Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:31:46.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Sharing the pieces of jurisdictional authority: mapping the possibilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Ayelet Shachar
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Our legal institutions must recognize the situational uniqueness of our contemporary political-legal reality. This requires a paradigm shift in our thinking: a shift that both encompasses and enables a deeper and wider understanding of situational complexity, as experienced by individuals culturally and jurisdictionally tied to multiple communities. Since none of the presently available normative or legal models provides an adequate balance between respecting cultural difference and protecting individual rights, we must begin imagining possibilities for institutions through a new approach – joint governance.

The joint governance approach

Joint governance considers the challenges of multiculturalism by recognizing that some persons will belong to more than one political community, and will bear rights and obligations that derive from more than one source of legal authority. More specifically, joint governance promises to foster ongoing interaction between different sources of authority, as a means of improving the situation of traditionally vulnerable insiders without forcing them to adhere to an either/or choice between their culture and their rights.

This can be done by envisioning a radically new architecture for dividing and sharing authority in the multicultural state, one which encourages a mode of governance composed of dialogue between different non-monopolist power centers, rather than an imposition by “all-knowing” state or group officials. Joint governance thus offers an innovative new approach to the paradox of multicultural vulnerability by seeking to translate into concrete policy measures a key normative commitment: enhancing justice between groups and reducing injustice within them.

Type
Chapter
Information
Multicultural Jurisdictions
Cultural Differences and Women's Rights
, pp. 88 - 116
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×