Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:59:24.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2022

Edited by
Jason König  and
Nicolas Wiater
Jason König
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Nicolas Wiater
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue , pp. 366 - 402
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalders, G. J. D. 1982. Plutarch’s Political Thought. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Accorinti, D. (ed.) 2016. Brill’s Companion to Nonnus of Panopolis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Acheraïou, A. 2008. Rethinking Postcolonialism: Colonialist Discourse in Modern Literatures and the Legacy of Classical Writers. Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Acheraïou, A. 2011. Questioning Hybridity, Postcolonialism and Globalization. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acquaro, E. 1991. ‘Le monete di Annibale’, in Le monete puniche in Italia, eds Acquaro, E., Manfredi, L. I. and Tusa Cutroni, A.. Rome, 71–5.Google Scholar
Adamietz, J. 1992. ‘Asianismus’, in Ueding (ed.), i: A–Bib, 1114–20.Google Scholar
Adams, C. E. P., and Laurence, R. (eds) 2001. Travel and Geography in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. E. 1993. Graecia Capta: The Landscapes of Roman Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. E., Cherry, J. F., and Elsner, J. (eds) 2001. Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. 2018. ‘A literary passage: Polybius and Plutarch’s narrator’, in Meeus (ed.), 171–209.Google Scholar
Alston, R. 2011. ‘Post-politics and the ancient Greek city’, in van Nijf and Alston (eds), 307–36.Google Scholar
Amato, E. (ed.) 2005. Favorinos d’Arles. Oeuvres. Tome i. Introduction générale; Témoignages; Discours aux Corinthiens; Sur la fortune. Paris.Google Scholar
Amato, E. (ed.) 2009. Severus sophista Alexandrinus: Progymnasmata quae exstant omnia. Berlin.Google Scholar
Amir, Y. 1985. ‘Homer und Bibel als Ausdrucksmittel im 3. Sibyllenbuch’, in Amir, Y., Studien zum antiken Judentum. Frankfurt, 83–100.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1989. ‘The pepaideumenos in action: sophists and their outlook in the early empire’, ANRW 2.33.1, 79–208.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1993. The Second Sophistic. A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2011. Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition. Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. 1995. ‘Aristotelian political thought in the Hellenistic period’, in Laks and Schofield (eds), 74–94.Google Scholar
Anz, T. 1998. Literatur und Lust. Glück und Unglück beim Lesen. Munich.Google Scholar
Appel, W. 2001. ‘Grabinschrift für Athenokles (zu IOSPE I2 687)’, ZPE 137: 179–82.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1963. ‘The crisis in culture’, in Arendt, H., Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, introduction by J. Kohn. New York, 2006, 194–222.Google Scholar
Argentieri, L. 2003. Gli epigrammi degli Antipatri. Le rane 35. Bari.Google Scholar
Argentieri, L. 2007. ‘Meleager and Philip as epigram collectors’, in Bing and Bruss (eds), 147–64.Google Scholar
Armbruster, K. and Wallace, K. R. (eds) 2001. Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism. Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. 2009. ‘Against nature: some Augustan responses to man-made marvels’, in Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture, ed. Hardie, P.. Oxford, 75–94.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P. 1984. ‘L’image du globe dans le monde romain: science, iconographie, symbolique’, MEFRA 96: 53–116.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von 1896. Dionis Prusaensis quem vocant Chrysostomum quae exstant omnia, II. Berlin.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von 1898. Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa. Berlin.Google Scholar
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. 2002. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1992. Denys d’Halicarnasse. Opuscules Rhétoriques, v. Paris.Google Scholar
Aujac, G., and Lebel, M. 1981. Denys d’Halicarnasse. Opuscules rhétoriques, ii: La composition stylistique. Paris.Google Scholar
Babut, D. 1969. Plutarque et le Stoicisme. Paris.Google Scholar
Bachmann, C. 2015. Wenn man die Welt als Gemälde betrachtet. Studien zu den Eikones Philostrats des Älteren. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2008. Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barclay, J. M. G. 1996. Jews in the Mediterranean Diaspora: From Alexander to Trajan (323 bce–117 ce). Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1997. ‘Roman Aristotle’, in Philosophia Togata, ii: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, eds Barnes, J. and Griffin, M.. Oxford, 1–69.Google Scholar
Barrow, R. 1967. Plutarch and His Times. London.Google Scholar
Bartlett, J. R. 1985. Jews in the Hellenistic World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bassino, P. 2013. Certamen Homeri et Hesiodi: Introduction, Critical Edition and Commentary. PhD Diss. Durham.Google Scholar
Bate, J. 2000. The Song of the Earth. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Battisti, D. G. 1997. Dionigi di Alicarnasso, Sull’imitazione. Edizione critica, traduzione e commento. Pisa.Google Scholar
Battistoni, F. 2006. ‘The ancient pinakes from Tauromenium: some new readings’, ZPE 157: 169–80.Google Scholar
Baumann, M. 2011. Bilder schreiben. Virtuose Ekphrasis in Philostrats Eikones. Berlin.Google Scholar
Baumann, M. 2013. ‘Der Betrachter im Bild. Metalepsen in antiken Ekphrasen’, in Über die Grenze. Metalepse in Text- und Bildmedien des Altertums, eds Eisen, U. and von Möllendorff, P.. Berlin, 257–91.Google Scholar
Baumann, M. 2018. ‘Wunderlektüren: Paradoxa und die Aktivität des Lesers in Diodors Bibliotheke’, in Die symphonischen Schwestern. Narrative Konstruktion von ‘Wahrheiten’ in der nachklassischen Geschichtsschreibung, eds Blank, T. and Maier, F. K.. Stuttgart, 227–40.Google Scholar
Baumann, M. 2020. Welt erzählen. Narration und das Vergnügen des Lesers in der ersten Pentade von Diodors Bibliotheke. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M. 2017. ‘Poets and poetry’, in Johnson and Richter (eds), 493–507.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M., and Bär, S. (eds) 2007. Quintus Smyrnaeus: Transforming Homer in Second Sophistic Epic. Berlin.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. 2013. ‘The burdensome mission of Pliny’s Natural History’, in König and Woolf (eds), 84–107.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2013. Confronting the Classics: Traditions, Adventures and Innovations. London.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (ed.) 2014. A Companion to Plutarch. Chichester.Google Scholar
Béranger, J. 1953. Recherches sur l’aspect idéologique du principat. Basel.Google Scholar
Bergk, W. T. 1872–94. Griechische Literaturgeschichte. Bd. 2, 3 aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben von Gustav Hinrichs; Bd. 4 aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben von Rudolf Peppmüller. Register von Rudolf Peppmüller und Wilhelm Hahn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. 1991. The Anatomy of National Fantasy. Chicago.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 1976. The Proper Study of Mankind. New York.Google Scholar
Bernard, S. 2018. Building Mid-Republican Rome. Labor, Architecture, and the Urban Economy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bernard, S., Damon, C. and Grey, C. 2014. ‘Rhetorics of land and power in the Polla inscription (CIL i2 638)’, Mnemosyne 67: 953–85.Google Scholar
Bernhardy, G. 1836–45. Grundriß der griechischen Litteratur, 2 vols. Halle.Google Scholar
Bernstein, M. A. 1994. Foregone Conclusions. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Besserman, L. (ed.) 1996. The Challenge of Periodization: Old Paradigms and New Perspectives. New York.Google Scholar
Bethe, E. 1918. ‘Iulius (398) Pollux’, RE x.1, 773–9.Google Scholar
Bexley, E. M. 2009. ‘Replacing Rome: geographic and political centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia’, CPh 104: 459–75.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. 1990. Nation and Narration. London.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. London.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 1983. ‘Hellenismus’. Geschichte und Problematik eines Epochenbegriffs. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Billault, A. 1995. ‘Peut-on appliquer la notion d’asianisme à l’analyse de l’esthétique des romans grecs?’, AAntHung 36: 107–18.Google Scholar
Billault, A. 2004. ‘Littérature et rhétorique dans le discours XVIII de Dion Chrysostome Sur l’entraînement à la parole’, REG 117: 504–18.Google Scholar
Bing, P. 2005. ‘The politics and poetics of geography in the Milan Posidippus Section One: On stones (AB 1–20)’, in The New Posidippus. A Hellenistic Poetry Book, ed. Gutzwiller, K. J.. Oxford, 119–40 (reprinted in Bing 2009: 253–70).Google Scholar
Bing, P. 2008. The Well-Read Muse. Past and Present in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. With a New Introduction. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Bing, P. 2009. The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Bing, P., and Bruss, J. S. (eds) 2007. Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram. Leiden.Google Scholar
Biraschi, A. M., and Salmeri, G. (eds) 2000. Strabone e l’Asia Minore. Perugia.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1865. Die griechische Beredsamkeit in dem Zeitraum von Alexander bis auf Augustus. Ein litterarhistorischer Versuch. Berlin.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1887. Die attische Beredsamkeit. 1. Abtheilung: von Gorgias bis zu Lysias. 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1893. Die attische Beredsamkeit. 3. Abtheilung, 1. Abschnitt: Demosthenes. 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1901. Die Rhythmen der attischen Kunstprosa: Isokrates – Demosthenes – Platon. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blass, F. 1905. Die Rhythmen der asianischen und römischen Kunstprosa. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bodenhamer, D. J., Corrigan, J., and Harris, T. M. (eds) 2010. The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Bommelaer, B. 1989. Diodore de Sicile, Bibliothèque Historique, Livre iii. Paris.Google Scholar
Bompaire, J. 1958. Lucien écrivain. Imitation et création. Paris.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C. 2015. Les enfants de Cadmos. La paysage religieux de la Phénicie hellénistique. Paris.Google Scholar
Borg, B. E. (ed.) 2004. Paideia. The World of the Second Sophistic. BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, B. E. (ed.) 2011. ‘Who cared about Greek identity? Athens in the first century bce’, in Schmitz and Wiater (eds), 213–34.Google Scholar
Bosak-Schroeder, C. 2020. Other Natures: Environmental Encounters with Ancient Greek Ethnography. Oakland.Google Scholar
Bost-Pouderon, C. 2008. ‘Dion Chrysostome et le genre épistolaire: à propos du Περὶ λόγου ἀσκήσεως (Or. xviii), le seul “discours” de Dion rédigé sous la form épistolaire: un traité ou une lettre?’, in Epistulae Antiquae, v, eds Laurence, P. and Guillaumont, F.. Louvain, 37–47.Google Scholar
Boulanger, A. 1923. Aelius Aristide et la sophistique dans la province d’Asie au IIe siècle de notre ère. Paris.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1965. Augustus and the Greek World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1969. Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 2004. ‘Artemidorus and the Second Sophistic’, in Borg (ed.), 53–64.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1974. ‘Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic’, in Studies in Ancient Society, ed. Finley, M. I.. Rev. ed. London: 166–209.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1989a. ‘Poetry and poets in Asia and Achaia’, in The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire, eds Cameron, A. and Walker, S.. ICS Bulletin Supplement 55. London, 198–205.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1989b. ‘Greek sophists and Greek poetry in the Second Sophistic’, ANRW 2.33.1, 209–58.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1990. ‘Greek poetry in the Antonine age’, in Antonine Literature, ed. Russell, D. A.. Oxford, 53–90.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1994. ‘Philostratus: writer of fiction’, in Greek Fiction. The Greek Novel in Context, eds Morgan, J. R. and Stoneman, R.. London, 181–99.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2004. ‘The geography of the Second Sophistic: cultural variations’, in Borg (ed.), 65–83.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2008. ‘Luxury cruisers? Philip’s epigrammatists between Greece and Rome’, Aevum(ant) 8: 223–58 (published 2012).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2011. ‘Men from Mytilene’, in Schmitz and Wiater (eds), 181–95.Google Scholar
Boym, S. 2001. The Future of Nostalgia. New York.Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. 2000. ‘Dio, Socrates, and Cynicism’, in Dio Chrysostom. Politics, Letters, and Philosophy, ed. Swain, S.. Oxford, 240–60.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, J. D. 1983. ‘Hannibal as Alexander’, AncW 7: 111–28.Google Scholar
Bremen, R. 1996. The Limits of Participation: Women and Civic Life in the Greek East in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bremen, R. 2013. ‘Neoi in Hellenistic cities: age class, institution, association?’, in Fröhlich and Hamon (eds), 31–58.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. 1977. In Mist Apparelled. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bricault, L., and Versluys, J.-M. (eds) 2014. Power, Politics and the Cult of Isis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bridges, E. 2015. Imagining Xerxes: Ancient Perspectives on a Persian King. London.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. 2004. ‘L’utilisation de la figure d’Héraklès par Hannibal. Remarques sur les fragments de Silénos de Kaléaktè, in Hispanité et romanité, ed. André, J.-M.. Collección de la casa de Velázquez 88. Madrid, 29–37.Google Scholar
Brock, R. 2013. Greek Political Imagery from Homer to Aristotle. London.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2000. Virtuelle Antike. Wendepunkte der Alten Geschichte. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2003. Terra Cognita. Studien zur römischen Raumerfassung. 2nd ed. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2014. Philostratos. Leben der Sophisten. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Brooks, E. (ed.) 1970. P. Rutilii Lupi De Figuris Sententiarum et Elocutionis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R., and Cooper, F. 2009. ‘Beyond “identity”’, Theory and Society 29: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1994. ‘The bubble of the Second Sophistic’, BICS 39: 25–52.Google Scholar
Budé, G. 1948. Dion Chrysostome, Épitre à un inconnu sur la formation oratoire. Carouge.Google Scholar
Buell, L. 2001. Writing for an Endangered World: Literature, Culture, and the Environment in the US and Beyond. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bücheler, F. 1883. ‘Catalepton’, RhM 38: 507–25.Google Scholar
Buell, L. 2005. The Future of Environmental Criticism. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Buffière, F. 1956. Les mythes d’Homère et la penseé grecque. Paris.Google Scholar
Buitenwerf, R. 2003. Book iii of the Sibylline Oracles and Its Social Setting. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bulhof, J. 1999. ‘What if? Modality and history’, H&Th 38: 145–68.Google Scholar
Buresch, K. 1892. ‘Die sibyllinische Quellgrotte in Erythrae’, Mittheilungen des kaiserlich deutschen archäologischen Instituts, athenische Abtheilung 17: 16–36.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1984. Die orientalisierende Epoche in der griechischen Religion und Kultur. Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. 2018. Ancient Christian Ecopoetics: Cosmologies, Saints, Things. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Burstein, S. M. 1989. Agatharchides of Cnidus, On the Erythraean Sea. London.Google Scholar
Burton, A. 1972. Diodorus Siculus. Book I: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Busse, K. 2006. ‘My life is a WIP on my LJ: slashing the slasher and the reality of celebrity and internet performances’, in Busse and Hellekson (eds), 207–24.Google Scholar
Busse, K., and Hellekson, K. (eds) 2006. Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet: New Essays. Jefferson.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. 2016. ‘Mind, body, and metaphor in ancient Greek concepts of emotion’, L’atelier du centre de recherche historique 16, Histoire intellectuelle des émotions de l’Antiquité à nos jours, eds Boquet, D. and Nagy, P. (https://journals.openedition.org/acrh/7416; accessed 26 March 2020).Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 2016. Hellenistic Epigram. Contexts of Exploration. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Calabi, F. 2008. God’s Acting, Man’s Acting: Tradition and Philosophy in Philo of Alexandria. Leiden.Google Scholar
Calasso, R. 1993. The Marriage of Cadmus and Harmony. New York.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. 1986. ‘Nota di aggiornamento’, in Norden, E., La prosa d’arte antica dal VI secolo a.C. all’età della Rinascenza, tr. and ed. Heinemann Campana, B., 2 vols. Rome, 969–1185.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. 1987. ‘Asianesimo e atticismo: retorica, letteratura e linguistica’, in Studi di retorica oggi in Italia, ed. Pennacini, A.. Bologna, 31–53.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. 1988. ‘Asiani (Oratori)’, in Dizionario degli scrittori greci e latini, i. Milan, 215–32.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1993. The Greek Anthology from Meleager to Planudes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 2016. Wandering Poets and Other Essays on Late Greek Literature and Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Canevaro, M., and Gray, B. (eds) 2018. The Hellenistic Reception of Classical Athenian Democracy and Political Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M. 2014. ‘Experientiality’, in The Living Handbook of Narratology, eds P. Hühn et al. Hamburg (online edition www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/experientiality; accessed 28 February 2021).Google Scholar
Caragounis, C. 2014. ‘Asianism’, in Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, i: A–F, ed. Giannakis, G.. Leiden and Boston, 178–81.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. 1986 What Is History? Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Casson, L. 1989. The Periplus Maris Erythraei: Text with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Princeton.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 2014. ‘The pseudo-Pythagorean writings’, in A History of Pythagoreanism, ed. Huffman, C. A.. Cambridge, 315–40.Google Scholar
Champion, C. B. 2004. Cultural Politics in Polybius’ Histories. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 1987. ‘Das Ehrendekret für Diophantos (IOSPE I2 352) und Geschichtsschreibung’, in Acta Centri Historiae Terra Antiqua Balcanica, ii, eds Fol, A., Zhivkov, V. and Nedjalkov, N.. Sofia, 233–5.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 1997. ‘Theatricality beyond the theater: staging public life in the Hellenistic world’, in Le Guen (ed.), 219–59.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2009. ‘A few things Hellenistic audiences appreciated in musical performances’, in Martinelli (ed.), 75–97.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2013a. ‘Paradoxon, enargeia, empathy: Hellenistic decrees and Hellenistic oratory’, in Kremmydas and Tempest (eds), 201–16.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2013b. ‘Emotional language in Hellenistic decrees and Hellenistic histories’, in Mari and Thornton (eds), 339–52.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, J. H. 1985. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and the New Testament. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cheah, P., and Robbins, B. (eds) 1998. Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Christ, W. von, Stählin, O., and Schmid, W. 1920. Geschichte der griechischen Literatur. Zweiter Teil: die nachklassische Periode der griechischen Literatur, 2 vols. Munich.Google Scholar
Chuvin, P. 1991. Mythologie et géographie Dionysiaques: recherches sur l’œuvre de Nonnos de Panopolis. Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. 1922. Römische Studien. Historisches Epigraphisches Literargeschichtliches aus vier Jahrhunderten Roms. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 2006a. ‘The concept of the classical and the canons of model authors in Roman literature’, in Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, ed. Porter, J. I.. Princeton, 204–34.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 2006b. ‘Quintilian and the perception of the system of poetic genres in the Flavian age’, in Flavian Poetry, eds Nauta, R. R., van Dam, H.-J. and Smolenaars, J. J. L.. Leiden, 1–19.Google Scholar
Civiletti, M. 2002. Filostrato. Vite dei sofisti. Introduzione, traduzione e note. Milan.Google Scholar
Clark, T. 2019. The Value of Ecocriticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 1997. ‘In search of the author of Strabo’s Geography’, JRS 87: 92–110.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 1999. Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 2008. Making Time for the Past. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 2018. Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man and Nature in Herodotus’ Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J., and Cuypers, M. (eds) 2010. A Companion to Hellenistic Literature. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Coates, P. 1998. Nature: Western Attitudes since Western Times. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cogitore, I. 2010. ‘Crinagoras et les poètes de la Couronne de Philippe: la cour impériale romaine dans les yeux des Grecs’, in Des rois au prince. Pratiques du pouvoir monarchique dans l’Orient hellénistique et romain (IVe siècle avant J.-C.–IIe siècle après J.-C.), eds Savalli-Lestrade, I. and Amandry, M.. Grenoble, 253–70.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. 2001. ‘Art, myth, and travel in the Hellenistic world’, in Alcock, Cherry and Elsner eds, 93–126.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. 1995. Philo Judaeus: His Universe of Discourse. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. J. D. 2010. The Significance of Yavneh and Other Essays in Jewish Hellenism. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 136. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Cohoon, J. W. 1939. Dio Chrysostom, Discourses 12–30. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cole, T. 1991. The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Coleman, K., and Nelis-Clément, J. (eds) 2012. L’organisation des spectacles dans le monde romain. Entretiens Hardt 58. Geneva.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. 1974. The Sibylline Oracles of Egyptian Judaism. Missoula.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. (ed.) 1979. Apocalypse: The Morphology of a Genre. Semeia 14. Missoula.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. 1986. ‘Apocalyptic literature’, in Early Judaism and Its Modern Interpreters, eds Kraft, R. A. and Nickelsburg, G. W. E.. Atlanta, 345–70.Google Scholar
Collins, J. J. 1997. Seers, Sibyls and Sages in Hellenistic-Roman Judaism. Leiden.Google Scholar
Colonna, A. (ed.) 1953. ‘I Prolegomeni ad Esiodo e la Vita Esiodea di G. Tzetzes’, BPEC 2: 27–39.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2001a. ‘Reclaiming the theatrical in the second sophistic’, Helios 28: 75–96.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2001b. ‘Problems of the past in imperial Greek education’, in Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, ed. Too, Y. L.. Leiden, 339–73.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2003. ‘Like the labors of Heracles: andreia and paideia in imperial Greek culture’, in Andreia: Ancient Constructions of Manly Courage, eds Rosen, R. and Sluiter, I.. Leiden, 287–317.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 2007. ‘Being Greek/being Roman: hellenism and assimilation in the Roman empire’, Millennium Jahrbuch zu Kultur und Geschichte 101: 93–119.Google Scholar
Conybeare, C., and Goldhill, S. (eds) 2020. Classical Philology and Theology: Disavowal, Entanglement and the God-Like Scholar. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (ed.) 2013. Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cowley, R. 1999. What If? New York.Google Scholar
Cresci Marrone, G. 1993. Ecumene Augustea. Una politica per il consenso. Rome.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 1996. Writing, Teachers and Students in Graeco-Roman Egypt. American Studies in Papyrology 36. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 2001. Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton.Google Scholar
Cronin, S. (ed.) 2008. Subalterns and Social Protest: History from Below in the Middle East and North Africa. London.Google Scholar
Curty, O. 2015. Gymnasiarchika. Recueil et analyse des inscriptions de l’époque hellénistique en l’honneur des gymnasiarques. Paris.Google Scholar
Cuypers, M. 2010. ‘Historiography, rhetoric, and science: rethinking a few assumptions on Hellenistic prose’, in Clauss and Cuypers (eds), 317–36.Google Scholar
Danker, F. W. 1982. Benefactor: Epigraphic Study of a Graeco-Roman and New Testament Semantic Field. St. Louis.Google Scholar
Davies, P. J. E. 2017. Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dawson, D. 1991. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Delcourt, A. 2005. Lecture des Antiquités romaines de Denys d’Halicarnasse. Un historien entre deux mondes. Brussels.Google Scholar
della Dora, V. 2011. Imagining Mount Athos: Visions of a Holy Place from Homer to World War II. Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Demandt, A. 2001. Ungeschehene Geschichte. Göttingen.Google Scholar
De Morais Mota, C. 2010. The Lessons of Universal History of Diodorus of Sicily’s. An Educational Process of Humanity. Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. 1952. Greek Prose Style. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Desideri, P. 1978. Dione di Prusa. Un intellettuale greco nell’impero romano. Florence.Google Scholar
Diggle, J. 2005. ‘Rhythmical prose in the Euripidean hypotheses’, in Euripide e i papiri, eds Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A.. Florence, 27–67.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. 1986. ‘Philosophie – Fachwissenschaft – Allgemeinbildung’, in Aspects de la philosophie hellénistique: neuf exposés suivis de discussions, eds Flashar, H. and Gigon, O.. Entretiens Hardt 32. Geneva, 185–231.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. 2011, ‘Greek classicism’, in Schmitz and Wiater (eds), 47–60.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1988. ‘“Orthodoxy” and “eclecticism”: Middle Platonists and Neo-Pythagoreans’, in The Question of ‘Eclecticism’. Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, eds Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A.. Berkeley, 103–25.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 1996. The Middle Platonists. A Study of Platonism 80 bc to ad 220. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Dörner, F. K. 1996. ‘Translation of the Nomos inscription’, in Nemrud Daği. The Hierothesion of Antiochus I of Commagene, i: Text, ed. D. H. Sanders. Winona Lake, 213–17.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1964. Der Königskult des Antiochus von Kommagene im Lichte neuer Inschriften-Funde. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Dolar, M. 2006. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Donadi, F. 2000. ‘Il caso Egesia. Sulla possibilità e convenienza di una nuova edizione del De compositione verborum di Dionigi d’Alicarnasso’, in Letteratura e riflessione sulla letteratura nella cultura classica, ed. Arrighetti, G.. Pisa, 327–43.Google Scholar
Doulamis, K. 2011. ‘Forensic oratory and rhetorical theory in Chariton Book 5’, in Echoing Narratives: Studies of Intertextuality in Greek and Roman Prose Fiction, ed. Doulamis, K.. Groningen, 21–48.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1971. Theocritus: Select Poems. London.Google Scholar
Drerup, E. 1901. ‘Die Anfänge der rhetorischen Kunstprosa’, Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, Suppl. 27: 219–351.Google Scholar
Dubuisson, M. 1983. ‘Les Opici: Osques, occidentaux ou barbares’, Latomus 42: 522–45.Google Scholar
Dubuisson, M. 1985. Le latin de Polybe. Paris.Google Scholar
Dueck, D. 2000. Strabo of Amasia. A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome. London.Google Scholar
Dueck, D. (ed.) 2017. The Routledge Companion to Strabo. London.Google Scholar
Dueck, D., Lindsay, H., and Pothecary, S. (eds) 2005. Strabo’s Cultural Geography. The Making of a Kolossourgia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Duff, T. E. 1999. Plutarch’s Lives. Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford.Google Scholar
Duff, T. E. 2014. ‘The prologues’, in Beck (ed.), 333–49.Google Scholar
Eckholdt, J.-F. 2019. Von göttlicher Vorsehung bis Zufall. Tyche im Werk des Plutarch von Chaironeia. Berlin.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M. 1995. Moral Vision in the Histories of Polybius. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 2003. ‘Incorporating the alien. The art of conquest’, in Rome the Cosmopolis, eds Edwards, C. and Woolf, G.. Cambridge, 44–70.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. 2013. Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer. The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2002. ‘Introduction: the genres of ekphrasis’, Ramus 31: 1–18.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2014. ‘Lithic poetics: Posidippus and his stones’, Ramus 43: 152–72.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2017. ‘Pfeiffer, Fraenkel and refugee scholarship in Oxford, during and after the Second World War’, in The Ark of Civilization, eds Crawford, S., Ulmschneider, K. and Elsner, J.. Oxford, 25–49.Google Scholar
Engelmann, H., and Merkelbach, R. 1973. Die Inschriften von Erythrai und Klazomenai, ii. Bonn.Google Scholar
Engels, J. 1999. Augusteische Oikumenegeographie und Universalhistorie im Werk Strabons von Amaseia. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Engels, J. 2005. ‘῎Ανδρες ἔνδοξοι or “men of high reputation”’, in Dueck, Lindsay and Pothecary (eds), 129–43.Google Scholar
Engels, J. 2007. ‘Geography and history’ in A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, ed. Marincola, J.. Oxford, 541–52.Google Scholar
Engels, J. 2012. ‘Artemidoros of Ephesos and Strabo of Amasia’, in Intorno al papiro di Artemidoro, ii, eds Kramer, B. and Settis, S.. Milan, 139–55.Google Scholar
Errington, R. M. 2002. ‘Biographie in hellenistischen Inschriften’, in Vössing (ed.), 14–28.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. 1990. The Hellenistic Stoa: Political Thought and Action. London.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. 2014. Altered Pasts. Counterfactuals in History. Waltham.Google Scholar
Fabrizi, V. 2015. ‘Hannibal’s march and Roman imperial space in Livy, Ab urbe condita, Book 21’, Philologus 159: 118–55.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, A. 1931. Elder Philostratus: Imagines. Younger Philostratus: Imagines. Callistratus: Descriptions. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fairweather, J. 1981. Seneca the Elder. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth, tr. R. Philcox, with commentary by J.-P. Sartre and H. K. Bhabha. New York 2004.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M., and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge (original Italian ed. Rome 2002).Google Scholar
Faraone, C. 2019. ‘Circe’s instructions to Odysseus (Od. 10.507–40) as an early Sibylline Oracle’, JHS 139: 49–66.Google Scholar
Favreau-Linder, A. M. 2004. ‘Polémon de Laodicée: l’énigme d’un style’, in L’ultima parola. L’analisi dei testi: teorie e pratiche nell’antichità greca e latina, eds Abbamonte, G., Conti Bizzarro, F. and Spina, L.. Naples, 105–21.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2001. The Gods in Epic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2005. ‘Review: the beginnings of a literature in Latin’, JRS 95: 226–40.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2016. Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. 1998. Virtual History. Alternatives and Counterfactuals. London.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 1988. Philhellénisme et impérialisme. Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique, de la seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre Mithridate. Rome.Google Scholar
Ferrucci, S. 2013. ‘L’ambigua virtù: φιλοτιμία nell’Atene degli oratori’, in Mari and Thornton (eds), 123–36.Google Scholar
Flatt, T. 2017. ‘Desire and limits of lament in Homer’, CJ 4: 385–404.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. 1996. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. 2010. ‘Experience, experientiality, and historical narrative. A view from narratology’, in Erfahrung und Geschichte. Historische Sinnbildung in Pränarrativen, eds Breyer, T. and Creutz, D.. Berlin, 40–72.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1950. Aeschylus. Agamemnon, 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Forster, F. 2018. Die Polis im Wandel. Ehrendekrete für eigene Bürger im Kontext der hellenistischen Polisgesellschaft. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Fox, M. 1993. ‘History and rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, JRS 83: 31–47.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1999. ‘Epilogue’, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 771–97.Google Scholar
French, R. 1994. Ancient Natural History. Histories of Nature. London.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, P. 2005. ‘Dépenses publiques et évergétisme des citoyens dans l’exercice des charges publiques à Priène à la basse époque hellénistique’, in Fröhlich and Müller (eds), 225–56.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, P. 2013. ‘Les groupes du gymnase d’Iasos et les presbyteroi dans les cités à l’époque hellénistique’, in Fröhlich and Hamon (eds), 59–112.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, P., and Hamon, P. (eds) 2013. Groupes et associations dans les cités grecques (IIIe siècle av. J.-C.–IIe siècle ap. J.-C). Actes de la table ronde de Paris, INHA, 19–20 juin 2009. Geneva.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, P., and Müller, C. (eds) 2005. Citoyenneté et participation à la basse époque hellénistique. Actes de la table ronde des 22 et 23 mai 2004. Geneva.Google Scholar
Furtwängler, A. 1884–90. ‘Atlas’, in Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie, i, ed. Roscher, W. H.. Leipzig, 704–11.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1991. Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gaebel, R. E. 1970. ‘The Greek word-lists to Virgil and Cicero’, BRL 52: 284–325.Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. 2005. Quintus Smyrnaeus und die ‘Aeneis’: Zur Nachwirkung Vergils in der griechischen Literatur der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (ed.) 2005. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C., and Greenblatt, S. 2000. Practicing New Historicism. Chicago.Google Scholar
Gandini, C. 2015. Diplomatico e poeta: Crinagora di Mitilene nella Roma di Augusto. Reggio Calabria.Google Scholar
Gargola, D. J. 2017. The Shape of the Roman Order. The Republic and Its Spaces. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Garulli, V. 2012. Byblos Lainee: Epigrafia, Letteratura, Epitafio. Bologna.Google Scholar
Garvie, A. F. 1994. Homer, Odyssey. Books vi–viii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gasparro, G. S. 1997. Daimon and Tuche in the Hellenistic Religious Experience. Aarhus.Google Scholar
Gauthier, P. 1985. Les cités grecques et leurs bienfaiteurs. Athens.Google Scholar
Geffcken, J. 1902. Die Oracula Sibyllina. Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller 8. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. 2014a. Hellenism in the East: Studies on Greek Intellectuals in Palestine. Historia Einzelschriften 229. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. 2014b. ‘The Project of parallel lives. Plutarch’s conception of biography’, in Beck (ed.), 292–303.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1972. Figures iii. Paris.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 2004. Métalepse: de la figure à la fiction. Paris.Google Scholar
Geus, K., and Rathmann, M. (eds) 2013. Vermessung der Oikumene. Topoi. Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 14. Berlin.Google Scholar
Geus, K., and Thiering, M. (eds) 2014. Features of Common Sense Geography. Implicit Knowledge Structures in Ancient Geographical Texts. Antike Kultur und Geschichte 16. Zurich.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. 2016. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago.Google Scholar
Giannakis, G. 2001. ‘Light is life, dark is death: an Ancient Greek and Indo-European metaphor’, Philologia 30: 127–53.Google Scholar
Gibson, B., and Harrison, T. (eds) 2013. Polybius and His World. Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2003. ‘The school in the Roman imperial period’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge, 33–58.Google Scholar
Giuliani, L. 2007. ‘Die unmöglichen Bilder des Philostrat: Ein antiker Beitrag zur Paragone-Debatte?’, in Übersetzung und Transformation, eds Böhme, H., Rapp, C. and Rösler, W.. Berlin, 401–23.Google Scholar
Glacken, C. J. 1969. Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Goggin, M. G. 1951. ‘Rhythm in the prose of Favorinus’, YCS 12: 149–201.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.) 2001. Being Greek under Rome. Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.) 2002. Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.) 2020. Preposterous Poetics: the Politics and Aesthetics of Form in Late Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.) (forthcoming). ‘Latin literature and Greek’, in The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature, eds Gibson, R. and Whitton, C.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. 2018. Byzantine Ecocriticism: Women, Nature, and Power in the Medieval Greek Romance. Cham.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F., and Page, D. 1968. The Greek Anthology, ii: The Garland of Philip. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grandjean, Y. 1975. Une nouvelle arétalogie d’Isis à Maronée. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gray, B. 2013a. ‘Philosophy of education and the later Hellenistic polis’, in Martzavou and Papazarkadas (eds), 233–53.Google Scholar
Gray, B. 2013b. ‘The polis becomes humane? Philanthropia as a cardinal civic virtue in later Hellenistic honorific epigraphy and historiography’, in Mari and Thornton (eds), 137–62.Google Scholar
Gray, B. 2018. ‘A civic alternative to Stoicism: the ethics of Hellenistic honorary decrees’, ClAnt 37: 187–235.Google Scholar
Gray, J., Sandvoss, C., and Harrington, C. L. (eds) 2007. Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2002. Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E. 2018. ‘When Homer quotes Callimachus: allusive poetics in the proem of the Posthomerica’, CQ 68: 257–74.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E. 2020. The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic: Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica and the Poetics of Impersonation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2013. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: ‘Futures Past’ from Herodotus to Augustine, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2020. ‘Representation delimited and historicized: metalepsis in ancient literature and vase-painting’, in Metalepsis: Ancient Texts, New Perspectives, eds Matzner, S. and Trimble, G.. Oxford, 25–57.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J., and Rengakos, A. (eds) 2017. Griechische Literaturgeschichtsschreibung. Traditionen, Probleme und Konzepte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Grieb, V. 2008. Hellenistische Demokratie. Politische Organisation und Struktur in freien griechischen Poleis nach Alexander dem Großen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1993. Alive in Myth. New York.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. 1997. ‘Philosophy, politics, and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin and Barnes (eds), 1–37.Google Scholar
Griffin, M., and Barnes, J. (eds) 1997. Philosophia Togata, i: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Rev. paperback ed. (originally published in 1989). Oxford.Google Scholar
Groot, A. W. 1915. ‘Methodological investigations into the rhythm of Greek prose’, CQ 9: 231–44.Google Scholar
Groot, A. W. 1919a. A Handbook of Antique Prose-Rhythm, i. Groningen.Google Scholar
Groot, A. W. 1919b. De numero oratorio latino. Groningen.Google Scholar
Groot, A. W. 1921. Der antike Prosarhythmus. Groningen.Google Scholar
Groot, A. W. 1926. La prose métrique des anciens. Paris.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Groot, A. W. 1998a. Heritage and Hellenism: The Reinvention of Jewish Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Groot, A. W. 1998b. ‘Jews, Greeks and Romans in the Third Sibylline Oracle’, in Jews in a Graeco-Roman World, ed. Goodman, M.. Oxford, 15–36.Google Scholar
Groot, A. W. 2016. Constructs of Identity in Hellenistic Judaism: Essays on Early Jewish Literature and History. Deuterocanonical and Cognate Literature Studies 29. Berlin.Google Scholar
Guast, W. 2019. ‘Greek declamation beyond Philostratus’ Second Sophistic’, JHS 139: 172–86.Google Scholar
Günther, L.-M (ed.) 2012. Migration und Bürgerrecht in der hellenistischen Welt. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Güthenke, C. 2020. Feeling and Classical Philology: Knowing Antiquity in German Scholarship, 1770–1920. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Guez, J.-P. 2012. ‘Magie et sophistique dans la Vie d’Apollonios de Tyane’, in Éclats de littérature grecque d’Homère à Pascal Quignard: mélanges offerts à Suzanne Saïd, eds Dubel, S., Gotteland, S. and Oudot, E.. Nanterre, 191–231.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. 1998. Poetic Garlands. Hellenistic Epigrams in Context. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. 2007. A Guide to Hellenistic Literature. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Haake, M. 2007. Der Philosoph in der Stadt: Untersuchungen zur öffentlichen Rede über Philosophen und Philosophie in den hellenistischen Poleis. Munich.Google Scholar
Habinek, T., and Schiesaro, A. (eds) 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hadas-Lebel, M. 2003. Philon d’Alexandrie: un penseur en diaspore. Paris.Google Scholar
Hadjittofi, F. 2010. ‘Nonnus’ unclassical epic: imaginary geography in the Dionysiaca’, in Unclassical Traditions, ii: Perspectives from East and West in Late Antiquity, eds Kelly, C., Flower, R. and Williams, M. S.. Cambridge Classical Journal, Suppl. 35. Cambridge, 29–42.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. 1990. ‘The ethical doxography of Arius Didymus’, ANRW 2.36.4, 2935–3055.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. 2007. ‘Critolaus and late hellenistic peripatetic philosophy’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers. Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 bc, eds Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D. N.. Naples, 49–101.Google Scholar
Hall, E., and Wyles, R. (eds) 2008. New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hallock, T., Kamps, I., Raber, K. L. (eds) 2008. Early Modern Ecostudies: From the Florentine Codex to Shakespeare. New York.Google Scholar
Hammer, C. 1898. Rev. von Arnim 1898. Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 18: 836–40.Google Scholar
Hamon, P. 2009. ‘Démocraties grecques après Alexandre: à propos de trois ouvrages récents’, Topoi 16: 347–82.Google Scholar
Hamon, P. 2012. ‘Gleichheit, Ungleichheit und Euergetismus: die isotes in den kleinasiatischen Poleis der hellenistischen Zeit’, in Mann and Scholz (eds), 56–73.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1988. ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies 14: 575–99.Google Scholar
Hardwick, L. 2020. ‘Aspirations and mantras in classical reception research: can there really be dialogue between ancient and modern?’, in Framing Classical Reception Studies: Different Perspectives on a Developing Field, eds de Pourcq, M., de Haan, N. and Rijser, D.. Leiden, 15–32.Google Scholar
Harmon, A. M. 1953. Lucian, i. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2005. ‘Mastering the landscape’, in Titulus: Essays in Memory of Stanislaw Kalita, ed. Dabrowa, E.. Cracow, 27–33.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. 2013. ‘The texts of Plato and Aristotle in the first century bc’, in Plato, Aristotle and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc. New Directions for Philosophy, ed. Schofield, M.. Cambridge, 1–27.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. 2017. ‘Strabo’s philosophy and Stoicism’, in Dueck (ed.), 9–21.Google Scholar
Hau, L.I. 2011. ‘Tykhē in Polybios: narrative answers to a philosophical question’, Histos 5: 183–207.Google Scholar
Hau, L.I. 2016. Moral History from Herodotus to Diodorus Siculus. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hau, L.I. 2018a. ‘Diodorus’ use of Agatharchides’ description of Africa’, in Histoire et géographie chez les auteurs grecs d’époque romaine, eds M. Coltelloni-Trannoy and S. Morlet. Paris, 27–42.Google Scholar
Hau, L.I. 2018b. ‘Narrator and narratorial persona in Diodoros’ Bibliotheke (and their implications for the tradition of Greek historiography)’, in Hau, Meeus and Sheridan (eds), 277–301.Google Scholar
Hau, L., Meeus, A., and Sheridan, B. (eds) 2018. Diodoros of Sicily: Historiographical Theory and Practice in the Bibliotheke. Studia Hellenistica 58. Leuven.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. 2013. Greece and Mesopotamia: Dialogues in Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hawthorn, G. 1991. Plausible Worlds. Possibility and the Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heath, M. 1989a. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus “On Imitation”’, Hermes 117: 370–3.Google Scholar
Heath, M. 1989b. Unity in Greek Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heibges, S. 1911. De clausulis Charitoneis. Halle.Google Scholar
Heise, U. K. 2008. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heller, A., and Pont, A.-V. (eds) 2012. Patrie d’origine et patries électives: les citoyennetés multiples dans le monde grec d’époque romaine. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey. 1991. The Maculate Muse. Obscene Language in Attic Comedy. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, John. 2001. ‘From Megalopolis to cosmopolis: Polybius, or there and back again’, in Goldhill (ed.), 29–49.Google Scholar
Herzog-Hauser, G. 1948. ‘Tyche’, RE vii.A2, 1643–89.Google Scholar
Heßler, J. E. 2014. Epikur: Brief an Menoikeus. Basel.Google Scholar
Hidber, T. 1996. Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass: die Praefatio zu ‘De oratoribus veteribus’. Einleitung, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hidber, T. 2011. ‘Impacts of writing in Rome: Greek authors and their Roman environment in the first century bce’, in Schmitz and Wiater (eds), 115–23.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext. Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, F. T. 1967. ‘Der römische Straßenbau zur Zeit der Gracchen’, Historia 16: 162–76.Google Scholar
Hinterhöller-Klein, M. 2015. Varietates topiorum: Perspektive und Raumerfassung in Landschafts- und Panoramabildern der römischen Wandmalerei vom 1. Jh. v. Chr. bis zum Ende der pompejanischen Stile. Vienna.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 1993. ‘Conquest, competition and consensus: Roman expansion in Italy and the rise of the nobilitas’, repr. in Hölkeskamp 2004, 11–48.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2001. ‘Capitol, Comitium und Forum: öffentliche Räume, sakrale Topographie und Erinnerungslandschaften’, repr. in Hölkeskamp 2004, 137–65.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. 2004. Senatus Populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik - Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hoeschele, R. 2017. ‘A lapidary tête-à-tête with Homer: Two epigram cycles from the Villa of Aelian’, in Traditions épiques et poésie épigrammatique. Actes du colloque des 7, 8 et 9 novembre 2012 à Aix-en-Provence, eds Durbec, Y. and Trajber, F.. Hellenistica Groningana 22. Leuven, 41–58.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, W. 1907. Das literarische Porträt Alexanders des Großen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Holliday, P. J. 2002. The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hollis, D. L. 2019. ‘Mountain gloom and mountain glory: the genealogy of an idea’, Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and the Environment 26: 1038–61.Google Scholar
Hollis, D. L., and König, J. (eds) 2021. Mountain Dialogues from Antiquity to Modernity. London.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2017. ‘Foreword: before nature?’, in Schliephake 2017a, ix–xiii.Google Scholar
Honigman, S. 2003. The Septuagint and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. London.Google Scholar
Hoof, L. 2010. Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Horn, F. 2018. ‘Dying is hard to describe: metonymies and metaphors of death in the Iliad’, CQ 68: 359–83.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2015. Lykophron: Alexandra. Greek Text, Translation, Commentary, and Introduction. Oxford.Google Scholar
Horsley, G. H. R. 1981. New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity, i: A Review of the Greek Inscriptions and Papyri Published in 1976. Sydney.Google Scholar
Hose, M. 1999. ‘Post-colonial theory and Greek literature in Rome’, GRBS 40: 303–26.Google Scholar
Howley, J. A. 2014. ‘Heus tu rhetorisce: Gellius, Cicero, Plutarch, and Roman study abroad’, in Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing. Double Vision, eds Madsen, J. M. and Rees, R.. Leiden, 163–92.Google Scholar
Hoyos, D. 2006. ‘Crossing the Durance with Hannibal and Livy: the route to the pass’, Klio 88: 408–65.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. D. 2014. Environmental Problems of the Greeks and Romans: Ecology in the Ancient Mediterranean. 2nd ed. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Huitink, L., and Rood, T. 2019. Xenophon, Anabasis Book iii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1983. A Study of Daphnis and Chloe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2009a. ‘The Trojan Oration of Dio Chrysostom and ancient Homeric criticism’, in Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, eds Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin: 43–62.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2009b. Critical Moments in Classical Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R., and Jonge, C. C. (eds) 2019a. Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome. Rhetoric, Criticism and Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R., and Jonge, C. C. (eds) 2019b. ‘Introduction’, in Hunter and de Jonge (eds), 1–33.Google Scholar
Huss, W. 2001. Ägypten in hellenistischer Zeit, 332–30 v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 1995. ‘Rhythm, style, and meaning in Cicero’s prose’, CQ 45: 485–99.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2013. Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2015. ‘Appian the artist: rhythmic prose and its literary implications’, CQ 65: 788–806.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2018. Plutarch’s Rhythmic Prose. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hutton, W. 2005. Describing Greece: Landscape and Literature in the Periegesis of Pausanias. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. 2002. ‘Longinus and Caecilius: models of the sublime’, Mnemosyne 55: 259–84.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2014. Ethics after Aristotle. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Isager, J. (ed.) 2001. Foundation and Destruction: Nikopolis and Northwestern Greece. The Archaeological Evidence for the City Destructions, the Foundation of Nikopolis and the Synoecisms. Aarhus.Google Scholar
Isayev, E. 2014. ‘Polybius’s global moment and human mobility throughout ancient Italy’, in Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture, eds Pitts, M. and Versluys, M. J.. New York, 123–40.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. 1991. ‘Θεὸς Ἑρμῆς ἐπὶ Ἁδριανοῦ: La mise en scène du pouvoir impérial dans la Description de la terre habitée de Denys d’Alexandrie’, CCG 2: 43–53.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. 1981. The Political Unconscious. London.Google Scholar
Janni, P. 1984. La mappa e il periplo. Cartografia antica e spazio odologico. Rome.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. 1992. Textual Poachers. London.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. 2002. ‘Interactive audiences: the “collective intelligence” of media fans’, in The New Media Book, ed. Harries, D.. London, 157–70.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1979. ‘Vergilius cacozelus (Donatus Vita Vergilii 44)’, PLLS 2: 67–142.Google Scholar
Johnson, W., and Richter, D. (eds) 2017. The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jolivet, V. 1987. ‘Xerxes togatus: Lucullus en Campanie’, MEFRA 99: 823–46.Google Scholar
Jones, B. W. 1984. The Emperor Titus. London.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1971. Plutarch and Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1978 The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2000. ‘Nero speaking’, HSCPh 100: 453–62.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2004. ‘Multiple identities in the age of the Second Sophistic’, in Borg (ed.), 13–22.Google Scholar
Jones, H. L. 1917–32. The Geography of Strabo, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. 2001. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jonge, C. C. 2008. Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Jonge, C. C. 2014. ‘The Attic Muse and the Asian harlot: classicizing allegories in Dionysius and Longinus’, in Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World, eds Ker, J. and Pieper, C.. Leiden, 388–409.Google Scholar
Jonge, C. C. 2017. ‘Dionysius on Thucydides’, in The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides, eds Balot, R., Forsdyke, S. and Forster, E.. Oxford, 641–58.Google Scholar
Jonge, C. C. 2019. ‘Dionysius and Horace: composition in Augustan Rome’, in Hunter and de Jonge (eds), 242–66.Google Scholar
Jonge, C. C. 2021. ‘Challenging the canon of the ten Attic orators: from kanôn to canon’, in Canonisation as Innovation: Anchoring Cultural Formation in the First Millennium bc, eds Agut-Labordère, D. and Versluys, M. J.. Leiden.Google Scholar
Jung, M. 2006. Marathon und Plataiai. Zwei Perserschlachten als ‘lieux de mémoire’ im antiken Griechenland. Hypomnemata 164. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kah, D. 2012. ‘Paroikoi und Neubürger in Priene’, in Günther (ed.), 51–71.Google Scholar
Kah, D., and Scholz, P. (eds) 2004. Das hellenistische Gymnasion. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kamen, D. 2013. Status in Classical Athens. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kassel, R. 1987. Die Abgrenzung des Hellenismus in der griechischen Literaturgeschichte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Keaney, J., and Lamberton, R. (eds) 1996. Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer [Plutarch]. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Keeline, T., and Kirby, T. 2019. ‘Auceps syllabarum: a digital analysis of Latin prose rhythm’, JRS 109: 161–204.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. 2011. ‘Narrative of cultural geography in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Perceptions of the Second Sophistic and Its Times. Regards sur la Seconde Sophistique et son époque, eds Schmidt, T. S. and Fleury, P.. Phoenix Suppl. 49. Toronto, 3–22.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. 300 bc–ad 300. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1994. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kennell, N. 2013. ‘Who were the Neoi?’, in Martzavou and Papazarkadas (eds), 228–9.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. 1988–99 Posidonius, ii.i and ii.ii: The Commentary; iii: The Translation of the Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. 1989. ‘Posidonius as philosopher-historian’, in Griffin and Barnes (eds), 38–50.Google Scholar
Kienast, D. 1982. ‘Corpus Imperii. Überlegungen zum Reichsgedanken der Römer’, in Romanitas – Christianitas. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte und Literatur der römischen Kaiserzeit. Johannes Straub zum 70. Geburtstag am 18. Oktober 1982 gewidmet, ed. Wirth, G., in collaboration with K.-H. Schwarte and J. Heinrichs. Berlin, 1–17.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2007. ‘The portrait of Homer in Strabo’s Geography’, CPh 102: 363–88.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2010. Homer Between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2017a. ‘Atticism and Asianism’, in Richter and Johnson (eds), 41–66.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2017b. ‘Literary history in Imperial Greece: Dionysius’ On Ancient Orators, Plutarch’s On the Oracles of the Pythia, Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Grethlein and Rengakos (eds), 212–47.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. 1973. Homer in der zweiten Sophistik: Studien zu der Homerlektüre und dem Homerbild bei Dion von Prusa, Maximos von Tyros und Ailios Aristeides. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Knoche, U. 1952. ‘Die Augusteische Ausprägung der Dea Roma’, repr. in Römertum. Ausgewählte Aufsätze und Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1921 bis 1961, ed. Oppermann, H.. Darmstadt 1962, 359–99.Google Scholar
Koelb, J. H. 2006. The Poetics of Description: Imagined Places in European Literature. New York.Google Scholar
Koelb, J. H. 2009. ‘“This most beautiful and adorn’d world”: Nicolson’s Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory reconsidered’, Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and the Environment 16: 443–68.Google Scholar
König, A., and Whitton, C. (eds) 2018a. Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, A., and Whitton, C. (eds) 2018b. ‘Introduction’, in König and Whitton (eds), 1–34.Google Scholar
König, A., Langlands, R., and Uden, J. (eds) 2020a. Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235: Cross-Cultural Interactions. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, A., Langlands, R., and Uden, J. (eds) 2020b. ‘Introduction’, in König, Langlands and Uden (eds), 1–33.Google Scholar
König, J. 2009. Greek Literature in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
König, J. 2011. ‘Self-promotion and self-effacement in Plutarch’s Table Talk’, in The Philosopher’s Banquet. Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire, eds Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K.. Oxford, 179–203.Google Scholar
König, J. 2015. ‘Greek literature in the Roman world: introducing imperial Greek literature’, in A Companion to Greek Literature, eds Hose, M. and Schenker, D.. Chichester, 112–25.Google Scholar
König, J. 2016a. ‘Strabo’s Mountains’, in Landscapes of Value: Natural Environment and Cultural Imagination in Classical Antiquity, eds McInerney, J. and Sluiter, I.. Leiden, 46–69.Google Scholar
König, J. 2016b. ‘Re-reading Pollux: encyclopaedic structure and athletic culture in Onomasticon Book 3’, CQ 66: 298–315.Google Scholar
König, J. 2018. ‘Representations of intellectual community in Plutarch, Pliny the Younger and Aulus Gellius’, Archimède. Hors série 1: 54–67.Google Scholar
König, J., and Whitmarsh, T. (eds) 2007a. Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, J., and Whitmarsh, T. (eds) 2007b. ‘Ordering knowledge’, in König and Whitmarsh (eds), 3–39.Google Scholar
König, J., and Woolf, G. (eds) 2013a. Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, J., and Woolf, G. (eds) 2013b. ‘Encyclopaedism in the Roman Empire’, in König and Woolf (eds), 23–63.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. 2016. ‘The Romans and the world’s measure’, in Brill’s Companion to Ancient Geography. The Inhabited World in Greek and Roman Tradition, eds Bianchetti, S., Cataudella, M. R. and Gehrke, H.-J.. Leiden, 223–38.Google Scholar
Konstan, D., and Saïd, S. (eds) 2006. The Greeks on Greekness. PCPS 29. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Korenjak, M. 2000. Publikum und Redner: ihre Interaktion in der Sophistischen Rhetorik der Kaiserzeit. Zetemata 14. Munich.Google Scholar
Koumoulides, J. T. A. (ed.) 1987. Greek Connections: Essays on Culture and Diplomacy. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. 1996. ‘Exercitatio’, in Ueding (ed.), iii: Eup-Hör, 71–123.Google Scholar
Kremmydas, C., and Tempest, K. (eds) 2013. Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change. Oxford.Google Scholar
Krewet, M. 2017. ‘Polybios’ Geschichtsbild. Hellenistische Prinzipien seiner Darstellungen menschlichen Handelns’, WS 130: 89–125.Google Scholar
Kühnert, F., and Vogt, E. 2005. ‘Rhetorik’, Lexikon des Hellenismus, eds Schmitt, H. H. and Vogt, E.. Wiesbaden, 912–19.Google Scholar
Laks, A., and Schofield, M. (eds) 1995. Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. 1986. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lang, M. L. 1989. ‘Unreal conditions in Homeric narrative’, GRBS 30: 5–26.Google Scholar
Laplace, M. 2007. Le roman d’Achille Tatios: discours panégyrique et imaginaire romanesque. Bern.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. H. J. 2014. ‘The synkrisis’, in Beck (ed.), 405–16.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1989. The Historical Method of Herodotus. Toronto.Google Scholar
Laurence, R. 1999. The Roads of Roman Italy. Mobility and Cultural Change. London.Google Scholar
Laurent, J. 2008. ‘Strabon et la philosophie stoïcienne’, Archives de Philosophie 71: 111–27.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. 2008. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik. Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. 4th ed. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 2000. ‘Narrative space and the viewer in Philostratus’ Eikones’, MDAI(R) 107: 237–51.Google Scholar
Le Guen, B. (ed.) 1997. De la scène aux gradins: théâtre et représentations dramatiques après Alexandre le Grand. Toulouse.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, L. 1926. Dion de Pruse: les oeuvres d’avant l’exil. Paris.Google Scholar
Levine, A.-J. 1995. ‘The Sibylline Oracles’, in Searching the Scriptures, ii: A Feminist Commentary, ed. Schüssler Fiorenza, E.. New York, 99–108.Google Scholar
Levine, L. I. 2012. Visual Judaism in Late Antiquity: Historical Contexts of Jewish Art. New Haven.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. 1998. Philon d’Alexandrie et le langage de la philosophie. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Liddel, P. 2018. ‘Inscriptions and writing in Diodoros’ Bibliotheke’, in Hau, Meeus and Sheridan (eds), 447–69.Google Scholar
Liddel, P., and Fear, A. (eds) 2010. Historiae Mundi. Studies in Universal History. London.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. 1999. Parthenius of Nicaea: The Poetical Fragments and the Erotika Pathemata. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. 2007. The Sibylline Oracles: With Introduction, Translation, and Commentary on the First and Second Books. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. 2017. ‘Man of many voices and of much knowledge; or, in search of Strabo’s Homer’, in Dueck (ed.), 251–62.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1972. ‘Imperial expansion and moral decline in the Roman Republic’, Historia 21: 626–38.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. 1981. ‘What was the “Imperium Romanum”’, G&R 28: 53–67.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1982. U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff. History of Classical Scholarship. London.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2006. From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Louden, B. 1993. ‘Pivotal contrafactuals in Homeric epic’, CA 12: 181–93.Google Scholar
Lucarini, C. 2015. ‘I due stili asiani (Cic. “Br.” 325; “P. Artemid.”) e l’origine dell’Atticismo letterario’, ZPE 193: 11–24.Google Scholar
Lucas, D. W. 1968. Aristotle, Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luzzatto, M. T. 1983. Tragedia greca e cultura ellenistica. L’or. lii di Dione di Prusa. Bologna.Google Scholar
Ma, J. 2013. Statues and Cities: Honorific Portraits and Civic Identity in the Hellenistic World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Macdonald, E. 2015. Hannibal. A Hellenistic Life, repr. as Hannibal. The Life and Legend. New Haven.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. 2012. Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica: Engaging Homer in Late Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar
Maier, F. K. 2010. ‘“… zu vertrauten Vorstellungen führen”. Die Funktion der Geographie im didaktischen Geschichtskonzept des Polybius’, Geographia Antica 19: 47–63.Google Scholar
Maier, F. K. 2012a. ‘Learning from history para doxan. A new approach to Polybius’ manifold view of the past’, Histos 6: 144–68.Google Scholar
Maier, F. K. 2012b. ‘Überall mit dem Unerwarteten rechnen’: die Kontingenz geschichtlicher Prozesse bei Polybios. Munich.Google Scholar
Maier, F. K. 2018. ‘Past and present as paradoxon theorema in Polybius’, in Polybius and His Legacy, ed. Miltsios, N.. Berlin, 55–74.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. 1925. Nuova silloge epigrafica di Rodi e Cos. Florence.Google Scholar
Manfredi, L. I. 1999. ‘Carthaginian policy through coins’, in Phoenicians and Carthaginians in the Western Mediterranean, ed. Pisano, G.. Studia Punica 12. Rome, 69–78.Google Scholar
Mann, Chr., and Scholz, P. (eds) 2012. ‘Demokratie’ im Hellenismus: Von der Herrschaft des Volkes zur Herrschaft der Honoratioren? Die hellenistische Polis als Lebensform 2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. T. 1996. Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, i. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mari, M., and Thornton, J. (eds) 2013. Parole in movimento. Linguaggio politico e lessico storiografico in età ellenistica. Studi ellenistici 27. Pisa.Google Scholar
Marías, J. 2015. ‘To begin at the beginning. Opening speech 15th international literature festival Berlin, September 9th 2015, House of the Berliner Festspiele’ (www.literaturfestival.com/medien/texte/eroeffnungsreden/opening-of-the-15th-ilb-javier-marias-let2019s-start-at-the-beginning/view; accessed 22 September 2015).Google Scholar
Markell, P. 2003. Bound by Recognition. Princeton.Google Scholar
Martinelli, M. C. (ed.) 2009. La musa dimenticata. Aspetti dell’esperienza musicale greca in età ellenistica. Pisa.Google Scholar
Martzavou, P. 2014. ‘“Isis” et “Athènes”: épigraphie, espace et pouvoir à la basse époque hellénistique’, in Bricault and Versluys (eds), 163–91.Google Scholar
Martzavou, P., and Papazarkadas, N. (eds) 2013. Epigraphical Approaches to the Post-Classical Polis, Fourth Century bc to Second Century ad. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. 2013. Imperialism, Power, and Identity: Experiencing the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. 2014. ‘Identities in the Roman world: discrepancy, heterogeneity, hybridity and plurality’, in Roman in the Provinces: Art on the Periphery of Empire, eds Brody, L. R. and Hoffman, G. L.. Chestnut Hill, 35–59.Google Scholar
McEwen, I. K. 2003. Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Meeus, A. 2018a. ‘History’s aims and audience in the proem to Diodoros’ Bibliotheke’, in Hau, Meeus and Sheridan (eds), 149–74.Google Scholar
Meeus, A. 2018b. ‘Introduction: narrative and interpretation in the Hellenistic historians’, in Meeus (ed.), 1–22.Google Scholar
Meeus, A. (ed.) 2018c. Narrative in Hellenistic Historiography. Histos Suppl. 8. Newcastle.Google Scholar
Meister, J. B. 2012. Der Körper des Princeps. Zur Problematik eines monarchischen Körpers ohne Monarchie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Meister, K. 1975. Historische Kritik bei Polybios. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1997. ‘Physics as a virtue’, Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11: 1–34.Google Scholar
Mérot, G. 2017. ‘Un canon épistolaire? La singularité du discours Sur l’entraînement à la parole de Dion de Pruse’, in Sacré canon: autorité et marginalité en littérature, eds Lata, M. and Baudoin, A. C.. Paris, 23–39.Google Scholar
Messerschmidt, W. 2003. Prosopopoiia. Personifikationen politischen Charakters in spätklassischer und hellenistischer Kunst. Cologne.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. 2005. Inszeniertes Lesevergnügen. Das inschriftliche Epigramm und seine Rezeption bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Meyer, D., and Wirbelauer, E. 2007. ‘Rom und die Römer in griechischen Epigrammen (2. Jh. v. Chr.–1. Jh. n. Chr.)’, in Visions grecques de Rome. Griechische Blicke auf Rom, eds Freyburger, M.-L. and Meyer, D.. Paris, 319–46.Google Scholar
Migliario, E. 2012. ‘Intellettuali dei tempi nuovi: retori greci nella Roma augustea’, in Forme della memoria e dinamiche identitarie nell’antichità greco-romana, eds Franchi, E. and Proietti, G.. Trento, 111–30.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. 1987. ‘Polybius between Greece and Rome’, in Koumoulides (ed.), 1–18.Google Scholar
Miltsios, N. 2013. The Shaping of Narrative in Polybius. Berlin.Google Scholar
Miltsios, N., and Tamiolaki, M. (eds) 2018. Polybius and his Legacy. Berlin.Google Scholar
Minar, E. L., Sandbach, F. H., and Helmbold, W. C. 1961. Plutarch’s Moralia, xix. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. 2015. The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome, tr. J. Lloyd (originally published in French 1997). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Möllendorff, P. von 2013. ‘“Sie hielt ein aufgerolltes Buch in den Händen …” – Metalepse als mediales Phänomen in der Literatur der Kaiserzeit’, in Über die Grenze. Metalepse in Text- und Bildmedien des Altertums, eds Eisen, U. and von Möllendorff, P.. Berlin, 346–86.Google Scholar
Mohm, S. 1977. Untersuchungen zu den historiographischen Anschauungen des Polybios. PhD Diss. Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. 1978. ‘The career and conversion of Dio Chrysostom’, JHS 98: 79–100.Google Scholar
Molin, M. 2004. Polybe, Histoires, iii: Livre iii, texte établi par J. de Foucault, revu et traduit par E. Foulon, commenté par M. Molin. Paris.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1942. ‘Terra Marique’, JRS 32: 53–64.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. 1889. ‘Zusatz’, in Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie zu Berlin, 973–81.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G. 1973. ‘Pliny, N. H. iii 129, the Roman use of stades and the elogium of C. S. Tuditanus’, Philologus 117: 29–48.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 1998. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 2011. ‘The Miscellany and Plutarch’, in The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire, ed. Klotz, F.. Oxford, 49–73.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. V. 1992. ‘Alternatives to the epic tradition. Homer’s challenges in the Iliad’, TAPhA 122: 61–71.Google Scholar
Morson, G. S. 1994. Narrative and Freedom: the Shadows of Time. New Haven.Google Scholar
Morstein Kallet-Marx, R. 1995. From Hegemony to Empire. The Development of the Roman Imperium in the East from 148 to 62 bc. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Morton, P. 2018. ‘Diodorus Siculus’ “Slave War” narratives: writing social commentary in the Bibliotheke’, CQ 68: 534–51.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 2011. ‘Principate and system’, in Schmitz and Wiater (eds), 163–79.Google Scholar
Most, G. W., and Laks, A. (eds) 2016. Early Greek Philosophy, viii.1: Sophists. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Mülke, M. 2018. Aristobulos in Alexandria. Jüdische Bibelexegese zwischen Griechen und Ägyptern unter Ptolemaios vi. Berlin.Google Scholar
Müller, C. 2014. ‘La (dé)construction de la politeia. Citoyenneté et octroi de privilèges aux étrangers dans les démocraties hellénistiques’, Annales HSS 69: 753–75.Google Scholar
Müller, K. 1935. Die Epigramme des Antiphilos von Byzanz. Einleitende Untersuchungen, Text und Kommentar. Neue deutsche Forschungen 2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Münscher, K. 1920. Xenophon in der griechisch-römischen Literatur. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Muntz, C. E. 2017. Diodorus Siculus and the World of the Late Roman Republic. New York.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. 2004. Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Myers, M. 2011. ‘Lucan’s poetic geographies: center and periphery in civil war epic’, Brill’s Companion to Lucan, ed. Asso, P.. Leiden, 399–416.Google Scholar
Neis, R. 2013. The Sense of Sight in Rabbinic Culture: Jewish Ways of Seeing in Late Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nervegna, S. 2013. Menander in Antiquity: The Contexts of Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 1992. Ungeschehenes Geschehen: ‘Beinahe-Episoden’ im griechischen und römischen Epos von Homer bis zur Spätantike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Nestle, W. 1927. ‘Die Fabel des Menenius Agrippa’, Klio 21: 350–60.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2007. ‘Reading the allegory of the Archelaos relief’, in Art and Inscriptions in the Ancient World, eds Newby, Z. and Leader-Newby, R.. Cambridge, 156–78.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2009. ‘Absorption and erudition in Philostratus’ Imagines’, in Philostratus, eds Bowie, E. and Elsner, J.. Cambridge, 322–42.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2012. ‘The aesthetics of violence: myth and danger in Roman domestic landscapes’, ClAnt 31: 349–89.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1991. Space, Geography and Politics in the Early Roman Empire, tr. H. Leclerc. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Nicolson, M. H. 1959. Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. 2001. Philo on Jewish Identity and Culture. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 86. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. 2011. Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. 2012. Homer and the Bible in the Eyes of Ancient Interpreters. Leiden.Google Scholar
Niehoff, M. 2018. Philo of Alexandria: An Intellectual Biography. New Haven.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1997. Untimely Meditations, ed. Breazeale, D., tr. R. Hollingdale. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nijf, O. van, and Alston, R. (eds) 2011. Political Culture in the Greek City after the Classical Age. Leuven.Google Scholar
Nikiprowetzky, V. 1970. La Troisième Sibylle. Paris.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. G. 2014. ‘Morality, characterization, and individuality’, in Beck (ed.), 350–72.Google Scholar
Noël, M.-P. 1999. ‘Gorgias et l’ “invention” des γοργίεια σχήματα’, REG 112: 193–211.Google Scholar
Nora, P., and Kritzman, L. D. (eds) 1996–8. Realms of Memory. Rethinking the French Past, 3 vols. New York.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1898. Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, i. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1915. Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, i. 3rd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nünnerich-Asmus, A. 1993. ‘Straßen, Brücken und Bögen als Zeichen römischen Herrschaftsanspruchs’, in Hispania antiqua. Denkmäler der Römerzeit, eds Trillmich, W. et al. Mainz, 121–57.Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. 2009. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oldfather, C. H., et al. 1935–67. Diodorus of Sicily: The Library of History, 12 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., and Deibert, R. J. 1996. ‘Psychological biases in counterfactual thought experiments’, in Tetlock and Belkin (eds), 349–52.Google Scholar
Onians, J. 1979. Art and Thought in the Hellenistic World: The Greek World View 350–50 bc. London.Google Scholar
Ooms, S. 2019. How to Compose Great Prose: Cicero, Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Stylistic Theory in Late-Republican and Augustan Rome. PhD Diss. Leiden.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. 2011. The History Written on the Classical Body. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oudot, E. 2008. ‘Aelius Aristides and Thucydides: some remarks about the Panathenaic oration’, in Aelius Aristides: Between Greece, Rome, and the Gods, eds Harris, W. V. and Holmes, B.. Boston, 31–49.Google Scholar
Palm, J. 1955. Über Sprache und Stil des Diodoros von Sizilien. Lund.Google Scholar
Papanikolaou, D. 2008. Rhetorical Receptions of Gorgias: Hegesias and the Asianists. PhD Diss. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Papanikolaou, D. 2009. ‘The aretalogy of Isis from Maroneia and the question of Hellenistic “Asianism”’, ZPE 168: 59–70.Google Scholar
Papanikolaou, D. 2012a. ‘IG V.2, 268 (= SIG3 783) as a monument of Hellenistic prose’, ZPE 182: 137–56.Google Scholar
Papanikolaou, D. 2012b. ‘Sophistic oratory and styles in Roman Asia Minor: Hermogenes and the Tlos Sophist (TAM II.174)’, C&M 63: 119–60.Google Scholar
Parke, H. W. 1998. Sibyls and Sibylline Prophecy in Classical Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Parmeggiani, G. 2018. ‘Polybius and the legacy of fourth-century historiography’, in Miltsios and Tamiolaki (eds), 277–97.Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. 1913. ‘Die schriftstellerische Form des Pausanias’, Hermes 48: 161–233.Google Scholar
Patillon, M. 2002. Pseudo-Aelius Aristides. Arts Rhétoriques Livre II: Le discours simple. Paris.Google Scholar
Patillon, M. 2012. Corpus Rhetoricum, iv: Prolégomènes au De ideis. Hermogène, Les catégories stylistiques du discours (De ideis). Synopses des exposés sur les ideai. Paris.Google Scholar
Pausch, D. 2011. Livius und der Leser. Narrative Strukturen in ab urbe condita. Munich.Google Scholar
Pavlovskis, Z. 1973. Man in an Artificial Landscape: The Marvels of Civilization in Imperial Roman Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. 2007. ‘Translating for Ptolemy: patriotism and politics in the Greek Pentateuch’, in Jewish Perspectives on Hellenistic Rulers, eds Rajak, T., Pearce, S., Aitken, J. and Dines, J.. Berkeley, 165–81.Google Scholar
Pearce, S. (ed) 2013. The Image and Its Prohibition in Jewish Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pédech, P. 1964. La méthode historique de Polybe. Paris.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. 2012. The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1986. ‘Synkrisis in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Miscellanea Plutarchea, eds Brenk, F. E. and Gallo, I.. Ferrara, 83–96.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2002. Plutarch and History. Eighteen Studies. London.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 1993. La rhétorique de l’éloge dans le monde gréco-romain, 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 2005. Rhetoric in Antiquity, tr. W. Higgins. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pernot, L. 2017. ‘Greek and Latin rhetorical culture’, in Richter and Johnson (eds), 205–16.Google Scholar
Petrain, D. 2014. Homer in Stone: The Tabulae Iliacae in their Roman Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pettegrew, D. K. 2016. The Isthmus of Corinth: Crossroads of the Mediterranean World. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1976. History of Classical Scholarship from 1300–1850. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pieper, C. 2016. ‘Menenius Agrippa als exemplum für die frühe römische Beredsamkeit. Eine historische Spurensuche’, RhM 159: 156–90.Google Scholar
Pier, J. 2016. ‘Metalepsis’, in The Living Handbook of Narratology, eds Hühn, P. et al. Hamburg (www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/51.html; accessed 16 March 2021).Google Scholar
Pinkwart, D. 1965. Das Relief des Archelaos von Priene und die ‘Musen des Philiskos’. Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Pogorzelski, R. 2011. ‘“Orbis Romanus”: Lucan and the limits of the Roman world’, TAPhA 141: 143–70.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1986. Art in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. 2002. ‘Homer: the very idea’, Arion 10: 57–86.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. 2006. ‘Feeling classical: classicism and ancient literary criticism’, in Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, ed. Porter, J. I.. Princeton, 301–52.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. 2016. The Sublime in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Post Classicisms Collective 2020. Postclassicisms. Chicago.Google Scholar
Pothecary, S. 2005. ‘Kolossourgia. “A colossal statue of a work”’, in Dueck, Lindsay and Pothecary (eds), 5–26.Google Scholar
Potter, D. 1990. ‘Sibyls in the Greek and Roman world’, JRA 3: 471–83.Google Scholar
Prag, J., and Quinn, J. C. (eds) 2013a. The Hellenistic West: Rethinking the Ancient Mediterranean. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Prag, J., and Quinn, J. C. (eds) 2013b. ‘Introduction’, in Prag and Quinn (eds), 1–13.Google Scholar
Prandi, L. 2016. ‘Hegesias of Magnesia (142)’, in Brill’s New Jacoby.Google Scholar
Prencipe, V. 2017. ‘Impervious nature as a path to virtue: Cato in the ninth book of Bellum civile’, in Schliephake (ed.), 131–46.Google Scholar
Prendergast, C. 2019. Counterfactuals. Paths of What Might Have Been. London.Google Scholar
Pretzler, M. 2005. ‘Comparing Strabo with Pausanias: Greece in context vs. Greece in depth’, in Dueck, Lindsay and Pothecary (eds), 144–60.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O., and Giuliani, L. 2012. ‘Bild und Rede. Zum Proömium der Eikones des zweiten Philostrat’, Poetica 44: 25–79.Google Scholar
Prontera, F. 1984. ‘Prima di Strabone. Materiali per uno studio della geografia come genere letterario’, in Strabone. Contributi allo studio della personalità e dell’ opera, ed. Prontera, I. F.. Perugia, 187–256.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1987. ‘Town in country and country in town’, in Ancient Roman Villa Gardens, ed. MacDougall, E. B.. Washington, DC, 187–203.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1990. ‘Maps, lists, money, order and power’, review of C. Nicolet, L’inventaire du monde. Géographie et politique aux origines de l’empire romain, Paris 1988 (= Nicolet 1991), JRS 80: 178–82.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 2002. ‘The creation of provincial landscape: the Roman impact on Cisalpine Gaul’, in The Roman Empire in the West, eds Blagg, T. and Millett, M.. Oxford, 7–29.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 2005. ‘Romans in the Roman World’, in Galinsky (ed.), 85–105.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 2012. ‘Rivers and the geography of power’, Pallas 90: 373–87.Google Scholar
Quaß, F. 1993. Die Honoratiorenschicht in den Städten des griechischen Ostens. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Quayson, A. 2000. Postcolonialism: Theory, Practice or Process? Cambridge.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. C. 2012. ‘Postcolonialism’, in The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, eds Bagnall, R. S., Brodersen, K., Champion, C. B., Erskine, A. and Huebner, S. R.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. C. 2013. ‘Imagining the imperial Mediterranean’, in Gibson and Harrison (eds), 337–52.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A., and Talbert, R. J. A. (eds) 2010. Geography and Ethnography: Perceptions of the World in Pre-Modern Societies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Radt, S. 2002–11. Strabons Geographika. Mit Übersetzung und Kommentar, 10 vols. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Rajak, T. 2009. Translation and Survival: the Greek Bible of the Ancient Jewish Diaspora. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rajewsky, I. 2002. Intermedialität. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Rathmann, M. 2016. Diodor und seine ‘Bibliotheke’. Weltgeschichte aus der Provinz. Klio Beihefte, Neue Folge 27. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1989 [1997]. ‘Roman rulers and the philosophical adviser’, in Griffin and Barnes (eds), 233–57.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1990. ‘The antiquarian tradition. Spoils and representations of foreign armour’, in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart, 158–73.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. 1971. Courants littéraires grecs des IIe et IIIe siècles après J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1926. Kosmos und Sympathie: neue Untersuchungen über Poseidonios. Munich.Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. 2017. ‘The literary histories of the Hellenistic age’, in Grethlein and Rengakos (eds), 71–82.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 1997. ‘Posidonius and the Timaeus: off to Rhodes and back to Plato?’, CQ 47: 455–76.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Ferreira, J., Leão, D., Tröster, M., and Barata Dias, P. (eds) 2009. Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch. Coimbra.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. S. 1979. ‘Polybius’ view of the Roman empire’, PBSR 47: 1–11.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. S. 1991. ‘Imperium Romanum: empire and the language of power’, JRS 81: 1–9.Google Scholar
Richardson, L., Jr. 1992. A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Richter, D. S. 2011. Cosmopolis: Imagining Community in Late Classical Athens and the Early Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richter, D. J., and Johnson, W. (eds) 2017. The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. 1990. Hellenistic Sculpture, I: The Styles of ca. 331–200 bc. Madison.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. 2007. ‘Guides to the wor(l)d’, in König and Whitmarsh (eds), 88–107.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. 2019. Mosaics of Knowledge: Representing Information in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1930. ‘Pantomimen im griechischen Orient’, Hermes 65: 106–22.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1960. Hellenica 11/12. Paris.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1967. ‘Sur les inscriptions d’Ephèse’, RPh ser. 3, no. 4: 7–84.Google Scholar
Robert, L., and Robert, J. 1989. Claros i. Décrets hellénistiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Robert, L., and Robert, J. 1954. La Carie: histoire et géographie historique avec le recueil des inscriptions antiques, 2 vols. ParisGoogle Scholar
Robiano, P. 2018. ‘D’un tableau l’autre: parcours du discours et parcours de la poikilia dans les Tableaux de Flavius Philostrate’, REG 131: 479–520.Google Scholar
Robling, F.-H. 1992. ‘Asianismus. ii’, in Ueding (ed.), i: A–Bib, 1120–1.Google Scholar
Röllmann, B. 1910. De numeri oratorii primordiis. Münster.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. 1886. ‘Die asianische Rhetorik und die zweite Sophistik’, RhM 41: 170–90.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. 1876. Der griechische Roman und seine Vorläufer. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Roisman, J. 2005. The Rhetoric of Manhood: Masculinity in the Attic Orators. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Roller, D. W. 2014. The Geography of Strabo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Romilly, J. de 1975. Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Romm, J. S. 1992. The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought: Geography, Exploration, and Fiction. Princeton.Google Scholar
Romm, J. S. 2006. ‘Herodotus and the natural world’, in The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, eds Dewald, C. and Marincola, J.. Cambridge, 178–91.Google Scholar
Rood, T. 2018. ‘Geographical and historical patterning in Diodorus Siculus’, in Meeus (ed.), 23–68.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, R. 1989. ‘Imperialist nostalgia’, Representations 26: 107–22.Google Scholar
Rosamilia, E. 2014. ‘Biblioteche a Rodi all’epoca di Timachidas’, ASNP, Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 5: 325–62.Google Scholar
Roseman, C. H. 2005. ‘Reflections of philosophy: Strabo and geographical sources’, in Dueck, Lindsay and Pothecary (eds), 27–41.Google Scholar
Rosen, K. 1987. ‘Ehrendekrete, Biographie und Geschichtsschreibung. Zum Wandel der Polis im frühen Hellenismus’, Chiron 17: 277–92.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, G. D. 2005. The World Hitler Never Made. Alternate History and the Memory of Nazism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roskam, G., De Pourcq, M., and van der Stockt, L. (eds) 2012. The Lash of Ambition. Plutarch, Imperial Greek Literature and the Dynamics of Philotimia. Leuven.Google Scholar
Roth, P. 1986. The Counterlife. New York.Google Scholar
Rothe, S. 1989. Kommentar zu ausgewählten Sophistenviten des Philostratos: die Lehrstuhlinhaber in Athen und Rom. Berlin.Google Scholar
Roveri, A. 1982. ‘Tyche bei Polybios’, in Polybios, eds Stiewe, K. and Holzberg, N.. Wege der Forschung 347. Darmstadt, 297–326.Google Scholar
Rubincam, C. 1987. ‘The organisation and composition of Diodorus’ Bibliotheke’, EMC 31: 313–28.Google Scholar
Rubincam, C. 1989. ‘Cross-references in the Bibliotheke Historike of Diodoros’, Phoenix 43: 39–61.Google Scholar
Rubincam, C. 1997. ‘The organisation of material in Graeco-Roman world histories’, in Pre-Modern Encyclopaedic Texts: Proceedings of the Second COMERS Congress, Groningen, 1–4 July 1996, ed. Binkley, P.. Leiden, 127–36.Google Scholar
Rudd, G. 2007. Greenery: Ecocritical Readings of Late Medieval English Literature. Manchester.Google Scholar
Runia, D. 1990. Exegesis and Philosophy. Studies on Philo of Alexandria. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Runia, D. 2012. Philo of Alexandria: an Annotated Bibliography, 1997–2006. Leiden.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1981. Criticism in Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1989. ‘Greek criticism of the empire’, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, i: Classical Criticism, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge, 297–329.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1992. Dio Chrysostom, Orations vii, xii and xxxvi. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 2001. Quintilian, The Orator’s Education Books 9–10. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 1998 Canons of Style in the Antonine Age: Idea-Theory in Its Literary Context. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sacks, K. S. 1990. Diodorus Siculus and the First Century. Princeton.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. 2006. ‘The rewriting of the Athenian past: from Isocrates to Aelius Aristides’, in Konstan and Saïd (eds), 47–60.Google Scholar
Sasse, J. 1979. Entropie und Wahrscheinlichkeit – Untersuchungen zum Konzept einer elementaren Einführung des Entropiebegriffs auf mikrophysikalischer Basis. Osnabrück.Google Scholar
Scardigli, B. (ed.) 1995. Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar
Scardino, C. 2018. ‘Polybius and fifth-century historiography: continuity and diversity in the presentation of historical deeds’, in Miltsios and Tamiolaki (eds), 299–321.Google Scholar
Schippers, A. M. 2019. Dionysius and Quintilian: Imitation and Emulation in Greek and Latin Literary Criticism. PhD Diss. Leiden.Google Scholar
Schirren, T. 2009. ‘Sophistik und Philologie: Hat das Subversive auch Methode?’, in Was ist eine philologische Frage? Beiträge zur Erkundung einer theoretischen Einstellung, ed. Schwindt, J. P.. Frankfurt am Main, 112–36.Google Scholar
Schlachter, A. 1927. Der Globus. Seine Entstehung und Verwendung in der Antike nach den literarischen Quellen und den Darstellungen in der Kunst, herausgegeben von F. Gisinger. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schlegel, F. 1974 [1802]. Kritische Ausgabe seiner Werke: Charakteristiken und Kritiken ii, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Schliephake, C. (ed.) 2017a. Ecocriticism, Ecology, and the Cultures of Antiquity. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Schliephake, C. (ed.) 2017b. ‘Introduction’, in Schliephake (ed.), 1–15.Google Scholar
Schliephake, C. (ed.) 2020. The Environmental Humanities and the Ancient World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schlosser, J. A. 2020 Herodotus in the Anthropocene. Chicago.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. 1887–97. Der Atticismus in seinen Hauptvertretern von Dionysius von Halikarnass bis auf den zweiten Philostratus, 5 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Hofner, S. (ed.) 2016. Raum-Ordnung. Raum und soziopolitische Ordnungen im Altertum. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. 1997. Bildung und Macht. Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Zetemata 97. Munich.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. 2004. ‘Alciphron’s letters as a sophistic text’, in Borg (ed.), 87–104.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. 2007. ‘Die Erfindung des klassischen Athen in der zweiten Sophistik’, in Bilder der Antike, eds Steiner-Weber, A., Schmitz, T. A. and Laureys, M.. Super alta perennis 1. Göttingen, 71–88.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. 2011a. ‘The image of Athens in Diodorus Siculus’, in Schmitz and Wiater (eds), 235–51.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. 2011b. ‘The Second Sophistic’, in The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, ed. Peachin, M.. Oxford, 304–16.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. 2014. ‘Plutarch and the Second Sophistic’, in Beck (ed.), 32–42.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. 2017. ‘Professionals of paideia? The sophists as performers’, in Johnson and Richter (eds), 169–80.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A., and Wiater, N. (eds) 2011a. The Struggle for Identity: Greeks and Their Past in the First Century bce. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A., and Wiater, N. (eds) 2011b. ‘Introduction: approaching Greek identity’, in Schmitz and Wiater (eds), 15–45.Google Scholar
Schmitzer, U. 2008. ‘“Oligostichicus Caesar.” Das Bild des Augustus und seines Hauses in der Anthologia Palatina’, in Augustus – Der Blick von außen: Die Wahrnehmung des Kaisers in den Provinzen des Reiches und in den Nachbarstaaten, eds Kreikenbom, D. et al. Wiesbaden, 15–28.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. 1935. ‘Miliarium’, RE Suppl. vi, 395–431.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1999. The Stoic Idea of the City. New ed. with added foreword and epilogue. Chicago.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2012. ‘Antiochus on social virtue’, in Sedley (ed.), 173–87.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (ed.) 2013. Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2003. ‘Philodemus and the decentralisation of philosophy’, Cronache Ercolanesi 33: 31–41.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2009. ‘Philosophy in the Artemidorus papyrus’, in Intorno al Papiro di Artemidoro, i: Contesto Culturale, Lingua e Stile, eds Gallazzi, C., Kramer, B. and Settis, S.. Milan, 29–53.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (ed.) 2012. The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Segre, M. 1935. ‘Epigraphica’, RFIC 63: 214–25.Google Scholar
Seibert, J. 1993. Forschungen zu Hannibal. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Seland, T. (ed.) 2014. Reading Philo: A Handbook to Philo of Alexandria. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Sessions, G. 1981. ‘Shallow and deep ecology: a review of the philosophical literature’, in Ecological Consciousness: Essays from the Earthday x Colloquium, University of Denver, April 21–24, 1980, eds Schultz, R. and Hughes, J. D.. Washington, DC, 391–462.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 2010. Peripatetic Philosophy, 200 bc to ad 200: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sheridan, B. 2010. ‘Diodorus’ reading of Polybius’ universalism’, in Liddel and Fear (eds), 41–55.Google Scholar
Sherk, R. K. 1963. ‘Caesar and Mytilene’, in GRBS 4: 145–53.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. S. 1980. The Roman Citizenship. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shewring, W. H. 1931. ‘Prose-rhythm and the comparative method’, CQ 31: 12–25.Google Scholar
Shewring, W. H. 1934. ‘Platonic influence in Lucian’s “clausulae”’, Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 54: 814–16.Google Scholar
Shorrock, R. 2011. The Myth of Paganism: Nonnus, Dionysus and the World of Late Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Shuckburgh, E. S. 1908–9. The Letters of Cicero. London.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. 1996. ‘Dio of Prusa and the Flavian dynasty’, CQ 46: 447–56.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 1997. The Epigrams of Philodemos. Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Siegert, F. 2016. Einleitung in die hellenistisch-jüdische Literatur. Apokrypha, Pseudepigrapha und Fragmente verlorener Autorenwerke. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sistakou, E. 2007. ‘Glossing Homer: Homeric exegesis in early third century epigram’, in Bing and Bruss (eds), 391–408.Google Scholar
Smith, A. C. 2011. Polis and Personification in Classical Athenian Art. Leiden.Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. 1995. ‘A new look at the canon of the ten Attic orators’, Mnemosyne 48: 66–79.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. 1991. Hellenistic Sculpture. A Handbook. London.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. 2007. Greek Identity and the Athenian Past in Chariton: The Romance of Empire. Groningen.Google Scholar
Somers, M. 1994. ‘The narrative constitution of identity: a relational and network approach’, Theory and Society 23: 605–49.Google Scholar
Sonnabend, H. 2005. ‘Zwischen Fortschritt und Zerstörung: Mensch und Umwelt in der Antike’, in Physik/Mechanik, ed. Schürmann, A.. Geschichte der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften in der Antike 3. Stuttgart, 118–28.Google Scholar
Spanoudakis, K. (ed) 2014. Nonnus of Panopolis in Context: Poetry and Cultural Milieu in Late Antiquity with a Section on Nonnus and the Modern World. Berlin.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. J. S. 2012. Greece and the Augustan Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2010. Roman Landscape: Culture and Identity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spina, L. 1989. ‘Il racconto di un racconto. Egesia di Magnesia in Dionigi d’Alicarnasso, de comp. verb. vi 18.25–27’, Vichiana 18: 333–40.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. 1988. ‘Can the subaltern speak?’ in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, eds Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L.. Chicago, 271–316.Google Scholar
Squire, J. C. 1999. Wenn Napoleon bei Waterloo gewonnen hätte – und andere abwegige Geschichten. Munich.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2009. Image and Text in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2011. The Iliad in a Nutshell: Visualizing Epic on the Tabulae Iliacae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2013a. ‘Apparitions apparent: ekphrasis and the parameters of vision in the Elder Philostratus’s Imagines’, Helios 40: 97–140.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2013b. ‘Embodied ambiguities on the Prima Porta Augustus’, Art History 36: 242–79.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2015. ‘Corpus imperii: verbal and visual figurations of the Roman “body politic”’, Word & Image 31: 305–30.Google Scholar
Staab, G. 2004. ‘Athenfreunde unter Verdacht: der erste Asianist Hegesias aus Magnesia zwischen Rhetorik und Geschichtsschreibung’, ZPE 148: 127–50.Google Scholar
Stefec, R. S. 2016. Flavii Philostrati Vitae Sophistarum. Oxford.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. 1964. ‘Gattungen und Epochen der griechischen Literatur in der Sicht Quintilians’, Hermes 92: 454–66.Google Scholar
Stella, L. A. 1949. Cinque poeti dell’ Antologia Palatina. Bologna.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. 2019. Between Greece and Babylonia: Hellenistic Intellectual History in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. 1990. Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. New Haven.Google Scholar
Stewart, O. 2017. ‘“I will speak … with my whole person in ecstasy”: instrumentality and independence in the Sibylline Oracles’, in Sibyls, Scriptures, and Scrolls: John Collins at Seventy, ii, eds Baden, J., Najman, H. and Tigchelaar, E.. Leiden, 1232–46.Google Scholar
Stockt, L. 2014. ‘Compositional methods in the Lives’, in Beck (ed.), 321–32.Google Scholar
Stray, C. 2015. ‘A teutonic monster in Oxford: the making of Fraenkel’s Agamemnon’, in Classical Commentaries, eds Krauss, C. and Stray, C.. Oxford, 39–57.Google Scholar
Struck, P. 2004. Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton.Google Scholar
Sulimani, I. 2011. Diodorus’ Mythistory and the Pagan Mission: Historiography and Culture-heroes in the First Pentad of the Bibliotheke. Leiden.Google Scholar
Susemihl, F. 1891–2. Geschichte der griechischen Litteratur in der Alexandrinerzeit, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1989. ‘Plutarch: chance, providence and history’, AJP 110: 272–302.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1996. Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World ad 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (ed.) 2000. Dio Chrysostom. Politics, Letters, and Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 2004. ‘Bilingualism and biculturalism in Antonine Rome. Apuleius, Fronto, and Gellius’, in The Worlds of Aulus Gellius, eds Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A.. Oxford, 3–40.Google Scholar
Tacoma, L. E., and Tybout, R. A. 2016. ‘Moving epigrams: migration and mobility in the Greek east’, in Migration and Mobility in the Early Roman Empire, eds de Ligt, L. and Tacoma, L. E.. Studies in Global Social History 23. Leiden, 345–89.Google Scholar
Tait, J. G., and Preaux, C. (eds) 1955. Greek Ostraca in the Bodleian Library at Oxford, ii: Ostraca of the Roman and Byzantine Periods. London.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 2010. ‘Another look at Tyche in Plutarch’s Aemilius Paullus-Timoleon’, Historia 59: 448–61.Google Scholar
Tavernini, N. 1953. Dal libro decimo dell’Institutio Oratoria alle fonti tecnico-metodologiche di Quintiliano. Turin.Google Scholar
Tellenbach, G. 1994. ‘Ungeschehene Geschichte und ihre heuristische Funktion’, HZ 258: 297–316.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., and Belkin, A. (eds) 1996. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics. Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. 2019. Polis Histories, Collective Memories and the Greek World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thommen, L. 2012. An Environmental History of Ancient Greece and Rome, tr. P. Hill. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Titchener, F. B. 2014. ‘Fate and Fortune’, in Beck (ed.), 479–87.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. (ed.) 2001. Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar
Touloumakos, J. 1971. Zum Geschichtsbewußtsein der Griechen in der Zeit der römischen Herrschaft. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. B. 1997. ‘Philosophical sermons: the Dialexeis of Maximus of Tyre’, ANRW 2.34.3, 1945–76.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. B. 2007. Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Trevisan, R. 2010. ‘Un’ eterogenea descrizione del mondo: i libri i–v della Biblioteca Storica di Diodoro Siculo’, in Linguaggi del Potere, Poteri del Linguaggio, eds Bona, E. and Curnis, M.. Alessandria, 265–88.Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. 2019. Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. A. 2010. ‘The passer-by in archaic and classical epigram’, in Archaic and Classical Epigram, eds Baumbach, M., Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I.. Cambridge, 42–60.Google Scholar
Ueding, G. (ed.) 1992–2015. Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, 12 vols. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Usener, H. 1889. Dionysii Halicarnassensis librorum de imitatione reliquiae epistulaeque criticae duae. Bonn.Google Scholar
Usher, M. D. 2020. Plato’s Pigs and Other Ruminations: Ancient Guides to Living with Nature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Usher, S. 1974. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, The Critical Essays, i. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Usher, S. 1985. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, The Critical Essays, ii. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Valgimigli, M. 1912. La critica letteraria di Dione Crisostomo. Bologna.Google Scholar
Vanacker, W., and Zuiderhoek, A. (eds) 2017. Imperial Identities in the Roman World. London.Google Scholar
VanderKam, J. 2018. Jubilees, 2 vols. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Vatri, A. 2020. ‘The nature and perception of Attic prose rhythm’, CPh 115: 467–85.Google Scholar
Versluys, M. J. 2017. Visual Style and Constructing Identity in the Hellenistic World: Nemrud Dağ and Commagene under Antiochos i. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1976. Le pain et le cirque: sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Vössing, K. (ed.) 2002. Biographie und Prosopographie. Internationales Kolloquium zum 65. Geburtstag von A. R. Birley. Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Vogt, J. 1929. ‘Orbis Romanus, ein Beitrag zum Sprachgebrauch und zur Vorstellung des römischen Imperialismus’, repr. in Orbis. Ausgewählte Schriften zur Geschichte des Altertums, eds Taeger, F. and Christ, K.. Freiburg 1960, 151–71.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. M. 2008. Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City. Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. 1992. Dramaturgie des Zufalls. Tyche und Handeln in der Komödie Menanders. Munich.Google Scholar
Volkmann, R. 1853. De Oraculis Sibyllinis dissertatio: supplementum editionis a Friedliebio exhibitae. PhD Diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Vretska, K. 1976. C. Sallustius Crispus, De Catilinae coniuratione, 2 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1948. ‘The geography of Polybius’, repr. in Walbank 2002, 31–52.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1957. A Historical Commentary on Polybius, i. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1972. ‘Some structural problems: time and place’, in Polybius. Sather Classical Lectures 42. Berkeley, 97–129.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1975. ‘Symploke. Its role in Polybius’ Histories’, YClS 24: 197–212.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1993. ‘Η ΤΩΝ ΟΛΩΝ ΕΛΠΙΣ and the Antigonids’, repr. in Walbank 2002, 127–36.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 2002. Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World. Essays and Reflections. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 2007. ‘Fortune (tychē) in Polybius’, in A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, ii, ed. Marincola, J.. London, 349–55.Google Scholar
Waldis, J. 1920. Sprache und Stil der großen griechischen Inschrift vom Nemrud-Dagh in Kommagene (Nordsyrien). Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Waldmann, H. 1973. Die kommagenischen Kultreformen unter König Mithradates i. Kallinikos und seinem Sohne Antiochus i. Leiden.Google Scholar
Walker, S., and Cameron, A. (eds) 1989. The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1998a. ‘Mutatio morum: the idea of a cultural revolution’, in The Roman Cultural Revolution, eds Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A.. Cambridge, 3–21.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1998b. ‘To be Roman, go Greek: thoughts on Hellenization at Rome’, BICS 71: 79–91.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. J. 1996. ‘Flamininus and the propaganda of liberation’, Historia 45: 345–63.Google Scholar
Walter, J. 2017. ‘Poseidon’s wrath and the end of Helike: notions about the anthropogenic character of disasters in antiquity’, in Schliephake (ed.), 31–43.Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und res publica. Zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Walters, B. 2020. The Deaths of the Republic: Imagery of the Body Politic in Ciceronian Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Warf, B., and Arias, S. (eds) 2009. The Spatial Turn. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge Studies in Human Geography 26. London.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2007. ‘Diogenes Laertius, biographer of philosophy’, in König and Whitmarsh (eds), 133–49.Google Scholar
Weaire, G. 2002. ‘The relationship between Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ De imitatione and Epistula ad Pompeium’, CPh 97: 351–9.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2006. ‘The Imagines as a fictional text, ekphrasis, apatê and illusion’, in Le défi de l’art. Philostrate, Callistrate et l’image sophistique, eds Costantini, M., Graziani, F. and Rolet, S.. Rennes: 113–36.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2012. ‘The nature and representation of competition in pantomime and mime’, in Coleman and Nelis-Clément (eds), 221–60.Google Scholar
Webster, J., and Cooper, N. (eds) 1996. Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives. Leicester.Google Scholar
Weißenberger, M. 2002. ‘Das Imperium Romanum in den Proömien dreier griechischer Historiker: Polybios, Dionysios von Halikarnassos und Appian’, RhM N.F. 145: 262–81.Google Scholar
Weißenberger, M. 2012. Review of Wiater 2011, Gnomon 84: 588–91.Google Scholar
Welch, K. E. 2006. ‘Domi militaeque: Roman domestic aesthetics and war booty in the republic’, in Representations of War in Ancient Rome, eds Dillon, S. and Welch, K. E.. Cambridge, 91–161.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1997. The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry and Myth. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1999. ‘The invention of Homer’, CQ 49: 364–82.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 2010. The Making of the Iliad: Disquisition and Analytical Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
White, L., Jr. 1967. ‘The historical roots of our ecologic crisis’, Science 155: 1203–7.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2001a. Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2001b. ‘“Greece is the world”: exile and identity in the Second Sophistic’, in Goldhill (ed.), 269–305.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2005. The Second Sophistic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2008. The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (ed.) 2010a. Local Knowledge and Microidentities in the Imperial Greek World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2010b. ‘Thinking Local’, in Whitmarsh (ed.), 11–16.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2011. ‘Greek poets and Roman patrons in the late Republic and early empire’, in Schmitz and Wiater (eds), 197–212.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2013a. Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2013b. ‘The “invention of fiction”’, in Whitmarsh 2013a, 11–34.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2013c. ‘Politics and identity in Ezekiel’s Exagoge’, in Whitmarsh 2013a, 211–27.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2013d, ‘Adventures of the Solymoi’, in Whitmarsh 2013a, 228–47.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2017, ‘Greece: Hellenistic and early imperial continuities’, in Johnson and Richter (eds), 11–24.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2020. Achilles Tatius. Leucippe and Clitophon. Books i–ii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T., and Thomson, S. 2013. The Romance between Greece and the East. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2006a. ‘Geschichte als imaginäres Museum. Zum Geschichtsmodell in Diodors Bibliotheke’, WJA 30: 59–85.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2006b. ‘Geschichtsschreibung und Kompilation. Diodors historiographische Arbeitsmethode und seine Vorstellungen von zeitgemäßer Geschichtsschreibung’, RhM 149: 248–71.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2011. The Ideology of Classicism: Language, History, and Identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2014a. ‘Hellenistische Rhetorik’, in Zimmermann and Rengakos (eds), 860–86.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2014b. Dionysius von Halikarnass. Römische Frühgeschichte, i: Bücher 1 bis 3. Eingeleitet, übersetzt und kommentiert. BGL 75. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2016. ‘Shifting endings, ambiguity and deferred closure in Polybius’ Histories’, in Knowing Future Time in and through Historiography, ed. Lianeri, A.. Berlin, 243–65.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2017. ‘The aesthetics of truth. Narrative and historical understanding in Polybius’ Histories’, in Truth and History in the Ancient World. Pluralising the Past, eds Ruffell, I. and Hau, L. I.. London, 202–25.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2018a. Dionysius von Halikarnass. Römische Frühgeschichte, ii: Bücher 4 bis 6. Eingeleitet, übersetzt und kommentiert. BGL 85. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2018b. ‘Documents and narrative: reading the Roman-Carthaginian treaties in Polybius’ Histories’, in Miltsios and Tamiolaki (eds), 131–65.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2018c. ‘Getting over Athens: re-writing Hellenicity in the Early Roman History of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, in Canevaro and Gray (eds), 209–35.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. 2019. ‘Experiencing the past: language, time, and historical consciousness in Dionysian criticism’, in Hunter and de Jonge (eds), 56–82.Google Scholar
Wiemer, H.-U. 2016. ‘Römische Aristokraten oder griechische Honoratioren? Kontext und Adressaten der Verhaltenslehre des Stoikers Panaitios’, Chiron 46: 1–45.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, U. 1900a. ‘Asianismus und Atticismus’, Hermes 35: 1–52.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, U. 1900b. ‘Lesefrüchte lx’, Hermes 35: 536–42.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, U. 1902. Griechisches Lesebuch. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, U. 1922. Pindaros. Berlin.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Winston, D. 1990. ‘Judaism and hellenism: hidden tensions in Philo’s thought’, StudPhilon 2: 1–19.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. 1982. ‘Cicero and the Silver Age’, in Éloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron, eds Stroh, W. and Ludwig, W.. Geneva, 237–74.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. 1983. ‘Declamation, Greek and Latin’, in Ars Rhetorica antica e nuova. Genoa, 57–76.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. 1988. ‘Introduction’, in Sopatros the Rhetor. Studies in the Text of the Διαίρεσις Ζητημάτων, eds Innes, D. and Winterbottom, M.. London, 1–20.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. 2011. ‘On ancient prose rhythm: the story of the Dichoreus’, in Culture in Pieces. Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons, eds Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R.. Oxford, 262–76.Google Scholar
Woelk, D. 1966. Agatharchides von Knidos, Über das Rote Meer. Übersetzung und Kommentar. Bamberg.Google Scholar
Wörrle, M. 1995. ‘Vom tugendsamen Jüngling zum “gestreßten” Euergeten. Überlegungen zum Bürgerbild hellenistischer Ehrendekrete’, in Wörrle and Zanker (eds), 241–50.Google Scholar
Wörrle, M., and Zanker, P. (eds) 1995. Stadtbild und Bürgerbild im Hellenismus. Munich.Google Scholar
Woerther, F. 2015. Caecilius de Calè-Actè. Fragments et témoignages. Paris.Google Scholar
Wolf, W. 2005. ‘Metalepsis as a transgeneric and transmedial phenomenon. A case study of the possibilities of “exporting” narratological concepts’, in Narratology beyond Literary Criticism. Mediality, Disciplinarity, eds Meister, J. C., Kindt, T. and Schernus, W.. Berlin, 83–107.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 2000 Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. 2006. ‘Playing games with Greeks: one Roman on Greekness’, in Konstan and Saïd (eds), 162–92.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. 1975. ‘Le développement du style asiatique pendant l’époque hellénistique’, REG 88: 94–104.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. 1987. Hermogenes’ On Types of Style. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. 1994. ‘The canon of the ten Attic orators’, in Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action, ed. Worthington, I.. London, 244–63.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. 1999. Dinarchus, Hyperides, edited and translated. Greek Orators 2. Warminster.Google Scholar
Wright, W. C. 1921. Philostratus, Lives of the Sophists; Eunapius, Lives of the Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wyss, B., Hirsch-Luipold, R., and Hirschi, S.-J. (eds) 2017. Sophisten in Hellenismus und Kaiserzeit. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Yarrow, L. M. 2006. Historiography at the End of the Republic. Provincial Perspectives on Roman Rule. Oxford.Google Scholar
Young, R. J. C. 1990. White Mythologies. London.Google Scholar
Young, R. J. C. 1995. Colonial Desire: Hybridity Theory, Culture and Race. London.Google Scholar
Young, R. J. C. 2001. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Chichester.Google Scholar
Ypsilanti, M. 2010. ‘Deserted Delos: a motif of the Anthology and its poetic and historical background’, GRBS 50: 63–85.Google Scholar
Ypsilanti, M. 2018. The Epigrams of Crinagoras of Mytilene: Introduction, Text, Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. 2011. Plato, Phaedrus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zangara, A. 2007. Voir l’histoire: théories anciennes du récit historique, IIe siècle avant J.-C.–IIe siècle après J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. 2014. Designing for Luxury on the Bay of Naples: Villas and Landscapes (c. 100 bce–79 ce). Oxford.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 2001. ‘Visions and revisions of Homer’, in Goldhill (ed.), 195–268.Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. 1952. ‘Polybios’, RE xxi, 1440–578.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B., and Rengakos, A. (eds) 2011. Handbuch der griechischen Literatur der Antike, i: Die Literatur der archaischen und klassischen Zeit. HdA vii.1. Munich.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B., and Rengakos, A. (eds) 2014. Handbuch der griechischen Literatur der Antike, ii: Die Literatur der klassischen und hellenistischen Zeit. HdA vii.2. Munich.Google Scholar
Zinserling, G. 1959–60. ‘Studien zu den Historiendarstellungen der römischen Republik’, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 9: 403–48.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, A. 1992. The Temples of Mid-Republican Rome and their Historical and Topographical Context. Rome.Google Scholar
Zucker, F. 1956. ‘Der Stil des Gorgias nach seiner inneren Form’, Sitzungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1: 3–19.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Jason König, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Nicolas Wiater, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030878.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Jason König, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Nicolas Wiater, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030878.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Jason König, University of St Andrews, Scotland, Nicolas Wiater, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Late Hellenistic Greek Literature in Dialogue
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030878.015
Available formats
×