The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic Quintus Smyrnaeus' <I>Posthomerica</I> and the Poetics of Impersonation
Book contents
- The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic
- Greek Culture in the Roman World
- The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Editions, Translations and Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Beginning Again (Introduction)
- Part I Quintus as Homer: Illusion and Imitation
- Part II Quintus as Quintus: Antagonism and Assimilation
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum for Resurrection of Homer
- Subject index for Resurrection of Homer
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 September 2020
Book contents
- The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic
- Greek Culture in the Roman World
- The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Editions, Translations and Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Beginning Again (Introduction)
- Part I Quintus as Homer: Illusion and Imitation
- Part II Quintus as Quintus: Antagonism and Assimilation
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum for Resurrection of Homer
- Subject index for Resurrection of Homer
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek EpicQuintus Smyrnaeus' <I>Posthomerica</I> and the Poetics of Impersonation, pp. 345 - 373Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2016) ‘Composing the Masters: An Essay on Nonnus and Hellenistic Poetry’ in Accorinti, (ed.): 507–28.Google Scholar
Adams, J. (2003) Bilingualism and The Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J., Janse, M. and Swain, S. (eds.) (2002) Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and The Written Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. (1969) ‘Threatening, Abusing and Feeling Angry in the Homeric to Poems.; in JHS 89: 7–21.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. (2006) ‘La voce dei libri: dimensioni performative dell’epica greca tardoantica’ in Amato, E., Roduit, A. and Steinrück, M. (eds.) Approches de la Troisième Sophistique: hommages à Jacques Schamp. Brussels: Latomus: 35–62.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1984a) ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’ in AJPh 105 (2): 174–208.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1984b) = ‘The Rider and the Horse: Politics and Power in Roman Poetry from Horace to Statius’ in ANRW II 32.1–40.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. E. (1993) Graecia Capta: The Landscapes of Roman Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alden, M. J. (2000) Homer Beside Himself: Para-Narratives in the Iliad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiou, M. (1974) The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, D. S. (2001) ‘Gorgianic Figures’ in Sloane, T. O. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Rhetoric, vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 321–3.Google Scholar
Amato, E. and Schamp, J. (eds.) (2005) Ethopoiia. La représentation de caractères entre fiction scolaire et réalité vivante à l’époque impériale et tardive. Salerno: Helios Editrice.Google Scholar
Amir, Y. (1985) ‘Homer und Bibel als Ausdrucksmittel im 3. Sibyllenbuch’ in Studien zum Antiken Judentum. Frankfurt: 83–100.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1978) ‘Patterns in Lucian’s Quotations’ in Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 25: 97–100.Google Scholar
Anderson, G.: (1993) The Second Sophistic: A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2012) Imperial Rome AD 193 to 284: The Critical Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, W. (1993) ‘Die homerischen hapax legomena bei Quintus Smyrnaeus’ in Adverbien in Glotta 71: 178–88.Google Scholar
Appel, W. (1994a) Die homerischen hapax legomena in den Posthomerica des Quintus Smyrnaeus. Toruń.Google Scholar
Appel, W. (1994b) ‘Zur Frage der interpretatio Homeri bei den späteren Dichtern’ in ZPE 101: 49–52.Google Scholar
Aurigemma, F. (1953) ‘Appendice: tre nuovi cicli di figurazioni ispirate all’Iliade in case della Via dell’Abbondanza in Pompei’ in Spinazzola, V. (ed.) Pompei alla luce degli scavi nuovi di Via dell’Abbondanza (anni 1920–23). Rome: Libreria della Stato: 867–1008.Google Scholar
Austin, R. (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981) ‘Epic and Novel’ in The Dialogic Imagination (ed. and introduction by Holquist, M.). Austin: University of Texas Press: 3–40.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2008) ‘Epic Remembering’ in Mackay, A. (ed.) Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World. Leiden: Brill: 65–78.Google Scholar
Bannert, H. and Kröll, N. (2016) ‘Nonnus and the Homeric Poems’ in Accorinti, (ed.): 479–506.Google Scholar
Bär, S. (2007) ‘Quintus Smyrnaeus und die Tradition des epischen Musenanrufs’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 29–64.Google Scholar
Bär, S. (2009) Quintus Smyrnaeus Posthomerica 1. Die Wiedergeburt des Epos aus dem Geiste der Amazonomachie. Mit einem Kommentar zu den Versen 1–219. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Bär, S. (2012) ‘“Museum of words”: Christodorus, the Art of Ekphrasis, and the Epyllic Genre’, in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 447–71.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1986) ‘Problemi d’interpretazione in Ovidio: continuità delle storie, continuazione dei testi’ in MD 16: 77–107.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1993) ‘Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion in Ovid’s Heroides’ in HSCP 95: 333–6.Google Scholar
Barnouw, E. (ed.) (1989) International Encyclopaedia of Communications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (2001) ‘The Death of the Author’. Translated by Heath, Stephen in Leitch, V. B., The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York: WW Norton & Company: 1466–70.Google Scholar
Bassett, S. (1925) ‘The Laocoon Episode in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ in AJPh 46 (3): 243–252.Google Scholar
Bassett, S. (1996) ‘Historiae custos: Sculpture and Tradition in the Baths of Zeuxippos’, AJA 100: 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, S. (2004) The Urban Image of Late Antique Constantinople. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bassino, P. (2018) The “Certamen Homeri Et Hesiodi”: A Commentary. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.) (2007) Quintus Smyrnaeus: Transforming Homer in Second Sophistic Epic. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.) (2007) ‘An Introduction to Quintus’ Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 1–26.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.) (2012) Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and Its Reception. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (2015) ‘The Epic Cycle and Imperial Greek Epic’ in Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.) The Greek Epic Cycle and Its Ancient Reception: A Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 604–22.Google Scholar
Beall, S. (2001) ‘Homo fandi dulcissimus: the Role of Favorinus in the Attic Nights of Aulus Gellius’ in AJPh 122: 87–106.Google Scholar
Bekker, I. (ed.) (1833) Apollonii Sophistae: Lexicon Homericum Recensuit Immanuelelis Bekkeri. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Benoit, W. (1982) ‘The Most Significant Passage in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’ in Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 12: 2–9.Google Scholar
Bergen, A. (1983) ‘Odyssean Temporality: Many (Re)Turns’ in Rubino, C. A. and Shelmerdine, W. (eds.) Approaches to Homer. Austin: University of Texas Press: 38–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1987) (ed.) Poetarum epicorum Graecorum testimonia et fragmenta, pt. 1. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. and Zuber, C. (2000) Das Lob der Fliege von Lukian bis L.B. Alberti. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blondell, R. (2002) The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (1997) The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (2011) The Anatomy of Influence: Literature as a Way of Life. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bodnar, J. (1992) Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boeke, H. (2007) The Value of Victory in Pindar’s Odes: Gnomai, Cosmology and the Role of the Poet. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1990) Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. (1989a) ‘Greek Sophists and Greek Poetry in the Second Sophistic’ in ANRW II 33 (1): 209–58.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1989b) ‘Poetry and Poets in Asia and Achaia’ in Cameron, Averil and Walker, S. (eds.) The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire (ICS Bulletin Supplement 55). London: University of London, Institute of Classical Studies: 198–205.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1990) Greek Poetry in the Antonine Age’ in Russell, D. (ed.) Antonine Literature, Oxford: 53–90.Google Scholar
Bowlby, R. (2007) Freudian Mythologies: Greek Tragedy and Modern Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyten, B. (2007) ‘More “Parfit Gentil Knyght” than “Hyrcanian Beast”: The Reception of Neoptolemus in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 307–36.Google Scholar
Boyten, B. (2010) Epic Journeys: Studies in the Reception of the Hero and Heroism in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica. PhD Diss. at University College London (published online: discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1310146/1/1310146.pdf. Date last accessed: 07.04.20).Google Scholar
Bradshaw, E. and Berenson Maclean, J. K. (2004) Philostratus’s Heroikos: Religion and Cultural Identity in the Third Century C.E. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Braune, J. (1935) Nonnos und Ovid. Greifswalder Beiträge zur Literatur – und Stilforschung. Greifswald: Dallmeyer.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. (1984) Visual Narratives: Story-telling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, K. (1946) ‘Callimachus and Aristotle: an Inquiry into Callimachus’ ПΡΟΣ ПΡΑΞΙΦΑΝΗΝ’ in CQ 40: 11–26.Google Scholar
Bruns, I. (1896) Das literarische Porträt der Griechen im fünften und vierten Jahrhundert vor Christi geburt. Olms.Google Scholar
Bryant Davies, R. (2017) ‘The Figure of Mary Mother of God in Christus Patiens: Fragmenting Tragic Myth and Passion Narrative in a Byzantine Appropriation of Euripidean Tragedy’ in JHS 137: 188–212.Google Scholar
Buffière, F. (1956) Les myths d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Buitenwerf, R. (2003) Book III of the Sibylline Oracles and Its Social Setting. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. (2001) The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. (2000) Begotten, Not Made: Conceiving Manhood in Late Antiquity (Figurae: Reading Medieval Culture). Stanford.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. (2008) The Sex Lives of Saints: An Erotics of Ancient Hagiography, Divinations: Rereading Late Antique Religion. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Butler, H. (trans.) (1921) The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Byre, C. (1982) ‘Per Aspera (et Arborem) ad Astra: Ramifications of the Allegory of Arete in Quintus Smyrnaeus Posthomerica 5.49–68’, in Hermes 110: 184–95.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. (1981) A Commentary on Quintus Smyrnaeus, Posthomerica XII. Mnemosyne Supplement 71. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camplani, A. (2015) ‘Per un profilo storico-religioso degli ambienti di produzione e fruizione dei Papiri Bodmer: contaminazione dei linguaggi e dialettica delle idee nel contesto del dibattito su dualismo e origenismo’, in Camplani, A. and Cacciari, A. (eds.) Adamantius 21.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan (1995) Callimachus and His Critics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan (2004) Greek Mythography in the Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan (2016) Wandering Poets and Other Essays on Late Greek Literature and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, M. (1996) Performance: A Critical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carvounis, K. (2005) Transformations of Epic: Reading Quintus of Smyrna, Posthomerica XIV. DPhil Diss. at the University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Carvounis, K (2007) ‘Final Scenes in Quintus of Smyrna, Posthomerica 14’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 241–57.Google Scholar
Carvounis, K (2014) ‘Landscape Markers and Time in Quintus’ Posthomerica’ in Skempis, M. and Ziogos, I. (eds.) Geography, Topography, Landscape: Configurations of Space in Greek and Roman Epic. Berlin: de Gruyter: 181–208.Google Scholar
Carvounis, K (2019) A Commentary on Quintus of Smyrna, Posthomerica 14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carvounis, K (forthcoming) ‘Poetry, Performance and Quintus’ Posthomerica’ in Bär, S., Greensmith, E. and Ozbek, L.. (eds.) Writing Homer Under Rome: Quintus of Smyrna in and Beyond the Second Sophistic.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. (2007) ‘Places of Public Reading in Late Antiquity’ in Derda, T., Markiewicz, T. and Wipszycka, E. (eds.) Alexandria. Auditoria of Kom el-Dikka and Late Antique Education. Warsaw: Journal of Juristic Papyrology: 151–6.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, P. (2014) The War with God: Theomachy in Roman Imperial Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chondros, T., Milidonis, K., Vitzilaios, G. and Vaitsis, J. (2013) ‘“Deus-Ex-Machina” Reconstruction in the Athens Theater of Dionysus’ in Mechanism and Machine Theory. 67: 172–91.Google Scholar
Chrysafis, G. (1985) ‘Pedantry and Elegance in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’ in Corolla Londiniensis 4: 17–42.Google Scholar
Chuvin, P. (1972) Nonnos de Panopolis. Les Dionysiaques, III. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (1993) Women in Late Antiquity: Pagan and Christian Lifestyles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (1991) The Houses of Roman Italy, 100 BC – AD 250: Ritual, Space and Decoration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1997) The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. London: Rowman and Littlefield (Originally published 1983: Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Cloke, G. (1995) This Female Man of God: Women and Spiritual Power in the Patristic Age, AD 350-450. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (2004) Master of the Game: Competition and Performance in Greek Poetry. Washington: Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. (1974) The Sibylline Oracles of Egyptian Judaism. Missoula: Society for Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2001a) ‘The Problems of the Past in Imperial Greek Education’ in Too, Y. L. (ed.) Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden, Brill: 339–72.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2001b) ‘Reclaiming the Theatrical in the Second Sophistic’ in Stehle, (ed.): 75–95.Google Scholar
Conte, G. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Conte, G. (1992) ‘Proems in the Middle’ in Dunn, F. M. and Cole, T. (eds.) Beginnings in Classical Literature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 147–59.Google Scholar
Coon, L. (1997) Sacred Fictions: Holy Women and Hagiography in Late Antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, K. (1996) The Virgin and the Bride: Idealized Womanhood in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. (2007a) ‘Gender and the Fall of Rome’, in Rousseau, P. (ed.), A Companion to Late Antiquity, Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World Oxford: 187–200.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. (2007b) The Fall of the Roman Household. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crane, G. (1990) ‘Ajax, the Unexpected, and the Deception Speech’ in Classical Philology 85 (2): 89–101.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (2015) ‘“Reordering the Confusion”: Tatian, the Second Sophistic, and the So-called Diatessaron’ in Zeitschrift für Antike und Christentum 19: 209–36.Google Scholar
Crawford, M: (2016) ‘The Diatessaron, Canonical or Non-canonical? Rereading the Dura Fragment’ in New Testament Studies 62 (2): 253–77.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (2001): Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crotty, K. (1994) The Poetics of Supplication: Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cuypers, M. (2005) ‘Interactional Particles and Narrative Voice in Apollonius and Homer’ in Harder, A. and Cuypers, M. (eds.) Beginning from Apollo. Studies in Apollonius Rhodius and the Argonautic Tradition. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Dausque, (1614) ‘Notes on Quintus Calaber, Coluthus, and Triphiodorus’, attached to Rhodomann, L., Quinti Calabri Paraleipomena, Id est, Derelicta ab Homero, XIV. Hanover.Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Finglass, P. J. (eds.) 2014. Stesichorus: The Poems. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. (1987a) Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam: Grüner.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. (1987b) ‘The Voice of Anonymity: Tis–speeches in the Iliad’ in Eranos 85: 69–84.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. (2001) A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. (2014) Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. and Nünlist, R. (eds.) (2007) Time in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume Two. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
de Stefani, C. and Magnelli, E. (2011) ‘Callimachus and Late Greek Poetry’ in Acosta–Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden: Brill 534–65.Google Scholar
Deckers, J. G. (1986), ‘Dionysos der Erlöser? Bemerkungen zur Deutung der Bodenmosaiken im “Haus des Aion” in Nea-Paphos auf Cypern durch W.A. Daszewski’ in RQA 81: 145–72.Google Scholar
Demoen, K. (1988) ‘‘The Date of the Cyzicene Epigrams. An Analysis of the Vocabulary and Metrical Technique of AP III’, in AC 57: 231–48.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (2017) ‘Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity’ in Richter, D. and Johnson, W. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook to the Second Sophistic. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 99–114.Google Scholar
Desmond, M. (2016) ‘Trojan Temporality and the Materiality of Literary History’: Paper given at The Cambridge Classical Reception Seminar Series, Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge, 21 January 2016.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J. (1974) Les ruses de l’intelligence: la mètis des Grecs. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
D’Ippolito, G. (1994) Studi nonniani: L’epillio nello Dionisiache. Palermo: Presso L’Accademia.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. (1994) The Mythic Voice of Statius: Power and Politics in the Thebaid. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Doroszewski, F. (2016) Orgie słów. Terminologia misteriów w „Parafrazie Ewangelii wg św. Jana” Nonnosa z Panopolis. Toruń: seria Monografie FNP.Google Scholar
Drijvers, J. (1992) Helena Augusta: The Mother of Constantine the Great and the Legend of her Finding the True Cross. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dubielzig, U. (1996) Τριφιοδώρου Ἰλίον Ἅλωσις. Triphiodor. Die Einnahme Ilions. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Duc, T. (1990) ‘La question de la cohérence dans les Dionysiaques de Nonnos de Panopolis’ in RPh 64: 181–91.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. (1933) ‘Foreshadowing and Suspense in the Posthomerica of Quintus of Smyrna’, in AJPh 57: 58–86.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. (1936) Foreshadowing and Suspense in Homer, Apollonius, and Vergil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. (1999) ‘Actors and Voices: Reading between the Lines in Aeschines and Demosthenes’ in Goldhill, and Osborne, (eds.): 154–66.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2002) ‘Acting and Self-actualisation in Imperial Rome: Some Death scenes’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 377–94.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (1991) The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 5, Books 17–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. (2007) ‘Severan Christianity’ in Swain, , Harrison, and Elsner, (eds.): 401–18.Google Scholar
Elm, S. (1994) Virgins of God: The Making of Asceticism in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1995) Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2004) ‘Late Antique Art: The Problem of the Concept and the Cumulative Aesthetic’ in Swain, S. and Edwards, M. (eds.) Approaching Late Antiquity: The Transformation from Early to Late Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 271–309.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2017) ‘Late Narcissus Classicism and Culture in a Late Roman Cento’ in Elsner, and Hernández Lobato, (eds.): 176–205.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Hernandez Lobato, J. (eds.) (2017) The Poetics of Late Latin Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enos, R. L. (2008) Roman Rhetoric: Revolution and The Greek Influence. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1969) (ed.) Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Scholia Vetera). Volumen Primum, Praefationem et Scholia ad Libros A-A continens. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2001) Troy between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eshleman, K. (2012) The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire: Sophists, Philosophers, and Christians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faber, R. A. (2017) ‘The Hellenistic Origins of Memory as Trope for Literary Allusion in Latin Poetry’ in Philologus 161 (1): 77–89.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. (2012) Achilles in Love. Intertextual Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.) (2015) The Greek Epic Cycle and Its Ancient Reception: A Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Felson, N. (1999) Paradigms of Paternity: Fathers, Sons, and Athletic/Sexual Prowess in Homer’s Odyssey in Kazazis, J. N. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Epic and Its Legacy in Honor of D. N. Maronitis. Stuttgart: F. Steiner: 89–98.Google Scholar
Felson, N. (2002) ‘Threptra and Invincible Hands: The Father–Son Relationship in Iliad 24’ in Arethusa 35: 35–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, N. (1997) Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. London; Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fernandelli, M. (2012) Catullo e la rinascita dell’epos: dal carme 64 all’Eneide. Spudasmata, Bd 142. Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Ferreccio, A. (2014) Commento al libro II dei Posthomerica di Quinto Smirneo. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. (2018) ‘Gazing at Helen with Stesichorus’ in A. Kampakoglou, and A. Novokhatko (eds.), Gaze, Vision, and Visuality in Ancient Greek Literature. (Trends in Classics Supplements; Vol. 54). Berlin: de Gruyter: 140–59.Google Scholar
Finlay, R. A. (1980) ‘Patroklos, Achilleus and Peleus: Fathers and Sons in the Iliad’ in CW 73: 267–73.Google Scholar
Finn, R. (2007) ‘Almsgiving for the Pure of Heart: Continuity and Change in Early Christian Teaching’ in Swain, , Harrison, and Elsner, (eds.): 419–29.Google Scholar
Fiorenza, E. S. (1979) ‘‘Women in the Early Christian Movement’, in Christ, C. P. (ed.), Womanspirit Rising: A Feminist Reader in Religion. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. A. (1982) ‘Greek Translations of Latin Literature in the Fourth Century A.D.’ in Yale Classical Studies 27: 173–215.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2002) The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fournet, J. L. (1992) ‘Une éthopée de Caïn dans le Codex des Visions de la Fondation Bodmer’ in ZPE 92: 254–66.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997) ‘Second Thoughts on Closure’ in Roberts, D., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. (eds.) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 3–22.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000) Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franchi, R. (2013) Nonno di Panopoli. Parafrasi del Vangelo di S. Giovanni: Canto Sesto. Bologna: EDB.Google Scholar
Frangoulis, H. (1999) Nonnos de Panopolis. Les Dionysiaques, XIII: Chant XXVII. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1997) ‘Essence and Nature of the Homeric Similes’ in Jones, P. and Wright, G. (eds.) Homer: German Scholarship in Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 103–23.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. (2016) ‘The Penthesilead of Quintus Smyrnaeus: A Study in Epic Reversal’ in Wiener Studien 129: 207–31.Google Scholar
Friedlander, S. (1991), Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the ‘Final Solution’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gangloff, A. (2010) ‘Rhapsodes et poètes épiques à l’époque impériale’ in REG 123: 51–70.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. (1993) Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2005) Quintus Smyrnaeus und die “Aeneis”: Zur Nachwirkung Vergils in der griechischen Literatur der Kaiserzeit. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2007) ‘Zur Rolle der Personifikationen des Schicksals in den Posthomerica des Quintus Smyrnaeus’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 211–40.Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2014) ‘Schicksal und Entscheidungsfreiheit bei Quintus Smyrnaeus’, in Philologus 58 (1): 97–129.Google Scholar
Geisz, C. (2017) A Study of the Narrator in Nonnus of Panopolis’ Dionysiaca: Storytelling in Late Antique Epic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1980) Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Translated by Lewin, J.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gerlaud, B. (1982) Triphiodore, La Prise d’llion. Texte établi et traduit. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. A. (trans.) (2008) Libanius’s Progymnasmata: Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Giuliano, F. (1995) ‘L’Odisseo di Platone: uno ζήτημα omerico nell’Ippia Minore’, in Arrighetti, G. (ed.), Poesia greca. Pisa: Giardini: 9–57.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Godley, A. (1920) Herodotus, with an English Translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. and Manuwald, G. (eds. and trans.) (2018) Fragmentary Republican Latin, Volume I: Ennius, Testimonia. Epic Fragments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Golder, H. (1990) ‘Sophocles’ Ajax: Beyond the Shadow of Time’, in Ario, 3rd series (1): 9–34.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1984) Language, Sexuality, Narrative: The Oresteia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1990) ‘Supplication and Authorial Comment in Iliad Z 61–2’ in Hermes 118 (3): 373–6.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991) The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2001) (ed.) Being Greek under Rome. Cultural Identity, The Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002a) The Invention of Prose. Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics No. 32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002b) Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2015) ‘Preposterous Poetics and the Erotics of Death’ in Eugestea 5: 154–77.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (forthcoming a) ‘Latin on Greek’ in Whitton, C. and Gibson, R. (eds.) Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2020) Preposterous Poetics: The Ideology and Aesthetics of Form in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (forthcoming c) Playing God with Time.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (forthcoming d) ‘Homer and the Precarity of Tradition: Can Jesus be Achilles?’Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. and Greensmith, E. (forthcoming) in The Cambridge Classical Journal. ‘Gregory of Nazianzus and the Palatine Anthology: The Poetics of Christian Death’, in The Cambridge Classical Journal.Google Scholar
González, J. M. (2013) The Epic Rhapsode and His Craft: Homeric Performance in a Diachronic Perspective. Boston and London: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Gow, A. and Page, D. (1965) Hellenistic Epigrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gow, A. and Page, D. (eds. and trans.) (1968) The Greek Anthology: Garland of Philip and some Contemporary Epigrams. (2 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2002) Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, T. (1963) The Descent from Heaven: A Study in Epic Continuity. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E. (2018) ‘When Homer Quotes Callimachus: Allusive Poetics in the Proem of the Posthomerica’ in CQ 68 (1): 257–74.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E.: (forthcoming a) ‘Saying the Other: The Poetics of Personification in Later Antique Epic’, in Verhelst, B. and Scheijnen, T. (eds.) Walking the Wire: Greek and Latin Poetry in Dialogue.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E.: (forthcoming b) ‘The Wrath of the Sibyl: Homeric Reception and Contested Identities in the Sibylline Oracles 3’ in Konig, J. and Wiater, N. (eds.) Late Hellenistic Literature in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E.: (forthcoming c) ‘A-Sexual Epic? Consummation and Closure in the Posthomerica’ in Bär, S., Greensmith, E. and Ozbek, L. (eds.) Writing Homer under Rome: Quintus of Smyrna in and beyond the Second Sophistic.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E.: (forthcoming d) ‘The Miracle Baby. Zagreus and Nonnus’ Poetics of Mutation’ in Verhelst, B. (ed.) Nonnus of Panopolis in Context IV: Poetry at the Crossroads. Peeters: Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta (Bibliothèque de Byzantion).Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2014) ‘“Future Past”: Time and Teleology in (Ancient) Historiography’, in History and Theory 53 (3): 309–30.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2015) Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: “Futures Past” from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.) (2012) Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The ‘Plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grossardt, P. (ed. and trans.) (2006) Einführung, Übersetzung und Kommentar zum Heroikos von Flavius Philostrat. Basle: Schwabe AG Verlag.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (1985) Pausanias’ Guide to Ancient Greece. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Hadjittofi, F. (2007) ‘Res Romanae: Cultural Politics in Quintus and Nonnus’ in Baumbach and Bär (eds.): 357–78.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (ed. and trans. L. Coser) (1992) Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1988) Plato Republic Book 10: With Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2011) Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. (ed. and trans.) (2012) Callimachus Aetia Vol. 1: Introduction, Text and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. (ed. and trans.) (2012) Callimachus Aetia Vol. 2: Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. and Wakker, G. (1993) Callimachus (Hellenistica Groningana 1). Groningen: Egbert Forsten.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1997) ‘Closure in Latin Epic’ in Roberts, , Dunn, and Fowler, (eds.): 139–62.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2007) ‘Polyphony or Babel? Hosidius Geta’s ‘Medea’ and the poetics of the cento’ in Swain, , Harrison, and Elsner, (eds.): 168–76.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (1988) ‘Virgil on Kingship: The First Simile of the Aeneid’ in Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 34: 55–9.Google Scholar
Hartman, J. (2016) Allusion and Cultural Memory in Late Antiquity: Ausonius, Prudentius, and Claudian. PhD Diss. at the University of Washington.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. (1994) ‘The Homer ‘Lexicon of Apollonius Sophista: I. Composition and Constituents’ in Classical Philology 89 (1): 1–45.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. (1994) ‘The Homer Lexicon of Apollonius Sophista: II. Identity and Transmission’ in Classical Philology 89 (2): 107–19.Google Scholar
Hastrup, K. (1978) ‘The Semantics of Biology: Virginity’, in Ardener, S. (ed.), Defining Females: The Nature of Women in Society. London.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (1996) ‘Image, Text, and Story in the Recovery of Helen’ in Classical Antiquity 15 (1): 152–84.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time. A Translation of “Sein und Zeit”. Translated by Stambaugh, J. (7th ed.). Albany, New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hekster, O. (2008) Rome and Its Empire, AD 193–284. Debates and Documents in Ancient History. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Heseltine, M. (1975 rev. ed.) Petronius: Satyricon; Seneca: Apocolocyntosis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. (2006) ‘Homeric Flyting and How to Read It: Performance and Intratext in Iliad 20.83–109 and 20.178–258’ in Ramus 35: 4–28.Google Scholar
Hillgruber, M. (1994, 1999) Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero (2 vols.). Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hillgruber, M. (2000) ‘Homer im Dienste des Mimus. Zur künstlerischen Eigenart der Homeristen.’ in ZPE 132: 63–72.Google Scholar
Hilton, J. (2017) ‘Egyptian Necromancy in Heliodorus Aethiopica (6.12–15) and the Witch of Endor Narrative (1 Sam 28)’ in Evans, R. (ed.) Prophets and Profits: Ancient Divination and Its Reception. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (2014) ‘The Self-Conscious Cento’ in Formisano, M. and Fuhrer, T. (eds.) Decadence or “Other Antiquity”. Heidelberg: Winter: 171–98.Google Scholar
Hochschild, P. E. (2012) Memory in Augustine’s Theological Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, A. (1965) Homeric Modifications of Formulaic Prototypes: Studies in the Development of Greek Epic Diction. Amsterdam: Noord–Hollandsche Uitg.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, N. (1994a) ‘Nonnus and Homer’ in Hopkinson, (ed.) Studies in the Dionysiaca of Nonnus. Cambridge Philological Society: Supplementary volumes (17): 9–42.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, N. (ed.) (1994b) Greek Poetry of the Imperial Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, N. (ed. and trans.) (2018) Quintus Smyrnaeus Posthomerica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2015) Lykophron: Alexandra. Greek Text, Translation, Commentary, and Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1941) Literary Quotation and Allusion in Lucian. New York: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (1997) ‘Longus and Plato’ in Picone, M. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.) Der antike Roman und seine mittelalterliche Rezeption. Basle: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus. Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2009) ‘The Trojan Oration of Dio Chrysostom and Ancient Homeric Criticism’ in Grethlein, J. and A. Rengakos, (eds.), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature. Berlin: de Gruyter: 43–62.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2012a) ‘The Songs of Demodocus: Compression and Extension in Greek Narrative Poetry’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 81–109.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2012b) Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2014a) Hesiodic Voices. Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2014b) ‘The Rhetorical Criticism of Homer’ in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship: 673–705.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2015) ‘Eustathian Moments: Reading Eustathius’ Commentaries’ in Pontani, F., Katsaros, V. and Sarris, V. (eds.) Reading Eustathios of Thessalonike. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2016) ‘The Hippias Minor and the Traditions of Homeric Criticism’ in The Cambridge Classical Journal 62: 85–107.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. and Carvounis, K. (eds.) (2008) Signs of Life? Studies in Later Greek Poetry (Ramus 37.1 and 2).Google Scholar
Hunter, V. (1990) ‘Gossip and the Politics of Reputation in Classical Athens’ in Phoenix 44 (4): 299–325.Google Scholar
Hutton, P. (2000) ‘Recent Scholarship on Memory and History’ in The History Teacher 33 (4): 533–48.Google Scholar
James, A. (ed. and trans.) (2004) Quintus of Smyrna, The Trojan Epic. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
James, A. (2007) ‘Quintus of Smyrna and Virgil: a Matter of Prejudice’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 285–306.Google Scholar
James, A. and Lee, K. (2000) A Commentary on Quintus of Smyrna, Posthomerica V. Mnemosyne Supplement 208. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1991) Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. North Carolina: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. (1898) Sophocles: The Plays and Fragments with Critical Notes, Commentary and Translation in English Prose, Part IV: The Philoctetes (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. (1987) Momentary Monsters: Lucan and His Heroes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Joosten, J. (2001) ‘Tatian’s Diatessaron and the Old Testament Peshitta’ in Journal of Biblical Literature 120: 501–23.Google Scholar
Joosten, J. (2017) ‘Le Diatessaron syriaque’ in Haelewyck, J. (ed.) Le Nouveau Testament en syriaque. Paris: Geuthner: 55–66.Google Scholar
Jordanova, L. (1989) Sexual Visions: Images of Gender in Science and Medicine between the Eighteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kakridis, Ph. I. (1962) Κόιιντος Σμυρναῖος. Γενικὴ μελέτξ τῶν Μεθ’ Ὅμηρον καὶ τοῦ ποιητῆ τους. Athens.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A. (2007) ‘Christodoros on the Statues of the Zeuxippos Baths: A New Reading of the Ekphrasis.’ in GRBS 47: 361–83.Google Scholar
Kammen, M. (1991) Mystic Chords of Memory: The Transformation of Tradition in American Culture. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kauffman, N. (2018) ‘Slaughter and Spectacle in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’ in CQ 68 (2): 634–48.Google Scholar
Keaney, J. and Lamberton, R. (eds. and trans.) (1996) Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer (Plutarch). Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Keizer, H. (2010) Life Time Entirety. A Study of AION in Greek Literature and Philosophy, the Septuagint and Philo. PhD Diss. 1999, Amsterdam: published as ebook in 2010.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. (2009) ‘Parodic Inconsistency: Some Problems in the Batrakhomyomakhia’ in JHS 129: 45–51.Google Scholar
Kerkhecker, A. (1988) ‘Ein Musenanruf am Anfang der Aitia des Kallimachos’ in ZPE 71: 16–24.Google Scholar
Kessels, A. and Van Der Horst, P. (1987) ‘The Vision of Dorotheus: Edited with Introduction, Translation and Notes’ in Vigiliae Christianae 41,(4): 313–59.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010) Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. (1973) Homer in der zweiten Sophistik: Studien zu der Homerlektüre und dem Homerbild bei Dion von Prusa, Maximos von Tyros und Ailios Aristeides. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
King, K. C. (1987) Achilles. Paradigms of the War Hero from Homer to the Middle Ages. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. (1990) The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol II: Books 5–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitchen, J. (1998) Saints’ Lives and the Rhetoric of Gender: Male and Female in Merovingian Hagiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. (2007) ‘Fish in Battle? Quintus of Smyrna and the Halieutica of Oppian’, in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 285–306.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. (2020) Oppian’s Halieutica: Charting a Didactic Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. (2016) ‘Circling Time: Aion in Nonnus’ Dionysiaca’: paper given at The Society for Classical Studies 147th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 9 January 2016.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (ed.) (1995) Ovid. Heroides: Select Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge. University Press.Google Scholar
Köchly, H (1850) Quinti Smyrnaei Posthomericorum libri XIV. Relegit Armenius Koechly. Accedit index nominum a Francisco Spitznero confectus. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
König, J. (2005) Athletics and Literature in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. (2013) How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and Saïd, S. (eds.) (2006) Greeks on Greekness: Viewing the Greek Past under the Roman Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society (29).Google Scholar
Kraeling, C. (1935) A Greek Fragment of Tatian’s Diatessaron from Dura. Studies and Documents 3. London: Christophers.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1969) Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Translated by Roudiez, Leon. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kruchió, B. (2018) ‘Heliodorus’ Postsophistica: Homeric Intertextuality and Its Cultural Implications: paper given at the conference ‘Heliodorus in New Contexts’, Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge, 12 December 2018.Google Scholar
Lada–Richards, I. (2002) ‘The Subjectivity of Greek Performance’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.). Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 395–418.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. (1986) Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. (1997) ‘Modern Paroemiology and the Use of Gnomai in Homer’s Iliad’ in Classical Philology 92: 213–34.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Porter, Catherine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Layton, R. (2003) ‘Art and Agency: A Reassessment’ in The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (3): 447–64.Google Scholar
Lear, G. (2011) ‘Mimesis and Psychological Change in Republic III,’ in Destree, P., and Herrmann, F. (eds.), Plato and the Poets. Leiden: Brill: 195–216.Google Scholar
Lee, D. (1964) The Similes of the Iliad and Odyssey Compared. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, O. (1979) Fathers and Sons in Virgil’s Aeneid: tum genitor natum. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2006) ‘Statius and the Sublimity of Capaneus’ in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.) Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition, Presented to Jasper Griffin by Former Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 217–42.Google Scholar
Lelli, E. et al. (eds.) (2013) Quinto di Smirne: il seguito dell’Iliade di Omero. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. (2005) Soldiers and Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lévystone, D. (2005) ‘La figure d’Ulysse chez les Socratiques: Socrate polutropôs’ in Phronesis 50: 181–214.Google Scholar
Liebert, R. (2013) ‘Pity and Disgust in Plato’s Republic: The Case of Leontius’ in Classical Philology 108 (3) 179–201.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. (2007) The Sibylline Oracles: With Introduction, Translation, and Commentary on the First and Second Books. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Livrea, E. (2000) Nonno di Panopoli, Parafrasi del Vangelo di S. Giovanni, Canto B. Bologna: EDB.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (2013) ‘Split Screen Aficionados: Heracles on Top of Troy in the Casa di Octavius Quartio in Pompeii’ in Lovatt, H. and Vout, C. (eds.) Epic Visions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 218–47.Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. (2013) The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender and Narrative in Ancient Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, N. J. (2000) The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1984) ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Callimachus and l’art pour l’art’, in MD 12: 9–34.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1989) Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994) ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality. Catullus 66. 39–40 and Other Examples’ in Lyne, R.O.A.M. and Harrison, S. (eds.) R.O.A.M. Lyne: Collected Papers on Latin Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynn-George, M. (1988) Epos: Word, Narrative, and the Iliad. London: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2007) ‘The Worlds of Nestor the Poet’ in Swain, , Harrison, and Elsner, (eds.): 83–113.Google Scholar
Maas, M. (ed) (2005) The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2007) ‘Returning to the Mountain of Arete: Reading Ecphrasis, Constructing Ethics in Quintus’ Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 259–84.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2012a): ‘Representative Bees in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’ in Classical Philology 107 (1): 53–69.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2012b) Quintus Smyrnaeus’ ‘Posthomerica’: Engaging Homer in Late Antiquity. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2012c) ‘The Flyte of Odysseus: Allusion and the hoplōn krisis in Quintus Smyrnaeus, Posthomerica 5’ in AJPh 133.4: 601–28.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2017) ‘Netherworld Destinations in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica: Some (Homeric) Problems’, in Tanaseanu–Döbler, I., Lefteratou, A., Ryser, G. and Stamatopoulos, K. (eds.) Reading the Way to the Netherworld. Education and Representations of the Beyond in Later Antiquity. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht: 123–37.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2018) ‘Program and Poetics in Quintus of Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’ in Simms, R. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to Epic Continuations, Prequels and Sequels. Leiden: Brill: 71–89.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2020) ‘Triphiodorus and the Poetics of Imperial Greek Epic’, in Classical Philology 115 (2): 164–85.Google Scholar
Mackie, H. (1997) ‘Song and Storytelling: An Odyssean Perspective’ in TAPA 127 (7): 77–95.Google Scholar
Madden, E. (1952) ‘The Enthymeme: Crossroads of Logic, Rhetoric, and Metaphysics’ in The Philosophical Review 61 (3): 368–76.Google Scholar
Mair, A. (trans.) (1928) Oppian, Colluthus, Tryphiodorus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Malm, M. and Cullhed, S. (eds.) (2018) Reading Late Antiquity. The Library of the other Antiquity. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Mansur, M. W. (1940) The Treatment of Homeric Characters by Quintus of Smyrna. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Maronitis, D. (1973) Aναζήτηση και νόστος του Οδυσσεά: η διαλεκτική της Οδύσσειας. Athens: Papazēsē.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1989) The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1993) Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masters, J. (1992) Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge: Cambridge Classical Studies.Google Scholar
McAuley, M. (2016) Reproducing Rome: Motherhood in Virgil, Ovid, Seneca and Statius. Oxford Studies in Classical Literature and Gender Theory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMillin, T. (2000) Our Preposterous Use of Literature: Emerson and the Nature of Reading. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Merkle, S. (1994) ‘Telling the True Story of the Trojan War: the Eyewitness Account of Dictys of Crete’, in Tatum, J. (ed.) The Search for the Ancient Novel. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press: 183–98.Google Scholar
Middleton, F. (2019) ‘The Poetics of Later Greek Ecphrasis: Christodorus Coptus, the Palatine Anthology and the Periochae of Nonnus’ Dionysiaca’, Ramus 47, 216–38.Google Scholar
Miguélez Cavero, L. (2008) Poems in Context: Greek Poetry in the Egyptian Thebaid 200–600 AD. Sozomena. Studies in the Recovery of Ancient Texts 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miguélez Cavero, L. (2013) Triphiodorus, The Sack of Troy: A General Introduction and a Commentary. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1993) ‘Ovidian Allusion and the Vocabulary of Memory’ in MD 30: 153–74.Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2000) ‘Achilles, Patroclus and Parental Care in Some Homeric Similes’ in Greece & Rome 47 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. (1987) ‘Imperial Building in the Eastern Roman Provinces’ in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 91: 333–65.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. (2011) From Villain to Hero: Odysseus in Ancient Thought. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Morales, H. (2000) ‘Sense and Sententiousness in the Ancient Greek Novels’ in Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 67–88.Google Scholar
Morales, H. (2004) Vision and Narrative in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morales, H. (2016) ‘Rape, Violence, Complicity: Colluthus’s Abduction of Helen’ in Arethusa 49.1: 61–92.Google Scholar
Moret, J. M. (1975) Ilioupersis dans la céramique italiote: Les mythes et leur expression figurée au IVe siècle. Rome: Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (1998) Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moret, J. M. (2007) Popular Morality in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Most, G. (trans.) (2007) Hesiod: Theogony, Works and Days, Testimonia, vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mullen, A. and James, P. (eds.) (2012) Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mullen, A and Elder, O. (eds.) (2019) The Language of Letters: Bilingual Roman Epistolography from Cicero to Fronto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, A. (1919) Homer Iliad 1–12 (vol. 1) and 13–24 (vol. 2). Revised by Wyatt, W. 1999. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, A. (revised by Dimock, G.) (1998) Homer Odyssey Vols. 1 & 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Naddaff, R. (2002) Exiling the Poets: The Production of Censorship in Plato’s Republic. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1996) Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1997) ‘Homeric Scholia’ in Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.) A New Companion to Homer. Leiden: Brill: 101–22.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1982) ‘Plato on Imitation and Poetry in Republic 10’ in Moravcsik, J., and Temko, P. (eds.) Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield: 47–78.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. (2007) ‘Art at the Crossroads? Themes and Style in Severan Art’ in Swain, , Harrison, and Elsner, (eds.): 201–49.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2014) Reading Fiction with Lucian. Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009a) ‘Narratological Concepts in Greek Scholia’ in Grethlein, and Rengakos, (eds.): 63–86.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009b) The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ojeda, E. J. L. (2002) La adjetivación en las Dionisíacas de Nono de Panópolis: tradición e innovación. Hapax absolutos y no absolutos. PhD. Diss. at the University of Málaga.Google Scholar
Ozbek, L. (2007) ‘Ripresa della tradizione e innovazione compositiva: la medicina nei Posthomerica di Quinto Smirneo’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 159–83.Google Scholar
Pappas, N. (2017) ‘Plato’s Aesthetics’ in Zalda, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 ed.).Google Scholar
Paratore, E. (1976) ‘Il problema degli pseudepigrapha’ in Romane Litterae (reprinted from 1971). Rome: 5–32.Google Scholar
Parker, D., Taylor, D. and Goodacre, M (eds.) (1999) ‘The Dura-Europos Gospel Harmony’ in Taylor, D. G. K. (ed.) Studies in the Early Text of the Gospels and Acts. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature: 192–228.Google Scholar
Parker, P. (1987) Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property. London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Parry, A. (ed.) (1971) The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. (ed.) (1983) The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, L. London: Egypt Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. (2012) ‘Homer: Papyri and Performance’ in Bastianini, G. and Casaova, A. (eds.) I papyri omerici. Atti del convengo internazionale di studi. Florence: Istituto papirologico.Google Scholar
Paschal, G. W. (1904) A Study in Quintus of Smyrna. Diss. at the University of Columbia.Google Scholar
Paton, W. (trans.) (1918) The Greek Anthology (5 vols.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pavese, C. O. (1998) ‘The Rhapsodic Epic Poems as Oral and Independent Poems’ in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98: 63–90.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2012) The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2006) ‘Herodotus and Homer’ in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F. and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffien by Former Pupils, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 75–104.Google Scholar
Pelttari, A. (2014) The Space That Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, L. and Salzman-Mitchell, P. (eds.) (2012). Mothering and Motherhood in Ancient Greece and Rome. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, W. (1994) Tatian’s Diatessaron. Its Creation, Dissemination, Significance and History in Scholarship, Vigiliae Christianae Supplement 25. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Petrain, D. (2014) Homer in Stone: The ‘Tabulae Iliacae’ in their Roman Context. Greek Culture in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Plooij, D. (1934/1935) “A Fragment of Tatian’s Diatessaron in Greek,” in ExpTim 46: 471–6.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. (2005) Sguardi su Ulisse. La tradizione esegetica greca all’Odissea. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. (ed.) (2007) Scholia graeca in Odysseam. Pleiadi : 6. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2010) The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, S. (2013) ‘What Can We Learn about Greek Grammar from a Mosaic’? in Porter, S. and Pitts, A. (eds.) The Language of the New Testament: Context, History and Development. Leiden: Brill: 29–41.Google Scholar
Postclassicisms Collective (2020) Postclassicisms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1970) The Art of Vergil. Translated by Seligson, G. M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. (2007) ‘The Parental Ethos of the Iliad’ in Hesperia Supplements 41 (Constructions of Childhood in Ancient Greece and Italy): 24–40.Google Scholar
Prendergast, C. (2019) Counterfactuals: Paths of the Might Have Been. London; New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pucci, J. (1998) The Full Knowing Reader. Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Purves, A. (2010) Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (2018) Virgil’s Double Cross: Design and Meaning in the Aeneid. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rea, J. (1972) ‘Triphiodorus, Fall of Troy, 391–402’ in POxy. 46: 9–10 [publication of POxy. 2946].Google Scholar
Reader, W. W. (ed.) (1996) The Severed Hand and the Upright Corpse: The Declamations of Marcus Antonius Polemo. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. (1973) ‘The Making of the Odyssey’ in Yu, A. (ed.) Parnassus Revisited: Modern Critical Essays on the Epic Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 141–54.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. (1975) Nature and Culture in the Iliad: the Tragedy of Hector. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Remijsen, S. (2015) The End of Greek Athletics in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. (1993) Der Homertext und Die Hellenistischen Dichter. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. (1994) Apollonios Rhodios und die antike Homererklärung. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1993) The Iliad. A Commentary, vol. VI, books 21–4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, D. and Johnson, A. (eds.) (2017) The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1970) Freud and Philosophy: An Essay in Interpretation. Translated by Savage, D.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1984), Time and Narrative, Vol. I. Translated by McLaughlin, K. and Pellauer, D.. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (1989) The Jeweled Style: Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (2005) ‘Statius, Domitian and Acknowledging Paternity: Rituals of Succession in the Thebaid’ in Nauta, R. R., Dam, H. and Smolenaars, J. J. L. (eds.) The Poetry of Statius. Leiden: Brill: 175–94.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. (1992) The Poetics of Imitation: Anacreon and the Anacreontic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roueché, C. (1993) Performers and Partisans at Aphrodisias in the Roman and Late Roman Periods. A Study based on Inscriptions from the Current Excavations at Aphrodisias in Caria. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Rousso, H. (1991) The Vichy Syndrome: History and Memory in France since 1944. Translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, G. (1966) ‘The Portrait of Aeschines in the Oration on the Crown’ in TAPA 97: 397–406.Google Scholar
Russell, D. (2001) (ed. and trans.) (2001) Quintilian, The Orator’s Education (5 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rüter, K. (1969) Odysseeinterpretationen. Untersuchungen zum ersten Buch und zur Phaiakis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck u. Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Sammons, B. (2010) The Art and Rhetoric of the Homeric Catalogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sammons, B. (2017) Device and Composition in the Greek Epic Cycle. Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Ostiz, A. (2013) ‘Cicero Graecus: Notes on Ciceronian Papyri from Egypt’ in ZPE 187: 144–53.Google Scholar
Sandnes, K. (2011) The Gospel ‘According to Homer and Virgil’: Cento and Canon. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schechner, R. (1985) Between Theater and Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Scheijnen, T. (2018) Quintus of Smyrna’s Posthomerica: A Study of Heroic Characterization and Heroism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schenk, P. (1997) ‘Handlungsstruktur und Komposition in den Posthomerica des Quintus Smyrnaeus’ in RhM 140: 363–85.Google Scholar
Schmid, U. (2013) ‘Tatian’s Diatessaron’ in Ehrman, B., Holmes, M. (eds.), The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, 2nd ed., Leiden: Brill: 115–42.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. and Fleury, P. (eds.) (2011) Perceptions of the Second Sophistic and Its Times. Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (1997) Bildung und Macht. Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (1999) ‘Performing History in the Second Sophistic’ in Zimmermann, M. (ed.) Geschichtsschreibung und politischer Wandel im 3. Jh. N. Chr. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (2007a) Modern Literary Theory and Ancient Texts. An Introduction. Translation of 2002 German edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. (2007b) ‘The Use of Analepses and Prolepses in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 65–84.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. and Wiater, N. (eds.) (2011) The Struggle for Identity: Greeks and Their Past in the First Century BCE. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Scott, W. (2009) The Artistry of the Homeric Simile. Dartmouth: Dartmouth College Press.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1982) Dionysiac Poetics and Euripides’ Bacchae. Princeton, University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1994) Singers, Heroes and Gods in the Odyssey. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sens, A. (2006) ‘Tipte genos toumon zeteis? The Batrachomyomachia, Hellenistic Epic Parody and Early Epic’ in Montanari, F. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) La Poésie Epique Grecque. Geneva: 215–48.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2003) Statius. Vol. 2: Thebaid, Books 1–7; Vol. 3: Books 8–12. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shorrock, R. (2001) The Challenge of Epic: Allusive Engagement in the Dionysiaca of Nonnus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Shorrock, R. (2008) ‘The Politics of Poetics: Nonnus’ Dionysiaca and the World of Late Antiquity’ in Carvounis, and Hunter, (eds.): 99–113.Google Scholar
Shorrock, R. (2011) The Myth of Paganism: Nonnus, Dionysus and the World of Late Antiquity. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Snell, R. and Kannicht, S. (eds.) (1986) Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, I2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Sörbom, G. (1966) Mimesis and Art. Studies in the Origin and Early Development of an Aesthetic Vocabulary. Stockholm: Scandinavian University Books.Google Scholar
Sowers, B. (2020) In Her Own Words: The Life and Poetry of Aelia Eudocia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Snipes, K. (1988) ‘Literary Interpretation in the Homeric Scholia: The Similes of the Iliad’ in AJPh 109: 196–222.Google Scholar
Spanoudakis, K. (2014a) (ed.) Nonnus of Panopolis in Context: Poetry and Cultural Milieu in Late Antiquity with a Section on Nonnus and the Modern World. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Spanoudakis, K. (2014b) (ed.) Nonnus of Panopolis Paraphrasis of the Gospel of John XI. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. (1989) ‘Agonistic Festivals in Roman Greece’ in Bulletin Supplement (University of London. Institute of Classical Studies) 55: ‘The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire: Papers from the Tenth British Museum Classical Colloquium’: 193–7.Google Scholar
Speyer, W. (1971) Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum. Ein Versuch ihrer Deutung. Munich, C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2011) The Iliad in a Nutshell: Visualizing Epic on the Tabulae Iliacae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2014) ‘The Ordo of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Order’, in Meyer, M. and Elsner, J. (eds.) Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 353–417.Google Scholar
Stanford, W. (1950) ‘Homer’s Use of Personal πολυ–Compounds’ in Classical Philology 45: 108–10.Google Scholar
Stefanou, D. (2006) Darstellungen aus dem Epos und Drama auf kaiserzeitlichen und spätantiken Bodenmosaiken. Eine ikonographische und deutungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Munster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Stegemann, V. (1930) Astrologie und Universalgeschicthe: Studien und Interpretationen zu den Dionysiaka des Nonnos von Panopolis. Leipzig: Berlin.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (ed.) (2001) Unmasked Performances: Staging Identities in Greece and Rome (Helios 28.1).Google Scholar
Strauss Clay, J. (1983) The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strenger, J. (2004) Poetische Argumentation. Die Funktion der Gnomik in den Epinikien des Bakchylides. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1991) ‘The Reliability of Philostratus’s “Lives of the Sophists”’ in Classical Antiquity 10 (1): 148–63.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World AD 50–250. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Swain, S., Harrison, S. and Elsner, J. (eds.) (2007) Severan Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1989) ‘The Reader as Author: Collaborative Interpolation in Latin Poetry’ in Grant, J. N. (ed.) Editing Greek and Latin Texts. New York: 121–62.Google Scholar
Teske, R. (2001) ‘Augustine’s Philosophy of Memory’ in Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 148–58.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. (1984) Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Poetry. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tipping, B. (2010) Exemplary Epic: Silius Italicus’ Punica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tissoni, F. (2016) ‘The Reception of Nonnus in Late Antiquity, Byzantine and Renaissance Literature’ in Accorinti, (ed.): 671–91.Google Scholar
Tomasso, V. E. (2010) ‘Cast in Later Grecian Mould’, Quintus of Smyrna’s Reception of Homer in the Posthomerica. Diss. at the University of Stanford.Google Scholar
Tomasso, V. E. (2012) ‘The Fast and the Furious: Triphiodorus’ Reception of Homer in The Capture of Troy’ in Baumbach, and Bär, (eds.): 369–409.Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. C. (2007) The Oral Palimpsest: Exploring Intertextuality in the Homeric Epics. Washington and London: Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University.Google Scholar
Tsagarakis, O. (1979) ‘Phoenix’s Social Status and the Achaean Embassy’ in Mnemosyne, 32: 221–42.Google Scholar
Usher, M. (1998) Homeric Stitchings: The Homeric Centos of the Empress Eudocia. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Van der Valk, M. (ed.) (1971) Eustathii Archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem Pertinentes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van Tress, H. (2004) Poetic Memory: Allusion in the Poetry of Callimachus and the Metamorphoses of Ovid. Leiden: Brill (Mnemosyne Supplement 258).Google Scholar
Vanacker, W. and Zuiderhoek, A. (eds.) (2017) Imperial Identities in the Roman World. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verhelst, B. and Scheijnen, T. (eds.) (forthcoming) Walking the Wire: Greek and Latin Poetry in Dialogue.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. (1980) Myth and Society in Ancient Greece. Translated by Lloyd, Janet. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (1959) Recherches sur les ‘Posthomerica’ de Quintus de Smyrne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (ed. and trans.) (1963) Quintus de Smyrne, ‘La suite d’Homère’. Tome 1. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (ed. and trans.) (1966) Quintus de Smyrne, ‘La suite d’Homère’. Tome 2. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (ed. and trans.) (1969) Quintus de Smyrne, ‘La suite d’Homère’. Tome 3. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (1976) Nonnos de Panopolis. Les Dionysiaques. Tome 1. Chants 1–2. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (1994) ‘Théogamies et sotériologie dans les Dionysiaques de Nonnos’ in JSav: 197–233.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (2001) ‘Echoes and Imitations of Apollonius Rhodius in Late Greek Epic’ in Papanghelis, Th. D. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) A Companion to Apollonius Rhodius. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vian, F. and Battegay, E. (1984) Lexique de Quintus de Smyrne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. (1992) Assassins of Memory: Essays on the Denial of the Holocaust. Translated by Mehlman, Jeffrey. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Visser, E. (1987) Homerische Versifikationstechnik: Versuch einer Rekonstruktion. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vivante, P. (1982) The Epithets in Homer: A Study in Poetic Values. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Von Möllendorff, P. (2016) Review of ní Mheallaigh (2014) in Mnemosyne 69 (6): 1059–69.Google Scholar
Von Reden, S. and Goldhill, S. (1999) ‘Plato and the Performance of Dialogue’ in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.) Performance Culture and Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 267–92.Google Scholar
Vout, C. (2007) Power and Eroticism in Imperial Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wachtel, N. (1986) ‘Memory and History: An Introduction’ in History and Anthropology 2: 207–24.Google Scholar
Walz, C. (ed.) (1832) Rhetores Graeci, vol. I. Stuttgart and London: J.G. Cotta and Black, Young & Young.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1996) The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and Their Successors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (2018) ‘Antique Authority’ in Bryan, J., Wardy, R. and Warren, J. (eds.) Authors and Authority in Ancient Philosophy: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 313–29.Google Scholar
Watson, F. (2013) ‘Harmony or Gospel? On the Genre of the (so-called) Diatessaron’. SNTS Christian Apocryphal Literature Seminar, Perth.Google Scholar
Way, A. S. (trans.) (1913) Quintus Smyrnaeus: The Fall of Troy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2006) ‘Fiction, Mimesis and the Performance of the Past in the Second Sophistic’ in Konstan, and Saïd, (eds.): 27–46.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2008) Demons and Dancers. Performance in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (1989) ‘Aristotle on Inferences from Signs (Rhetoric I 2, 1357b1–25)’ in Phronesis 34: 343–51.Google Scholar
Wenglinsky, M. H. (1999) ‘Response to the Philological Criticism of the Portrayal of the Gods: The Posthomerica of Quintus of Smyrna’ in Ancient Philosophy 19: 77–86.Google Scholar
Wenglinsky, M. H. (2002) The Representation of the Divine in the Posthomerica of Quintus of Smyrna. Diss. at the University of Columbia.Google Scholar
West, M. (2003a) (trans) Homeric Hymns. Homeric Apocrypha. Lives of Homer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, M. (2003b) (trans) Greek Epic Fragments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, M. (2013) The Epic Cycle: A Commentary on the Lost Trojan Epics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitby, M. (1994) ‘From Moschus to Nonnus: The Evolution of the Nonnian Style’ in Hopkinson, (ed.): 99–154.Google Scholar
Whitby, M. (2017) ‘Christodorus of Coptus on the Statues in the Baths of Zeuxippus at Constantinople. Text and Context’ in Bannert, H. and Kröll, H. (eds.) Nonnus of Panopolis in Context II: Poetry, Religion, and Society. Leiden: Brill (Mnemosyne Supplement 408): 271–88.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. (1958) Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2007) ‘Prose Literature and the Severan Dynasty’ in Swain, , Harrison, and Elsner, (eds.): 29–51.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2013) Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2015) ‘The Mnemology of Empire and Resistance: Memory, Oblivion, and Periegesis in Imperial Greek Culture’ in Galinsky, K. and Lapatin, K. (eds.) Cultural Memories in the Roman Empire. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum: 49–65.Google Scholar
Wiemken, H. (1972) Der griechische Mimus: Dokumente zur Geschichte des antiken Volkstheaters. Bremen: Carl Schünemann Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1983) Technique and Ideas in the Aeneid. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wills, J. (1997) ‘Homeric and Virgilian Doublets: The Case of Aeneid 6.901’ in Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 38: 185–202.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (ed.) (2014) Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2001) ‘This Voice Which Is Not One: Helen’s Verbal Guises in Homeric Epic’ in Lardinois, A. and McClure, L. (eds.) Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 19–37.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1985) ‘Playing the Other: Theater, Theatricality and the Feminine in Greek Drama’, in Representations 11: 63–94.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1996) Playing the Other. Essays on Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (2001) ‘Visions and Revisions of Homer’ in Goldhill, S. (ed.) Being Greek under Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 195–268.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1988) ‘Aion Plutonios (Eine Gründungslegende von Alexandria)’ in Hermes 116: 291–303.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1989) Aion, Gott des Römerreichs (Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse). Heidelberg: Winter-Verlag.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1992) AIWN in der Literatur der Kaiserzeit (Wiener Studien Beihefte 17, Arbeiten zur antiken Religionsgeschichte 2). Vienna: VÖAW.Google Scholar