Book contents
- Adjudicating Trade and Investment Disputes
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- Adjudicating Trade and Investment Disputes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Editors and Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Assessing Convergence in International Economic Disputes – A Framework
- Part I Dispute System Design
- Part II Use of Precedent across Regimes
- Part III Interpretive Powers and Adjudicative Behaviour
- 7 Inherent Powers of the WTO Appellate Body and ICSID Tribunals – A Tale of Cautious Convergence
- 8 The Use of Object and Purpose by Trade and Investment Adjudicators: Convergence without Interaction
- 9 Assessing Convergence between International Investment Law and International Trade Law through Interpretative Commissions/Committees: A Case of Ambivalence?
- 10 Regime Responsiveness in International Economic Disputes
- 11 Epilogue: ‘Convergence’ Is a Many-Splendored Thing
- Index
10 - Regime Responsiveness in International Economic Disputes
from Part III - Interpretive Powers and Adjudicative Behaviour
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2020
Book contents
- Adjudicating Trade and Investment Disputes
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- Adjudicating Trade and Investment Disputes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Editors and Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Assessing Convergence in International Economic Disputes – A Framework
- Part I Dispute System Design
- Part II Use of Precedent across Regimes
- Part III Interpretive Powers and Adjudicative Behaviour
- 7 Inherent Powers of the WTO Appellate Body and ICSID Tribunals – A Tale of Cautious Convergence
- 8 The Use of Object and Purpose by Trade and Investment Adjudicators: Convergence without Interaction
- 9 Assessing Convergence between International Investment Law and International Trade Law through Interpretative Commissions/Committees: A Case of Ambivalence?
- 10 Regime Responsiveness in International Economic Disputes
- 11 Epilogue: ‘Convergence’ Is a Many-Splendored Thing
- Index
Summary
State backlash has marked dispute settlement mechanisms in both the international trade and investment treaty regimes. For the former, the transition from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) dispute panels to the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM) represented a notable instance of the turn toward international courts within world politics.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adjudicating Trade and Investment DisputesConvergence or Divergence?, pp. 244 - 284Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
- 1
- Cited by