Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T01:43:03.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2025

Quentin Skinner
Affiliation:
Queen Mary, University of London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Liberty as Independence
The Making and Unmaking of a Political Ideal
, pp. 281 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

A complete answer to Mr Wesley’s observations upon Dr. Price’s essay on civil liberty (1776). Newcastle.Google Scholar
A conference desired by the Lords … concerning the rights and privileges of the subjects (1642). London.Google Scholar
A constitutional defence of government (1782). London.Google Scholar
A declaration by the representatives of the united colonies [on] the causes and necessity of their taking up arms (1775). Philadelphia.Google Scholar
A defence of the minority (1764). London.Google Scholar
A dialogue on the principles of the constitution (1776). London.Google Scholar
A general introduction on political liberty in British liberties (1767). London, pp. ilxxix.Google Scholar
A letter to Dr Price (1777). London.Google Scholar
A letter to the Rev. Dr Cooper on the origin of civil government (1777). London.Google Scholar
A letter to the Rev. Dr Richard Price (1776). London.Google Scholar
A plain and candid statement of facts respecting the natural and civil rights of man (1790). Norwich.Google Scholar
A Proclamation (1689). London.Google Scholar
A supplement to the remarks on a pamphlet entitled Considerations on the late Bill for paying the national debt (1754). Dublin.Google Scholar
[Adams, Samuel ] (2003). A state of the rights of the colonists in Tracts of the American Revolution 1763–1776, ed. Jensen, Merrill, Indianapolis, pp. 233–55.Google Scholar
Agutter, William (1792). Christian politics, or the origin of power and the grounds of subordination, London.Google Scholar
Alley, Jerom (1792). Observations on the government and constitution of Great Britain, Dublin.Google Scholar
Ames, Richard (1692). Liberty or slavery, London.Google Scholar
An address to the electors of Great Britain (1747). London.Google Scholar
An answer to a letter (1699). London.Google Scholar
An appeal to reason and justice in behalf of the British constitution (1778). London.Google Scholar
An essay on liberty and independency (1747). London.Google Scholar
An excellent sermon in defence of passive obedience and non-resistance (1733). London.Google Scholar
An inquiry into the original and consequences of the public debt (1753). Edinburgh.Google Scholar
[Anderton, William ] (1693). Remarks upon the present confederacy and late revolution in England, London.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1968). ‘What is freedom?’ in Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought, New York, pp. 143–71.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1598). Aristotle’s Politics or Discourses of government, London.Google Scholar
[Arnall, William] (1731). The case of the opposition stated between the Craftsman and the people, London.Google Scholar
[Arnall, William] (1735). Opposition no proof of patriotism, London.Google Scholar
Astell, Mary (1996). Astell: Political writings, ed. Springborg, Patricia. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Atwood, William] (1690). The fundamental constitution of the English government, London.Google Scholar
Austin, John (1995). The province of jurisprudence determined, ed. Rumble, Wilfrid E., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azo of Bologna, (1966). Lectura super codicem, ed. Viora, Mario E., Turin.Google Scholar
Ball, Nathaniel (1746). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
Ballard, Reeve (1745). The necessity of magistracy from the vices of mankind, London.Google Scholar
Ballard, Reeve (1746). The rule of obedience, London.Google Scholar
Barclay, William (1600). De regno et regali potestate adversus Buchananum, Brutum, Boucherium et reliquos monarchomachos, Paris.Google Scholar
Barnard, Thomas (1743). Tyranny and slavery in matters of religion cautioned against, London.Google Scholar
Barr, John (1746). A sermon, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Barret, John (1678). God’s love to man, and man’s duty towards God, London.Google Scholar
Bartlam, John (1794). An essay on liberty, n.p.Google Scholar
Bate, James (1734). The advantages of a national observance of divine and human laws, London.Google Scholar
Beauty’s triumph, or the superiority of the fair sex invincibly proved (1745). London.Google Scholar
Bedford, Arthur (1717). The doctrine of obedience and non-resistance … stated and vindicated, London.Google Scholar
Bellinger, Charles (1746). The duty of thanksgiving, London.Google Scholar
[Belsham, William] (1790). An essay on the African slave trade, London.Google Scholar
Benet, Gilbert (1746). Jotham’s parable, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy (1988). A fragment on government, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A., introd. Ross Harrison, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy (2017). The correspondence, volume I, 1752–76, ed. Sprigge, Timothy, London.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (2002). ‘Two concepts of liberty’ (1958) in Liberty, ed. Henry Hardy, Oxford, pp. 166217.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas (1766). A discourse on the study of jurisprudence and the civil law, Oxford.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William (2016). Commentaries on the laws of England: Book I: Of the rights of persons, ed. Lemmings, David, Oxford.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Thomas (1746). The dangers of the late rebellion and our happy deliverance considered, London.Google Scholar
Blount, Charles (1693). King William and Queen Mary conquerors, London.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean (1962). The six books of a commonweal, ed. McRae, Kenneth Douglas, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolingbroke, Henry St John, Viscount (1752). Remarks on the history of England, Dublin.Google Scholar
Bolingbroke, Henry St John, Viscount (1997). Bolingbroke: Political writings, ed. Armitage, David. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Benjamin (1791). Observations on the Right Hon. Edmund Burke’s pamphlet, London.Google Scholar
Bracton, Henry de (1569). De legibus et consuetudinibus Angliae libri quinque, London.Google Scholar
Bradford, John (1746). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
Brekell, John (1746). Liberty and loyalty; or, a defence and explication of subjection to the present government upon the principles of the revolution, London.Google Scholar
Briscoe, John (1694). A discourse on the late funds, London.Google Scholar
Brown, John (1746). The mutual connexion between religious truth and civil freedom, London.Google Scholar
Brown, John (1765). Thoughts on civil liberty, on licentiousness and faction, Newcastle.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund (2001). Reflections on the revolution in France, ed. Clark, J. C. D., Stanford.Google Scholar
Burlamaqui, Jean-Jacques (1752). The principles of politic law, trans. Thomas Nugent, London.Google Scholar
Burnet, Gilbert (1689). A pastoral letter, London.Google Scholar
By the king, a Proclamation (1792). London.Google Scholar
Carr, George (1746). A sermon preached at the English chapel in Edinburgh, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
[Cartwright, John] (1774). American independence the interest and glory of Great Britain, London.Google Scholar
[Cartwright, John] (1776). Take your choice! London.Google Scholar
Chandler, Mary (1738). The description of Bath, London.Google Scholar
Chandler, Samuel (1745). The danger and duty of good men under the present unnatural invasion, London.Google Scholar
Chandler, Samuel (1746). National deliverances just reasons for public gratitude and joy, London.Google Scholar
[Chapone, Sarah] (1735).The hardships of the English law in relation to wives, London.Google Scholar
Chauncy, Angel (1747). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
[Chudleigh, Mary] (1701). The ladies defence, London.Google Scholar
Churton, Ralph (1790). The will of God the ground and principle of civil as well as religious obedience, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cicero, (1534). The paradoxe, trans. Robert Whitinton, London.Google Scholar
Cicero, (1556). Marcus Tullius Cicero’s three books of duties, trans. Nicolas Grimalde, London.Google Scholar
Cicero, (1913). De officiis, trans. Walter Miller, London.Google Scholar
Cicero, (1942). De oratore, ed. and trans. Sutton, E. W. and Rackham, H., 2 vols., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Civil liberty asserted (1776). London.Google Scholar
Clarke, Joseph (1746). Reformation of manners the best thanksgiving, London.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Thomas (1786). An essay on the slavery and commerce of the human species, London.Google Scholar
Cobbett, William (1807). The parliamentary history of England, volume 2: 1625–1642, London.Google Scholar
Cobbett, William (1813a). The parliamentary history of England, volume 15: 1753–1765, London.Google Scholar
Cobbett, William (1813b). The parliamentary history of England, volume 16: 1765–1771, London.Google Scholar
Cobbett, William (1817). The parliamentary history of England, volume 29: 1791–1792, London.Google Scholar
Cocks, John Somers (1791). Patriotism and the love of liberty defended, London.Google Scholar
Coleridge, John (1777). Government not originally proceeding from human agency but divine institution, London.Google Scholar
Coney, Thomas (1731). The happiness or misery of a nation dependent upon the principles and conduct of its governors, London.Google Scholar
Cooper, Samuel (1791). The first principles of civil and ecclesiastical government delineated, Yarmouth.Google Scholar
Courtville, Ralph (1738). Memoirs of the life and administration of William Cecil Baron Burleigh … including a parallel between the state of government then and now, London.Google Scholar
Cramond, Robert and Cramond, Hercules (1789). A letter to the National Assembly, London.Google Scholar
Cursory remarks on Dr Price’s Observations on the nature of civil liberty (1776). London.Google Scholar
Dalton, Michael (1746). The country Justice, London.Google Scholar
Defoe, Daniel (1989). Moll Flanders, ed. Blewett, David, London.Google Scholar
Defoe, Daniel (2001). Robinson Crusoe, ed. Richetti, John, London.Google Scholar
[Dickinson, John] (1768). Letters from a farmer in Pennsylvania, Boston.Google Scholar
Digesta (1902). Corpus iuris civilis, vol. 1, ed. Krueger, Paul and Mommsen, Theodore, Berlin, pp. 1873.Google Scholar
Dobson, Joshua (1747). Religious gratitude explained and religious and civil liberty … recommended, London.Google Scholar
Dodd, Charles (1777). The Contrast: or Strictures on select parts of Dr Price’s Additional observations, London.Google Scholar
Dodsley, Robert (1730). The footman’s friendly advice to his brethren of the livery, London.Google Scholar
[Drake, Judith] (1696). An essay in defence of the female sex, London.Google Scholar
Draper, Richard (1763). An authentic account of the proceedings against John Wilkes, Esq, London.Google Scholar
[Dulany, Daniel] (1965). Considerations on the propriety of imposing taxes in the British colonies in Pamphlets of the American Revolution 1750–1776, ed. Bailyn, Bernard, Cambridge, MA, vol. 1, pp. 610–58.Google Scholar
Dupont, John (1747). The peculiar happiness and excellency of the British nation considered and explained, London.Google Scholar
English liberty in some cases worse than French slavery (1748). London.Google Scholar
Equality no liberty (1792). London.Google Scholar
Equiano, Olaudah (1789). The interesting narrative of the life of Olaudah Equiano, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
[Evans, Robert] (1810). Six letters of Publicola on the liberty of the subject, London.Google Scholar
Experience preferable to theory (1776). London.Google Scholar
Fawcett, John (1808). The nature and extent of Christian liberty, London.Google Scholar
Fawel, John (1793). Due subordination true freedom, Wigan.Google Scholar
[Ferguson, Adam] (1776). Remarks on a pamphlet lately published by Dr Price, London.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry (1999). Joseph Andrews and Shamela, ed. Hawley, Judith, London.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry (2005). The history of Tom Jones, a foundling, ed. Keymer, Thomas and Wakely, Alice, London.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Andrew (1997). A discourse of government with relation to militias in Political works, ed. Robertson, John, Cambridge, pp. 131.Google Scholar
Foot, Jesse (1792). A defence of the planters in the West Indies, London.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Sir John (1616). De laudibus legum Angliae (In commendation of the laws of England), trans. Robert Mulcaster, London.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Sir John (1997). On the laws and governance of England, ed. Lockwood, Shelley, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fothergill, George (1737). The danger of excess in the pursuit of liberty, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fox, William (1829). The providence of God in the progress of religious liberty, London.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Thomas (1792). Of slavery and the slave trade, London.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Thomas (1798). The principles of moral philosophy investigated and applied to the constitution of civil society, 4th ed., London.Google Scholar
Goddard, William (1819). On the use and abuse of religious and civil liberty, Andover.Google Scholar
[Henry, Goodricke] (1776). Observations on Dr Price’s theory and principles of civil liberty and government, York.Google Scholar
Goold, Thomas (1791). A vindication of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke’s Reflections, Dublin.Google Scholar
Goslicki, Wawrzynic (1598). The counsellor, London.Google Scholar
[Gray, John] (1774). The right of the British legislature to tax the American colonies, London.Google Scholar
Gray, John (1777). Doctor Price’s notions of the nature of civil liberty, London.Google Scholar
Griffin, John (1809). Briton’s jubilee, or the duties of subjects to their kind and the blessings of liberty, London.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1718). De iure belli ac pacis, London.Google Scholar
Hales, William (1794). The scripture doctrine of political government and political liberty, Dublin.Google Scholar
Halley, George (1689). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
Hargrave, Francis (1772). An argument in the case of James Somerset, London.Google Scholar
Harrington, James (1992). The commonwealth of Oceana and a system of politics, ed. Pocock, J. G. A., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Thomas (1745). Popery and slavery displayed, London.Google Scholar
[Harrison, Thomas ] (1690). Political aphorisms, London.Google Scholar
Head, Erasmus (1747). Loyalty recommended on proper principles, London.Google Scholar
Heineccius, J. G. (1763). A methodical system of universal law, trans. George Turnbull, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
Henriques, Jacob (1749). The petition and proposal … for paying the national debt, London.Google Scholar
Herring, Thomas (1745). A sermon … on occasion of the present rebellion in Scotland, London.Google Scholar
[Hervey, John] (1730). Observations on the writings of The Craftsman, London.Google Scholar
[Hervey, John] (1732). The public virtue of former times and the present age compared, London.Google Scholar
[Hervey, John] (1734). Ancient and modern liberty stated and compared, London.Google Scholar
Hey, Richard (1776). Observations on the nature of civil liberty and the principles of government, London.Google Scholar
Hey, Richard (1792). Happiness and rights, York.Google Scholar
Hickes, George (1689). A letter … in defence of the history of passive obedience, London.Google Scholar
Hoadly, Benjamin (1745 [1708]). The happiness of the present establishment and unhappiness of absolute monarchy, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1969). The elements of law natural and politic, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand, 2nd ed., introd. M. M. Goldsmith, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the citizen, ed. and trans. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (2012). Leviathan, ed. Malcolm, Noel, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Hooke, Andrew (1750). An essay on the national debt, London.Google Scholar
[Hopkins, Stephen] (1965). The rights of colonies examined in Pamphlets of the American Revolution 1750–1776, ed. Bailyn, Bernard, Cambridge, MA, vol. 1, pp. 506–22.Google Scholar
Howard, Leonard (1745). The advantages of a free people and ill consequences of licentiousness considered, London.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1741). Essays moral and political, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1742). Essays moral and political, volume II, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1748). Three essays moral and political, never before published, London.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1752). Political discourses, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1764). Essays and treatises on several subjects, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
Ibbetson, James (1746). Public virtue the great cause of the happiness and prosperity of any people, York.Google Scholar
[Jefferson, Thomas] (2003). A summary view of the rights of British America in Tracts of the American Revolution 1763–1776, ed. Jensen, Merrill, Indianapolis, pp. 256–76.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert C. and Cole, Maija Jansson (eds.) (1977). Commons Debates 1628, volume 2, New Haven.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert C., Keeler, Mary Frear, Cole, Maija Jansson and Bidwell, William B. (eds.) (1977). Commons Debates 1628, volume 3, New Haven.Google Scholar
[Johnson, Samuel] (1775). Taxation no tyranny, London.Google Scholar
[Jones, Erasmus] (1740). Luxury, pride and vanity the bane of the English nation, London.Google Scholar
Jones, John (1792). The reason of man, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Kerrich, Samuel (1746). A sermon of … public thanksgiving, Cambridge.Google Scholar
[Kettlewell, John] (1691). Christianity, a doctrine of the cross, London.Google Scholar
Lane, William (1746). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
Lay, Benjamin (1737). All slave-keepers … Apostates, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Liberty and property (1745). London.Google Scholar
[Lind, John] (1776). Three letters to Dr Price, London.Google Scholar
Livy, (1600). The Romane history, trans. Philemon Holland, London.Google Scholar
Livy, (1919). Livy I, Books I and II, trans. B. O. Foster, London.Google Scholar
Livy, (1922). Livy II, Books III and IV, trans. B. O. Foster, London.Google Scholar
[Locke, John] (1690). Two treatises of government, London.Google Scholar
Lofft, Capel (1790). Remarks on the letter of the Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke concerning the revolution in France, London.Google Scholar
[Logan, William] (1746). Superiorities display’d: or, Scotland’s grievance, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Loyalty to our king the safety of our country (1745). London.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Catharine (2023). Catharine Macaulay: Political writings, ed. Skjönsberg, Max, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1636). Machiavel’s Discourses, trans. Edward Dacres, London.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James (2006). Vindiciae Gallicae and other writings on the French revolution, ed. Winch, Donald, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Maddox, Isaac (1746). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
[Mandeville, Bernard] (1723). The fable of the bees, or private vices publick benefits, 2nd ed., London.Google Scholar
Markham, William (1777). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
May, Thomas (1690). An epitome of English history, London.Google Scholar
Mays, Christopher (1746). A sermon, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Milton, John (1660). The ready and easy way to establish a free commonwealth, London.Google Scholar
Milton, John (1953). Commonplace book in Complete prose works, ed. Wolfe, Don M., vol. 1: 1624–1642, New Haven, pp. 362513.Google Scholar
Milton, John (1991). John Milton: Political writings, ed. Dzelzainis, Martin, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, John (1998). The complete poems, ed. Leonard, John, London.Google Scholar
[Molesworth, Robert] (1694). An account of Denmark, London.Google Scholar
[Molesworth, Robert] (1721). Franco-Gallia: Or an account of the ancient free state of France and most other parts of Europe before the loss of their liberties, 2nd ed., London.Google Scholar
Montague, Basil (1819). Some thoughts upon liberty and the rights of Englishmen, London.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat (1989). The spirit of the laws, ed. and trans. Cohler, Anne, Miller, Basia and Stone, Harold, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morell, Thomas (1754). Judas Macchabaeus: A sacred drama, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mortimer, Thomas (1772). The Elements of commerce, politics and finances, London.Google Scholar
Murdin, Cornelius (1779). Three sermons, Southampton.Google Scholar
Mynors, Willoughby (1716). True loyalty: Or non-resistance the only support of monarchy, London.Google Scholar
Myonnet, John (1734). The nature and advantages of civil liberty, London.Google Scholar
Nares, Robert (1792). Principles of government deduced from reason, supported by English experience and opposed to French errors, London.Google Scholar
Nares, Robert (1793). Principles of government adapted to general instruction and use, London.Google Scholar
National spirit considered as a natural source of political liberty (1758). London.Google Scholar
Nedham, Marchamont (1656). The excellency of a free-state, London.Google Scholar
Nedham, Marchamont (1969). The case of the commonwealth of England stated, ed. Knachel, Philip A., Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Nichols, Nicholas (1746). A sermon, Hull.Google Scholar
Osborne, George (1735). Subjection to principalities, powers, and magistrates, explain’d and enforc’d, London.Google Scholar
Oswald, John (1793). Review of the constitution of Great Britain, London.Google Scholar
Otis, James (1965). The rights of the British colonies asserted and proved in Pamphlets of the American Revolution 1750–1776, ed. Bailyn, Bernard, vol. 1, Cambridge, MA, pp. 419–82.Google Scholar
[Overton, Richard] (1646). An arrow against all tyrants and tyranny, n.p.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas (2000). Thomas Paine: Political writings, ed. Kuklick, Bruce, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paley, William (1785). The principles of moral and political philosophy, London.Google Scholar
[Parker, Henry] (1642). Observations upon some of his Majesty’s late answers and expresses, London.Google Scholar
Parkin, Thomas (1828). An exposure of religious and civil despotism, London.Google Scholar
Parsons, Lawrence (1793). Thoughts on liberty and equality, London.Google Scholar
Patrick, Simon (1689). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
Pearce, Samuel (1827). The oppressive … nature and tendency of the Corporation and Test Acts exposed, London.Google Scholar
Peckard, Peter (1783). The nature and extent of civil and religious liberty, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pendlebury, William (1746). The errors and mischiefs of popery and the fatal consequences of arbitrary and despotic power, York.Google Scholar
Perceval, John, Earl of Egmont (1763). An essay on the means of discharging the public debt, London.Google Scholar
[Petyt, George] (1690). Lex parliamentaria, or a treatise of the law and custom of Parliaments, London.Google Scholar
Pickering, Danby (1765). The statutes at large, volume 19, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Piers, Henry (1746). Religion and liberty rescued from superstition and slavery, Bristol.Google Scholar
Plowden, Francis (1824). Human subordination, London.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander (2011). The rape of the lock and other major writings, ed. Damrosch, Leo, London.Google Scholar
Potter, Francis (1745). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
Price, Richard (1991). Richard Price: Political writings, ed. Thomas, D. O., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph (1791). Letters to the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Birmingham.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph (1993). The present state of liberty in Joseph Priestley: Political writings, ed. Miller, Peter, Cambridge, pp. 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proceedings of the Association for preserving liberty and property against republicans and levellers (1793). London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1729). Of the law of nature and nations, trans. Basil Kennett [with the notes of Jean Barbeyrac], 4th ed., London.Google Scholar
[Pulteney, William, Earl of Bath] (1727). A state of the national debt, London.Google Scholar
Pym, John (1641). The speech or declaration of John Pym, London.Google Scholar
Reasons for seeking a repeal of the Corporation and Test Acts (1790).Google Scholar
Remarks on Dr Price’s Observations (1776). London.Google Scholar
Remarks on the life of Mr Milton as published by J. T. (1699). London.Google Scholar
Resistance no rebellion (1775). London.Google Scholar
Revolution Society: At the anniversary meeting (1789). London.Google Scholar
Richardson, Andrew (1746). A free and an arbitrary government compared, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Richardson, Samuel (1985). Clarissa, or the history of a young lady, ed. Ross, Angus, London.Google Scholar
Richardson, Samuel (2001). Pamela, or Virtue rewarded, ed. Keymer, Thomas and Wakely, Alice, introd. Thomas Keymer, London.Google Scholar
Roger, James (1797). Essay on government, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sallust, (1608). The two most worthy and notable histories, trans. Thomas Heywood, London.Google Scholar
Sallust, (1931). ‘The war with Catiline’ in Sallust, trans. J. C. Rolfe, London, pp. 3129.Google Scholar
Salter, Edward (1791). Obedience to God the measure of human liberty, Winchester.Google Scholar
[Scott-Waring, John] (1791). A letter to the Right Hon. Edmund Burke, Dublin.Google Scholar
[Seller, Abednego] (1689). The history of passive obedience since the Reformation, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Serious and impartial observations on the blessings of liberty and peace (1776). London.Google Scholar
[Serle, Ambrose] (1775). Americans against liberty, London.Google Scholar
Sharp, Granville (1769). A representation of the injustice and dangerous tendency of tolerating slavery or of admitting the least claim of private property in the persons of men in England, London.Google Scholar
Shebbeare, John (1776). An essay on the origin, progress and establishment of national society, London.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Charles (1793). An essay upon the true principles of civil liberty and free government, London.Google Scholar
Sherlock, William (1691). The case of the allegiance due to sovereign powers, London.Google Scholar
[Sidney, Algernon] (1698). Discourses concerning government, London.Google Scholar
Sidney, Algernon (1990). Discourses concerning government, ed. West, Thomas G., Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S., 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, Samuel (1742). The mission and duty of civil governors and the deference due to them, London.Google Scholar
Smith, Sir Thomas (1982). De republica Anglorum, ed. Dewar, Mary, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smollett, Tobias (1995). Roderick Random, ed. Blewett, David, London.Google Scholar
Some considerations offered against the continuance of the Bank of England (1694). London.Google Scholar
Somerville, Thomas (1793). The effects of the French Revolution, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Southcomb, Lewis (1735). Subjection to the higher powers a necessary duty in every Christian, London.Google Scholar
[Spence, Thomas] (1795). The end of oppression, London.Google Scholar
[Squire, Samuel] (1746). A letter to a Tory friend, London.Google Scholar
Sterne, Laurence (2003). The life and opinions of Tristram Shandy, gentleman, ed. New, Melvyn and New, Joan, London.Google Scholar
Stevenson, William (1746). The true patriot’s wishes, London.Google Scholar
Stewart, James (1689). Salus populi suprema lex, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Strictures on a sermon entitled The principles of the revolution vindicated (1776). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan (2003). Gulliver’s travels, ed. Demaria, Robert, London.Google Scholar
Sykes, Arthur (1746). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
Tacitus, (1591). The end of Nero and beginning of Galba. Four books of the histories of Cornelius Tacitus: The life of Agricola, trans. Henry Savile, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tacitus, (1598). The annales of Cornelius Tacitus: The description of Germany, trans. Richard Grenewey, London.Google Scholar
Tacitus, (1931). The histories Books IV–V, trans. Clifford H. Moore and The annals Books I–III, trans. John Jackson, London.Google Scholar
The Declaration of his highness William Henry … Prince of Orange (1688). The Hague.Google Scholar
The duty of the king and subject on the principles of civil liberty (1776). London.Google Scholar
The effects of industry and idleness illustrated … Being an explanation of the moral of twelve celebrated prints lately published and designed by the ingenious Mr Hogarth (1748). London.Google Scholar
The female advocate, or a plea for the just liberty of the tender sex (1700). London.Google Scholar
The footman’s looking-glass (1747). London.Google Scholar
The freeman’s vade-mecum (1798). London.Google Scholar
The herald or patriotic proclaimer (1758). 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
The law-suit (1738). London.Google Scholar
The national debt as it stood at Michaelmas 1730 (1731). London.Google Scholar
The pamphlet entitled Taxation no tyranny candidly considered (1775). London.Google Scholar
The present state of the national debt (1740). London.Google Scholar
The price of the abdication (1693). London.Google Scholar
The state of the national debt as it stood Dec. 31 1742 and on Dec. 31 1743 (1744). London.Google Scholar
The true Briton’s catechism (1793). London.Google Scholar
The two systems of the social compact and the natural rights of man examined and refuted (1793). London.Google Scholar
Thomson, James (1736). Britain: Being the fourth part of Liberty, a poem, London.Google Scholar
Three dialogues concerning liberty (1776). London.Google Scholar
Tillotson, John (1689). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
[Toland, John] (1698a). The danger of mercenary Parliaments, London.Google Scholar
[Toland, John] (1698b). A complete collection of the historical, political and miscellaneous works of John Milton, 3 vols., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[Toland, John] (1699). The life of John Milton, London.Google Scholar
[Toland, John] (1700). The Oceana of James Harrington and his other works, London.Google Scholar
Toland, John (1701). Anglia libera, London.Google Scholar
Townshend, Thomas (1793). Considerations on the theoretical spirit of the times, Cork.Google Scholar
[Trelawny, Edward] (1746). An essay concerning slavery, London.Google Scholar
[Trenchard, John] (1698a). An argument showing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government and absolutely destructive to the constitution of the English monarchy, London.Google Scholar
[Trenchard, John] (1698b). Free thoughts concerning officers in the House of Commons, London.Google Scholar
Trenchard, John and Gordon, Thomas (1995). Cato’s Letters, ed. Hamowy, Ronald, 4 vols., Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Trott, Edmund (1746). A sermon on the present rebellion, London.Google Scholar
[Tucker, Abraham] (1763). Freewill, foreknowledge and fate, London.Google Scholar
Tucker, Josiah (1774). The true interest of Great Britain set forth in regard to the colonies in Four tracts, Gloucester, pp. 143216.Google Scholar
Tucker, Josiah (1781). A treatise concerning civil government, London.Google Scholar
Tucker, Josiah (1783). Four letters on important national subjects, Gloucester.Google Scholar
[Turnbull, Gordon ] (1786). An apology, London.Google Scholar
[Tyrrell, James] (1681). Patriarcha non monarcha, London.Google Scholar
[Tyrrell, James] (1694). Bibliotheca politica: Or an enquiry into the ancient constitution of the English government, London.Google Scholar
Usher, G. (1778). Republican letters, London.Google Scholar
Vaughan, William (1600). The golden grove, London.Google Scholar
Vindiciae contra tyrannos, a defence of liberty against tyrants (1648). London.Google Scholar
Warburton, William (1745). A sermon occasioned by the present unnatural rebellion, London.Google Scholar
Warburton, William (1746). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
Watkins, Charles (1796). Reflections on government, London.Google Scholar
Watson, George (1799). Thoughts on government, London.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard (1776). An essay on civil liberty, 3rd ed., Cambridge.Google Scholar
[Webster, William] (1740). The consequences of trade as to the wealth and strength of any nation, London.Google Scholar
Wemyss, James (1794). A scriptural view of kings and magistrates, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Wesley, John (1774). Thoughts upon slavery, 3rd ed., London.Google Scholar
Wesley, John (1775). A calm address to our American colonies, Bristol.Google Scholar
Wesley, John (1776). Some observations on liberty, London.Google Scholar
Weston, Charles (1793). The authority of government and duty of obedience, Durham.Google Scholar
[Whately, Thomas] (1765). The regulations lately made concerning the colonies, London.Google Scholar
Wiche, John (1745). Englishmen urged to loyalty by their sense and love of liberty, London.Google Scholar
Wilkes and liberty (1763). London.Google Scholar
Wilkes, John (1763). The following speech was made by John Wilkes, London.Google Scholar
Williamson, David (1792). Lectures on civil and religious liberty, London.Google Scholar
Willis, Robert (1795). Philosophical sketches of the principles of society and government, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, James (1774). Considerations on the nature and the extent of the legislative authority of the British Parliament, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Wilson, William (1689). A sermon [on] our deliverance from popery and arbitrary power, London.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary (1995). A vindication of the rights of men with A vindication of the rights of women and Hints, ed. Tomaselli, Sylvana, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woman not inferior to man (1740). London.Google Scholar
Wood, Thomas (1738). An institute of the laws of England, London.Google Scholar
Wood, Thomas (1796). Essay on civil government and subjection and obedience, Wigan.Google Scholar
Wynne, Edward (1768). Eunomus, or Dialogues concerning the law and constitution of England, 4 vols., London.Google Scholar
Yardley, Edward (1746). A sermon, London.Google Scholar
[Yonge, Sir William] (1731). Sedition and defamation displayed in a letter to the author of the Craftsman, London.Google Scholar
Young, John (1794). Essays … VI: Liberty and equality, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Anderson, Elizabeth (2017). Private government: How employers rule our lives (and Why we Don’t Talk about it), Princeton.Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford (2010). ‘“A dwelling beyond violence”: on the uses and disadvantages of history for contemporary republicans’, History of Political Thought 31, pp. 183220.Google Scholar
Arcenas, Claire Rydell (2022). America’s philosopher: John Locke in American intellectual life, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, Valentina (2012). Libertas and the practice of politics in the late Roman republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (ed.) (1997). Bolingbroke: Political writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2000). The ideological origins of the British Empire, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David (2002). ‘Empire and liberty: a republican dilemma’ in Republicanism: A shared European heritage, volume II: The values of republicanism in early modern Europe, ed. van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 2946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David (2004). ‘John Locke, Carolina, and the Two treatises of government’, Political Theory 32, pp. 602–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David (2007). The Declaration of Independence: A global history, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Samuel and Harris, John R. (2017). ‘What is arbitrary power?Journal of Political Power 10, pp. 5570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, Thomas (2022). ‘Democracy in Algernon Sidney’s Discourses concerning government’ in Republicanism and democracy: Close friends? ed. Krause, Skadi Siiri and Jörke, Dirk, Cham, pp. 81111.Google Scholar
Atkins, Jed W. (2018). ‘Non-domination and the libera res publica in Cicero’s republicanism’, History of European Ideas 44, pp. 756–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, Margaret (1978). ‘Toryism in the age of the American Revolution: John Lind and John Shebbeare’, Historical Studies 18, pp. 2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard (ed.) (1965). Pamphlets of the American Revolution 1750–1776, volume 1: 1750–1765, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard (1967). The ideological origins of the American Revolution, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. (1995). ‘Personal liberty under the common law of England 1200–1600’ in The origins of modern freedom in the West, ed. Davis, R. W., Stanford, pp. 178202.Google Scholar
Beasley, Jerry C. (1982). Novels of the 1740s, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald (1984). ‘Action, natality and citizenship: Hannah Arendt’s concept of freedom’ in Conceptions of liberty in political philosophy, ed. Pelczynski, Zbigniew and Gray, John, London, pp. 349–75.Google Scholar
Bejan, Teresa (2019). ‘“Since all the world is mad, why should not I be so?” Mary Astell on equality, hierarchy, and ambition’, Political Theory 47, pp. 781808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan (2014). ‘To act otherwise: agonistic republicanism and global citizenship’ in On global citizenship: James Tully in dialogue, London, pp. 181205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard (2007). Political constitutionalism: A republican defence of the constitutionality of democracy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benn, S. I. and Weinstein, W. L. (1971). ‘Being free to act, and being a free man’, Mind 80, pp. 194211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert and Mann, Anika (2005). ‘The contradictions of racism: Locke, slavery and the Two treatises’ in Race and racism in modern philosophy, ed. Valls, Andrew, Ithaca, pp. 89107.Google Scholar
Bonwick, Colin (1977). English radicals and the American Revolution, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Boralevi, Lea Campos (2002). ‘Classical foundational myths of European republicanism: the Jewish commonwealth’ in Republicanism: A shared European heritage, volume I: Republicanism and constitutionalism in early modern Europe, ed. van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 247–61.Google Scholar
Boulton, James T. (1963). The language of politics in the age of Wilkes and Burke, London.Google Scholar
Bourke, Richard (2015). Empire and revolution: The political life of Edmund Burke, Princeton.Google Scholar
Bourke, Richard (2016). ‘Popular sovereignty and political representation: Edmund Burke in the context of eighteenth-century thought’ in Popular sovereignty in historical perspective, ed. Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 212–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Laura (2016). ‘Wollstonecraft and the properties of (anti-) slavery, in The social and political philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan, Oxford, pp. 117–34.Google Scholar
Brand, Paul (2010). ‘The date and authorship of Bracton: a response’, Journal of Legal History 31, pp. 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Lomasky, Loren (2006). ‘Against reviving republicanism’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5, pp. 221–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, Annabel (1997). Liberty, right and nature: Individual rights in later scholastic thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel (2002). ‘Natural right and civil community: the civil philosophy of Hugo Grotius’, Historical Journal 45, pp. 3151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Holly (2021). ‘Creating a common law of slavery for England and its new world empire’, Law and History Review 39, pp. 765843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, John (1976). Party ideology and popular politics at the accession of George III, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, John (1980). ‘The Wilkites and the law, 1763–4’ in An ungovernable people: The English and their law in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, ed. Brewer, John and Styles, John, London, pp. 128–71.Google Scholar
Brewer, John (1989). The sinews of power: War, money and the English state 1688–1783, London.Google Scholar
Broad, Jacqueline (2014). ‘Women on liberty in early modern England’, Philosophy Compass 9, pp. 112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, Jacqueline (2015). ‘Sarah Chapone on liberty as non-domination’, The Monist, 98, pp. 7788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, Jacqueline (2017). ‘Marriage, slavery and the merger of wills: responses to Sprint, 1700–01’, in Women and liberty 1600–1800: Philosophical essays, ed. Broad, Jacqueline and Detlefsen, Karen, Oxford, pp. 6681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Reed (1982). Political and constitutional ideas of the court Whigs, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Buckle, Stephen and Castiglione, Dario (1991). ‘Hume’s critique of the contract theory’, History of Political Thought 12, pp. 457–80.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn (2004). ‘Regicide: the execution of Charles I and English political thought’ in Murder and monarchy: Regicide in European history 1300–1800, ed. von Friedeburg, Robert, Basingstoke, pp. 212–36.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. (1985). ‘Fortescue and the political theory of dominium’, The Historical Journal 28, pp. 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. H. (1993). ‘George Buchanan and the anti-monarchomachs’ in Political discourse in early modern Britain, ed. Phillipson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, J. W. (1988). Whigs and liberals: Continuity and change in English political thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Burtt, Shelley (1992). Virtue transformed: Political argument in England 1688–1740, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Jane (2008). Quaker constitutionalism and the political thought of John Dickinson, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canovan, Margaret (1978). ‘Two concepts of liberty: eighteenth century style’, Price-Priestley Newsletter 2, pp. 2743.Google Scholar
Carter, Ian (1999). A measure of freedom, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caudle, James (2012). ‘The defence of Georgian Britain: the anti-Jacobite sermon 1715–1746’ in The Oxford handbook of the British sermon, 1689–1901, ed. Francis, Keith and Gibson, William, Oxford, pp. 245–60.Google Scholar
Celikates, Robin (2013). ‘Freedom as non‐arbitrariness or as democratic self‐rule? A critique of contemporary republicanism’ in To be unfree: Republican perspectives on political unfreedom in history, literature and philosophy, ed. Dahl, Christian and Nexö, Tue Andersen, Bielefeld, pp. 3754.Google Scholar
Champion, Justin (2003). Republican learning: John Toland and the crisis of Christian culture 1696–1722, Manchester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, Justin (2005). ‘“Anglia libera”: commonwealth politics in the early years of George I’ in ‘Cultures of Whiggism’: New essays on English literature and culture in the long eighteenth century, ed. Womersley, David, Newark, pp. 86107.Google Scholar
Chater, Kathleen (2011). Untold histories: Black people in England and Wales during the period of the British slave trade c. 1660–1807, Manchester.Google Scholar
Christie, Ian R. (1998). ‘A vision of empire: Thomas Whately and The regulations lately made concerning the colonies’, English Historical Review 113, pp. 300–20.Google Scholar
Cicerchia, Lillian (2022). ‘Structural domination in the labor market’, European Journal of Political Theory 21, pp. 424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claeys, Gregory (2007). The French Revolution debate in Britain: The origins of modern politics, Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. (1985). English society, 1688–1832: Ideology, social structure and political practice during the ancien regime, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. (1994). The language of liberty, 1660–1832: Political discourse and social dynamics in the Anglo-American world, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. (2018). Thomas Paine: Britain, America and France in the age of Enlightenment and revolution, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. (2023). ‘“Lockeian liberalism” and “classical republicanism”: the formation, function and failure of the categories’, Intellectual History Review 33, pp. 1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Michelle T. (2014). ‘Doing violence to the Roman idea of liberty? Freedom as bodily integrity in Roman political thought’, History of Political Thought 35, pp. 211–33.Google Scholar
Cleary, Thomas R. (1984). Henry Fielding: Political writer, Waterloo, Ont.Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan (2013). ‘Mary Wollstonecraft, freedom and the enduring power of social domination’, European Journal of Political Theory 12, pp. 116–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, Alan (2014). ‘Freedom as independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the grand blessing of life’, Hypatia 29, pp. 908–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, Alan (2015). ‘Two spheres of domination: republican theory, social norms and the insufficiency of negative freedom’, Contemporary Political Theory 14, pp. 4562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, Alan (2017). ‘Catharine Macaulay’s republican conception of social and political liberty’, Political Studies 65, pp. 844–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, Linda (1982). In defiance of oligarchy: The Tory party 1714–1760, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Jeffrey (2009). ‘Quentin Skinner’s Hobbes and the neo-republican project’, Modern Intellectual History 6, pp. 343–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Patrick J. (2021). ‘Susanna Newcome and the origins of utilitarianism’, Utilitas 33, pp. 384–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cookson, J. E. (1982). The friends of peace: Anti-war liberalism in England 1793–1815, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, Rory (2020). The Grenvillites and the British press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crimmins, James (1986). ‘“The study of true politics”: John Brown on manners and liberty’, Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century 241, pp. 6586.Google Scholar
Cromartie, Alan (2016). ‘Parliamentary sovereignty, popular sovereignty, and Henry Parker’s adjudicative standpoint’ in Popular sovereignty in historical perspective, ed. Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 142–63.Google Scholar
Cruickshanks, Eveline and Erskine-Hill, Howard (2004). The Atterbury Plot, Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Jenny (2004). Hypocrisy and the politics of politeness: Manners and morals from Locke to Austen, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Michael T. (2016). ‘The vilification of Thomas Paine: constructing a folk devil in the 1790s’ in Liberty, property and popular politics: England and Scotland, 1688–1815: Essays in honour of H. T. Dickinson, ed. Davis, Michael T. and Pentland, Gordon, Edinburgh, pp. 176–93.Google Scholar
Dawson, Hannah (2013). ‘Natural religion: Pufendorf and Locke on the edge of freedom and reason’ in Freedom and the construction of Europe, volume I: Religious and constitutional liberties, ed. Skinner, Quentin and van Gelderen, Martin, Cambridge, pp. 115–33.Google Scholar
Dawson, Hannah (2022). ‘Liberty before licence in Locke’ in Rethinking Liberty before liberalism, ed. Dawson, Hannah and De Dijn, Annelien, Cambridge, pp. 6076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Hannah (2023). ‘When reason does not see you: feminism at the intersection of history and philosophy’ in History in the humanities and social sciences, ed. Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 229–59.Google Scholar
De Dijn, Annelien (2020). Freedom: An unruly history, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dewar, Mary (ed.) (1982). De republica anglorum by Sir Thomas Smith, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dickinson, H. T. (1977). Liberty and property: Political ideology in eighteenth-century Britain, London.Google Scholar
Dickson, P. G. M. (1967). The financial revolution in England: A study in the development of public credit 1688–1756, London.Google Scholar
Douglass, Robin (2023). Mandeville’s fable: Pride, hypocrisy and sociability, Princeton.Google Scholar
Draper, Theodore (1996). A struggle for power: The American Revolution, New York.Google Scholar
Dunn, John (1969). The political thought of John Locke: An historical account of the argument of the ‘Two treatises of government’, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John (1980). Political obligation in its historical context: Essays in political theory, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzelzainis, Martin (ed.) (1991). John Milton: Political writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dzelzainis, Martin (1995). ‘Milton’s classical republicanism’ in Milton and republicanism, ed. Armitage, David, Himy, Armand and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzelzainis, Martin (2014). ‘Harrington and the oligarchs: Milton, Vane and Stubbe’ in Perspectives on English revolutionary republicanism, ed. Mahlberg, Gaby and Wiemann, Dick, Farnham, pp. 1533.Google Scholar
Dzelzainis, Martin (2019). ‘“The vulgar only scap’d who stood without”: Milton and the politics of exclusion’ in Democracy and anti-democracy in early modern England 1603–1689, ed. Cuttica, Cesare and Peltonen, Markku, Leiden, pp. 239–59.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Dan (2019). On the spirit of rights, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, John (1999). Civil society: The critical history of an idea, New York.Google Scholar
Elazar, Yiftah (2015). ‘Liberty as a caricature: Bentham’s antidote to republicanism’, Journal of the History of Ideas 76, pp. 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Yiftah (2022a). ‘The downfall of all slavish hierarchies: Richard Price on emancipation, improvement and republican Utopia’, Modern Intellectual History 19, pp. 81104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Yiftah (2022b). ‘Adam Smith and the idea of free government’, Intellectual History Review 32, pp. 691707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, James (1986). ‘“So vile and miserable an estate”: the problem of slavery in Locke’s political thought’, Political Theory 14, pp. 263–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, James (2008). ‘Locke, natural law, and new world slavery’, Political Theory 36, pp. 495522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Moira (ed.) (1985). First feminists: British women writers 1578–1799, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Fink, Z. S. (1962). The classical republicans, 2nd ed., Evanston.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Martin (1991). ‘Richard Price and the London Revolution Society’, Enlightenment and Dissent 10, pp. 3550.Google Scholar
Fontana, Benedetto (2009). ‘Ancient Roman historians and early modern political theory’ in The Cambridge companion to the Roman historians, ed. Feldherr, Andrew, Cambridge, pp. 362–79.Google Scholar
Foord, Archibald S. (1964). His Majesty’s opposition 1714–1830, Oxford.Google Scholar
Forbes, Duncan (1975). Hume’s philosophical politics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Forbes, Duncan (1976). ‘Sceptical whiggism, commerce and liberty’ in Essays on Adam Smith, ed. Skinner, Andrew and Wilson, Thomas, Oxford, pp. 179201.Google Scholar
Foxley, Rachel (2013). ‘“Due libertie and proportioned equalitie”: Milton, democracy and the republican tradition’, History of Political Thought 34, pp. 614–38.Google Scholar
Foxley, Rachel (2022). ‘Liberty and hierarchy in Milton’s revolutionary prose’ in Rethinking Liberty before liberalism, ed. Dawson, Hannah and De Dijn, Annelien, Cambridge, pp. 7999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxley, Rachel (2023). ‘The possibility of democratic republicanism: the Levellers, Milton and Harrington’ in Republicanism and democracy: Close friends? ed. Krause, Skadi Siiri and Jörke, Dirk, Cham, pp. 5779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Samuel (ed.) (1906). The constitutional documents of the Puritan revolution 1625–1660, Oxford.Google Scholar
Garnett, George (ed). (1994). Vindiciae contra tyrannos, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gerrard, Christine (1994). The patriot opposition to Walpole: Politics, poetry and national myth 1725–1742, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuna, Marco (2002). ‘Republicanism and commercial society in the Scottish Enlightenment: the case of Adam Ferguson’ in Republicanism: A shared European heritage, volume II: The values of republicanism in early modern Europe, ed. van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 177–95.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Eric (2008). ‘From republican to liberal liberty’, History of Political Thought 29, pp. 132–67.Google Scholar
Gilmartin, Kevin (2007). Writing against revolution: Literary conservatism in Britain 1790–1832, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, Jane (2018). Handel in London: The making of a genius, London.Google Scholar
Goldgar, Bertrand A. (1976). Walpole and the wits: The relation of politics to literature 1722–1742, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark (1980a). ‘The revolution of 1689 and the structure of political argument’, Bulletin of Research in the Humanities 83, pp. 473564.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark (1980b). ‘The roots of true Whiggism 1688–94’, History of Political Thought 1, pp. 195236.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark (1993). ‘Priestcraft and the birth of Whiggism’ in Political discourse in early modern Britain, ed. Phillipson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 209–31.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark (2006). ‘The English system of liberty’ in The Cambridge history of eighteenth-century political thought, ed. Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert, Cambridge, pp. 4078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, Mark (2007). ‘Mary Astell and John Locke’ in Mary Astell: Reason, gender, faith, ed. Michelson, Michal, London, pp. 6586.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark and Jackson, Clare (2007). ‘Williamite tyranny and the Whig Jacobites’ in Redefining William III, ed. Mijers, Esther and Onnekink, David, Aldershot, pp. 177–99.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Maurice (2000). ‘Republican liberty considered’, History of Political Thought 21, pp. 543–59.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert (2003). ‘Folie républicaine’, Annual Review of Political Science 6, pp. 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex (2015). From slavery to the co-operative commonwealth: Labor and republican liberty in the nineteenth century, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Green, Karen (2012). ‘Liberty and virtue in Catharine Macaulay’s Enlightenment philosophy’, Intellectual History Review 22, pp. 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Karen (2017). ‘Locke, Enlightenment and liberty in the works of Catharine Macaulay and her contemporaries’ in Women and liberty, 1600–1800: Philosophical essays, ed. Broad, Jacqueline and Detlefsen, Karen, Oxford, pp. 187–96.Google Scholar
Green, Karen (2018). ‘Catharine Macaulay’s Enlightenment faith and radical politics’, History of European Ideas 44, pp. 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Jack P. (2010). The constitutional origins of the American Revolution, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (1996). Natural law and moral philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (2007). ‘Republicanism’ in A Companion to contemporary political philosophy, 2nd ed., ed. Goodin, Robert E., Pettit, Philip and Pogge, Thomas, 2 vols., Oxford, vol. 2, pp. 729–35.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud and Seidler, Michael J. (2016). ‘Natural law: law, rights and duties’ in A Companion to intellectual history, ed. Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian, Oxford, pp. 377401.Google Scholar
Haig, Robert Louis (1960). The Gazetteer, 1735–1797: A study in the eighteenth-century English newspaper, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena (2002). ‘Locke and the non-arbitrary’, European Journal of Political Theory 2, pp. 261–79.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena (2010). ‘Building blocks of a republican cosmopolitanism: the modality of being free’, European Journal of Political Theory 9, pp. 3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldenius, Lena (2014). ‘Freedom fit for a feminist? On the feminist potential of Quentin Skinner’s conception of republican freedom’, Redescriptions 17, pp. 86103.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena (2015). Mary Wollstonecraft and feminist republicanism: Independence, rights and the experience of unfreedom, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldenius, Lena (2017). ‘Mary Wollstonecraft and freedom as independence’ in Women and liberty, 1600–1800: Philosophical essays, ed. Broad, Jacqueline and Detlefsen, Karen, Oxford, pp. 95108.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena (2022). ‘Neo-roman liberty in the philosophy of human rights’ in Rethinking Liberty before liberalism, ed. Dawson, Hannah and De Dijn, Annelien, Cambridge, pp. 215–32.Google Scholar
Hamel, Christopher (2011). L’esprit républicain: Droits naturels et vertu civique chez Algernon Sidney, Paris.Google Scholar
Hamel, Christopher (2013). ‘The republicanism of John Milton: natural rights, civic virtue and the dignity of man’, History of Political Thought 34, pp. 3563.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Rachel (2013). ‘Rethinking the political thought of James Harrington: royalism, republicanism and democracy’, History of European Ideas 39, pp. 354–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, Rachel (2019). James Harrington: An intellectual biography, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, Rachel (2020). Republicanism: An introduction, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hamowy, Ronald (1990). ‘Cato’s Letters, John Locke and the republican paradigm’, History of Political Thought 11, pp. 273–94.Google Scholar
Hankins, James (2023). Political meritocracy in Renaissance Italy: The virtuous republic of Francesco Patrizi of Siena, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harpham, Edward J. (2000). ‘The problem of liberty in the thought of Adam Smith’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22, pp. 217–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Michael (1987). London newspapers in the age of Walpole, Toronto.Google Scholar
Harris, Tim (2006). Revolution: The great crisis of the British monarchy, 1685–1720, London.Google Scholar
Herzog, Lisa (2013). Inventing the market: Smith, Hegel, and political theory, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Barnor (2014). ‘Western hegemony, black fugitivity’, Political Theory 42, pp. 288313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Ian (2005). ‘Remarks on Cato’s Letters’ in ‘Cultures of Whiggism’: New essays on English literature and culture in the long eighteenth century, ed. Womersley, David, Newark, pp. 127–46.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. (2003). The subject of liberty: Towards a feminist theory of freedom, Princeton.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Regier, Emily F. (2019). ‘Mary Wollstonecraft, social constructivism and the idea of freedom’, Politics and Gender 15, pp. 645–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoak, Dale (2007). ‘Sir William Cecil, Sir Thomas Smith and the monarchical republic of Tudor England’ in The monarchical republic of early modern England: Essays in response to Patrick Collinson, ed. McDiarmid, John F., Aldershot, pp. 3754.Google Scholar
Holland, Ben (2017). The moral person of the state: Pufendorf, sovereignty and composite politics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honohan, Iseult (2002). Civic republicanism, London.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan (2005). Jealousy of trade: International competition and the nation-state in historical perspective, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Horne, Thomas (1980). ‘Politics in a corrupt society: William Arnall’s defense of Robert Walpole’, Journal of the History of Ideas 41, pp. 601–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoye, J. Matthew and Monaghan, Jeffrey (2018). ‘Surveillance, freedom and the republic’, European Journal of Political Theory 17, pp. 343–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian (2001). Rival Enlightenments: Civil and metaphysical philosophy in early modern Germany, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian (2023). ‘Human nature, the state of nature and natural law’ in The Cambridge companion to Pufendorf, ed. Haakonssen, Knud and Hunter, Ian, Cambridge, pp. 109–39.Google Scholar
Ivison, Duncan (1997). The self at liberty: Political argument and the arts of government, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret (1981). The radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, freemasons and republicans, London.Google Scholar
James, Susan (1997). Passion and action: The emotions in seventeenth-century philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar
James, Susan (2016). ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’s conception of rights’ in The social and political philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Bergès, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan, Oxford, pp. 148–65.Google Scholar
Jensen, Freyja (2012). Reading the Roman Republic in early-modern Britain, Leiden.Google Scholar
Johnston, Kenneth R. (2013). Unusual suspects: Pitt’s reign of alarm and the lost generation of the 1790s, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Howard (1998). Master Tully: Cicero in Tudor England, Nieuwkoop.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas and Katznelson, Ira (2008). Liberal beginnings: Making a republic for the moderns, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapust, Daniel J. (2004). ‘Skinner, Pettit and Livy: the conflict of the orders and the ambiguity of republican liberty’, History of Political Thought 25, pp. 377401.Google Scholar
Kapust, Daniel J. (2011). Republicanism, rhetoric, and Roman political thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapust, Daniel J. and Turner, Brandon P. (2013). ‘Democratical gentlemen and the lust for mastery: status, ambition, and the language of liberty in Hobbes’s political thought’, Political Theory 41, pp. 648–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelleher, Richard (2022). ‘Paper revolutions’ in Defaced! Money, conflict, protest, ed. Kelleher, Richard, Cambridge, pp. 1625.Google Scholar
Kelly, Duncan (2011). The propriety of liberty: Persons, passions and judgement in modern political thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. J. (2001). ‘Classical utilitarianism and the concept of freedom: a response to the republican critique’, Journal of Political Ideologies 6, pp. 1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Geoff (2013). ‘Freemen, free labor and republican discourse in early modern England’, Contributions to the History of Concepts 8, pp. 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Geoff (2014). ‘Cicero, Roman republicanism and the contested meaning of libertas’, Political Studies 62, pp. 488501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, J. P. (ed.) (1966). The Stuart constitution 1603–1688: Documents and commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kenyon, J. P. (1977). Revolution principles, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymer, Thomas and Wakely, Alice (eds.) (2005). Henry Fielding: The history of Tom Jones, a foundling, London.Google Scholar
Koekkoek, René (2022). ‘Liberty, death and slavery in the age of Atlantic revolutions, 1770s to 1790s’ in Rethinking Liberty before liberalism, ed. Dawson, Hannah and De Dijn, Annelien, Cambridge, pp. 134–53.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H. (2003). The quality of freedom, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H. (2008). ‘Liberty and domination’ in Republicanism and political theory, ed. Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John, Oxford, pp. 3157.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Bruce (ed.) (2000). Thomas Paine: Political writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile (2010). ‘Republicanism and global justice: a sketch’, European Journal of Political Theory 9, pp. 4869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John (eds.) (2008). Republicanism and political theory, London.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile and Ronzoni, Miriam (2016). ‘What is a free state? Republican internationalism and globalisation’, Political Studies 64, pp. 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles (2001). ‘A critique of Philip Pettit’s republicanism’, Philosophical Issues 11, pp. 229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, Peter (ed.) (1988). John Locke: Two treatises of government, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel (2016). Popular sovereignty in early modern constitutional thought, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leipold, Bruno (2020). ‘Marx’s social republic: radical republicanism and the political institutions of socialism’ in Radical republicanism: Recovering the tradition’s popular heritage, ed. Leipold, Bruno, Nabulsi, Karma and White, Stuart, Oxford, pp. 172–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leipold, Bruno (2022). ‘Chains and invisible threads: liberty and domination in Marx’s account of wage-slavery’ in Rethinking Liberty before liberalism, ed. Dawson, Hannah and De Dijn, Annelien, Cambridge, pp. 194214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, David (1989). The province of legislation determined: Legal theory in eighteenth-century Britain, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, Christian, and Valentini, Laura (2016). ‘Freedom as independence’, Ethics 126, pp. 1043–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobban, Michael (2007). A history of the philosophy of law in the common law world, 1600–1900, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Lockwood, Shelley (ed.) (1997). Sir John Fortescue: On the laws and governance of England, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, Douglas (1977). Bentham on liberty: Jeremy Bentham’s idea of liberty in relation to his utilitarianism, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank (2005). ‘Milton’s case for a free commonwealth’, American Journal of Political Science 49, pp. 466–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank (2010). A general theory of domination and justice, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank (2012). ‘What counts as arbitrary power?Journal of Political Power 5, pp. 137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank (2018). ‘Non-domination’ in The Oxford handbook of freedom, ed. Schmidtz, David and Pavel, Carmen E., Oxford, pp. 106–23.Google Scholar
Lovett, Frank (2022). The well-ordered republic, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGilvray, Eric (2011). The invention of market freedom, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, Graham (2002). ‘The limits of neo-Roman liberty’, History of Political Thought 23, pp. 418–31.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel (2017). Human rights and political wrongs: A new approach to human rights law, London.Google Scholar
Marston, Daniel (2001). The Seven Years’ War, New York.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, F. O. (1931). Translation, an Elizabethan art, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynor, John (2003). Republicanism in the modern world, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McBride, Cillian (2015). ‘Freedom as non-domination: radicalisation or retreat?Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18, pp. 349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConville, Brendan (2007). The king’s three bodies: The rise and fall of royal America 1688–1776, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. (2003). ‘Machiavelli against republicanism: on the Cambridge school’s “Guicciardinian moments”’, Political Theory 31, pp. 615–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrea, Brian (1981). Henry Fielding and the politics of mid-eighteenth century England, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
Mendle, Michael (1995). Henry Parker and the English civil war: The political thought of the public’s ‘privado’, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Peter N. (ed.) (1993). Joseph Priestley: Political writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter N. (1994). Defining the common good: Empire, religion and philosophy in eighteenth-century Britain, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moen, Lars (2022). ‘Eliminating terms of confusion: resolving the liberal–republican dispute’, Journal of Ethics 26, pp. 247–71.Google Scholar
Monod, Paul (2005). ‘Tom Jones and the crisis of Whiggism in mid-Hanoverian England’ in ‘Cultures of Whiggism’: New essays on English literature and culture in the long eighteenth century, ed. Womersley, David, Newark, pp. 268–96.Google Scholar
Moore, Lucy (2000). Amphibious thing: The life of Lord Hervey, London.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel (2015). Christian human rights, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2016). ‘Hobbes (and Austin and Aquinas) on law as command of the sovereign’ in The Oxford handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch, Oxford, pp. 339–58.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric (2004). The Greek tradition in republican thought, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric (2011). The Hebrew republic: Jewish sources and the transformation of European political thought, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric (2014). The royalist revolution: Monarchy and the American founding, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Norbrook, David (1999). Writing the English republic: Poetry, rhetoric and politics, 1627–1660, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Norton, Mary Beth (2020). 1774: The long year of revolution, New York.Google Scholar
Nyquist, Mary (2013). Arbitrary rule: Slavery, tyranny, and the power of life and death, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Karen (2009). Women and Enlightenment in eighteenth-century Britain, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Flaherty, Niall (2019). Utilitarianism in the age of Enlightenment: The moral and political thought of William Paley, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Olusoga, David (2021). Black and British: A forgotten history, London.Google Scholar
Oz-Salzberger, Fania (2002). ‘Scots, Germans, republic and commerce’ in Republicanism: A shared European heritage, volume II: The values of republicanism in early modern Europe, ed. van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 197226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Anthony (2011). ‘“A species of slavery”: Richard Price’s rational dissent and antislavery’, Slavery and Abolition 32, pp. 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (1990). Samuel Pufendorf discepolo di Hobbes. Per una reinterpretazione del giusnaturalismo moderno, Bologna.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (2008). ‘Pufendorf disciple of Hobbes: the nature of man and the doctrine of socialitas’, History of European Ideas 34, pp. 2660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, Jon (2007). Taming the Leviathan: The reception of the political and religious ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England 1640–1700, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1988). The sexual contract, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole (2002). ‘Self-ownership and property in the person: democratisation and a tale of two concepts’, Journal of Political Philosophy 10, pp. 2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Alan (1996). ‘The republican critique of liberalism’, British Journal of Political Science 26, pp. 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, Ronald (1967). Satire and the novel in eighteenth-century England, New Haven.Google Scholar
Peltonen, Markku (1995). Classical humanism and republicanism in English political thought, 1570–1640, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltonen, Markku (2023). The political thought of the English free state, 1649–1653, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2001). A theory of freedom: From the psychology to the politics of agency, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2002). ‘Keeping republican freedom simple: on a difference with Quentin Skinner’, Political Theory 30, pp. 339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2007). ‘Free persons and free choices’, History of Political Thought 28, pp. 709–18.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2008). ‘Republican freedom: three axioms, four theorems’ in Republicanism and political theory, ed. Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John, Oxford, pp. 102–30.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2010). ‘A republican law of peoples’, European Journal of Political Theory 9, pp. 7094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2012). On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2014). Just freedom: A moral compass for a complex world, New York.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2015). ‘The republican law of peoples: a restatement’ in Domination and global political justice: Conceptual, historical and institutional perspectives, ed. Buckinx, Barbara, Trejo-Mathys, Jonathan and Waligore, Timothy, London, pp. 3770.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2023). The state, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philp, Mark (1985). ‘Rational religion and political radicalism in the 1790s’, Enlightenment and Dissent 4, pp. 3546.Google Scholar
Philp, Mark (1998). ‘English republicanism in the 1790s’, Journal of Political Philosophy 6, pp. 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumb, J. H. (1967). The growth of political stability in England 1675–1725, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1971). Politics, language and time: Essays on political thought and history, New York.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian moment, Princeton.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1977). ‘Historical introduction’ in The political works of James Harrington, Cambridge, pp. 1152.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1985). Virtue, commerce and history, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1987). The ancient constitution and the feudal law: A reissue with a retrospect, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1994). ‘England’s Cato: the virtues and fortunes of Algernon Sidney, The Historical Journal 37, pp. 915–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (2006). ‘Present at the Creation: with Laslett to the lost worlds’, International Journal of Public Affairs 2, pp. 717.Google Scholar
Podoksik, Efraim (2010). ‘One concept of liberty: towards writing the history of a political concept’, Journal of the History of Ideas 71, pp. 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Henry (2015). Epic into novel, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahe, Paul (1994). Republics ancient and modern: Classical republicanism and the American Revolution, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Reid, John Philip (1988). The concept of liberty in the age of the American Revolution, Chicago.Google Scholar
Riding, Jacqueline (2017). Jacobites: A new history of the ’45 rebellion, London.Google Scholar
Robbins, Caroline (1959). The eighteenth-century commonwealthman, Indianapolis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John (ed.) (1997). Andrew Fletcher: Political works, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Robertson, Ritchie (2020). The Enlightenment: The pursuit of happiness 1680–1790, London.Google Scholar
Rosen, Frederick (2003). Classical utilitarianism from Hume to Mill, London.Google Scholar
Røstvig, Maren-Sophia (1954–8). The happy man: Metamorphoses of a classical ideal, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Rumble, Wilfred E. (ed.) (1995). John Austin: The province of jurisprudence determined, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Runciman, David (2003). ‘The concept of the state: the sovereignty of a fiction’ in States and citizens: History, theory, prospects, ed. Skinner, Quentin and Stråth, Bo, Cambridge, pp. 2838.Google Scholar
Sabbadini, Lorenzo (2016). ‘Popular sovereignty and representation in the English civil war’ in Popular sovereignty in historical perspective, ed. Bourke, Richard and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 164–86.Google Scholar
Sabbadini, Lorenzo (2020). Property, liberty, and self-ownership in seventeenth-century England, London.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, John A. (1987). Disaffected patriots: London supporters of revolutionary America 1769–1782, Kingston, Ont.Google Scholar
Sakkas, Evangelos (2016). ‘Richard Price and his critics: Liberty, representation, and political obligation in England c.1760–1789’. PhD thesis, Queen Mary University of London.Google Scholar
Scanlan, Padraic X. (2020). Slave empire: How slavery built modern Britain, London.Google Scholar
Schwoerer, Lois G. (2019). ‘No standing armies!’ The antimilitary ideology in seventeenth-century England, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Scott, Jonathan (2004). Commonwealth principles: Republican writing of the English revolution, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, M. N. S. (1994). American republicanism: Roman ideology in the United States constitution, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, M. N. S (1998). The sacred fire of liberty: Republicanism, liberalism and the law, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, Torrey (2019). ‘The rhetoric of self-ownership’, Political Theory 47, pp. 311–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, George (1968). Dean Tucker and eighteenth-century economic and political thought, New York.Google Scholar
Shuttleton, David (2003). ‘Mary Chandler’s description of Bath: a tradeswoman poet of the Georgian urban Renaissance’ in Women and urban life in eighteenth-century England: On the town, ed. Sweet, Rosemary and Lane, Penelope, London, pp. 173–94.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1978). The foundations of modern political thought, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1990). ‘The republican ideal of political liberty’ in Machiavelli and republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin and Viroli, Maurizio, Cambridge, pp. 293309.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1998). Liberty before liberalism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002a). ‘John Milton and the politics of slavery’ in Visions of politics, volume II: Renaissance virtues, Cambridge, pp. 286307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002b). ‘Classical liberty, Renaissance translation and the English civil war’ in Visions of politics, volume II: Renaissance virtues, Cambridge, pp. 308–43.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002c). ‘Augustan party politics and Renaissance constitutional thought’ in Visions of politics, volume II: Renaissance virtues, Cambridge, pp. 344–67.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002d). ‘A third concept of liberty’, Proceedings of the British Academy 117, pp. 237–68.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2008a). ‘Freedom as the absence of arbitrary power’ in Republicanism and political theory, ed. Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John, Oxford, pp. 83101.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2008b). Hobbes and republican liberty, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2009a). ‘On trusting the judgement of our rulers’ in Political judgement: Essays for John Dunn, ed. Bourke, Richard and Geuss, Raymond, Cambridge, pp. 113130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2009b). ‘A genealogy of the modern state’, Proceedings of the British Academy 162, pp. 325–70.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2012). ‘On the liberty of the ancients and the moderns: a reply to my critics’, Journal of the History of Ideas 73, pp. 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2016). Thinking about liberty: An historian’s approach (The annual Balzan lecture), Florence.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2018). From humanism to Hobbes: Studies in rhetoric and politics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2019). Machiavelli: A very short introduction, 2nd ed., Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2022). ‘On neo-Roman liberty: a response and reassessment’ in Rethinking Liberty before liberalism, ed. Dawson, Hannah and De Dijn, Annelien, Cambridge, pp. 233–66.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2024). ‘Neo-Roman liberty: a genealogy’ in The Oxford handbook of republicanism, ed. Lovett, Frank and Sellers, Mortimer (online ed., Oxford Academic, 23 January 2024), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197754115.013.10.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin and van Gelderen, Martin (eds.) (2013). Freedom and the construction of Europe, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skjönsberg, Max (2016). ‘Lord Bolingbroke’s theory of party and opposition’, The Historical Journal 59, pp. 947–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjönsberg, Max (2019). ‘Adam Ferguson on partisanship, party conflict, and popular participation’, Modern Intellectual History 16, pp. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjönsberg, Max (2021). The persistence of party: Ideas of harmonious discord in eighteenth-century Britain, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjönsberg, Max (2022). ‘Charles Francis Sheridan on the feudal origins and political science of the 1772 revolution in Sweden’, Journal of the History of Ideas 83, pp. 407–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjönsberg, Max (ed.) (2023). Catharine Macaulay: Political writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smallwood, Angela (1989). Fielding and the woman question: Fielding and feminist debate 1700–1750, Brighton.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Margaret R. (1995). Sex and subjection: Attitudes to women in early-modern society, London.Google Scholar
Somos, Mark (2019). American states of nature: The origins of independence 1761–1775, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowaal, Alice (2017). ‘Mary Astell on liberty’ in Women and liberty, 1600–1800: Philosophical essays, ed. Broad, Jacqueline and Detlefsen, Karen, Oxford, pp. 178–94.Google Scholar
Spector, Horacio (2010). ‘Four conceptions of freedom’, Political Theory 38, pp. 780808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springborg, Patricia (1995). ‘Mary Astell (1666–1731), critic of Locke’, American Political Science Review 89, pp. 621–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springborg, Patricia (ed.) (1996). Astell: Political writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spitz, Jean-Fabien (1995). La liberté politique: essai de généalogie conceptuelle, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Peter (1999). Roman law in European history, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin (2016). Crisis and constitutionalism: Roman political thought from the fall of the republic to the age of revolution, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. (2014). ‘Impunity and domination: a puzzle for republicanism’, European Journal of Political Theory 13, pp. 121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Targett, Simon (1994). ‘Government and ideology during the age of Whig supremacy: the political arguments of Sir Robert Walpole’s newspaper propagandists’, The Historical Journal 37, pp. 289317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavor, Eve (1987). Scepticism, society and the eighteenth-century novel, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1991). ‘What’s wrong with negative liberty’ in Liberty, ed. Miller, David, Oxford, pp. 141–62.Google Scholar
Taylor, Michael (2020). The interest: How the British establishment resisted the abolition of slavery, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, Robert S. (2017). Exit left: Markets and mobility in republican thought, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. O. (1977). The honest mind: The thought and work of Richard Price, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. O. (ed.) (1991). Richard Price: Political writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, Peter D. G. (1987). The Townshend duties crisis: The second phase of the American Revolution 1767–1773, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thomas, Peter D. G. (1991). Tea Party to independence: The third phase of the American Revolution 1773–1776, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Michael J. (2018). ‘The two faces of domination in republican political theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 17, pp. 4464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, Brian (2014). Liberty and law: The idea of permissive natural law, 1100–1800, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, Sylvana (ed.) (1995). Mary Wollstonecraft: A vindication of the rights of men with A vindication of the rights of women and Hints, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1979). Natural rights theories: Their origin and development, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1993). Philosophy and government, 1572–1651, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James (1980). A discourse on property: John Locke and his adversaries, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James (ed.) (1991). Samuel Pufendorf: On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tully, James (1993a). An approach to political philosophy: Locke in contexts, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James (1993b). ‘Placing the Two treatises’ in Political discourse in early modern Britain, ed. Phillipson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 253–80.Google Scholar
Tully, James (2005). ‘Exclusion and assimilation: two forms of domination in relation to freedom’, Nomos 46, pp. 191229.Google Scholar
Tully, James (2008). ‘The agonistic freedom of citizens’ in Public philosophy in a new key, volume I: Democracy and civic freedom, Cambridge, pp. 135–59.Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio (2002). Republicanism, trans. A. Shugaar. New York.Google Scholar
Walker, William (2006). ‘Sallust and Skinner on civil liberty’, European Journal of Political Theory 5, pp. 237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Lee (2004). The Politics of liberty in England and revolutionary America, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, David J. (2016). ‘Slavery and freedom in theory and practice’, Political Theory 44, pp. 846–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Ian (1957). The rise of the novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding, London.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard (2016). ‘Quentin Skinner and the relevance of intellectual history’ in A companion to intellectual history, ed. Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian, Oxford, pp. 97112.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard (2023). The end of Enlightenment, London.Google Scholar
Wicksteed, Charles (1849). Lectures on the memory of the just, London.Google Scholar
Williams, E. Neville (ed.) (1960). The eighteenth-century constitution 1688–1815: Documents and commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilson, Kathleen (1998). The sense of the people: Politics, culture and imperialism in England 1715–1785, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald (2002). ‘Commercial realities, republican principles’ in Republicanism: A shared European heritage, volume II: The values of republicanism in early modern Europe, ed. van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 293310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Donald (ed.) (2006). Vindiciae Gallicae and other writings on the French Revolution, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1950). Libertas as a political idea at Rome during the late republic and early principate, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womersley, David (2019). ‘Introduction’ in Brown, John, An estimate of the manners and principles of the times and other writings, ed. Womersley, David, Carmel, IN, pp. ixxxvi.Google Scholar
Wootton, David (1994). ‘Introduction: the republican tradition from commonwealth to common sense’ in Republicanism, liberty and commercial society 1649–1776, ed. Wootton, David, Stanford, pp. 141.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair (1994). ‘Marchamont Nedham and the beginnings of English republicanism 1649–1656’ in Republicanism, liberty and commercial society 1649–1776, ed. Wootton, David, Stanford, pp. 4581.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair (1995). ‘Milton and Marchamont Nedham’ in Milton and republicanism, ed. Armitage, David, Himy, Armand and Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, pp. 156–80.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair (2007). Literature and politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell, Marchamont Nedham, Oxford.Google Scholar
Zeng, Elena Yi-Jia (2022). ‘Empire and liberty in Adam Ferguson’s republicanism’, History of European Ideas 48, pp. 909–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zook, Melinda S. (1999). Radical Whigs and conspiratorial politics in late Stuart England, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Zwolinski, Matt (2018). ‘Exploitation and freedom’ in The Oxford handbook of freedom, ed. Schmidtz, David and Pavel, Carmen E., Oxford, pp. 421–38.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Quentin Skinner, Queen Mary, University of London
  • Book: Liberty as Independence
  • Online publication: 23 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139226677.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Quentin Skinner, Queen Mary, University of London
  • Book: Liberty as Independence
  • Online publication: 23 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139226677.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Quentin Skinner, Queen Mary, University of London
  • Book: Liberty as Independence
  • Online publication: 23 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139226677.013
Available formats
×