Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
- PREFACE
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Mechanisms and Process
- 3 Lithuania, 1940–1941
- 4 Rebellion in an Urban Community: The Role of Leadership and Centralization
- 5 The German Occupation of Lithuania
- 6 Postwar Lithuania
- 7 More Cases, More Comparisons
- 8 Resistance in the Perestroika Period
- 9 Fanatics and First Actors
- 10 Conclusions
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- INDEX
2 - Mechanisms and Process
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
- PREFACE
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Mechanisms and Process
- 3 Lithuania, 1940–1941
- 4 Rebellion in an Urban Community: The Role of Leadership and Centralization
- 5 The German Occupation of Lithuania
- 6 Postwar Lithuania
- 7 More Cases, More Comparisons
- 8 Resistance in the Perestroika Period
- 9 Fanatics and First Actors
- 10 Conclusions
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- INDEX
Summary
As outlined in the previous chapter, rebellions against strong regimes generally involve multiple stages. Correspondingly, rebellions necessitate multiple mechanisms that serve to drive individuals from one stage to the next as well as mechanisms that sustain action in vital roles. This chapter provides a detailed description of three sets of interconnected mechanisms crucial for initiating and sustaining rebellion:
Mechanisms driving movement from neutrality to widespread, but unorganized and unarmed, resistance (0 to +1).
Mechanisms driving movement to locally organized and armed rebellion (+1 to +2).
Mechanisms sustaining locally organized rebellion (maintaining action at +2).
From Neutrality to Widespread, Unarmed, and Unorganized Resistance
Some of the actions that characterize +1 behavior include writing antiregime graffiti, singing nationalist songs on buses, handing out or accepting antiregime literature, boycotting elections, and participating in “spontaneous” demonstrations. The significance of these actions is that they are public manifestations of antiregime sentiment, and, as each involves the possibility of sanction, they serve as public indicators of the number of risk accepters in the general populace and the amount of risk they will incur. In Chairman Mao's terms, +1 actions indicate to potential rebels within the general population, as well as organizers, that there is a “sea” for rebel “fish” to swim in.
Why would any individual accept even a small risk to perform an action that has only an extremely small effect on any outcome? One response might be that the movement from 0 to +1 is not strategic and does not involve calculation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Resistance and RebellionLessons from Eastern Europe, pp. 32 - 79Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001