Book contents
- Stateness and Democracy in East Asia
- Stateness and Democracy in East Asia
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: Rethinking Stateness and Democracy in East Asia
- 2 State-Building and Democratization
- 3 South Korea’s Democracy and the Legacies of the Developmental State
- 4 After Hegemony: State Capacity, the Quality of Democracy and the Legacies of the Party-State in Democratic Taiwan
- 5 Democratization Interrupted: The Parallel State and the Demise of Democracy in Thailand
- 6 Weak State and the Limits of Democratization in Cambodia, 1993–2017
- 7 The Institutional Roots of Defective Democracy in the Philippines
- 8 Stateness and State Capacity in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: Securing Democracy’s Survival, Entrenching Its Low Quality
- 9 As Good as It Gets? Stateness and Democracy in East Timor
- 10 Stateness and Democracy: Evidence from East Asia and Cross-Regional Comparisons
- Index
- References
2 - State-Building and Democratization
The Sequencing Debate and Evidence from East Asia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 May 2020
By
Book contents
- Stateness and Democracy in East Asia
- Stateness and Democracy in East Asia
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: Rethinking Stateness and Democracy in East Asia
- 2 State-Building and Democratization
- 3 South Korea’s Democracy and the Legacies of the Developmental State
- 4 After Hegemony: State Capacity, the Quality of Democracy and the Legacies of the Party-State in Democratic Taiwan
- 5 Democratization Interrupted: The Parallel State and the Demise of Democracy in Thailand
- 6 Weak State and the Limits of Democratization in Cambodia, 1993–2017
- 7 The Institutional Roots of Defective Democracy in the Philippines
- 8 Stateness and State Capacity in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: Securing Democracy’s Survival, Entrenching Its Low Quality
- 9 As Good as It Gets? Stateness and Democracy in East Timor
- 10 Stateness and Democracy: Evidence from East Asia and Cross-Regional Comparisons
- Index
- References
Summary
Should a well-functioning state be a precondition for democratization? Can democratization nevertheless contribute to state-building? What does the evidence from East Asia say about the so-called “sequencing debate”? This chapter first reviews the debate on the relationship between state-building and democratization, then examines the historical relationship between state-building and democratization in East Asia. The main findings are as follows. First, privileging state-building has both good and bad consequences and does not preclude the possibility of democratization. Second, democratization confers international legitimacy on isolated states and is beneficial as a conflict-solving mechanism, yet often requires costly external intervention and is not guaranteed success. Finally, the historical experience of East Asia up to the present suggests that today’s regimes cannot freely choose between state-building and democratization
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Stateness and Democracy in East Asia , pp. 25 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abinales, P. (2015). Aquino’s Mixed Presidential Legacy. East Asia Forum. Available at: www.eastasiaforum.org/2015/12/30/aquinos-mixed-presidential-legacy/ [Accessed 22 June 2019].Google Scholar
Andaya, B. W., and Andaya, L. (1982). A History of Malaysia. London: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Aspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change in Indonesia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Aspinall, E., et al. (2018). Timor-Leste Votes: Parties and Patronage. Journal of Democracy, 29(1), 153–67.Google Scholar
Bates, R. (2008). When Things Fell Apart: State Failure in Late-Century Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1997). Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bergere, M. C. (1968). The Role of the Bourgeoisie. In Wright, M. C., ed., China in Revolution: The First Phase, 1900–1913. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bertrand, J. (1998). Growth and Democracy in Southeast Asia. Comparative Politics, 30(3), 355–75.Google Scholar
Bitar, S., and Lowenthal, A. F., eds. (2015). Democratic Transitions: Conversations with World Leaders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M., and Chang, E. (2006). State Building and Democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa: Forwards, Backwards or Together? Comparative Political Studies, 39(9), 1059–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, M. (2003). Making Enemies: War and State Building in Burma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. C. (1989). Democracy and Bureaucracy in Japan. In Ishida, T. and Krauss, E., eds., Democracy in Japan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 113–38.Google Scholar
Carbone, G., and Memoli, V. (2015). Does Democratization Foster State Consolidation? Democratic Rule, Political Order, and Administrative Capacity. Governance, 28(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, L., and Myers, R. (1998). The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, M. (2009). A History of Modern Burma. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Y. H., and Lin, J. W. (2001). Political Development in 20th-Century Taiwan: State building, Regime Transformation and the Construction of National Identity. In Edmonds, R. L. and Goldstein, S., eds., Taiwan in the Twentieth Century: A Retrospective View. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–29.Google Scholar
Croissant, A. (2004). From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping Asian Democratization. Democratization, 11(5), 156–78.Google Scholar
Croissant, A., and Lorentz, P. (2018). Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia: An Introduction to Governments and Political Regimes. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Fincher, J. (1968). Political Provincialism and the National Revolution. In Wright, M. C., ed., China in Revolution: The First Phase, 1900–1913. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 185–226.Google Scholar
Garon, S. (2000). State and Society in Interwar Japan. In Goldman, M. and Gordon, A., eds., Historical Perspectives on Contemporary East Asia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 155–82.Google Scholar
Gernet, J. (1982). A History of Chinese Civilization, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. (2000). Society and Politics from Transwar through Postwar Japan. In Goldman, M. and Gordon, A., eds., Historical Perspectives on Contemporary East Asia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 272–96.Google Scholar
Hsiao, H. H. M. (1992). The Rise of Social Movements and Civil Protests. In Cheng, T. J. and Haggard, S., eds., Political Change in Taiwan. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P. (2000). Colonial Masters, National Politicos and Provincial Lords: Central Authority and Local Autonomy in the American Philippines. Journal of Asian Studies, 59(2), 277–306.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, P., and Rocamora, J. (2011). Patronage-Based Parties and the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines: Origins, Evolution, and the Imperatives of Reform. In Robison, R., ed., Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1987). Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Government-Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. In Deyo, F., ed., The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 136–64.Google Scholar
Kasetsiri, C. (1976). The Rise of Ayudhya: A History of Siam in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, S. J. (1971). The Politics of Military Revolution in Korea. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, W. (1990). The Burmese Polity, 1752–1819: Politics, Administration, and Social Organization in the Early Kon-baung Period. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Krauss, E., and Ishida, T. (1989). Japanese Democracy in Perspective. In Ishida, T. and Krauss, E., eds., Democracy in Japan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 327–42.Google Scholar
Lee, N. (2007). The Making of Minjung: Democracy and the Politics of Representation in South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, V. (2003). Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1850. Volume 1. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J., and Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzuca, S., and Munck, G. (2014). State or Democracy First? Alternative Perspectives on the State-Democracy Nexus. Democratization, 21(7), 1221–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, J. (2014). Democracy First or State First? A Historical Perspective on the Sequencing Debate. APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper. SSRN. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2451896 [Accessed 22 June 2019].Google Scholar
Ongkili, J. (1985). Nation-Building in Malaysia, 1946–1974. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasuk, P., and Baker, C. (2002). Thailand: Economy and Politics, 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pei, M. (2008). China’s Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, A. (1993). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680. Volume 2. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rodan, G. (2011). Consultative Authoritarianism and Regime Change Analysis: Implications of the Singapore Case. In Robison, R., ed., Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politic. New York: Routledge, pp. 120–34.Google Scholar
Rustow, D. (1970). Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–63.Google Scholar
Slater, D. (2003). Iron Cage in an Iron Fist: Authoritarian Institutions and the Personalization of Power in Malaysia. Comparative Politics, 36(1), 81–101.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. (2000). From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Steinberg, D. J. (2000). The Philippines: A Singular and Plural Place, 4th ed. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Terwiel, B. J. (2005). Thailand’s Political History: From the Fall of Ayutthaya to Recent Times. Bangkok: River Books.Google Scholar
Van Creveld, M. (1999). The Rise and Decline of the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vu, T. (2010). Paths to Development in Asia: South Korea, Vietnam, China, and Indonesia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vu, T. (2015). The Making and Unmaking of the Communist Party and Single-Party System of Vietnam. In Hicken, A. and Kuhonta, E., eds., Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–61.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, A. (2013). Waves of War: Nationalism, State-Formation, and Ethnic Exclusion in the Modern World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wurfel, D. (1988). Filipino Politics: Development and Decay. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zakaria, F. (2003). The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by