Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:44:28.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Synergies and Trade-Offs between Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation across Multiple Scales of Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2021

By
Asim Zia
Edited by
Riyanti Djalante  and
Bernd Siebenhüner
Riyanti Djalante
Affiliation:
United Nations University, Tokyo
Bernd Siebenhüner
Affiliation:
Carl V. Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

To catalyse action for both mitigation and adaptation to anthropogenic climate change, improved understanding of synergies and trade-offs induced by differential governance interventions in earth system dynamics is needed at multiple scales – local to national and global. This chapter applies a social-ecological systems (SES) analytical approach and a novel interdisciplinary integrative framework for trade-off analysis embedded within an SES approach to analyse cross-scale impacts of three specific UNFCCC-mediated policy mechanisms aimed at mitigation and/or adaptation to climate change:Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), the Clean Development Mechanism, and the Adaptation Fund. Evidence from published studies is presented to identify synergies and trade-offs among mitigation and adaptation impacts of these policy mechanisms. It is argued that the SES approach may provide a scalable, replicable, and integrative analytical approach to rigorously analyse the synergies and trade-offs of different global to local policy mechanisms and their feedback effects from local to global scales.

Keywords

adaptation to climate changeclimate change mitigationsocial-ecological systemsintegrative frameworkclimate policy mechanisms
Type
Chapter
Information
Adaptiveness: Changing Earth System Governance , pp. 102 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K.W. & Gartner, D. (2011). The Green Climate Fund and the Future of Environmental Governance. Earth System Governance Working Paper No. 16. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1931066.Google Scholar
Achard, F., Eva, H.D., Mayaux, P., Stibig, H.J., & Belward, A. (2004). Improved estimates of net carbon emissions from land cover change in the tropics for the 1990s. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
Al Awadhi, S., Abbas, Z., & Mezher, T. (2017). Analyzing sustainable development impacts of large-scale clean development mechanism projects in host countries. International Journal of Thermal and Environmental Engineering, 14(2), 153–61.Google Scholar
Baird, I.G. & Green, W.N. (2020). The Clean Development Mechanism and large dam development: contradictions associated with climate financing in Cambodia. Climatic Change, 161(2), 365–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, S., Haug, C., van Asselt, H., Gupta, J., & Saïdi, R. (2011). The future of the CDM: same same, but differentiated? Climate Policy, 11(1), 752–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berga, L. (2016). The role of hydropower in climate change mitigation and adaptation: a review. Engineering, 2(3), 313–18.Google Scholar
Benites-Lazaro, L.L. & Mello-Théry, N.A. (2019). Empowering communities? Local stakeholders’ participation in the Clean Development Mechanism in Latin America. World Development, 114, 254–66.Google Scholar
Beymer-Farris, B.A. & Bassett, T.J. (2012). The REDD menace: resurgent protectionism in Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 332–41.Google Scholar
Biesbroek, G.R., Swart, R.J., & van der Knaap, W.G. (2009). The mitigation–adaptation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat International, 33(3), 230–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, D.H. (2008). Out of the Woods: A Realistic Role for Tropical Forests in Curbing Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.Google Scholar
Brunner, R.D. & Lynch, A.H. (2010). Adaptive Governance and Climate Change, Boston: American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
Brunner, R.D., Steelman, T.A., Coe-Juell, L., Cromley, C., & Edwards, C. (2005). Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cames, M., Harthan, R.O., Füssler, J. et al. (2016). How Additional Is the Clean Development Mechanism? Analysis of Application of Current Tools and Proposed Alternatives. Berlin: Oeko-Institut EV CLlMA. B, 3. Retrieved from www.verifavia.com/uploads/files/clean_dev_mechanism_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Chhatre, A. & Agrawal, A. (2009). Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences, 106(42), 17667–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, G. (2010). The Clean Development Mechanism as a vehicle for technology transfer and sustainable development: myth of reality. Law Environment and Development Journal, 6, 179.Google Scholar
DeFries, R.S., Houghton, R.A., Hansen, M.C. et al. (2002). Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(22), 14256–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D.R., Paavola, J. et al. (2017). Climate policy integration in the land use sector: mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 67, 35–43.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P.C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinar, A., Rahman, S.M. , Larson, D.F., & Ambrosi, P. (2011). Local actions, global impacts: international cooperation and the CDM. Global Environmental Politics, 11(4), 108–33.Google Scholar
Dirix, J., Peeters, W., & Sterckx, S. (2016). Is the Clean Development Mechanism delivering benefits to the poorest communities in the developing world? A critical evaluation and proposals for reform. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(3), 839–55.Google Scholar
Duan, M. (2011). Reform of the Clean Development Mechanism: where should we head for? Carbon & Climate Law Review, 5(2), 169–77.Google Scholar
Flåm, K.H. & Skjærseth, J.B. (2009). Does adequate financing exist for adaptation in developing countries? Climate Policy, 9(1), 109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 411–73.Google Scholar
Grasso, M. (2011). The role of justice in the North–South conflict in climate change: the case of negotiations on the Adaptation Fund. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(4), 361–77.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L.H. & Holling, C.S. (eds.) (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, A., Pistorius, T., & Vijge, M.J. (2016). Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance: the REDD+ partnership as bridge organization. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 355–74.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P.D., Adams, W.M., Brosius, J.P. et al. (2011). Acknowledging conservation trade‐offs and embracing complexity. Conservation Biology, 25(2), 259–64.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P.D., Brosius, J.P., O’Connor, S. et al. (2013). Navigating complex trade-offs in conservation and development: an integrative framework. Issues in Integrative Studies, 31, 99–122.Google Scholar
Horstmann, B. (2011). Operationalizing the Adaptation Fund: challenges in allocating funds to the vulnerable. Climate Policy, 11(4), 1086–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R.A. (2003). Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus B, 55(2), 378–90.Google Scholar
Ingalls, M.L. & Dwyer, M.B. (2016). Missing the forest for the trees? Navigating the trade-offs between mitigation and adaptation under REDD. Climatic Change, 136(2), 353–66.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018). Summary for policymakers. In Masson-Delmotte, V. , Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.O. et al., eds., Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Jarvis, A., Lau, C., Cook, S. et al. (2011). An integrated adaptation and mitigation framework for developing agricultural research: synergies and trade-offs. Experimental Agriculture, 47(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
Köhl, M., Neupane, P.R., & Mundhenk, P. (2020). REDD+ measurement, reporting and verification: a cost trap? Implications for financing REDD+ MRV costs by result-based payments. Ecological Economics, 168, 106513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A.M., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D. et al. (2013). Land tenure and REDD+: the good, the bad and the ugly. Global Environmental Change, 23(3), 678–89.Google Scholar
Landauer, M., Juhola, S., & Söderholm, M. (2015). Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation: a systematic literature review. Climatic Change, 131(4), 505–17.Google Scholar
Lederer, M. (2011). From CDM to REDD+: what do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance? Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1900–7.Google Scholar
Lima, M.G.B., Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., Braña-Varela, J., & Gupta, A. (2017). A reality check on the landscape approach to REDD+: lessons from Latin America. Forest Policy and Economics, 78, 10–20.Google Scholar
Locatelli, B., Pavageau, C., Pramova, E., & Di Gregorio, M. (2015). Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: opportunities and trade‐offs. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(6), 585–98.Google Scholar
McElwee, P., Nguyen, V.H., Dung, N.V. et al. (2017). Using REDD+ policy to facilitate climate adaptation at the local level: synergies and challenges in Vietnam. Forests, 8(1), 11.Google Scholar
McShane, T.O., Hirsch, P.D., Trung, T.C. et al. (2011). Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation, 144(3), 966–72.Google Scholar
Manuamorn, O.P., Biesbroek, R., & Cebotari, V. (2020). What makes internationally financed climate change adaptation projects focus on local communities? A configurational analysis of 30 Adaptation Fund projects. Global Environmental Change, 61, 102035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102035.Google Scholar
Martens, P., McEvoy, D., & Chang, C. (2009). The climate change challenge: linking vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 14–18.Google Scholar
Mata, L.J. & Budhooram, J. (2007). Complementarity between mitigation and adaptation: the water sector. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(5), 799–807.Google Scholar
Milne, S., Mahanty, S., To, P. et al. (2019). Learning from ‘actually existing’ REDD+: a synthesis of ethnographic findings. Conservation & Society, 17(1), 84–95.Google Scholar
Nabuurs, G.J., Masera, O., Andrasko, P. et al. (2007). IPCC fourth assessment report, working group III, chapter 9 (final draft). In Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., & Meyer, L.A., eds., Climate Change 2007: Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, University Press, 541–84.Google Scholar
Norton, B.G. (2005). Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ochieng, R.M., Arts, B., Brockhaus, M., & Visseren-Hamakers, I.J. (2018). Institutionalization of REDD+ MRV in Indonesia, Peru, and Tanzania. Ecology and Society, 23(2), 8.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L.H., Carpenter, S.R. et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of socio-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15181–7.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–22.Google Scholar
Parker, C., Mitchell, A., Trivedi, M., Mardas, N., & Sosis, K. (2009). The Little REDD+ book. Oxford: Global Canopy Programme.Google Scholar
Pistorius, T. (2012). From RED to REDD+: the evolution of a forest-based mitigation approach for developing countries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 638–45.Google Scholar
Ramankutty, N., Gibbs, H.K., Achard, F. et al. (2007). Challenges to estimating carbon emissions from tropical deforestation. Global Change Biology, 13(1), 51–66.Google Scholar
Repetto, R. (2001). The Clean Development Mechanism: institutional breakthrough or institutional nightmare? Policy Sciences, 2001(34), 303–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012603007614.Google Scholar
Schiermeier, Q. (2011). Clean-energy credits tarnished. Nature, 477(7366), 517–18.Google Scholar
Schneider, L. (2009). A Clean Development Mechanism with global atmospheric benefits for a post-2012 climate regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(2), 95–111.Google Scholar
Scholz, J.T. & Stiftel, B. (eds.). (2010). Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schulz, A., Zia, A., & Koliba, C. (2017). Adapting bridge infrastructure to climate change: institutionalizing resilience in intergovernmental transportation planning processes in the Northeastern USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(1), 175–98.Google Scholar
Shankland, A. & Hasenclever, L. (2011). Indigenous peoples and the regulation of REDD+ in Brazil: beyond the war of the worlds? IDS Bulletin, 42(3), 80–8.Google Scholar
Shaw, A., Burch, S., Kristensen, F., Robinson, J., & Dale, A. (2014). Accelerating the sustainability transition: exploring synergies between adaptation and mitigation in British Columbian communities. Global Environmental Change, 25, 41–51.Google Scholar
Stahlke, T. (2019). The impact of the Clean Development Mechanism on developing countries’ commitment to mitigate climate change and its implications for the future. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09863-8.Google Scholar
Stockholm Resilience Alliance (SRA). (2020) Adaptive Governance. Retrieved from www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-streames/stewardship/adaptive-governance-.html.Google Scholar
Sunderlin, W.D., Larson, A.M., & Cronkleton, P. (2009). Forest tenure rights and REDD. In Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M. et al., eds., Realising REDD. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research, 139–50.Google Scholar
Sunderlin, W.D., Sillis, E., Duchelle, A.E. et al. (2015). REDD+ at a critical juncture: assessing the limits of polycentric governance for achieving climate change mitigation. International Forestry Review, 17(4), 400–13.Google Scholar
Sutter, C. & Parreño, J.C. (2007). Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects. Climatic Change, 84(1), 75–90.Google Scholar
Thornton, T. F. & Comberti, C. (2017). Synergies and trade-offs between adaptation, mitigation and development. Climatic Change, 140(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnhout, E., Gupta, A., Weatherley-Singh, J. et al. (2017). Envisioning REDD+ in a post-Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(1), e425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.425.Google Scholar
UN-REDD Programme (2009). Multiple Benefits: Issues and Options for REDD. Geneva: UN-REDD Programme.Google Scholar
Viguié, V. & Hallegatte, S. (2012). Trade-offs and synergies in urban climate policies. Nature Climate Change, 2(5), 334–7.Google Scholar
Weatherley-Singh, J. & Gupta, A. (2015). Drivers of deforestation and REDD+ benefit-sharing: a meta-analysis of the (missing) link. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 97–105.Google Scholar
Wollenberg, E., Tapio-Bistrom, M.L., Grieg-Gran, M., & Nihart, A. (eds.). (2013). Climate Change Mitigation and Agriculture. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zadek, S. (2011). Beyond climate finance: from accountability to productivity in addressing the climate challenge. Climate Policy, 11(3), 1058–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zia, A. (2013). Post-Kyoto Climate Governance: Confronting the Politics of Scale, Ideology and Knowledge. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zia, A., Hirsch, P., Songorwa, A. et al. (2011). Cross-scale value trade-offs in managing social-ecological systems: the politics of scale in Ruaha National Park, Tanzania. Ecology and Society, 16(4), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zia, A. & Kauffman, S. (2018) The limits of predictability in predefining phase spaces of dynamic social ecological systems: command and control’ versus ‘complex systems’ based policy design approaches to conserve tropical forests. Journal of Policy and Complex Systems, 4(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.18278/jpcs.4.2.9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×