Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General editors' preface
- General introduction
- Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science (1783)
- Metaphysical foundations of natural science (1786)
- On a discovery whereby any new critique of pure reason is to be made superfluous by an older one (1790)
- What real progress has metaphysics made in Germany since the time of Leibniz and Wolff? (1793/1804)
- On a recently prominent tone of superiority in philosophy (1796)
- Settlement of a mathematical dispute founded on misunderstanding (1796)
- Proclamation of the imminent conclusion of a treaty of perpetual peace in philosophy (1796)
- Editorial notes
- Glossary
- Index of names
- Index of subjects
Proclamation of the imminent conclusion of a treaty of perpetual peace in philosophy (1796)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- General editors' preface
- General introduction
- Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science (1783)
- Metaphysical foundations of natural science (1786)
- On a discovery whereby any new critique of pure reason is to be made superfluous by an older one (1790)
- What real progress has metaphysics made in Germany since the time of Leibniz and Wolff? (1793/1804)
- On a recently prominent tone of superiority in philosophy (1796)
- Settlement of a mathematical dispute founded on misunderstanding (1796)
- Proclamation of the imminent conclusion of a treaty of perpetual peace in philosophy (1796)
- Editorial notes
- Glossary
- Index of names
- Index of subjects
Summary
Section One
Happy Outlook for Imminent Perpetual Peace From the Lowest Level of Man's Living Nature to his Highest, that of Philosophy
Chrysippus says, in his pithy Stoic way: “Nature has given the pig a soul, instead of salt, so that he should not become rotten.” Now this is the lowest level of man's nature, prior to all cultivation, namely that of mere animal instinct. But it seems as if here the philosopher has thrown a prophetic glance into the physiological systems of our own day; save only that now, instead of the word ‘soul’, we have taken to using that of living force (and rightly so, since from an effect we can certainly infer to the force that produces it, but not forthwith to a substance specially adapted to this type of effect); we locate life, therefore, in the action of animating forces (life-impulse) and the ability to react to them (living-capacity), and call that man healthy in whom a proportionate stimulus produces neither an excessive nor an altogether too small effect: while conversely, the animalic operation of nature will pass over into a chemical one, which has decay as its consequence, so that it is not (as used to be thought) decay that must follow from and after death, but death that must follow from the preceding decay.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 , pp. 451 - 460Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
- 1
- Cited by