Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:05:29.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

On Not Being a Very Punctual Subject: Rochester and the Invention of Modernity

from Form and Intellect

Nick Davis
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Edward Burns
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access

Summary

Rochester's slightly older contemporary, Antony à Wood, makes a distinctive claim about Rochester's commitment to study of the classics:

He was a person of most rare parts, and his natural talent was excellent, much improved by learning and industry, being thoroughly acquainted with the classic authors, both Greek and Latin; a thing very rare (if not peculiar to him) among those of his quality.

Samuel Johnson, coming across the claim in Wood's standard reference work and feeling obliged to do something with it, has recourse to sarcasm: ‘He read what is considered as polite learning so much, that he is mentioned by Wood as the greatest scholar of all the nobility’. It is instructive to assess the damage that would be done to Johnson's case against Rochester if Johnson were obliged to concede that, even in this one instance, Rochester might have been capable of defining and sustaining a valid intellectual project (Johnson characterizes Rochester's life as a series of moral and intellectual evasions). Nevertheless, the judgement of Rochester that Wood's testimony implies may be the more accurate of the two. As I shall try to show, Rochester engaged in—consistently and in all earnestness, if by unorthodox means—some of the more important debates of his time, and ones that have considerable modern resonance. His poetic writing, while not for the most part philosophical in the usual sense, is notable for its capacity to make intellectual ‘clearings’, or broach areas of perception where reflective thought is called into play.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reading Rochester , pp. 114 - 136
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×