Book contents
- The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court
- The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Cases
- Part I The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court
- Part II Debates and Challenges to the Judicial Role
- 4 Dismantling the Diversity Deficit
- 5 Technology and the Judicial Role
- 6 Emotion Work as Judicial Work
- 7 The Persistent Pejorative
- Part III The Judiciary as a Collective
- Part IV Perceptions
- Index
5 - Technology and the Judicial Role
from Part II - Debates and Challenges to the Judicial Role
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2021
- The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court
- The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Cases
- Part I The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court
- Part II Debates and Challenges to the Judicial Role
- 4 Dismantling the Diversity Deficit
- 5 Technology and the Judicial Role
- 6 Emotion Work as Judicial Work
- 7 The Persistent Pejorative
- Part III The Judiciary as a Collective
- Part IV Perceptions
- Index
Summary
Technology is often seen as having transformational capacity to improve societal institutions, and the judiciary has not been an exception to this trend. For a number of years, courts around the world have invested in digital uplift projects. Beyond the routine use of technology to improve judicial systems, which is widely accepted and largely self-explanatory, many jurisdictions are increasingly investigating more sophisticated applications. Governments and courts are asking whether and to what extent machine learning techniques and other artificial intelligence applications should play a role in assisting tribunals and judiciary in decision making. In this chapter, we ask how these new uses of technology might, in turn, impact judicial values and judges’ own sense of themselves, and even transform the judicial role in contemporary societies. We do this through a focused examination of core judicial values, namely transparency and accountability, independence, impartiality, diversity and efficiency and how they may be either supported or undermined by increasing technologization.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Judge, the Judiciary and the CourtIndividual, Collegial and Institutional Judicial Dynamics in Australia, pp. 116 - 142Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
- 6
- Cited by