Weight and Balance Performance

Antonio Filippone

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139161893.006

3 - Weight and Balance Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2013

Antonio Filippone

Show author details

Antonio Filippone: Affiliation:
University of Manchester

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Overview

The aircraft weight influences the performance of the airplane more than any other parameter. Weight has been of concern from the earliest days of aeronautics (§ 3.1). Therefore, we devote this chapter to the weight analysis and the relative aspects, such as operational and design weights (§ 3.2); weight management issues (§ 3.3); operational limits (§ 3.4); centre of gravity envelopes (§ 3.5); loading and certification issues, operational moments and corresponding errors (§ 3.6); the use of the wing tanks (§ 3.7); and, finally, mass properties, including determination of the CG and the moments of inertias of the empty airplane (§ 3.8).

KEY CONCEPTS: Aircraft Size, Design Weights, Operational Weights, Mass Distribution, Centre of Gravity Envelopes, Moments of Inertia, Fuel Tanks.

A Question of Size

By the start of the First World War, in the United Kingdom it was believed that the limiting weight of the airplane could not exceed 2,000 lb (∼800 kg). Aircraft engineers of that time ignored that in 1913–1914 the great Igor Sikorsky designed, built and flew a four-engine aircraft known as Ily'a Murometz, or S-27, whose loaded weight was 5,400 kg. The total installed power was about 400 hp (∼300 kW). The aircraft could carry as many as 16 passengers in its uncomfortable quarters.

Prior to this project, it was widely believed that a multi-engine aircraft would not be capable of flying. The main concern centred around the question of how to control the aircraft in the event of one engine failure – a likely occurrence in those days.

Type: Chapter
Information: Advanced Aircraft Flight Performance , pp. 45 - 77

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139161893.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Finne, KN. Igor Sikorsky: The Russian Years. Prentice Hall, 1988. ISBN 0874742749.Google Scholar

[2] Grant, RG. Flight: 100 Years of Aviation. Dorling Kindersley Ltd, 2002.Google Scholar

[3] Baumann, A. Progress made in the construction of giant airplanes in Germany during the war. Technical Report TN 29, NACA, 1920.Google Scholar

[4] Cleveland, FA. Size effects in conventional aircraft design. J. Aircraft, 7(6):483–512, Nov. 1970.CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Lange, RH. Design concepts for future cargo aircraft. J. Aircraft, 13(6):385–392, June 1976.CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Whitener, PC. Distributed load aircraft concepts. J. Aircraft, 16(2):72–75, Feb. 1979.CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] McMasters, JH and Kroo, I. Advanced configurations for very large transport airplanes. Aircraft Design, 1(4):217–242, 1998.CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Staton, RN, editor. Introduction to Aircraft Weight Engineering. SAWE Inc., Los Angeles, 2003.

[9] Anon. Aerodrome design m anual. Part 3. Pavements (Doc 9157P3), 2nd Edition, 1983 (reprinted 2003).

[10] Roskam, J. Airplane Design Part V: Component Weight Estimation. Roskam Aviation & Engineering, 1985.Google Scholar

[11] Torenbeek, E. Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design. Kluwer Academic Publ., 1985.Google Scholar

[12] Raymer, D. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach. AIAA Educational Series, 3rd edition, 1999.Google Scholar

[13] Udin, SV and Anderson, WJ. Wing mass formula for subsonic aircraft. J. Aircraft, 29(4):725–732, July 1992.Google Scholar

[14] Beltramo, MN, Trapp, DL, Kimoto, BW, and Marsh, DP. Parametric study of transport aircraft systems cost and weight. Technical Report CR 151970, NASA, April 1977.

[15] Galjaard, ER. Real time related dry operating weight system. In 54th SAWE Annual Conference, Paper 2278, Huntsville, AL, May 1995.Google Scholar

[16] Ardema, MD, Chambers, MC, and Patron, AP. Analytical fuselage and wing weight estimation of transport aircraft. Technical Report TM-110392, NASA, May 1996.