Book contents
- Shakespeare and Beckett
- Shakespeare and Beckett
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Shakespeare and Beckett on the Edges
- Chapter 2 Molecular Shakespeare – Beckett Reading Shakespeare through Joyce
- Chapter 3 ‘Some remains’: Beckettian and Shakespearean Echoes
- Chapter 4 Purgatory and Pause – Shakespeare, Dante and the Lobster
- Chapter 5 ‘[It is] winter/Without journey’ – Still Lifes in Beckett and Shakespeare
- Chapter 6 Endgames
- Chapter 7 Theatres of Sleep
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2023
Book contents
- Shakespeare and Beckett
- Shakespeare and Beckett
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Shakespeare and Beckett on the Edges
- Chapter 2 Molecular Shakespeare – Beckett Reading Shakespeare through Joyce
- Chapter 3 ‘Some remains’: Beckettian and Shakespearean Echoes
- Chapter 4 Purgatory and Pause – Shakespeare, Dante and the Lobster
- Chapter 5 ‘[It is] winter/Without journey’ – Still Lifes in Beckett and Shakespeare
- Chapter 6 Endgames
- Chapter 7 Theatres of Sleep
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare and Beckett , pp. 216 - 235Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Primary Sources
Augustinus, Aurelius. Confessiones Libri XIII. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina XXVI. Turnhout: Brepols, 1981.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. La Commedia Secondo L’Antica Vulgata, 4 vols., ed. Petrocchi, Giorgio. Florence: Casa Ed. Le Lettere, 1994 [1966–1967].Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. The Divine Comedy Being the Vision of Dante Alighieri, transl. Francis Cary, Henry. Oxford University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. The Divine Comedy, transl. C.H: Sisson. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Beckett Digital Manuscript Project. ed. Dirk van, Hulle, Nixon, Mark and Neyt, Vincent, (student library ed.) Bãlã, Veronica. Centre for Manuscript Genetics University of Antwerp: beckettarchive.org.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Company. Ill Seen Ill Said. Worstward Ho. Stirrings Still, ed. van Hulle, Dirk. London: Faber & Faber, 2009.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. The Complete Shorter Prose 1929–1989, ed. Gontarski, S.E.. New York: Grove, 1995.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment. London: John Calder, 1983.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Dream of Fair to Middling Women, ed. O’Brien, Eoin and Fournier, Edith. New York: Arcade, 1992.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Endspiel. Fin de Partie. Endgame, transl. Tophoven, Elmar, 16th ed. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2013.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Film: Complete Scenario, Illustrations, Production Shots. New York: Grove Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. How It Is, ed. O’Reilly, Édouard Magessa. London: Faber & Faber, 2009.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable. London, New York: John Calder, 1994.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. More Pricks than Kicks, ed. Nelson, Cassandra. London: Faber & Faber, 2010.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. Samuel Beckett’s German Diaries 1936–1937, ed. Nixon, Mark. New York: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. The Letters of Samuel Beckett, 4 vols., ed. Fehsenfeld, Martha Dow et al. Cambridge University Press, 2009–2016.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Volume II, Endgame, ed. Gontarski, S.E.. London: Faber & Faber, 1992.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel. ‘Commentaries: Denis Devlin’. transition, 27 (April–May 1938), 289–94.Google Scholar
Book of Common Prayer, The. The Texts of 1549, 1559, and 1662, ed. Cummings, Brian. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis. Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar
Burton, Robert. The Anatomy of Melancholy, ed. Dell, Floy and Jordan-Smith, Paul. New York: Tudor, 1931.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. ‘The Legend of Good Women’ in Benson, Larry (ed.), The Riverside Chaucer, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. 587–630.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. ‘The Book of the Duchess’ in Benson, Larry (ed.), The Riverside Chaucer, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. 329–46.Google Scholar
Chaucer, Geoffrey. ‘The Book of the Duchess’ in Benson, Larry ‘The Knight’s Tale’ in Benson, Larry (ed.), The Riverside Chaucer, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. 37–66.Google Scholar
Cogan, Thomas. The Haven of Health. Chiefly Gathered for the Comfort of Students and Consequences of All Those that Have a Care of Their Health, Amplified upon Five Words of Hippocrates. London: Anne Griffin, 1636.Google Scholar
Denzinger, Heinrich. Enchiridion Symbolorum et Deinitionum, que de Rebus Fidei et Morum A Conciliis Oecomenicis et summis Pontificibus emanarunt, 7th ed. Würzburg, 1895.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. ‘Hamlet and his Problems’, in The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. London: Faber & Faber, 1920. 95–104.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. Selected Prose of T.S. Eliot, ed. and intr. by Kermode, Frank. London: Faber & Faber, 1975.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S. ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’, in The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. London: Faber & Faber, 1920. 47–59.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Prometheus, in Goethes Werke. Hamburger Ausgabe. 14 vols. ed. Trunz, Erich. Hamburg: Wegener, 1948. 176–81.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. ‘Shakespear und kein Ende!’, in Sämtliche Werke nach Epochen seines Schaffens. ed. Richter, Karl et al., vol. XI.ii, ed. John, Johannes et al. Munich: Hanser, 1998. 173–86.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre, in Sämtliche Werke nach Epochen seines Schaffens. ed. Richter, Karl et al., vol. V, ed. Schings, Hans-Jürgen. Munich: Hanser, 2006.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. ‘Zwischen beiden Welten’, in Ästhetische Schriften: 1816-1820. Über Kunst und Altertum I-II. ed. Birus, Hendrik. Frankfurt a. M.: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
von Straßburg, Gottfried.Gottfried’s von Straßburg Tristan, ed. Bechstein, Reinhold. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus, 1893.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. Peter Hall’s Diaries: The Story of a Dramatic Battle, ed. Goodwin, John. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1983.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. ‘Shakespear’ in Blinn, Hansjürgen (ed.), Shakespeare-Rezeption. Die Diskussion um Shakespeare in Deutschland 1. Ausgewählte Texte von 1741-1788. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 1982. 104–19.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Von Deutscher Art und Kunst. Einige fliegende Blätter. Hamburg: Bode, 1773.Google Scholar
Holinshed, Raphael. Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland, vol. IV. London: J. Johnson et al., 1807–1808.Google Scholar
King James VI of Scotland and I of England. Daemonologie in Forme of a Dialogue, Diuided into Three Books. Written by the High and Mightie Prince Iames by the Grace of God King of England, Scotland, France, and Ireland, Defender of the faith. & c. London: William Cotton and Will Aspley, 1603.Google Scholar
Jolas, Eugène. ‘The Revolution of Language and James Joyce’. transition, 11 (February 1928), 109–16.Google Scholar
Joyce, James. Occasional, Critical and Political Writings, ed. Barry, Kevin. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Joyce, James. The James Joyce Archive, 63 vols., ed. Groden, Michael, Gabler, Hans Walter, Litz, Walton and Rose, Danis. New York: Garland, 1977–1979.Google Scholar
Joyce, James. The Letters of James Joyce, ed. Gilbert, Stuart, vol. I. London: Faber & Faber, 1957.Google Scholar
Keats, John. Selected Letters of John Keats, ed. Scott, Grant F. rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Marvell, Andrew. ‘On a Drop of Dew’ in Smith, Nigel (ed.). The Poems of Andrew Marvell. London: Longman, 2003, 39–42.Google Scholar
McGreevy, Thomas. ‘A Note on Work in Progress’. transition, 12 (September 1928), 216–19.Google Scholar
Schubert, Franz. Franz Schubert: Neue Ausgabe sämtlicher Werke, ed. Schubert-Gesellschaft, Internationale, comp. by Dürr, Walter. Kassel, Basel, Tours, London: Bärenreiter, 1979, vol. IVa [Lieder].Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. A Midsummer Night’s Dream, ed. Foakes, R.A.. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Antony and Cleopatra, ed. Bevington, David. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. As You Like It, ed. Hattaway, Michael. Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Cymbeline, ed. Butler, Martin. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, ed. Edwards, Philip. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. King Henry V, ed. Gurr, Andrew. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. King Richard II, ed. Gurr, Andrew. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. King Richard III, ed. Lull, Janis. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Macbeth, ed. Braunmuller, A.R. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Macbeth, ed. Verity, A.W., M.A. Cambridge University Press, 1922.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Measure for Measure, ed. Gibbons, Brian. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Merchant of Venice, ed. Mahood, M.M.. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Romeo and Juliet, ed. Blakemore Evans, G.. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Sonnets, ed. Evans, G. Blakemore. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tempest, ed. Lindley, David. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of King Lear, ed. Halio, Jay L. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Winter’s Tale, ed. Snyder, Susan and Curren-Aquino., Deborah T Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Timon of Athens, ed. Klein, Karl. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Troilus and Cressida, ed. Dawson, Anthony B.. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Twelfth Night, or What You Will, ed. Donno, Elizabeth Story, intr. Gay, Penny. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. ‘An Apology for Poetry’ in Gregory, G. (ed.), Elizabethan Critical Essays I. Oxford University Press, 1971. 148–207.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. Miscellaneous Prose of Sir Philip Sidney, ed. Duncan-Jones, Katherine and Dorsten, Jan van. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Vogelweide, Walter von der. Leich, Lieder, Sangsprüche, ed. Lachmann, Karl, rev. Bein, Thomas, 15th ed. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. The Diary of Virginia Woolf V, ed. Olivier Bell, Anne and McNeillie, Andrew. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. To the Lighthouse. New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1989.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. ‘Craftsmanship’ in The Death of the Moth and Other Essays. London: The Hogarth Press, 1942. 126–32.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Abbott, Porter H. Beckett Writing Beckett: The Author in the Autograph. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Abbott, Porter H. ‘Beginning Again: The Post-Narrative Art of Texts for Nothing and How It Is’ in Pilling, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Beckett. Cambridge University Press, 1994. 106–23.Google Scholar
Ackerley, Chris J. Demented Particulars: The Annotated Murphy. Edinburgh University Press [Journal of Beckett Studies Books], 2010 [2004].Google Scholar
Ackerley, Chris J. ‘The Uncertainty of Self: Samuel Beckett and the Location of Voice’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 14 (2004), 39–51.Google Scholar
Ackerley, Chris J. and Gontarski, S.E. (eds.). The Grove Companion to Beckett. New York: Grove, 2004.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Alan. Seeing Things: From Shakespeare to Pixar. University of Toronto Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Adler, Tony. ‘Waiting for Hamlet: Tom Stoppard’s Early, Beckettian Play at Writers’ Theatre’. Chicago Reader, 5 November 2009.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. ‘Trying to Understand Endgame’ in Bloom, Harold (ed.), Modern Critical Interpretations: Samuel Beckett’s Endgame. New York: Chelsea House, 1988. 9–40.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. ‘Versuch, das Endspiel zu verstehen’ in Adorno, Theodor, Versuch, das Endspiel zu verstehen. Aufsätze zur Literatur des 20. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1973. 167–214.Google Scholar
Albright, Daniel. Representation and the Imagination: Beckett, Kafka, Nabokov, and Schoenberg. University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Alekhine, Alexander. My Best Games of Chess 1924–1937. London: G. Bell and Sons, 1949 [1939].Google Scholar
Alsop, Derek. ‘Playing on: Chess and its Metaphors in the Life and Work of Samuel Beckett’. Critical Quarterly, 54 (2012), 26–40.Google Scholar
Althaus, Peter. ‘Luthers Gedanken über die Letzten Dinge’. Luther Jahrbuch, 23 (1941), 9–34.Google Scholar
Anderton, Joseph. Beckett’s Creatures: Art of Failure After the Holocaust. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
Anderton, Joseph. ‘“Living Flesh”: The Human–Nonhuman Proximity in Beckett’s Four Stories’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 32 (2020), 192–206.Google Scholar
Anspaugh, Kelly. ‘“Faith, Hope and – What is it?”: Beckett Reading Joyce Reading Dante’. Journal of Beckett Studies, (n.s.) 5.1 & 2 (1995/1996), 19–38.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain. On Beckett, ed. Power, Nina and Toscano, Alberto. Manchester: Clinamen, 2003.Google Scholar
Barale, Michèle Aina and Rabinovitz, Rubin. A KWIC Concordance to Samuel Beckett’s Murphy. New York, London: Garland, 1990.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. ‘The Death of the Author’ in Barthes, Roland (ed.), Image – Music – Text, selected and trans. by Heath, Stephen. London: Fontana Press, 1982. 142–8.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Roland Barthes, trans. by Howard, Richard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.Google Scholar
Barone, Rosangela. ‘On the Route of a Walking Shadow: Samuel Beckett’s Come and Go’. Études Irlandaises: Revue Française d’Histoire, Civilisation et Litterature de l’Irelande, 10 (1985), 117–28.Google Scholar
Barton, Anne. ‘Shakespeare and the Limits of Language’. Shakespeare Survey, 24 (1971), 19–30.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. ‘Shakespeare’s Islands’ in Clayton, Tom, Brock, Susan and Forés, Vicente (eds.), Shakespeare and the Mediterranean. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2004. 289–308.Google Scholar
Bates, Julie. Samuel Beckett and the Art of Salvage. Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Begam, Richard. Samuel Beckett and the End of Modernity. Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Benn, Tony. Years of Hope: Diaries, Paper and Letters 1940–1962, ed. Winstone, Ruth. London: Hutchinson, 1994.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. ‘Central Park’, Selected Writings, vol. IV [1938–1940], ed. Eiland, Howard and Jennings, Michael W.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2003. 161–99.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. The Arcades Project, ed. Tiedemann, Rolf, trans. Eiland, Howard and McLaughlin, Kevin. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ben-Zvi, Linda. ‘Samuel Beckett, Fritz Mautner, and the Limits of Language’. PMLA, 95.2 (1980), 183–200.Google Scholar
Ben-Zvi, Linda. Women in Beckett: Performance and Critical Perspectives. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Berlin, Normand. ‘Beyond Beckett = Before Beckett’ in Stewart, Bruce (ed.), Beckett and Beyond. Gerrards Cross, England: Smythe, 1999. 16–22.Google Scholar
Berlin, Normand. ‘Traffic of Our Stage: Why Waiting for Godot?’. Massachusetts Review, 40.3 (1999), 420–34.Google Scholar
Bevington, David. ‘Asleep Onstage’ in Alford, John A. (ed.), From Page to Performance: Essays in Early English Drama. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1995. 51–83.Google Scholar
Bevington, David. ‘Conclusion. The Evil of “Medieval”’ in Morse, Ruth, Cooper, Helen and Holland, Peter (eds.), Medieval Shakespeare: Pasts and Presents. Cambridge University Press, 2013. 232–7.Google Scholar
Bies, Frank. Republik der Angst. Eine andere Geschichte der Bundesrepublik. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 2019.Google Scholar
Bishop, Tom. ‘Blin on Beckett: Interviewed by Tom Bishop’ in Gontarski, Stanley E (ed. and introd.), On Beckett: Essays and Criticism. New York: Grove, 1986. 226–35.Google Scholar
Bizub, Edward. ‘Beckett’s Boots: The Crux of Meaning’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 25 (2013), 267–78.Google Scholar
Blau, Herbert. Sails of the Herring Fleet: Essays on Beckett. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bloom, Gina. ‘Time to Cheat: Chess and The Tempest’s Performative History of Dynastic Marriage’ in Traub, Valeria (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Embodiment: Gender, Sexuality and Race. Oxford University Press, 2016. 419–34.Google Scholar
Boehm, Gottfried and Pfotenhauer, Helmut. Beschreibungskunst, Kunstbeschreibung: Ekphrasis von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Munich: Fink, 1995.Google Scholar
Boitani, Piero. ‘Irish Dante: Yeats, Joyce, Beckett’ in Gragnolati, Manuele, Camilletti, Fabio and Lampart, Fabian (eds.), Metamorphosing Dante: Approximations, Manipulations and Rewritings in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries [Cultural Inquiry 2]. Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2011. 37–59.Google Scholar
Bostridge, Ian. Schubert’s Winter Journey: Anatomy of an Obsession. London: Faber & Faber, 2015.Google Scholar
Bosworth, C.E., Donzel, E. and Heinrichs, W.P. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Islam, vol. IX. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch. ‘Beckett’s Shades of the Color Gray’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 21 (2010), 103–16.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch. ‘Fragments and Beckett’s Form in That Time and Footfalls’. Journal of Beckett Studies, 2 (1977), 70–81.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch. ‘The Company Beckett Keeps: The Shape of Memory and One Fabulist’s Decay of Lying’ in Beja, Morris, Gontarski, S.E. and Astier, Pierre (eds.), Samuel Beckett: Humanistic Perspectives. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1983. 157–71.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch. ‘The Seated Figure on Beckett’s Stage’ in Gontarski, S.E. (ed.), A Companion to Samuel Beckett. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 346–57.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch. (ed.) The Theatrical Gamut: Notes for a Post-Beckettian Stage. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Breuer, Horst. ‘Disintegration of Time in Macbeth’s Soliloquy “Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow”’. Modern Language Review, 71 (1976), 256–71.Google Scholar
Bronfen, Elizabeth. ‘Afterword’, in Döring, Tobias and Fernie, Ewan (eds.), Thomas Mann and Shakespeare: Something Rich and Strange. London: Bloomsbury, 2015. 246–56.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. ‘Endgame as King Lear, or How to Stop Worrying and Love Beckett’. Encore, 12.1 (Jan–Feb 1965), 8–12.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter. The Shifting Point: Forty Years of Theatrical Exploration 1946–1987. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 1989.Google Scholar
Brown, John Russell. ‘Mr. Beckett’s Shakespeare’. Critical Quarterly, 5 (1963), 310–26.Google Scholar
Brown, Paul. ‘“This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine”: The Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism’ in Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan (eds.), Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism. Manchester University Press, 1994. 48–71.Google Scholar
Bryden, Mary. ‘Beckett and the Dynamic Still’ in Uhlmann, Anthony, Houppermans, Sjief and Clément, Bruno (eds.), Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, (1994), 179–92.Google Scholar
Byron, Mark. ‘English Literature’ in Uhlmann, Anthony (ed.), Samuel Beckett in Context. Cambridge University Press, 2013. 218–28.Google Scholar
Campbell, Julie. ‘Allegories of Clarity and Obscurity: Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress and Beckett’s Molloy’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 24 (2012), 89–103.Google Scholar
Carey, Phyllis. ‘Stephen Dedalus, Belacqua Shuah, and Dante’s Pietà’ in Carey, Phyllis and Jewinski, Ed (eds.), RE. Joyce’n Beckett. New York: Fordham University Press, 1992. 104–16.Google Scholar
Carville, Conor. Samuel Beckett and the Visual Arts. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela. Beckett’s Dantes: Intertextuality in the Fiction and Criticism. Manchester University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela. (ed.), Beckett and Nothing: Trying to Understand Beckett. Manchester University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Disowning Knowledge: Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. ‘Ending the Waiting Game: A Reading of Beckett’s Endgame’ in Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge University Press, 2015. 115–62.Google Scholar
Cerrato, Laura. ‘Postmodernism and Beckett’s Aesthetics of Failure’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 2 (1993), 21–30.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Arka. ‘‘Worst in Need of Worse’: King Lear, Worstward Ho and the Trajectory of Worsening’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 24 (2012), 73–87.Google Scholar
Clare, Janet, Shakespeare’s Stage Traffic: Imitation, Borrowing and Competition in Renaissance Theatre. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cohn, Ruby. ‘Beckett’s Theater Resonance’ in Beja, Morris, Gontarski, S.E. and Astier, Pierre (eds.), Samuel Beckett: Humanistic Perspectives. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1983. 3–16.Google Scholar
Cohn, Ruby. Ghosting through Beckett, Beckett in the 1990s, ed. Buning, Marius and Oppenheim, Lois. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1993, 1–11.Google Scholar
Cohn, Ruby. Samuel Beckett: The Comic Gamut. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Connor, Steven. ‘Beckett’s Atmospheres’ in Gontarski, S.E. and Uhlmann, Anthony (eds.), Beckett After Beckett. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2006. 52–65.Google Scholar
Connor, Steven. Beckett, Modernism and the Material Imagination. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Connor, Steven. Samuel Beckett: Repetition, Theory and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. Very Little … Almost Nothing: Death, Philosophy, Literature. London, New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
DaSilva, Gregorio. Intersections between Shakespeare and Beckett on Stage, Screen and Page. Dissertation, University of Birmingham, 2017.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Essays Clinical and Critical, transl. Smith, Daniel W and Greco, Michael A. London, New York: Verso, 1998.Google Scholar
Dent, R.W. ‘Imagination in A Midsummer Night’s Dream’. Shakespeare Quarterly, 15.2 (1964), 115–29.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Acts of Literature, ed. Attridge, Derek. London, New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference, transl., introd. and add. notes by Alan Bass. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar
Döring, Tobias and Vaughan, Virginia Mason (eds.). Critical and Cultural Transformations: Shakespeare’s The Tempest – 1611 to the Present. Tübingen: Narr, 2013.Google Scholar
Drew, Anne Marie (ed.), Past Crimson, Past Woe: The Shakespeare-Beckett Connection. New York, London: Garland, 1993.Google Scholar
Durantave, Leland de la. Beckett’s Art of Mismaking. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Eltis, Sos. ‘“It’s All Symbiosis”: Peter Gall Directing Beckett’ in Tucker, David and McTighe, Trish (eds.), Staging Beckett in Great Britain. London, Oxford, New York, New Delphi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2016. 87–104.Google Scholar
Encyclopedia Britannica: britannica.com.Google Scholar
Esslin, Martin. ‘Introduction’ in Esslin, Martin (ed.), Samuel Beckett: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1965. 1–15.Google Scholar
Estok, Simon C. ‘The Ecocritical Unconscious: Early Modern Sleep as “Go-Between”’ in Ecocriticism and Shakespeare: Reading Ecophobia. New York: Palgrave, 2011. 111–21.Google Scholar
Federman, R. ‘Beckett’s Belacqua and the Inferno of Society’. Arizona Quarterly, 20 (1964), 231–41.Google Scholar
Feldman, Matthew. Beckett’s Books: A Cultural History of the Interwar Notes. London: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Ferrell, Lori Anne. ‘Religion’ in Smith, Bruce R. (ed.), The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare, vol. I. Cambridge University Press, 2016. 681–760.Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, Andrew. ‘“What Wretches Feel”: Lear, Edgar and Samuel Beckett’s Worstward Ho’ in Bradshaw, Graham and Bishop, Tom (eds.), The Shakespearean International Yearbook 7. Special Section, Updating Shakespeare. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007. 256–71.Google Scholar
Foster, Verna. ‘Beckett’s Winter’s Tale: Tragicomic Transformation in Ohio Impromptu’. Journal of Beckett Studies, 1.1–2 (1992), 67–75.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. ‘What is an Author?’ in Faubion, James D (ed.), Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, trans. by Hurley, Robert et al. New York: The New Press, 1999. 205–22.Google Scholar
Fowlie, Wallace. ‘Dante and Beckett’ in McDougal, Stuart (ed.), Dante Among the Moderns. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1985. 129–52.Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. ‘“The rest is silence”. Ineffability and the “Unscene” in Shakespeare’s Plays’ in Hawkins, Peter S., Schotter, Anne Howland and Mandelbaum, Allen (eds.), Ineffability: Naming the Unnamable from Dante to Beckett. New York: AMS, 1984. 35–50.Google Scholar
Garner, Stanton B. Jr. ‘“Still Living Flesh”: Beckett, Merleau-Ponty, and the Phenomenological Body’. Theatre Journal, 45.4 (1993), 443–60.Google Scholar
Giles, Jana Maria. ‘The Aesthetics of Relinquishment: Natural and Social Contracts in Beckett’s The End’. Samuel Beckett Today/Samuel Beckett Aujourd’hui, 20 (2008), 175–88.Google Scholar
Gluck, Barbara Reich. Beckett and Joyce: Friendship and Fiction. Lewisburg, London: Bucknell University Press/Associated University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. ‘A Sense of Unending: Samuel Beckett’s Eschatological Turn’. Samuel Beckett Today/Samuel Beckett Aujourd’hui, 21 (2009), 135–49.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. Beckett Matters: Essays on Beckett’s Late Modernism. Edinburgh University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. Creative Involution: Bergson, Beckett, Deleuze. Edinburgh University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. ‘“I Think This does Call for a Firm Stand.” Beckett at the Royal Court’ in Tucker, David and McTighe, Trish (eds.), Staging Beckett in Great Britain. London, Oxford, New York, New Delphi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2016. 21–36.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. ‘Literary Allusions in Happy Days’ in Gontarski, S.E (ed. and intr.), On Beckett. London: Anthem Press, 2012. 232–44.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. The Intent of Undoing in Samuel Beckett’s Dramatic Texts. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. (ed.) The Beckett Critical Reader: Archives, Theories and Translations. Edinburgh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. (ed.) The Edinburgh Companion to Samuel Beckett and the Arts. Edinburgh University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S.E. and Anthony, Uhlmann (eds.). Beckett after Beckett. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. ‘Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonisation in the Sixteenth Century’ in Chiappelli, Fredi (ed.), First Images of America: The Impact of the New World on the Old. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976. 561–80.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. Voice Terminal Echo: Postmodernism and English Renaissance Texts. New York: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
Guggenheim, Peggy. Out of this Century: Confessions of an Art Addict. London: Deutsch, 2005.Google Scholar
Gunn, Dan. ‘Samuel Beckett’ in Adrian, Poole (ed. and intr.), Joyce, T.S. Eliot, Auden, Beckett: Great Shakespeareans Volume XII. New York: Continuum, 2012. 149–97.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. ‘Das Zeitbewußtsein der Moderne und ihr Bedürfnis nach Selbstvergewisserung’ in Der Philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1989. 9–33.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. ‘Hegels Begriff der Moderne’ in Der Philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1989. 34–58.Google Scholar
Habicht, Werner. ‘“And Mock Our Eyes with Air”: Air and Stage Illusion in Shakespearean Drama’ in Burwick, Frederick and Paper, Walter (eds.), Aestethic Illusion: Theoretical and Historical Approaches. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990. 301–12.Google Scholar
Habicht, Werner. ‘Becketts Baum und Shakespeares Wälder’. Shakespeare-Jahrbuch, 106 (1970), 77–98.Google Scholar
Hackett, Helen. ‘Dream-Visions of Elizabeth I’ in Hidgkin, Katharina, O’Callaghan, Michelle and Wiseman, S.J (eds.), Reading the Early Modern Dream: The Terrors of the Night. New York: Routledge, 2008. 58–61.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, J.D. ‘Shakespeare, Son of Beckett?’ Modern Language Quarterly, 25 (1964), 346–55.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. Exposed by the Mask: Form and Language in Drama. London: Oberon Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Hall, Ronald. ‘Sleeping through Shakespeare’. Shakespeare in Southern Africa, 12 (1999/2000), 24–32.Google Scholar
Halpern, Richard. ‘After Beckett’ in Halpern, Richard (ed.), Eclipse of Action. Tragedy and Political Economy. University of Chicago Press, 2017, 255–73.Google Scholar
Halpern, Richard. ‘Beckett’s Tragic Pantry’, in Halpern, Richard (ed.), Eclipse of Action: Tragedy and Political Economy. University of Chicago Press, 2017. 226–55.Google Scholar
Halpern, Richard. Shakespeare among the Moderns. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Handley, Sasha. Sleep in Early Modern England. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Harmon, Maurice (ed.). No Author Better Served: The Correspondence of Samuel Beckett and Alan Schneider. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Harries, Martin. Scare Quotes from Shakespeare: Marx, Keynes, and the Language of Reenchantment. Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Harris, T.J.G. ‘Lear, Godot, Waste and Other Plays’. PN Review, 24.4 [120] (1998), 55-58.Google Scholar
Hennessy, Peter. Having It So Good: Britain in the Fifties. London: Penguin, 2007 [2006].Google Scholar
Hill, Leslie. Beckett’s Fiction: In Different Words. Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hinden, Michael. ‘After Beckett: The Plays of Pinter, Stoppard, and Shepard’. Contemporary Literature, 27.3 (1986), 400–8.Google Scholar
Hird, Alastair. ‘“What does it Matter Who is Speaking”: Beckett, Foucault, Barthes’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 22 (2010), 289–99.Google Scholar
Höfele, Andreas. ‘Erwachen in Shakespeares A Midsummer Night’s Dream’. Archiv für das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen, 228 (1991), 41–51.Google Scholar
Höfele, Andreas. No Hamlets: German Shakespeare from Nietzsche to Carl Schmitt. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hollander, John. The Figure of Echo: A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. ‘Dreams and the Play’s Structure’ in Thomason, Stephen P. (ed.), Readings on A Midsummer Night’s Dream. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2011. 84–90.Google Scholar
Hulle, Dirk van. ‘Adorno’s Notes on Endgame’. Journal of Beckett Studies, 19.2 (2010), 196–217.Google Scholar
Hulle, Dirk van. ‘Beckett and Shakespeare on Nothing, or, Whatever Lurks behind the Veil’. Limit(e) Beckett, 1 (2010), 123–36.Google Scholar
Hulle, Dirk van. ‘Beckett’s Principle of Reversibility: Chiasmus and the “Shape of Ideas”’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 21 (2009), 179–93.Google Scholar
Hulle, Dirk van. ‘Undoing Dante: Samuel Beckett’s Poetics from a Textual Perspective’. Text, 16 (2006), 87–95.Google Scholar
Hulle, Dirk van and Mark, Nixon. Samuel Beckett’s Library. Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hulle, van, Dirk and Verhulst, Pim. The Making of Beckett’s En attendant Godot/Waiting for Godot. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. ‘Counter-Sensical Comedy and Audience Response in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot’ in Connor, Steven (ed.), New Casebooks: Waiting for Godot and Endgame. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992. 55–70.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. ‘The Pattern of Negativity in Beckett’s Prose’ in Bloom, Harold (ed.), Samuel Beckett: Modern Critical Views. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 1985. 140–51.Google Scholar
Judt, Tony. Postwar: A History of Germany since 1945. London: Random House Vintage, 2010 [2005].Google Scholar
Juliet, Charles. Conversations with Samuel Beckett and Bram van Velde, transl. Cooke, Tracy and Nesme, Axel. London: Dalkey, 2009.Google Scholar
Katz, Daniel. ‘What Remains of Beckett: Evasion and History’ in Maude, Ulrika and Feldman, Matthew (eds.), Beckett and Phenomenology. London: Continuum, 2009. 144–57.Google Scholar
Kenner, Hugh. Flaubert, Joyce and Beckett: The Stoic Comedians. London: W.H. Allen, 1964.Google Scholar
Kenner, Hugh. ‘“Life in the Box”: Twentieth-Century Interpretations of Endgame’ in Chevigny, Bell Gale (ed. and introd.), A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1969. 53–60.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction with a New Epilogue. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kiberd, Declan. ‘Shakespeare and Company: Hamlet in Kildare Street’, in Clare, Janet (ed.), Shakespeare and the Irish Writer. University College Dublin Press, 2010. 95–106.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James. ‘Beckett and Seventeenth-Century Dutch and Flemish Art’. Samuel Beckett Today/Auhourd’hui, 21 (2009), 27–44.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James. Damned to Fame. The Life of Samuel Beckett. London: Bloomsbury, 1997.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James. Happy Days: Samuel Beckett’s Production Notebook. New York: Grove, 1957.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James. Light and Darkness in the Theatre of Samuel Beckett: Text of a Public Lecture Delivered at Trinity College, Dublin, on February 7th, 1972. London: Turret, 1972.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James. ‘Practical Aspects of Theatre, Radio, and Television: Extracts from an Unscripted Interview with Billie Whitelaw’. Journal of Beckett Studies, 3 (1978), 85–91.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James and Pilling, John. Frescoes of the Skull: The Late Prose and Drama of Samuel Beckett. London: John Calder, 1979.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James, and Knowlson, Elizabeth (eds.). Beckett Remembering, Remembering Beckett. New York: Arcade, 2006.Google Scholar
Kott, Jan. Shakespeare our Contemporary, transl. Taborski, Boleslaw, pref. by Brook, Peter. London: Methuen, 1965.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. ‘Bakhtine, le Mot, le Dialogue et le Roman’. Critique, 23.4 (Avril 1967), 438–65.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. ‘Word, Dialogue and Novel’ in Moi, Toril (ed.), The Kristeva Reader. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. 34–61.Google Scholar
Kumar, Jeevan K. ‘The Chess Metaphor in Samuel Beckett’s Endgame’. Modern Drama, 40.4 (1997), 540–52.Google Scholar
Loughrey, Bryan and Taylor, Neil. ‘Ferdinand and Miranda at Chess’. Shakespeare Survey, 35 (1982), 113–18.Google Scholar
Lawly, Paul. ‘“The Grim Journey”: Beckett Listens to Schubert’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 11 (2001), 255–66.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hans-Thies. Postdramatisches Theater. Frankfurt a. M.: Verlag der Autoren, 1999.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jill L. ‘Stoppard’s Shakespeare’ in Kelly, Katherine E (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stoppard. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 154–70.Google Scholar
Lewin, Jennifer. ‘“Your Actions are My Dreams”: Sleepy Minds in Shakespeare’s Last Plays’. Shakespeare Studies, 31 (2003), 184–204.Google Scholar
Liebow, Cynthia. ‘Shakespeare, Beckett and Pinter’ in Gauthier, Brigitte (ed.), Viva Pinter: Harold Pinter’s Spirit of Resistance. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2009, 111–18.Google Scholar
Lobsien, Eckhard. Der Alltag des Ulysses. Die Vermittlung von Ästhetischer und Lebensweltlicher Erfahrung. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1978.Google Scholar
Long, Joseph. ‘Divine Intertextuality: Samuel Beckett, Company, Le Dépeupleur’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 9 (2000), 145–57.Google Scholar
Loomba, Anja. ‘Shakespeare and Cultural Difference’ in Hawkes, Terence (ed.), Alternative Shakespeares, vol. II. London: Routledge, 1996, 164–91.Google Scholar
Lyons, Charles R. ‘Beckett, Shakespeare, and the Making of Theory’ in Brater, Enoch and Cohn, Ruby (eds.), Around the Absurd: Essays on Modern and Postmodern Drama. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990. 97–127.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. ‘Exchanging Visions: Reading A Midsummer Night’s Dream’ in Bloom, Harold (ed.), William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer’s Night’s Dream: Modern Critical Interpretations. New York: Chelsea House. 87–115.Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter. Beliefs and the Dead in Reformation England. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter. ‘The Reformation of Hell? Protestant and Catholic Infernalism in England c.1560–1640’. Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 61 (2010), 279–98.Google Scholar
Matthews, Steven. ‘Beckett’s Late Style’ in Barfield, Steven, Feldman, Matthew and Tew, Philip (eds.), Beckett and Death. London: Continuum, 2009. 188–205.Google Scholar
Mazzio, Carla. ‘The History of Air. Hamlet and the Trouble with Instruments’. South Central Review, 26.1–2 (2009), 153–96.Google Scholar
McCourt, John. ‘Joyce’s Shakespeare. A View from Trieste’ in Pelaschiar, Laura (ed.), Joyce/Shakespeare. New York: Syracuse University Press, 2015. 72–88.Google Scholar
McMullan, Anna and Wilmer, S.E. (eds.). Reflections on Beckett: A Centenary Celebration. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Moorjani, Angela. ‘Beckett’s Racinian Fictions: “Racine and the Modern Novel” Revisited’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 24 (2012), 41–55.Google Scholar
Moorjani, Angela. ‘Peau de Chagrin. Beckett and Bion on Looking not to See’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 14 (2004), 25–38.Google Scholar
Morse, Ruth, Cooper, Helen and Holland, Peter (eds.). Medieval Shakespeare: Pasts and Presents. Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Murphy, John L. ‘Beckett’s Pugatories’ in Jaurretche, Colleen (ed.), Beckett, Joyce and the Art of the Negative. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2005. 109–24.Google Scholar
Murphy, Peter J. Beckett’s Dedalus: Dialogic Encounters with Joyce in Beckett’s Fiction. University of Toronto Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Murphy, Peter J. ‘Reincarnations of Joyce in Beckett’s Fiction’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 22 (2010), 67–77.Google Scholar
Neumann, Gerhard. ‘Inszenierung und Destruktion. Zum Problem der Intertextualität in Samuel Becketts Erzählung Dante and the Lobster’. Poetica, 19 (1987), 278–301.Google Scholar
Olk, Claudia. ‘“Ah the soap”: Objekt und Materie im Ulysses’. Poetica, 40 (2008), 169–88.Google Scholar
Olk, Claudia. ‘“A matter of fundamental sounds”: The Music of Beckett’s Endgame’. Poetica, 43 (2011), 391–411.Google Scholar
Olk, Claudia. ‘Prinz Friedrich von Homburg: Kleists Märkischer Hamlet’. Kleist Jahrbuch, (2017), 23–37.Google Scholar
Olk, Claudia. Reisen und Erzählen: Studien zur Entwicklung von Fiktionalität in Narrativen Reisedarstellungen des Englischen Spätmittelalters und der Frühen Neuzeit. Trier: WVT, 1999.Google Scholar
Olk, Claudia. ‘The Musicality of The Merchant of Venice’, in Wald, Christina (ed.), Medieval Shakespeare. London, New York: Routledge, 2012. 386–97.Google Scholar
Olk, Claudia. ‘Vision and Desire in Mary Magdalene and The Winter’s Tale’ in Johnston, Andrew James, Knapp, Ethan and Rouse, Margitta (eds.), The Art of Vision: Ekphrasis in Medieval Literature and Culture. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2015. 79–100.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lois. The Painted Word: Samuel Beckett’s Dialogue with Art. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lois. ‘The Uncanny in Beckett’ in Jaurretche, Colleen (ed.), Beckett, Joyce and the Art of the Negative. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2005, 125–40.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon. Late Shakespeare: A New World of Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000 [1997].Google Scholar
Parris, Benjamin. ‘“The Body is with the King, but the King is not with the Body”: Sovereign Sleep in Hamlet and Macbeth’. Shakespeare Studies, 40 (2012), 101–42.Google Scholar
Patey, Caroline. ‘Beckett’s Shakespeare, or, Silencing the Bard’ in Cianci, Giovanni (ed. and intr.) and Patey, Caroline (ed.), Will the Modernist: Shakespeare and the European Historical Avant-Gardes. Oxford: Lang, 2014. 223–50.Google Scholar
Pattie, David. ‘The Arrival of Godot: Beckett, Cultural Memory and 1950s British Theatre’ in Tucker, David and McTighe, Trish (eds.), Staging Beckett in Great Britain. London, Oxford, New York, New Delphi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2016. 3–20.Google Scholar
Paulin, Roger. The Critical Reception of Shakespeare in Germany 1682–1914: Native Literature and Foreign Genius. Hildesheim: Olms, 2003.Google Scholar
Pavese, Michael. ‘On the Five Nevers’. High Plains Literary Review, 9.3 (1994), 47–61.Google Scholar
Peat, Derek. ‘“And that’s true too”: King Lear and the Tension of Uncertainty’. Shakespeare Survey, 33 (1980), 43–53.Google Scholar
Pelaschiar, Laura (ed.). Joyce/Shakespeare. New York: Syracuse University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pfister, Manfred. ‘Beckett, Barker, and Other Grim Laughter’ in Pfister, Manfred (ed.), A History of English Laughter – Laughter from Beowulf to Beckett and Beyond. New York: Rodopi, 2002. 175–89.Google Scholar
Pilling, John. ‘Dates and Difficulties in Beckett’s Whoroscope Notebook’. Journal of Beckett Studies, 3 (2004), 39–48.Google Scholar
Pilling, John. ‘From a (W)horoscope to Murphy’ in Pilling, John and Bryden, Mary (eds.), ‘The Ideal Core of the Onion’: Reading Beckett Archives. Reading: Beckett International Foundation, 1992. 1–20.Google Scholar
Plock, Vike Martina. ‘Made in Germany. Why Goethe’s Hamlet Mattered to Joyce’ in Pelaschiar, Laura (ed.), Joyce/Shakespeare. New York: Syracuse University Press, 2015. 89–106.Google Scholar
Poole, William. ‘False Play: Shakespeare and Chess’. Shakespeare Quarterly, 55 (2004), 50–70.Google Scholar
Pountney, Rosemary. Theatre of Shadows: Samuel Beckett’s Drama, 1956–1976. Gerrards Cross: Smythe, 1988.Google Scholar
Poussin, Nicolas. Lettres et Propos sur l’Art. Textes réunis et présentés par Anthony Blunt. Paris: Hermann, 1964.Google Scholar
Pye, Christopher. Storm at Sea: Political Aesthetics in the Time of Shakespeare. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rabaté, Jean-Michel. The Pathos of Distance. Affects of the Moderns. New York, London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
Rabaté, Jean-Michel. Think, Pig! Beckett at the Limit of the Human. New York: Fordham, 2016.Google Scholar
Rabinovitz, Ruben. The Development of Samuel Beckett’s Fiction. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Sophie. ‘Savage Loving: Beckett, Browning and The Tempest’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 12 (2002), 147–62.Google Scholar
Rebellato, Dan. 1956 and All That: The Making of Modern British Drama. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Rehberg, Walter and Rehberg, Paula. Franz Schubert. Sein Leben und Werk. Zürich: Artemis, 1946.Google Scholar
Reichert, Klaus. ‘Endlose Enden. Zu Apokalyptischen Figuren bei Beckett und Shakespeare’ in Stierle, Karlheinz and Warning, Rainer (eds.), Das Ende. Figuren einer Denkform. Munich: Fink, 1996. 495–514.Google Scholar
Restivo, Giuseppina. ‘Caliban/Clov and Leopardi’s Boy: Beckett and Postmodernism’ in Stewart, Bruce (ed.), Beckett and Beyond. Gerrards Cross: Smythe, 1999, 217–30.Google Scholar
Robbe-Grillet, Alain. ‘Samuel Beckett, or “Presence” in the Theatre’ in Esslin, Martin (ed.), Samuel Beckett: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1965. 108–16.Google Scholar
Roberts, David. ‘Sleeping Beauties: Shakespeare, Sleep and the Stage’. The Cambridge Quarterly, 35.3 (2006), 231–54.Google Scholar
Robinson, Michael. ‘From Purgatory to Inferno: Beckett and Dante Revisited’. Journal of Beckettian Studies, 5 (1979), 69–82.Google Scholar
Russel Taylor, John. Anger and After: A Guide to the New British Drama. London: Methuen, 1962.Google Scholar
Ruvoldt, Maria. The Renaissance Imagery of Inspiration: Metaphors of Sex, Sleep and Dreams. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Ruyter, Danièle de. ‘Facination de la Tragédie Racinienne: Resonances dans Oh les beaux jours’. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 24 (2012), 57–71.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Laura. Samuel Beckett: Laughing Matters, Comic Timing. Edinburgh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Saunders, Graham. ‘Contracts, Clauses and Nudes: Breath, Oh! Calcutta! and the Freedom of Authorship’ in Tucker, David and McTighe, Trish (eds.), Staging Beckett in Great Britain. London, Oxford, New York, New Delphi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2016. 177–92.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. ‘Tradition und Legitimation’ in Höfele, Andreas, Müller, Jan-Dirk and Oesterreicher, Wulf (eds.), Die Frühe Neuzeit: Revisionen einer Epoche. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2013. 47–83.Google Scholar
Schneider, Alan. ‘Waiting for Beckett: A Personal Chronicle’. Chelsea Review, 2 (September 1958), 3–20.Google Scholar
Schwab, Gabriele. ‘On the Dialectic of Closing and Opening in Samuel Beckett’s Endgame’ in Connor, Steven (ed.), New Casebooks: Waiting for Godot and Endgame. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1996. 87–99.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Paul. ‘Beckett’s Ghost Dramas: Monitoring a Phenomenology of Sleep’ in Maude, Ulrika and Feldmann, Matthew (eds.), Beckett and Phenomenology. London: Continuum, 2009. 158–76.Google Scholar
Shenker, Israel. ‘An Interview with Beckett’ in Federman, Raymond and Graver, Lawrence (eds.), Samuel Beckett: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge, 1979. 160–3.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. ‘Shakespearean Somniloquy: Sleep and Transformation in The Tempest’ in Healy, Tom and Healy, Margaret (eds.), Renaissance Transformations: The Making of English Writing. Edinburgh University Press, 2009. 177–91.Google Scholar
Slote, Sam. ‘The Joyce Circle’ in Uhlmann, Anthony (ed.), Samuel Beckett in Context. Cambridge University Press, 2013. 150–9.Google Scholar
Slote, Sam. ‘Stuck in Translation: Beckett and Borges on Dante’. Journal of Beckett Studies, 19.1 (2010), 15–28.Google Scholar
Smart, Sara and Wade, Mara R (eds.). The Palatine Wedding of 1613: Protestant Alliance and Court Festival. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2013.Google Scholar
Smith, Frederik N. ‘Fiction as Composing Process: How It Is’ in Beja, Morris, Gontarski, S.E. and Astier, Pierre (eds.), Samuel Beckett: Humanistic Perspectives. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1983. 107–21.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard Carter. ‘Beckett and the Animal: Writing from “No-Man’s Land”’. ELH, 79 (2012), 211–35.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. ‘Waiting for Godot in Sarajevo’. Performing Arts Journal, 16.2 (1994), 87–106.Google Scholar
Spurr, David. Joyce and the Scene of Modernity. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2002.Google Scholar
Stewart, Paul. ‘But Why Shakespeare? The Muted Role of Dickens in Endgame’ in Byron, Mark S. and Meyer, Michael J. (eds.), Samuel Beckett’s Endgame. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007. 207–25.Google Scholar
Stewart, Paul. ‘Stages of Influence. Shakespeare, Joyce; Joyce, Beckett’. In-Between: Essays and Studies in Literary Criticism, 12.1–2 (2003), 99-111.Google Scholar
Strauss, Walter. ‘Dante’s Belacqua and Beckett’s Tramps’. Comparative Literature, 11.3 (1959), 250–61.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Garrett Jr. Sleep, Romance, and Human Embodiment: Vitality from Spenser to Milton. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Swander, Homer. ‘Shakespeare and Beckett: What the Words Know’ in Thompson, Marvin, Thompson, Ruth, and Halio, Jay L. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Sense of Performance: Essays in the Tradition of Performance Criticism in Honor of Bernard Beckerman. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1989. 60–78.Google Scholar
Tassi, Marguerite. ‘Shakespeare and Beckett Revisited: A Phenomenology of Theater’. Comparative Drama, 31.2 (1997), 248–76.Google Scholar
Taylor, Neil and Loughrey, Bryan. ‘Middleton’s Chess Strategies in Women Beware Women’. SEL, 24.2 (1984), 341–54.Google Scholar
Trezise, Thomas. Into the Breach: Samuel Beckett and the Ends of Literature. Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Tucker, David and McTighe, Trish (eds.). Staging Beckett in Great Britain. London, Oxford, New York, New Delphi, Sydney: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
Turner, Timothy A. ‘Making the Moor: Torture, Sleep Deprivation, and Race in Othello’ in Simpson-Younger, Nancy L. and Simon, Margaret (eds.), Forming Sleep: Representing Consciousness in the English Renaissance. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2020. 89–109.Google Scholar
Unglaub, Jonathan. Poussin and the Poetics of Painting: Pictorial Narrative and the Legative of Tasso. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Vandervlist, Harry. ‘Beckett, Duchamp and Chess: A Crossroads at Arcachon in the Summer of 1940’. Caliban, 33 (2013), 173–82.Google Scholar
Vendler, Helen. The Art of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Weidle, Roland. ‘“If man were porter of hell gate”: Dante in der Englischen Frühen Neuzeit und Shakespeares Hölle’ in Heimgartner, Stephanie and Schmitz-Emans, Monika (eds.), Komparatistische Perspektiven auf Dantes ‘Divina Commedia’. Lektüren, Transformationen und Visualisierungen. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2017. 183–205.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane. Literature, Philosophy, Nihilism: The Uncanniest of Guests. London, New York: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane. ‘Phenomenologies of the Nothing: Democritus, Heidegger, Beckett’ in Maude, Ulrika and Feldmann, Matthew (eds.), Beckett and Phenomenology. London, New York: Continuum, 2009, 39–55.Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley. ‘My Name is Will: Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Autobiography’. Shakespeare Survey, 68 (2015), 99–108.Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley and Edmondson, Paul. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Wheatley, David. ‘“Nothing Will Come of Nothing”: Zero-Sum Games in Shakespeare’s King Lear and Beckett’s Endgame’ in Clare, Janet (ed.), Shakespeare and the Irish Writer. University College Dublin Press, 2010. 166–79.Google Scholar
Williams, Simon J. Sleep and Society: Sociological Ventures into the (Un)Known. London, New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. The Invisible World: Early Modern Philosophy and the Invention of the Microscope. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Wiseman, S.J. ‘Introduction’ in Hidgkin, Katharina, O’Callaghan, Michelle and Wiseman, S.J. (eds.), Reading the Early Modern Dream: Terrors of the Night. New York, London: Routledge, 2008. 1–13.Google Scholar
Wolosky, Shira. ‘The Negative Way Negated: Samuel Beckett’s Texts for Nothing’. NLH, 22.1 (199), 213–30.Google Scholar
Youens, Susan. Retracing a Winter’s Journey: Schubert’s ‘Winterreise’. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Zeifman, Hersh. ‘Come and Go: A Criticule’, in Beja, Morris, Gontarski, S.E. and Astier, Pierre (eds.), Samuel Beckett: Humanistic Perspectives. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1983, 137–44.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. ‘The Minimal Event: Subjective Destitution in Shakespeare and Beckett’ in Sbriglia, Russell (ed.), Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Literature but were Afraid to Ask Žižek. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017. 290–316.Google Scholar