Book contents
- Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in International Investment Law
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in International Investment Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties
- Abbreviations and Acronyms
- Introduction: International Investment Law’s Narrative and Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss
- 1 Shareholders in International Investment Law
- 2 International Investment Law’s Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss: A Clash of Policies
- 3 Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in Domestic Regimes, Customary International Law of Diplomatic Protection, and Human Rights Law
- 4 International Investment Law on the Standing of Shareholders
- 5 Legal Uncertainty and Inconsistency Militating against Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss: The Unpredictability of Investment Disputes Involving Shareholders
- 6 Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss and the Dangers of Parallel Proceedings
- 7 International Res Judicata as a Solution to Parallel Proceedings Arising from Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in International Investment Law
- 8 The Consolidation of Proceedings and Mass Claims in International Investment Law and Arbitration
- 9 Calculating Damages in Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Introduction: International Investment Law’s Narrative and Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2020
- Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in International Investment Law
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in International Investment Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties
- Abbreviations and Acronyms
- Introduction: International Investment Law’s Narrative and Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss
- 1 Shareholders in International Investment Law
- 2 International Investment Law’s Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss: A Clash of Policies
- 3 Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in Domestic Regimes, Customary International Law of Diplomatic Protection, and Human Rights Law
- 4 International Investment Law on the Standing of Shareholders
- 5 Legal Uncertainty and Inconsistency Militating against Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss: The Unpredictability of Investment Disputes Involving Shareholders
- 6 Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss and the Dangers of Parallel Proceedings
- 7 International Res Judicata as a Solution to Parallel Proceedings Arising from Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss in International Investment Law
- 8 The Consolidation of Proceedings and Mass Claims in International Investment Law and Arbitration
- 9 Calculating Damages in Shareholders’ Claims for Reflective Loss
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
International investment law is a small part of the international economic law normative universe and whose distinctive characteristics form its constitutive legitimacy. Robert M. Cover once wrote in his famous “Nomos and Narrative” that “[n]o set of legal institutions or prescriptions exists apart from the narratives that locate it and give it meaning.” Norms cannot be understood if taken out of their context, their narrative. International investment law norms are a good example: international investment law norms are created in a specific context characterized by highly particularized features that are, arguably, found nowhere else. Taking an investment norm outside of its context would strip away its constitutive legitimacy and render it inapplicable and obsolete in another context and another narrative. In other words, for one to fully grasp the meaning of an international investment norm or practice, one has to understand the context in which it is generated and applied.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020