Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations and notation
- Introduction
- Part I The data
- Part II The theories
- An opinionated conclusion
- Appendix A Possible worlds and semantics
- Appendix B Modality in possible-word semantics
- Appendix C Stalnaker’s common-ground model of assertion
- Glossary
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations and notation
- Introduction
- Part I The data
- Part II The theories
- An opinionated conclusion
- Appendix A Possible worlds and semantics
- Appendix B Modality in possible-word semantics
- Appendix C Stalnaker’s common-ground model of assertion
- Glossary
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Imperatives , pp. 307 - 319Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
(2014). On future in commands. Future Times, Future Tenses. , and (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Modern Japanese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 106–125.Google Scholar
(2000). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
and (2003a). Imperatives in dialogue. The Semantics and the Pragmatics of Dialogue for the New Millennium. , and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1–24.Google Scholar
(1975). How to Do Things with Words. Second edition, and (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). Meaning and Mind: An Examination of a Gricean Account of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Standardization revisited. Pragmatics: Critical Assessment. Vol. IV. (ed.). London: Routledge: 712–722.Google Scholar
(1999). ‘The myth of conventional implicature’. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1944). ‘Imperative sentences in relation to indicatives’. Philosophical Review 53: 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). ‘Agreement in Laizo’. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1: 11–22.Google Scholar
, and (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). ‘Who needs semantics of quotation marks?’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 27–49.Google Scholar
(2004). ‘A demonstrative analysis of “open quotation”’. Mind and Language 19(5): 534–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). Imperative sentences: theoretical problems. Typology of imperative constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 3–50.Google Scholar
(1987). ‘Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?’. Journal of Pragmatics 11(2): 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). Mood in modern Georgian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 603–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Semantics for nondeclaratives. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. and (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 864–893.Google Scholar
(1998). Intonation in American English. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. and (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 45–55.Google Scholar
(1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). Mood in Albanian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and (1984). Basic modal logic. Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. III. and (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 1–88.Google Scholar
, and (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
and (2001). Imperative in Vietnamese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 461–474.Google Scholar
and (2007). Language Turned on Itself: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Metalinguistic Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988). Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155–181.Google Scholar
(2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). Restricting and embedding imperatives. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 2009, LNAI 6042. and (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer: 223–233.Google Scholar
and (1990). Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1993). ‘Relevance and “pseudo-imperatives”’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(1): 79–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1980). ‘Polite responses to polite requests’. Cognition 8(2): 111–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1964). ‘Do illocutionary forces exist?’ Philosophical Quarterly 14(55): 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2012). Imperatives: meaning and illocutionary force. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9. (ed.) University of California, Santa Cruz: 37–58.Google Scholar
(2006). The Hawaiian passive/imperative particle. Voice and Grammatical Relations: In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani. and . Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1–14.Google Scholar
and (2009). Embedding imperatives in English. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13. and (eds.). University of Stuttgart: 113–127.Google Scholar
and (1997). ‘Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination’. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 195–217.Google Scholar
(1979). Moods and Performances. Meaning and use. (ed.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Quotations and the intrusion of non-linguistic communication into utterances. Modeling and Using Context: Fifth International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2005. , , and (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer: 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). ‘The imperative in English: a corpus-based, pragmatic analysis’, Ph.D. dissertation, Ghent, Ghent University.
(2011). Tense, aspect, and modality systems. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 445–464.Google Scholar
and (2001). Imperative constructions in Hausa. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 329–351.Google Scholar
, and (2005). The optative. The World Atlas of Language Structures. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 298–301.Google Scholar
and (2002). Speech acts and Relevance theory. Essays in speech act theory. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 263–283.Google Scholar
(1993). Mood, force and convention. The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 202–223.Google Scholar
, and (1998). Intonation in Vietnamese. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. and (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 395–416.Google Scholar
(2000). ‘Realis and irrealis: forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality’. Linguistic Typology 4: 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). ‘Grammar and pragmatics: changes in the paradigm of the Estonian imperative’. Linguistica Uralica 40: 161–178.Google Scholar
(2007). Asking Questions: Using Meaningful Structures to Imply Ignorance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). Intonational variation: the High Rising Tone. Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). ‘Explicit second-person subjects in Russian imperatives: semantics, word-order, and a comparison with English’. Linguistics 48: 431–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). ‘Imperative as conditional: from constructional to compositional semantics’. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 641–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1918–1919/1997). Thought/Der Gedanke. The Frege Reader. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell: 325–345.Google Scholar
(2005). ‘Entertaining alternatives: disjunctions as modals’. Natural Language Semantics 13(4): 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Imperative in Aleut. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 300–314.Google Scholar
, and (1996). Coreference and modality. The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell: 179–213.Google Scholar
(2001). Imperative sentences in Nivkh. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 59–77.Google Scholar
(2006). ‘Aspects of modality’, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
(2000). The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
(1967). ‘Some alleged differences between imperatives and indicatives’. Mind 76: 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994). Mood, meaning and speech acts. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. (ed.). London: Routledge: 407–459.Google Scholar
(1976–1977). ‘Insincerity and commands’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). Functional Grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
(1962). Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1998). Intonation in British English. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. and (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 56–77.Google Scholar
and (1998). Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). Mood in Latvian and Lithuanian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). ‘From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening’. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). ‘The semantics of English imperatives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). ‘Are explicit performatives assertions?’. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). Relevance, assertion and possible worlds: a cognitive approach to the Spanish subjunctive. Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. and (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 235–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2011). Assertion, relevance and the declarative mood. Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. , and (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 267–289.Google Scholar
(2005). Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993). From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
(1989). Demonstratives. Themes from Kaplan. , and (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 481–563.Google Scholar
and (forthcoming). ‘Epistemic particles and performativity’. Proceedings of SALT 22.
(2008a). ‘Locutionary, illocutionary, perlocutionary’. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). ‘Illocutionary forces and what is said’. Mind and Language 24: 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2011). ‘Misleading appearances: Searle, assertion, and meaning’. Erkenntnis 74: 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012). Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. and (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2013). From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986). Apalaí. Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Vol. . and (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 33–127.Google Scholar
and (2007). Speech act distinctions in grammar. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure. Second edition. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 276–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Imperative sentences in French. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 372–389.Google Scholar
(2001). Imperative sentences in Armenian. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 245–267.Google Scholar
(1977). ‘What “must” and “can” must and can mean’. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981). The notional category of modality. Words, Worlds, and Contexts. and (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 38–74.Google Scholar
(1991). Modality. Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. and (eds.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 639–650.Google Scholar
(1990). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
and (1995). Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
and (2003). Truth and meaning. Donald Davidson. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 15–63.Google Scholar
and (2009). ‘The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 32: 429–448, 472–492.Google Scholar
(1972). General semantics. Semantics of Natural Language. and (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel: 169–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979). ‘Score-keeping in a language game’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). Mood in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). A note on alleged cases of nonsentential assertion. Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. and . Dordrecht: Springer: 95–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Truth in the garden of forking paths. Relative Truth. and (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977). ‘Semantics for non-indicative sentences’. Philosophical Studies 12: 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). Quoted imperatives. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14. , and (eds.). Vienna: 289–304.Google Scholar
(2001). Modern Hebrew. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 268–286.Google Scholar
(2005). ‘What can you do? Imperative mood in semantic theory’. Ph.D. dissertation: Amsterdam University.
(2011). ‘Imperatives as semantic primitives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). The subjects of English imperatives. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics.
and (2010). Mood in Estonian. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). Mood in Czach and Slovak. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. IX: Pragmatics. (ed.). New York: Academic Press: 261–280.Google Scholar
, , and (2001). Imperative sentences in Turkic languages. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 181–220.Google Scholar
(2007). Constructional economy and nonfinite independent clauses. Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. . Oxford: Oxford University Press: 138–180.Google Scholar
(2005). Two puzzles about deontic necessity. New Work on Modality. (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 51.), , and (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 149–178.Google Scholar
(2010). Mood in Irish. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Imperative sentences in Javanese. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 221–242.Google Scholar
, and (forthcoming). ‘The syntax and semantics of jussive clauses in Korean’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
and (2002). ‘Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts’. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). ‘The evolutionary social psychology of off-record indirect speech acts’. Intercultural Pragmatics 4: 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998). ‘On the subject of imperatives: a minimalist account of the imperative clause’. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 177–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986). Canela-Krahô. Handbook of Amazonian Languages. Vol. I. and (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 128–199.Google Scholar
(2005). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIV. and (eds.). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
(forthcoming). Imperatives. Cambridge Handbook of Semantics. and (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
and (2007). How to say no and don’t: negative imperatives in Romance and Germanic. Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar: Studies in Honour of Frits Beukema. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987). Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002). ‘Does linguistic communication rest on inference?’. Mind and Language 17: 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). The limits of expressibility. John Searle. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). ‘Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse’. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 683–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). ‘Modality in Amele and other Papuan languages’. Journal of Linguistics 26: 363–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970). On declarative sentences. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. and (eds.). Waltham: Ginn: 222–277.Google Scholar
(2007). ‘Imperatives in conditional conjunction’. Natural Language Semantics 15: 131–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1985). Speech act distinctions in syntax. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 155–196.Google Scholar
(2001). Indonesian. Typology of Imperative Constructions. (ed.). Munich: Lincom: 420–437.Google Scholar
(2005). The lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive (speculations on reference to worlds and semantic defaults in the analysis of mood). Proceedings of Going Romance XVII. , and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 269–309.Google Scholar
(1982). ‘How imperatives are different, and how they aren’t’. Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Nondeclaratives: 202–218.
(1972). ‘Style disjuncts and the performative analysis’. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 321–347.Google Scholar
and (2011). ‘A quantitative investigation of the imperative-and-declarative construction in English’. Language 87: 817–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975a). Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. and (eds.). New York: Academic Press: 59–82.Google Scholar
(1975b). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Language, Mind and Knowledge. (ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 344–369.Google Scholar
(2001b). ‘Unstable meanings, stable communication. Reply to Recanati’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2: 284–286.Google Scholar
and (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1991). ‘In the mood for a semantic theory’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91: 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). L’impératif russe. Mode de la rupture. Études de Linguistique Contrastive. (ed.). Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne: 149–164.Google Scholar
(2007). Causal reference and inverse scope as mixed quotation. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium. , and (eds.). Amsterdam: ILLC: 199–204.Google Scholar
(2010). Mood in Icelandic. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and . Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 31–55.Google Scholar
(1982). Comments on Clark and Carlson’s paper. Mutual Knowledge. (ed.). London: Academic Press: 46–51.Google Scholar
and (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1998). ‘Quantifier phrases, meaningfulness “in isolation”, and ellipsis’. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). In defense of non-sentential assertion. Semantics versus Pragmatics. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 383–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Neither fragments nor ellipsis. The Syntax of Nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives. , , and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). ‘Shorthand, syntactic ellipsis, and the pragmatic determinants of what is said’. Mind and Language 19: 442–471.Google Scholar
(2014). Talking about the future: unsettled truth and assertion. Future Times, Future Tenses. , and (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1964). ‘Intention and convention in speech acts’. Philosophical Review 73: 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012). A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative. With Special Reference to Japanese Imperatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2009). What use is what is said. Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. and (eds.). Bingley: Emerald: 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). Mood in German. Mood in the Languages of Europe. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998). ‘A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 30(6): 755–769.Google Scholar
(2006). L’impératif en bulgare. Études de linguistique contrastive. (ed.). Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne: 191–212.Google Scholar
(1986). Conditionals and speech acts. On Conditionals. , and (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). ‘Pragmatics in the last quarter century: the case of conditional perfection’. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). Imperative–hortative systems. The World Atlas of Language Structures. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 294–296.Google Scholar
and (2005a). The morphological imperative. The World Atlas of Language Structures. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 286–289.Google Scholar
and (2005b). The prohibitive. The World Atlas of Language Structures. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 290–293.Google Scholar
, ed. (2007). Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar: Studies in Honour of Frits Beukema. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Universal grammar and speech act theory. Essays in Speech Act Theory. and (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 25–62.Google Scholar
(2005). Success, satisfaction and truth in speech acts and formal semantics. Semantics: A Reader. and (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 710–734.Google Scholar
(1996). Data semantics and the pragmatics of indicative conditionals. On Conditionals. , , and (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 147–168.Google Scholar
(2005). ‘The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia’. Linguistic Typology 9: 223–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2012). ‘Imperative puzzles’. Slides for the paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium, Amherst.
(2002). ‘Is there a Spanish imperative intonation revisited: local consideration’. Linguistics 40: 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998–1999). Non-truth conditional semantics: Mood indicators I. UCL Linguistics Dept. lecture notes.
and (1988). Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. Human Agency, Language, Duty and Value: Philosophical Essays in Honour of J. O. Urmson. , and (eds.). Stanford: Stanford University Press: 77–101.Google Scholar
(2008). ‘Encoding the addressee in the syntax: evidence from English imperative subjects’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2012). ‘A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30: 1231–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). ‘Developments in the study of intonational typology’. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 874–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990). ‘The status of imperatives in theories of grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.
(2000). ‘Free choice disjunctions and epistemic possibility’. Natural Language Semantics 8: 255–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar