Decentralization: a window of opportunity for successful adaptation to climate change?

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511596667.026

25 - Decentralization: a window of opportunity for successful adaptation to climate change?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2009

Maria Brockhaus and

Edited by

Irene Lorenzoni and

W. Neil Adger: Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Irene Lorenzoni: Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Karen L. O'Brien: Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

In times of fundamental changes and shifts in institutional, political and economic structures at various scales, climate change and variability also exert a strong pressure on the resilience of social–ecological systems (IPCC, 2007). The IPCC states that African countries will be affected most by future climate change, since among other factors, widespread poverty, demographic changes, constrained institutional realities and inadequate political strategies are significantly limiting local adaptation capabilities (DFID, 2006; World Bank, 2006). In West Africa, livelihoods are highly dependent on forest ecosystem goods and services (FEGS), often in interplay with agricultural and livestock production systems. To reduce the growing risk of vulnerability under climate change, technical and societal adaptation is needed. Revised governance structures may enable adaptation at multiple levels and layers.

This chapter examines the opportunities and barriers for successful adaptation to climate change and variability in the context of an ongoing decentralization process, by examining the relatively understudied relationship between adaptive capacity and features of governance and culture. Here we present a case study on forests, climate change and aspects of adaptive capacity under a changing institutional landscape in two municipalities in the south-west of Burkina Faso. Adaptive capacity, in this chapter, is also understood as a function of governance features – such as institutional governance structures – and the individual understandings of the actors involved in decision-making processes related to FEGS. The chapter concludes by highlighting the importance of knowledge to overcome resource dependency and of two key features of governance essential for technical and societal adaptation to climate change: (1) individual understandings and (2) institutional flexibility dependent upon close links with local realities.

Type: Chapter
Information: Adapting to Climate Change
Thresholds, Values, Governance
, pp. 399 - 416

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596667.026 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agrawal, A. and Ribot, J. 1999. ‘Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and West African cases’, Journal of Developing Areas 33: 473–502.Google Scholar

Brockhaus, M. 2005. Potentials and Obstacles in the Arena of Conflict and Natural Resource Management: A Case Study on Conflicts, Institutions and Policy Networks in Burkina Faso. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.Google Scholar

Brooks, N., Adger, W. N. and Kelly, P. M. 2005. ‘The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation’, Global Environmental Change 15: 151–163.CrossRef Google Scholar

Route, Burkina Faso Info 2008. Burkina Faso Info Route. Available at www.inforoute-communale.gov.bf/monographies_cadre1.htm (accessed 20 July 2008)

Colfer, C. and Capistrano, D. (eds.) 2005. The Politics of Decentralization: Forests, People and Power. London: Earthscan.

,DFID 2006. Eliminating World Poverty: Making Governance Work for the Poor. London: DFIDGoogle Scholar

Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., Walker, B., Bengtsson, J., Berkes, F., Colding, J., Danell, K., Falkenmark, M., Gordon, L., Kaspersson, R., Kautsky, N., Kinzig, A., Levin, S. A., Mäler, K.-G., Moberg, F., Ohlsson, L., Olsson, P., Ostrom, E., Reid, W., Rockström, J., Savenije, S. and Svedin, U. 2002. Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations, Report for the Swedish Environmental Advisory Council. Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment.Google Scholar

Forner, C., Nkem, J., Santoso, H., and Perez, C. 2006. Setting Priorities for Forests in Adaptation to Climate Change, TroFCCA's first year report. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar

Herrmann, S. and Hutchinson, C. 2005. ‘The changing contexts of the desertification debate’, Journal of Arid Environments 63: 538–555.CrossRef Google Scholar

Huq, S. and Burton, I. 2003. Funding Adaptation to Climate Change: What, Who and How to Fund? Sustainable Development Opinion, RING Alliance No. 4. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar

,ICSU 2005. Harnessing Science, Technology, and Innovation for Sustainable Development, A Report from the International Council for Science (ICSU)-ISTS-TWAS Consortium Ad Hoc Advisory Group. Paris: ICSU.Google Scholar

,IPCC 2001. Climate Change 2001:Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

,IPCC 2007. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Linden, V. J. and Hanson, C. E. (eds.) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mukheibir, P. and Ziervogel, G. 2007. ‘Developing a Municipal Adaptation Plan (MAP) for climate change: the city of Cape Town’, Environment and Urbanization 19: 143–158.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ribot, J. C., Agrawal, A. and Larson, A. M. 2006. ‘Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources’, World Development 34: 1864–1886.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tacconi, L. 2007. ‘Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: theory and narrative’, Global Environmental Change 17: 338–348.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tompkins, E. and Adger, W. N. 2004. ‘Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change?’, Ecology and Society 9: 10.CrossRef Google Scholar

,UNDP 1997. Governance for Sustainable Human Development, a UNDP policy document. Available at http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/policy/ (accessed 10 July 2008)

Vincent, K. 2007. ‘Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale’, Global Environmental Change 17: 12–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

,World Bank Group Global Environment Facility Program 2006. Managing Climate Risk: Integrating Adaptation into World Bank Group Operations. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar