Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:02:18.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Daphna Hacker
Daphna Hacker
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization , pp. 323 - 360
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboderin, Isabella, 2004. “Modernisation and Ageing Theory Revisited: Current Explanations of Recent Developing World and Historical Western Shifts in Material Family Support for Older People,” Ageing & Society, 24(1): 29–50.Google Scholar
Abrams, Kerry, 2013. “What Makes the Family Special?” The University of Chicago Law Review, 80(1): 7–27. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Abrams, Kerry and Kent, Piacenti R., 2014. “Immigration’s Family Values,” Virginia Law Review, 100(4): 629–709.Google Scholar
Abrego, Leisy J., 2014. Sacrificing Families: Navigating Laws, Labor, and Love across Borders (Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Adar Bunis, Mattat, 2007. Families in Sociological and Anthropological Perspective (Raanana: The Open University of Israel). [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Adelman, Carol C., 2003. “The Privatization of Foreign Aid: Reassessing National Largesse,” Foreign Affairs, 82(6): 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, Nehaluddin, 2011. “Child Labour: Ground Realities of Indian Labor Laws,” Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 37(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, Rajnaara, 2010. “British Muslims and the Revolution of the Practice of Islamic Law with Particular Reference to Dispute Resolution,” Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law, 6(1): 27–39.Google Scholar
Alanen, Julia, 2008. “When Human Rights Conflict: Mediating International Parental Kidnapping Disputes Involving the Domestic Violence Defense,” Inter-American Law Review, 40(1): 49–108.Google Scholar
Albin, Einat, 2016. “From Required and Unlimited Intimacy to Troubling Unfree Labor: The Case of Domestic Workers,” Tel-Aviv University Law Review, 39(2): 369–414. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Aldeeb Abu-Sahlieh, Sami A., 2006. “Male and Female Circumcision: The Myth of the Difference” in Rogaia, Mustafa Abusharaf (Ed.), Female Circumcision: Multicultural Perspectives (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), pp. 47–74.Google Scholar
Aldeeb, Abu-Sahlieh Sami A., 1994. “To Mutilate in the Name of Jehovah or Allah: Legitimization of Male and Female Circumcision,” Medicine and Law, 13(7–8): 575–622.Google Scholar
Ali, Shaheen Sardar, 2013. “Authority and Authenticity: Sharia Councils, Muslim Women’s Rights, and the English Courts,” Child and Family Law Quarterly, 25: 113–37.Google Scholar
Almog, Shulamit, 2000. Law and Literature (Jerusalem: Nevo). [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Altink, Henrice and Chris, Weedon, 2010. “Introduction” in Aaron, Jane, Altink, Henrice and Weedon, Chris (Eds.), Gendering Border Studies (Cardiff: University of Wales Press), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Amato, Paul R., 1998. “More Than Money? Men’s Contributions to Their Children’s Lives” in Booth, Alan and Crouter, Ann C. (Eds.), Men in Families: When Do They Get Involved? What Difference Does It Make? (New York: Psychology Press), pp. 241–78.Google Scholar
André, Géraldine and Marie, Godin, 2014. “Child Labour, Agency and Family Dynamics,” Childhood, 21(2): 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreß, Hans-Jürgen, Barbara, Borgloh, Miriam, Bröckel, Marco, Giesselmann and Dina, Hummelsheim, 2006. “The Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution: A Comparative Analysis of Panel Studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy and Sweden,” European Sociological Review, 22(5): 533–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andro, Armelle, Emmanuelle, Cambois, and Marie, Lesclingand, 2014. “Long-Term Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation in a European Context: Self Perceived Health of FGM Women Compared to Non FGM Women,” Social Science & Medicine, 106: 177–84.Google Scholar
Anu, Kumar Pawan, Deep, Inder, and Nandini, Sharma, 2013. “Surrogacy and Women’s Right to Health in India: Issues and Perspective,” Indian Journal of Public Health, 57(2): 65–70.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun (Ed.), 2003. Globalization (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun, 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
Arbel, Efrat, 2013. “The Culture of Rights Protection in Canadian Refugee Law: Examining the Domestic Violence Cases,” McGill Law Journal, 58(3): 729–71.Google Scholar
Ashe, Marie and Anissa, Hélie, 2013. “Realities of Religio-Legalism: Religious Courts and Women’s Rights in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States,” UC Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, 20(2): 139–209.Google Scholar
Aviram, Hadar, 2010. “Does the Law Achieve Its Goals? Answers from the Empirical Research World” in Hacker, Daphna and Ziv, Neta (Eds.), Does the Law Matter? (Tel Aviv University), pp. 27–62. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Ayalon, Liat, 2011. “Examining Satisfaction with Live-in Foreign Home Care in Israel from the Perspectives of Care Recipients, Their Family Members, and Their Foreign Care Workers,” Aging & Mental Health, 15(3): 376–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayalon, Liat, 2009. “Evaluating the Working Conditions and Exposure to Abuse of Filipino Home Care Workers in Israel: Characteristics and Clinical Correlates,” International Psychogeriatrics, 21(1): 40–9.Google Scholar
Ayalon, Liat, 2009. “Family and Family-Like Interactions in Households with Round-the-Clock Paid Foreign Carers in Israel,” Ageing & Society, 29(5): 671–86.Google Scholar
Baal, Shem Yaacov and Shinar, Duv, 1998. “The Telepresence Era: Global Village or ‘Media Slums,’” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 17(1): 28–35.Google Scholar
Bacik, Ivana, 2013. “The Irish Constitution and Gender Politics: Development in the Law on Abortion,” Irish Political Studies, 28(3): 380–98.Google Scholar
Bailey, Alison, 2011. “Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy,” Hypatia, 26(4): 715–41.Google Scholar
Baines, Beverley, 2006. “Equality’s Nemesis?” Journal of Law and Equality, 5(1): 57–80.Google Scholar
Baker, Hannah, 2013. “A Possible Future Instrument on International Surrogacy Arrangements: Are There ‘Lessons’ to be Learned from the 1993 Hague Intercountry Adoption Convention?” in Trimmings, Katarina and Beaumont, Paul (Eds.), International Surrogacy Arrangements (Oxford, UK: Hart), pp. 411–26.Google Scholar
Bakht, Natasha, 2004. “Family Arbitration Using Sharia Law: Examining Ontario’s Arbitration Act and its Impact on Women,” Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 1(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Balagopalan, Sarada, 2008. “Memories of Tomorrow: Children, Labor, and the Panacea of Formal Schooling,” Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth, 1(2): 267–85.Google Scholar
Balibar, Étienne, 2004. We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Ballard, Robert L., 2015. “Introduction” in Ballard, Robert L., Goodno, Naomi H., Cochran, Robert F., and Milbrandt, A. (Eds.), The Intercountry Adoption Debate (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Bano, Samia, 2007. “Islamic Family Arbitration, Justice and Human Rights in Britain,” Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal, 1: 1–26, available at www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2007_1/bano/.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin, 1995. Jihad versus McWorld (New York: Times Books).Google Scholar
Barnett, Ola W., Miller-Perrin, Cindy L., and Perrin, Robin D., 2011. Family Violence across the Lifespan: An Introduction, 3rd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
Barrientos, Armando, Gorman, Mark, and Heslop, Amanda, 2003. “Old Age Poverty in Developing Countries: Contributions and Dependence in Later Life,” World Development- Chronic Poverty and Development Policy, 31(3): 555–70.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2015. “The Hague Convention: Pros, Cons and Potential” in Ballard, Robert L., Goodno, Naomi H., Cochran, Robert F., and Milbrandt, Jay A. (Eds.), The Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues across Disciplines (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 239–44.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2015. “The International Adoption Cliff: Do Child Human Rights Matter?” in Ballard, Robert L., Goodno, Naomi H., Cochran, Robert F., and Milbrandt, Jay A. (Eds.), The Intercountry Adoption Debate: Dialogues across Disciplines (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 193–202.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2010/2011. “International Adoption: A Way Forward,” New York Law School Law Review, 55: 687–99.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2007. “International Adoption: The Child’s Story,” Georgia State University Law Review, 24(2): 333–379.Google Scholar
Bartholet, Elizabeth, 2006. “International Adoption” in Askeland, Lori (Ed.), Children and Youth in Adoption, Orphanages, and Foster Care (London: Greenwood Press), pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
Basu, Kaushik,1999. “Child Labor: Cause, Consequence, and Cure, with Remarks on International Labor Standards,” Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3): 1083–119.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt, 1998. Globalization: The Human Consequences (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Bauserman, Robert, 2002. “Child Adjustment in Joint-Custody Versus Sole-Custody Arrangements: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1): 91–102.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, 2006. “Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda,” The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, 1992 . Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage).Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth, 2014. Distant Love (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Beck Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim Elisabeth, 2007. “Families in a Runaway World” in Scott, Jacqueline, Treas, Judith and Richards, Martin (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 499–514.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich and Elisabeth, Beck-Gernsheim, 1995. The Normal Chaos of Love (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Bélanger, Danièle and Tran, Giang Linh, 2011. “The Impact of Transnational Migration on Gender and Marriage in Sending Communities of Vietnam,” Current Sociology, 59(1): 59–77.Google Scholar
Ben-Naftali, Orna and Yuval, Shany, 2006. International Law between War and Peace (Tel Aviv: Ramot). [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Benedict, Anderson, 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. edn. (London: Verso).Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, 2013. “Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders,” American Journal of International Law, 107(2): 295–333.Google Scholar
Berg, Rigmor C. and Denison, Eva, 2012. “Interventions to Reduce the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/ Cutting in African Countries,” Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(9): 1–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkovitch, Nitza, 1999. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women’s Rights and International Organizations (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff, 2005. The Globalization of International Law (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Gaia and Triger, Zvi, 2011. “Over-Parenting,” UC Davis Law Review, 44(4): 1221–79.Google Scholar
Bessell, Sharon, 2011. “Influencing International Child Labour Policy: The Potential and Limits of Children-Centred Research,” Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4): 564–68.Google Scholar
Bettio, Francesca, Simonazzi, Annamaria, and Villa, Paola, 2006. “Change in Care Regimes and Female Migration: The ‘Care Drain’ in the Mediterranean,” Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3): 271–85.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Jacqueline, 2003. “The Citizenship Deficit: On Being a Citizen Child,” Development, 46(3): 53–9.Google Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna, 2016. “Thirty-five Years of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Israel,” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 2: 16–23, available at www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661816300090.Google Scholar
Blair, Marrianne D., Weiner, Merle H., Stark, Barbara, and Maldonado, Solangel (Eds.), 2009. Family Law in the World Community: Cases, Materials, and Problems in Comparative and International Family Law, 2nd edn. (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press).Google Scholar
Blecher-Prigat, Ayelet, 2012. “The Costs of Raising Children: Towards a Theory of Financial Obligations between Co-Parents,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1): 154–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecher-Prigat, Ayelet, 2010. “The Family and the Law?” in Hacker, Daphna and Ziv, Neta (Eds.), Does the Law Matter? (Tel Aviv University), pp. 275–304. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Bloomer, Fiona and O’Dowd, Kellie, 2014, “Restricted Access to Abortion in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: Exploring Abortion Tourism and Barriers to Legal Reform,” Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(4): 366–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blyth, Eric, 2010. “Fertility Patients’ Experiences of Cross-Border Reproductive Care,” Fertility & Sterility, 94(1): e11–e15, available at www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(10)00106-8/fulltext.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boccagni, Paolo, 2013. “Migration and the Family Transformations It ‘Leaves Behind’: A Critical View from Ecuador,” The Latin Americanist, 57(4): 3–24.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, Tom, 2008 . Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia and de Hart, Betty, 2013. “A Proper Wife, a Proper Marriage: Constructions of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Dutch Family Migration Policy,” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(1): 61–76.Google Scholar
Bookey, Blaine, 2016. “Gender- Based Asylum Post- Matter of A-R-C-G: Evolving Standards and Fair Application of the Law,” Southwestern Journal of International Law, 22: 1–19.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda, 2006. The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1996. “On the Family as a Realized Category,” Theory, Culture & Society, 13(3): 19–26.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1987. “The Force of Law: Towards a Sociology of the Juridical Field,” Hastings Law Journal, 38: 814–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Richard, Nice (Trans.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Bourdillon, Michael, 2006. “Children and Work: A Review of Current Literature and Debates,” Development & Change, 37(6): 1201–27.Google Scholar
Boyd, Susan S., 2010. “Autonomy for Mothers? Relational Theory and Parenting Apart,” Feminist Legal Studies, 18(2): 137–58.Google Scholar
Brandt, Martina, Haberkern, Klaus, and Szydlik, Marc, 2009. “Intergenerational Help and Care in Europe,” European Sociological Review, 25(5): 585–601.Google Scholar
Breuning, Marijka, 2013. “Samaritans, Family Builders, and the Politics of Intercountry Adoption,” International Studies Perspectives, 14(4): 417–35.Google Scholar
Brining, Margaret F., Schneider, Carl E., and Teitelbaum, Lee E. (Eds.), 1999. Family Law in Action: A Reader (Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing).Google Scholar
Brod, Frommer Gail, 1994. “Premarital Agreement and Gender Justice,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 6: 229–95.Google Scholar
Browne, Collette V. and Braun, Kathryn L., 2008. “Globalization, Women’s Migration, and the Long-Term-Care Workforce,” The Gerontologist, 48(1): 16–24.Google Scholar
Browne, Noah L., 2011. “Relevance and Fairness: Protecting the Rights of Domestic Violence Victims and Left-Behind Fathers under the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction,” Duke Law Journal, 60:1193–238.Google Scholar
Broyde, Michael J., 2011. “New York’s Regulation of Jewish Marriage: Covenant, Contract, or Statute?” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 138–63.Google Scholar
Bruch, Carol S., 2014. “The Unmet Needs of Domestic Violence Victims and Their Children in Hague Child Abduction Convention Cases,” Family Law Quarterly, 38(3): 529–45.Google Scholar
Bryceson, Deborah and Ulla, Vuorela (Eds.), 2002. The Transnational Family: New Frontiers and Global Networks (Oxford, UK: Berg).Google Scholar
Büchler, Andrea, 2011. Islamic Law in Europe?: Legal Pluralism and Its Limits in European Family Laws (Surrey: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Buck, Trevor, 2014. International Child Law, 3rd edn. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Budlender, Debbie and Lund, Francie, 2011. “South Africa: A Legacy of Family Disruption,” Development and Change, 42(4): 925–46.Google Scholar
Burau, Viola, Theobald, Hildegard, and Blank, Robert H., 2007. Governing Home Care: A Cross-National Comparison (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Cameron, David R., Ranis, Gustav, and Zinn, Anaalisa (Eds.), 2006. Globalization and Self-Determination: Is the Nation-State under Siege? (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Cangiano, Alessio, 2014. “Elder Care and Migrant Labor in Europe: A Demographic Outlook, Data and Perspectives,” Population and Development Review, 40(1): 131–54.Google Scholar
Carbone, June, 2014. “Legal Applications of the ‘Best Interest of the Child’ Standard: Judicial Rationalization or a Measure of Institutional Competence?” Pediatrics, 134: S111–20.Google Scholar
Carlson, Richard, 2011. “Seeking the Better Interests of Children with a New International Law of Adoption,” New York Law School Law Review, 55(3): 733–79.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet, 2004. After Kinship (UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Castañeda, Ernesto, 2012. “Living in Limbo: Transnational Households, Remittances and Development,” International Migration, 51(s1), e13–e35, at e27, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2012.00745.x/full.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Ernesto and Buck, Lesley, 2014. “A Family of Strangers: Transnational Parenting and the Consequences of Family Separation due to Undocumented Migration” in Lorentzen, Lois Ann (Ed.), Hidden Lives and Human Rights in America: Understanding the Controversies and Tragedies of Undocumented Immigration (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger), pp. 175–202.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Ernesto and Buck, Lesley, 2011. “Remittances, Transnational Parenting, and the Children Left Behind: Economic and Psychological Implications,” The Latin Americanist, 55(4): 85–110.Google Scholar
Castels, Stephen and Miller, Mark J., 1998. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World, 2nd edn. (Hampshire: Macmillan Press).Google Scholar
Chalfin, Brenda, 2012. “Border Security as Late-Capitalist “Fix”” in Wilson, Thomas M. and Donnan, Hastings (Eds.), A Companion to Border Studies (Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell), pp. 283–300.Google Scholar
Champenois, Christina, 2015. “Does the Russian Adoption Ban Violate International Law?” Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review, 11(2): 29–54.Google Scholar
Chantler, Khatidja, Gangoli, Geetanjali, and Hester, Marianne, 2009. “Forced Marriage in the UK: Religious, Cultural, Economic or State Violence?” Critical Social Policy, 29(4): 587–612.Google Scholar
Charsley, Katharine, Storer-Church, Brooke, Benson, Michaela, and Van Hear, Nicholas, 2012. “Marriage-Related Migration to the UK,” International Migration Review, 46(4): 861–90.Google Scholar
Cheney, Kristen, 2014. “‘Giving Children a Better Life?’ Reconsidering Social Reproduction, Humanitarianism and Development in Intercountry Adoption,” European Journal of Development Research, 26(2): 247–63.Google Scholar
Christian, Sandvig, 2013. “The Internet as Infrastructure” in Dutton, William H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (Oxford University Press), pp. 86–106.Google Scholar
Coe, Cati, 2011. “What is Love? The Materiality of Care in Ghanaian Transnational Families,” International Migration, 49(6): 7–24.Google Scholar
Cohen, Daniel, 2007. Globalization and Its Enemies (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey H., 2005. “Remittance Outcomes and Migration: Theoretical Contests, Real Opportunities,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(1): 88–112.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C., 1999. (Eds.), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Cole, Jennifer and Durham, Deborah (Eds.), 2007. Generations and Globalization (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Collins, Kristin A., 2014. “Illegitimate Borders: Jus Sanguinis, Citizenship and the Legal Construction of Family, Race, and Nation,” Yale Law Journal, 123(7): 2167–206.Google Scholar
Colombo, Asher D., 2007. “‘They Call Me a Housekeeper, but I Do Everything.’ Who Are Domestic Workers Today in Italy and What Do They Do?” Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 12(2): 207–37.Google Scholar
Conroy, Amanda, 2012. “Book Review: Jane Aaron, Henrice Altink and Chris Weedon (Eds.), Gendering Border Studies, Cardiff: University of Wales Press,” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19: 399–402.Google Scholar
Constable, Nicole, 2013. “Migrant Workers, Legal Tactics, and Fragile Family Formation in Hong Kong,” Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 3(6): 1004–22.Google Scholar
Cooper, Anthony, Perkins, Chris, and Rumford, Chris, 2014. “The Vernacularization of Borders” in Reece, Jones and Corey, Johnson (Eds.), Placing the Border in Everyday Life (Surrey: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Crowther, Ann Luerssen, 2000. “Empty Gestures: The (In)Significance of Recent Attempts to Liberalize Algerian Family Law,” William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 6(3): 611–43.Google Scholar
Cruz, Evelyn Haydee, 2010. “Because You’re Mine, I Walk the Line: The Trials and Tribulations of the Family Visa Program,” Fordham URB Law Journal, 38(1): 155–81.Google Scholar
Curry, Amberlynn, 2010. “The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act and Its Variations throughout the States,” Journal of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 23: 284–355.Google Scholar
Dancig-Rosenberg, Hadar and Levenkron, Naomi, 2015. “Migratory Violence,” Tel Aviv University Law Review, 37(2): 341–88. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine, 2009. “Globalization Fragmentation: New Pressures on Women Caught in the Immigration Law-Citizenship Law Dichotomy” in Benhabib, Seyla and Resnik, Judith (Eds.), Migration and Mobilities: Citizenship, Borders and Gender (New York University Press), pp. 333–54.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Catherine, 2007. “Citizenship with a Vengeance,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 489–507.Google Scholar
Davidov, Guy, Yovel, Jonathan, Saban, Ilan, and Reichman, Amnon, 2005. “State or Family? The 2003 Amendment to the Citizenship and Entrance to Israel Law,” Mishpat Umimshal, 8: 643–99. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
de Blois, Matthijs, 2010. “Religious Law versus Secular Law: The Example of the Get Refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli Law,” Utrecht Law Review, 6(2): 93–114.Google Scholar
de Boer, Ted M., 2008. “The Second Revision of the Brussels II Regulation: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law” in Boele-Woelki, Katharina and Sverdrup, Tone (Eds.), European Challenges in Contemporary Family Law (Antwerp: Intersentia), pp. 321–41.Google Scholar
DeBose, Hawkins Cynthia and DeAngelo, Ekaterina, 2015. “The New Cold War: Russia’s Ban on Adoptions by U.S. Citizens,” Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 28(1): 51–77.Google Scholar
de Hart, Betty, 2009. “Love Thy Neighbour: Family Reunification and the Right of Insiders,” European Journal of Migration and the Law, 11(3): 235–52.Google Scholar
de Hart, Betty, 2006. “Introduction: The Marriage of Convenience in European Immigration Law,” European Journal of Migration and Law, 8(3–4): 251–62.Google Scholar
Dejmanee, Tisha, 2015. “Nursing at the Screen: Post Post-Feminist Daughters and Demonized Mothers on Toddlers and Tiaras,” Feminist Media Studies, 15(3): 460–73.Google Scholar
Delanty, Gerald, 2007. “European Citizenship: A Critical Assessment,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 63–72.Google Scholar
Demleitner, Nora V., 2003. “How Much Do Western Democracies Value Family and Marriage?: Immigration Law’s Conflicted Answers,” Hofstra Law Review, 32(1): 273–311.Google Scholar
Deomampo, Daisy, 2013. “Transnational Surrogacy in India: Interrogating Power and Women’s Agency,” Frontier: A Journal of Women’s Studies, 34(3): 167–88.Google Scholar
Dewer, John and Parker, Stephen, 2000. “English Family Law Since World War II: From Status to Chaos” in Katz, Stanford N., Eekelaar, John and Maclean, Mavis (Eds.), Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the US and England (Oxford University Press), pp. 123–40.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Bryant, Garth G. (Eds.), 2002. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diduck, Alison and Kaganas, Felicity, 2006. Family Law, Gender, and the State: Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
DiFonzo, J. Herbie, 2015. “Dilemmas of Shared Parenting in the 21st Century: How Law and Culture Shape Child Custody,” Hofstra Law Review, 43(4): 1003–24.Google Scholar
Dobrowolsky, Alexandra, 2007. “(In)Security and Citizenship: Security, Im/migration and Shrinking Citizenship Regimes,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 629–61.Google Scholar
Donati, Pierpaolo, 1998. “The New Citizenship of the Family” in Matthijs, Koen (Ed.), The Family: Contemporary Perspectives and Challenges (Leuven University Press), pp. 243–61.Google Scholar
Doron, Israel and Golan, Tal, 2007. “Aging, Globalization and the Legal Construction of “Residence”: The Case of Old Age Pensions in Israel,” The Elder Law Journal, 15(1): 1–50.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Douglas, Sarat, Austin, and Umphery, Martha Merrill, 2006. “Theoretical Perspectives on Lives in the Law: An Introduction” in Sarat, Austin, Lawrence, Douglas and Umphery, Martha Merrill (Eds.), Lives in the Law (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Dragiewicz, Molly, 2011. Equality with a Vengeance: Men’s Rights Groups, Battered Women, and Antifeminist Backlash (Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press).Google Scholar
Dreby, Joanna, 2015. “U.S. Immigration Policy and Family Separation: The Consequences for Children’s Well-being,” Social Science & Medicine, 132: 245–51.Google Scholar
duRivage, Nathalie, Keyes, Katherine, Leray, Emmanuelle, Pez, Ondine, Bitfoi, Adina, Koç, Ceren, Goelitz, Dietmar, Kuijpers, Rowella, Lesinskiene, Sigita, Mihova, Zlatka, Otten, Roy, Fermanian, Christophe, and Kovess-Masfety, Viviane, 2015. “Parental Use of Corporal Punishment in Europe: Intersection Between Public Health and Policy,” PloS ONE, 10(2), available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326463/.Google Scholar
Dustin, Moira, 2010. “Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the UK,” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17(1): 7–23.Google Scholar
Dwyer, James G., 2016. “Diagnosing and Dispelling Denialism Regarding Children” in Moerland, Ronald, Nelen, Hans, and Willems, Jan C. M. (Eds.), Denialism and Human Rights (Cambridge: Intersentia), pp. 49–68.Google Scholar
Earp, Brian D., 2016. “Between Moral Relativism and Moral Hypocrisy: Reframing the Debate on FGM,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 26(2): 105–44.Google Scholar
Earp, Brian D., 2015. “Female Genital Mutilation and Male Circumcision: Toward an Autonomy- Based Ethical Framework,” Medicolegal and Bioethics, 5: 89–104.Google Scholar
Ebaugh, Helen Rose and Curry, Mary, 2000. “Fictive Kin as Social Capital in New Immigrant Communities,” Sociological Perspectives, 43(2): 189–209.Google Scholar
Edwards, Benjamin P., 2013. “Welcoming A Post-Doma World: Same-Sex Spousal Petitions and Other Post-Windsor Immigration Implications,” Family Law Quarterly, 47(2): 173–89.Google Scholar
Edwards, Rosalind and Gillies, Val, 2012. “Farewell to Family? Notes on an Argument for Retaining the Concept,” Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(1): 63–9.Google Scholar
Eekelaar, John and George, Rob (Eds.), 2014. Routledge Handbook of Family Law and Policy (Abingdon: Routledge Handbooks).Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodor, 2000. “Empirical Methods and the Law,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95: 665–9.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Vivienne, 2016. “Child Custody” in Shehan, Constance L. (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs107/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=.Google Scholar
Elkins, Jeremy, 2011. “Beyond ‘Beyond the State’: Rethinking Law and Globalization” in Sarat, Austin, Douglas, Lawrence, and Umphrey, Martha Merrill (Eds.), Law without Nations (CA: Stanford University Press), pp. 22–65.Google Scholar
Enchautegui, María E. and Menjívar, Cecilia, 2015. “Paradoxes of Family Immigration Policy: Separation, Reorganization, and Reunification of Families under Current Immigration Laws,” Law & Policy, 37(1–2): 32–60.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich, 1985. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Erel, Umut, 2012. “Introduction: Transnational Care in Europe – Changing Formations of Citizenship, Family, and Generation,” Social Politics, 19(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Erez, Edna, Adelman, Madelaine, and Gregory, Carol, 2009. “Intersections of Immigration and Domestic Violence: Voices of Battered Immigrant Women,” Feminist Criminology, 4(1): 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergas, Yasmine, 2013. “Thinking ‘through’ Human Rights: The Need for a Human Rights Perspective with Respect to the Regulation of Cross-Border Reproduction Surrogacy” in Trimmings, Katarina and Beaumont, Paul (Eds.), International Surrogacy Arrangements (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing), pp. 427–34.Google Scholar
Erikson, Thomas Hylland, 2007. Globalization: The Key Concepts (Oxford, UK: Berg).Google Scholar
Estin, Ann Laquer, 2014. “Foreign and Religious Law: Comity, Contract, and Constitution,” Pepperdine Law Review, 41(5): 1029–47.Google Scholar
Estin, Ann Laquer, 2012. “Unofficial Family Law” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 92–119.Google Scholar
Estin, Ann Laquar and Barbara, Stark, 2007. Global Issues in Family Law (Eagan, MN: Thomson/West).Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, 2004. “Consciousness and Ideology” in Sarat, Austin (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 80–94.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S., 1998. The Common Place of Law (University of Chicago).Google Scholar
Ezer, Nicole Lawrence, 2006. “The Intersection of Immigration Law and Family Law,” Family Law Quarterly, 40(3): 339–66.Google Scholar
Farid, Mahsa, 2012. “International Adoption: The Economics of the Baby Industry,” Whittier Journal of Child and Family Advocacy, 12(1): 81–103.Google Scholar
Finch, Janet, 2007. “Displaying Families,” Sociology, 41(1): 65–81.Google Scholar
Fineman, Albertson Martha, 2001. “Why Marriage?” Virginia Journal of Social Policy & Law, 9: 239–71.Google Scholar
Fishman, Ted C., 2010. Shock of Gray: The Aging of the World’s Population and How It Pits Young Against Old, Child Against Parent, Worker Against Boss, Company against Rival, and Nation Against Nation (New York: Scribner).Google Scholar
Fletcher, Ruth, 2000. National Crisis, Supranational Opportunity: The Irish Constitution of Abortion as a European Service,” Reproductive Health Matters, 8(6): 35–44.Google Scholar
Foblets, Marie-Claire and Vanheule, Dirk, 2006, “Marriage of Convenience in Belgium: the Punitive Approach Gains Ground in Migration Law,” European Journal of Migration and Law, 8(3–4): 263–80.Google Scholar
Fogiel-Bijaoui, Sylvie, 2002. “Familism, Postmodernity and the State: The Case of Israel,” Journal of Israeli History: Politics, Society, Culture, 21(1–2): 38–62.Google Scholar
Fogiel-Bijaoui, Sylvie, 1999. “Families in Israel: Between Familism and Post-Modernism” in Izraeli, Dafna, Friedman, Ariella, Dahan-Kalev, Henriette, Fogiel-Bijaoui, Sylvie, Hassan, Manar, Herzog, Hannah, and Naveh, Hannah (Eds.), Sex, Gender and Politics (Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad), pp. 107–66. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Folberg, Jay and Milne, Ann (Eds.), 1988. Divorce Mediation: Theory and Practice (New York: Guilford Press).Google Scholar
Fonseca, Claudia, 2006. “Transnational Influences in the Social Production of Adoptable Children: The Case of Brazil,” The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(3/4): 154–71.Google Scholar
Fontana, Lorenza B. and Grugel, Jean, 2015. “To Eradicate or to Legalize? Child Labor Debates and ILO Convention 182 in Bolivia,” Global Governance, 21(1): 61–78.Google Scholar
Fournier, Pascale, 2010. Muslim Marriages in Western Courts: Lost in Transplantation (Surrey: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael, 2007. “Article 3: The Best Interests of the Child” in Alen, André, Vande, Lanotte Johan, Verhallen, Eugeen, Ang, Fiona, Berghmans, Eva, and Verheyde, Mieke (Eds.), A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Leiden: Brill), pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael, 1995. “The Morality of Cultural Pluralism,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 3: 1–17.Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael D. A., 1999. “A Child’s Right to Circumcision,” BJU International, 83(1): 74–8.Google Scholar
Friedman, May and Schultermandl, Silvia (Eds.), 2011. Growing Up Transnational: Identity and Kinship in a Global Era (University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Friedman, Sara L., 2012. “Adjudicating the Intersection of Marital Immigration, Domestic Violence, and Spousal Murder: China Taiwan Marriages and Competing Legal Domains,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 19(1): 221–55.Google Scholar
Friedman, Sara L., 2010.“Determining the ‘Truth’ at the Border: Immigration Interviews, Chinese Marital Migrants, and Taiwan’s Sovereignty Dilemmas,” Citizenship Studies, 14(2): 167–83.Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas L., 2007. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (New York.: Picador).Google Scholar
Fuchs, Christian, 2008. Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Fun, Cindy C. and San, Mingjie, 2011. “Migration and Split Households: A Comparison of Sole, Couple, and Family Migrants in Beijing, China,” Environment and Planning, 43: 2164–85.Google Scholar
Gangoli, Geetanjali and Chantler, Khatidja, 2009. “Protecting Victims of Forced Marriage: Is Age a Protective Factor?” Feminist Legal Studies, 17(3): 267–88.Google Scholar
Ganster, Paul and Lorey, David E. (Eds.), 2005. Borders and Border Politics in a Globalizing World (Lanham, MD: SR Books).Google Scholar
Gardner, Andrew M., 2011. “Gulf Migration and the Family,” Journal of Arabian Studies, 1(1): 3–25.Google Scholar
Garrison, Marsha and Scott, Elizabeth S., 2012. “Legal Regulation of Twenty-First Century Families” in Garrison, Marsha and Scott, Elizabeth S. (Eds.), Marriage at the Crossroads (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 303–25.Google Scholar
Gesneer, Volkmar and Budak, Ali Cem (Eds.), 1998. Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law (Aldershot: Dartmouth).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony, 2000. Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping our Lives (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, 1989. The Transformation of Family Law (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Glennon, Theresa, 2009. “Divided Parents, Shared Children: Conflicting Approaches to Relocation Disputes in the USA” in Boele-Woelki, Katharina (Ed.), Debates in Family Law around the Globe at the Dawn of the 21st Century (Antwerp: Intersentia), pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
Luin, Goldring, 2003. “Re-Thinking Remittances: Social and Political Dimensions of Individual and Collective Remittances,” CERLAC Working Paper Series, York University.Google Scholar
Gollaher, David L., 2000. Circumcision: A History of the World’s Most Controversial Surgery (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Gornick, Janet C. and Meyers, Marcia K. (Eds.), 2009. Gender Equality: Transforming Family Divisions of Labor (New York: Verso Press).Google Scholar
Goulbourne, Harry, Reynolds, Tracy, Solomon, John, and Zontint, Elisabetta, 2010. Transnational Families: Ethnicities, Identities and Social Capital (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Graham, Elspeth and Jordan, Lucy P., 2011. “Migrant Parents and the Psychological Well-Being of Left-Behind Children in Southeast Asia,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4): 763–87.Google Scholar
Graycar, Reg, 2012. “Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1): 241–69.Google Scholar
Green, Ohad and Ayalon, Liat, 2015. “Whose Right is it Anyway? Familiarity with Workers’ Rights among Older Adults, Family Caregivers, and Migrant Live-In Home Care Workers: Implications for Policy and Practice,” Educational Gerontology, 41(7): 471–81.Google Scholar
Green, Sarah, 2012. “A Sense of Border” in Wilson, Thomas M. and Donnan, Hastings (Eds.), A Companion to Border Studies (Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell), pp. 573–92.Google Scholar
Greenberg-Kobrin, Michelle, 2014. “Religious Tribunals and Secular Courts: Navigating Power and Powerlessness,” Pepperdine Law Review, 41(5): 997–1012.Google Scholar
Grey, Colin, 2015. Justice and Authority in Immigration Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
Gross, Aeyal M., 2007. “In Love with the Enemy: Justice, Truth, Integrity and Common Sense between Israel and Utopia in the Citizenship Law Case,” Hamishpat, 23: 79–85. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael, 2000. “How to Give the Present a Past? Family Law in the United States 1950–2000” in Katz, Stanford N., Eekelaar, John, and Maclean, Mavis (Eds.), Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the US and England (Oxford University Press), pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Gruenbaum, Ellen, 2001. The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunputh, Rajendra Parsad and Choong, Kartina Aisha, 2015. “Surrogacy Tourism: The Ethical and Legal Challenges,” International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 15(1–2): 16–21.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, 2015. “Strategic Compliance in the Shadow of Transnational Anti-Trafficking Law,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 28(1): 11–64.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, 2015. “The Rights of the Dead through the Prism of Israeli Succession Disputes,” International Journal of Law in Context, 11(1): 40–58.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, 2014. “Disappointed ‘Heirs’ as a Socio-Legal Phenomenon,” Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 4(2): 243–63.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, 2012. “Religious Tribunals in Democratic States: Lesson from the Israeli Rabbinical Courts,” Journal of Law and Religion, 27(1): 59–82.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, 2011. “Law and Society Jurisprudence,” Cornell Law Review, 96: 727–48.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, 2009. “From the Moabite Ruth to Norly the Filipino: Intermarriage and Conversion in the Jewish Nation State” in Herzog, Hanna and Braude, Ann (Eds.), Gendering Religion and Politics: Untangling Modernities (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 101–24.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, 2008. “A Legal Field in Action: The Case of Divorce Arrangements in Israel,” International Journal of Law in Context, 4(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna, 2001. “Single and Married Women in the Law of Israel – A Feminist Perspective,” Feminist Legal Studies, 9(1): 29–56.Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna and Halperin, Kaddari Ruth, 2013. “The Ruling Rules in Custody Disputers – On the Dangers of the Parental Sameness Illusion in a Gendered Reality,” Mishpat and Mimshal, 15: 91–170. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Hacker, Daphna and Liberson, Roni, 2010. “Cross Boarders Families in Israel: Between Individualism, Globalization and the Ethnos,” College of Management Law Review, 15(2): 509–29. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Hagestad, Gunhild O., 1991. “The Aging Society as a Context for Family Life” in Jecker, Nancy S. (Ed.), Aging and Ethics: Philosophical Problems in Gerontology (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), pp. 123–46.Google Scholar
Hall, Elizabeth C., 2011. “Where Are My Children ... and My Rights? Parental Rights Termination as a Consequence of Deportation,” Duke Law Journal, 60(6): 1459–504.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B., 2014. An Introduction to Islamic Law (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Halley, Janet, 2011. “What Is Family Law?: A Genealogy Part I,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 23(1): 1–109.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet, 2011. “What Is Family Law?: A Genealogy Part II,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 23(2): 189–293.Google Scholar
Handell, Günther, Zekoll, Joachim, and Zumbansen, Peer, 2012. Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).Google Scholar
Hanson, Karl, Volonakis, Diana, and Al-Rozzi, Mohammed, 2015. “Child Labour, Working Children and Children’s Rights” in Vandenhole, Wouter, Desmet, Ellen, Reynaert, Didier and Lembrechts, Sara (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Children’s Rights Studies (London: Routledge), pp. 316–30.Google Scholar
Hanson, Karl and Vandaele, Arne, 2003. “Working Children and International Labour Law: A Critical Analysis,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 11(1): 73–146.Google Scholar
Harari, Yuval Noah, 2012 . Sapiens: A Brief History of Mankind (London: Harvill Secker).Google Scholar
Hargittai, Eszter and Hsieh, Yuli Patick, 2013. “Digital Inequality” in Dutton, William H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (Oxford University Press), pp. 129–150.Google Scholar
Hashiloni-Dolev, Yael, 2015. “Posthumous Reproduction (PHR) in Israel: Policy Rationales versus Lay People’s Concerns, a Preliminary Study,” Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, 39 (4): 634–50.Google Scholar
Hashiloni-Dolev, Yael, 2013. The Fertility Revolution (Moshav Ben-Shemen: Modan). [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Herring, Jonathan, 2009. Older People in Law and Society (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
High, Anna Jane, 2014. “Pondering the Politicization of Intercountry Adoption: Russia’s Ban on American ‘Forever Families’,” Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 22(3): 497–560.Google Scholar
Hill, Twyla J., 2007. “Legalized Grandparenthood: A Content Analysis of State Legislation,” Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 5(2): 61–80.Google Scholar
Hill, Twyla J., 2002. “Grandparents in Law: Investigating the Institutionalization of Extended Family Roles,” The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 54(1): 43–56.Google Scholar
Hing, Bill Ong, 2006. Deporting Our Souls: Values, Morality, and Immigration Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell, 2004. “Love and Gold” in Ehrenreich, Barbara and Hochschild, Arlie Russell (Eds.), Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy (New York: Henry Holt and Company), pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
Hodson, David, 2012. The International Family Law Practice, 2nd edn. (Bristol: Family Law).Google Scholar
Hoff, Andreas, Feldman, Susan, and Vidovicova, Lucie, 2010. “Migrant Home Care Workers Caring for Older People: Fictive Kin, Substitute, and Complementary Family Caregivers in an Ethnically Diverse Environment,” International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 5(2): 7–16.Google Scholar
Holden, Karen C. and Smoke, Pamela J., 1991. “The Economic Costs of Marital Dissolution: Why Do Women Bear a Disproportionate Cost?” Annual Review of Sociology, 17: 51–78.Google Scholar
Holland, Audrey, 2008. “The Modern Family Unit: Towards a More Inclusive Vision of the Family in Immigration Law,” California Law Review, 96(4): 1049–91.Google Scholar
Hong, Kari E., 2014. “Famigration (Fam Imm): The Next Frontier in Immigration Law,” Virginia Law Review Online, 100: 63–81.Google Scholar
Honohan, Iseult, 2009. “Reconsidering the Claim to Family Reunification in Migration,” Political Studies, 57(4): 768–87.Google Scholar
Horn, Vincent, Schweppe, Cornelia, and Um, Seong-gee, 2013. “Transnational Aging – A Young Field of Research,” Transnational Social Review, 3(1): 7–10.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala and Weldon, Laurel S., 2011. “State Power, Religion, and Women’s Rights: A Comparative Analysis of Family Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18(1): 145–65.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan, 1993. Explorations in Law and Society (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan and Wickham, Gary, 1994. Foucault and Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar
Iecovich, Esther, 2016. “Migrant Homecare Workers in Elder Care: The State of the Art” in Karl, Ute and Torres, Sandra (Eds.), Ageing in Contexts of Migration (Oxon: Routledge), pp. 147–58.Google Scholar
Iecovich, Esther, 2010. “Primary Caregivers and Foreign Caregivers of the Elderly: Variables Explaining Burden and Care Satisfaction of the Primary Caregiver and the Foreign Caregiver,” Research Report, Ben-Gurion University. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Iecovich, Esther, 2007. “Client Satisfaction with Live-in and Live-out Home Care Workers in Israel,” Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 19(4): 105–22.Google Scholar
Iecovich, Esther and Doron, Israel, 2012. “Migrant Workers in Eldercare in Israel: Social and Legal Aspects,” European Journal of Social Work, 15(1): 29–44.Google Scholar
Ikuomola, Adediran Daniel, 2015. “Unintended Consequences of Remittance: Nigerian Migrants and Intra-Household Conflicts,” SAGE Open, 5(3): 1–8, available at: http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/spsgo/5/3/2158244015605353.full.pdf.Google Scholar
Inhorn, Marcia C., 2009. “Rethinking Reproductive ‘Tourism’ as Reproductive ‘Exile,’” Fertility & Sterility, 94 (3): 904–6.Google Scholar
Inlender, Talia, 2009. “Status Quo or Sixth Ground? Adjudicating Gender Asylum Claims” in Benhabib, Seyla and Resnik, Judith (Eds.), Migrations and Mobilities: Citizenship, Borders and Gender (New York University Press), pp. 356–79.Google Scholar
Ippolito, Francesca, 2015. “(De)Constructing Children’s Vulnerability under European Law” in Francesca, Ippolito and Sara, Iglesias Sánchez (Eds.), Protecting Vulnerable Groups: The European Human Rights Framework (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing), pp. 23–47.Google Scholar
Isin, Engin F. and Turner, Bryan S., 2007. “Investigating Citizenship: An Agenda for Citizenship Studies,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, Samir, 2014. “The Negative Effects of Ill-Advised Legislation: The Curious Case of the Evolution of Anti-Sharia Law Legislation into Anti-Foreign Law Legislation and the Impact on the CISG,” Howard Law Journal, 57: 979–1031.Google Scholar
Jabareen, Hassan, 2008. “The Rise of Transnational Lawyering for Human Rights,” Ma’asei Mishpat, 1: 137–51. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Jamieson, Lynn, 2011.“Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism?” Sociological Research Online, 16(4), available at: https://core.ac.uk/display/6496696.Google Scholar
Jang, Juyoung, Deenanath, Veronica, and Solheim, Catherine A., 2015. “Family Members’ Transnational Migration, Community Contexts, and Psychological Distress in Mexican Families,” Family Science Review, 20(2): 94–112.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, de Boer Christina G., 2009. “Parental Relocation, Free Movement Rights and Joint Parenting” in Boele-Woelki, Katharina (Ed.), Debates in Family Law around the Globe at the Dawn of the 21st Century (Antwerp: Intersentia), pp. 107–20.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kay, 2002. “Politics of International and Domestic Adoption in China,” Law & Society Review, 36(2): 379–96.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian, 2007. “Transformation of Citizenship: Status, Rights, Identity,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 37–48.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Yehiel, 2005. “Solving the Distress of Women who are Refused a Get through Punitive Alimony,” Hamishpat, 10: 381–448. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Karandikar, Sharvari, Gezinski, Lindsay B., Carter, James R., and Kaloga, Marissa, 2014. “Economic Necessity or Noble Cause? A Qualitative Study Exploring Motivations for Gestational Surrogacy in Gujarat, India,” Journal of Women and Social Work, 29(2): 224–36.Google Scholar
Karl, Ute and Torres, Sandra (Eds.), 2016. Ageing in Contexts of Migration (Oxon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Karner, Tracy X., 1998. “Professional Caring: Homecare Workers as Fictive Kin,” Journal of Aging Studies, 12(1): 69–82.Google Scholar
Katz, Ruth, Lowenstein, Ariela, and Brick, Yitzhak, 2010. “Intergenerational Relations and Old-Age in the Modern Era: Cross-Country Comparisons” in Brick, Yitzhak and Lowenstein, Ariela (Eds.), The Elderly and the Family: Multi-Generational Aspects of Aging (Jerusalem: Eshel). pp. 53–71. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Katz, Stanford N., Eekelaar, John, and Maclean, Mavis (Eds.), 2000. Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the United States and England (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kearney, M., 1995. “The Local and the Global: The Anthropology of Globalization and Transnationalism,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 24: 547–65.Google Scholar
Kelly, Joan B. and Emery, Robert E., 2003. “Children’s Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspectives,” Family Relations, 52(4): 352–62.Google Scholar
Kemp, Adriana, 2007. “Managing Migration, Reprioritizing National Citizenship: Undocumented Migrant Workers’ Children and Policy Reforms in Israel,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 663–91.Google Scholar
Kenichi, Ohmae, 1990. The Borderless World (New York: Harper Business).Google Scholar
Kesby, Alison, 2012. The Right to Have Rights: Citizenship, Humanity, and International Law (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Khamasi, Jennifer Wanjiku, 2015. “Transcending Female Circumcision: A Call for Collective Unmasking” in Longman, Chia and Bradley, Tamsin (Eds.), Interrogating Harmful Cultural Practices: Gender, Culture and Coercion (London: Routledge), pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
Khan, Almas, 2006. “The Interaction between Shariah and International Law in Arbitration,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 6(2): 791–802.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaeeun, 2011. “Establishing Identity: Documents, Performance, and Biometric Information in Immigration Proceedings,” Law & Social Inquiry, 36(3): 760–86.Google Scholar
Kojima, Yu, 2001. “In the Business of Cultural Reproduction: Theoretical Implications of the Mail-Order Bride Phenomenon,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(2): 199–210.Google Scholar
Kourlis, Rebecca Love, Taylor, Melinda, Schepard, Andrew, and Pruett, Marsha Kline, 2013. “Iaals’ Honoring Families Initiative: Courts and Communities Helping Families in Transition Arising from Separation or Divorce,” Family Court Review, 51(3): 351–76.Google Scholar
Kricheli-Katz, Tamar, 2012. “Choice, Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty,” Law & Society Review, 46(3): 557–87.Google Scholar
Kritzman-Amir, Tali, 2015. “Iterations of the Family: Parents, Children and Mixed-Status Families,” Minnesota Journal of International Law, 24(2): 245–311.Google Scholar
Kroløkke, Charlotte, 2009. “Click a Donor,” Journal of Consumer Culture, 9(1): 7–30.Google Scholar
Kron, Stefanie, 2011. “The Border as Method: Towards an Analysis of Political Subjectivities in Transmigrant Spaces” in Wastl-Walter, Dorit (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies (Surrey: Ashgate), pp. 103–20.Google Scholar
Kubitschek, Carolyn A., 2014. “Failure of the Hague Abduction Convention to Address Domestic Violence and Its Consequences” in Rains, Robert E. (Ed.), The 1980 Hague Abduction Convention, Comparative Aspects (London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing), pp. 132–53.Google Scholar
Kunz, Rahel, 2016. “‘Moneymaker and Mother from Afar’: The Power of Gender Myths” in van Naerssen, Ton, Smith, Lothar, Davids, Tine and Marchand, Marianne H. (Eds.), Women, Gender, Remittances and Development in the Global South (London: Routledge), pp. 207–28.Google Scholar
Kutty, Faisal, 2010. “The Myth and Reality of Shari’a Courts in Canada: A Delayed Opportunity for the Indigenization of Islamic Legal Rulings,” University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 7(3): 559–602.Google Scholar
Theodora, Lam, Yeoh, Brenda S. A., and Anh, Hoang Lan, 2013. “Transnational Migration and Changing Care Arrangements for Left-Behind Children in Southeast Asia: A Selective Literature Review in Relation to the CHAMPSEA Study,” Working Paper Series No. 207, Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle and Virág, Molnár, 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences,” Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167–95.Google Scholar
Landes, Elisabeth M. and Posner, Richard A., 1978. “The Economics of the Baby Shortage,” Journal of Legal Studies, 7(2): 323–48.Google Scholar
Lansdown, Gerison, 2010. “The Realisation of Children’s Participation Rights: Critical Reflections” in Percy-Smith, Bary and Thomas, Nigel (Eds.), A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation: Perspectives from Theory and Practice (London: Routledge), pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
Lapidoth, Ruth and Friesel, Ofra, 2010. “Some Reflections on Israel’s Temporary Legislation on Unification of Families,” Israel Law Review, 43(2): 457–567.Google Scholar
Lechner, Frank J. and Boli, John (Eds.), 2012. The Globalization Reader, 4th edn. (Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
Leckey, Robert, 2008. Contextual Subjects: Family, State, and Relational Theory (University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Lee, Catherine, 2015. “Family Reunification and the Limits of Immigration Reform: Impact and Legacy of the 1965 Immigration Act,” Sociological Forum, 30(S1): 528–48.Google Scholar
Lee, Donna R., 1998. “Mail Fantasy: Global Sexual Exploitation in the Mail-Order Bride Industry and Proposed Legal Solutions,” Asian American Law Journal, 5: 139–79.Google Scholar
Lee, Hye-Kyung, 2013. “Marriage Migration” in Immanuel, Ness (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm353/abstract.Google Scholar
Leinonen, Johanna and Pellander, Saara, 2014. “Court Decisions over Marriage Migration in Finland: A Problem with Transnational Family Ties,” Journal of Ethics and Migration Studies, 40(9): 1488–506.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian, 1999. “Positivism, Formalism, Realism,” Columbia Law Review, 99: 1138–64.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, 1955. “The Structural Study of Myth,” The Journal of American Folklore, 68(270): 428–44.Google Scholar
Levin, Irene, 2004. “Living Apart Together: A New Family Form,” Current Sociology, 52(2): 223–40.Google Scholar
Levine, James A., 2011. “Poverty and Obesity in the U.S.,” Diabetes, 60: 2667–8.Google Scholar
Liebel, Manfred, 2015. “Protecting the Rights of Working Children Instead of Banning Child Labour: Bolivia Tries a New Legislative Approach,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23(3): 529–47.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Lindsay, 2010. “Protecting Pageant Princesses: A Call for Statutory Regulation of Child Beauty Pageants,” Journal of Law and Policy, 18(2): 739–74.Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Shahar, 2012. “The Liberal Transformation of Spousal Law: Past, Present, and Future,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1):15–75.Google Scholar
Lifshitz, Shahar, 2005. Cohabitation Law in Israel: In Light of a Civil Law Theory of the Family (Haifa University Press). [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Lillie, Nathan, 2016. “The Right Not to Have Rights: Posted Worker Acquiescence and the European Union Labor Rights Framework,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 17(1): 39–62.Google Scholar
Lindhorst, Taryn and Edleson, Jeffrey L., 2012. Battered Women, Their Children, And International Law: The Unintended Consequences of the Hague Child Abduction Convention (Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press).Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth, 2007. “Inclusive Citizenship: Realizing the Potential,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 49–61.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Kathryn A., 2000. “Wives for Sale: The Modern International Mail Order Bride Industry,” Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 20(2): 341–67.Google Scholar
Longman, Chia and Bradley, Tamsin (Eds.), 2015. Interrogating Harmful Cultural Practices: Gender, Culture and Coercion (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
López, Jane Lilly, 2015. ““Impossible Families”: Mixed-Citizenship Status Couples and the Law,” Law & Policy, 37(1–2): 93–118.Google Scholar
Lowe, Nigel V. and Stephens, Victoria, 2012. “Global Trends in the Operation of the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention,” Family Law Quarterly, 46(1): 41–85.Google Scholar
Lowell, Lindsay B., Martin, Susan, and Stone, Robyn, 2010. “Ageing and Care Giving in the United States: Policy Contexts and the Immigrant Workforce,” Population Ageing, 3(1): 59–82.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Ariela and Katz, Ruth. 2010. “Taking Care of the Elderly – What is the Desirable Balance between the Family and the State?” in Brick, Yitzhak and Lowenstein, Ariela (Eds.), The Elderly and the Family: Multi-Generational Aspects of Aging (Jerusalem: Eshel), pp. 40–51. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Maccoby, Eleanor E. and Mnookin, Robert H., 1992. Dividing the Child: Social and Legal Dilemmas of Custody (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Macfarlane, Julia, 2012. Islamic Divorce in North America: A Shari’a Path in a Secular Society (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
MacIntosh, Constance, 2010. “Domestic Violence and Gender Based Persecution: How Refugee Adjudicators Judge Women Seeking Refuge from Spousal Violence-and Why Reform is Needed,” Refuge, 26(2): 147–64.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Jennifer, Bruce, Smyth, Margaret, Kelaher, Yvonne, Wells, and Caroline, Long, 2010. “Post-Separation Parenting Arrangements: Patterns and Developmental Outcomes for Infants and Children,” collected reports prepared for the Australian Government Attorney General’s Department available at: www.ag.gov.au/FamiliesAndMarriage/Families/FamilyViolence/Documents/Post%20separation%20parenting%20arrangements%20and%20developmental%20outcomes%20for%20infants%20and%20children.pdf.Google Scholar
Macklin, Audrey, 2007. “Who is the Citizen’s Other? Considering the Heft of citizenship,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 333–66.Google Scholar
Maclean, Mavis and Eekelaar, John, 2014. “Institutional Mechanisms: Courts, Lawyers and Others” in Eekelaar, John and George, Rob (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Family Law and Policy (Abingdon: Routledge Handbooks), pp. 372–80.Google Scholar
MacMaster, Neil, 2007. “The Colonial “Emancipation” of Algerian Women: the Marriage Law of 1959 and the Failure of Legislation on Women’s Rights in the Post-Independence Era,” Vienna Journal of African Studies, 12: 91–116.Google Scholar
Mahar, Heather, 2003. “Why Are There so Few Prenuptial Agreements?,” Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series, Paper 436, available at: www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/436.pdf.Google Scholar
Mahler, Sarah J., 2001. “Transnational Relationships: The Struggle to Communicate across Borders,” Identities, 7(4) 583–619.Google Scholar
Mahr, Jessie M., 2008. “Protecting Our Vulnerable Citizens: Birthright Citizenship and the Call for Recognition of Constructed Deportation,” Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 32(3): 723–47.Google Scholar
Malhotra, Anil and Malhotra, Ranjit, 2012. “All Aboard for the Fertility Express,” Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 38(1): 31–41.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw, 1939. “The Group and the Individual in Functional Analysis,” American Journal of Sociology, 44(6): 938–64.Google Scholar
Merin, Yuval, 2005. “The Right to Family Life and Civil Marriage under International Law and its Implementation in the State of Israel,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 28(1): 79–147.Google Scholar
Marsden, Jessica, 2014. “Domestic Violence Asylum After Matter of L-R,” The Yale Law Journal, 123(7): 2512–57.Google Scholar
Marson, Alison A., 1997. “Planning for Love: The Politics of Prenuptial Agreements,” Stanford Law Review, 49: 887–916.Google Scholar
Martin, Susan Ehrlich and Jurik, Nancy C., 2007. Doing Justice, Doing Gender: Women in Legal and Criminal Justice Occupations, 2nd edn. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, Maya N., Flaxman, Seth R., Boerma, Ties, Vanderpoel, Sheryl, and Stevens, Gretchen A., 2012. “National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys”, Plos Medicine, 9(12): e1001356, available at: www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001356#s3.Google Scholar
Mauro, Guillén F., 2001. “Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature,” Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 235–60.Google Scholar
Mautner, Menachem, 2011. “Three Approaches to Law and Culture,” Cornell Law Review, 96(4): 839–68.Google Scholar
Mavunga, R.A., 2013. “A Critical Assessment of the Minimum Age Convention 138 of 1973 and The Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention 182 of 1999,” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(5): 121–68, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2427729.Google Scholar
Mayers, William E., 2001. “The Right Rights? Child Labor in a Globalizing World,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 575: 38–55.Google Scholar
Mazuz, Keren, 2013. “The Familial Dyad between Aged Patients and Filipina Caregivers in Israel: Eldercare and Bodily-Based Practices in the Jewish Home,” Anthropology & Aging Quarterly, 34(3): 126–34.Google Scholar
Mazuz, Keren, 2013. “The State of the Jewish Family: Eldercare as a Practice of Corporeal Symbiosis by Filipina Migrant Workers” in Markowitz, Fran (Ed.), Ethnographic Encounters in Israel: Poetics and Ethics of Fieldwork (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press),pp. 97–111.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Valentina, 2013. “Transnational Families, Research and Scholarship” in Immanuel, Ness (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration,available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm541/pdf.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Valentina, Schans, Djamila, Caarls, Kim and Beauchemin, Cris, 2015. “Transnational Families between Africa and Europe,” International Migration Review, 49(1): 142–72.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Valentina and Djamila, Schans, 2011. “Transnational Families and the Well‐Being of Children: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4): 704–12.Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C., 2012. “Marriage Pluralism in the United States: On Civil and Religious Jurisdiction and the Demands of Equal Citizenship” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 309–40.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Julia Halloran, 2007. “Premarital Agreements and Choice of Law: ‘One, Two, Three, Baby, You and Me’,” Missouri Law Review, 72(3): 793–854.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Julia Halloran, 2003. “Should Marital Property Rights Be Inalienable? Preserving the Marriage Ante,” Nebraska Law Review, 82(3): 460–98.Google Scholar
McWilliams, Monica, Priyamvada, Yarnell N. R., and Churchill, Molly, 2015. “Forced Dependency and Legal Barriers: Implications of the UK’s Immigration and Social Security Policies for Minoritized Women Living in Abusive Intimate Relationships in Northern Ireland,” Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 5(6): 1536–56.Google Scholar
Meier, Patricia J. and Zhang, Xiaole, 2008. “Sold into Adoption: The Hunan Baby Trafficking Scandal Exposes Vulnerabilities in Chinese Adoptions to the United States,” Cumberland Law Review, 39(1), 87–130.Google Scholar
Meisels, Judith, 2014. “Reflections on the Centrality of Genetics in Parenting Following HCJ 566/11 Mamet v. Ministry of Interior Affairs,” Mivzakey Hearot Psika, 28: 46–56, available at: https://www.colman.ac.il/sites/default/files/28_june_2014_5_meisels.pdf. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Menjívar, Cecilia and Salcido, Olivia, 2002. “Immigrant Women and Domestic Violence, Common Experiences in Different Countries,” Gender & Society, 16(6): 898–920.Google Scholar
Menzel, Peter and D’Aluisi, Faith, 2005. Hungry World: What the World Eats (Napa, CA: Material World Books).Google Scholar
Mercurio, Bryan, 2003. “Abortion in Ireland: An Analysis of the Legal Transformation Resulting from Membership in the European Union,” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 11:141–80.Google Scholar
Meria, Laura (Ed.), 2014. Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care: Understanding Mobility and Absence in Family Life (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Merkel, Reinhard and Putzke, Holm, 2013. “After Cologne: Male Circumcision and The Law. Parental Right, Religious Liberty or Criminal Assault?” Journal of Medical Ethics, 39: 444–9.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, 2003. “Constructing a Global Law- Violence against Women and the Human Rights System,” Law & Social Inquiry, 28(4): 941–77.Google Scholar
Mezmur, Benyan Dawit, 2012. “Acting Like a Rich Bully: Madonna, Mercy, Malawi, and International Children’s Rights Law in Adoption,” International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20(1): 24–56.Google Scholar
Michie, Jonathan (Ed.), 2011. The Handbook of Globalization, 2nd edn. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko, 2013. “Global Income Inequality in Numbers: In History and Now,” Global Policy, 4(2): 198–208.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko, 2012. “Evolution of Global Inequality: From Class to Location, from Proletarians to Migrants,” Global Policy, 3(2): 125–34.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko, 2007. “Globalization and Inequity” in Held, David and Kaya, Ayse (Eds.), Global Inequality (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 26–49.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha and Shanley, Mary Lyndon, 1996. “Relational Rights and Responsibilities: Revisioning the Family in Liberal Political Theory and Law,” Hypatia, 11(1): 4–29.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. and Kornhauser, Lewis, 1979. “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” Yale Law Journal, 88: 950–96.Google Scholar
Modelski, George, Devezas, Tessaleno and William, Thompson R. (Eds.), 2008. Globalization as Evolutionary Process (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Morag, Tamar, Rivkin, Dori, and Sorek, Yoa, 2012. “Child Participation in the Family Courts – Lessons from the Israeli Pilot Project,” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 26(1):1–30.Google Scholar
Morgan, David H. J., 2011. Rethinking Family Practices (Basingstoke: Palgrave).Google Scholar
Morgan, David H. J., 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Morris, Brian J. and Krieger, John N., 2013. “Does Male Circumcision Affect Sexual Function, Sensitivity, or Satisfaction?- A Systematic Review,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(11): 2644–57.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, Seymour, 2002. “Adult Children and Indigent Parents: Intergenerational Responsibilities in International Perspective,” Marquette Law Review, 86(3): 401–55.Google Scholar
Mullally, Siobhan, 2011. “Domestic Violence Asylum Claims and Recent Developments in International Human Rights Law: A Progress Narrative?” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60(2): 459–84.Google Scholar
Mulongo, Peggy, McAndrew, Sue, and Martin, Caroline H., 2014. “Crossing Borders: Discussing the Evidence Relating to the Mental Health Needs of Women Exposed to Female Genital Mutilation,” International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 23(4): 296–305.Google Scholar
Mundlak, Guy, 2007. “Industrial Citizenship, Social Citizenship, Corporate Citizenship: I Just Want My Wages,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 719–48.Google Scholar
Mundlak, Guy and Shamir, Hila, 2011. “Bringing Together or Drifting Apart? Targeting Care Work as “Work Like no Other,” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 23(1): 289–308.Google Scholar
Mundlak, Guy and Shamir, Hila, 2008. “Between Intimacy and Alienage: The Legal Construction of Domestic and Care Work in the Welfare State” in Lutz, Helma (Ed.), Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme (New York: Routledge), pp. 161–76.Google Scholar
Munjal, Diksha and Munjal, Yahita, 2014. “The “Wanted” Child: Identifying the Gaps and Challenges in Commercial Surrogacy in India,” Asian Bioethics Review, 6(1): 66–82.Google Scholar
Musalo, Karen, 2007. “Protecting Victims of Gendered Persecution: Fear of Floodgates or Call to (Principled) Action?” Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 14(2): 119–43.Google Scholar
Mutcherson, Kimberly M., 2013. “Open Fertility Borders: Defending Access to Cross-Border Fertility Care in the United States” in Glenn, Cohen (Ed.), The Globalization of Health Care: Legal and Ethical Issues (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 148–63.Google Scholar
Muthumbi, Jane, Svanemyr, Joar, Scolaro, Elisa, Temmerman, Marleen, and Say, Lale, 2015. “Female Genital Mutilation: A Literature Review of the Current Status of Legislation and Policies in 27 African Countries and Yemen,” African Journal of Reproductive Health, 19(3): 32–40.Google Scholar
Myrdahl, Eileen Muller, 2010. “Legislating Love: Norwegian Family Reunification Law as a Racial Project,” Social & Cultural Geography, 11(2): 103–16.Google Scholar
Narayanan, Usha, 1996. “The Government’s Role in Fostering the Relationship between Adult Children and their Elder Parents: From Filial Responsibility Laws to ... What? A Cross-Cultural Perspective,” Elder Law Journal, 4: 369–406.Google Scholar
Neagu, Mariela, 2015. “Children by Request: Romania’s Children between Rights and International Politics,” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 29(2): 215–36.Google Scholar
Nelson Julie A., 2012. “Are Women Really More Risk-Averse than Men?” Global Development and Environment Institute, Working Paper No. 12-05, Tufts University.Newman, David, 2011. “Contemporary Research Agendas in Border Studies: An Overview” in Wastl-Walter, Dorit (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies (Surrey: Ashgate), pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
Newman, David, 2006. “The Lines that Continue to Separate Us: Borders in our ‘Borderless’ World,” Progress in Human Geography, 30(2): 143–61.Google Scholar
Newman, Jonah, 2012. “Whose Home? The Role of Jewish Identity in Israel’s Policy towards the Children of Foreign Workers,” Washington University International Review, 1: 42–54.Google Scholar
Nhenga-Chakarisa, Tendai Charity, 2010. “Who Does the Law Seek to Protect and from What? The Application of International Law on Child Labour in an African Context,” African Human Rights Law Journal, 10(1): 161–96.Google Scholar
Nichols, Joel A., 2012. “Multi-Tiered Marriage” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 11–50.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuys, Olga, 1996. “The Paradox of Child Labor and Anthropology,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 25 (1): 237–51.Google Scholar
Noguchi, Yoshie, 2010. “20 Years of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and International Action against Child Labour,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18(4): 515–34.Google Scholar
Nyers, Peter, 2007. “Introduction: Why Citizenship Studies,” Citizenship Studies, 11(1): 1–4.Google Scholar
Nygren, Karl, Adamson, David, Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando, and de Mouzon, Jacques, 2010. “Cross-Border Fertility Care – International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies Global Survey: 2006 Data and Estimates,” Fertility and Sterility, 94(1): e4–e10, available at: www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)04298-8/pdf.Google Scholar
Nwaogu, Uwaoma G. and Ryan, Michael J., 2015. “FDI, Foreign Aid, Remittance and Economic Growth in Developing Countries,” Review of Development Economics, 19(1): 100–15.Google Scholar
Obrien, John, 1999. Conflict of Laws, 2nd edn. (London: Cavendish).Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kerry, 2015. The Politics of Adoption: International Perspectives on Law, Policy and Practice, 3rd edn. (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar
Okin, Moller Susan, 1999. “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” in Joshua, Howard Matthew and Nussbaum, Martha C. (Eds.), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), pp.7–26.Google Scholar
Okin, Moller Suzan, 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Okyere, Samuel, 2013. “Are Working Children’s Rights and Child Labour Abolition Complementary or Opposing Realms?” International Social Work, 56(1): 80–91.Google Scholar
Olsen, Frances E., 1985. “The Myth of State Intervention in the Family,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 18: 835–64.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Mary, Bagheri, Parisa, and Sarnicola, Alexis, 2015. “Forgotten Children of Immigration and Family Law: How The Absence of Legal Aid Affects Children in the United States,” Family Court Review, 53(4): 676–97.Google Scholar
Ong, Debbie, 2012. “Prenuptial Agreements Affirming TQ v. TR in Singapore,” Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 24: 402–32.Google Scholar
Orgad, Liav, 2008. “Love and War: Family Migration in Time of National Emergency,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 23(1): 85–127.Google Scholar
Paasi, Anssi, 2011. “A Border Theory: An Unattainable Dream or a Realistic Aim for Border Scholars?” in Wastl-Walter, Dorit (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies (Surrey: Ashgate), pp. 11–31.Google Scholar
Palacios, Jesús, 2015. “Crisis in Intercountry Adoption, Crisis in Adoptive Families,” Family Science, 6(1): 43–9.Google Scholar
Pande, Amrita, 2010. ““At Least I Am Not Sleeping with Anyone”: Resisting the Stigma of Commercial Surrogacy in India,” Feminist Studies, 36(2): 292–312.Google Scholar
Pande, Amrita, 2010. “Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect ‘Mother-Worker’,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(4): 969–92.Google Scholar
Pande, Amrita, 2009. “‘It May Be Her Eggs but It’s My Blood’: Surrogates and Everyday Forms of Kinship in India,” Qualitative Sociology, 32(4), 379–405.Google Scholar
Pande, Amrita, 2009. “Not an ‘Angel’,” Not a ‘Whore’: Surrogates as ‘Dirty’ Workers in India,” Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 16(2): 141–73.Google Scholar
Panitch, Vida, 2013. “Global Surrogacy: Exploitation to Empowerment,” Journal of Global Ethics, 9(3): 329–43.Google Scholar
Panitch, Vida, 2013. “Surrogate Tourism and Reproductive Rights,” Hypatia, 28(2): 274–89.Google Scholar
Parness, Jeffrey A., 2014. “Parentage Prenups and Midnups,” Georgia State University Law Review, 31(2): 343–76.Google Scholar
Parreñas, Salazar Rhacel, 2005. Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes (CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Parreñas, Salazar Rhacel, 2004. “The Care Crisis in the Philippines: Children and Transnational Families in the New Global Economy” in Ehrenreich, Barbara and Hochschild, Arlie Russell (Eds.), Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy (New York: Henry Holt and Company), pp. 39–54.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, 1964. Social Structure and Personality (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
Pearson, Jessica, 2000. “A Forum for Every Fuss: The Growth of Court Services and ADR Treatment for Family Law Cases in the United States” in Katz, Stanford N., Eekelaar, John and Maclean, Mavis (Eds.), Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the US and England (Oxford University Press), pp. 513–31.Google Scholar
Pearson, Katherine C., 2013. “Filial Support Laws in the Modern Era: Domestic and International Comparison of Enforcement Practices for Laws Requiring Adult Children to Support Indigent Parents,” Elder Law Journal, 20: 269–314.Google Scholar
Peled, Yoav, 2007. “Citizenship Betrayed: Israel’s Emerging Immigration and Citizenship Regime,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 603–28.Google Scholar
Peterson, Richard R., 1996. “A Re-Evaluation of the Economic Consequences of Divorce,” American Sociological Review, 61(3): 528–36.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne and Dustin, Moira, 2004. “UK Initiatives on Forced Marriage: Regulation, Dialogue and Exit,” Political Studies, 52: 531–51.Google Scholar
Plummer, Ken, 2003. Intimate Citizenship, Private Decision and Public Dialogue (Seattle: University of Washington Press).Google Scholar
Polikoff, Nancy, 2008. Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage, Valuing All Families under the Law (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Quillen, Brian, 2014. “The New Face of International Child Abduction: Domestic-Violence Victims and Their Treatment Under the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,” Texas International Law Journal, 49(3): 621–43.Google Scholar
Rabin, Nina, 2013. “At the Border between Public and Private: U.S. Immigration Policy for Victims of Domestic Violence,” Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 7(1): 109–53.Google Scholar
Rafiq, Aayesha, 2014. “Child Custody in Classical Islamic Law and Laws of Contemporary Muslim World (An Analysis),” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(5): 267–77.Google Scholar
Rains, Robert E., 2011. “A Prenup for Prince William and Kate? England Inches Toward Twentieth Century Law of Antenuptial Agreements: How Shall It Enter the Twenty-First?” Florida Journal of International Law, 23: 447–80.Google Scholar
Raiti, Gerard C., 2007. “Mobile Intimacy: Theories on the Economics of Emotion with Examples from Asia,” Journal of Media and Culture, 10(1), available at: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0703/02-raiti.php.Google Scholar
Ram, Uri, 2012. “McDonaldization” in Ritzer, George (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 342–7.Google Scholar
Randall, Melanie, 2015. “Particularized Social Groups and Categorical Imperatives in Refugee Law: State Failures to Recognize Gender and the Legal Reception of Gender Persecution Claims in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States,” Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 23(4): 529–71.Google Scholar
Larry, Ray, 2007. Globalization and Everyday Life (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Roach, Anleu Sharyn, 1992. “Women in The Legal Profession: Theory and Research,” Law Institutional Journal, 66: 193–208.Google Scholar
Roberts, Albert R. (Ed.), 2007. Battered Women and Their Families: Intervention Strategies and Treatment Programs, 3rd edn. (New York: Springer).Google Scholar
Robertson, Roland, 2012. “Globalisation or Glocalisation?” Journal of International Communication, 18(2): 191–208.Google Scholar
Rogerson, Sarah, 2013. “Lack of Detained Parents’ Access to the Family Justice System and the Unjust Severance of the Parent-Child Relationship,” Family Law Quarterly, 47(2): 141–72.Google Scholar
Rome, Sunny Harris, 2010. “Promoting Family Integrity: The Child Citizen Protection Act and Its Implications for Public Child Welfare,” Journal of Public Child Welfare, 4(3): 245–62.Google Scholar
Root, Veronica S., 2007. “Angelina and Madonna: Why all the Fuss? An Exploration of the Rights of the Child and Intercountry Adoption within African Nations,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 8(1): 323–54.Google Scholar
Ross, Allison E., 2008. “Taking Care of Our Caretakers: Using Filial Responsibility Laws to Support the Elderly beyond the Government’s Assistance,” Elder Law Journal, 16: 167–209.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Ann, 2009. Ireland Hidden Diaspora: The ‘Abortion Trial’ and the Making of a London-Irish Underground, 1980–2000 (London: IASC Publishing).Google Scholar
Rudrappa, Sharmila, 2012. “Working India’s Reproduction Assembly Line: Surrogacy and Reproduction Rights?” Western Humanities Review, 66(3): 77–101.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, 2014. “Global Governance and ““New Governance Theory”“: Lessons from Business and Human Rights,” Global Governance, 20: 5–17.Google Scholar
Sabar, Galia, 2012. “African Migrant Workers in Israel: Between Extended Family, Money and a Sense of Evil” in Toledano, Ehud R. (Ed.), African Communities in Asia and the Mediterranean: Between Integration and Conflict (London: Africa World Press), pp. 255–84.Google Scholar
Salami, Bukola, Duggleby, Wendy, and Rajani, Fahreen, 2016. “The Perspectives of Employers/ Families and Care Recipients of Migrant Live – In Caregivers: A Scoping Review,” Health and Social Care in the Community, 1–12, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hsc.12330/epdf.Google Scholar
Samonova, Elena, 2014. “Socioeconomic Impacts of Child Labour,” Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Sciences, 2(1): 50–4.Google Scholar
Sănduleasa, Bertha and Matei, Aniela, 2015. “Effects of Parental Migration on Families and Children in Post-Communist Romania,” Revista de Stiinte Politice, 46: 196–207.Google Scholar
Sanger, Carol, 2006. “A Case for Civil Marriage,” Cardozo Law Review, 27: 1311–23.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Silbey, Susan S., 1998. “The Pull of the Audience,” Law & Policy, 10(2–3): 97–166.Google Scholar
Saravanan, Sheela, 2013. “An Ethnomethodological Approach to Examine Exploitation in the Context of Capacity, Trust and Experience of Commercial Surrogacy in India,” Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 8(10), available at: http://peh-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1747-5341-8-10.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia, 2007. A Sociology of Globalization (New York: W. W. Norton).Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia, 2003. “Globalization or Denationalization?” Review of International Political Economy, 10(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia, 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Schiff, Berman Paul, 2012. Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Schiratzki, Johanna, 2011. “Banning God’s Law in the Name of the Holy Body – The Nordic Position on Ritual Male Circumcision,” The Family in Law, 5: 35–53.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Garbi, 2014. “Troubled by Law: The Subjectivizing Effects of Danish Marriage Reunification Laws,” International Migration, 52(3): 129–43.Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan Aart, 2005. Globalization: A Critical Introduction, 2nd edn. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Schuerkens, Ulrike, 2010. “Theoretical and Empirical Introduction: Globalization and Transformation of Social Inequality” in Schuerkens, Ulrike (Ed.), Globalization and Transformation of Social Inequality (New York: Routledge), pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Schueths, April M., 2012. “‘Where are My Rights?’ Compromised Citizenship in Mixed-Status Marriage: A Research Note,” Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 39(4): 97–109.Google Scholar
Schueths, April and Lawston, Jodie (Eds.), 2015. Living Together Living Apart: Mixed Status Families and US Immigration Policy (Seattle: University of Washington Press).Google Scholar
Schuz, Rhona, 2015. “The Dangers of Children’s Rights’ Discourse in the Political Arena: The Issue of Religious Male Circumcision as a Test Case,” Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 21: 347–91.Google Scholar
Schuz, Rhona, 2013. The Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Critical Analysis, Studies in Private International Law (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
Schuz, Rhona, 1997. A Modern Approach to the Incidental Question (Netherlands: Springer).Google Scholar
Schuz, Rhona, 1996. “Divorce and Ethnic Minorities” in Michael, Freeman (Ed.), Divorce: Where Next? (Aldershot: Dartmouth), pp. 131–57.Google Scholar
Schwiter, Karin, Berndt, Christian, and Truong, Jasmine, 2015. “Neoliberal Austerity and the Marketization of Elderly Care,” Social & Cultural Geography, 1–21, available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14649365.2015.1059473.Google Scholar
Sear, Rebecca, Lawson, David W., Kaplan, Hillard, and Shenk, Mary K., 2016. “Understanding Variation in Human Fertility: What Can We Learn from Evolutionary Demography?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371: 20150144, available at: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/371/1692/20150144.full.pdf.Google Scholar
Selby, Jessica, 2008. “Ending Abusive and Exploitative Child Labour Through International Law and Practical Action,” Australian International Law Journal, 15: 165–80.Google Scholar
Selman, Peter, 2015. “Intercountry Adoption of Children from Asia in the Twenty-First Century,” Children’s Geographies, 13(3): 312–27.Google Scholar
Selman, Peter, 2012.“The Global Decline of Intercountry Adoption: What Lies Ahead?” Social Policy & Society, 11(3): 381–97.Google Scholar
Seron, Carroll and Silbey, Susan S., 2004. “Profession, Science, and Culture: An Emergent Canon of Law and Society Research” in Sarat, Austin (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (Victoria, Australia: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 30–59.Google Scholar
Serour, G. I., 2013. “Medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting,” African Journal of Urology, 19: 145–49.Google Scholar
Sethna, Christabelle and Doull, Marion, 2012. “Accidental Tourism: Canadian Women, Abortion Tourism, and Travel,” Women’s Studies, 41: 457–75.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, 2013. “Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law” in Fishbayn, Joffe Lisa and Neil, Sylvia (Eds.), Gender, Religion & Family Law: Theorizing Conflicts between Women’s Rights and Cultural Traditions (Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press), pp. 38–75.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, 2009. The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, 2007. “The Worth of Citizenship in an Unequal World,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2): 367–88.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, 2001. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights (UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Shahar, Ido, 2015. Legal Pluralism in the Holy City: Competing Courts, Forum Shopping, and Institutional Dynamics in Jerusalem (Surrey: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Shakargy, Sharon, 2013. “Israel” in Trimmings, Katarina and Beaumont, Paul (Eds.), International Surrogacy Arrangements (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing), pp. 231–46.Google Scholar
Shakargy, Sharon, 2013. “Marriage by the State or Married to the State: Choice of Law in Marriage and Divorce,” Journal of Private International Law, 9(3): 499–533.Google Scholar
Shamir, Hila, 2013. “Migrant Care Workers in Israel: Between Family, Market, and State,” Israel Studies Review, 28(2): 192–209.Google Scholar
Shamir, Hila and Mundlak, Guy, 2013. “Spheres of Migration: Political, Economic and Universal Imperatives in Israel’s Migration Regime,” Middle East Law and Governance, 5(1–2): 112–72.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon, 2004. Just Marriage (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Shaw, Katerina, 2009. “Barriers to Freedom: Continued Failure of U.S. Immigration Laws to Offer Equal Protection to Immigrant Battered Women,” Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender, 15: 663–89.Google Scholar
Sheleff, Leon, 1981. Generations Apart: Adult Hostility to Youth (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Shenfield, Françoise, De Mouzon, Jacques, Pennings, Guido, Ferraretti, Anna Pia, Anders, Nyboe Andersen, De Wert, Guido, Veerle, Goossens, and the ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care, 2010 “Cross-Border Reproductive Care in Six European Countries,” Human Reproduction, 25(6): 1361–68.Google Scholar
Shetty, Sudha and Edleson, Jeffery L., 2005. “Adult Domestic Violence in Cases of International Parental Child Abduction,” Violence Against Women, 11(1): 115–38.Google Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas, 2005. “On the New Family: Introductory Notes,” Tel Aviv Law Review, 28(3): 643–70. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Shirpak, Khosro Refaie, Maticka-Tyndale, Eleanor, and Chinichian, Maryam, 2007. “Iranian Immigrants’ Perceptions of Sexuality in Canada: A Symbolic Interactionist Approach,” The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 16(3–4): 113–28.Google Scholar
Shmueli, Benjamin and Schuz, Rhona, 2012. “Between Tort Law, Contract Law, and Child Law: How to Compensate the Left-Behind Parent in International Child Abduction Cases,” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 23(1): 65–131.Google Scholar
Shultz, Marjorie Maguire, 1982. “Contractual Ordering of Marriage: A New Model for State Policy,” California Law Review, 70(2): 204–334.Google Scholar
Siddiqi Faraaz and Harry Anthony Patrinos, 1995. “Child Labor: Issues, Causes and Interventions,” Human Capital Development and Operations Policy, Working Paper No. 56.Sifris, Ronli, 2014. Reproductive Freedom, Torture and International Human Rights (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Silverstein, Merril, Gans, Daphna and Yang, Frances M., 2009. “Intergenerational Support to Aging Parents: The Role of Norms and Needs,” Journal of Family Issues, 27(8): 1068–84.Google Scholar
Simonazzi, Annamaria, 2009. “Care Regimes and National Employment Models,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2): 211–3.Google Scholar
Sims, Roxanne, 2009. “A Comparison of Law in the Philippines, the U.S.A., Taiwan, and Belarus to Regulate the Mail Bride Industry,” Akron Law Review, 42(2): 607–37.Google Scholar
Simms, Shelley, 1993. “What’s Culture Got to do with It? Excising the Harmful Tradition of Female Circumcision,” Harvard Law Review, 106(8): 1944–61.Google Scholar
Singer, Anna, 2009. “‘Active Parenting or Solomon’s Justice?’ Alternative Residence in Sweden for Children with Separated Parents” in Katharina, Boele-Woelki (Ed.), Debates in Family Law around the Globe at the Dawn of the 21st Century (Antwerp: Intersentia), pp. 55–81.Google Scholar
Sirman, Nükhet, 2005. “The Making of Familial Citizenship in Turkey” in Keyman, Emin Fuat and İçduygu, Ahmet (Eds.), Citizenship in a Global World: European Questions and Turkish Experiences (London: Routledge), pp. 147–72.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol and Sevenhuijsen, Selma (Eds.), 1989. Child Custody and the Politics of Gender (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Smearman, Claire A., 2009. “Second Wives’ Club: Mapping the Impact of Polygamy in U.S. Immigration Law,” Berkeley Journal of International Law, 27(2): 382–447.Google Scholar
Smerdon, Usha Rengachary, 2013. “India” in Trimmings, Katarina and Beaumont, Paul (Eds.), International Surrogacy Arrangements (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing), pp. 187–217.Google Scholar
Smolin, David M., 2010. “Child Laundering and the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption: The Future and Past of Intercountry Adoption,” University of Louisville Law Review, 48(3): 441–98.Google Scholar
Smolin, David M., 2007. “Child Laundering as Exploitation: Applying Anti-Trafficking Norms to Intercountry Adoption under the Coming Hague Regime,” Vermont Law Review, 32: 1–55.Google Scholar
Smolin, David M., 2006. “Child Laundering: How the Intercountry Adoption System Legitimizes and Incentivizes the Practices of Buying, Trafficking, Kidnapping, and Stealing Children,” Wayne Law Review, 52(1): 113–200.Google Scholar
Smolin, David M., 2005. “The Two Faces of Intercountry Adoption: The Significance of the Indian Adoption Scandals,” Seton Hall Law Review, 35(2): 403–93.Google Scholar
Smolin, David M., 2000. “Strategic Choices in the International Campaign against Child Labor,” Human Rights Quarterly, 22(4): 942–88.Google Scholar
Snow, Robert L., 2008. Child Abduction: Prevention, Investigating and Recovery (Westport, CT: Praeger).Google Scholar
Sooryamoorthy, Radhamany, 2015. “Introduction to the Special Issue,” Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 46(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
Sorokan, Todd S., Finlay, Jane C. and Jefferies, Ann L., 2015. “Newborn Male Circumcision,” Paediatrics & Child Health, 20(6): 311–5.Google Scholar
Spatz, Melissa, 1991. “A “Lesser” Crime: A Comparative Study of Legal Defenses for Men Who Kill Their Wives,” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 24(4): 597–639.Google Scholar
Sperling, Daniel, forthcoming. Suicide Tourism: Understanding the Legal, Philosophical and Socio-Political Dimensions (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara, 2006. “When Globalization Hits Home: International Family Law Comes of Age,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 39(5): 1551–604.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara, 2005. International Family Law: An Introduction (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Staver, Anne, 2013. “Free Movement and the Fragmentation of Family Reunification Rights,” European Journal of Migration and the Law, 15(1): 69–89.Google Scholar
Storrow, Richard F., 2013. “The Proportionality Problem in Cross-Border Reproduction Care” in Glenn, Cohen (Ed.), The Globalization of Health Care: Legal and Ethical Issues (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 125–47.Google Scholar
Storrow, Richard F., 2011. “Assisted Reproduction on Treacherous Terrain: The Legal Hazard of Cross-Border Reproductive Travel,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23(5): 538–45, available at: http://www.rbmojournal.com/article/S1472-6483(11)00412-3/fulltext.Google Scholar
Storrow, Richard F., 2010. “The Pluralism Problem in Cross-Border Reproductive Care,” Human Reproduction, 25(12): 2939–43.Google Scholar
Storrow, Richard F., 2005–2006. “Quest for Conception: Fertility Tourism, Globalization and Feminist Legal Theory,” Hastings Law Journal, 57: 295–330.Google Scholar
Strasser, Mark, 2014. “Family, Same-Sex Unions and the Law” in Eekelaar, John and George, Rob (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Family Law and Policy (Abingdon: Routledge Handbooks), pp. 45–60.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn, 2005. Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Stuifbergen, Maria C. and van Delden, Johannes J. M., 2011. “Filial Obligations to Elderly Parents: A Duty to Care,” Medicine, Health Care Philosophy, 14(1): 63–71.Google Scholar
Swatek-Evenstein, Mark, 2013. “Limits of Enlightenment and the Law – On the Legality of Ritual Male Circumcision in Europe Today,” Merkourios, 29(77): 42–50.Google Scholar
Swyngedouw, Erik, 2004. “Globalisation of ‘Glocalisation’? Networks, Territories, and Rescaling,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1): 25–48.Google Scholar
Tagari, Hadas, 2012. “Personal Family Law Systems – A Comparative and International Human Rights Analysis,” International Journal of Law in Context, 8(2): 231–52.Google Scholar
Thai, Hung Cam, 2014. Insufficient Funds: The Culture of Money in Low-Wage Transnational Families (Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Thomas, Philip A., 1997. “Socio-Legal Studies: The Case of Disappearing Fleas and Bustards” in Thomas, Philip A. (Ed.), Socio-Legal Studies (Aldershot: Dartmouth), pp 1–22.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel, 2008. “Respect for Private and Family Life Under Article 8 ECHR in Immigration Cases: A Human Right to Regularize Illegal Stay?” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(1): 87–112.Google Scholar
Sherif, Trask Bahira, 2010. Globalization and Families: Accelerated Systemic Social Change (New York: Springer).Google Scholar
Treas, Judith, 2008. “Transnational Older Adults and Their Families,” Family Relations, 57(4): 468–78.Google Scholar
Treviño, Javier, 2001. “The Sociology of Law in Global Perspective,” The American Sociologist, 32(5): 5–9.Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi, 2016. “On the Regulation of Fertility Services in Israel” in Blank, Yishai, Levi-Faur, David, and Kreitner, Roy (Eds.), Regulation: Law and Policy (Tel Aviv University), pp. 269–309. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi, 2015. “A Different Journey: Experiences of Israeli Surrogacy Parents in India,” Theory and Criticism, 44: 177–202. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi, 2012. “Introducing the Political Family: A New Road Map for Critical Family Law,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13(1): 361–84.Google Scholar
Trimmings, Katarina and Beaumont, Paul, “General Report on Surrogacy” in Katarina, Trimmings and Paul, Beaumont (Eds.), International Surrogacy Arrangements (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 2013), pp. 439–549.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., 1990. “Back to the Future: The Short, Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement,” Florida State University Law Review, 18: 1–55.Google Scholar
Tsong, Yuying and Yuli, Liu, 2008. “Parachute Kids and Astronaut Families” in Tewari, Nita and Alvarez, Alvin N. (Eds.), Asian American Psychology: Current Perspectives (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 365–79.Google Scholar
Unnithan, Maya, 2013. “Thinking through Surrogacy Legislation in India: Reflections on Relational Consent and the Rights of Infertile Women,” Journal of Legal Anthropology, 1(3): 287–313.Google Scholar
Urbanek, Doris, 2012. “Forced Marriage vs. Family Reunification: Nationality, Gender and Ethnicity in German Migration Policy,” Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(3): 333–45.Google Scholar
Urry, John and Larsen, Jonas, 2011. The Tourist Gaze 3.0 (Los Angeles: Sage).Google Scholar
van Der Geest, Sjaak, Mul, Anke, and Vermeulen, Hans, 2004. “Linkages between Migration and the Care of Frail Older People: Observations from Greece, Ghana and the Netherlands,” Ageing & Society, 24(3): 431–50.Google Scholar
van Houtum, Henk, 2012. “Remapping Borders” in Wilson Thomas M. and Donnan Hastings (Eds.), A Companion to Border Studies (Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell), pp. 405–18.Google Scholar
Van Rossem, Ronan, Meekers, Dominique, and Gage, Anastasia J., 2015. “Women’s Position and Attitudes towards Female Genital Mutilation in Egypt: A Secondary Analysis of the Egypt Demographic and Health Surveys, 1995–2014,” BMC Public Health 15: 874–87.Google Scholar
van Walsum, Sarah K., 2009. “Transnational Mothering, National Immigration Policy, and European Law: The Experience of the Netherlands” in Benhabib, Seyla and Resnik, Judith (Eds.), Migration and Mobilities: Citizenship, Borders and Gender (New York University Press), pp. 228–51.Google Scholar
Vanderplatt, Madine, Ramos, Howard, and Yoshida, Yoko, 2012. “What Do Sponsored Parents and Grandparents Contribute?” Canadian Ethnic Studies, 44(3): 79–96.Google Scholar
Vink, Maarten Peter, Prokic-Breuer, Tijana, and Dronkers, Jaap, 2013. “Immigrant Naturalization in the Context of Institutional Diversity: Policy Matters, but to Whom?” International Migration, 51(5): 1–20.Google Scholar
Vitikainen, Annamari, 2013. Limits of Liberal Multiculturalism (Helsinki: Theoretical Philosophy).Google Scholar
von Britenshtain, Tina, 1999. “The Filipino Workers in Israel” in Nathanson, Roby and Achdut, Lea (Eds.), The New Workers: Wage Earners from Foreign Countries in Israel (Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad), pp. 205–25. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Wade, Lisa, 2011. “Learning from “Female Genital Mutilation”: Lessons from 30 Years of Academic Discourse,” Ethnicities, 12(1): 26–49.Google Scholar
Wallace, Harvey and Roberson, Cliff, 2016. Family Violence: Legal, Medical and Social Perspectives, 7th edn. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Walsh, Kieran and Shutes, Isabel, 2013. “Care Relationships, Quality of Care and Migrant Workers Caring for Older People,” Ageing & Society, 33(3): 393–420.Google Scholar
Wang, H. and Zhai, F., 2013. “Programme and Policy Options for Preventing Obesity in China,” Obesity Reviews, 14:134–40.Google Scholar
Wang, Lee Ann, 2013. “‘Of the Law, but Not Its Spirit’: Immigration Marriage Fraud as Legal Fiction and Violence against Asian Immigrant Women,” UC Irvine Law Review, 3(4): 1221–50.Google Scholar
Wasserstein, Fassberg Celia, 2013. Private International Law (Jerusalem: Nevo), vol. I. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Wastl-Walter, Dorit (Ed.), 2011. The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies (Surrey: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Watson, James L, 2006. Golden Arches East: McDonald’s in East Asia, 2nd edn. (CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Weiner, Merle H., 2000. “International Child Abduction and the Escape from Domestic Violence,” Fordham Law Review, 69(2): 593–706.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Loraine E., 2008. “Ontario’s Sharia Law Debate: Law and Politics under the Charter” in Moon, Richard (Ed.), Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada (Vancouver: UBS Press), pp. 239–63.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Brynn, 2012. “Reproductive Choice in the Hands of the State: The Rights to Abortion under the European Convention on Human Rights in Light of A, B, & C v. Ireland,” American University International Law Review, 27: 391–437.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Jeffrey A., 1993. ““An Irish Solution to an Irish Problem”: Ireland’s Struggle with Abortion Law,” Arizona Journal International and Comparative Law, 10: 165–200.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Lenore J., 1985. The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
West, Robin, 2009. “A Reply to Pierre,” Georgetown Law Journal, 97: 865–75.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Patricia, 2004. “Eliminating FGM: The Role of the Law,” The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 11: 257–71.Google Scholar
White, Ben, 1996. “Globalization and the Child Labor Problem,” Journal of International Development, 8(6): 829–39.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Eleanor and Bell, David, 2012. “Ties that Blind: On Not Seeing (or Looking) beyond ‘The Family’,” Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(3): 423–9.Google Scholar
Williams, Joan, 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Joan C., 2010. Reshaping the Work-Family Debate: Why Men and Class Matter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Willing, Indigo, Fronek, Patricia, and Cuthbert, Denise, 2012. “Review of Sociological Literature on Intercountry Adoption,” Social Policy and Society, 11(3): 465–79.Google Scholar
Wilson, Fretwell Robin, 2012. “The Perils of Privatized Marriage” in Nichols, Joel A. (Ed.), Marriage and Divorce in a Multicultural Context: Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 253–83.Google Scholar
Wilson, Fretwell Robin, 2007. “The Overlooked Costs of Religious Difference,” Washington and Lee Law Review, 64(4), 1363–83.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas M. and Donnan, Hastings, 2012. “Borders and Border Studies” in Wilson, Thomas M. and Donnan, Hastings (Eds.), A Companion to Border Studies (Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell), pp.1–25.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas M. and Donnan, Hastings (Eds.), 1998. Border Identities Nation and State at International Frontiers (UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas, 2007. “Boundaries (Racial/Ethnic)” in George, Ritzer (Ed.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Online, available at: http://www.sociologyencyclopedia.com/subscriber/uid=960/tocnode?query=Boundaries+(Racial%2FEthnic)&widen=1&result_number=1&from=search&id=g9781405124331_yr2015_chunk_g97814051243318_ss1-42&type=std&fuzzy=0&slop=1.&authstatuscode=202.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Lucy, 2012. “Darling Divas or Damaged Daughters? The Dark Side of Child Beauty Pageants and an Administrative Law Solution,” Tulane Law Review, 87: 427–55.Google Scholar
Wonderlich, Anna L., Ackard, Diann M., and Henderson, Judith B., 2005. “Childhood Beauty Pageant Contestants: Associations with Adult Disordered Eating and Mental Health,” Eating Disorders 13(3): 291–301.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, Barbara Bennett, 2009. “A World Fit for Children Is a World Fit for Everyone: Ecogenerism, Feminism, and Vulnerability,” Houston Law Review, 46: 818–65.Google Scholar
Worthington, Rebecca, 2009. “The Road to Parentless Children is Paved with Good Intentions: How the Hague Convention and Recent Intercountry Adoption Rules are Affecting Potential Parents and the Best Interests of Children,” Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 19(3): 559–86.Google Scholar
Wray, Helena, 2006. “An Ideal Husband? Marriages of Convenience, Moral Gate-Keeping and Immigration to the UK,” European Journal of Migration and Law, 8(3–4): 303–20.Google Scholar
Wray, Helena, Agoston, Agnes, and Hutton, Jocelyn, 2014. “A Family Resemblance? The Regulation of Marriage Migration in Europe,” European Journal of Migration and Law, 16(2): 209–47.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Ihsan, 2002. “The Challenge of Post-Modern Legality and Muslim Legal Pluralism in England,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(2): 343–54.Google Scholar
Yntema, Hessel E., 1953. “The Historic Bases of Private International Law,” The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2(3): 297–317.Google Scholar
Young, Alexandra, 2012. “Developments in Intercountry Adoption: From Humanitarian Aid to Market-Driven Policy and beyond,” Adoption & Fostering, 36(2): 67–78.Google Scholar
Zafran, Ruth, 2005. “The Relational Discourse as a Theoretical Basis for Resolving Family Disputes: Some Thought about Care and Justice” in Ben-Naftali, Orna & Naveh, Hannah (Eds.), Trials of Love (Tel Aviv: Ramot), pp. 605–55. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
Zayas, Luis, 2015. Forgotten Citizens: Deportation, Children, and the Making of American Exiles and Orphan (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Zayas, Luis H. and Bradlee, Mollie H., 2014. “Exiling Children, Creating Orphans: When Immigration Policies Hurt Citizens,” Social Work, 59(2): 167–75.Google Scholar
Zee, Machteld, 2014. “Five Options for the Relationship between the State and Sharia Councils: Untangling the Debate on Sharia Councils and Women’s Rights in the United Kingdom,” Journal of Religion and Society, 16: 1–18.Google Scholar
Zelig, Campos Kaylah, 1993. “Putting Responsibility Back into Marriage: Making a Case for Mandatory Prenuptials,” University of Colorado Law Review, 64: 1223–45.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A., 2005. The Purchase of Intimacy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A., 1994. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Zetter, Roger, 1991. “Labelling Refugees: Forming and Transforming a Bureaucratic Identity,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 4(1): 39–62.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Daphna Hacker, Tel-Aviv University
  • Book: Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization
  • Online publication: 30 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535004.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Daphna Hacker, Tel-Aviv University
  • Book: Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization
  • Online publication: 30 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535004.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Daphna Hacker, Tel-Aviv University
  • Book: Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization
  • Online publication: 30 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535004.011
Available formats
×