Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Optical wide area networks
- Overview
- 5 Generalized multiprotocol label switching
- 6 Waveband switching
- 7 Photonic slot routing
- 8 Optical flow switching
- 9 Optical burst switching
- 10 Optical packet switching
- Part III Optical metropolitan area networks
- Part IV Optical access and local area networks
- Part V Testbeds
- Bibliography
- Index
9 - Optical burst switching
from Part II - Optical wide area networks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Optical wide area networks
- Overview
- 5 Generalized multiprotocol label switching
- 6 Waveband switching
- 7 Photonic slot routing
- 8 Optical flow switching
- 9 Optical burst switching
- 10 Optical packet switching
- Part III Optical metropolitan area networks
- Part IV Optical access and local area networks
- Part V Testbeds
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Optical burst switching (OBS) is one of the recently proposed optical switching techniques which probably received the greatest deal of attention (Chen et al., 2004). OBS may be viewed as a switching technique that combines the merits of optical circuit switching (OCS) and optical packet switching (OPS) while avoiding their respective shortcomings. The switching granularity at the burst rather than wavelength level allows for statistical multiplexing in OBS, which is not possible in OCS, while requiring a lower control overhead than OPS. More precisely, in OCS, the entire bandwidth of each lightpath is dedicated to one pair of source and destination nodes and unused bandwidth cannot be reclaimed by other nodes ready to send data. Thus, OCS does not allow for statistical multiplexing. On the other hand, in OCS networks no OEO conversion is needed at intermediate nodes. As a result, OCS networks provide all-optical circuits that are transparent in terms of bit rate, modulation scheme, and protocol. OCS is well suited for large data transmissions whose long connection holding time on the order of a few minutes, hours, days, weeks, or even months justify the involved twoway reservation overhead for setting up or releasing a lightpath, which may take a few hundred milliseconds. Since many applications require only subwavelength bandwidth and/or involve bursts that last only a few seconds or less, the coarse wavelength switching granularity of OCS becomes increasingly inefficient and impractical. Unlike OCS, OPS is able to provide a significant statistical multiplexing gain due to the fact that bandwidth is not dedicated to a single connection but may be shared by multiple data flows.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Optical Switching Networks , pp. 103 - 134Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008