Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:57:08.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Reconsidering the Formal Structure of Traditional Game Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2019

Vernon L. Smith  and
Bart J. Wilson
Vernon L. Smith
Affiliation:
Chapman University, California
Bart J. Wilson
Affiliation:
Chapman University, California
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Humanomics
Moral Sentiments and the Wealth of Nations for the Twenty-First Century
 , pp. 161 - 171
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, Joyce, Dickhaut, John, and Kevin, McCabe. 1995. “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History,” Games and Economic Behavior 10: 122–42.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin F. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cherry, Todd L., Frykblom, Peter, and Shogren, Jason F.. 2002. “Hardnose the Dictator,” American Economic Review 92(4): 1218–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, James C. and Deck, Cary A.. 2005. “On the Nature of Reciprocal Motives,” Economic Inquiry 43, 623–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Armin, Fehr, Ernst, and Fischbacher, Urs. 2003. “On the Nature of Fair Behavior,” Economic Inquiry 41(1): 20–6.Google Scholar
Forsythe, Robert, Horowitz, Joel L., Savin, N. E., and Sefton, Martin. 1994. “Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments,” Games and Economic Behavior 6(3): 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, John, Pearce, David, and Stacchetti, Ennio. 1989. “Psychological Games and Sequential Rationality,” Games and Economic Behavior 1: 60–79.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin, Shachat, Keith, and Smith, Vernon L.. 1994. “Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Experiments,” Games and Economic Behavior 7(3): 346–80.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin and Smith, Vernon L.. 1996a. “Social Distance and Other Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games,” American Economic Review 86(3): 653–660.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin and Smith, Vernon L.. 1996b. “On Expectations and Monetary Stakes in Ultimatum Games,” International Journal of Game Theory 25 (3): 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, Kevin, Rigdon, Mary L., and Smith, Vernon L.. 2003. “Positive Reciprocity and Intentions in Trust Games,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52(2): 267–75.Google Scholar
Meardon, Stephen J. and Ortmann, Andreas. 1996. “Self-Command in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments: A Game-Theoretic Reinterpretation,” Rationality and Society 8(1): 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxoby, Robert J. and Spraggon, John. 2008. “Mine and Yours: Property Rights in Dictator Games,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 65(3–4): 703–13.Google Scholar
Rabin, Matthew. 1993. “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics,” American Economic Review 83(5): 1281–1302.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1853 [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments; or, An Essay towards an Analysis of the Principles by which Men naturally judge concerning the Conduct and Character, first of their Neighbours, and afterwards of themselves. To which is added, A Dissertation on the Origins of Languages. New Edition. With a biographical and critical Memoir of the Author, by Stewart, Dugald. London, UK: Henry G. Bohn. Available online and in electronic formats at http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2620.Google Scholar
Sobel, Joel. 2005. “Interdependent Preferences and Reciprocity,” Journal of Economic Literature 93: 392–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, Matthias and Kocher, Martin G.. 2007. “Trust and Trustworthiness across Different Age Groups,” Games and Economic Behavior 59: 364–82.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×