Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
It is not easy to discover from what cause the acrimony of a scholiast can naturally proceed … The various readings of copies, and different interpretations of a passage, seem to be questions that might exercise the wit, without engaging the passions … Perhaps the lightness of the matter may conduce to the vehemence of the agency; when the truth to be investigated is so near to inexistence, as to escape attention, its bulk is to be enlarged by rage and exclamation.
(Johnson, Preface to Shakespeare)For centuries one of the most striking characteristics of textual criticism has been its fondness for strongly coloured rhetoric. In the first part of this chapter I want to examine that rhetoric and ask what it implies about textual criticism as an activity. The penchant for denunciation that Johnson so effectively deflates will play a part in the discussion, but I am even more interested in the metaphors that textual critics employ, often without conscious reflection, in the course of their work. The second section focuses on the absence of proof in textual criticism and the central role played by persuasive argument, or rhetoric in another sense.
I
Areas of study characterize themselves by their preferred rhetorical modes. Particle physics is a good example, a field in which equations can be described as ‘beautiful’ or ‘elegant’ and where ‘quarks’ (a term derived from Joyce's Finnegans Wake) come in ‘flavours’ including ‘charm’ and ‘strange’. The terminology evokes an atmosphere of aesthetic pleasure touched by whimsy.
Textual criticism, by contrast, has gravitated towards images of crime and disease. Some of those images are so pervasive that their metaphorical character is largely forgotten, such as describing erroneous manuscript readings as ‘corrupt’ or calling manuscripts ‘witnesses’. But we also find more exuberant uses of such imagery, as in the following quotations from F. A. Wolf and Lachmann portraying textual difficulties as sites of illness or infection: Wolf Iusta recensio … emplastis solutis ulcera nudat (‘a true recension … takes off the bandages and lays bare the sores’); Lachmann Illa pestis ingruit, quae … pro uulneribus emplastra et foedissimas cicatrices reliquit’ (‘that plague breaks out which … leaves bandages and disgusting scars in place of wounds’).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.