Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part one The development of theory
- 1 Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view
- 2 Artefacts as products of human categorisation processes
- 3 Social formation, social structures and social change
- 4 Epistemological issues raised by a structuralist archaeology
- Part two The search for models
- Part three Application: the analysis of archaeological materials
- Part four Commentary
- Index
3 - Social formation, social structures and social change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part one The development of theory
- 1 Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view
- 2 Artefacts as products of human categorisation processes
- 3 Social formation, social structures and social change
- 4 Epistemological issues raised by a structuralist archaeology
- Part two The search for models
- Part three Application: the analysis of archaeological materials
- Part four Commentary
- Index
Summary
In this chapter Tilley outlines aspects of a general social theory which has implications for all archaeological processes – the use and deposition of material culture and its analysis and interpretation. The concern is to situate archaeology securely within the social sciences to which it can contribute positively as a discipline defined by a distinctive body of information.
According to the theory presented, societies have a dual nature. They consist of individual people, but also of social structures. Individual acts are orientated according to principles or rules which in turn are reproduced by the actions. Man makes himself within a particular spatial and historical context in which he ‘knows how’ to act, even if he is unaware of all the structuring principles employed. Action has consequences (intended and unintended) which form the social structure.
Material culture has a central role in the relationship between the individual and the social structure. Material items are structured according to principles or rules, but they also structure further individual actions as part of a particular ideological framework. Finally, the nature and causes of social change are considered and emphasis is placed on contradictions between the interests and orientations of individuals and groups within society.
Introduction
The position put forward here for an understanding of the nature of social formations and of changes within them is defined as dialectical structuralism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Symbolic and Structural Archaeology , pp. 26 - 38Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1982
- 17
- Cited by