Book contents
- Holding Out
- Cambridge Military Histories
- Holding Out
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Comparative Ranks
- Chronology
- Abbreviations
- General key to maps
- Introduction
- 1 Context
- 2 Principles
- 3 Organisation
- 4 Personality
- 5 Intelligence
- 6 Communication
- 7 Learning
- 8 Performance
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Holding Out
- Cambridge Military Histories
- Holding Out
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Comparative Ranks
- Chronology
- Abbreviations
- General key to maps
- Introduction
- 1 Context
- 2 Principles
- 3 Organisation
- 4 Personality
- 5 Intelligence
- 6 Communication
- 7 Learning
- 8 Performance
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Despite the Western Front’s reputation for stagnation, the armies there strove for tactical, technological and organisational advantage. Learning was the fourth command task, and the chapter describes both how and what the German army learned about combined arms battle, the key to tactical success. By mid-1916, it had fallen behind the enemy. Evolution of doctrine to remedy this, resistance to it and measures to overcome the resistance. Case study on converting the doctrine into reality by training of command teams and formations.
Analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of German combined arms performance in the spring fighting. Different lessons learned and OHL’s more directive approach when updating doctrine to prevent chaos. Positive reputation of the doctrine but important tactical defects persisted. Strong evidence from this period both for and against the German army as a learning organisation: this ambivalence an important cause of uneven success converting learning into improved performance.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Holding OutThe German Army and Operational Command in 1917, pp. 215 - 244Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023