Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Tables
- Illustrations
- THE HAMLYN TRUST
- The Hamlyn Lectures
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: determining the public good
- 2 Professionalism re-assessed: what now for lawyers?
- 3 Access to justice: whither legal aid?
- 4 Judges and the public good: reflections on the last Law Lords
- 5 Conclusion
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Index
- References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Tables
- Illustrations
- THE HAMLYN TRUST
- The Hamlyn Lectures
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: determining the public good
- 2 Professionalism re-assessed: what now for lawyers?
- 3 Access to justice: whither legal aid?
- 4 Judges and the public good: reflections on the last Law Lords
- 5 Conclusion
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lawyers and the Public GoodDemocracy in Action?, pp. 198 - 211Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
1986
The Dead Parrot: Does Professional Self-regulation Exhibit Vital Signs?Alberta Law Review, 33 1995 800Google Scholar
www.ag.gov.au/a2jwww.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf
2010
2010
Pro Bono: Good Enough?Solicitors Journal 2010 www.solicitorsjournal.com/pictures/web/s/h/d/SJ%20Pro%20Bono.pdfGoogle Scholar
Raising the Bar: The Impact of Solicitor Advocates in ScotlandHonours Dissertation 2010Google Scholar
2005
Access to JusticeAmsterdamSitjoff & Noordhoff 1978
Legal Aid, A Market-based Approach to ReformLondonDepartment for Constitutional Affairs 2006Google Scholar
2006
Introducing a Parliamentary Confirmation Process for New Supreme Court JusticesPublic Law 2010 464Google Scholar
Review of the Regulatory Framework for Legal Services in England and WalesLondonMinistry of Justice 2004
The Counsel of Rogues? A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s RoleAldershotAshgate 2009Google Scholar
Understanding the Economic Rationale for Legal Services RegulationLondonRegulatory Policy Institute 2010Google Scholar
The Effects of Collegiality on Judicial Decision-MakingUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 2003 1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011 www.fljs.org/section.aspx?id=2946
Access to Justice in a World of Expanding Social CapabilityFordham Urban Law Journal 37 2010 115Google Scholar
Rethinking the Legal Profession’s Approach to Collective Self-Improvement: Competence and the Consumer PerspectiveWisconsin Law Review 1983 639Google Scholar
2010
2009
Scottish Civil Courts Review 2009 www.scotcourts.gov.uk/civilcourtsreview/theReport/Vol1Chap1_9.pdfGoogle Scholar
2003
The Distribution of Legal Services in the NetherlandsBritish Journal of Law and Society 4 1977 282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 www.ilagnet.org/papers.php
The Self-Regulation of the Legal Profession in Canada and in England and WalesEdmontonAlberta, Law Society of Alberta and Alberta Law Reform Institute 2000Google Scholar
2010
Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final ReportMinistry of Justice 2010 www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/jackson-final-report-140110.pdfGoogle Scholar
The Paradoxes of Regulatory ReformOxford/Harvard Legal Symposium 2009 www.legalservicesboard.org.ukGoogle Scholar
2010
The Professions are Dead, Long live the Professions: Legal Practice in a Post Professional WorldLaw and Society Review, 33 1999 713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011 www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/legal-aid-reform-151110.htm
2011
Understanding the Economic Rationale for Legal Services Regulation – A Collection Of EssaysLondonLegal Services Board 2011Google Scholar
2010 www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/what_we_do/pdf/20100929_referral_fees.pdf
2010 www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/cds_main/QAADiscussionPaper_Feb2010.pdf
Annual Report, 2001–2002LondonStationery Office 2002
Developing Mechanisms for Judicial Accountability in the UKLegal Studies, 24 2004 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corporate Lawyers and Corporate Governance: International Corporate Law and Financial Market RegulationCambridge University Press 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995
2010 http://womeninlaw.law.ed.ac.uk/documents/WilsonLecture.pdf
Review of Legal Aid Delivery and GovernanceLondonMinistry of Justice 2010 www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/legal-aid-delivery.pdfGoogle Scholar
2010
Rethinking the Merit Principle in Judicial SelectionJournal of Law and Society 33 2006 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010
Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and WalesLondonHMSO 2010
2010
Community Legal Advice Centres and Networks: A Process EvaluationLondonLegal Services Research Centre 2010Google Scholar
Lawyer Specialisation – Managing the Professional ParadoxLaw and Policy, 32 2010 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010 http://lawyerwatch.wordpress.com/2010/12/16
Pioneers in Practice: The Community Legal Service Pioneer Partnership Research ProjectLondonLord Chancellor’s Department 2000Google Scholar
Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General to the Houses of Parliament on the Community Legal Service Fund and the Criminal Defence Service accounts for the year ended 31 March 2010LondonThe Stationery Office 2010
The Procurement of Criminal Legal Aid in England and Wales by the Legal Services Commission, 27 November 2009LondonThe Stationery Office 2009
Lawyers’ Ideals/Lawyers’ Practices: Transformations in the American Legal ProfessionNew YorkCornell University Press 1992Google Scholar
2011
Regulation: Legal Form and Economic TheoryOxfordHart Publishing 2004
Unleashing AspirationLondonInstitute of Career Guidance, Cabinet Office 2009 www.icg-uk.org/article607.htmlGoogle Scholar
2011
2010
Law Deregulation via Business DeregulationInternational Journal of the Legal Profession, 6 1999 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Competing Images of the Legal Profession: Competing Regulatory StrategiesInternational Journal of the Sociology of Law 25 (1997),
Professionalism and the Legal Services MarketInternational Journal of Legal Studies 3 1996 137Google Scholar
Resourcing Civil JusticeOxford University Press 1996
How Law Firms can do Good while Doing Well (and the Answer is Not Pro Bono)Fordham Urban Law Journal, Symposium on Professional Challenges in Large-Firm Practice 33 2005 221Google Scholar
Consultation on Speciality Training Numbers from 2011 to 2015EdinburghScottish Executive 2010Google Scholar
Closing the Justice GapSolicitors Journal 2010 www.solicitorsjournal.com/Pictures/Web/k/l/p/Closing%20the%20Justice%20Gap.pdfGoogle Scholar
2004
2010
The Fulcrum point of Equal Access to JusticeLoyola of Los Angeles Law Review 42 2009 949Google Scholar
Report by the Research Working Group on Competition in the Legal Services Market in ScotlandEdinburghScottish Executive 2006
2010
The Legal Profession: Regulation and the ConsumerLondonSweet & Maxwell 1999
Professional Competence, Peer Review and Quality Assurance in England and Wales and in ScotlandAlberta Law Review 45 2008 151Google Scholar
Ghost Town Britain, the Threat from Economic Globalisation to Livelihoods, Liberty and Local Economic ReformLondonThe New Economics Foundation 2002
2010
2010
Managerialism and the Legal ProfessionInternational Journal of the Legal Profession, 2 1995 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003
Access to Justice: Beyond the Year 2000EdinburghThe Scottish Office 1998
2011 www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/03/15112328/0
National Security and the Role of the Court: A Changed Landscape?Law Quarterly Review 126 2010 543Google Scholar
The Common Law of Contracts: Are Broad Principles Better than Detailed Rules? An Empirical InvestigationTexas Wesleyan Law Review 11 2005 399Google Scholar