Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:30:06.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2024

Shin-yi Peng
Shin-yi Peng
Affiliation:
National Tsing Hua University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
International Economic Law in the Era of Datafication , pp. 244 - 259
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Aaronson, Susan Ariel and Leblond, Patrick, “Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and Its Implications for the WTO” (2018) 21(2) Journal of International Economic Law 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACCC, “Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report” (July 26, 2019).Google Scholar
ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority), “Supporting Australian Stories on Our Screen: Options Paper” (March 2020).Google Scholar
Ala’i, Padideh, “From the Periphery to the Center? The Evolving WTO Jurisprudence on Transparency and Good Governance” (2008) 11(4) Journal of International Economic Law 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemanno, Alberto, “Is There a Role for Cost–Benefit Analysis beyond the Nation-State? Lessons from International Regulatory Co-operation” in Livermore, Michael A. and Revesz, Richard L. (eds), The Globalization of Cost–Benefit Analysis in Environmental Policy (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Allen, Henry et al., “Media Pluralism: What Matters for Governance and Regulation?” (2017) 30(2) Journal of Media Economics 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Robert D. et al., “Competition Policy, Trade and the Global Economy” World Trade Organization Working Paper (2018).Google Scholar
APEC, “Privacy Framework” (2017).Google Scholar
APEC, “Study on APEC’s Non-binding Principles for Domestic Regulation of the Services Sector” (2021).Google Scholar
Arner, Douglas W. et al., “The Future of Data-Driven Finance and Regtech: Lessons from EU Big Bang II” (2020) 25 Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance 245.Google Scholar
Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), “Australia-Singapore Digital Economy Agreement, Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties” (September 25, 2020).Google Scholar
Australian Fair Trade & Investment Network, “Submission to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade on the Plurilateral Negotiations on Trade-Related Aspects of Electronic Commerce” (February 2020).Google Scholar
AVIA (Asia Video Industry Association), “OTT TV Policies in Asia” (2018).Google Scholar
Baccarne, Bastiaan et al., “The Television Struggle: An Assessment of Over-the-Top Television Evolutions in a Cable Dominant Market” (2013) 92(4) Communications & Strategies 43.Google Scholar
Baiker, Laura et al., “Services Domestic Regulation: Locking in Good Regulatory Practices” WTO Working Paper ERSD-2021-14 (September 17, 2021).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics, and the Future of Work (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Bambauer, Jane, “Is Data Speech?” (2014) 66 Stanford Law Review 57.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris, Television, Globalization and Cultural Identities (Open University Press 2000).Google Scholar
Batura, Olga, Universal Service in WTO and EU Law: Liberalization and Social Regulation in Telecommunications (Springer 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Stuart M., Telecommunications Law and Policy (Carolina Academic Press 2012).Google Scholar
Benjamin, Stuart M. and Speta, James, Internet and Telecommunication Regulation (Carolina Academic Press 2019).Google Scholar
BEREC (The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications), “Draft BEREC Report on the Internet Ecosystem” BoR (22) 87 (June 9, 2022).Google Scholar
BEREC (The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications), “Report on Harmonized Definitions for Indicators Regarding Over-the-Top Services” BoR (21) 127 (September 30, 2021).Google Scholar
Berman, Ayelet et al., “Rethinking Stakeholder Participation in Global Governance” in Pauwelyn, Joost et al. (eds), Rethinking Participation in Global Governance: Voice and Influence after Stakeholder Reforms in Global Finance and Health (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Black, Julia and Baldwin, Robert, “When Risk-Based Regulation Aims Low: A Strategic Framework” (2012) 6(2) Regulation & Governance 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Janet, International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnett, Thomas, Telewars in the States: Telecommunications Issues in a New Era of Competition (Council of Governors’ Policy Advisors 1996).Google Scholar
Brenner, Daniel L., “Creating Effective Broadband Network Regulation” (2010) 62 Federal Communications Law Journal 13.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Dan and Murphree, Michael, “The Rise of China in Technology Standards: New Norms in Old Institutions” (2016) Research Report Prepared on Behalf of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.Google Scholar
Brownsword, Roger and Somsen, Han, “Law, Innovation and Technology: Before We Fast Forward – A Forum for Debate” (2009) 1 Law, Innovation and Technology 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burk, Dan L., “Algorithmic Legal Metrics” (2021) 96 Notre Dame Law Review 1147.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Marcus et al., “Introduction” in Burkhardt, Marcus et al. (eds) Interrogating Datafication: Towards a Praxeology of Data (Transcript Publishing 2022).Google Scholar
Burri, Mira, “EU External Trade Policy in The Digital Age: Has Culture Been Left Behind?” (2022) Trade Law 4.0 Working Paper Series University of Lucerne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burri, Mira, “Interfacing Privacy and Trade” (2021) 53 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 35.Google Scholar
Burri, Mira, “The Global Digital Divide as Impeded Access to Content” in Burri, Mira and Cottier, Thomas (eds), Trade Governance in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burri, Mira, “Towards a New Treaty on Digital Trade,” (2021) 55(1) Journal of World Trade 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burri, Mira, “Trade Law 4.0: Are We There Yet? (2023) 26(1) Journal of International Economic Law 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter, The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Buyya, Rajkumar and Dastjerdi, Amir (eds), Internet of Things: Principles and Paradigms (Elsevier 2016).Google Scholar
Candeub, Adam, “Reading Section 230 as Written” (2021) 1 Journal of Free Speech Law 139.Google Scholar
Carrilloa, Arturo J., “Having Your Cake and Eating It Too? Zero-Rating, Net Neutrality, and International Law” (2016) 19 Stanford Technology Law Review 364.Google Scholar
CASBAA (Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia), “A Titled Playing Field: Asia-Pacific Pay TV and OTT” (2012).Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin et al., “Private Authority and Public Policy Interactions in Global Context: Governance Spheres for Problem Solving” (2021) 15 Regulation & Governance 1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisse, Julien and Matsushita, Mitsuo, “China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications” (2018) 52 Journal of World Trade 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chander, Anupam and Schwartz, Paul, “Privacy and/or Trade” (2023) 90(1) University of Chicago Law Review 49.Google Scholar
Chander, Anupam and Sun, Haochen, “Sovereignty 2.0” (2021) Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2021).Google Scholar
Chander, Anupam, “Section 230 and the International Law of Facebook” (2022) 24 Yale Journal of Law & Technology 393.Google Scholar
Chi, Carmody, “When Cultural Identity Was Not at Issue: Thinking About Canada – Certain Measures Concerning Periodicals” (1999) 30 Law & Policy of International Business 231.Google Scholar
Ciuriak, Dan and Fay, Robert, “The Digital Economy Partnership Agreement: Should Canada Join?” (2022) 171 Centre for International Governance Innovation Policy Brief.Google Scholar
Ciuriak, Dan, “The Challenge of Updating Institutions for Digital Trade” (2021) Opinion, Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
Claussen, Kathleen, “Trade’s Security Exceptionalism” (2020) 72 Stanford Law Review 1097.Google Scholar
Cohen, Harlan Grant, “Nations and Markets” (2020) 23(4) Journal of International Economic Law 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Julie E., Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of the Informational Capitalism (Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Julie E., “Law for the Platform Economy” (2017) 51 U.C. Davis Law Review 133.Google Scholar
Condron, Sean M., “Getting It Right: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure in Cyberspace” (2007) 20(2) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 403.Google Scholar
Cory, Nigel and Dascoli, Luke, “How Barriers to Cross-Border Data Flows Are Spreading Globally, What They Cost, and How to Address Them” Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF) (July 19, 2021).Google Scholar
Cossy, Mirelle, “Cross-Border Supply of Services – Pattern of Specific Commitments” (April 28–29, 2005), WTO Symposium on Cross-Border Supply of Services.Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick and Mejias, Ulises A., The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism (Stanford University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Creutz, Katja, “Law versus Codes of Conduct: Between Convergence and Conflict” in Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Cunningham, McKay, “Next Generation Privacy: The Internet of Things, Data Exhaust, and Reforming Regulation by Risk of Harm” (2014) 2(2) Groningen Journal of International Law 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delev, Christian, “A Moral Stretch? US–Tariff Measures and the Public Morals Exception in WTO Law” (2021) World Trade Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis, “Concluding the WTO Services Negotiations on Domestic Regulation: Hopes and Fears” (2020) 9(4) World Trade Review 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis, International Trade in Services and Domestic Regulations: Necessity, Transparency and Regulatory Diversity (Oxford University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Gregory M., “Rebooting Internet Immunity” (2021) 89 George Washington Law Review 347.Google Scholar
Dorobantu, Cosmina et al., “Source Code Disclosure: A Primer for Trade Negotiators” in Borchert, Ingo and Winters, Alan (eds), Addressing Impediments to Digital Trade (CEPR Press 2021).Google Scholar
Ducci, Francesco, Natural Monopolies in Digital Platform Markets (Cambridge University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, William H., “Multistakeholder Internet Governance?” (2016) World Bank Background Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Benjamin and Stemler, Abbey, “From the Digital to the Physical: Federal Limitations on Regulating Online Marketplaces” (2019) 56 Harvard Journal on Legislation 142.Google Scholar
Elms, Deborah, “The Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Policy Innovations and Impacts” (2018) Global Economic Dynamics Focus Paper.Google Scholar
EMAG, “Digital Platform’s Market Power” (September 30, 2019).Google Scholar
Emmerson, Andrew, “Conceptualizing Security Exceptions: Legal Doctrine or Political Excuse?” (2008) 11 Journal of International Economic Law 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ENISA, “Guidelines for Securing the Internet of Things” (2020).Google Scholar
Erie, Matthew S. and Streinz, Thomas, “The Beijing Effect: China’s Digital Silk Road as Transnational Data Governance” (2021) 54(1) New York University Journal of International Law & Policy 1.Google Scholar
European Commission, “Better Regulation: Guidelines and Toolbox” (November 3, 2021).Google Scholar
European Commission, “Competition Policy for the Digital Era” (May 20, 2019).Google Scholar
European Commission, “Cybersecurity of 5G Networks - EU Toolbox of Risk Mitigating Measures” (2020).Google Scholar
European Commission, “DSA: Very Large Online Platforms and Search Engines” (April 25, 2023).Google Scholar
European Commission, “Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC” SWD (2020) 348 final (December 15, 2020).Google Scholar
European Commission, “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Horizontal Cybersecurity Requirements for Products with Digital Elements and Amending Regulation” (2022).Google Scholar
European Commission, “Shaping Europe’s Digital Future” (October 17, 2022).Google Scholar
European Commission, “The Future of the Electronic Communications Sector and its Infrastructure, Consultation Questionnaire” (February 23, 2023).Google Scholar
European Commission, “Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework” (March 25, 2022).Google Scholar
European Parliament, “Digital Sovereignty for Europe” (July 2020).Google Scholar
European Parliament, “Europe’s Digital Decade and Autonomy” (2021).Google Scholar
European Parliament, “Liability of Online Platforms” (2021).Google Scholar
European Parliament, “The Impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on Artificial Intelligence” (2020).Google Scholar
Ezrachi, Ariel and Stucke, Maurice, Virtual Competition – The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy (Harvard University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FCC, “Reports to Congress on Future of the Universal Service Fund” (August 15, 2022).Google Scholar
Fisher, Angelina and Streinz, Thomas, “Confronting Data Inequality” (2022) 60(3) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 829.Google Scholar
Flyverbom, Mikkel, The Digital Prism – Transparency and Managed Visibilities in a Datafied World (Cambridge University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Ursula, The Real World of Technology (Anansi Press 1999).Google Scholar
FTC, “Report to Congress on Privacy and Security” (September 13, 2021).Google Scholar
Gao, Henry, “Digital or Trade? The Contrasting Approaches of China and US to Digital Trade” (2018) 21(2) Journal of International Economic Law 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, Henry, “E-commerce Joint Statement Initiative Negotiation and China” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Gao, Henry, “Google’s China Problem: A Case Study on Trade, Technology and Human Rights under the GATS” (2011) 6 Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law & Policy 349.Google Scholar
Gari, Gabriel, “Recent Preferential Trade Agreements’ Disciplines for Tackling Regulatory Divergence in Services: How Far beyond GATS?” (2020) 19(1) World Trade Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlick, Jeremy, The Impact of China’s Belt and Roald Initiative (Routledge 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, Urs et al., “Multistakeholder as Governance Groups: Observations from Case Studies” (2015) The Berkman Ctr. for Internet & Society Research Publication Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, Urs, “Futuring Digital Privacy: Reimaging the Law/Tech Interplay” in Burri, Mira (ed), Big Data and Global Trade Law (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Gellert, Raphaël, The Risk-Based Approach to Data Protection (Oxford University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geradin, Damien and Kerf, Michel, “Levelling the Playing Field: Is the WTO Adequately Equipped to Prevent Anti-Competitive Practices in Telecommunications?” in Geradin, Damien and Luff, David (eds), The WTO and Global Convergence in Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services (Cambridge University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Eric, “Five Things to Know about Section 230” (2021) Center for International Governance Innovation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, “Norms and National Security: The WTO as a Catalyst for Inquiry” (2001) 2 Chicago Journal of International Law 101.Google Scholar
Gough, Ian , “Universal Basic Services: A Theoretical and Moral Framework” (2019) 90(3) The Political Quarterly 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Canada, “What Does the CPTPP Mean for Canadian Culture?” (2018).Google Scholar
Grubesic, Tony and Mack, Elizabeth, Broadband Telecommunications and Regional Development (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Gur, Berna Akcali, “Cybersecurity, European Digital Sovereignty and the 5G Rollout Crisis” (2022) 46 Computer Law & Security Review 1.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Daniel S. and Quinlan, Joseph P., “The Transatlantic Economy 2021: Annual Survey of Jobs, Trade and Investment between the United States and Europe” (2021).Google Scholar
Haskel, Jonathan and Westlake, Stian, Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy (Princeton University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. Benton, “The New National Security Challenge to the Economic Order” (2020) 129 Yale Law Journal 1020.Google Scholar
Helmersen, Sondre T., “The Evolutionary Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body in Abi-Saab, Georges et al. (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart Publishing 2019).Google Scholar
Hintz, Arne et al., Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society (Polity Press 2019).Google Scholar
Hintze, Mike, “In Defense of the Long Privacy Statement” (2017) 76 Maryland Law Review 1044.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert, “Antitrust and Platform Monopoly” (2021) 130 Yale Law Journal 1952.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, “Importing Regulatory Standards and Principles into WTO Dispute Settlement: The Challenge of Interpreting the GATS Arrangements on Telecommunications” in Lianos, Ioannis and Odudu, Okeoghene (eds), Regulating Trade in Services in the EU and the WTO: Trust, Distrust and Economic Integration (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Iansiti, Marco and Lakhani, Karim R., Competing in the Age of AI: How Machine Intelligence Changes the Rules of Business (Harvard Business Review Press 2020).Google Scholar
IHRB (Institute for Human Rights and Business), “Data Brokers and Human Rights: Big Data, Big Business” (November 2016).Google Scholar
International Trade Union Confederation, “E-Commerce, Free Trade Agreements, Digital Chapters and the Impact on Labor” (2019).Google Scholar
ITU, “Digital Inclusion of All” (2019).Google Scholar
ITU, “GSR Discussion Paper: Regulation and the Internet of Things” (2015).Google Scholar
ITU, “Setting the Scene for 5G: Opportunities & Challenges” (2018).Google Scholar
ITU, “The State of Broadband 2020: Tackling Digital Inequalities” (September 2020).Google Scholar
ITU, “Universal Service Funds and Digital Inclusion for All” (2013).Google Scholar
ITU-D, “Digital Inclusion” (2023).Google Scholar
Kamara, Irene, “Co-Regulation in EU Personal Data Protection: The Case of Technical Standards and the Privacy by Design Standardization Mandate” (2017) 8(1) European Journal of Law and Technology 1.Google Scholar
Kamara, Irene, “Misaligned Union Laws? A Comparative Analysis of Certification in the Cybersecurity Act and the General Data Protection Regulation” in Hallinan, Dara et al. (eds), Data Protection and Artificial Intelligence (Hart Publishing 2021).Google Scholar
Kaminski, Margot E., “Binary Governance: Lessons from the GDPR’s Approach to Algorithmic Accountability” (2019) 92 Southern California Law Review 1529.Google Scholar
Kanetake, Machiko and Nollkaemper, André, “The Application of Informal International Instruments Before Domestic Courts” (2014) 46 George Washington International Law Review 765.Google Scholar
Katz, Vanessa, “Regulating the Sharing Economy” (2015) 30 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1067.Google Scholar
Kelsey, Jane, “The Illegitimacy of Joint Statement Initiatives and Their Systemic Implications for the WTO” (2022) 25 Journal of International Economic Law 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Charles H., An Introduction to U.S. Telecommunications Law (Artech House 2001).Google Scholar
Khan, Lina M., “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” (2017) 126 Yale Law Journal 710.Google Scholar
Kho, Stephen and McNamara, Yujin K., “Focus on China: The Expansive Use of National Security Measures to Address Economic Competitiveness Concerns” (2022) 17 University of Pennsylvania Asian Law Review 368.Google Scholar
Knight, Lizzie and Voon, Tania, “The Evolution of National Security at the Interface Between Domestic and International Investment Law and Policy: The Role of China” (2020) 21 Journal of World Investment and Trade 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajewski, Markus, National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services (Kluwer Law International 2003).Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, “Jurisdiction Unbound: (Extra)territorial Regulation as Global Governance” (2022) 33(2) European Journal of International Law 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurthy, Vivek et al., “CDA 230 Goes North American? Examining the Impacts of the USMCA’s Intermediary Liability Provisions in Canada and the United States” (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulesza, Joanna and Weber, Rolf H., “Protecting the Internet with International Law” (2021) 40 Computer Law & Security Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachaud, Eric, “What GDPR Tells about Certification” (2020) 38 Computer Law and Security Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Andrew, “GATS” in Bethlehem, Daniel et al. (eds), Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Lim, Aik Hoe, “Trade Rules for Industry 4.0” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, On the Interpretation of Treaties (Springer 2007).Google Scholar
Lodge, Martin and Wegrich, Kai, Managing Regulation: Regulatory Analysis Politics and Policy (Palgrave Macmillan 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luff, David, “Telecommunications and Audiovisual Services: Considerations for a Convergence Policy at the World Trade Organization Level” (2004) 38(6) Journal of World Trade 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markopoulou, Dimitra et al., “The New EU Cybersecurity Framework: The NIS Directive, ENISA’s Role and the General Data Protection Regulation” (2019) 35(6) Computer Law & Security Review 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo et al., “Competition Policy and Trade” in Matsushita, Mitsuo et al. (eds.) The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Matsushita, Mitsuo, “Trade and Competition Policy” in Bethlehem, Daniel et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya and Sauve, Pierre, “Regionalism in Services Trade” in Mattoo, Aaditya et al. (eds), A Handbook of International Trade in Services (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C. and Wolfe, Robert, “Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More” (2017) 16 World Trade Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Trade in Goods (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Mayer-Schonberger, Viktor and Cukier, Kenneth, Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (Harper Business 2013 ).Google Scholar
McDonald, Aleecia M., “Stakeholders and High Stakes Divergent Standards for Do Not Track” in Selinger, Evan et al. (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar
McNealy, Jasmine E., “Sonic Privacy” (2022) 24 Yale Journal of Law and Technology 365.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Joshua P., “The Internet, Cross-Border Data Flows and International Trade” (2015) 2(1) Asia & Pacific Policy Studies 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuwese, Anne, “Constitutional Aspects of Regulatory Coherence in TTIP: An EU Perspective” (2015) 78 Law & Contemporary Problems 153.Google Scholar
Mishra, Neha, “International Trade Law Meets Data Ethics: A Brave New World” (2020) 53(2) New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 305.Google Scholar
Mishra, Neha“The Trade – (Cyber)security Dilemma and its Impact on Global Cybersecurity Governance” (2020) 54(4) Journal of World Trade 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, Sudip et al., Introduction to Industrial Internet of Things and Industry 4.0 (Routledge 2020).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew and Mishra, Neha, “Digital Trade Integration in Preferential Trade Agreements” (2020) 191 Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series 34–36.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew and Mishra, Neha, “Regulating Cross-Border Data Flows in a Data-Driven World: How WTO Law Can Contribute” (2019) 22(3) Journal of International Economic Law 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., Legal Principles in WTO Disputes (Cambridge University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D., “Brief of Evidence of Andrew David Mitchell in the Matter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Inquiry before the Waitangi Tribunal” (2020).Google Scholar
Moazed, Alex and Johnson, Nicholas L., Modern Monopolies: What It Takes to Dominate the Twenty-First Century Economy (St. Martin’s Press 2016).Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World (Harvard University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Mundie, Craig, “Privacy Pragmatism: Focus on Data Use, Not Data Collection” (2014) 93(2) Foreign Affairs 28.Google Scholar
NIST, “Cybersecurity for IOT Program” (2023).Google Scholar
NIST, “Cybersecurity Framework” (2022).Google Scholar
OECD, “Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age” (2017).Google Scholar
OECD, “Big Data: Bringing Competition Policy to the Digital Era” DAF/COMP (2016).Google Scholar
OECD, “Fostering Cross-Border Data Flows with Trust” OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 343 (December 2022).Google Scholar
OECD, “Regional Competition Agreements: Benefits and Challenges” (November 29, 2018).Google Scholar
OECD, “Regulatory Impact Analysis: A Tool for Policy Coherence” (2009).Google Scholar
OECD, “Regulatory Impact Assessment, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy” (2020).Google Scholar
OECD, “Reviews of Risk Management Policies Good Governance for Critical Infrastructure Resilience” (2019).Google Scholar
Partiti, Enrico et al., “Evolutionary Dynamics of Transnational Private Regulation” (2023) Transnational Legal Theory 1.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, “Rien ne va plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation from Market Access in GATT and GATS” (2005) 4 World Trade Review 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, “Rule-Based Trade 2.0? The Rise of Informal Rules and International Standards and How They May Outcompete WTO Treaties” (2014) 17 Journal of International Economic Law 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi and Liu, Han-Wei, “The Legality of Data Residency Requirements: How Can the Trans-Pacific Partnership Help?” (2017) 51:2 Journal of World Trade 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi, “Autonomous Vehicle Standards under the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi, “Cybersecurity and Trade Governance” in Chaisse, Julien & Rodríguez-Chiffelle, Cristián (eds), The Elgar Companion to the WTO (Edward Elgar 2023).Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi, “Cybersecurity Threats and the WTO National Security Exceptions” (2015) 18(2) Journal of International Economic Law 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Digital Trade” in Bethlehem, Daniel et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“GATS and the Over-the-Top Services: A Legal Outlook” (2016) 50(1) Journal of World Trade 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Lessons from the TPP Regulatory Coherence Chapter: The Laws Governing Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Messages as a Case Study” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Governing Science and Technology under the International Economic Order: Regulatory Divergence and Convergence in the Age of Mega-regionals (Edward Elgar 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Levelling the Playing Field between Sharing Platforms and Industry Incumbents: Good Regulatory Practices?” in Chander, Anupam and Sun, Haochen (eds), Data Sovereignty: From the Digital Silk Road to the Return of the State (Oxford University Press 2023).Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Private Cybersecurity Standards? Cyberspace Governance, Multistakeholderism, and the (Ir)relevance of the TBT Regime” (2018) 51(2) Cornell International Law Journal 445.Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Public–Private Interactions in Privacy Governance” (Concept Paper) (2022) 11(6) MDPI-Laws Special Issue: International Law as a Driver of Internet Governance 80.Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Regulating New Services through Litigation? Electronic Commerce as a Case Study on the Evaluation of ‘Judicial Activism’ in the WTO” (2014) 48(6) Journal of World Trade 1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Renegotiate the WTO Commitments? Technological Change and Treaty Interpretation” (2012) 45(2) Cornell International Law Journal 403.Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“The Rule of Law in Times of Technological Uncertainty: Is International Economic Law Ready for Emerging Supervisory Trends?” (2019) 22(1) Journal of International Economic Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“The Uneasy Interplay between Digital Inequality and International Economic Law” (2022) 33(1) European Journal of International Law 205.Google Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Trade in Telecommunications Services: Doha and Beyond” (2007) 41(2) Journal of World Trade.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shin-yi“Universal Telecommunications Service in China: Trade Liberalization, Subsidy, and Technology in the Making of Information Equality in the Broadband Era” (2003) 4 Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 21.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, “Competition-oriented Reforms of the WTO World Trade System-Proposals and Policy Options” in Zach, Roger et al. (eds.), Towards WTO Competition Rules (Kluwer Law International 1999).Google Scholar
Petit, Nicolas, Big Tech & the Digital Economy: The Moligopoly Scenario (Oxford University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piffaut, Henri, “Algorithms: The Impact on Competition” (2022) 23(1) Business Law International 5.Google Scholar
Polanco, Rodrigo Lazo and Gómez Fiedler, Sebastián, “A Requiem for The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Something New, Something Old and Something Borrowed?” (2018) 18(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 298.Google Scholar
Polanco, Rodrigo, “The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and Regulatory Coherence” in Voon, Tania (ed), Trade Liberalization and International Cooperation: A Legal Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Edward Elgar 2013).Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, “Governing the Internet” (2017) 110 American Journal of International Law 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidenberg, Joel R. et al., “Trustworthy Privacy Indicators: Grades, Labels, Certifications, and Dashboards” (2019) 96 Washington University Law Review 1409.Google Scholar
Rothchild, John A., “Against Notice and Choice: The Manifest Failure of the Proceduralist Paradigm to Protect Privacy Online or Anywhere Else” (2018) 66 Cleveland State Law Review 559.Google Scholar
Rounseville, Isaac, “Drawing A Line: Legislative Proposals to Clarify the CDA, Reinforce Consumer Rights, and Establish a Uniform Policy for Online Marketplaces” (2020) 60(4) Jurimetrics 263.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Ira S., “The Future of Self-Regulation Is Co-Regulation” in Selinger, Evan et al. (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Rustad, Michael L. and Koenig, Thomas H, “Creating a Public Health Disinformation Exception to CDA Section 230” (2021) 71 Syracuse Law Review 1255.Google Scholar
Sauvé, Pierre, Trade Rules Behind Borders: Essays on Services, Investment and the New Trade Agenda (Cameron May 2003).Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan and Briese, Robyn, “If the State Considers: The Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement,” in von Bogdandy, Armin et al. (eds), 13 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nationals Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009).Google Scholar
Segura, María Soledad and Waisbord, Silvio, “Between Data Capitalism and Data Citizenship,” (2019) 20(4) Television & New Media 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selbst, Andrew D and Powles, Julia, “Meaningful Information and the Right to Explanation” (2017) 7(4) International Data Privacy Law 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semendyai, Vladimir J., “Due Process and the FTC’s Fair and Reasonable Approach to Data Protection” (2016) 84 George Washington Law Review 51.Google Scholar
Shackelford, Scott J. et al., “Bottoms Up: A Comparison of “Voluntary” Cybersecurity Frameworks” (2016) 16 U.C. Davis Business Law Journal 217.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory and Gao, Henry, “A New Chinese Economic Order?” (2020) 23(3) Journal of International Economic Law 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, “Governing the Interface of U.S. – China Trade Relations” (2022) 115(4) American Journal of International Law 650.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, “Reconceiving Trade Agreements for Social Inclusion” in Elsig, Manfred et al. (eds), The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, “Trade Law in a Data-Driven Economy: The Need for Modesty and Resilience” in Peng, Shin-yi at al. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stuart, “The Triumph of Regulatory Politics: Benefit–Cost Analysis and Political Salience” (2012) 6 Regulation & Governance 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidak, Gregory and Spulber, Daniel, “Deregulation and Managed Competition in Network Industries” (1998) 15 Yale Journal on Regulation 117.Google Scholar
Skinner, Chris, Digital Human: The Fourth Revolution of Humanity Includes Everyone (UNKNO 2018).Google Scholar
Słok-Wódkowska, Magdalena and Mazur, Joanna, “Secrecy by Default: How Regional Trade Agreements Reshape Protection of Source Code” (2022) 25(1) Journal of International Economic Law 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomun, Sonja et al., “Platform Responsibility and Regulation in Canada: Considerations on Transparency, Legislative Clarity, and Design” (2021) 34 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 1.Google Scholar
Solove, Daniel J., “Privacy Self-Management and The Consent Dilemma” (2013) 126 Harvard Law Review 1879.Google Scholar
Southerton, Clare, “Datafication” in Schintler, Laurie A. and McNeely, Connie L. (eds), Encyclopedia of Big Data (Springer International 2022).Google Scholar
Streinz, Thomas, “International Economic Law’s Regulation of Data as a Resource for the Artificial Intelligence Economy” in Shin-yi Peng, et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Stucke, Maurice and Grunes, Allen, Big Data and Competition Policy (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Sullivan, Clare, “EU GDPR or APEC CBPR? A Comparative Analysis of the Approach of the EU and APEC to Cross Border Data Transfers and Protection of Personal Data in the IoT Era” (2019) 35(4) Computer Law & Security Review 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suominen, Kati, “Implications of the European Union’s Digital Regulations on U.S. and EU Economic and Strategic Interests” Center for Strategic & International Studies (November 2022).Google Scholar
Sylvain, Olivier, “Platform Realism, Informational Inequality, and Section 230 Reform” (2021) 131 Yale Law Journal 475.Google Scholar
The U.S. White House, “Executive Order on Protecting Americans’ Sensitive Data from Foreign Adversaries” (June 09, 2021).Google Scholar
The U.S. White House, “National Security Strategy” (2022).Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., “Platforms and Global Governance: Globalization on Steroids” (2023) 26(1) Journal of International Economic Law 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trautman, Lawrence J., “Is Cyberattack the Next Pearl Harbor?” (2016) 18 North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology 233.Google Scholar
Tuthill, Lee and Roy, Martin, “GATS Classification Issues for Information and Communication Technology Services” in Burri, Mia and Cottier, Thomas (eds), Trade Governance in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Tuthill, Lee, “The GATS and New Rules for Regulators” (1997) 21 Telecommunications Policy 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Guidance Regarding Methods for De-identification of Protected Health Information in Accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule” (2010).Google Scholar
UK Parliament, “Digital Trade and Data” First Report (June 23, 2021).Google Scholar
UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport, “Consultation Outcome- Audience Protection Standards on Video-on-Demand Services” (April 28, 2022).Google Scholar
UNCTAD, “Digital Economy Report” (2019).Google Scholar
UNCTAD, “Technology and Innovation Report” (2021).Google Scholar
UNCTAD, “The COVID-19 Crisis: Accentuating the Need to Bridge the Digital Divides” (2020).Google Scholar
United Nations, “World Investment Report 2016” (2016).Google Scholar
United Nations, “World Investment Report 2022” (2022).Google Scholar
United States President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), “Big Data and Privacy: A Technological Perspective” (2014).Google Scholar
USTR, “National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers” (2023).Google Scholar
USTR, “Report to Congress on China’s WTO Compliance” (2021).Google Scholar
van Aaken, Anne, “Introduction to the Symposium on Digital Trade” (2023) 117 AJIL Unbound 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Damme, Isabelle, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljoen, Salomé, “A Relational Theory of Data Governance” (2021) 131 Yale Law Journal 573.Google Scholar
Viljoen, Salomé, “An Argument for Positive Political Theories of Data Governance” (2022) 6 Georgetown Law Technology Review 464.Google Scholar
Voon, Tania, Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, Ari E., Privacy as Trust: Information Privacy for an Information Age (Cambridge University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Heng, “The Belt and Road Initiative Agreements: Characteristics, Rationale, and Challenges” (2021) 20 World Trade Review 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Rolf H. and Burri, Mira, Classification of Services in the Digital Economy (Springer 2012).Google Scholar
Weber, Rolf H. and Evelyne, Studer, “Cybersecurity in the Internet of Things: Legal Aspects” (2016) 32 Computer Law & Security Review 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Rolf H., “Global Law in the Face of Datafication and Artificial Intelligence” in Peng, Shin-yi et al. (eds), Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar
West, Sarah Myers, “Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy” (2019) 58(1) Business & Society 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Nigel, “Australia’s National Broadband Network: A Cybersecure Critical Infrastructure?” (2014) 30 Computer Law & Security 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Forum, “How Industrial Data Can Help Unleash Productivity, Innovation and Sustainability” (May 13, 2022).Google Scholar
WTO Secretariat, Guide to the GATS: An Overview of Issues for Further Liberalization of Trade in Services (Kluwer Law International 2001).Google Scholar
WTO, “Background Note by the Secretariat, Advertising Services” S/C/W/47 (July 9, 1998).Google Scholar
WTO, “Declaration on The Conclusion of Negotiations on Services Domestic Regulation” WT/L/1129 (December 2, 2021).Google Scholar
WTO, “E-Commerce, Trade and the Covid-19 Pandemic Information Note” (2020).Google Scholar
WTO, “Guidelines for the Scheduling of Specific Commitments Under the General Agreement on Trade in Services” Council for Trade in Services, S/L/92 (March 28, 2001).Google Scholar
WTO, “Joint Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation Reference Paper on Services Domestic Regulation” INF/SDR/2 (November 26, 2021).Google Scholar
WTO, “Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce” WT/L/1056 (January 25, 2019).Google Scholar
WTO, “Joint Statement on the Negotiations on Audiovisual Service” TN/S/W/49 (June 30, 2005).Google Scholar
WTO, “Minutes of the Meeting of the Council for Trade in Goods” G/C/M/139 (June 16, 2021).Google Scholar
WTO, “Multilateral Trade Negotiations the Uruguay Round Group of Negotiations on Services” MTN.GNS/23 (July 11, 1989).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, “Work Programme on Electronic Commerce” S/C/W/359 (December 17, 2014).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, “WTO Negotiations on Trade-Related Aspects of E-Commerce” INF/ECOM/1 (March 25, 2019).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, “Understanding on the Scope of Coverage of CPC 84 – Computer and Related Services” TN/S/W/60, S/CSC/W/51 (January 26, 2007).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, “Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce” INF/ECOM/19 (April 24, 2019).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, “The E-Commerce Moratorium: Scope and Impact” WT/GC/W798 (March 10, 2020).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, “GATS 2000; Audio-visual Services, Council for Trade in Services” S/CSS/W/74 (May 4, 2001).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, “Report of Panel Discussion on Digital Industrial Policy and Development” JOB/GC/133 (July 21, 2017).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, “China’s Transitional Review Mechanism” G/TBT/W/326 (October 29, 2009).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, “Elements for Complementary Approaches in Services” TN/S/W/55 (October 27, 2005).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, “Classification in the Telecom Sector under the WTO-GATS Framework” TN/S/W/27, S/CSC/W/44 (February 10, 2005).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, “An Enabling Environment to Facilitate Online Transactions” TN/S/W/64 (May 23, 2017).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the United States, “Work Programme on Electronic Commerce: Ensuring that Trade Rules Support Innovative Advances in Computer Applications and Platforms” S/C/W/339 (September 20, 2011).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the United States, Electronic Commerce Negotiations – Consolidated Negotiating Text, INF/ECOM/62/Rev.1 (December 2020).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the United States, Non-Paper for the Discussions on Electronic Commerce, “Work Programme on Electronic Commerce” JOB/GC/100 (July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
WTO, Communication by the United States, Communication from Argentina, Colombia and Costa Rica, Communication from Australia and Canada, Communication from China, Communication from India and South Africa, Communication from Switzerland, Communication from the African Group, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the European Commission, Communication from the United States, Non-Paper from Brazil, “Exploratory Work on Electronic Commerce” INF/ECOM/3 (March 25, 2019).Google Scholar
Wu, Mark, “Digital Trade-Related Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Existing Models and Lessons for the Multilateral Trade System” (November 2017) RTA Exchange, ICTSD and IDB.Google Scholar
Wu, Tim & Yoo, Christopher S., “Keeping the Internet Neutral? Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate” (2007) 59 Federal Communications Law Journal 575.Google Scholar
Wu, Tim, “Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination” (2002) 2 Journal of Telecomm. & High Technology Law 141.Google Scholar
Wu, Tim, “The World Trade Law of Censorship and Internet Filtering” 7(1) Chicago Journal of International Law (2006) 263.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Rüdiger et al., “Pioneers, Leaders and Followers in Multilevel and Polycentric Climate Governance” in Wurzel, Rüdiger et al. (eds), Pioneers, Leaders and Followers in Multilevel and Polycentric Climate Governance (Routledge 2020).Google Scholar
Yoo, Christopher S., “Beyond Network Neutrality” (2005) 19 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 1.Google Scholar
Yoo, Christopher S., “Wireless Network Neutrality: Technological Challenges and Policy Implications” (2016) 31 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1409.Google Scholar
Zuboff, Shoshana, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (Public Affairs 2019).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Shin-yi Peng, National Tsing Hua University
  • Book: International Economic Law in the Era of Datafication
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009355025.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Shin-yi Peng, National Tsing Hua University
  • Book: International Economic Law in the Era of Datafication
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009355025.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Shin-yi Peng, National Tsing Hua University
  • Book: International Economic Law in the Era of Datafication
  • Online publication: 28 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009355025.012
Available formats
×