Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword by Judge Thomas Buergenthal
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Periodical Abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Table of U.S. Statutes
- Table of Treaties
- I General International and U.S. Foreign Relations Law
- II State Diplomatic and Consular Relations
- III State Jurisdiction and Immunities
- IV State Responsibility and Liability
- V International Organizations
- VI International Law and Nonstate Actors
- VII International Oceans, Environment, Health, and Aviation Law
- VIII International Economic Law
- IX International Human Rights
- X International Criminal Law
- XI Use of Force and Arms Control
- XII Settlement of Disputes
- XIII Private International Law
- Annex
- Index
IV - State Responsibility and Liability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword by Judge Thomas Buergenthal
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Periodical Abbreviations
- Table of Cases
- Table of U.S. Statutes
- Table of Treaties
- I General International and U.S. Foreign Relations Law
- II State Diplomatic and Consular Relations
- III State Jurisdiction and Immunities
- IV State Responsibility and Liability
- V International Organizations
- VI International Law and Nonstate Actors
- VII International Oceans, Environment, Health, and Aviation Law
- VIII International Economic Law
- IX International Human Rights
- X International Criminal Law
- XI Use of Force and Arms Control
- XII Settlement of Disputes
- XIII Private International Law
- Annex
- Index
Summary
OVERVIEW
The principal development on the rules of state responsibility during 1999–2001 was the adoption by the International Law Commission (ILC) of a series of articles seeking to codify the law in this area. The United States was actively involved in the development of those rules, principally through submission of comments to the ILC on its work. At the same time, the United States was engaged during this period in several incidents implicating its responsibility and liability to foreign nationals, as well as that of other states to U.S. nationals. Typically characterizing its compensation as ex gratia in nature, the United States paid compensation for injuries incurred incidental to U.S. military activities, such as compensation to China for the NATO bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade and to the families of the victims of an Italian ski gondola knocked down by a U.S. military aircraft. Compensation for injuries sustained during the Second World War also featured during this period, such as compensation by the United States to persons of Japanese ancestry who were not U.S. nationals and were interned in U.S. camps during the Second World War. Conversely, the United States assisted U.S. nationals in obtaining compensation from the government of Germany for persecution during the Second World War by the Nazi regime. U.S. government efforts to assist U.S. nationals, however, remained tempered by its unwillingness to espouse claims in certain situations (such as on grounds that the claimant was not a U.S. national at the time the claim arose), although even then the U.S. government sometimes found ways to promote compensation and restitution of property by foreign governments.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- United States Practice in International Law , pp. 95 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003