers’ Movements in Brazil and South Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Simpser, Alberto. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda 1988. “Social Revolutions and Mass Military Mobilization.” World Politics 40 (2): 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2003. “Iron Cage in an Iron Fist: Authoritarian Institutions and the Personalization of Power in Malaysia.” Comparative Politics 36 (1): 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics, State-Building, and Authoritarian Durability in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Benjamin. 2005. “Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule.” World Politics 57 (3): 421–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Benjamin 2007. Hard Times in the Lands of Plenty: Oil Politics in Iran and Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stacher, Joshua. 2012. Adaptable Autocrats: Regime Power in Egypt and Syria. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenberg, Dag, Stefes, Cristoph, and Merkel, Wolfgang. 2013. “Hard Times and Regime Failure: Autocratic Responses to Economic Downturns.” Contemporary Politics 19 (1): 115–29.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 208–40. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ulfelder, Jay. 2007. Natural-Resource Wealth and the Survival of Autocracy. Comparative Political Studies 40 (8): 995–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldner, David. n.d. “Democracy and Dictatorship in the Post-Colonial World.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Walt, Stephen. 1996. Revolution and War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Way, Lucan. 2005. “Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave.” World Politics 57 (2): 231–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, Lucan 2015. Pluralism by Default: Weak Autocrats and the Rise of Competitive Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wiens, David, Poast, Paul, and Clark, William Roberts. 2012. “Is There a Political Resource Curse? A Theoretical and Empirical Re-Evaluation.” Unpublished manuscript.
Wintrobe, Ronald. 2000. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah. 1997. Demanding Democracy: Reform and Reaction in Costa Rica and Guatemala, 1870's–1950's. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2006. “How Did Europe Democratize?” World Politics 58 (22): 311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×