Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:16:09.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2022

Michael Wood  and
Eran Sthoeger
Michael Wood
Affiliation:
Twenty Essex Chambers, London
Eran Sthoeger
Affiliation:
International Law, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The UN Security Council and International Law , pp. 201 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akande, D., ‘The Security Council and Human Rights: What Is the Role of Article 103 of the Charter?’, EJILTalk!, 30 March 2009, available at www.ejiltalk.org/the-security-council-and-human-rights-what-is-the-role-of-art-103-of-the-charter/.Google Scholar
Akehurst, M., ‘Enforcement Action by Regional Agencies, with Special Reference to the Organization of American States’, 42 BYIL (1967) 175–227.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J., International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Amvane, G., ‘Intervention Pursuant to Article 4(h) of the Constitutive Act of the African Union without United Nations Security Council Authorisation’, 15 AHRLJ (2015) 282–98.Google Scholar
Aust, A., ‘The Procedure and Practice of the Security Council Today’, in Dupuy, (1993) 365–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, W. E., The North Atlantic Treaty, the Brussels Treaty and the Charter of the United Nations (Stevens & Sons, Ltd., 1950).Google Scholar
Bellamy, A., and Dunne, T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Bellinger, J., ‘The Security Council Resolution on Syria: Is It Legally Binding?’, Lawfare, 28 September 2013, available at www.lawfareblog.com/security-council-resolution-syria-it-legally-binding.Google Scholar
Berman, F., ‘The Authorization Model: Resolution 678 and Its Effects’, in Malone, (2004) 153–61.Google Scholar
Bethlehem, D., ‘Principles Relevant to the Scope of a State’s Right of Self-Defense Against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors’, 106 AJIL (2012) 770–9.Google Scholar
Blokker, N., Saving Succeeding Generations from the Scourge of War: The United Nations Security Council at 75 (Brill/Nijhoff, 2020).Google Scholar
Boon, K., ‘The UN Security Council and Non-state Actors’, 113 Proceedings ASIL (2019) 209–12.Google Scholar
Bowett, D., ‘Collective Security and Collective Self-Defence: The Errors and Risks of Identification’, in Montaldo, M. Rama (ed.), El Derecho internacional en un mundo en transformación: liber amicorum en homenaje al profesor Eduardo Jiménez de Aréchaga (Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 1994) 425–40.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., ‘Some Problems in the Evaluation of the Practice of States as an Element of Custom’, in Arangio-Ruiz, G. (ed.), Studi di diritto internazionale in onore di Gaetano Arangio Ruiz (Editoriale Scientifica, 2004) 313–18.Google Scholar
Butchard, P., The Responsibility to Protect and the Failures of the United Nations Security Council (Hart, 2020).Google Scholar
Byers, M., ‘Book Review of T. Franck, Recourse to Force’, 97 AJIL (2003) 721–5.Google Scholar
Byers, M., ‘The Intervention in Afghanistan – 2001’, in Ruys, et al. (2018) 625–38.Google Scholar
Caron, D., ‘The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council’, 87 AJIL (1993) 552–88.Google Scholar
Chesterman, S., Johnstone, I., and Malone, D., Law and Practice of the United Nations (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, C., ‘The Legality of NATO’s Action in the Former Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) under International Law’, 49 ICLQ (2000) 910–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, W., The Second World War, Vol. I, The Gathering Storm (Cassell and Company Ltd., 1949).Google Scholar
Cockayne, J., Brubaker, R., and Jayakody, N., Fairly Clear Risks: Protecting UN Sanctions’ Legitimacy and Effectiveness through Fair and Clear Procedures (United Nations University, 2018), available at http://collections.unu.edu/view/UNU:6450#viewAttachments.Google Scholar
Conforti, B., and Focarelli, C., The Law and Practice of the United Nations (5th rev. ed., Brill/Nijhoff, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corten, O., Le droit contre la guerre (2nd ed., Pedone, 2014).Google Scholar
Corten, O., and Koutroulis, V., ‘The Jus Cogens Status of the Prohibition on the Use of Force: What Is Its Scope and Why Does It Matter?’, in Tladi, (2021) 629–67.Google Scholar
Costelloe, D., ‘Peremptory Norms and Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council’, in Tladi, (2021) 441–67.Google Scholar
Cot, J.-P., Pellet, A., and Forteau, M., La Charte des Nations Unies: Commentaire article par article (3rd ed., Economica, 2005).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., The Creation of States in International Law (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Deeks, A., ‘Threading the Needle in Security Council Resolution 2249’, Lawfare, 25 November 2015, available at www.lawfareblog.com/threading-needle-security-council-resolution-2249.Google Scholar
De La Sablière, J. M., Le Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies. Ambitions et limites (Larcier, 2015).Google Scholar
De Wet, E., The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council (Hart, 2004).Google Scholar
De Wet, E., ‘Regional Organizations and Arrangements: Authorization, Ratification, or Independent Action’, in Weller, (2015) 314–28.Google Scholar
De Wet, E., Military Assistance on Request and the Use of Force (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
De Wet, E., and Wood, M. ‘Peace, Threats to the’, MPEPIL (2022).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence (6th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugard, J., Recognition and the United Nations (Cambridge, Grotius, 1987).Google Scholar
Dupuy, R.-J., The Development of the Role of the Security Council (Hague Academy Workshop/Martinus Nijhoff, 1993).Google Scholar
Eckert, S., ‘The Role of Sanctions’, in von Einsiedel, et al. (2016) 413–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fijnaut, C., and Larik, J., Humanitarian Intervention and Political Support for Interstate Use of Force (Brill, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassbender, B., The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community (Nijhoff, 2009).Google Scholar
Fifoot, P., ‘Functions and Powers, and Interventions: UN Action in Respect of Human Rights and Humanitarian Intervention’, in Rodley, N (ed.), To Loose the Bands of Wickedness: International Intervention in Defence of Human Rights (Brasseys, 1992) 133–64.Google Scholar
Forteau, M., ‘Rescuing National Abroad’, in Weller, (2015) 947–61.Google Scholar
Fox, G., Boon, K., and Jenkins, I., ‘The Contributions of United Nations Security Council Resolutions to the Law of Non-international Armed Conflict: New Evidence of Customary International Law’, 67 Am U L Rev (2018) 649–731.Google Scholar
Franchini, D., and Tzanakopoulos, A., ‘The Kosovo Crisis – 1999’, in Ruys, et al. (2018) 594–622.Google Scholar
Franck, T., ‘Who Killed Article 2(4)? Or: Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States’, 64 AJIL (1970) 809–37.Google Scholar
Franck, T., The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (Oxford University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, T., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Franck, T., Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Franck, T., ‘Legality and Legitimacy in Humanitarian Intervention’, in Nomos 2006, Vol. 47: Humanitarian Intervention (American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, 2006) 143–57.Google Scholar
Frowein, J., and Krisch, N., ‘Introduction to Chapter VII’, in Simma (2002).Google Scholar
Gaja, G., ‘The Impact of Security Council Resolutions on State Responsibility’, in Nolte, G. (ed.), Peace through International Law: The Role of the International Law Commission (Springer Verlag, 2009) 53–60.Google Scholar
Giegerich, T., ‘Article 36’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Goodrich, M., and Hambro, E., The Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents (World Peace Foundation, 1946).Google Scholar
Goodrich, M., Hambro, E., and Simons, A., The Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents (3rd ed., Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Goodrich, L., and Simons, A., ‘Preface to the Third Edition’, in Goodrich, et al. (1969).Google Scholar
Gowlland-Debbas, V., ‘The Security Council and Issues of Responsibility under International Law’, 353 Recueil des cours (2011) 187–443.Google Scholar
Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force (4th ed., Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Green, J., ‘The Article 51 Reporting Requirements for Self-Defense Actions’, 55 Va J Int Law (2015) 563–624.Google Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of Kosovo’, 21 Finn Yearb Int Law (1999) 141–75.Google Scholar
Hajjami, N., ‘Que signifie l’expression ‘prendre toutes les mesures nécessaires’ dans la pratique du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies?’, 46 RBDI (2013) 232–55.Google Scholar
Hajjami, N., ‘The Intervention of the United States and Other Eastern Caribbean States in Grenada – 1983’, in Ruys, et al. (2018) 385–95.Google Scholar
Hakimi, M., ‘To Condone or Condemn? Regional Enforcement Actions in the Absence of Security Council Authorization’, 40 Vand J Transnat’l L (2007) 643–86.Google Scholar
Hakimi, M., ‘The Jus ad Bellum’s Regulatory Form’, 112 AJIL (2018) 151–90.Google Scholar
Harrell, P., ‘Modern-Day “Guarantee Clauses” and the Legal Authority of Multinational Organizations To Authorize the Use of Military Force’, 33 Yale J Int Law (2008) 417–46.Google Scholar
Helal, M., ‘The ECOWAS Intervention in The Gambia – 2016’, in Ruys, et al. (2018) 912–47.Google Scholar
Henderson, C., The Use of Force and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Henkin, L., ‘Kosovo and the Law of ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, 93 AJIL (1999) 824–8.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., The Development of International Law through the Political Organs of the United Nations (Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Higgins, R., ‘The Development of International Law by the Political Organs of the United Nations’, Proceedings ASIL (1965) 116–24.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., United Nations Peace Keeping: Documents and Commentary, Vol. II, Asia 1946–1967 (Oxford University Press, 1970a).Google Scholar
Higgins, R., ‘The United Nations and Lawmaking: The Political Organs’, 37 Proceedings ASIL (1970b) 37–47.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., Problems and Process. International Law and How We Use It (Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Higgins, R., ‘Some Thoughts on the Evolving Relationship between the Security Council and NATO’, in Boutros Boutros-Ghali Amicorum Discipulorumque Liber, Vol. I, 511 (Bruylant, 1998).Google Scholar
Higgins, R., ‘A Babel of Judicial Voices? Ruminations from the Bench’, 55 ICLQ (2006) 791–804, reproduced in Higgins, , Themes and Theories (2009) 1256–68.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., ‘The United Nations at 70 Years: The Impact upon International Law’, 65 ICLQ (2016) 1–19.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., ‘The United Nations and International Law’, in Higgins, et al., Oppenheim’s International Law: United Nations (2017a) 413–28.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., Webb, P., Akande, D., Sivakumaran, S., Sloan, J. (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law: United Nations (Oxford University Press, 2017b).Google Scholar
ILA, Accountability of International Organizations, Final Report (Berlin, 2004), available at https://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1058&StorageFileGuid=04c9caf1-2834-4490-9125-7d9ba3683246.Google Scholar
ILA, Committee on the Use of Force, 2010–18, Final Report on Aggression and the Use of Force (Sydney, 2018), available at ila-hq.org/images/ILA/DraftReports/DraftReport_UseOfForce.pdf.Google Scholar
ILC, Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II, Part Two (2011).Google Scholar
Informal Inter-Allied Committee on the Future of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Report, published in 39 AJIL (1945) Supp., 1–42.Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, Responsibility to Protect, Report, 2001, available at https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/18432/IDL-18432.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Jenks, C., ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’, 30 BYIL (1953) 401–53.Google Scholar
Johnson, L., ‘“Uniting for Peace”: Does it Still Serve Any Useful Purpose?’, 108 AJIL Unbound (2014) 106–15.Google Scholar
Johnstone, I., ‘When the Security Council Is Divided’, in Weller, (2015) 227–50.Google Scholar
Johnstone, I., ‘The Security Council and International Law’, in von Einsiedel, et al. (2016) 771–92.Google Scholar
Joyner, D., ‘Legal Bindingness of Security Council Resolutions Generally, and Resolution 2334 on the Israeli Settlements in Particular’, EJIL:Talk!, 9 January 2017, with comments, available at www.ejiltalk.org/legal-bindingness-of-security-council-resolutions-generally-and-resolution-2334-on-the-israeli-settlements-in-particular/.Google Scholar
Kadelbach, S., ‘Interpretation of the Charter’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Keeler, C., ‘The End of the Responsibility to Protect?’, Foreign Policy Journal, 12 October 2011, available at www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/10/12/the-end-of-the-responsibility-to-protect/.Google Scholar
Kendal, D., Denmark and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P): How Denmark Can Further Contribute to the Prevention of Mass Atrocities, paper commissioned by the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2013), available at http://um.dk/en/danida-en/partners/research/other//~/media/UM/English-site/Docu-ments/Danida/Partners/Research-Org/Research-studies/Denmark%20and%20the%20Responsibility%20to%20Protect%202013.pdf.Google Scholar
Kindiki, K., ‘The Normative and Institutional Framework of the African Union Relating to the Protection of Human Rights and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security: A Critical Appraisal’, in 3 AHRLJ (2003) 97–117.Google Scholar
Kioko, B., ‘The Right of Intervention under the African Union’s Constitutive Act: From Non-interference to Non-intervention’, 85 Int Rev Red Cross (2003) 807–24.Google Scholar
Kirgis, J., ‘Security Council Resolution 1483 on the Rebuilding of Iraq’, 8 (13)AJIL Insights, 6 June 2003, available at www.asil.org/insights/volume/8/issue/13/security-council-resolution-1483-rebuilding-iraq.Google Scholar
Knoll, B., The Legal Status of Territories Subject to Administration by International Organizations (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Kokott, J., and Sobotta, C., ‘The Kadi Case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance?’, 23(4) EJIL (2012) 1015–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, R., L’article 103 de la Charte des Nations Unies (Hague Academy, 2014).Google Scholar
Kreß, C., and Nußberger, B., ‘Pro-democratic Intervention in Current International Law: The Case of the Gambia in January 2017’, 4 JUFIL (2017) 239–52.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., and Nußberger, B., ‘The Entebbe Raid – 1976’, in Ruys, et al. (2018) 220–33.Google Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘Article 39’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘Article 40’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Krisch, N., ‘Article 41’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Kuwali, D., ‘Article 4(h) + R2P: Towards a Doctrine of Persuasive Prevention to End Mass Atrocity Crimes’, 3 Interdiscip J Hum Rights Law (2008) 55–85.Google Scholar
Kuwali, D., ‘The End of Humanitarian Intervention: Evaluation of the African Union’s Right of Intervention’, 9 AJCR (2009) 41–62.Google Scholar
Kuwali, D., ‘What Is “Intervention” under Article 4(h)’, in Kuwali, D and Viljoen, F. (eds.), Africa and the Responsibility to Protect: Article 4(h) of the African Union Constitutive Act (Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Lagerwall, A., ‘Threats of and Actual Military Strikes Against Syria – 2013 and 2017’, in Ruys, et al. (2018) 828–54.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, E., ‘The Legal Effects of Illegal Acts of International Organizations’, in Cambridge Essays in International Law: Essays in honour of Lord McNair (Cambridge University Press, 1965) 88–121.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., The Development of International Law by the Permanent Court of International Justice (Longmans, Green & Co., 1934).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., ‘The Covenant as the “Higher Law”’, 17 BYIL (1936) 54–65.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., Aspects of the Administration of International Justice (Cambridge, Grotius, 1991).Google Scholar
Lamb, S., ‘Legal Limits to UN Security Council Powers’, in Goodwin-Gill, G. and Talmon, S. (eds.), The Reality of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie (Oxford University Press, 1999) 361–88.Google Scholar
Lemos, M., ‘Jus Cogens Versus the Chapter VII Powers of the Security Council: With Particular References to Humanitarian Intervention and Terrorism’, 19 Chin J Int Law (2020) 1–52.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K., ‘The Kadi Saga and the Rule of Law within the EU’, 67 SMU Law Rev (2014) 707–15.Google Scholar
Lentner, G., The UN Security Council and the International Criminal Court: The Referral Mechanism in Theory and Practice (Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar
Lewis, D., Modirzadeh, N., and Blum, G., Quantum of Silence: Inaction and jus ad bellum, Harvard Law School Program of International Law and Armed Conflict (2019), available at https://pilac.law.harvard.edu/quantum-of-silence.Google Scholar
Lowe, V., Roberts, A., Welsh, J., and Zaum, D. (eds.), The United Nations Security Council and War: The Evolution of Thought and Practice since 1945 (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Lubell, N., and Wood, M., ‘The ILA’s 2018 Report on Aggression and the Use of Force’, 6 JUFIL (2019).Google Scholar
Luck, E., UN Security Council. Practice and Promise (Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Malone, D. (ed.), The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century (Lynne Rienner, 2004).Google Scholar
Malone, D. ‘An Evolving UN Security Council’, 47 Indian J Int Law (2007) 594–615.Google Scholar
Marauhn, T. ‘North Atlantic Treaty Organization’, MPEPIL (2016).Google Scholar
Matheson, M., Council Unbound: The Growth of UN Decision Making on Conflict and Postconflict Issues after the Cold War (United States Institute of Peace, 2006).Google Scholar
Mendelson, M., and Hulton, S., ‘The Iraq-Kuwait Boundary’, 64 BYIL (1993) 135–95.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M., ‘Can UNSC Presidential Statements Be Legally Binding?’, EJIL:Talk!, 15 April 2009a, available at www.ejiltalk.org/can-unsc-presidential-statements-be-legally-binding/.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M., ‘The Human Rights Committee’s Views in Sayadi v. Belgium: A Missed Opportunity’, 1 Goettingen Journal of International Law (2009b) 519–38.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M., ‘European Court Decides Nada v. Switzerland’, EJIL:Talk!, 14 September 2012, www.ejiltalk.org/european-court-decides-nada-v-switzerland/.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M., ‘Grand Chamber Judgment in Al-Dulimi v. Switzerland’, EJIL:Talk!, 23 June 2016, www.ejiltalk.org/grand-chamber-judgment-in-al-dulimi-v-switzerland/.Google Scholar
Murphy, S., ‘Assessing the Legality of Invading Iraq’, 92 Georgetown Law J (2004) 173–258.Google Scholar
Nasu, H., International Law on Peacekeeping: A Study of Article 40 of the UN Charter (Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).Google Scholar
Neri, K., ‘Security Council’s Contribution to the Evolution of the Law of the Sea: Avant Garde or Self-Limitation?’, in Ribeiro, M., Bastos, F., and Henriksen, T. (eds.), Global Challenges and the Law of the Sea (Springer, 2020) 177–90.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E., Tams, C., and Tladi, D., Max Planck Trialogues, Vol. 1: Self-Defence against Non-State Actors (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, K., ‘Article 94’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Oellers-Frahm, K., ‘Article 41’, in Zimmermann et al. (2019).Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A., Peremptory Norms of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Österdahl, I., ‘The Exception as the Rule: Lawmaking on Force and Human Rights by the UN Security Council’, 10 J Conflict & Sec Law (2005) 1–20.Google Scholar
Paulus, A., and Leiß, J., ‘Article 103’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Article 25’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Peters, A., (2021–) and Wolfrum, R. (2004–20) (eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008–), available at www.mpepil.com/.Google Scholar
Popovski, V., and Fraser, T. (eds.), The Security Council as Global Legislator (Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Randelzhofer, A., and Nolte, G., ‘Article 51’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Ratner, S., ‘The Security Council and International Law’, in Malone, (2004) 591–605.Google Scholar
Reinisch, A., and Novak, G., ‘Article 48’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Reisman, M., ‘Editorial, Termination of the USSR’s Treaty Right of Intervention in Iran’, 74 AJIL (1980) 144–54.Google Scholar
Reisman, M., ‘Humanitarian Intervention and Fledgling Democracies’, 18 Fordham Int Law J (1994) 794–805.Google Scholar
Reisman, M., and Stevick, D., ‘The Applicability of International Law Standards to United Nations Economic Sanctions Programme’, 9 EJIL (1998) 86–141.Google Scholar
Roberts, A., ‘Legality vs. Legitimacy: Can Uses of Force be Illegal but Justified?’, in Alston, P. and Macdonald, E. (eds.), Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force (Oxford University Press, 2008) 179–213.Google Scholar
Rosand, E., ‘The Security Council as “Global Legislator”: Ultra Vires or Ultra Innovative?’, 28 Fordham Int Law J (2004) 542–90.Google Scholar
Russell, R., A History of the United Nations Charter: The Role of the United States, 1940–1945 (Brookings Institute Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Ruys, T., Corten, O., and Hofer, A. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Sands, P., and Klein, P., Bowett’s Law of International Institutions (6th ed., Sweet and Maxwell, 2009).Google Scholar
Sassòli, M., International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare (Edward Elgar, 2019).Google Scholar
Schabas, W., ‘Accountability for International Crimes – Special Tribunals and Referrals to the International Criminal Court’, in Gesner, J. and Ugarte, B. Stagno (eds.), The United Nations Security Council in the Age of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014) 173–94.Google Scholar
Schermers, H., and Blokker, N., International Institutional Law (6th rev. ed., Brill, 2018).Google Scholar
Schweigman, D., The Authority of the Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: Legal Limits and the Role of the International Court of Justice (Kluwer, 2001).Google Scholar
Security Council Report, Special Research Report No. 3: Security Council Transparency, Legitimacy and Effectiveness: Efforts to Reform Council Working Methods 1993–2007, 18 October 2007, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Research%20Report_Working%20Methods%2018%20Oct%2007.pdf.Google Scholar
Security Council Report, Special Research Report No. 1: Security Council Action under Chapter VII: Myths and Realities, 3 June 2008, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/research-reports/lookup-c-glkwlemtisg-b-4202671.php.Google Scholar
Security Council Report, Special Research Report No. 1: Security Council Working Methods – A Work in Progress?, 30 March 2010, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Research%20Report%20Working%20Methods%202010.pdf.Google Scholar
Security Council Report, Cross-Cutting Report on the Rule of Law, 28 October 2011, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/XCutting%20Rule%20of%20Law%202011.pdf.Google Scholar
Security Council Report, Security Council Working Methods: A Tale of Two Councils?, 25 March 2014, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/special_research_report__working_methods_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Security Council Report, The Veto, 19 October 2015, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/research-reports/the-veto.php.Google Scholar
Security Council Report, The Rule of Law: Can the Security Council Make Better Use of the International Court of Justice?, 20 December 2016, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/research_report_5_rule_of_law_2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Security Council Report, Can the Security Council Prevent Conflict?, 9 February 2017, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/research_report_conflict_prevention_2017.Google Scholar
Security Council Report, In Hindsight: The Security Council in 2019, 31 January 2020, available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/monthly-forecast/2020-02/in-hindsight-the-security-council-in-2019.php.Google Scholar
Sheeran, S., ‘The Use of Force in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations’, in Weller, (2015) 347–74.Google Scholar
Sievers, L., and Daws, S., The Procedure of the UN Security Council (4th ed., Oxford University Press, 2014), with updates at www.scprocedure.org.Google Scholar
Simma, B., ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’, 10 EJIL (1999) 1–22.Google Scholar
Simma, B. (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Simma, B., Khan, D.-E., Nolte, G., and Paulus, A. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Spiermann, O., ‘Historical Introduction’, in Zimmermann et al. (2019).Google Scholar
Stahn, C., ‘Terrorist Acts as “Armed Attack”: The Right to Self-Defense, Article 51(½) of the UN Charter, and International Terrorism’, 27 Fletcher Forum World Aff (2003) 35–54.Google Scholar
Sthoeger, E., ‘International Courts and Tribunals’, in von Einsiedel, et al. (2016) 507–26.Google Scholar
Suyash, P., ‘The Primacy of Regional Organizations in International Peacekeeping: The African Example’, 51 Va J Int Law (2010) 185–230.Google Scholar
Talmon, S., ‘The Statements by the President of the Security Council’, 2 Chin J Int Law (2003) 419–65.Google Scholar
Talmon, S., ‘Security Council Treaty Action’, 62 RHDI (2009) 65–116.Google Scholar
Talmon, S., ‘Article 2(6)’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Tavernier, P., ‘Les déclarations du Président du Conseil de sécurité’, 39 AFDI (1993) 101.Google Scholar
Thirlway, H., The Sources of International Law (2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Tladi, D. (ed.), Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens): Disquisitions and Disputations (Brill, 2021).Google Scholar
Trahan, J., Existing Legal Limits to Security Council Veto Power in the Face of Atrocity Crimes (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Traoré, S. B., L’interprétation des résolutions du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies: Contribution à la théorie de l’interprétation dans la société internationale (Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, 2020).Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A., Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A., ‘Theorizing or Negotiating the Law? A Response to Devika Hovell’, 110 AJIL Unbound 3 (2016) 3–7.Google Scholar
Van den Herik, L., and Schrijver, N., ‘Leiden Policy Recommendations on Counter-terrorism and International Law’, 57 NILR (2010) 531–50.Google Scholar
von Einsiedel, S., Malone, D., Stagno Ugarte, B. (eds.), The UN Security Council in the 21st Century (Lynne Rienner, 2016).Google Scholar
Walter, C., ‘Article 52’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Walter, C., ‘Article 53’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Weller, M., (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Weller, M., ‘The Iraq War – 2003’, in Ruys, et al. (2018) 639–61.Google Scholar
White, N., ‘The UN Charter and Peacekeeping Forces: Constitutional Issues’, 3 Int Peacekeeping (1996) 43–63.Google Scholar
Wilde, R., International Territorial Administration (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., ‘The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force in Self-Defence’, 55 ICLQ (2006) 963.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., and Wood, M., ‘Self-Defense Against Nonstate Actors: Reflections on the “Bethlehem Principles”’, 107 AJIL (2013) 390–5.Google Scholar
Winkelmann, I., ‘United Nations Charter, Amendment’, in MPEPIL (2007).Google Scholar
Wippman, D., ‘Pro-Democratic Intervention’, in Weller (2015) 797–815.Google Scholar
Witschel, G., ‘Article 108’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Witschel, G., ‘Article 109’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R., ‘Legitimacy in International Law’, MPEPIL (2011).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R., ‘Article 1’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Security Council Working Methods and Procedure: Recent Developments’, 45 ICLQ (1996) 150–61.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘The Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions’, 2 MPUNYB (1998) 73–96.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘The Demonization of the Security Council’, ILA Swedish Branch, 10 May 2004, available at www.sirmichaelwood.net.Google Scholar
Wood, M., Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures 2006, ‘The UN Security Council and International Law’, available at www.lcil.cam.ac.uk/press/events/2006/11/lauterpacht-lectures-2006-united-nations-security-council-and-international-law-sir-michael-wood.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Iraq, No-Fly Zones’, MPEPIL (2010).Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘The Law of Treaties and the UN Security Council: Some Reflections’, in Cannizzaro, E. (ed.), The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press, 2011) 244–55.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘The International Law on the Use of Force. What Happens in Practice?’, 53 Indian J Int Law (2013) 345–67.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Self-Defence and Collective Security: Key Distinctions’, in Weller, (2015) 649–60.Google Scholar
Wood., M., ‘Symposium on the Iraq Inquiry’, 87 BYIL (2016a) 98–230.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘The Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions, Revisited’, 20 MPUNYB (2016b) 3–35.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘The Use of Force Against Da‘esh and the jus ad bellum’, 1 Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (2017a) 9–34.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Self-Defence Against Non-state Actors – A Practitioner’s View’, 77 ZaöRV (2017b) 75–7.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘The Caroline Incident – 1837’, in Ruys et al. (2018) 5–14.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Assessing Practice on the Use of Force’, 79 ZaöRV (2019) 655–8.Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Terrorism and the International Law on the Use of Force’, in Saul, B. (ed.), Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism (2nd ed., Edward Elgar, 2020) 180–91.Google Scholar
Zacklin, R., The Amendment of the Constitutive Instruments of the United Nations and Specialized Agencies (Sijthoff, 1968).Google Scholar
Zacklin, R., The United Nations Secretariat and the Use of Force in a Unipolar World: Power v. Principle (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Zaum, D., ‘The Security Council, the General Assembly, and War: The Uniting for Peace Resolution’, in Lowe, et al. (2008) 154–74.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., ‘Article 27’, in Simma et al. (2012).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., Tams, C., Oellers-Frahm, K., and Tomuschat, C. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×