The implications of humanism for business studies

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808395.008

6 - The implications of humanism for business studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2011

Omar Aktouf and

Edited by

Shiban Khan and

Heiko Spitzeck: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Michael Pirson: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wolfgang Amann: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Shiban Khan: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Ernst von Kimakowitz: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Adopting a humanistic approach within business activities and interactions is of the utmost priority if society and, by extension, we as human beings both in the individual and collective sense are to survive, flourish, and emancipate ourselves.

At first glance, mainstream management literature would appear to be showing encouraging signs of enlightenment across the myriad of leitmotivs that are discerned across such words as “humanism,” “ethics,” “corporate governance,” “social responsibility for business,” and “environmental responsibility.” In fact, if there is a major point of convergence for the many streams of literature, it is the importance of the human person or personal attitudes and behaviors at work. No matter the trend or topic: whether it is about corporate ‘culturalism’ (Deal and Kennedy 1982; Ouchi 1981; Peters and Waterman 1982; Schein 1985 and 1991) or motivation and the valorization of human resources (Archier and Serieyx 1987; Crozier 1989; Peters and Austin 1985; Waterman 1987); whether it is across total quality, the re-introduction of the meaning of work, “empowerment” (Juran and Gryna 1980; Michel 1989; Mintzberg 1989; Peters and Austin 1985; Serieyx 1989) or the realization of the workplace as an area of social interactions and sharing (DePree 1989; Peters 1987; Peters and Austin 1985; Weitzman 1984); or whether it is the various preoccupations with ethics, ethico-spirituality, or other management methods aiming towards cohesion, participation, initiative and creativity at all levels, what stands out most clearly is the insistent call from all quarters to put the human element at the forefront.

Type: Chapter
Information: Humanism in Business , pp. 101 - 122

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agayo, R. 1991. Dr. Deming: The American Who Taught the Japanese about Quality. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Albert, M. 1992. Capitalism against Capitalism. London: Whurr Publishing.Google Scholar

Archier, G. and Serieyx, H. 1987. The Type 3 Company. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Atlan, H. 1972. “Du bruit comme principe d'auto-organisation,” Communications 18: 21–37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Atlan, H. 1985. “Ordre et désordre dans les systèmes naturels,” in Chanlat, A. and Dufour, M. (eds.), La Rupture entre l'entreprise et les hommes. Paris: Les Editions d'organisation, pp. 119–37.Google Scholar

Baechler, J. 1995. Le capitalisme, vol. I, Les origines. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Besançon, A. 1974. L'histoire psychanalytique. Une anthologie. Paris: Mouton.CrossRef Google Scholar

Beynon, H. 1973. Working for Ford. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Caillé, A. 1989. Critique de la raison utilitaire, manifeste du MAUSS. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Chanlat, A. and Bédard, R. 1990. “La gestion, une affaire de parole,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar

Chanlat, A. and Dufour, M. 1985. La rupture entre l'entreprise et les hommes. Montreal: Quebec-Amérique.Google Scholar

Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.). 1990. L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.

Chossudovsky, M. 2003. The Globalization of Poverty (second edition). Oro, ON: Global Outlook.Google Scholar

Clegg, S. R. 1975. Power, Myth And Domination. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Clegg, S. R. 1990. “Pouvoir symbolique, langage et organization,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 663–81.Google Scholar

Crozier, M. 1989. L'entreprise à l'écoute. Paris: InterEditions.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. 1995. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon.Google Scholar

Deal, T. E. and Kennedy, A. 1982. Corporate Culture: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. 1980. Le travail, usure mentale. Paris: Le Centurion.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. 1990. “Nouveau regard sur la souffrance humaine dans les organizations,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 687–708.Google Scholar

Dejours, C. 1998. Souffrance en France. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT CAES.Google Scholar

DePree, M. 1989. Leadership Is an Art. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Deveureux, G. 1973. Essais d'ethno-psychiatrie générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. 1993. Childhood and Society. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Etchegoyen, A. 1990. Les entreprises ont-elles une âme?Paris: Francois Bourrin.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. 1989. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Evans-Pritchard, E. 1950. Social Anthropology. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar

Fromm, E. 1961. Marx's Concept of Man. New York: Frederick Ungar.Google Scholar

Galbraith, J. K. 1987. Economics in Perspective. A Critical History. Boston: Hougton Miflin.Google Scholar

Gasparini, G. 1990. “Temps et Travail en Occident,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar

Girin, J. 1982. “Langage en actes et organizations,” Économie et Societé: The ISMEA Proceedings on Management Sciences 3(16): 1559–91.Google Scholar

Girin, J. 1990. “Problèmes de langage dans les organizations,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 37–78.Google Scholar

Godelier, M. 1974. Rationality and Irrationality in Economics. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Hassard, J. 1988. Time, Work and Organization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hassard, J. 1990. “Pour un paradigme ethnographique du temps de travail,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 215–30.Google Scholar

Herzberg, F. 1980. “Humanities: Practical Management Education,” Industry Week 206(7): 69–72.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. 1997. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kamdem, E. 1990. “Temps et travail en Afrique,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 231–55.Google Scholar

Kets de Vries, M. and Miller, D. 1984. The Neurotic Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kołakowski, L. 1987. Histoire du Marxisme, vol. I. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Laplantine, F. 1973. Ethnopsychiatrie générale. Paris: Psychothèque.Google Scholar

Levy, J.-P. 1997. La fabrique de l'Homme. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Liker, J. K. 2004. The Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. 1964. One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. 1969. “Toward Humanistic Biology,” American Psychologist 24: 724–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maturana, H. 1992. Tree of Knowledge. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar

Michel, S. 1989. Peut-on gérer les motivations?Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. 1989. Inside Our Strange World of Organisations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. 2005. Managers not MBA's: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar

Mitroff, I. and Pauchant, T. 1990. We're So Big and Powerful Nothing Bad Can Happen to Us. New York: Birch Lane Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, G. 1986. Images of Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Monthoux, P. 1989. “The Moral Philosophy of Management.” Unpublished manuscript, Stockholm University.

Morgan, G. 1986. Images of Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Morin, E. 1993. Terre-patrie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Olive, D. 1987. Just Rewards: The Case of Ethical Reform in Business. Toronto: Key Porter Books.Google Scholar

Orgogozo, I. and Serieyx, H. 1989. Changer le Changement. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Ouchi, W. G. 1981. Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Packard, V. 1989. The Ultra Rich: How Much Is Too Much?London: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Pages, M., Bonetti, V., and Gaulejac, V. 1984. L'emprise de l'organisation (third edition). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Pascale, R. 1990. Managing on the Edge. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Pascale, R. 1996. “Reflections on Honda,” California Management Review 38(4): 112–17.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. 1979. “Organizational Theory in a Society of Organizations.” Paper presented at the symposium “L'administration publique: Perspectives d'avenir Public,” Quebec, May.

Peters, T. and Waterman, R. 1982. In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Peters, T. 1987. Thriving on Chaos. San Francisco: Knopf.Google Scholar

Peters, T. and Austin, N. 1985. A Passion of Excellence. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, R. 1979. Working for Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rifkin, J. 1980. The Entropy Law: A New World View. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Rosaldo, R. 1989. “Subjectivity in Social Analysis,” in Culture and Truth. The Remaking of Social Analysis, Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 168–195.Google Scholar

Sainsaulieu, R. 1983. “La regulation culturelle des ensembles organisms,” L'année sociologique 33: 195–217.Google Scholar

Sainsaulieu, R. 1987. “Développement social et création institutionnelle en enterprise,” in Desjeux, D. (ed.), Organisation et management en question(s). Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 203–21.Google Scholar

Sartre, J.-P. 1948. Existentialism and Humanism. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Sartre, J.-P. 1966. Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar

Sartre, J.-P. 1976. Critique of Dialectical Reason, vol. I. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar

Schein, E. 1991. “The Role of the Founder in the Creation of Organizational Culture,” in Frost, P., Moore, L., Louise, M., Lundberg, C., and Martin, J. (eds.), Reframing Organizational Culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar

Schein, E. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Serieyx, H. 1989. Le zéro mépris. Paris: InterEditions.Google Scholar

Sievers, B. 1994. Work, Life and Death Itself. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Sievers, B. 1986a. “Beyond the Surrogate of Motivation,” Organization Studies 7: 335–51.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sievers, B. 1986b. “Participation as a Collusive Quarrel over Immortality,” The Journal of SCOS 1(1): 72–82.Google Scholar

Solomon, R. C. and Hanson, K. R. 1985. It's Good Business. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar

Terkel, D. 1972. Working. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar

Turner, B. A. (ed.). 1990. Organizational Symbolism. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRef

Varela, F. J. 1980. Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: Elsevier North Holland.Google Scholar

Villette, M. 1988. L'homme qui Croyait au Management. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Vincent, J. C. 1990. Des Systèmes et des Hommes. Paris: Les Editions d'organisation.Google Scholar

Waterman, R. 1987. The Renewal Factor. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar

Weitzman, M. 1984. The Share Economy: Conquering Stagflation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar