Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:47:58.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Protective measurement and the PBR theorem

from Part II - Meanings and implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

By
Guy Hetzroni  and
Daniel Rohrlich
Edited by
Shan Gao
Guy Hetzroni
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Daniel Rohrlich
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Shan Gao
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

Protective measurements illustrate how Yakir Aharonov's fundamental insights into quantum theory yield new experimental paradigms that allow us to test quantum mechanics in ways that were not possible before. As for quantum theory itself, protective measurements demonstrate that a quantum state describes a single system, not only an ensemble of systems, and reveal a rich ontology in the quantum state of a single system. We discuss in what sense protective measurements anticipate the theorem of Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph (PBR), stating that, if quantum predictions are correct, then two distinct quantum states cannot represent the same physical reality.

Introduction

Although protective measurements [1, 2] are a new tool for quantum theory and experiment, they have yet to find their way into the laboratory; also theorists have not put them to best use, beyond a 1993 paper by Anandan on “Protective measurement and quantum reality” [3]. In Section 10.2, we point out that protective measurements offer new experimental tests of quantum mechanics, and we review recent experiments attempting to measure quantum wave functions. In Section 10.3, we present the Pusey–Barrett–Rudolph (PBR) theorem and discuss their conclusion that the quantum state represents physical reality, and in Section 10.4, we discuss in what sense protective measurements anticipate this conclusion.

Protective measurement: implications for experiment and theory

In 1926, Schrödinger postulated his equation for “material waves” in analogy with light waves: paths of material particles – which obey the principle of least action – are an approximation to material waves, just as rays of light – which obey the principle of least time – are an approximation to light waves [4]. But Born soon discarded “the physical pictures of Schr00F6;dinger” [5] and gave the “material wave” Ψ(x, t) a new interpretation: |Ψ(x, t)|2 is the probability density to find a particle at x at time t. Even Schrödinger was obliged to accept Born's interpretation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Protective Measurement and Quantum Reality
Towards a New Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
 , pp. 135 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Y., Aharonov and L., Vaidman, Measurement of the Schrödinger wave of a single particle, Phys. Lett. A178, 38 (1993).Google Scholar
[2] Y., Aharonov, J., Anandan and L., Vaidman, Meaning of the wave function, Phys. Rev. A47, 4616(1993).Google Scholar
[3] J., Anandan, Protective measurement and quantum reality, Found. Phys. Lett. 6 (1993).Google Scholar
[4] E., Schröidinger, Science, Theory and Man (London: Allen and Unwin), 1957, p. 177.
[5] M., Born, Zur Wellenmechanik der Stossvorgänge, Gött. Nachr. (1926), 146, cited and trans. in A., Pais, Niels Bohr's Times: in Physics, Philosophy and Polity (New York: Oxford University Press), 1991, p. 286.Google Scholar
[6] Y., Aharonov and D., Rohrlich, Quantum Paradoxes: Quantum Theory for the Perplexed (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH), 2005, Chapter 15.
[7] J. S., Lundeen, B., Sutherland, A., Pater, C., Stewart and C., Bamber. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction, Nature 474, 188 (2011).Google Scholar
[8] J. S., Lundeen and C., Bamber, Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070402 (2012).Google Scholar
[9] Y., Aharonov, D. Z., Albert and L., Vaidman, How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-½ particle can turn out to be 100, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988); see also Y., Aharonov and D., Rohrlich, [6], Chapters 16–17.Google Scholar
[10] Y., Aharonov, private communication.
[11] A. S., Stodolna, A., Rouzée, F., Lépine et al., Hydrogen atoms under magnification: direct observation of the nodal structure of Stark states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213001 (2013).Google Scholar
[12] S., Cohen, M. M., Marb, A., Ollagnier et al., Wave function microscopy of quasibound atomic states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 183001 (2013).Google Scholar
[13] D., Luftner, T., Ulesa, E. M., Reinisch et al., Imaging the wave function of adsorbed molecules, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA), doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315716110 (2013).Google Scholar
[14] W., Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy: the Revolution in Modern Science (New York: Harper and Row), 1958, p. 54.
[15] J. B., Hartle, Quantum mechanics of individual systems, Am.J.Phys. 36, 704 (1968).Google Scholar
[16] N., Harrigan and R. W., Spekkens, Einstein, incompleteness, and the espistemic view of quantum state, Found. Phys. 40, 125 (2010).Google Scholar
[17] A., Einstein, B., Podolsky and N., Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935), reprinted in Quantum Theory and Measurement, eds. J. A., Wheeler and W., Zurek (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 1983, pp. 138–141.
[18] N., Bohr, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935), reprinted in J. A., Wheeler and W., Zurek, (see [17]), pp. 145–151.Google Scholar
[19] M. F., Pusey, J., Barrett and T., Rudolph, On the reality of the quantum state, Nature Phys. 8, 475 (2012).Google Scholar
[20] J., Barrett, E. G., Cavalcanti, R., Lal and O.J. E., Maroney, No ψ-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantumm state, arXiv:1310.8302v1 (2013), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 250403 (2014).Google Scholar
[21] P. G., Lewis, D., Jennings, J., Barrett and T., Rudolph, Distinct quantum states can be compatible with a single state of reality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150404 (2012).Google Scholar
[22] J. S., Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).
[23] J. F., Clauser, M. A., Horne, A., Shimony and R. A., Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).Google Scholar
[24] L. E., Ballentine, The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 358 (1970).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×