Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations and Formatting
- Introduction: The Problem of Irish Royalism
- 1 Memory and Merit: The Many Incarnations of Lord Inchiquin
- 2 Memory and Catholicism: Lord Taaffe and the Duke of Lorraine Negotiations
- 3 The Crisis of the Church: John Bramhall
- 4 Duty, Faith, and Fraternity: Father Peter Talbot
- 5 Duty, Faith, and Fraternity: Thomas, Richard, and Gilbert Talbot
- 6 Honour, Dishonour, and Court Culture: Lord Taaffe
- 7 Information, Access, and Court Culture: Daniel O'Neill
- 8 ‘Patron of Us All’: The Marquis of Ormond
- Conclusions: Deliverance and Debts: The Legacy of Exile
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - Duty, Faith, and Fraternity: Thomas, Richard, and Gilbert Talbot
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations and Formatting
- Introduction: The Problem of Irish Royalism
- 1 Memory and Merit: The Many Incarnations of Lord Inchiquin
- 2 Memory and Catholicism: Lord Taaffe and the Duke of Lorraine Negotiations
- 3 The Crisis of the Church: John Bramhall
- 4 Duty, Faith, and Fraternity: Father Peter Talbot
- 5 Duty, Faith, and Fraternity: Thomas, Richard, and Gilbert Talbot
- 6 Honour, Dishonour, and Court Culture: Lord Taaffe
- 7 Information, Access, and Court Culture: Daniel O'Neill
- 8 ‘Patron of Us All’: The Marquis of Ormond
- Conclusions: Deliverance and Debts: The Legacy of Exile
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Whosoever betrayes his King, will betraye his brother.
Father Peter Talbot to the Marquis of Ormond,
3 February 1655/6, Antwerp.
Peter Talbot was not the only one of his brethren to have conducted this sort of moral, spiritual, and political arithmetic during the course of the exile. Nor was he the only one of his brothers to have been variously encouraged, ignored, or condemned by Charles II's court in exile, despite great utility, by virtue of perceived duplicity or untrustworthiness. Many of the same attributes which had made Peter Talbot such an appealing, if not wholly trustworthy intermediary within Catholic Europe were present in his brothers, who shared similar connections with the collegiate networks, monasteries, ambassadors, and soldiery of Europe. Unfortunately, their greater degree of removal from Charles II's court and their relative inconsequence in the shaping of politics among the exiles makes the salvaging of their affairs and allegiances during this period far more difficult. Indeed, Peter's prolific correspondence with the exiled Court and numerous publications throughout the 1650s, in addition to the archival expansion generated by later interest in his beatification, has made him the far more accessible of the many brothers. Equally obstructive is the nature of those remaining brothers’ activities and the secrecy of their affairs during this period. As will be shown, Thomas's flitting throughout France, Italy, and England during this period with little correspondence to track his whereabouts left his movements open to rumour and speculation (much of it negative).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The King's IrishmenThe Irish in the Exiled Court of Charles II, 1649-1660, pp. 158 - 180Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2014