Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:40:58.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

L. David Ritchie
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Metaphor , pp. 212 - 225
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Zahrani, A. (2008). Darwin’s metaphors revisited: Conceptual metaphors, conceptual blends, and idealized cognitive models in the theory of evolution. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 50–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anka, P. (1969). My way, first performed by Frank Sinatra on the album My Way. Music by Claude Francois and Jacques Revaux. Reprise Records.
Apter, M. J. (1991). A structural phenomenology of play. In Kerr, J. H., and Apter, M. J. (eds.), Adult play: A reversal theory approach. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
Arkivoulis, D. E. (2008). The ways of stargazing: Newtonian metaphoricity in American foreign policy. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
Armstrong, L., and Middleton, V. (1949). Baby it’s cold outside. Lyrics by Frank Loesser (1944). Recorded live; currently available on Louis Armstrong: Christmas Through the Years. Los Angeles, CA: Delta Records.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Hawthorne, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef
Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.Google ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. (2007). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal systems. In Semin, G. R., and Smith, E. R. (eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–42.Google Scholar
Berra, Y. (2011). Quoted in The Baseball Almanac. . Last accessed April 9, 2011.
Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Biria, E. (2012). Figurative language in the immigration debate: Comparing early 20th century and current U.S. debate with the contemporary European debate. Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication. Portland, OR: PSU.
Black, M. (1993). More about metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought, (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar
Blair, T. (2005). A fight we have to win. A speech to Labour’s Spring Conference. Gateshead: Sage Centre. . Last accessed September, 2006.
Blasko, D. G., and Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 295–308.Google ScholarPubMed
Bobrow, D., and Bell, S. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory and Cognition, 1, 343–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L., and Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bortfeld, H., and McGlone, M. S. (2001). The continuum of metaphor processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16 (1 and 2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., and Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112, 193–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen-Hassel, E. G., Conrad, D. M., and Hayes, M. L. (2003). Sea raiders of the American Revolution: The continental navy in European waters. Washington, DC: Naval Historical Center, p. 47. Online quote in the Naval Historical Center home page, . Last accessed April 9, 2011.Google Scholar
Boyed, R. (1979). Metaphor and theory change: What is a metaphor for? In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brasch, W. (2007). Sinking the ship of State: The presidency of George W. Bush. North Charleston, SC: Booksurge.Google Scholar
Brock, T. C., Strange, J. J., and Green, M. C. (2002). Power beyond reckoning: An introduction to narrative impact. In Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., and Brock, T. C. (eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Brône, G., and Feyaerts, K. (2004). Assessing the SSTH and GTVH: A view from cognitive linguistics. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (principal investigator). (2006). Procedure for metaphor analysis. The Metaphor Analysis Project. Milton Keynes, Bucks: Open University Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology. . Last accessed December 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18, 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2008). Metaphor and talk. In Gibbs, R.W. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–211.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2009). Metaphor and reconciliation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2011). Metaphor and reconciliation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. J., and Deignan, A. (2003). Using large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J., and Ritchie, L. D. (forthcoming). Learning from failure: Deliberative empathy in a police–community meeting.
Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. D., and Katz, A. N. (2006). On reversing the topics and vehicles of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, C. J. (1923). Selecting citizens. The North American Review, 217, 325–333.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. (1872). Jabberwocky, from Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There. . Last accessed April 9, 2011.
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (2008). Editors’ introduction. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Chiappe, D. L., and Kennedy, J. M. (2001). Literal bases for metaphor and simile. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappe, D. L., Kennedy, J. M., and Smykowski, T. (2003). Reversibility, aptness, and the conventionality of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2008). The application of conceptual metaphor theory to political discourse: Methodological questions and some possible solutions. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 241–256.Google Scholar
Cienki, A., and Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. (1967). One of Us Cannot Be Wrong. In Songs of Leonard Cohen. New York: Columbia Records.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. (1969). Songs from a room. New York: Columbia Records.Google Scholar
Coleman, C. L., and Ritchie, L. D. (2011). Examining metaphors in bio-political discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 7, 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conan Doyle, A. (1984). The case of the copper beeches. In Coyle, A. C., Great cases of Sherlock Holmes. Franklin Center, PA: Franklin Library, pp. 205–233.Google Scholar
Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, T. (1906). The medico-economic aspect of the immigration problem. The North American Review, 576, 731–740.Google Scholar
Davenport, J., and Cooley, E. (1956). Fever. Fort Knox Music.Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A., and Semino, E. (2010). Corpus techniques for metaphor analysis. In Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Dickinson, E. (1960). Because I could not stop for Death. In Williams, O. (ed.), Immortal poems of the English Language. New York: Washington Square Press, p. 443.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Everts, E. (2003). Identifying a particular family humor style: A sociolinguistic discourse analysis. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 16, 369–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagen, R. (1995). Animal play, games of angels, biology, and Brian. In Pellegrini, A. D. (ed.), The future of play theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the contributions of Brian Sutton-Smith. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feldman, J. A. (2006). From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fine, G. A., and DeSoucey, M. (2005). Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flor, M., and Hadar, U. (2005). The production of metaphoric expressions in spontaneous speech: A controlled-setting experiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R. (1923). Stopping by woods on a snowy evening. In Lathem, E. C. (ed.), The Poetry of Robert Frost. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Frost, R. (1960). The road not taken. In Williams, O. (ed.), Immortal poems of the English language. New York: Washington Square Press, p. 504.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., and Bowdle, B. F. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., and Clement, C. (1988). Evidence for relational selectivity in the interpretation of analogy and metaphor. In Bower, G. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic, pp. 307–358.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., Keysar, B., Robertson, R. W., and Werner, N. K. (2001). The role of suppression and enhancement in understanding metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 433–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). Figurative thought and figurative language. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 411–446.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 347–358.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 21, 434–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., and Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., and Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 21, 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (1997). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 919–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., and Zur, A. (2004). Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–83.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., and Bookin, H. A. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., and Haught, C. (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind and Language, 21, 360–378.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., and Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., and Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–424.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Keysar, B., and McGlone, M. S. (1992). Metaphor understanding and accessing conceptual schema: Reply to Gibbs (1992). Psychological Review, 99, 578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., and McGlone, M. S. (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1541–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., and Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M. R., and Goldvarg, Y. (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Memory and Symbol, 16, 277–294.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E. (1997). THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Taub, S., and Morgan, P. (1996). Primitive and compound metaphors. In Goldberg, A. (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 177–187.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Olde, B., and Klettke, B. (2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories? In Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., and Brock, T. C. (eds.), Narrative impact: social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 229–262.Google Scholar
Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., and Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, M. C., and Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., and Brock, T. C. (eds.), Narrative impact: social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 315–342.Google Scholar
Grofman, B. (1989). Richard Nixon as Pinocchio, Richard II, and Santa Claus: The use of allusion in political satire. The Journal of Politics, 51, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruner, C. W. (1997). The game of humor: A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Haider, M. (2011). Ship of state needs more women at the helm. . Last accessed December 7, 2011.
Harris-Lacewell, M. V. (2004). Barbershops, Bibles, and BET: Everyday talk and Black political thought. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haught, C., and Glucksberg, S. (2004). When old sharks are not old pros: Metaphors are not similes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN.
Hemingway, E. (1924). In our time. Paris: Three Mountains Press. [Subsequently reissued by Scribners’ in 1959 and 1969.]Google Scholar
Hemingway, E. (1987). The complete short stories of Ernest Hemingway. New York: Charles Scribners’.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., and Marra, M. (2002). Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honohan, I. (2008). Metaphors of solidarity. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
Howe, J. (2008). Argument is argument: An essay on conceptual metaphor and verbal dispute. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens; a study of the play-element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., and Adams, R. B., Jr. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Indurkhya, B. (1999). Creativity of metaphor in perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 621–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, A. N., and Taylor, T. E. (2008). The journeys of life: Examining a conceptual metaphor with semantic and episodic memory recall. Metaphor and Symbol, 23: 148–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keats, J. (1962). Poems and selected letters. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Kerr, J. A., and Apter, M. J. (eds.) (1991). Adult play: A reversal theory approach. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Keysar, B., and Bly, B. M. (1999). Swimming against the current: Do idioms reflect conceptual structure?Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1559–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., and Glucksberg, S. (1992). Metaphor and communication. Poetics Today, 13(4), 633–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (2008). How the mind computes the meaning of metaphor: A simulation based on LSA. In Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
Klatsky, R. L., Pellegrino, J. W., McCloskey, B. P., and Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B., and Wish, M. (1981). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA and London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–251.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In Holland, D., and Quinn, N. (eds.), Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–221.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Sweetser, E. (1994). Forward to Fauconnier, G., Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., and Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lear, E. (1871). The owl and the pussy-cat. Available online on the Edward Lear homepage, . Last accessed April 9, 2011.
Lieber, J., and Wheeler, B. E. (1963). Jackson. Nashville, TN: Kapp Records.
Louwerse, M. M. (2007). Symbolic or embodied representations: A case for symbol interdependency. In Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., and Kintsch, W. (eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 107–120.Google Scholar
Maalej, Z. (2004). Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, F. (2005). The competent horseman in a horseless world: Observations on a conventional metaphor in Spanish and English. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, E., and Ritchie, L. D. (2004). The concept of shinyuu in Japan: A replication of and comparison to Cole and Bradac’s study on U.S. friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 579–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In Macedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. A. (2007). The Psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
McCanlies, T. (Director) (2003). Second-hand lions. New Line Cinema.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, A. J. (1903). The American’s distrust of the immigrant. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 230–236.Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., and Robinson, M. D. (2005). The metaphorical representation of affect. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, B. (2003). Metaphor, science and the media [online]. . Last accessed September, 2008.
Nerlich, B., Johnson, S., and Clarke, D. D. (2003). The first ‘designer baby’: The role of narratives, cliches and metaphors in the year 2000 media debate. Science as Culture, 12, 471–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., and Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishishiba, M., and Ritchie, L. D. (2000). The concept of trustworthiness: A cross-cultural comparison between Japanese and U.S. business people. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(4), 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R. 2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1333–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obama, B. (2008) “A More Perfect Union,” Philadelphia, PA, March 18, 2008.CrossRef
O’Brien, G. V. (2003). Indigestible food, conquering hordes, and waste materials: Metaphors of immigrants and early immigration restriction debate in the United States. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obst, P. (2003). Grief as a journey. . Last accessed May 10, 2011.
Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor, language, and thought. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Z., and Kosicki, G. M. (1997). Priming and media impact on the evaluations of the president’s performance. Communication Research, 24, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papenfuss, M. (2011). Pirate party storms German ship of State. . Posted September 20, 2011. Last accessed December 7, 2011.
Perlmutter, D. D. (2002). On incongruities and logical inconsistencies in humor: The delicate balance. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierotti, J. (1973). President Richard Nixon as Pinocchio – cartoon drawing. New York Post, June 8. The Granger Collection, Image No. 0085370. . Last accessed October 29, 2011.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Plester, B. A., and Sayers, J. (2007). “Taking the piss”: Functions of banter in the IT industry. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 20,157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–39. [The letters stand for the first names of the ten co-authors.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., and Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on reader’s cognitive responses. Communication Research 24, 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Boston, MA: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Raskin, V., and Attardo, S. (1994). Non-literalness and non-bona-fide in language: An approach to formal and computational treatments of humor. Pragmatics and Cognition, 2(1), 31–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. J. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edn.). Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–201.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ringmar, E. (2008). Metaphors of social order. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 57–68.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (1986). Shannon and Weaver: Unravelling the paradox of information. Communication Research, 13, 278–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (1991). Communication concepts 2: Information. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2003a). Categories and similarities: A note on circularity. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2003b). “ARGUMENT IS WAR” – Or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2004). Lost in “Conceptual Space”: Metaphors of Conceptual Integration. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2005). Frame-shifting in humor and irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2006). Context and connection in metaphor. Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2008a). Gateshead revisited: The integrative function of ambiguous metaphors in a tricky political situation. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2008b). X IS A JOURNEY: Embodied simulation in metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2009a). Relevance and simulation in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2009b). Distributed cognition and play in the quest for the double helix. In Pishwa, H. (ed.), Language and social cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 289–323.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2009c). Review of Metaphor and Gesture edited by Alan Cienki and Cornelia Mueller. Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 121–123.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2010a). “Everybody goes down”: Metaphors, stories, and simulations in conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2010b). Metaphors and simulations in conversational storytelling. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM), Amsterdam, June 30 – July 3, 2010.
Ritchie, L. D. (2011a). “Justice is blind”: A model for analyzing metaphor transformations and narratives in actual discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2011b). “You’re lying to Jesus!” Humor and play in a discussion about homelessness. Humor 24, 481–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2011c). Why the block is the block: Reinforcing community through casual conversation. Metaphor and the Social World, 1, 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D. (2012). Metaphor and stories in discourse about personal and social change. In Wagoner, B., Jensen, E., and Oldmeadow, J. (eds.), Culture and social change: Transforming society through the power of ideas. A volume in Advances in Cultural Psychology, Valsiner, J. (series ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., and Dyhouse, V. (2008). FINE AS FROG’S HAIR: Three models for the development of meaning in figurative language. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., and Schell, C. (2009). “The ivory tower” on an “unstable foundation”: Playful language, humor, and metaphor in the negotiation of scientists’ identities. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. (1924). Slow poison. The Saturday Evening Post, 196(31), 8–9, 54, 58.Google Scholar
Sandburg, C. (1919). Fog. . Last accessed April 15, 2011.
Sasson, T. (1995). Crime talk: How citizens construct a social problem. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In Wyer, R. S. (ed.), Advances in social cognition, vol. VIII: Knowledge and memory: The real story. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–86.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C., and Berman, T. R. (2002). The pervasive role of stories in knowledge and action. In Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., and Brock, T. C. (eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. G. (2008). Exploring the metaphorical (de-)construction of legitimacy: A comparison of legitimation discourses in American and British newspapers. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought, (2nd edn. [1st edn. 1979]). Cambridge University Press, pp. 137–163.Google Scholar
Schubert, T. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as conceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, T. W., Waldzus, S., and Seibt, B. (2008). The embodiment of power and communalism in space and bodily contact. In Semin, G., and Smith, E. R. (eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. (Chapter 7.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1993). Metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edn. [1st edn. 1979]), pp. 83–111. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2010). Descriptions of pain, metaphor, and embodied simulations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, W. (1961). When forty winters shall besiege thy brow (Sonnet 2). In Bush, D., and Harbage, A. (eds.), Shakespeare’s sonnets. New York: Penguin, p. 24.Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. (2010). Embodied cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Sharifian, F., Dirven, R., Yu, N., and Neiemier, S. (eds.) (2008). Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. New York: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRef
Shelley, M. W. (1969). Frankenstein; or The modern Prometheus. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherzer, J. (2002). Speech play and verbal art. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, G. (1969). Turtle Island. New York: New Directions.
Spender, S. (1955). Seascape. Collected poems, 1928–1953. New York: Random House. Available online: . Last accessed April 15, 2011.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. ([1986] 1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–105.Google Scholar
Span, Steeleye (1975). Dance with me. (Traditional folk ballad.) From the album All Around My Hat, London: Chrysalis Records.Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23: 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenvoll, D. (2008). Slippery slopes in political discourse. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 28–40.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. (1967). The play theory of mass communication. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sutton-Smith, B. (1995). Conclusion: The persuasive rhetorics of play. In Pellegrini, A. D. (ed.), The future of play theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the contributions of Brian Sutton-Smith. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 275–296.Google Scholar
Taylor, S., and Littleton, K. (2006). Biographies in talk: A narrative-discursive research approach. Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(1), 22–38.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., and Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE 6(2): e16782. doi:. . Last accessed May 3, 2011.
Thomas, D. (2011). “Go not gentle into that good night.” . Last accessed May 11, 2011.
Torreano, L. A., Cacciari, C., and Glucksberg, S. (2005). When dogs can fly: Level of abstraction as a cue to metaphorical use of verbs. Metaphor and Symbol, 20, 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., and Rips, L. (1991). Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 452–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, K. (1997). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of Frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 315–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaid, J., Hull, R., Heredia, R., Gerkens, D., and Martinez, F. (2003). Getting a joke: The time course of meaning activation in verbal humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1431–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hulst, M. J. (2008). Love and life in Heart-less Town: Or, the use of metaphor in local planning. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 212–224.Google Scholar
Veale, T., and O’Donoghue, D. (2000). Computation and Blending. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 253–281.Google Scholar
Vega Moreno, R. E. (2007). Creativity and convention: The pragmatics of everyday figurative speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertessen, D., and de Landtscheer, C. L. (2008). A metaphorical election style: Use of metaphor at election time. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 271–285.Google Scholar
Vervaeke, J., and Kennedy, J. M. (1996). Metaphors in language and thought: Falsification and multiple meanings. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11(4), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Werth, P. (1999). Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Williams, L. E., and Bargh, J. A. (2008). Temperature to temperament: Warm objects alter personality impressions. Unpublished manuscript, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wilson, D., and Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind and Language, 21, 404–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., and Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In Horn, L. R., and Ward, G. (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 607–632.Google Scholar
Wilson, N., and Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanow, D. (2008). Cognition meets action: Metaphors as models of and models for. In Carver, T., and Pikalo, J. (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 225–237.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2003). Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1295–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., and Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold?Psychological Science, 19, 838–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, C.-B., and Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313: 1451–1452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zillmann, D., and Cantor, J. R. (1976). A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In Chapman, T., and Foot, H. (eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications. London: Wiley, pp. 93–115.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., and Taylor, L. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • L. David Ritchie, Portland State University
  • Book: Metaphor
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136822.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • L. David Ritchie, Portland State University
  • Book: Metaphor
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136822.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • L. David Ritchie, Portland State University
  • Book: Metaphor
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136822.013
Available formats
×