Book contents
- The New Modernist Studies
- Twenty-First-Century Critical Revisions
- The New Modernist Studies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- I Histories
- II Horizons
- Chapter 3 Planetarity’s Edges
- Chapter 4 Religion’s Configurations
- Chapter 5 Disability’s Disruptions
- Chapter 6 Affect’s Vocabularies
- Chapter 7 Invisibility’s Arts
- Chapter 8 Black Writing’s Visuals
- Chapter 9 Noir Film’s Soundtracks
- Chapter 10 Language’s Hopes
- Chapter 11 Revolution’s Demands
- Chapter 12 Feminism’s Archives
- Chapter 13 Risk’s Instruments
- Chapter 14 Deep Time’s Hauntings
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 11 - Revolution’s Demands
Modernism, Socialist Realism, and the Manifesto
from II - Horizons
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2021
- The New Modernist Studies
- Twenty-First-Century Critical Revisions
- The New Modernist Studies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- I Histories
- II Horizons
- Chapter 3 Planetarity’s Edges
- Chapter 4 Religion’s Configurations
- Chapter 5 Disability’s Disruptions
- Chapter 6 Affect’s Vocabularies
- Chapter 7 Invisibility’s Arts
- Chapter 8 Black Writing’s Visuals
- Chapter 9 Noir Film’s Soundtracks
- Chapter 10 Language’s Hopes
- Chapter 11 Revolution’s Demands
- Chapter 12 Feminism’s Archives
- Chapter 13 Risk’s Instruments
- Chapter 14 Deep Time’s Hauntings
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Revolution has long been regarded as generative for modernism, with several scholars noting the frequent, often troubled alignment of artistic and political vanguards. A key case in point from the new modernist studies is Martin Puchner’s Poetry of the Revolution (2006), which presents the Communist Manifesto as a model for world literature – in particular, for avant-garde manifestos throughout the twentieth century. This article expands Puchner’s framework by applying it to the 1934 Soviet Writers Congress and Mao Zedong’s 1942 Yan’an Forum on Literature and Art, events which marked the subordination of artists and writers to the political vanguard. However, reading the documents from these events as manifestos makes it possible to blur the boundary between modernism and (socialist) realism and, in the process, to expand the reach of global modernism to realms typically closed off from it – Stalin’s Soviet Union and Mao’s China.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Modernist Studies , pp. 225 - 245Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021