Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T12:22:41.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2023

Teresa Baron
Teresa Baron
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Philosopher's Guide to Parenthood
Storks, Surrogates, and Stereotypes
 , pp. 192 - 207
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abegg, E. (1984) ‘The Moral Significance of the Genetic Relation’, The Journal of Bioethics, 5(2), pp. 127–144. doi:10.1007/BF01104002.Google Scholar
van den Akker, O. (2000) ‘The Importance of a Genetic Link in Mothers Commissioning a Surrogate Baby in the UK’, Human Reproduction, 15(8), pp. 1849–1855. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.8.1849.Google Scholar
Amoiridis, C. and Akritidou, A. (2016) Surrogacy Proceedings in Greece after the Implementation of Law 4272/2014. Amoiridis Law Services.Google Scholar
Anderson, E.S. (1990) ‘Is Women’s Labor a Commodity?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(1), pp. 71–92.Google Scholar
Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis, N. (1989) Woman-Nation-State. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-19865-8.Google Scholar
Archard, D. (1990) ‘Child Abuse: Parental Rights and the Interests of the Child’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 7(2), pp. 183–194. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.1990.tb00266.x.Google Scholar
Archard, D. (1995) ‘What’s Blood Got to Do with It? The Significance of Natural Parenthood’, Res Publica, 1(1), pp. 91–106. doi:10.1007/BF01104745.Google Scholar
Archard, D. (2010) ‘The Obligations and Responsibilities of Parenthood’, in Archard, D. and Benatar, D. (eds) Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M.W. (2004) ‘The Failure of Biological Accounts of Parenthood’, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 38(4), pp. 499–510. doi:10.1007/s10790-005-6861-y.Google Scholar
Bahl, A. (1996) ‘Color-Coordinated Families: Race Matching in Adoption in the United States and Britain’, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 28(1), pp. 41–94.Google Scholar
Bancroft, L. (2003) Why Does He Do That?: Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. New York: Berkley Books.Google Scholar
Barnes, L.W. (2014) Conceiving Masculinity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, T. (2019) ‘Nobody Puts Baby in the Container: The Foetal Container Model at Work in Medicine and Commercial Surrogacy’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 36(3), pp. 491–505. doi:10.1111/japp.12336.Google Scholar
Baron, T. (2020a) ‘A Lost Cause? Fundamental Problems for Causal Theories of Parenthood’, Bioethics, 34(7), pp. 664–670. doi:10.1111/bioe.12719.Google Scholar
Baron, T. (2020b) ‘Gestationalism and the Rights of Adolescent Mothers’, Moral Philosophy and Politics, 7(2), pp. 239–254. doi:10.1515/mopp-2019-0045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, K.T. (1984) ‘Re-Thinking Parenthood as an Exclusive Status: The Need for Legal Alternatives When the Premise of the Nuclear Family Has Failed’, Virginia Law Review, 70, pp. 879–963.Google Scholar
Baslington, H. (2002) ‘The Social Organization of Surrogacy: Relinquishing a Baby and the Role of Payment in the Psychological Detachment Process’, Journal of Health Psychology, 7(1), pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
Bayne, T. (2003) ‘Gamete Donation and Parental Responsibility’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(1), pp. 77–87.Google Scholar
Derby, BBC (2005) ‘Sisters Give Birth at 12, 14, 16’, 23 May. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4572219.stm (Accessed: 12 June 2022).Google Scholar
Beck, C.T. (2018) ‘A Secondary Analysis of Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Care Facilities’, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 47(1), pp. 94–104. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beer, J. (2022) This Ukrainian Anti-War Ad Is a Plea to Russian Military Mothers, Fast Company. Available at: www.fastcompany.com/90730211/this-ukrainian-anti-war-ad-is-a-plea-to-russian-military-mothers (Accessed: 29 March 2022).Google Scholar
Beeson, D., Darnovsky, M. and Lippman, A. (2015) ‘What’s in a Name? Variations in Terminology of Third-Party Reproduction’, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 31(6), pp. 805–814. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.004.Google Scholar
Benard, S. and Correll, S.J. (2010) ‘Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty’, Gender & Society, 24(5), pp. 616–646. doi:10.1177/0891243210383142.Google Scholar
Benatar, D. (2012) The Second Sexism: Discrimination against Men and Boys. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Benn, P. and Lupton, M. (2005) ‘Sterilisation of Young, Competent, and Childless Adults’, BMJ, 330(7503), pp. 1323–1325. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7503.1323.Google Scholar
Ben-Naftali, O. and Canor, I. (2008) ‘Evans v. United Kingdom’, The American Journal of International Law, 102(1), pp. 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R. (2014) ‘When Intuition Is Not Enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence Must Work Much Harder to Justify Its Eugenic Vision’, Bioethics, 28(9), pp. 447–455. doi:10.1111/bioe.12044.Google Scholar
Bentley, A. (2006) ‘Booming Baby Food: Infant Food and Feeding in Post-World War II America’, Michigan Historical Review, 32(2), pp. 63–87. doi:10.1353/mhr.2006.0026.Google Scholar
Berend, Z. (2012) ‘The Romance of Surrogacy’, in Sociological Forum, 27(4), pp. 913–936.Google Scholar
Berger, J. (1977) Ways of Seeing. London; New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bigelow, J. and Pargetter, R. (1987) ‘Functions’, Journal of Philosophy, 84(4), pp. 181–196.Google Scholar
Bix, B. (2006) ‘Philosophy, Morality, and Parental Priority’, Family Law Quarterly, 40(1), pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
Björkman, B. and Hansson, S.O. (2006) ‘Bodily Rights and Property Rights’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(4), pp. 209–214.Google Scholar
Blustein, J. (1982) Parents and Children: The Ethics of the Family. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blustein, J. (1997) ‘Procreation and Parental Responsibility’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 28(2), pp. 79–86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1997.tb00377.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boele-Woelki, K., Braat, B. and Sumner, I. (2003) European Family Law in Action: Parental Responsibilities. Intersentia nv.Google Scholar
Bordo, S. (2003) ‘Women, Forced Caesarean Sections and Antenatal Responsibilities’, in Bordo, S. (ed.) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. 10th Anniversary. Berkeley; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, pp. 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, M.T.R. (2018) ‘A Violent Birth: Reframing Coerced Procedures during Childbirth as Obstetric Violence’, Duke Law Journal, 67, pp. 827–862.Google Scholar
Botterell, A. (2016) ‘Why Gametes Are Not Like Enriched Uranium’, Bioethics, 30(9), pp. 741–750. doi:10.1111/bioe.12283.Google Scholar
Brake, E. (2005) ‘Fatherhood and Child Support: Do Men Have a Right to Choose?’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22(1), pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
Brake, E. (2010) ‘Willing Parents: A Voluntarist Account of Parental Role Obligations’, in Archard, D. and Benatar, D. (eds) Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–177.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. (2016) ‘Sperm, Clinics, and Parenthood’, Bioethics, 30(8), pp. 618–627. doi:10.1111/bioe.12270.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. (2017) ‘The Transfer and Delegation of Responsibilities for Genetic Offspring in Gamete Provision’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(5), pp. 665–678. doi:10.1111/japp.12251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandth, B. and Kvande, E. (2018) ‘Masculinity and Fathering Alone during Parental Leave’, Men and Masculinities, 21(1), pp. 72–90. doi:10.1177/1097184X16652659.Google Scholar
Brennan, S. and Noggle, R. (1997) ‘The Moral Status of Children: Children’s Rights, Parents’ Rights, and Family Justice’, Social Theory and Practice, 23(1), pp. 1–26. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract19972311.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H. and Swift, A. (2006) ‘Parents’ Rights and the Value of the Family’, Ethics, 117(1), pp. 80–108. doi:10.1086/508034.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H. and Swift, A. (2014) Family Values: The Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brione, R. (2015) ‘To What Extent Does or Should a Woman’s Autonomy Overrule the Interests of Her Baby? A Study of Autonomy-Related Issues in the Context of Caesarean Section’, The New Bioethics, 21(1), pp. 71–86. doi:10.1179/2050287715Z.00000000058.Google Scholar
Brugger, K. (2012) ‘International Law in the Gestational Surrogacy Debate’, Fordham International Law Journal, 35(3), pp. 665–697.Google Scholar
Bryant, M. ‘Couple Sues Clinic over IVF Mix-Up after Giving Birth to Twins Unrelated to Them’. The Guardian, 9 July 2019, sec. IVF. www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/09/couple-sues-fertility-clinic-ivf-mix-up.Google Scholar
Burtt, S. (2003) ‘The Proper Scope of Parental Authority: Why We Don’t Owe Children an “Open Future”’, Nomos, 44, pp. 243–270.Google Scholar
Cahill, H. (1999) ‘An Orwellian Scenario: Court Ordered Caesarean Section and Women’s Autonomy’, Nursing Ethics, 6(6), pp. 494–505.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. (2012) The Roots of Bioethics: Health, Progress, Technology, Death. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199931378.001.0001.Google Scholar
Cannold, L. (2006) ‘Women, Ectogenesis and Ethical Theory’, in Gelfand, S. and Shook, J.R. (eds) Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction. Editions Rodopi, pp. 47–58. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1995.tb00119.x (Accessed: 25 February 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, N. (2017) The Sale of Children and Illegal Adoption. Netherlands: Terre des Hommes, p. 82.Google Scholar
Carmeli, Y.S. and Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. (1994) ‘The Predicament of Masculinity: Towards Understanding the Male’s Experience of Infertility Treatments’, Sex Roles, 30(9–10), pp. 663–677. doi:10.1007/BF01544669.Google Scholar
Carter‐Walshaw, S. (2018) ‘In Vitro Gametogenesis: The End of Egg Donation?’, Bioethics [Preprint]. doi:10.1111/bioe.12499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G. and Palacios-Gonz, ález, C. (2018) ‘Lesbian Motherhood and Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: Reproductive Freedom and Genetic Kinship’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(12), pp. 835–842. doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104450.Google Scholar
Celdrán, M. et al. (2018) ‘Grandparent Visitation Rights in Spain: Which Psychosocial Arguments Are Taken into Account to Grant or Deny Visits?’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(1), pp. 59–71. doi:10.1080/13218719.2017.1347934.Google Scholar
Chan, S. and Quigley, M. (2007) ‘Frozen Embryos, Genetic Information and Reproductive Rights’, Bioethics, 21(8), pp. 439–448. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.x.Google Scholar
Chmielowski, B.J. (1745) Nowe Ateny [New Athens]. Lviv: Drukarnia Pawła Józefa Golczewskiego.Google Scholar
Cibils, L. (2017) ‘The Discourse of Parental Involvement and the Ideologies of Motherhood’, Counterpoints, 439, pp. 53–78.Google Scholar
Clayton, M. (2015) ‘How Much Do We Owe to Children?*’, in Hannan, S., Brennan, S., and Vernon, R. (eds) Permissible Progeny?: The Morality of Procreation and Parenting. Oxford University Press, pp. 246–264. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199378111.003.0012.Google Scholar
Cohen, A.J. (2017) ‘The Harm Principle and Parental Licensing’, Social Theory and Practice, 43(4), pp. 825–849. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201711124.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. et al. (2016) ‘Sperm Donor Anonymity and Compensation: An Experiment with American Sperm Donors’, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(3), pp. 468–488. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsw052.Google Scholar
Cohen, I.G. (2008) ‘The Right Not to Be a Genetic Parent?’, Southern California Law Review, 81, pp. 1115–1196.Google Scholar
Cohen, I.G. (2017) ‘Artificial Wombs and Abortion Rights’, Hastings Center Report, 47(4), p. Inside back cover. doi:10.1002/hast.730.Google Scholar
Coleman, S. (2004) The Ethics of Artificial Uteruses: Implications for Reproduction and Abortion. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Collett, J.L., Vercel, K. and Boykin, O. (2015) ‘Using Identity Processes to Understand Persistent Inequality in Parenting’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(4), pp. 345–364. doi:10.1177/0190272515607493.Google Scholar
Coltrane, S. (2004) ‘Elite Careers and Family Commitment: It’s (Still) about Gender’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596(1), pp. 214–220. doi:10.1177/0002716204268776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, R.W. (2005) Masculinities. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Costello, R.G. (2001) ‘Fetal Endangerment: A Challenge for Criminal Law’, Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 4(1), p. 2.Google Scholar
Cox, S.J.M. (2020) ‘Grandparent and Third-Party Visitation Rights: A 50 State Survey’, Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 40(2), pp. 76–98.Google Scholar
Craig, L. (2006) ‘Does Father Care Mean Fathers Share?: A Comparison of How Mothers and Fathers in Intact Families Spend Time with Children’, Gender & Society, 20(2), pp. 259–281. doi:10.1177/0891243205285212.Google Scholar
Daar, J. et al. (2016) ‘Human Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer and Reproductive Cloning: an Ethics Committee Opinion’, Fertility and Sterility, 105(4), pp. e1–e4. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, M. (2007) ‘Number of Sperm Donors Rises Despite Removal of Anonymity in UK’, BMJ : British Medical Journal, 334(7601), p. 971. doi:10.1136/bmj.39206.514132.DB.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1984) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Edited by Warnock, M.. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Deshpande, N.A. and Oxford, C.M. (2012) ‘Management of Pregnant Patients Who Refuse Medically Indicated Cesarean Delivery’, Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5(3–4), pp. 144–150.Google Scholar
Dickenson, D. (2017) Property in the Body: Feminist Perspectives. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Bioethics and Law). doi:10.1017/9781316675984.Google Scholar
DiQuinzio, P. (1999) The Impossibility of Motherhood: Feminism, Individualism, and the Problem of Mothering. New York; London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, A. (2014) ‘“I’ve Learnt What a Dad Should Do”: The Interaction of Masculine and Fathering Identities among Men Who Attended a “Dads Only” Parenting Programme’, Sociology, 48(4), pp. 812–828. doi:10.1177/0038038513511872.Google Scholar
Dorow, S.K. (2006) Transnational Adoption: A Cultural Economy of Race, Gender, and Kinship. New York; London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, N. (2018) ‘The Highest Pleasure of Which Woman’s Nature Is Capable: Breastfeeding and the Emergence of the Sentimental Mother’, in Maternal Bodies. University of North Carolina Press (Redefining Motherhood in Early America), pp. 86–114. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/10.5149/9781469637211_doyle.7 (Accessed: 24 March 2021).Google Scholar
Draper, H. (1996) ‘Women, Forced Caesarean Sections and Antenatal Responsibilities’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 22(6), pp. 327–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draper, H. (2007) ‘Paternity Fraud and Compensation for Misattributed Paternity’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(8), pp. 475–480. doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013268.Google Scholar
Ekman, K.E. (2013) Being and Being Bought: Prostitution, Surrogacy and the Split Self. Cheltenham: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar
Ellingsæter, A.L. (2010) ‘Feminist Policies and Feminist Conflicts: Daddy’s Care or Mother’s Milk?’, in Scott, J.L., Crompton, R., and Lyonette, C. (eds) Gender Inequalities in the 21st Century: New Barriers and Continuing Constraints. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 257–274.Google Scholar
Elster, N.R. (2005) ‘Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Contracts, Consents, and Controversies’, American Journal of Family Law, 18(4), pp. 193–199.Google Scholar
Epstein, R.A. (1995) ‘Surrogacy: The Case for Full Contractual Enforcement’, Virginia Law Review, 81(8), p. 2305. doi:10.2307/1073580.Google Scholar
Ertman, M.M. (2003) ‘What’s Wrong with a Parenthood Market? A New and Improved Theory of Commodification’, North Carolina Law Review, 82, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Ettinger, D.J. (2012) ‘Genes, Gestation, and Social Norms’, Law and Philosophy, 31(3), pp. 243–268.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (1992) ‘Multiple Biological Mothers: The Case for Gestation’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 23(1), pp. 98–104. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1992.tb00488.x.Google Scholar
Femenía, N.A. and Gil, C.A. (1987) ‘Argentina’s Mothers of Plaza de Mayo: The Mourning Process from Junta to Democracy’, Feminist Studies, 13(1), pp. 9–18. doi:10.2307/3177832.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, S. (1980) ‘Rights of Children, Rights of Parents, and the Moral Basis of the Family’, Ethics, 91(1), pp. 6–19.Google Scholar
Ferracioli, L. (2018) ‘Procreative-Parenting, Love’s Reasons and the Demands of Morality’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 68(270), pp. 77–97. doi:10.1093/pq/pqx022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetters, A. (2018) ‘The Overlooked Emotional Side of Sperm Donations’, The Atlantic, 9 July. Available at: www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/564587/ (Accessed: 24 July 2018).Google Scholar
Field, M.A. (1990) ‘The Case against Enforcement of Surrogacy Contracts’, Politics and the Life Sciences, 8(2), pp. 199–204.Google Scholar
Finn, S. (2018) ‘Pregnancy: A Case of Applied Metaphysics’, in The 4th Biennial Dorothy Edgington Lectures and Workshop, Birkbeck College, University of London.Google Scholar
Flanigan, J. (2016) ‘Obstetric Autonomy and Informed Consent’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(1), pp. 225–244. doi:10.1007/s10677-015-9610-8.Google Scholar
Fleischer, E. (1990) ‘Ready for Any Sacrifice? Women in IVF Programmes’, Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering, 3(1), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Flood, M. (2003) ‘Lust, Trust and Latex: Why Young Heterosexual Men Do Not Use Condoms’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5(4), pp. 353–369. doi:10.1080/1369105011000028273.Google Scholar
Flowers, V. et al. (2018) Surrogacy: Law, Practice and Policy in England and Wales. London: Family Law.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. and Ragoné, H. (1998) Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, L.P. and Kruk, M.E. (2014) ‘Disrespect and Abuse of Women in Childbirth: Challenging the Global Quality and Accountability Agendas’, The Lancet, 384(9948), pp. e42–e44. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60859-X.Google Scholar
Fuscaldo, G. (2006) ‘Genetic Ties: Are They Morally Binding?’, Bioethics, 20(2), pp. 64–76.Google Scholar
Gardiner, B. (2015) ‘The Kindness of Strangers: Should Surrogates Get Paid?’, The Guardian, 21 November. Available at: www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/nov/21/surrogacy-in-the-uk (Accessed: 11 May 2022).Google Scholar
Gewirtz, P. (1996) ‘On “I Know It When I See It”’, The Yale Law Journal, 105(4), pp. 1023–1047. doi:10.2307/797245.Google Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2012) ‘The Right to Parent One’s Biological Baby’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(4), pp. 432–455. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2011.00402.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2015) ‘Is There a Right to Parent?’, Law, Ethics and Philosophy, 3, pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2016) ‘The Normative Importance of Pregnancy Challenges Surrogacy Contracts’, Analize: Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies, 6(20), pp. 20–31.Google Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2018a) ‘Biological Parenthood: Gestational, Not Genetic’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(2), pp. 225–240. doi:10.1080/00048402.2017.1354389.Google Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2018b) ‘Children’s Vulnerability and Legitimate Authority over Children’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 35, pp. 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12262.Google Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2021) ‘The Best Available Parent’, Ethics, 131(3), pp. 431–459. doi:10.1086/712572.Google Scholar
Gheaus, A. and Straehle, C. (forthcoming) Debating Surrogacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. (2014) ‘Fetal Protection Laws: Moral Panic and the New Constitutional Battlefront’, California Law Review, 102(4), pp. 781–876.Google Scholar
Greil, A.L. (2002) ‘Infertile Bodies: Medicalization, Metaphor, and Agency’, in Inhorn, M.C. and van Balen, F. (eds) Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. University of California Press, pp. 101–118. Available at: https://epdf.pub/infertility-around-the-globe-new-thinking-on-childlessness-gender-and-reproducti.html (Accessed: 30 March 2021).Google Scholar
Groenhout, R.E. (2019) Care Ethics and Social Structures in Medicine. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grossman, J.L. and Friedman, L.M. (2011) ‘Whom Do We Belong To?’, in Grossman, J.L. and Friedman, L.M. (eds.) Inside the Castle: Law and the Family in 20th Century America. Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 286–304.Google Scholar
Guindi, F.E. (2018) ‘Properties of Kinship Structure: Transformational Dynamics of Suckling, Adoption and Incest’, in Shapiro, W. (ed.) Focality and Extension in Kinship: Essays in Memory of Harold W. Scheffler. 1st edn. ANU Press, pp. 177–201. doi:10.22459/FEK.04.2018.05.Google Scholar
Hall, B. (1999) ‘The Origin of Parental Rights’, Public Affairs Quarterly, 13(1), pp. 73–82.Google Scholar
Hall, C.E. (2011) ‘Where Are My Children ... and My Rights? Parental Rights Termination as a Consequence of Deportation’, Duke Law Journal, 60(6), pp. 1459–1503.Google Scholar
Hall, J.C. and Jolowicz, J.A. (1992) ‘Surrogacy and Adoption in Two Jurisdictions’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 51(1), pp. 37–39.Google Scholar
Hall, M. (1985) ‘Rights and the Problem of Surrogate Parenting’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 35(141), pp. 414–424. doi:10.2307/2219475.Google Scholar
Hallich, O. (2019) ‘Embryo Donation or Embryo Adoption? Conceptual and Normative Issues’, Bioethics, 33(6), pp. 653–660. doi:10.1111/bioe.12515.Google Scholar
Hammond, K. (2018) ‘The Role of Normative Ideologies of Motherhood in Intended Mothers’ Experiences of Egg Donation in Canada’, Anthropology & Medicine, 25(3), pp. 265–279. doi:10.1080/13648470.2018.1507483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, E. and Gough, B. (2016) ‘Emoting Infertility Online: A Qualitative Analysis of Men’s Forum Posts’, Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 20(4), pp. 363–382. doi:10.1177/1363459316649765.Google Scholar
Harris, G.W. (1992) ‘Surrogacy, Patriarchy, and Contracts’, Public Affairs Quarterly, 6(3), pp. 255–269.Google Scholar
Harris, J.W. (1996) ‘Who Owns My Body?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 16(1), pp. 55–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, P. (1995) ‘The Ideological Attack on Transracial Adoption in the USA and Britain’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 9(1), pp. 1–22. doi:10.1093/lawfam/9.1.1.Google Scholar
Held, V. (1993) Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hibino, Y. (2020) ‘Non-commercial Surrogacy in Thailand: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications in Local and Global Contexts’, Asian Bioethics Review, 12(2), pp. 135–147. doi:10.1007/s41649-020-00126-2.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (1991) ‘“What Does It Mean to Be a Parent?” The Claims of Biology as the Basis for Parental Rights’, New York University Law Review, 66, pp. 353–420.Google ScholarPubMed
Hochschild, A. and Machung, A. (2012) The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. Penguin.Google Scholar
Horsey, K. (2016) ‘Fraying at the Edges: UK Surrogacy Law in 2015’, Medical Law Review, 24(4), pp. 608–621. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fww013.Google Scholar
Hotke, A. (2014) ‘The Principle of Procreative Beneficence: Old Arguments and a New Challenge’, Bioethics, 28(5), pp. 255–262. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01999.x.Google Scholar
Humberd, B., Ladge, J.J. and Harrington, B. (2015) ‘The “New” Dad: Navigating Fathering Identity within Organizational Contexts’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), pp. 249–266. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9361-x.Google Scholar
Hurst, D. (2018) ‘Japanese Man Wins Sole Custody of 13 Surrogacy Children’, The Guardian, 20 February. Available at: www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/20/japanese-man-custody-13-surrogate-children-thai-court (Accessed: 22 December 2020).Google Scholar
Huston, G.W. (1996) ‘Born to Lose: The Illinois Baby Richard Case – How Examining His Father’s Pre-Birth Conduct Might Have Led to a Different Ending for Richard’, Northern Illinois University Law Review, 16, pp. 543–579.Google Scholar
Jansen, R.P.S. (1985) ‘Sperm and Ova as Property’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 11(3), pp. 123–126.Google Scholar
Johansson, M., Hellström, A.-L. and Berg, M. (2011) ‘Severe Male Infertility after Failed ICSI Treatment-a Phenomenological Study of Men’s Experiences’, Reproductive Health, 8(4), pp. 1–7. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-8-4.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (2005) ‘Looking Like a Family: Negotiating Bio-Genetic Continuity in British Lesbian Families1 Using Licensed Donor Insemination’, Sexualities, 8(2), pp. 221–237. doi:10.1177/1363460705050856.Google Scholar
Joyce, K. (2013) The Child Catchers: Rescue, Trafficking, and the New Gospel of Adoption. Hachette UK.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. (2020) Fixing Parental Leave, Fixing Parental Leave. New York: New York University Press. Available at: www-degruyter-com.ezp.lib.cam.ac.uk/document/doi/10.18574/9781479820146/html (Accessed: 29 March 2021).Google Scholar
Kittay, E.F. (1999) Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kolers, A. and Bayne, T. (2003) ‘Toward a Pluralist Account of Parenthood’, Bioethics, 17(3), pp. 221–242.Google Scholar
Konrad, M. (2005) Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and reproductive gift exchange between British ova donors and recipients. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Krimmel, H.T. (1983) ‘The Case against Surrogate Parenting’, Hastings Center Report, 13(5), pp. 35–39. doi:10.2307/3560577.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1977) ‘Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, pp. 255–276. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1977.tb00045.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, R. (2005) Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture, and Mothers’ Bodies. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Kukla, R. (2006) ‘Ethics and Ideology in Breastfeeding Advocacy Campaigns’, Hypatia, 21(1), pp. 157–180.Google Scholar
Kukla, R. (2008) ‘Measuring Mothering’, IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1(1), pp. 67–90. doi:10.3138/ijfab.1.1.67.Google Scholar
LaChance Adams, S. (2014) Mad Mothers, Bad Mothers, and What a ‘Good’ Mother Would Do: The Ethics of Ambivalence. Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/lach16674.Google Scholar
LaFollette, H. (2017) ‘Licensing Parents Revisited’, in Gilmore, S. (ed.) Parental Rights and Responsibilities. 1st edn. Routledge, pp. 505–521. doi:10.4324/9781315090085-24.Google Scholar
LaRossa, R. et al. (2000) ‘The Changing Culture of Fatherhood in Comic-Strip Families: A Six-Decade Analysis’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), pp. 375–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00375.x.Google Scholar
LaRossa, R. (2005) ‘“Until the Ball Glows in the Twilight”: Fatherhood, Baseball, and the Game of Playing Catch’, in Marsiglio, W., Roy, K., and Fox, G.L. (eds) Situated Fathering: A Focus on Physical and Social Spaces. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., pp. 141–161. doi:10.4324/9780203890707-11.Google Scholar
Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission (2019) Building Families through Surrogacy: A Joint Consultation Paper. Consultation paper 244, p. 475. Available at: https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2019/06/Surrogacy-consultation-paper.pdf.Google Scholar
Lewens, T. (2015) The Biological Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C.S. (1955) The Abolition of Man. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Little, M.O. (1999) ‘Abortion, Intimacy, and the Duty to Gestate’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2(3), pp. 295–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, M. (2000) ‘Adoption: Distinguishing between Gray Market and Black Market Activities’, Family Law Quarterly, 34(3), pp. 553–564.Google Scholar
Lynch, K.D. (2005) ‘Advertising Motherhood: Image, Ideology, and Consumption’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 49, pp. 32–57.Google Scholar
Lyonette, C. and Crompton, R. (2015) ‘Sharing the Load? Partners’ Relative Earnings and the Division of Domestic Labour’, Work, Employment and Society, 29(1), pp. 23–40. doi:10.1177/0950017014523661.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E.E. and Mnookin, R.H. (1992) Dividing the Child: Social and Legal Dilemmas of Custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. (1992) ‘Abortion and Embodiment’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70(2), pp. 136–155. doi:10.1080/00048409212345041.Google Scholar
Macklin, R. (1991) ‘Artificial Means of Reproduction and Our Understanding of the Family’, The Hastings Center Report, 21(1), p. 5. doi:10.2307/3563339.Google Scholar
Malm, H. (2009) ‘Genetic Privacy: Might There Be a Moral Duty to Share One’s Genetic Information?’, The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6–7), pp. 52–54. doi:10.1080/15265160902923440.Google Scholar
Marina, S. et al. (2010) ‘Sharing Motherhood: Biological Lesbian Co-mothers, a New IVF Indication’, Human Reproduction, 25(4), pp. 938–941. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathison, E. and Davis, J. (2017) ‘Is There a Right to the Death of the Foetus?’, Bioethics, 31(4), pp. 313–320. doi:10.1111/bioe.12331.Google Scholar
McDonald, E.E. (2009) ‘Sperm Donor or Thwarted Father? How Written Agreement Statutes Are Changing the Way Courts Resolve Legal Parentage Issues in Assisted Reproduction Cases’, Family Court Review, 47(2), pp. 340–355. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01258.x.Google Scholar
Mclean, S.A.M. and Mason, J.K. (2003) ‘Assisted Reproduction’, in McLean, S. and Mason, J.K. (eds.) Legal and Ethical Aspects of Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
McQueen, P. (2017) ‘Autonomy, Age and Sterilisation Requests’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(5), pp. 310–313. doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103664.Google Scholar
Merla, L. (2008) ‘Determinants, Costs, and Meanings of Belgian Stay-at-Home Fathers: An International Comparison’, Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 6(2), pp. 113–132. doi:10.3149/fth.0602.113.Google Scholar
Mertes, H. (2014) ‘Gamete Derivation from Stem Cells: Revisiting the Concept of Genetic Parenthood’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(11), pp. 744–747.Google Scholar
Meyer, D.R. and Garasky, S. (1993) ‘Custodial Fathers: Myths, Realities, and Child Support Policy’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(1), p. 73. doi:10.2307/352960.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (2008) ‘Blogging Infertility’, The New Atlantis, 19, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
Mills, E. and McConvill, J. (2004) ‘Family Law in Australia: Re Patrick and the Matter of Child A’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 8(1), pp. 17–44. doi:10.1080/1364298042000212529.Google Scholar
Millum, J. (2008) ‘How Do We Acquire Parental Responsibilities?’, Social Theory and Practice, 34(1), pp. 71–93.Google Scholar
Millum, J. (2010) ‘How Do We Acquire Parental Rights?’, Social Theory and Practice, 36(1), p. 112.Google Scholar
Mincy, R.B. and Sorensen, E.J. (1998) ‘Deadbeats and Turnips in Child Support Reform’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(1), pp. 44–51.Google Scholar
Mold, J.E. et al. (2008) ‘Maternal Alloantigens Promote the Development of Tolerogenic Fetal Regulatory T Cells in Utero’, Science, 322(5907), pp. 1562–5.Google Scholar
Montague, P. (2000) ‘The Myth of Parental Rights’, Social Theory and Practice, 26(1), pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
Mosikatsana, T.L. (2003) ‘www.buyababy.com: Inter-Country Adoption’, The South African Law Journal, 120, pp. 103–136.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, M. (2020) ‘The Management of Unequal Patient Status in Fertility Medicine: Donors’ and Intended Parents’ Experiences of Participatory and Imposed Enrollment’, Social Science & Medicine, 247, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
Mulligan, A. (2020) ‘Protecting Identity in Collaborative Assisted Reproduction: The Right to Know One’s Gestational Surrogate’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 34(1), pp. 20–42Google Scholar
Mullin, A. (2005) Reconceiving Pregnancy and Childcare: Ethics, Experience, and Reproductive Labor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511814280.Google Scholar
Murphy, T.F. (2014) ‘The Meaning of Synthetic Gametes for Gay and Lesbian People and Bioethics Too’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(11), pp. 762–765. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101699.Google Scholar
Murphy, T.F. (2018) ‘Pathways to Genetic Parenthood for Same-Sex Couples’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(12), pp. 823–824. doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104291.Google Scholar
N. O. (2013) ‘Baby on Sale: Illegal adoptions in Poland’, The Economist, 26 July. Available at: www.economist.com/eastern-approaches/2013/07/26/baby-on-sale (Accessed: 30 July 2018).Google Scholar
Nelson, J.L. (1991) ‘Parental Obligations and the Ethics of Surrogacy: A Causal Perspective’, Public Affairs Quarterly, 5(1), pp. 49–61.Google Scholar
Newman, A.M. (2019) ‘Mixing and Matching: Sperm Donor Selection for Interracial Lesbian Couples’, Medical Anthropology, 38(8), pp. 710–724. doi:10.1080/01459740.2019.1655737.Google Scholar
Nichols, G., and Pulliam, (2015) ‘“You Have to Put Your Children’s Needs First or You’re Really not a Good Mother”: Black Motherhood and Self-Care Practices’, Women, Gender, and Families of Color, 3(2), p. 165. doi:10.5406/womgenfamcol.3.2.0165.Google Scholar
van Nijnatten, C. and de Graaf, W. (2002) ‘The Legal Management of (Social) Parenthood: Adoption and Dutch Family Policy’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 24(3), pp. 263–277. doi:10.1080/09649060210161276.Google Scholar
Noddings, N. (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Notini, L., Gyngell, C. and Savulescu, J. (2019) ‘Drawing the Line on In Vitro Gametogenesis’, Bioethics, pp. 1–12. doi:10.1111/bioe.12679.Google Scholar
Oren, L. (2006) ‘Thwarted Fathers or Pop-Up Pops?: How to Determine When Putative Fathers Can Block the Adoption of Their Newborn Children’, Family Law Quarterly, 40(2), pp. 153–190.Google Scholar
Overall, C. (2015) ‘Rethinking Abortion, Ectogenesis, and Fetal Death’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 46(1), pp. 126–140. doi:10.1111/josp.12090.Google Scholar
Page, E. (1984) ‘Parental Rights’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 1(2), pp. 187–203.Google Scholar
Page, E. (1985) ‘Donation, Surrogacy and Adoption’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2(2), pp. 161–172.Google Scholar
Pande, A. (2010) ‘Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(4), pp. 969–992. doi:10.1086/651043.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1987) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parkes, P. (2001) ‘Alternative Social Structures and Foster Relations in the Hindu Kush: Milk Kinship Allegiance in Former Mountain Kingdoms of Northern Pakistan’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 43(1), pp. 4–36. doi:10.1017/S0010417501003565.Google Scholar
Pettersen, T. (2012) ‘Conceptions of Care: Altruism, Feminism, and Mature Care’, Hypatia, 27(2), pp. 366–389. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01197.x.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2015) Parenting in America: Outlook, Worries, Aspirations Are Strongly Linked to Financial Situation.Google Scholar
van der Pijl, M.S.G. et al. (2020) ‘Left Powerless: A Qualitative Social Media Content Analysis of the Dutch #breakthesilence Campaign on Negative and Traumatic Experiences of Labour and Birth’, PLOS ONE. Edited by F. Fischer, 15(5), p. e0233114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233114.Google Scholar
Porter, L. (2014) ‘Why and How to Prefer a Causal Account of Parenthood’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 45(2), pp. 182–202.Google Scholar
Porter, L. (2015) ‘Gestation and Parental Rights: Why Is Good Enough Good Enough?’, Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 1(1). doi:10.5206/fpq/2015.1.5.Google Scholar
Pritchard, C. (2014) ‘The Girl with Three Biological Parents’, BBC News, 1 September. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28986843 (Accessed: 16 April 2019).Google Scholar
Prusak, B.G. (2011) ‘The Costs of Procreation’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 42(1), pp. 61–75. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2010.01519.x.Google Scholar
Purvis, D.E. (2012) ‘The Origin of Parental Rights: Labor, Intent, and Fathers’, Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 13-21, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2115696 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2115696Google Scholar
Pustilnik, A.C. (2002) ‘Private Ordering, Legal Ordering, and the Getting of Children: A Counterhistory of Adoption Law’, Yale Law & Policy Review, 20(1), pp. 263–296.Google Scholar
Quiroga, S.S. (2007) ‘Blood Is Thicker than Water: Policing Donor Insemination and the Reproduction of Whiteness’, Hypatia, 22(2), pp. 143–161. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb00986.x.Google Scholar
Ramazanoglu, C. (1989) Feminism and the Contradictions of Oppression. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ransaw, (2014) ‘The Good Father: African American Fathers Who Positively Influence the Educational Outcomes of Their Children’, Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men, 2(2), pp. 1–25. doi:10.2979/spectrum.2.2.1.Google Scholar
Räsänen, J. (2017) ‘Ectogenesis, Abortion and a Right to the Death of the Fetus’, Bioethics, 31(9), pp. 697–702. doi:10.1111/bioe.12404.Google Scholar
Reader, S. (2008) ‘Abortion, Killing, and Maternal Moral Authority’, Hypatia, 23(1), pp. 132–149. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01169.x.Google Scholar
Resnik, D.B. (2009) ‘Direct-to-Consumer Genomics, Social Networking, and Confidentiality’, The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6–7), pp. 45–46. doi:10.1080/15265160902893924.Google Scholar
Rhoden, N.K. (1986) ‘The Judge in the Delivery Room: The Emergence of Court-Ordered Cesareans’, California Law Review, 74(6), pp. 1951–2030.Google Scholar
Richards, N. (2016) ‘How We Acquire Parental Rights’, in Francis, L. (ed.)The Oxford Handbook of Reproductive Ethics. Oxford University Press, pp. 265–284. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981878.013.13.Google Scholar
Risman, B.J. (1986) ‘Can Men “Mother”? Life as a Single Father’, Family Relations, 35(1), pp. 95–102. doi:10.2307/584288.Google Scholar
Risman, B.J. (1987) ‘Intimate Relationships from a Microstructural Perspective: Men Who Mother’, Gender and Society, 1(1), pp. 6–32.Google Scholar
Robertson, J.A. (1983) ‘Surrogate Mothers: Not So Novel after All’, The Hastings Center Report, 13(5), p. 28. doi:10.2307/3560576.Google Scholar
Robertson, J.A. (1989) ‘Resolving Disputes over Frozen Embryos’, The Hastings Center Report, 19(6), p. 7. doi:10.2307/3561979.Google Scholar
Rochlen, A.B. et al. (2008) ‘“I’m Just Providing for My Family”: A Qualitative Study of Stay-at-Home Fathers’, Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9(4), pp. 193–206. doi:10.1037/a0012510.Google Scholar
Rothman, B.K. (1989) Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rothman, B.K. (1991) ‘Reproductive Technologies and Surrogacy: A Feminist Perspective’, Creighton Law Review, 25, p. 1599.Google Scholar
Rothman, B.K. (1996) ‘Daddy Plants a Seed: Personhood under Patriarchy’, Hastings Law Journal, 47, pp. 1241–1248.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1979) Emile; or, On Education. Translated by A. Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ruddick, S. (1980) ‘Maternal Thinking’, Feminist Studies, 6(2), pp. 342–367.Google Scholar
Ruddick, S. (1983) ‘Thinking about Mothering: and Putting Maternal Thinking to Use’, Women’s Studies Quarterly, 11(4), pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
Rushing, C. and Powell, L. (2015) ‘Family Dynamics of the Stay-at-Home Father and Working Mother Relationship’, American Journal of Men’s Health, 9(5), pp. 410–420. doi:10.1177/1557988314549414.Google Scholar
Sandelowski, M. (1991) ‘Compelled to Try: The Never-Enough Quality of Conceptive Technology’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 5(1), pp. 29–47. doi:10.1525/maq.1991.5.1.02a00070.Google Scholar
Savulescu, J. (2001) ‘Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children’, Bioethics, 15(5–6), pp. 413–426. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00251.Google Scholar
Segers, S. et al. (2017) ‘Balancing Ethical Pros and Cons of Stem Cell Derived Gametes’, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 45(7), pp. 1620–1632. doi:10.1007/s10439-017-1793-9.Google Scholar
Shanley, M.L. (1995a) ‘Fathers’ Rights, Mothers’ Wrongs? Reflections on Unwed Fathers’ Rights and Sex Equality’, Hypatia, 10(1), pp. 74–103. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01354.x.Google Scholar
Shanley, M.L. (1995b) ‘Unwed Fathers’ Rights, Adoption, and Sex Equality: Gender-Neutrality and the Perpetuation of Patriarchy’, Columbia Law Review, 95(1), pp. 60–103. doi:10.2307/1123127.Google Scholar
Shanner, L. (1997) ‘Pregnancy Intervention and Models of Maternal-Fetal Relationship: Philosophical Reflections on the Winnipeg CFS Dissent’, Alberta Law Review, 36, p. 751.Google Scholar
Shultz, M.M. (1990) ‘Reproductive Technology and Intent-Based Parenthood: An Opportunity for Gender Neutrality’, Wisconsin Law Review, 297, pp. 297–398.Google Scholar
Silver, L.M. (1998) Remaking Eden: Cloning, Genetic Engineering and the Future of Humankind? London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Silver, L.M. (2001) ‘Confused Meanings of Life, Genes and Parents’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 32(4), pp. 647–661. doi:10.1016/S1369-8486(01)00032-2.Google Scholar
Slote, M. (1998) ‘The Justice of Caring’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 15(1), pp. 171–195. doi:10.1017/S0265052500003113.Google Scholar
Solomon, C.R. (2014) ‘“I Feel Like a Rock Star”: Fatherhood for Stay-at-Home Fathers’, Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 12(1), pp. 52–70. doi:10.3149/fth.1201.52.Google Scholar
Sparrow, R. (2007) ‘Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics’, Genomics, Society and Policy, 3(3), p. 43. doi:10.1186/1746-5354-3-3-43.Google Scholar
Sparrow, R., Mills, C. and Carroll, J. (2021) ‘Gendering the Seed: Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques and the Erasure of the Maternal’, Bioethics, 35(7), pp. 608–614. doi:10.1111/bioe.12868.Google Scholar
Steinbock, B. (1988) ‘Surrogate Motherhood as Prenatal Adoption’, Law, Medicine and Health Care, 16(1–2), pp. 44–50. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.1988.tb01049.x.Google Scholar
Stumpf, A.E. (1986) ‘Redefining Mother: A Legal Matrix for New Reproductive Technologies’, The Yale Law Journal, 96(1), pp. 187–208. doi:10.2307/796440.Google Scholar
Stuvøy, I. (2018) ‘Accounting for the Money-Made Parenthood of Transnational Surrogacy’, Anthropology & Medicine, 25(3), pp. 280–295. doi:10.1080/13648470.2017.1392100.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J. (2006) ‘“Parenting” or “Mothering”? The Case of Modern Childcare Magazines’, Discourse & Society, 17(4), pp. 503–528. doi:10.1177/0957926506063126.Google Scholar
Suwada, K. and Plantin, L. (2014) ‘On Fatherhood, Masculinities, and Family Policies in Poland and Sweden – A Comparative Study’, Polish Sociological Review, 188, pp. 509–524.Google Scholar
Svěrák, J. (1996) Kolja.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. (2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, J.J. (1976) ‘A Defense of Abortion’, in Biomedical Ethics and the Law. Springer, pp. 39–54. Available at: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-2223-8_5 (Accessed: 4 October 2017).Google Scholar
Tober, D. (2019) Romancing the Sperm: Shifting Biopolitics and the Making of Modern Families. Rutgers University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt2204qzs.Google Scholar
Tong, R. (1990) ‘The Overdue Death of a Feminist Chameleon: Taking a Stand on Surrogacy Arrangements’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 21(2–3), pp. 40–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1990.tb00275.x.Google Scholar
Tractenberg, P.L. (2013) Courting Justice: Ten New Jersey Cases That Shook the Nation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Traynor, I. (2000) ‘Russian Mothers Mobilise against Chechnya Campaign’, The Guardian, 3 February. Available at: www.theguardian.com/world/2000/feb/03/chechnya.iantraynor1 (Accessed: 30 March 2022).Google Scholar
Troilo, J. and Coleman, M. (2008) ‘College Student Perceptions of the Content of Father Stereotypes’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(1), pp. 218–227. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00473.x.Google Scholar
Ulrich, M.R. (2012) ‘With Child, without Rights?: Restoring a Pregnant Woman’s Right to Refuse Medical Treatment through the HIV Lens’, Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 24(2), pp. 303–336.Google Scholar
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2009) Child Adoption: Trends and Policies. ST/ESA/SER.A/292. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Usborne, S. (2019) ‘“It Was Seen as Weird”: Why Are So Few Men Taking Shared Parental Leave?’, The Guardian, 5 October. Available at: www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/oct/05/shared-parental-leave-seen-as-weird-paternity-leave-in-decline (Accessed: 29 March 2021).Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. (2003) ‘Rights and Duties of Childrearing’, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 11(3), pp. 991–1010.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. D. (2008) ‘The Gift of Life’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36(3), pp. 245–266.Google Scholar
Waggoner, M.R. (2015) ‘Cultivating the Maternal Future: Public Health and the Prepregnant Self’, Signs, 40(4), pp. 939–962.Google Scholar
Waldman, E. (2002) ‘King Solomon in the Age of Assisted Reproduction’, Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 24(2), pp. 217–228.Google Scholar
Wall, G. and Arnold, S. (2007) ‘How Involved Is Involved Fathering?: An Exploration of the Contemporary Culture of Fatherhood’, Gender & Society, 21(4), pp. 508–527. doi:10.1177/0891243207304973.Google Scholar
Wall, K. (2014) ‘Fathers on Leave Alone: Does It Make a Difference to Their Lives?’, Fathering, 12(2), pp. 196–210.Google Scholar
Watt, H. (2014) ‘Ancestor Embryos: Embryonic Gametes and Genetic Parenthood’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(11), pp. 759–761. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101819.Google Scholar
Wayne, J.H. and Cordeiro, B.L. (2003) ‘Who Is a Good Organizational Citizen? Social Perception of Male and Female Employees Who Use Family Leave’, Sex Roles, 49, pp. 233–246.Google Scholar
Webb, R.E. and Daniluk, J.C. (1999) ‘The End of the Line: Infertile Men’s Experiences of Being Unable to Produce a Child’, Men and Masculinities, 2(1), pp. 6–25. doi:10.1177/1097184X99002001002.Google Scholar
Weinberg, R. (2008) ‘The Moral Complexity of Sperm Donation’, Bioethics, 22(3), pp. 166–178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00624.x.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, R. (1971) ‘Understanding the Abortion Argument’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), pp. 67–95.Google Scholar
Wetterberg, A. (2004) ‘My Body, My Choice ... My Responsibility: The Pregnant Woman as Caretaker of the Fetal Person’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 48, pp. 26–49.Google Scholar
Wheeler, C. (2004) ‘Babies-for-Sale Trade Faces a Global Crackdown’, The Guardian, 21 November. Available at: www.theguardian.com/society/2004/nov/21/adoptionandfostering.adoption (Accessed: 6 August 2018).Google Scholar
Whittaker, A. and Speier, A. (2010) ‘“Cycling Overseas”: Care, Commodification, and Stratification in Cross-Border Reproductive Travel’, Medical Anthropology, 29(4), pp. 363–383. doi:10.1080/01459740.2010.501313.Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2010) ‘Resolving Disputes over Frozen Embryos: A New Proposal’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 27(2), pp. 172–185. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00476.x.Google Scholar
Williams, S. (2008) ‘What Is Fatherhood?: Searching for the Reflexive Father’, Sociology, 42(3), pp. 487–502. doi:10.1177/0038038508088837.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. (2014) The Mamas and Papas: Legal Recognition of Parentage in a Mixed up World. Tanfield Chambers, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Winddance Twine, F. (2012) Outsourcing the Womb. 0 edn. New York; Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203834206.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1958) Philosophical Investigations. 3rd edn. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woollard, F. (2017) ‘I, Me, Mine: Body-Ownership and the Generation Problem’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98, pp. 87–108. doi:10.1111/papq.12156.Google Scholar
Woollard, F. (2018) ‘Should We Talk about the “Benefits” of Breastfeeding? The Significance of the Default in Representations of Infant Feeding’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(11), pp. 756–760. doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-104789.Google Scholar
Young, I.M. (1994) ‘Punishment, Treatment, Empowerment: Three Approaches to Policy for Pregnant Addicts’, Feminist Studies, 20(1), p. 32. doi:10.2307/3178429.Google Scholar
Younger, J.T. (1988) ‘What the Baby M Case Is Really All About’, Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, 6(2), pp. 75–82.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Teresa Baron, University of Nottingham
  • Book: The Philosopher's Guide to Parenthood
  • Online publication: 15 January 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009299206.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Teresa Baron, University of Nottingham
  • Book: The Philosopher's Guide to Parenthood
  • Online publication: 15 January 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009299206.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Teresa Baron, University of Nottingham
  • Book: The Philosopher's Guide to Parenthood
  • Online publication: 15 January 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009299206.008
Available formats
×