Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T17:54:51.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The Metaphysics of Divine Presence and the Appropriateness of Worship

from Part IV - Forms and Functions of Worship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Aaron Segal
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Samuel Lebens
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

Acts of worship typically involve expressions of fealty: One takes off one’s shoes, bows low, or falls on one’s face. Experiences that naturally prompt such expressions – the sense that one is in the presence of God in an unusual and profound way – raise interesting metaphysical questions about divine presence and absence. Talk of special divine presence poses serious puzzles. In the Jewish scriptures – and in the writings and words of those who treat these scriptures with reverence, whatever their religion – there is much talk of God’s presence and of God’s absence. And yet, God is also affirmed to be everywhere. How can God be everywhere, but also absent from some places, and especially present in others? Metaphysics is a likely place to look for a range of possible answers to this simple but puzzling question.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Philosophy of Worship
Divine and Human Aspects
, pp. 296 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, H. B. (1921). Worship (Primitive), in: Hastings, J. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of religion and ethics. T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh, pp. 752757.Google Scholar
Allen, W. (2021). Thinking about good and evil: Jewish views from antiquity to modernity. The Jewish Publication Society, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcadi, J. M. (2017). Divine presence as divine action: applying Old Testament theophanies to contemporary worship. Topoi 36, 631639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arntzenius, F. (2004). Gunk, topology and measure, in: Zimmerman, D. (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaphysics: volume 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 225247.Google Scholar
Berkovits, E. (1973). Faith after the holocaust. Ktav Pub. House, New York.Google Scholar
Berkovits, E. (1975). Major themes in modern philosophies of Judaism. Ktav Pub. House, New York.Google Scholar
Berkovits, E. (2004). God, man and history, 4th edition. Shalem Press, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Choo, F. (2020). Can a worship-worthy agent command others to worship it? Religious Studies 58, 7995. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. J. (2011). How personal agents are located in space: implications for worship, Eucharist, and union with Christ. Philosophia Christi 13, 437444. https://doi.org/10.5840/pc201113237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dees, M. (forthcoming). Spacetime functionalism. Dialectica.Google Scholar
Ducasse, C. J. (1951). Nature, mind, and death. Open Court, La Salle, Ill.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (1808). The doctrine of original sin defended: evidences of its truth produced, and arguments to the contrary answered. Containing in particular, a reply to the objections and arguings of Dr. John Taylor, in his book intitled, “The scripture doctrine of original sin proposed to free and candid examination,” &c. Isaiah Thomas, Jr., England.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. R. (2018). Rethinking divine spatiality: divine omnipresence in philosophical and theological perspective. Heythrop Journal 59, 534543. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goris, H. (2009). Divine omnipresence in Thomas Aquinas, in: Goris, H., Rikhof, H., Schoot, H. (Eds.), Divine transcendence and immanence in the work of Thomas Aquinas. Peeters, Leuven, pp. 3758.Google Scholar
Hazony, D. (2013). The man who saved God from the Holocaust. Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies 31, 5473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, J., Rosenkrantz, G. S. (2002). The divine attributes. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, J. (2022). God spatially above and spatially extended: the rationality of Ibn Taymiyya’s refutation of Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Ašʿarī incorporealism. Arabica 69, 626674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, H. (2005). The metaphysics of hyperspace. Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, H. (2009). Omnipresence, in: Flint, T. P., Rea, M. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 199216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inman, R. (2017). Omnipresence and the location of the immaterial, in: Kvanvig, J. L. (Ed.), Oxford studies in philosophy of religion: volume 8. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 168206. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198806967.003.0008Google Scholar
Inman, R. (2021). Retrieving divine immensity and omnipresence, in: Arcadi, J. M., Turner, J. T. Jr. (Eds.), T&T Clark handbook of analytic theology. T. & T. Clark, London, pp. 127139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irgas, Y. (2015). Shomer Emunim: extracts translated into English, in: Fraenkel, A. (Ed.), Nefesh HaTzimtzum. Urim, Jerusalem and New York, pp. 228250.Google Scholar
Jedwab, J. (2016). God’s omnipresence. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8, 129149. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i2.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinschmidt, S. (2015). Shaping up location: against the Humean argument for the extrinsicality of shape. Philosophical Studies 172, 19731983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–014-0382-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebens, S. (2020). The principles of Judaism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhrmann, T. M. (2012). When God talks back: understanding the American evangelical relationship with God. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
Markosian, N. (2014). A spatial approach to mereology, in: Kleinschmidt, S. (Ed.), Mereology and location. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 6990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, K. (2007). Extended simples. Philosophical Studies 133, 131141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–006-9010-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, B. (2021). Inaugurated hyperspace. Theologica 1, 122.Google Scholar
Parsons, J. (2007). Theories of location, in: Zimmerman, D. (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaphysics: volume 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 201232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, R. (2011). Metaphysical themes 1274–1671. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567911.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2004). Supralapsarianism, or “O felix culpa,” in: van Inwagen, P. (Ed.), Christian faith and the problem of evil. Wm. B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, pp. 125.Google Scholar
Pruss, A. R. (2013). Omnipresence, multilocation, the real presence and time travel. Journal of Analytic Theology 1, 6073. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2013-1Google Scholar
Rachels, J. (1971). God and human attitudes. Religious Studies 7, 325337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500000391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skow, B. (2007). Are shapes intrinsic? Philosophical Studies 133, 111130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098–006-9009-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. (2013). Kant’s picture of monads in the Physical Monadology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 44, 102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, E. (2010). Wandering in darkness narrative and the problem of suffering. Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. (1977). The coherence of theism. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tracy, T. F. (2008). Theologies of divine action. In Clayton, P. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of religion and science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 596611. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199543656.003.0036Google Scholar
Tworek, W. (2019). Eternity now: Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liady and temporality. State University of New York Press, Albany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (1988). The place of chance in a world sustained by God, in: Morris, T. (Ed.), Divine and Human Action. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 211–35.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (2024). Improvable creations. TheoLogica 8. https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v8i2.78723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, E. (2003). Forces and causes in Kant’s early pre-Critical writings. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 34, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039–3681(02)00091-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierenga, E. (2008). Omnipresence, in: Meister, C. and Copan, P. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of religion. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 281295.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. (2024). Divine location and the inheritance of spatial structure, in: Marmodoro, A. and Migliorini, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of omnipresence. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×