Book contents
- Patient Safety and Quality Improvement in Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Patient Safety and Quality Improvement in Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Section 1 Design and Simulation
- Chapter 2 Use of Simulation and Patient Safety
- Chapter 3 Using Human-Centered Design to Create a Safer Anesthesia Workspace
- Section 2 Quality Improvement Tools
- Section 3 Reporting and Databases
- Section 4 Putting Tools into Practice
- Section 5 People, Behavior, and Communication
- Index
- References
Chapter 3 - Using Human-Centered Design to Create a Safer Anesthesia Workspace
from Section 1 - Design and Simulation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2023
Book contents
- Patient Safety and Quality Improvement in Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Patient Safety and Quality Improvement in Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Section 1 Design and Simulation
- Chapter 2 Use of Simulation and Patient Safety
- Chapter 3 Using Human-Centered Design to Create a Safer Anesthesia Workspace
- Section 2 Quality Improvement Tools
- Section 3 Reporting and Databases
- Section 4 Putting Tools into Practice
- Section 5 People, Behavior, and Communication
- Index
- References
Summary
The design of the anesthesia workspace can have an enormous impact on errors, patient safety, and outcomes. Human-centered design (HCD) is a multidisciplinary field focused on how to design spaces and tools to maximize human performance. Bringing the lessons from HCD to the anesthesia workspace can improve patient safety and make clinicians more effective. Two medication safety projects at Seattle Children’s Hospital, new medication trays and a medication template, help to demonstrate how to deploy design principles in the operating room. Future improvements in patient safety in anesthesia will rely upon how providers interact with information systems, clinical tools, and one another, and the quality of these interactions is profoundly influenced by how these systems are designed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Proctor, RW and Van Zandt, T. Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems, 2nd ed., Boca Raton, Taylor & Francis Group, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, E, Jentsch, F, and Maurino, D, eds. Human Factors in Aviation, 2nd ed., Burlington, Academic Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, SM. Aspects of a cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery. Science. 1988;240:1621–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidwell, W, Holden, K, and Butler, J. Universal Principles of Design. Beverly, Rockport, 2010.Google Scholar
Leveson, NG and Turner, CS. An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer. 1993;26:18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, DA. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York, Basic Books, 2013.Google Scholar
Guastello, SJ. Human Factors Engineering and Ergonomics: A Systems approach. 2nd ed., Boca Raton, Taylor & Francis, 2014.Google Scholar
Gibson, JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdalen, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
Gallo, C. The Innovation Secrets of Steve Jobs: Insanely Different Principles for Breakthrough Success. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2011.Google Scholar
Norman, DA. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York, Basic Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Paries, J, Wreathall, J, and Hollnagel, E, eds., Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook. Boca Raton, Taylor & Francis, 2011.Google Scholar
Tsuda, Y. Implications of foolproofing in the manufacturing process. Quality through Engineering Design. Kuo, W., ed., New York, Elsevier, 1993.Google Scholar
Degani, A, Wiener, EL. On the design of flight deck procedures. NASA Ames Research Center. NASA Contractor Report 177642, 1994.Google Scholar
Klein, G, Moon, B, and Hoffman, RF. Making sense of sensemaking I: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2006a;21:70–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, G, Moon, B, and Hoffman, RF. Making sense of sensemaking II: A macrocognitive model. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2006b;21:88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonemetz, J and Ruskin, K, eds. Anesthesia Informatics. London, Springer-Veralong, 2008.Google Scholar
Drui, AB, Behm, RJ, and Martin, WE. Predesign investigation of the anesthesia operational environment. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1973;52:584–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, LD, Grigg, E, and Verma, S, et al. Outcomes of a failure mode and effects analysis for medication errors in pediatric anesthesia. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2017;27:571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review. 1956;63:81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, A. Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1988;40A:201–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigg, E, Martin, L, Ross, F, et al. Assessing the impact of the anesthesia medication template on medication errors during anesthesia: A prospective study. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017;124:1617–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J and Norman, DA. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science. 1994;18:87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar