Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:03:24.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Analyzing the reading abilities of four boys: educational implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Susan Brady
Edited by
Kurt W. Fischer ,
Jane Holmes Bernstein  and
Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
Susan Brady
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychology University of Rhode Island; Senior Scientist Haskins Laboratories
Kurt W. Fischer
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Jane Holmes Bernstein
Affiliation:
The Children's Hospital, Boston
Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

Overview: In order for neuropsychological research on dyslexia to be useful to educators and learning-disabled children, its educational implications must be laid out explicitly, and the working definitions and categories framing the neuropsychological research must be tested against the demonstrated needs of dyslexic children. The goal is to assure a good fit between the questions guiding the neuropsychological research and the questions asked by educators about their students. Brady translates the neuropsychological work, such as research on rapid serial naming, into recommendations for educational practice and indicates where neuropsychological research categories seem incongruent with the educational evidence. For example, research indicating that dyslexic children have phonological processing problems often has unclear implications, because several relevant skills, such as phonemic awareness and grapheme decoding, are unjustifiably lumped together. Progress on understanding dyslexia requires better analysis of the relations between written and oral language processing, including component reading skills.

The Editors

As Jane Holmes Bernstein describes in Chapter 14 (this volume), four boys varying in reading ability were filmed and given a battery of tests to provide a framework for discussion about current views on reading acquisition and reading difficulties. The boys are presented in three contexts. First, each is introduced and portions of his individual conversations with the tester are included, providing a brief window on each boy's language skills and personality. Next, samples of each child's performance on three of the rapid naming tasks are shown: color naming, letter naming, and object naming.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mind, Brain, and Education in Reading Disorders , pp. 196 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. J., Foorman, B. R., Lundberg, I. & Beeler, T. (1998). Phoneme awareness in young children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Badian, N. (1993). Phonemic awareness, naming, visual symbol processing, and reading. Reading and Writing: An Inter-disciplinary Journal, 5, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S. & Johnston, F. (2004). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary and spelling instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Blachman, B. A. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skills to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 610–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blachman, B. A. (ed.) (1997). Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Blachman, B. A., Ball, E. W., Black, R. & Tangel, D. M. (2000). Road to the code: A phonological awareness program for young children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Bowers, P. G. (1993). Text reading rereading: Predictors of fluency beyond word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P. G. (1995). Tracing symbol naming speed's unique contributions to reading disabilities over time. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P. G. & Swanson, L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, S. (1997). Ability to encode phonological representations: An underlying problem for poor readers. In Blachman, B. (ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brady, S. (2004). Terminology matters: Sorting out the ‘Phon’ words in dyslexia. In Joshi, M. (ed.), Myths, misconceptions, and some practical applications. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.Google Scholar
Brady, S. & Shankweiler, D. (eds) (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R. & Ashley, L. (2000). Effects of pre-school phoneme identity training after six years: Average benefits but no vaccination effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 659–67.CrossRef
Catts, H., Fey, M., Zhang, X. & Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(4), 331–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denckla, M. & Rudel, R. G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doehring, D. (1968). Patterns of impairment in specific reading disability. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 135–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C. (1996). Early linguistic abilities and reading development: A review and a hypothesis about underlying differences in distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 453–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. W. (1980). Learning and problem solving as the development of organized behavior. Journal of Structural Learning, 6, 253–67.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. W., Yan, Z. & Stewart, J. (2003). Adult cognitive development: Dynamics in the developmental web. In Valsiner, J. & Connolly, K. (eds), Handbook of developmental psychology, 491–516. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ganske, K. (2000). Word journeys: Assessment-guided phonics, spelling, and vocabulary instruction. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2002). Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, P. B. & Walsh, M. A. (1991). Chinese, Phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher of English. In Brady, S. A. and Shankweiler, D. P. (eds), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman, 199–210. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Katz, W., Curtiss, S. & Tallal, P. (1992). Rapid automatized naming and gesture by normal and language-impaired children. Brain and Language, 43, 623–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korhonen, T. T. (1991). Neuropsychological stability and prognosis of subgroups of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 48–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, B. A., Bourassa, D. C. & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 45–61.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. P. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D. P., Orlando, C., Harris, K. & Bell-Berti, F. (1971). Letter confusions and reversals of sequence in the beginning reader: Implications for Orton's theory of developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 7, 127–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A. & Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disbility: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manis, F. F., Doi, L. M. & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S. & Doi, L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal predication of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(2), 129–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old aproaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., Wood, , F. B., Hart, L. A. & Felton, R. H. (1998). The selective predictive values in rapid automatized naming within poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moats, L. (1995). Spelling development, disability, and instruction. Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Morris, D., Blanton, L., Blanton, W. E., Nowacek, J. & Perney, J. (1995). Teaching low-spellers at their “instructional level.”The Elementary School Journal, 96, 163–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E. & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Reading Panel Progress Report (2000). www.nationalreadingpanel.org.
Perfetti, C. A., Beck, L., Bell, L. & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.Google Scholar
Richardson, E. & DiBenedetto, B. (1985). Decoding Skills Test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Robertson, C. & Salter, W. (1997). The Phonological Awareness Test. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems, Inc.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, H. S. & Brady, S. A. (2002). Toward a common terminology for talking about speech and reading: A glossary of the “Phon” words and some related terms. Journal of Literacy Resarch, 34, 299–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, H. S. & Domgaard, R. M. (1998). An exploration of the relationship between reading and rapid serial naming speed. A presentation at the annual conference for the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, San Diego, CA, April, 1988.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C., Francis, D.,Foorman, B. & Fletcher, J. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankweiler, D. (1999). Words to meanings. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(2), 113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, L. S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torgesen, J. K. & Mathes, P. (1998). What every teacher should know about phonological awareness. Reading research anthology: The Why? of reading instruction. Novato, CA: Arena Press.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K. & Mathes, P. (2000). A basic guide to understanding, assessing, and teaching phonological awareness. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K. & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E. & Chapman, J. W. (1998). Language prediction skill, phonological reading ability, and beginning reading. In Hulme, C. & Joshi, R. M. (eds), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders, 33–67. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E. & Hoover, W. A. (1992). Cognitive and linguistic factors in learning to read. In Gough, P., Ehri, L. & Treiman, R. (eds), Reading Acquisition, 175–214. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S. G. & Tanzman, M. S. (1991). The linguistic bases of reading ability: Converting written to oral language. Text, 11, 99–133.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K. & Torgesen, J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K. & Rashotte, C. A. (1993). Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processes. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Wiederholt, J. L. & Bryant, B. R. (1992). Gray Oral Reading Test – Third Edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Wise, B. (2001). The indomitable dinosaur builder (and how she overcame her phonological deficit and learned to read instructions and other things). Journal of Special Education, 35(3), 134–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming-speed deficits in dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In Blachman, B. (ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Bally, H. & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, M. & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The “double-deficit hypothesis” for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G. & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, M. & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, P. H. & Melngailis, I. (1996). Reversing letters and reading transformed text in dyslexia: A reassessment. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. & Johnson, M. B. (1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery – Revised. Allen, TX: DLM.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×