Book contents
- Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece
- Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Early Intertextuality
- Part II Lyric and Epic
- Part III Drama
- Part IV Conceptual Contexts
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- Index Rerum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2024
Book contents
- Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece
- Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Early Intertextuality
- Part II Lyric and Epic
- Part III Drama
- Part IV Conceptual Contexts
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- Index Rerum
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Texts and Intertexts in Archaic and Classical Greece , pp. 301 - 336Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) (2012), Reading the Victory Ode, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlberg-Cornell, G. (1992), Myth and Epos in Early Greek Art: Representation and Interpretation, Jonsered.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. (2001), ‘The proem of Simonides’ Plataea Elegy and the circumstances of its performance’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ampolo, C. and Rosamilia, E. (2021), ‘Novità sulla cultura Achea e sui culti a Kaulonia: la Tabula Cauloniensis, editio minor’, 55–125 in Gli altri Achei: Kaulonia e Terina: contesti e nuovi apporti, Taranto.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ø. and Haug, D. (eds.) (2012), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. J. (1997), The Fall of Troy in Early Greek Poetry and Art, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andolfi, I. (2017), ‘An ambiguous literary genre. The origins of early Greek mythography’, Mnemosyne 70.2: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andolfi, I. (2018), ‘Rhapsody in prose? The contribution of Hecataeus of Miletus to archaic Greek literature’, QUCC 120: 77–106.Google Scholar
Andolfi, I. (2019), Acusilaus of Argos’ ‘Rhapsody in Prose’: Introduction, Text, and Commentary, Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrington, N. (2015), Ashes, Images and Memories: The Presence of the War Dead in Fifth-Century Athens, New York.Google Scholar
Bagordo, A. (2003), Reminiszenzen früher Lyrik bei den attischen Tragikern: Beiträge zur Anspielungstechnik und poetischen Tradition, Munich.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2013), The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2016), ‘Archaic epigram and the seal of Theognis’, in Sistakou, E. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Dialect, Diction and Style in Greek Literary and Inscribed Epigram, Berlin: 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. J. and Kahane, A. (eds.) (1997), Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance and the Epic Text, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.) (2002), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M. (eds.) (2013), Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballabriga, A. (1990), ‘La Question Homérique: pour une réouverture du débat’, Revue des Etudes Grecques 103: 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaudé, J.-F. (2006), ‘Hippias les passeur’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.), La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, Pisa: 287–304.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. (2012), ‘Returning to Troy: Herodotus and the mythic discourse of his own time’, in Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus’ Histories, Oxford: 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1993), ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and the Heroides’, HSCP 95: 333–65.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001a), ‘Simonides and Horace on the death of Achilles’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 255–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001b), Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets, London.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2015), Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative, tr. I. Marchesi and M. Fox, Princeton.Google Scholar
Barker, E. (2009), Entering the Agon: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography and Tragedy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barringer, J. M. (2005), ‘The temple of Zeus at Olympia: heroes and athletes’, Hesperia 74: 211–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barringer, J. and Lissarrague, F. (2021), Images at the Crossroads: Media and Meaning in Greek Art, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Barron, J. P. (1972), ‘New light on old walls: the murals of the Theseion’, JHS 92: 20–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumbach, M. (ed.) (2019), Die Seele im Kosmos: Porphyrios, Über die Nymphengrotte in der Odyssee, Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A., and Petrovic, I. (2010a), ‘Archaic and classical Greek epigram: an introduction’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. (eds.) (2010b), Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bažant, J. (1984), ‘Les vases athéniens et les réformes démocratiques’, in Bérard, C., Bron, C., and Pomari, A. (eds.), Images et société en Grèce ancienne: L’iconographie comme méthode d’analyse, Lausanne: 33–40.Google Scholar
Bažant, J. (1985), Les citoyens sur les vases athéniens du 6e au 4e siècle av. J.-C., Prague.Google Scholar
Beck, B. (2020), ‘Reassessing the scholiastic evidence for the Cretan Odyssey theory’, TAPA 150: 357–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1996), Poetarum epicorum Graecorum: Testimonia et fragmenta, 2nd ed., Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, L. (2001), ‘Hecataeus: from genealogy to historiography’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s’ Craft in the Age of Herodotus, Oxford: 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierl, A. and Lardinois, A. (eds.) (2016), The Newest Sappho: P. Sapph. Obbink and P. GC inv. 105, frs. 1–4, Leiden.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2009), The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. (2014), ‘Inscribed epigrams in and out of sequence’, in Harder, A., Regtuit, R., and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Hellenistic Poetry in Context, Leuven: 1–24.Google Scholar
Blümer, W. (2001), Interpretation archaischer Dichtung: Die mythologischen Partien der Erga Hesiods, 2 vols., Münster.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. (1972), ‘Herakles, Peisistratos and sons’, Revue Archéologique 1972: 57–72.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. (1983), ‘Symbol and story in Geometric art’, in Moon, W. G. (ed.), Ancient Greek Art and Iconography, Madison: 15–36.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (2000), ‘Herodotus’ genre(s)’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Matrices of Genre. Authors, Canons, and Society, Cambridge, MA: 97–114.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (2002), ‘Epic heritage and mythical patterns in Herodotus’, in Bakker, de Jong, and van Wees (2002): 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) (2001), The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeke, H. (2007), The Value of Victory in Pindar’s Odes: Gnomai, Cosmology and the Role of the Poet, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnafé, A. (1983), ‘Le rossignol et la justice en pleurs (Hésiode ‘Travaux’ 203–212)’, BAGB 4: 260–4.Google Scholar
Borg, B. E. (2010), ‘Epigrams in archaic art’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 81–99.Google Scholar
Borthwick, E. K. (1968a), ‘The dances of Philocleon and the sons of Carcinus in Aristophanes’ Wasps’, CQ 18: 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borthwick, E. K. (1968b), ‘Two unnoticed Euripidean fragments?’, CQ 18: 198–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. (1986), ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. (2008), ‘Sex and politics in Archilochus’ poetry’, in Katsonopoulou, D., Petropoulos, I., and Katsarou, S. (eds.), Sex and Politics in Archilochus’ Poetry, Athens: 133–43.Google Scholar
Braswell, B. K. (1982), ‘The song of Ares and Aphrodite: theme and relevance to Odyssey 8’, Hermes 110: 129–37.Google Scholar
Brown, C. G. (1995), ‘The parched furrow and the loss of youth: Archilochus fr. 188 West’, QUCC 50: 29–35.Google Scholar
Brown, C. G. (2016), ‘Warding off a hailstorm of blood’, in Carey and Swift (2016): 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C. G. (2019), ‘Phrasikleia: playing with signs’, in Harrisson, J. (ed.), Imagining the Afterlife in the Ancient World, Abingdon: 33–48.Google Scholar
Brügger, C., Stoevesandt, M., and Visser, E. (2003), Homers Ilias. Gesamtkommentar. Band II: Zweiter Gesang (B). Faszikel 2: Kommentar, Munich.Google Scholar
Brügger, C., Stoevesandt, M., and Visser, E. (2017), Homer’s Iliad: The Basel Commentary. Book XXIV, tr. Millis, B. W. and Strack, S. and ed. Olson, S. D., Boston and Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruit, L. (1984), ‘Sacrifices à Delphes: sur deux figures d’Apollon’, RHR 201: 339–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchner, G. and Russo, C. F. (1955), ‘La Coppa di Nestore e un’insrizione metrica da Pitecusa dell’VIII Secolo Av. Cr.’, RAL 10, 215–34.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T. (eds.) (2018), Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. S. (2001), The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. (2006), ‘Neoanalysis, orality, and intertextuality: an examination of Homeric motif transference’, Oral Tradition 21: 148–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. S. (2012), ‘Intertextuality without text in early Greek epic’, in Andersen and Haug (2012): 168–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. S. (2017), ‘The apologos of Odysseus: tradition and conspiracy theories’, in Tsagalis, C. and Markantonatos, A. (eds.), The Winnowing Oar: New Perspectives in Homeric Studies: Studies in Honour of Antonios Rengakos, Berlin: 95–120.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1976), ‘Das hunderttorige Theben und die Datierung der llias’, WS 89: 5–21 [= (2001) 59–71].Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1987), ‘The making of Homer in the sixth century B.C.: rhapsodes versus Stesichoros’, in Papers on the Amasis Painter and his World: Colloquium Sponsored by the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities and Symposium Sponsored by the J. Paul Getty Museum, Malibu: 43–62. [= (2001) 198–217 and Cairns (2001): 92–116].Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2004), ‘Mikroskopie der Geistesgeschichte: Bruno Snells “Entdeckung des Geistes” im kritischen Rückblick’, Philologus 148: 168–82.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (1998), ‘Spontaneity, savaging, and praise in Pindar’s sixth paean’, AJP 119: 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, S., Fish, J., and Obbink, D. (2014), ‘New Fragments of Book 1 of Sappho’, ZPE 189: 1–28.Google Scholar
Caciagli, S. (2016), ‘Wishing Charaxos a safe trip?’, in Bierl and Lardinois (2016): 424–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. (2017), ‘Beauty, fame and politics in Ibycus S151 PMGF’, Prometheus 43: 43–55.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2012), ‘La memoria poetica nei canti di Saffo: performance musicale e creazione sociale’, in Riu and Pòrtulas (2012): 45–97.Google Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. (2015), Hesiod’s Works and Days: How to Teach Self-Sufficiency, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. (2017), ‘Fraternal conflict in Hesiod’s Works and Days’, in Bassino, P., Canevaro, L.-G., and Graziosi, B. (eds.), Conflict and Consensus in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry, Cambridge: 173–89.Google Scholar
Cannatà Fera, M. (1986), ‘Pindaro interprete di Omero in Pyth. 3, 81–2’, GIF 38: 85–9.Google Scholar
Cantieni, R. (1942), Die Nestorerzählung im XI. Gesang der Ilias (V 670–762), PhD diss. Zurich.Google Scholar
Capra, A. and Curti, M. (1995), ‘Semidei Simonidei: note sull’elegia di Simonide per la battaglia di Platea (P.Oxy. 3965 frr.1–2 + 2327 fr. 6 + 27 col. i)’, ZPE 107: 27–32.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1981), A Commentary on Five Odes of Pindar: Pythian 2, Pythian 9, Nemean 1, Nemean 7, Isthmian 8, New York.Google Scholar
Carey, C. and Swift, L. (eds.) (2016), Greek Iambus and Elegy: New Approaches, Oxford.Google Scholar
Carpino, A. A. (1996), ‘The delivery of Helen’s egg: an examination of an Etruscan relief mirror’, EtrStud 3: 33–44.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (2015), Polycrates, Tyrant of Samos: New light on Archaic Greece, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Catenacci, C. (2002), ‘Simonide, fr. 11, 17 W.2 (Elegia per la battaglia di Platea)’, in Celentano (2002): 29–33.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. (2013), Ancient Greek Letter Writing: A Cultural History (600 BC–150 BC), Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celentano, M. S. (ed.) (2002), ΤΕΡΨΙΣ: in ricordo di Maria Laetitia Coletti, Alessandria.Google Scholar
Chiasson, C. (2003), ‘Herodotus’ use of Attic tragedy in the Lydian Logos’, CA 22: 5–35.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. (1989), ‘Tra epos e storia: la genealogia di Cianippo e dei Biantidi in Ibico (Suppl.Lyr.Gr. 151 Page), e nelle fonti mitografiche greche’, ZPE 79: 27–38.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (2004), Archilochos heros: The Cult of Poets in the Greek Polis, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2001), ‘The New Simonides and Homer’s hemitheoi’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 182–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2011), Homer’s Trojan Theatre: Space, Vision, and Memory in the Iliad, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, W. (1987), Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clements, A. (2015), ‘Divine scents and presence’, in Bradley, M. (ed.), Smell and the Ancient Senses, London and New York: 46–59.Google Scholar
Cohen, B. (2000), ‘Man-killers and their victims: inversions of the heroic ideal in classical art’, in Cohen, B. (ed.), Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art, Leiden: 98–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coldstream, J. N. (1991), ‘The Geometric Style: birth of the picture’, in Rasmussen, T. and Spivey, N. (eds.), Looking at Greek Vases, Cambridge: 37–56.Google Scholar
Colesanti, G. and Giordano, M. (eds.) (2014), Submerged Literature in Ancient Greek Culture. Volume 1: An Introduction, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collard, C., Cropp, M. J., and Gibert, J. (eds.) (2004), Euripides: Selected Fragmentary Plays II, Oxford.Google Scholar
Condilo, C. (2017), ‘Agonistic intertextuality: Herodotus’ engagement with Hecataeus on genealogies’, Journal of Ancient History 5.2: 228–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti Bizzarro, F. (1999), Poetica e critica letteraria nei frammenti dei poeti comici greci, Naples.Google Scholar
Coo, L. (2018), ‘Sophocles’ wedding cakes (Eris fr. 199)’, Mnemosyne 71: 938–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coo, L. (2022), ‘A judgment of parodies? ‘Momus’ on a black-figure hydria in Chicago’, Mouseion 19.2: 175–95.Google Scholar
Cook, R. M. (1983), ‘Art and epic in archaic Greece’, Bulletin van de Vereeniging tot Bevorderung der Kennis van de Antike Beschauing (BABesch) 58: 1–10.Google Scholar
Corrêa, P. d. C. (2007), ‘A human fable and the justice of beasts in Archilochus’, in Finglass, P. J., Collard, C., and Richardson, N. J. (eds.), Hesperos: Studies in Ancient Greek Poetry Presented to M. L. West on his Seventieth Birthday, Oxford: 101–17.Google Scholar
Cousland, J. R. C. and Hume, J. (eds.) (2013), The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp, Leiden.Google Scholar
Craik, E. (1990), ‘The staging of Sophokles’ Philoktetes and Aristophanes’ Birds’, in Craik, E. (ed.), ‘Owls to Athens’: Essays on Classical Subjects presented to Sir Kenneth Dover, Oxford: 81–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropp, M. J. et al. (eds.) (1986), Greek Tragedy and its Legacy: Papers Presented to D. J. Conacher, Calgary.Google Scholar
Currie, B. G. F. (2006), ‘Homer and the early epic tradition’, in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F., and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin by Former Pupils, Oxford: 1–46.Google Scholar
Currie, B. G. F. (2021), ‘Intertextuality in early Greek Poetry: the special case of epinician’, Trends in Classics 13: 347–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, B. G. F. (forthcoming), ‘Theogonic allusions in the Iliad’, in Bing, P., Faulkner, A., and Höschele, R. (eds.), Arts of Allusion: Greek Intertextuality over Time.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (1992), ‘Pindaro, Peana VIIb (fr.52 h Sn.M.)’, in El-Mosalamy (1992): I.353–73.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (1995), ‘Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini (Parm. frr. 1+6 D.–K.; Pind. Ol. VI 22–7; pae. VIIb 10–20)’, SIFC 88: 143–81.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2004), ‘Textual fluctuations and cosmic streams: Ocean and Acheloios’, JHS 124: 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2005), ‘Ordered from the Catalogue: Pindar, Bacchylides, and Hesiodic genealogical poetry’, in Hunter, R. (ed.), The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women, Cambridge: 217–38.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2018), ‘Fiction and pragmatics in ancient Greek lyric: the case of Sappho’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018): 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2019), ‘Textual notes on the “newest” Sappho (on Sappho, fragments 5, 9, 17 V., and the Kypris poem)’, ZPE 211: 18–31.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (forthcoming), ‘The persuasion of songs from archaic lyric to Plato’s Laws’.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. F. (1995), ‘Homer and Sophocles’ Philoctetes’, in Griffiths, A. (ed.), Stage Directions: Essays in Ancient Drama in Honour of E. W. Handley, London: 25–35.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. F. (2012), ‘The Homer of tragedy: epic sources and models in Sophocles’, in Markantonatos, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Sophocles, Leiden: 245–61.Google Scholar
Davison, J. A. (1955), ‘Quotations and allusions in early Greek literature’, Eranos 53: 125–40 [= (1968) 70–85].Google Scholar
Davison, J. A. (1968), From Archilochus to Pindar: Papers on Greek Literature of the Archaic Period, London.Google Scholar
Day, J. W. (1994), ‘Interactive offerings: early Greek dedicatory epigrams and ritual’, HSCP 96: 37–74.Google Scholar
Day, J. W. (2007), ‘Poems on stone: the inscribed antecedents of Hellenistic epigram’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram, Leiden: 29–48.Google Scholar
Day, J. W. (2019), ‘The “spatial dynamics” of archaic and classical Greek epigram: conversations among locations, monuments, texts and viewer-readers’, in Petrovic, Petrovic, and Thomas (2019): 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degani, E. (1975), ‘Πάρεξ το θεῖον χρῆμα nel nuovo Archiloco di Colonia’, QUCC 20: 229.Google Scholar
Degani, E. (1990), ‘Due note di lettura (Arch. fr. 196a, 15 W.2; Musae. 283)’, Eikasmos 1: 193–5.Google Scholar
Del Corso, L. (2003), ‘Materiali per una protostoria del libro e delle pratiche di lettura nel mondo greco’, Segno e Testo 1: 5–78.Google Scholar
Dell’Oro, F. (2013), ‘Après l’inscription de la coupe de Nestor: disposition du texte et formes de transtextualité dans les épigrammes de l’époque archaïque en Grande Grèce et Sicile’, Gaia 16: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derderian, K. (2001), Leaving Words to Remember: Greek Mourning and the Advent of Literacy, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M. (1998), Apollon le couteau à la main: une approche expérimentale du polythéisme grec, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Benedetto, V. (2003), ‘Da Pindaro a Callimaco: Peana 7b, vv. 11–14’, Prometheus 29: 269–82.Google Scholar
Donelli, G. (2016), ‘Herodotus and Greek lyric poetry’, in Liotsakis, V. and Farrington, S. (eds.), The Art of History: Literary Perspectives on Greek and Roman Historiography, Berlin and Boston: 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dué, C. (2019), Achilles Unbound: Multiformity and tradition in the Homeric epics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Dufner, C. M. (1988), The Odyssey in the Argonautica: Reminiscence, Revision, Reconstruction, PhD diss. Princeton.Google Scholar
Duplouy, A. (2006), Le prestige des élites: recherches sur les modes de reconnaissance sociale en Grèce entre les Xe et Ve siècles avant J.-C., Paris.Google Scholar
Durey, J. F. (1991), ‘The state of play and interplay in intertextuality’, Style 25: 16–35.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. C. (2011), ‘Teasing and pleasing in Archilochus’ First Cologne Epode’, ZPE 179: 11–19.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. C. (2017), ‘Pindar’s Olympian 1, 1–7 and its relation to Bacchylides 3, 85–87’, WS 130: 7–32.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. (2013), Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1991), The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. 5: Books 17–20, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Mosalamy, A. H. S. (ed.) (1992), Proceedings of the XIXth International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo, 2–9 September 1989, 2 vols., Cairo.Google Scholar
Erp Taalman Kip, A. M. van (2009), ‘Καὶ μήν, καὶ δή and ἤδη in tragedy and comedy’, in Bakker, E. J. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Leiden: 111–33.Google Scholar
Fabiani, R. (2003), ‘Epigrafi in Erodoto’, in Biraschi, A. M., Desideri, P., Rosa, S., and Zecchini, G. (eds.), L’uso dei documenti nella storiografia antica, Naples: 163–85.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. (2010), ‘Typologies of variation on a theme in archaic and classical metrical inscriptions’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 289–310.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.) (2015a), The Greek Epic Cycle and its Ancient Reception: A Companion, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. (2015b), ‘Introduction: klyklos, the epic cycle and cyclic poetry’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015a): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2011b), ‘The collection of Homeric Hymns: from the seventh to the third centuries BC’, in Faulkner (2011a): 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearn, D. (2007), Bacchylides: Politics, Performance, Poetic Tradition, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearn, D. (ed.) (2011), Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. (2014), ‘Kleos versus stone? Lyric poetry and contexts for memorialization’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.), Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature, Oxford: 231–53.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016), Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehling, D. (1971), Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot: Studien zur Erzählkunst Herodots, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2002), ‘La carraia di Omero e la via degli dei: sul Peana VIIb di Pindaro’, SemRom 5: 197–212.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2010), Sappho’s Gift: The Poet and her Community, tr. L. Prauscello and B. Acosta-Hughes, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2014), ‘Saffo e i suoi fratelli e altri brani del primo libro’, ZPE 192: 1–19.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. (eds.) (2015), Stesichorus in Context, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. (eds.) (2021a), The Cambridge Companion to Sappho, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. (2021b), ‘Introduction’, in Finglass, and Kelly, (2021a): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finglass, P., Rengakos, A., and Zimmerman, B. (eds.) (2020), More than Homer Knew – Studies on Homer and his Ancient Commentators in Honour of Franco Montanari, Berlin.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (1998), The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelberg, M. and Stroumsa, G. (eds.) (2003), Homer, the Bible, and Beyond: Literary and Religious Canons in the Ancient World, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. M. (1992), ‘Word-power, performance, and tradition’, The Journal of American Folklore 105: 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontenrose, J. (1966), ‘Typhon among the Arimoi’, in Wallach, L. (ed.), The Classical Tradition: Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of H. Caplan, Ithaca, NY: 64–82.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1997), ‘The inland ship: problems in the performance and reception of Homeric epic’, in Bakker and Kahane (1997): 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. (2002), The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. (2003), ‘From letters to literature: reading the “song culture” of classical Greece’, in Yunis, H. (ed.), Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, Cambridge: 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. (2009), ‘Plato’s two Hesiods’, in Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. (eds.), Plato and Hesiod, Oxford: 133–54.Google Scholar
Foster, M. (2017), The Seer and the City: Religion, Politics, and Colonial Ideology in Ancient Greece, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Fournier, J. and Hamon, P. (2007), ‘Les orphelins de guerre de Thasos : un nouveau fragment de la stèle des Braves (ca 360-350 av. J-C.)’, BCH 131: 309–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1997), ‘On the shoulders of giants’, in Hinds, S. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 39: Memoria, arte allusiva, intertestualità (Memory, Allusion, Intertextuality): 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (1996), ‘Herodotus and his contemporaries’, JHS 116: 62–87 (reprinted with minor revisions in R. Vignolo Munson (ed.), Herodotus 1. Herodotus and the Narrative of the Past, Oxford and New York (2013): 46–83).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (2004), ‘The Homeric question’, in Fowler, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer, Cambridge: 220–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (2009), ‘Thoughts on myth and religion in early Greek historiography’, Minerva 22: 21–39.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1951), Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums, New York (2nd ed. 1962 Munich, 3rd ed. 1975 Munich).Google Scholar
Fries, A. (2014), Pseudo-Euripides, ‘Rhesus’: Edited with Introduction and Commentary, Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, R. (2013), ‘Dancing letters: the Alphabetic Tragedy of Kallias’, in Gagné, R. and Hopman, M. G. (eds.), Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy, Cambridge: 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, R. (1990), From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry, London.Google Scholar
Garner, R. S. (2005), ‘Epic and other genres in the ancient Greek world’, in Foley, J. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epic, Oxford: 386–96.Google Scholar
Garner, R. S. (2011), Traditional Elegy: The Interplay of Meter, Tradition, and Context in Early Greek Poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gentili, B., Bernadini, P. A., Cingano, E., and Giannini, P. (1995), Pindaro: Le Pitiche, Milan.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. and Prato, C. (2002), Poetae elegiaci: testimonia et fragmenta, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. (1970), Euterpe: An Anthology of Early Greek Lyric, Elegiac, and Iambic Poetry, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gherchanoc, F. (2014), ‘Le jugement de Pâris et les jeux de vêtement dans la céramique attique aux VIe et Ve siècles avant notre ère’, in Huet, V. and Gherchanoc, F. (eds.), De la théâtralité du corps aux corps des dieux dans l’Antiquité, Brest: 125–41.Google Scholar
Gherchanoc, F. (2016), Concours de beauté et beautés du corps en Grèce ancienne : discours et pratiques, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Giangiulio, M. (ed.) (2005), Erodoto e il ‘modello erodoto’: formazione e trasmissione delle tradizioni storiche in Grecia, Trento.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. (1967), ‘“Arte allusiva” and Alexandrian epic poetry’, CQ 17: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibert, J. (2013), ‘Euripides’ Antiope and the quiet life’, in Cousland and Hume (2013): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. (2002), ‘“Cf. e.g.”: a typology of “parallels” and the role of commentaries on Latin poetry’, in Gibson and Kraus (2002): 331–58.Google Scholar
Giuliani, L. (2003), Bild und Mythos: Geschichte der Bilderzählung in der griechischen Kunst, Munich.Google Scholar
Giuliani, L. (2013), Image and Myth: A History of Pictorial Narration in Greek Art, tr. J. O’Donnell, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glei, R. F. (2019), ‘Littérature au troisième degré – Beispiele kreativer Rezeption von De antro nympharum’, in Baumbach (2019): 141–63.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2020), Preposterous Poetics: The Politics and Aesthetics of Form in Late Antiquity, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (1994), ‘Introduction: programmatics and polemics’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, Cambridge: 1–11.Google Scholar
González, J. M. (2013), The Epic Rhapsode and his Craft: Homeric Performance in a Diachronic Perspective, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
González González, M. (2019), Funerary Epigrams of Ancient Greece: Reflections on Literature, Society and Religion, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, F. and Johnston, S. I. (2007), Ritual Texts for the Afterlife, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grand-Clément, A. (2010), ‘Dans les yeux d’Athéna Glaukôpis’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 12: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, H. (2004), ‘Heraclitus’ quarrel with polymathy and “historiê”’, TAPhA 134.2: 235–61.Google Scholar
Granger, H. (2007), ‘The theologian Pherecydes of Syros and the early days of natural philosophy’, HSCP 103: 135–63.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2009), ‘Hesiod in classical Athens: rhapsodes, orators, and Platonic discourse’, in Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. (eds.), Plato and Hesiod, Oxford: 111–32.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2013), ‘The poet in the Iliad’, in Marmodoro and Hill (2013): 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. (2009), ‘Greek Lyric and early Greek literary history’, in Budelmann, F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, Cambridge: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2009), The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2006b), ‘The manifold uses of the epic past: the embassy scene in Herodotus 7.153–63’, AJP 127.4: 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2010), The Greeks and their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century BC, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2017), ‘The best of the Achaeans? Odysseus and Achilles in the Odyssey’, in Tsagalis, C. and Markantonatos, A. (eds.), The Winnowing Oar: New Perspectives in Homeric Studies: Studies in Honour of Antonios Rengakos, Berlin: 121–44.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1977), ‘The Epic Cycle and the uniqueness of Homer’, JHS 97: 39–53 (= Cairns (2001): 365–84).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M. (1990), ‘Contest and contradiction in early Greek poetry’, in Griffith and Mastronarde (1990): 185–207.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. (2010), ‘Satyr play and tragedy, face to face’, in Taplin, O. and Wyles, R. (eds.), The Pronomos Vase and its Context, Oxford: 47–63 (= M. Griffith, Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies, Berkeley (2015): 129–45).Google Scholar
Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. (eds.) (1990), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of T.J. Rosenmeyer, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. D. (1993), ‘In the dark backward: time in Pindaric narrative’, Poetics Today 14: 607–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halleran, M. R. (1997), ‘It’s not what you say: unspoken allusions in Greek tragedy’, MD 39: 151–63.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. J. (1986), ‘Where three roads meet: a neglected detail in the Oedipus Tyrannus’, JHS 106: 187–90.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2008), Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampe, R. (1950), ‘Die Homerische Welt im Lichte der neuen Ausgrabungen: Nestor’, in Herbig, R. (ed.), Vermächtnis der antiken Kunst: Gastvorträge zur Jahrhundertfeier der Archäologischen Sammlungen der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg: 11–70.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. (2017), ‘Archives, repertoires, bodies and bones: thoughts on reperformance for classicists’, in Hunter and Uhlig (2017): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harden, S. and Kelly, A. D. (2014), ‘Proemic convention and character construction in early Greek epic’, HSCP 107: 1–34.Google Scholar
Haywood, J. and Mac Sweeney, N. (2018), Homer’s Iliad and the Trojan War: Dialogues on Tradition, London.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2001), Capturing Troy: The Narrative Functions of Landscape in Archaic and Early Classical Greek Art, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2011), ‘The Trojan War, theoxenia, and Aegina in Pindar’s Paean 6 and the Aphaia sculptures’, in Fearn (2011): 323–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2016), The Image of the Artist in Archaic and Classical Greece: Art, Poetry, and Subjectivity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. (2007), ‘The Muses’ uncanny lies: Hesiod, Theogony 27 and its translators’, AJP 182: 153–75.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. (2008), ‘Common people and leaders in Iliad book 2: the Invocation of the Muses and the Catalogue of Ships’, TAPA 138: 127–54.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1976), ‘The Cologne Epode and the conventions of early Greek erotic poetry’, Arethusa 9: 159–79.Google Scholar
Herington, C. J. (1985), Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S., and Hainsworth, J. B. (1988), A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey Volume I: Books 1–8, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1987), The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998), Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hirschberger, M. (2004), Gynaikōn katalogos und Megalai ēhoiai: ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten zweier hesiodeischer Epen, Munich.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2002), ‘Herodotus and his sources of information’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden: 373–86.Google Scholar
Howie, J. G. (1983), ‘The revision of myth in Pindar Olympian 1: the death and revival of Pelops (25–27; 36–66)’, PLLS 4: 277–313 [= (2012) 161–90].Google Scholar
Howie, J. G. (1998), ‘Thucydides and Pindar: The Archaeology and Nemean 7’, PLLS 10: 75–130 [= (2012) 265–306].Google Scholar
Howie, J. G. (2012), Exemplum and Myth, Criticism and Creation: Papers on Early Greek Literature, Leeds.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2004), ‘Homer and Greek literature’, in Fowler, R. L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer, Cambridge: 235–53.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2009), Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and its Uses, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2012), Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2014), Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2016), ‘The Hippias Minor and the traditions of Homeric criticism’, CCJ 62: 85–107.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2018), The Measure of Homer: The Ancient Reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.) (2017), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, A. (2020), ‘Homère chez Pindare : le “paradis” de la deuxième Olympique’, in Rengakos, Finglass, and Zimmermann (2020) : 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwit, J. (2011), ‘The shipwreck of Odysseus: strong and weak imagery in Late Geometric art’, AJA 115: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2001), Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2013), Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, E. (1998), ‘Biography, fiction, and the Archilochean “ainos”’, JHS 118: 177–83.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. (2018), ‘The end of the Histories and the end of the Atheno-Peloponnesian Wars’, in Harrison, T. and Irwin, E. (eds.), Interpreting Herodotus, Oxford: 279–334.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. (2021), ‘Date of composition’, in Baron, C. (ed.), The Herodotus Encyclopedia, Oxford: 1.409–12.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1918), ‘Studien zu den älteren griechischen Elegikern. I. Zu Tyrtaios’, Hermes 53: 1–44.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1982), Homer, Hesiod, and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2012), ‘πρῶτόν τε καὶ ὕστατον αἰὲν ἀείδειν: relative chronology and the literary history of the early Greek epos’, in Andersen and Haug (2012): 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janko, R. (2015), ‘From Gabii and Gordion to Eretria and Methone: the rise of the Greek alphabet’, BICS 58: 1–32.Google Scholar
Janowski, C. (1897), Observationes in nomina vestium a tragicis Graecis prolata, PhD diss. Berlin.Google Scholar
Jeffery, L. H. (1989), The Local Scripts of Archaic Greece, 2nd ed. rev. Johnston, A. W., Oxford.Google Scholar
Jendza, C. (2015), ‘Bearing swords and razors: paracomedy in Euripides’ Orestes’, AJP 136: 447–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. S. (2011), Writing Homer: A Study based on Results from Modern Fieldwork, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (1995), ‘Oral performance and the composition of Herodotus’ “Histories”’, GRBS 35: 229–54.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. I. (2015), ‘Narrating myths: story and belief in ancient Greece’, Arethusa 48: 173–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. de (1987), Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. de (2001), A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. de (2004), Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, 2nd ed., London.Google Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. de (2012a), ‘The Helen Logos and Herodotus’ fingerprint’, in Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus, Oxford: 127–42.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. and Montanari, F. (eds.) (2009), Eschyle à l’aube du théâtre occidental, Geneva.Google Scholar
Junker, K. (2012), Interpreting the Images of Greek Myths: An Introduction, tr. A. Künzl-Snodgrass and A. M. Snodgrass, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaczko, S. (2016), Archaic and Classical Attic Dedicatory Epigrams: An Epigraphic, Literary and Linguistic Commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kaempf-Dimitriadou, S. (1979), Die Liebe der Götter in der attischen Kunst des 5. Jahrhunderts v. Chr., Bern.Google Scholar
Kannicht, R. L. (1982), ‘Poetry and art: Homer and the monuments afresh’, Classical Antiquity 1: 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (2006), ‘Neoanalysis and the Nestorbedrängnis: a test case’, Hermes 134: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (2012), ‘The audience expects: Odysseus and Penelope’, in Minchin, E. (ed.), Orality, Literacy, and Performance in the Ancient World (Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World Volume 9), Leiden: 3–24.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (2015a), ‘Ilias Parva’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015a): 318–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (2015c), ‘Stesichorus’ Homer’, in Finglass, and Kelly, (2015): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (2018), ‘Homer’s rivals? Internal narrators within the Iliad’, in Ready, J. L. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.), Homer in Performance: Rhapsodes, Narrators, Characters, Austin: 351–77.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (2020), ‘With, or without, Homer: hearing the background in Sappho’, in Finglass, Rengakos, and Zimmermann (2020): 269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (2021), ‘Sappho and Epic’, in Finglass, and Kelly, (2021b): 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (2023), ‘Cyprias and the Cypria’, in Carvounis, K., Gavrielatos, A., Karla, G., and Papathomas, A. (eds.), Cyprus in Texts from Greco-Roman Antiquity, Leiden: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A. D. (forthcoming), ‘Homer and Hipponax’, in Cazzato, V. and Prodi, E. E. (eds.), The Limping Muse: Hipponax the Poet, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirk, A. (2021), Ancient Greek Lists: Catalogue and Inventory across Genres, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, J. and Dunn, F. (2002), ‘Heracles, Cercopes, and paracomedy’, TAPA 132: 29–61.Google Scholar
Kleberg, T. (1992), ‘Commercio librario ed editoria nel mondo antico’, in Cavallo, G. (ed.), Libri, editori e pubblico nel mondo antico. Guida storica e critica, 2nd ed., Rome and Bari: 25–79.Google Scholar
Knauer, G. (1964), Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Virgils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. (1974), ‘Pindar as innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the relevance of the Pelops story in Olympian 1’, CQ 24: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koning, H. H. (2010), Hesiod: The Other Poet: Ancient Reception of a Cultural Icon, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koning, H. H. (2018), ‘The Hesiodic question’, in Loney, A. C. and Scully, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hesiod, Oxford: 17–26.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. (2007), Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowerski, L. M. (2005), Simonides on the Persian Wars: A Study of the Elegiac Verses of the ‘New Simonides’, New York.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1972), ‘Naming and necessity’, in Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Dordrecht: 253–355 (rev. as Naming and Necessity, Oxford (1980)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krischer, T. (1965), ‘Die Entschuldigung des Sängers (Ilias Β 484–93)’, RhM 108: 1–11.Google Scholar
Kuhn-Treichel, T. (2021), ‘Pindar’s poetic “I” and the Muses: metaphorical role characterization in different genres’, CJ 116: 152–71.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1990), ‘Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the tradition of advice poetry’, TAPA 120: 85–107.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2005), ‘Choral lyric as “ritualization”: poetic sacrifice and poetic ego in Pindar’s sixth paian’, CA 24: 81–130.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2011), Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose, Princeton.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1992), ‘The Neoplatonists and the spiritualization of Homer’, in Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J. (eds.), Homer’s Ancient Readers, Princeton: 115–33.Google Scholar
Lämmle, R. (2018), ‘Zur Autor- und Stückzuweisung von P.Oxy. 1083 fr. 1 (S. **F 1130 R.)’, ZPE 208: 44–66.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. (1995), The Use of Gnomic Statements in Archaic Greek Poetry, PhD diss. Princeton.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. (2001), ‘Keening Sappho’, in Lardinois, A. and McClure, L. (eds.), Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society, Princeton: 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latacz, J. (1977), Kampfparänese, Kampfdarstellung und Kampfwirklichkeit in der Ilias, bei Kallinos und Tyrtaios, Munich.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. E. (2016), ‘Archilochus and Homer in the rhapsodic context’, in Swift and Carey (2016): 74–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavigne, D. E. (2019), ‘The authority of archaic Greek epigram’, in Petrovic, Petrovic, and Thomas (2019): 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzarini, M. L. (1976), ‘Le formule delle dediche votive nella Grecia arcaica’, Mem. Lincei 19: 47–354.Google Scholar
Leaf, W. (1886–8), The Iliad: Edited with English Notes and Introduction, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1976), ‘Fictions in literary biography: the new poem and the Archilochus legend’, Arethusa 9: 181–9.Google Scholar
Lidov, J. (2016), ‘Songs for sailors and lovers’, in Bierl and Lardinois (2016): 55–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligota, C. R. (1982), ‘“This story is not true”. Fact and fiction in antiquity’, JWI 45: 1–13.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. (1990), ‘Why satyrs are good to represent’, in Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context, Princeton: 228–36 (orig. pub. ‘Pourquoi les satyres sont-ils bons à montrer?’, in P. Ghiron-Bistagne and B. Schouler (eds.), Anthropologie et théâtre antique, Montpellier (1987), 93–106).Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2003), Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece, Swansea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzoni, A. (1995), ‘Platone “Novello Archilocho” e l’ “Aureo” Gorgia (Athen. XI 505de; Plat. Phaedr. 235d–236b)’, Eikasmos 6: 109–20.Google Scholar
Lougovaya, J. (2011), ‘The history of a motif in funerary epigrams from Karystos to the Phrygian hinterland’, in Rupp, D. and Tomlinson, J. (eds.), Euboea and Athens, Athens: 297–31.Google Scholar
Lovell, C. (2011), The Overburdened Earth: Landscape and Geography in Homeric Epic, PhD diss. Texas.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, S. (1992), ‘The use of vase-depictions in Homeric studies’, TAPA 122: 165–98.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, S. (1997), ‘Talking vases: the relationship between the Homeric poems and archaic representations of epic myth’, TAPA 127: 21–76.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, S. (2008), As Witnessed by Images: The Trojan War Tradition in Greek and Etruscan Art, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lulli, L. (2016), ‘Elegy and epic: a complex relationship’, in Swift and Carey (2016): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, N. (2001), ‘Local knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus, Oxford: 138–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, T. (2021), Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic Philosophers: Reading Xenophanes, Parmenides and Empedocles as Literature, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnani, M. (2009), ‘P. Oxy. LIX 3965 fr. 1 r. 6 + XXII 2327 fr. 6 r. 10 (Sim. Fr. 11,14 W.2 [= 3b,10 G.-P.])’, ZPE 168: 19–26.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1963), Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1982), Die Lieder des Bakchylides: Die Siegeslieder, 2 vols., Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990), ‘Fiddling the books: Heraclitus on Pythagoras (DK 22 B129)’, in Studies in the Historiography of Greek Philosophy, Assen and Maastricht: 443–8 (orig. pub. in K. J. Boudouris, (ed.), Ionian Philosophy, Athens (1989): 229–34).Google Scholar
Marconi, C. (2007), Temple Decoration and Cultural Identity in the Archaic Greek World: The Metopes of Selinus, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marg, W. (1956), ‘Das erste Lied des Demodokos’, in Navicula Chiloniensis: Studia philologa Felici Jacoby professori Chiloniensi emerito octogenario oblata, Leiden: 16–29.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1997), Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J. (2006), ‘Herodotus and the poetry of the past’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, Cambridge: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J. (2010), ‘The rhetoric of history: allusion, intertextuality, and exemplarity in historiographical speeches’, in Pausch, D. (ed.), Stimmen der Geschichte. Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie, Berlin and New York: 252–89.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.) (2013), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2001), ‘The consequences of dating the Cyclops’, in Joyal, M. (ed.), In altum: Seventy-Five Years of Classical Studies in Newfoundland, St John’s: 225–41.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (2005), ‘Epic as genre’, in Foley, J. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epic, Malden, MA and Oxford: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. P. (2009), ‘Gnomes in poems: wisdom performance on the Athenian stage’, in Karamalengou, E. and Makrygianni, E. (eds.), Ἀντιφίλησις: Studies on Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Literature and Culture in Honour of John-Theophanes A. Papademetriou, Stuttgart: 116–27.Google Scholar
Mastromarco, G. (2006), ‘La paratragodia, il libro, la memoria’, in Medda, E., Mirto, M., and Pattoni, M. (eds.), Komoidotragoidia: intersezioni del tragico e del comico nel teatro del V secolo a.C., Pisa: 137–91.Google Scholar
Matthaiou, A. P. (2003), ‘Ἀθηναίοισι τεταγμένοισι ἐν τεμένεϊ Ἡρακλέος’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R., (eds.), Herodotus and his World, Oxford: 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, P. (2006), ‘Der Mann, das Mädchen und der Dichter – zur Frage der Absicht dreier Personen: eine Verführungsgeschichte (Archil. 196a W2)’, Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis 42: 5–20.Google Scholar
Mazzarino, S. (1943), ‘Per la storia di Lesbo nel VI secolo a. C.’, Athenaeum 21: 38–78.Google Scholar
McConnell, T. (2019), Chronology, Dialect and Style: Studies in the Distribution of Linguistic Archaisms in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry, DPhil diss. Oxford.Google Scholar
McDermott, E. A. (1991), ‘Double meaning and mythic novelty in Euripides’ plays’, TAPA 121: 123–32.Google Scholar
Medaglia, S. M. (1977), ‘Archiloco, Orazio e il secondo epodo di Colonia’, QUCC 25: 7–15.Google Scholar
Minton, W. W. (1960), ‘Homer’s invocations of the Muses: traditional patterns’, TAPA 91: 292–309.Google Scholar
Minton, W. W. (1962), ‘Invocation and catalogue in Hesiod and Homer’, TAPA 93: 188–212.Google Scholar
Missiou, A. (2011), Literacy and Democracy in Fifth-Century Athens, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. G. (2009), Greek Vase-Painting and the Origins of Visual Humour, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1978), ‘The historians of the classical world and their audiences: some suggestions’, ASNP 3.8: 59–75.Google Scholar
Mondi, R. (1983), ‘The Homeric Cyclopes: folktale, tradition, and theme’, TAPA 113: 17–38.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. (2009), ‘L’esegesi antica di Eschilo da Aristotele a Didimo’, in Jouanna and Montanari (2009): 379–422.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.) (2015), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montiglio, S. (2011), From Villain to Hero. Odysseus in Ancient Thought, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mordine, M. (2006), ‘Speaking to Kings: Hesiod’s ΑΙΝΟΣ and the Rhetoric of Allusion in the Works and Days’, CQ 56: 363–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. (2015), Pindar and the Construction of Syracusan Monarchy in the Fifth Century B.C., Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2007a), The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2007b), Performances and Audiences in Pindar’s Sicilian Victory Odes, London.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2012), ‘Performance, re-performance and Pindar’s audiences’, in Agócs, Carey, and Rawles (2012): 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2020), Apollonius Rhodius, Herodotus and Historiography, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrone, R. (1976), ‘La scelta di Archiloco. Nota al Pap. Col. 7511 vv. 23–25’, BPEC 24: 27–31.Google Scholar
Most, G. (2012), ‘Poet and public: communicative strategies in Pindar and Bacchylides’, in Agócs, Carey, and Rawles (2012): 249–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. W. (1991), ‘Höhlen mit doppeltem Eingang bei Sophokles und Euripides’, Rheinisches Museum 134: 262–75.Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. (2000), Euripides, Philoktet. Testimonien und Fragmente, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. (1987), ‘Herodotus and oral history’, in Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. and Kuhrt, A. (eds.), Achaemenid History II. The Greek Sources, Leiden: 93–115.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979), The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2010), ‘Ancient Greek elegy’, in Weisman, K. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy, Oxford: 13–45.Google Scholar
Napolitano, M. (2005), ‘Appunti sullo statuto letterario del Ciclope di Euripide’, Dioniso 4: 42–55.Google Scholar
Nelson, S. (1997), ‘The justice of Zeus in Hesiod’s Fable of the Hawk and the Nightingale’, CJ 92: 235–47.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. J. (2021), ‘Repeating the unrepeated: allusions to Homeric hapax legomena in archaic and classical Greek poetry’, in Beck, D. (ed.), Repetition, Communication, and Meaning in the Ancient World, Leiden: 119–57.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. J. (2022), ‘Iphigenia in the Iliad and the architecture of Homeric allusion’, TAPA 152: 55–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. J. (forthcoming), ‘Famous first words: incipit-allusions across time’, in Bing, P., Faulkner, A., and Höschele, R. (eds.), Arts of Allusion: Greek Intertextuality over Time.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2018), ‘The Alexandrian footnote in Lucretius’ De rerum natura’, Mnemosyne 71: 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolai, R. (2012), ‘Erodoto e la tragedia di Troia: a proposito di 2.112–120’, in Bastianini, G., Lapini, W., and Tulli, M. (eds.), Harmonia: scritti di filologia classica in onore di Angelo Casanova, Florence: 633–49.Google Scholar
Nicolosi, A. (2007), Ipponatte, epodi di Strasburgo—Archiloco, epodi di Colonia (con un’appendice su P. Oxy. LXIX 4708). Eikasmos 14, Bologna.Google Scholar
Nieddu, G. F. (2004), La scrittura ‘Madre delle Muse’: agli esordi di un nuovo modello di comunicazione culturale, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Nimis, S. A. (1987), Narrative Semiotics in the Epic Tradition: The Simile, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Nobili, C. (2016), Corone di gloria: epigrammi agonistici ed epinici dal VII al IV secolo a.C., Alessandria.Google Scholar
Novokhatko, A. (2015), ‘Greek scholarship from its beginnings to Alexandria’, in Montanari, Matthaios, and Rengakos (2015): 3–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbink, D. (2001), ‘The genre of Plataea: generic unity in the new Simonides’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbink, D. (2016), ‘The newest Sappho: text, apparatus criticus, and translation’, in Bierl and Lardinois (2016): 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, D. (2013), Drakōn: Dragon Myth and Serpent Cult in the Greek and Roman Worlds, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S. D. (2012), The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite and Related Texts: Text, Translation and Commentary, Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origa, V. (2007), Le contradizzioni della sapienza: sophos e sophia nella tragedia euripidea, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (1984), ‘The myth of propaganda and the propaganda of myth’, Hephaistos 5–6: 62–70.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2010), ‘The art of signing in ancient Greece’, Arethusa 43: 231–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, R. (2014), ‘Intoxication and sociality: the symposium in the ancient Greek world’, in McShane, A. and Withington, P. (ed.), Cultures of Intoxication, Oxford: 34–60.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2018a), ‘Homeric imagery’, in Nevett, L. and Whitley, J., (eds.), An Age of Experiment: Classical Archaeology Transformed 1976–2014, Cambridge: 75–85.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2018b), The Transformation of Athens: Painted Pottery and the Creation of Classical Greece, Princeton.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, P. and Collard, C. (2013), Euripides: Cyclops and Major Fragments of Greek Satyric Drama, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacelli, V. (2016), Teodette di Faselide – Frammenti poetici: introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. (1964), ‘Archilochus and the oral tradition’, in Pouilloux, J. et al. (eds.), Archiloque: sept exposés et discussions, Geneva: 119–79.Google Scholar
Pallantza, E. (2005), Der Troische Krieg in der nachhomerischen Literatur bis zum 5.Jh. v. Chr., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Palomar, N. (2012), ‘El manto nupcial de Zas: Obra y acción cosmogónica’, in Vintró, E., Mestre, F., and Gómez, P. (eds.), Homenatge a Montserrat Jufresa, Barcelona: 251–64.Google Scholar
Papazarkadas, N. (2014), The Epigraphy and History of Boeotia: New Finds, New Prospects, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, H. N. (2009), ‘Books and reading Latin poetry’, in Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, Oxford: 186–230.Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1930), ‘Studies in the epic technique of oral verse-making. I. Homer and Homeric style’, HSCP 41: 73–147.Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1971), The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, ed. Parry, A., Oxford.Google Scholar
Pavel, T. (1975), ‘Possible worlds in literary semantics’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34: 165–76.Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. (2012), ‘Pindar and the reconstruction of the past’, in Marincola, J., Llewellyn-Jones, L., and Maciver, C. (eds.), Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras, Edinburgh: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peek, W. (1985), ‘Ein neues Bruchstück vom Archilochos-Monument des Sosthenes’, ZPE 59: 13–22.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. (2017), ‘The violation of Wackernagel’s Law at Pindar Pythian 3.1’, HSCP 109: 63–82.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2006), ‘Homer and Herodotus’, in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F., and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin, Oxford: 76–104.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2013), ‘Intertextuality, plausibility and interpretation’, Histos 7: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peponi, N. (2016), ‘Sappho and the mythopoetics of the domestic’, in Bierl and Lardinois (2016): 225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petropoulos, J. (1994), Heat and Lust: Hesiod’s Midsummer Festival Scene Revisited, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. (2010), ‘True lies in Athenian public epigrams’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 202–15.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. (2016), ‘Archaic funerary epigram and Hector’s imagined epitymbia’, in Efstathiou, A. and Karamanou, I. (eds.), Homeric Receptions across Generic and Cultural Contexts, Berlin: 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, A., Petrovic, I., and Thomas, E. (eds.) (2019), The Materiality of Text: Placement, Perception and Presence of Inscribed Texts in Classical Antiquity, Leiden.Google Scholar
Pfeijffer, I. L. (2000), ‘Shifting Helen: an interpretation of Sappho, fragment 16 (Voigt)’, CQ 50: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968), History of Classical Scholarship I: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. (2018), ‘Hesiod and Pindar’, in Loney, A. C. and Scully, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hesiod, Oxford: 261–77.Google Scholar
Pirenne-Delforge, V. (1994), L’Aphrodite grecque: contribution à l’étude de ses cultes et de sa personnalité dans le panthéon archaïque et classique, Athens and Liège.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, V. (2011), Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Poltera, O. (1997), Le langage de Simonide: étude sur la tradition poétique et son renouvellement, Bern.Google Scholar
Poltera, O. (2008), Simonides Lyricus: Testimonia und Fragmente: Einleitung, kritische Ausgabe, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Basel.Google Scholar
Powell, B. (1997), ‘From picture to myth: prolegomena to the invention of mythic representation in Greek art’, in Langdon, S. (ed), New Light on a Dark Age: Exploring the culture of Geometric Greece, Columbia: 155–93.Google Scholar
Power, T. (2020), ‘Sappho’s parachoral monody’, in Foster, M., Kurke, L., and Weiss, N. (eds.), Genre in Archaic and Classical Greek Poetry, Leiden: 82–108.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1996), ‘Between narrative and catalogue: life and death of the poem’, Mêtis 11: 5–24.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1998), The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition, New Haven.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (2006), ‘Il testo di Tirteo nel tessuto omerico’, in Roscalla (2006): 21–41.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. C. (2007), ‘Hermes, kouroi and the political anatomy of Athens’, G&R 54: 82–105.Google Scholar
Raab, I. (1972), Zu den Darstellungen des Parisurteils in der griechischen Kunst, Frankfurt and Bern.Google Scholar
Radt, S. L. (1983), ‘Sophokles in seinen Fragmenten’, in de Romilly, J. (ed.), Sophocle, Geneva: 185–231.Google Scholar
Rau, P. (1967), Paratragodia: Untersuchung einer komischen Form des Aristophanes, Munich.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (2008), ‘Simonides fr. 11.14 W: “close-fighting Danaans”’, Mnemosyne 61: 459–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawles, R. (2018), Simonides the Poet: Intertextuality and Reception, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengakos, A. (2002), ‘Narrativität, Intertextualität, Selbstreferentialität: die neue Deutung der Odyssee’, in Reichel, M. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Epea pteroenta: Beiträge zur Homerforschung (Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann zum 75. Geburtstag), Stuttgart: 173–91.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. (2006), ‘Homer and the historians: the influence of epic narrative technique on Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Montanari, F. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), La Poésie épique grecque: metamorphoses d’un genre littéraire, Geneva: 183–209.Google Scholar
Revermann, M. (2006), ‘The competence of theatre audiences in fifth- and fourth-century Athens’, JHS 126: 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1975), ‘Homeric professors in the age of the sophists’, PCPS 201: 65–81.Google Scholar
Risch, E. (1975), ‘Sprachliche Betrachtungen zum neuen Archilochos-Fragment (Pap. Colon. Inv. 7511)’, GB 4: 219–29.Google Scholar
Rissman, L. (1983), Love as War: Homeric Allusions in the Poetry of Sappho, Königstein.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. (1980), Dichter und Gruppe: eine Untersuchung zu den Bedingungen und zur historischen Funktion früher griechischer Lyrik am Beispiel Alcaeus, Munich.Google Scholar
Roscalla, F. (ed.) (2006), L’autore e l’opera: attribuzioni, appropriazioni, apocrifi nella Greca antica, Pisa.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1997), ‘Her master’s voice: Sappho’s dialogue with Homer’, MD 39: 123–49.Google Scholar
Ruffell, I. A. (2002), ‘A total write-off: Aristophanes, Cratinus, and the rhetoric of comic competition’, CQ 52: 138–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruffell, I. A. (2011), Politics and Anti-Realism in Athenian Old Comedy: The Art of the Impossible, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, J. A., Fernandez-Galiano, M., and Heubeck, A. (eds.) (1992), A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey; Volume II: Books XVII–XXIV, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. (2001), Pindar’s Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. (1991–3), ‘From the Iliad to the Odyssey’, BICS 38: 47–54 (= Cairns (2001): 117–46).Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. (2001), ‘The New Simonides: towards a commentary’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. (1980), ‘Fiction, non-factuals, and the principle of minimal departure’, Poetics 9: 402–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. (1991), Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. (2013), ‘Possible worlds’, in Hühn, P. et al. (eds.), The Living Handbook of Narratology, Hamburg. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/possible-worldsGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. and Bell, A. (2019), ‘Introduction: possible worlds theory revisited’, in Bell, A. and Ryan, M.-L (eds.), Possible Worlds Theory and Contemporary Narratology, Lincoln: 1–44.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (2002), ‘Herodotus and tragedy’, in Bakker, de Jong, and van Wees (2002): 117–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammons, B. (2017), Device and Composition in the Greek Epic Cycle, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammons, B. (2019), ‘The space of the epigone in early Greek epic’, YAGE 3: 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, C. M. (2016), ‘A new reconstruction of Sappho 44 (P. OXY. X 1232 + P. OXY. XVII 2076)’, in Derda, T., Łajtar, A., and Urbanik, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of Papyrology. Warsaw, 29 July–3 August 2013, Warsaw: 53–62.Google Scholar
Santamaría, M. A. (2019), ‘Pherecydes of Syros in the papyrological tradition’, in Vassallo, C. (ed.), Presocratics and Papyrological Tradition: A Philosophical Reappraisal of the Sources, Berlin and Boston: 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbardella, L. (2012), Cucitori di canti: studi sulla tradizione epico-rapsodica greca e i suoi itinerari nel VI secolo a.C., Rome.Google Scholar
Sbardella, L. (2014), ‘The Trojan War myth: rhapsodic canon and lyric alternatives’, in Colesanti and Giordano (2014): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharffenberger, E. (1996), ‘Euripidean paracomedy: a reconsideration of the Antiope’, Text and Presentation 17: 65–72.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1966), Myth and Legend in Early Greek Art, tr. A. Hicks, New York and London.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1978), Götter- und Heldensagen der Griechen in der spätarchaischen Kunst, Munich.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1992), Gods and Heroes in Late Archaic Greek Art, tr. A. Griffiths, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. and Bayard, A.-C. (1997), Die Bildnisse der antiken Dichter, Redner und Denker, Basel.Google Scholar
Schein, S. L. (2006), ‘The Iliad and Odyssey in Sophocles’ Philoctetes: generic complexity and ethical ambiguity’, BICS 49: 129–40.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. (2018), The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesier, R. (2013), ‘Atthis, Gyrinno, and other hetairai: female personal names in Sappho’s poetry’, Philologus 157: 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesier, R. (2018), ‘Sappho bei Nacht’, in Chaniotis, A. (ed.), La Nuit: imaginaire et réalités nocturnes dans le monde gréco-romain, Geneva: 91–129.Google Scholar
Schmit-Neuerburg, T. (1999), Vergils Aeneis und die antike Homerexegese, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnapp, A. (1997), Le chasseur et la cité: chasse et érotique dans la Grèce ancienne, Paris.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1996), ‘Self-correction, pseudo-spontaneity, and orality in archaic poetry’, in Worthington, I. (ed.), Voice into Text: Orality and Literacy in Greek Literature, Leiden: 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. (2002), Listening to Homer: Tradition, Narrative, and Audience, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. (2021), ‘Reperformance, writing, and the boundaries of literature’, in Beck, D. (ed.), Repetition, Communication, and Meaning in the Ancient World: Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World 13, Leiden: 236–60.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1993), Oedipus Tyrannus: Tragic Heroism and the Limits of Knowledge, New York.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, B. (1982), Palintonos Harmonia: Studien zu komischen Elementen in der griechischen Tragödie, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidensticker, B. (2005), ‘Dithyramb, comedy, and satyr-play’, in Gregory, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek Tragedy, Malden, MA, Oxford and Carlton: 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, H. A. (1990), ‘Old and new heroes: narrative, composition and subject in Attic black-figure’, Classical Antiquity 9: 114–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, M. (1974), Interaction in Poetic Imagery. With Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, T. (2018), A Commentary on the Fragments of Fourth-Century Tragedy, PhD diss. Nottingham.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (1991), ‘The quiet life in Euripides’ Antiope’, in Hofmann and Harder (1991): 137–51.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (2002), ‘Oral strategies in the language of Herodotus’, in Bakker, de Jong, and van Wees (2002): 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, B. (1946), Die Entdeckung des Geistes, Hamburg (2nd ed. 1948, Hamburg [tr. T. Rosenmeyer (1953) as The Discovery of the Mind, Oxford]; 3rd ed. 1955, Hamburg; 4th ed. 1975, Göttingen).Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. M. (1997), ‘Homer and Greek art’, in Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.), A New Companion to Homer, Leiden: 560–97.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. M. (1998), Homer and the Artists: Text and Picture in Early Greek Art, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2006), ‘Syndeiponoi (The Diners) or Achaiôn Syllogos (The Gathering of the Achaeans)’, in Sommerstein, A. H., Fitzpatrick, D., and Talboy, T. (eds.), Sophocles: Selected Fragmentary Plays. Volume I, Oxford: 84–140.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2010b), ‘“They all knew how it was going to end”: tragedy, myth, and the spectator’, in The Tangled Ways of Zeus And Other Studies In and Around Greek Tragedy, Oxford: 209–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2012), ‘Fragments and lost tragedies’, in Markantonatos, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Sophocles, Leiden and Boston: 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (2015), ‘Tragedy and the Epic Cycle’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015a): 461–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H., Fitzpatrick, D., and Talboy, T. (eds.) (2006), Sophocles: Fragmentary Plays I, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1995), ‘Reading’ Greek Death to the End of the Classical Period, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, H. (2017), ‘Sappho 44: Trojan myth and literary history’, Mnemosyne 70: 740–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, H. (2018a), ‘Event and artefact: the Hymn to Apollo, archaic lyric, and early Greek literary history’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018): 151–71.Google Scholar
Spelman, H. (2019), ‘Schools, reading and poetry in the early Greek world’, CCJ 65: 150–72.Google Scholar
Spelman, H. (2021), ‘Staging literary history in Old Comedy’, Classical Philology 116: 305–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, N. (1995a), ‘Early Lesbos between East and West: a “grey area” of Aegean archaeology’, The Annual of the British School at Athens 90: 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallbaum, J. G. (1825–6), Eustathii Archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis Commentarii ad Homeri Odysseam, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Stamatopolou, Z. (2016), ‘The quarrel with Perses and Hesiod’s biographical tradition’, GRBS 51: 1–17.Google Scholar
Stamatopolou, Z. (2017), Hesiod and Classical Greek Poetry: Reception and Transformation in the Fifth Century BCE, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansbury-O’Donnell, M. D. (1999), Pictorial Narrative in Ancient Greek Art, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (2001), ‘A bard of the iron age and his auxiliary Muse’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001): 106–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, D. (2005), ‘Nautical matters: Hesiod’s Nautilia and Ibycus fragment 282 PMG’, CP 100: 347–55.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. (2007), ‘Feathers flying: avian poetics in Hesiod, Pindar, and Callimachus’, AJP 128: 177–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, D. (2012), ‘Fables and frames: the poetics and politics of animal fables in Hesiod, Archilochus, and the Aesopica’, Arethusa 45: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenger, J. (2004), Poetische Argumentation: Die Funktion der Gnomik in den Epinikien des Bakchylides, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, S. (2002), ‘Commenting on fragments’, in Gibson and Kraus (2002): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinton, T. C. W. (1976), ‘“Si credere dignum est”: some expressions of disbelief in Euripides and others’, PCPS 22, 60–89 [= (1990) 236–64].Google Scholar
Stinton, T. C. W. (1986), ‘The scope and limits of allusion in Greek tragedy’, in Cropp et al (1986): 67–102 [= (1990) 454–92].Google Scholar
Stoessl, F. (1945), ‘Die Phoinissen des Phrynichos und die Perser des Aischylos’, MH 2: 148–65.Google Scholar
Stoneman, R. (1981), ‘Pindar and the mythological tradition’, Philologus 125: 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez de la Torre, E. S. (2008), ‘“Ya vienen los novios”: una lectura socioantropológica del fragmento 44 V. de Safo’, Faventia 30: 143–60.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1993), Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, tr. J. Lloyd, Ithaca.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, L. A. (2010), The Hidden Chorus: Echoes of Genre in Tragic Lyric, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, L. A. (2012), ‘Archilochus the “anti-hero”? Heroism, flight and values in Homer and the New Archilochus Fragment (P.Oxy LXIX 4708)’, JHS 132: 139–55.Google Scholar
Swift, L. A. (2015), ‘Negotiating seduction: Archilochus’ Cologne Epode and the transformation of epic’, Philologus 159: 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, L. A. (2016), ‘Poetics and precedents in Archilochus’ erotic imagery’, in Swift and Carey (2016): 253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, L. A. (2017), ‘Narratorial authority and its subversion in Archilochus’, in Bakker, E. (ed.), Authorship and Greek Song: Authority, Authenticity, and Performance, Leiden: 161–77.Google Scholar
Swift, L. A. (2018), ‘Thinking with brothers in Sappho and beyond’, in Allan, W. and Swift, L. A. (eds.), Moralising Strategies in Early Greek Poetry, Toronto: 71–87.Google Scholar
Swift, L. A. (2019), Archilochus: The Poems: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (1990), ‘The earliest quotation of the Iliad?’, in Craik, E (ed.), Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects for Sir Kenneth Dover, Oxford 1990: 109–12.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (2007), Pots and Plays: Interactions between Tragedy and Greek Vase-Painting of the Fourth Century B.C., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2008), ‘The dramatic setting of the arguments with Callicles, Euripides’ Antiope, and an Athenian anti-intellectual argument’, Antichthon 42: 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tentori Montalto, M. (2017), Essere primi per il valore: gli epigrammi funerary greci su pietra per i caduti in Guerra (VII-V sec. a.C.), Pisa.Google Scholar
Thiel, R. (2011), ‘Ein Staatsfeind als Held? Simonides’ Plataiai-Elegie im politischen Kontext des griechischen Sieges über das Perserreich’, APF 57: 381–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. (1989), Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. (1993), ‘Performance and written publication in Herodotus and the sophistic generation’, in Kullmann, W. and Althoff, J. (eds.), Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur, Tübingen: 225–44.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2000), Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Todisco, L. (ed.) (2003), La ceramica figurate a soggetto tragico in Magna Grecia e in Sicilia, Rome.Google Scholar
Tor, S. (2017), Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology: A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosi, T. (1908), ‘Sul sesto Peana di Pindaro’, Atene e Roma 11: 201–20 [= (1957) 99–114].Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. (2008), The Oral Palimpsest. Exploring Intertextuality in the Homeric Epics, Harvard.Google Scholar
Tsiafakis, D. (2000), ‘The allure and repulsion of Thracians in the art of classical Athens’, in Cohen, B. (ed), Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art, Leiden: 364–89.Google Scholar
Tugendhat, E. (1960), ‘Zum Rechtfertigungsproblem in Pindars 7. nemeischen Gedicht’, Hermes 88: 385–409.Google Scholar
Ucciardello, G. (2012), ‘Frammento epodico (Archiloco?)’, Literarische Texte der Berliner Papyrussammlung 10: 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlig, A. (2018), ‘Sailing and singing: Alcaeus at sea’, in Budelmann and Phillips (2018): 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valk, M. H. A. L. H. van der (1971–87), Eustathii Archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem Pertinentes, 4 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1969), ‘Tyrtaeus 6–7 D: a commentary’, Mnemosyne 22: 337–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrall, A. W. (1908), ‘The part of Phrynichus in the Persae of Aeschylus’, PCPS 79: 1–13.Google Scholar
Vestrheim, G. (2010), ‘Voice in sepulchral epigrams’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 61–78.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. J. (1995), ‘Heracles Lacedaemonius: the political dimensions of Sophocles Trachiniae and Euripides Heracles’, Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 21: 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vignolo Munson, R. (2001), Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus, Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vögler, A. (1967), Vergleichende Studien zur sophokleischen und euripideischen Elektra, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wachter, R. (2010), ‘The origin of epigrams on “speaking objects”’, in Baumbach, Petrovic, and Petrovic (2010b): 250–60.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. (2009), Distorted Ideals in Greek Vase-Painting: The World of Mythological Burlesque, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1992), ‘Le dragon hittite Illuyankas et le géant Typhôeus’, CRAI 136: 319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, C. (1995), How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Węcowski, M. (2009), ‘Hippias of Elis (6)’, in Worthington, I. (ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby, https://scholarlyeditions.brill.com/bnjo/.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1992), Iambi et Elegi Graeci ante Alexandrum cantati. Volumen II, 2nd ed., Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1999), ‘The invention of Homer’, CQ 49: 364–82 [= (2011–13) i.408–36].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. (2001b), Studies in the Text and Transmission of the Iliad, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. (2002), ‘The view from Lesbos’, in M. Reichel and A. Rengakos (eds.), Epea pteroenta: Beiträge zur Homerforschung (Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann zum 75. Geburtstag), Stuttgart: 207–19 [= (2011–13) i.392–407].Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2011a), ‘Echoes of Hesiod and elegy in the Iliad’, in West (2011–13): I.209–32.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2011c), ‘Pindar as a man of letters’, in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R. B. (eds.), Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons, Oxford: 50–68 [= (2011–13) ii.129–50].Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2011–13), Hellenica: Selected Papers on Greek Literature and Thought, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2012), ‘Towards a chronology of early Greek epic’, in Andersen and Haug (2012): 224–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. L. (2013), The Epic Cycle: A Commentary on the Lost Troy Epics, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. (2002), Ransom, Revenge, and Heroic Identity in the Iliad, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, S. (1974), ‘More light on old walls: the Theseus of the Centauromachy in the Theseion’, JHS 94: 158–65.Google Scholar
Woodford, S. (1982), ‘Ajax and Achilles playing a game on an olpe in Oxford’, JHS 102: 173–85.Google Scholar
Wright, M. E. (2013), ‘Comedy versus tragedy in Wasps’, in Bakola, Prauscello, and Telò (2013): 205–25.Google Scholar
Wright, M. E. (2016a), ‘Euripidean tragedy and quotation culture: the case of Stheneboea F661’, AJP 137: 601–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M. E. (2016b), The Lost Plays of Greek Tragedy, Volume I: Neglected Authors, London.Google Scholar
Wright, M. E. (2019), The Lost Plays of Greek Tragedy, II: Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.) (2003), Written Texts and the Rise of Literature Culture in Ancient Greece, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1980), ‘The closet of masks: role-playing and myth-making in the Orestes of Euripides’, Ramus 9: 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhmud, L. (2006), The Origin of the History of Science in Classical Antiquity, tr. A. Chernoglazov, Berlin.Google Scholar