Book contents
- Frontmatter
- CONTENTS
- ILLUSTRATIONS
- The Commercial Bard: Business Models for the Twenty-First Century
- International Innovation? Shakespeare as Intercultural Catalyst
- Brand Shakespeare?
- Global Shakespeare 2.0 and the Task of the Performance Archive
- An International Database of Shakespeare on Film, Television and Radio
- ‘Sounds and Sweet Airs’: Music in Shakespearian Performance History
- Using Shakespeare with Memes, Remixes and Fanfic
- ‘Pretty Much how the Internet Works’; or, Aiding and Abetting the Deprofessionalization of Shakespeare Studies
- Catalysing What? Historical Remediation, the Musical, and What of Love's Labour's Lasts
- Kabuki Twelfth Night and Kyogen Richard III: Shakespeare as a Cultural Catalyst
- The Sonnets as an Open-Source Initiative
- ‘A Stage of the Mind’: Hamlet on Post-War British Radio
- Post-Textual Shakespeare
- I am What I am Not: Identifying with the Other in Othello
- Desdemona's Book, Lost and Found
- Non-Catalyst and Marginal Shakespeares in the Nineteenth-Century Revival of Catalan-Speaking Cultures
- Shakespeare, Mácha and Czech Romantic Historicism
- An Irish Catalysis: W. B. Yeats and the Uses of Shakespeare
- François-Victor Hugo and the Limits of Cultural Catalysis
- ‘You Taught me Language’: Shakespeare in India
- There is Some Soul of Good: An Action-Centred Approach to Teaching Shakespeare in Schools
- The Royal Shakespeare Company as ‘Cultural Chemist’
- Shakespeare at the White Greyhound
- Dark Matter: Shakespeare’s Foul Dens and Forests
- What We Hear; What we see: Theatre for a New Audience's 2009 Hamlet
- Narrative of Negativity: Whig Historiography and the Spectre of King James in Measure for Measure
- Québécois Shakespeare goes Global: Robert Lepage's Coriolan
- Endless Mornings on Endless Faces: Shakespeare and Philip Larkin
- Shakespeare Performances in England 2010
- Professional Shakespeare Productions in the British Isles, January–December 2009
- The Year’s Contribution to Shakespeare Studies
- INDEX
- References
International Innovation? Shakespeare as Intercultural Catalyst
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2011
- Frontmatter
- CONTENTS
- ILLUSTRATIONS
- The Commercial Bard: Business Models for the Twenty-First Century
- International Innovation? Shakespeare as Intercultural Catalyst
- Brand Shakespeare?
- Global Shakespeare 2.0 and the Task of the Performance Archive
- An International Database of Shakespeare on Film, Television and Radio
- ‘Sounds and Sweet Airs’: Music in Shakespearian Performance History
- Using Shakespeare with Memes, Remixes and Fanfic
- ‘Pretty Much how the Internet Works’; or, Aiding and Abetting the Deprofessionalization of Shakespeare Studies
- Catalysing What? Historical Remediation, the Musical, and What of Love's Labour's Lasts
- Kabuki Twelfth Night and Kyogen Richard III: Shakespeare as a Cultural Catalyst
- The Sonnets as an Open-Source Initiative
- ‘A Stage of the Mind’: Hamlet on Post-War British Radio
- Post-Textual Shakespeare
- I am What I am Not: Identifying with the Other in Othello
- Desdemona's Book, Lost and Found
- Non-Catalyst and Marginal Shakespeares in the Nineteenth-Century Revival of Catalan-Speaking Cultures
- Shakespeare, Mácha and Czech Romantic Historicism
- An Irish Catalysis: W. B. Yeats and the Uses of Shakespeare
- François-Victor Hugo and the Limits of Cultural Catalysis
- ‘You Taught me Language’: Shakespeare in India
- There is Some Soul of Good: An Action-Centred Approach to Teaching Shakespeare in Schools
- The Royal Shakespeare Company as ‘Cultural Chemist’
- Shakespeare at the White Greyhound
- Dark Matter: Shakespeare’s Foul Dens and Forests
- What We Hear; What we see: Theatre for a New Audience's 2009 Hamlet
- Narrative of Negativity: Whig Historiography and the Spectre of King James in Measure for Measure
- Québécois Shakespeare goes Global: Robert Lepage's Coriolan
- Endless Mornings on Endless Faces: Shakespeare and Philip Larkin
- Shakespeare Performances in England 2010
- Professional Shakespeare Productions in the British Isles, January–December 2009
- The Year’s Contribution to Shakespeare Studies
- INDEX
- References
Summary
English publicly funded theatre in the twenty-first century, in which Shakespeare plays a considerable role, is becoming increasingly focused on the processes and products of innovation. The term ‘innovation’ has developed into something of a buzzword amongst cultural economists, policymakers and practitioners. Yet, notwithstanding the proliferation of cultural policy and think-tank documents discussing its merits, it is not always clear what form such innovation should take or even what constitutes innovation in the first place. In aesthetic terms innovation is not the same as ‘novelty for its own sake’. Instead, as defined by the OED, it is ‘the alteration of what is established by the introduction of new elements or forms’. Idealized cultural innovation within publicly funded theatre thus operates as an alteration of established modes of production and the subsequent reinvigoration of resulting products. This understanding of innovation – as opposed to the alternative ‘introduction of novelties’ – is what permeates the policy work of John Holden (researcher for think-tank Demos), Brian McMaster (former artistic director of the Edinburgh Festival) and Arts Council England (the arms-length funding body for the arts). The process of innovation is assumed to be radical and risky, but, most importantly, value-generative. It is thus part of an idealized process of production which ensures both aesthetic excellence and cultural value creation.
Cultural economists remind us that innovation is not the same thing as variety or diversity of work. If a theatre simply produces a multitude of plays by different playwrights they are not necessarily innovating. However, if the Royal Shakespeare Company only produces plays by Shakespeare but constantly reworks and redevelops the form and presentation of those plays it has the potential to be innovative. Innovation can thus occur within the performance of an established cultural product:
Few fans at a Rolling Stones concert want to see the Stones take an entirely new musical direction; most come to hear old favourites and relive youthful memories… At the same time, the production technology and skill required to reproduce a simulacrum of a recorded disc in a live setting – or the character of earlier performances – is considerable, and may be regarded as innovative.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 13 - 24Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
- 1
- Cited by