Book contents
- Market Studies
- Market Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Multiple Pasts, Presents and Futures of Markets and Market Studies
- Part I Market Designs and Market Misfires
- Part II Post-Performative Approaches to Studying Markets
- Part III Valuation
- Part IV Markets in Motion: Places and Spaces
- Part V The Secret Life of Market Studies Methods
- Part VI Broadening the Perspectives in Market Studies
- Part VII Future (Im)Perfect Markets
- Chapter 28 Digital Platforms and (Im)Perfect Market Futures
- Chapter 29 Reconfiguring Visibility and Participation in a Digitalizing World
- Chapter 30 Market Futures and the Role of Market Studies in the Making of Circular Economies
- Chapter 31 Making Room for Care in Markets and in Market Studies
- Index
- References
Chapter 31 - Making Room for Care in Markets and in Market Studies
from Part VII - Future (Im)Perfect Markets
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2024
Book contents
- Market Studies
- Market Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: The Multiple Pasts, Presents and Futures of Markets and Market Studies
- Part I Market Designs and Market Misfires
- Part II Post-Performative Approaches to Studying Markets
- Part III Valuation
- Part IV Markets in Motion: Places and Spaces
- Part V The Secret Life of Market Studies Methods
- Part VI Broadening the Perspectives in Market Studies
- Part VII Future (Im)Perfect Markets
- Chapter 28 Digital Platforms and (Im)Perfect Market Futures
- Chapter 29 Reconfiguring Visibility and Participation in a Digitalizing World
- Chapter 30 Market Futures and the Role of Market Studies in the Making of Circular Economies
- Chapter 31 Making Room for Care in Markets and in Market Studies
- Index
- References
Summary
Where Market Studies opened the theorizing of markets to concerns of various affected publics, we propose a new shift to further destabilize understandings of what markets are and can be. This shift considers how care, as an affective, ethical, and political force, figures in markets – and, moreover, to make room for care where it may currently be absent. We draw on feminist materialist discussions of care to render explicit the ways in which care circulates in existing markets – and in Market Studies – and propose five avenues for inquiry into care and markets: care as a market object; care as a critical market maintenance practice; care as more-than-concern, more affectively, ethically, and politically committed; care as a basis to rethink market relations and construct better – fairer and more just – markets; and, finally, care as a relational force circulating between us as Market Studies researchers, the objects of our study, our workplaces, and the more-than-human worlds we belong in. We do not suggest that care is a panacea for all market ills, but offer it as an analytic of provocation – something to think with as we imagine and enact future markets.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Market StudiesMapping, Theorizing and Impacting Market Action, pp. 499 - 509Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Atkinson, S., and Ayers, A. (2010) The potential of the internet for alternative caring practices for health. Anthropology and Medicine, 17(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boltanski, L., and Thévenot, L. (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeron, T., Metz, C., and Wolf, M. (2021) They don’t care: how financial investors extract profits from care homes. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M. (2010) Economization, part 2: a research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., and Muniesa, F. (2005) Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., and Roth, A. E. (2021) The design and performation of markets: a discussion. AMS Review, 11(3/4), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croon, A. (2022) Thinking with care in human–computer interaction. Feminist Theory, 23(2), 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, M. (2020) A care-infused market tale: on (not) maintaining relationships of trust in energy retrofit products. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(5), 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, M. (2021) ‘A heat pump needs a bit of care’: on maintainability and repairing gender–technology relations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 46(6), 1261–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J., and Pontille, D. (2015) Material ordering and the care of things. Science, Technology and Human Values, 40(3), 338–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J., and Geiger, S. (2010) Positioning and relating: market boundaries and the slippery identity of the marketing object. Marketing Theory, 10(3), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B., and Tronto, J. C. (1990) Toward a feminist theory of caring, in Abel, E., and Nelson, M. (eds.), Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 35–62.Google Scholar
Friese, C. (2013) Realizing potential in translational medicine: the uncanny emergence of care as science. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friese, C. (2019) Intimate entanglements in the animal house: caring for and about mice. The Sociological Review, 67(2), 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Finch, J. (2016) Promissories and pharmaceutical patents: agencing markets through public narratives. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2018) Market failures and market framings: can a market be transformed from the inside? Organization Studies, 39(10), 1357–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Gross, N. (2024) Tech sharing, not tech hoarding: Covid-19, global solidarity, and the failed responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry. Organization, 31(3), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., Harrison, D., Kjellberg, H., and Mallard, A. (eds.) (2014) Concerned Markets: Economic Ordering for Multiple Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and Kjellberg, H. (2021) Market mash ups: the process of combinatorial market innovation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, S., and McMahon, A. (2023) An institutional analysis of the landscape and proliferation of proposals for global vaccine equity for Covid-19: too many cooks or too many recipes? Journal of Medical Ethics, 49(8), 583–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008) Diverse economies: performative practices for other worlds. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez Sánchez, I. (2022) Dwelling as politics: an emancipatory praxis of/through care and space in everyday life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 40(3), 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (2014) Speculative fabulations for technoculture’s generations: taking care of unexpected country, in Kirksey, E. (ed.), The Multispecies Salon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 242–262.Google Scholar
Horton, A. (2019) Financialization and non-disposable women: real estate, debt and labour in UK care homes. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1), 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latimer, J., and López Gómez, D. (2019) Intimate entanglements: affects, more-than-human intimacies and the politics of relations in science and technology. The Sociological Review, 67(2), 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loza, O. and Geiger, S. (forthcoming) Technoliberal market visions, maintenance, and care. Journal of Cultural Economy, in press.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Myers, N., and Vizeu, A. (2015) The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45, 625–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, D. (2002) Turning Callon the right way up. Economy and Society, 31(2), 218–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, A., Moser, I., and Pols, J. (eds.) (2010) Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. (2015) Unsettling care: troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 717–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onyas, W. I. (2023) Enacting overlapping exchanges to address market concerns: evidence on sustainable and conventional coffee markets in Uganda. Marketing Theory, 23(3), 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orupabo, J. (2022) Enacting efficient care within a context of rationalisation. The Sociological Review, 70(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossandón, J., and Pallesen, T. (2021) The new economic sociologist and the market test (or how to intervene in a market-intervention). Paper presented at 6th Interdisciplinary Market Studies Workshop, Grenoble, 3 June.Google Scholar
Ossandón, J., and Ureta, S. (2019) Problematizing markets: market failures and the government of collective concerns. Economy and Society, 48(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pols, J. (2015) Towards an empirical ethics in care: relations with technologies in health care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 18(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, E. R., and Bergan, T. L. (2019) Care and resistance to neoliberal reform in social housing. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(4), 426–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prainsack, B., and Wagenaar, H. (2021) Markets, morals, and the collective good after Covid-19, in Geiger, S. (ed.), Healthcare Activism: Markets, Morals, and the Collective Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012) ‘Nothing comes without its world’: thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2015) Making time for soil: technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 691–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Roscoe, P., and Loza, O. (2019) The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies). Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 215–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, J. C. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. C. (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Wiel, L. (2020) The speculative turn in IVF: egg freezing and the financialization of fertility. New Genetics and Society, 39(3), 306–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidolov, S., Geiger, S., and Stendahl, E. (2023) Affective resonance and durability in political organizing: the case of patients who hack. Organization Studies, 44(9), 1413–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar