Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T06:14:18.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Future of the Open Source Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2010

Fadi P. Deek
Affiliation:
New Jersey Institute of Technology
James A. M. McHugh
Affiliation:
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

This chapter attempts to present a balanced view of what the future seems likely to hold for the open source movement based on past and present trends and the underlying structural, social, political, scientific, and economic forces at work. We will first sketch what we believe are the likely dominant modes for software development and then we will elaborate on the rationales for our projections.

First of all, we believe the open source paradigm is moving inexorably toward worldwide domination of computer software infrastructure. Its areas of dominance seem likely to include not only the network and its associated utilities, but also operating systems, desktop environments, and the standard office utilities. Significantly, it seems that precisely the most familiar and routine applications will become commoditized and satisfied by open source implementations, facilitating pervasive public recognition of the movement. The software products whose current dominance seems likely to decline because of this transformation include significant components of the Microsoft environment from operating systems to office software.

However, despite a likely widespread increase in the recognition, acceptance, and use of open source, this does not imply that open software will dominate the entire universe of software applications. The magnitude of financial resources available to proprietary developers is enormous and increasing, giving such corporations a huge advantage in product development. One might note, for example, that expenditures on research and development by publicly traded software companies increased tenfold between 1986 and 2000, from 1 to 10% of industrial research expenditures (Evans, 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
Open Source
Technology and Policy
, pp. 325 - 335
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnone, M. (2006). A New Direction for Open Source: Software Vendors Consider Switch to Fee-Based Model. http://www.fcw.com/article95251–07-17–06-Print. Accessed November 30, 2006.Google Scholar
Beesen, J. (2002). What Good Is Free Software? In: Government Policy toward Open Source Software, Hahn, R. W. (editor). Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Capek, C., Frank, S., Gerdt, S., and Shields, D. (2005). A History of IBM's Open-Source Involvement and Strategy. IBM Systems Journal, 44(2), 249–257.Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2002). Politics and Programming: Government Preferences for Promoting Open Source Software. In: Government Policy toward Open Source Software, Hahn, R. W. (editor). Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. (2002). Government Policy toward Open Source Software: An Overview. In: Government Policy toward Open Source Software, Hahn, R. W. (editor). Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hohn, S. and Herr, G. (2004). Open Source: Open for Business. A Report from Computer Science Corporation: Leading Edge Forum, September. http://www.csc.com/features/2004/uploads/LEF_OPENSOURCE.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2006.Google Scholar
Lussier, S. (2004). New Tricks: How Open Source Changed the Way My Team Works. IEEE Software, 21(1), 68–72.Google Scholar
Messerschmitt, D. (2004). Back to the User. IEEE Software, 21(1), 89–91.Google Scholar
Moglen, E. (2003). Freeing the Mind: Free Software and the Death of Proprietary Culture. June 29, 15 pp. http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/publications/maine-speech.html. Accessed December 20, 2006.Google Scholar
Raymond, E. (2004). Up from Alchemy. IEEE Software, 21(1), 88–90.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. (2005). Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Searls, D. (2002). Raising the Red Flag. 2002–01–30. http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5784. Accessed November 30, 2006.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×