We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2024
CASE
Companies B, C and D signed an agreement to co-ordinate the pricing of their products. The general public was not informed of this. The European Commission decided that the cartel violated EU competition law and fined company B, C and D. The European Court of Justice upheld this decision.
Direct consumers of these companies want to recover their losses incurred as a result of the higher price they paid for the products sold by company B. The consumers did not resell the product to third parties, so company B cannot put forward a passing-on defence. They all demand compensation from company B. Will they receive compensation? The competitors of companies B, C and D who were not part of this cartel also demand compensation for their foregone profits as a result of this pricing policy from company B. Will they receive compensation and, if so, for what losses? And is it possible to start a collective proceeding? If so, please indicate the most important bottlenecks in this particular case.
Joint and several liability is not needed in your answer, unless it is the main obstacle to a claim; if so, please mention that briefly.
DISCUSSIONS
AUSTRIA
Matthias Dangl and Georg E Kodek
Operative Rules
The consumers will receive compensation under general tort law (§ § 1311 in conjunction with 1293 ff ACC). The action is based on the violation of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
The competitors could also demand damages they suffered as a result of a cartel. Based on the facts of the case, it is not clear to us what kind of losses they could have in mind. A more realistic scenario would be that the cartel members fixed prices at a very low level to squeeze their competitors from the market. In that case, the competitors would be entitled to damages. However, it is hard to imagine a case where both consumers and competitors suffer a loss.
A collective action (as described in the Austrian section in the procedural rules chapter) would be possible.
Legal Formants
By ‘passing on’ the loss to the consumers, the losses become infinitesimal (atomised).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
