Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Contributors
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction: The Making of the Protestant Succession
- 1 The Political Consequences of the Cuckoldy German Turnip Farmer
- 2 ‘They May Well Bear the Same Name’: The Revolution and the Succession in the Election of 1715
- 3 The Backlash Against Anglican Catholicity, 1709–18
- 4 ‘The End of the Beginning?’ The Rhetorics of Revolutions in the Political Sermons of 1688–1716
- 5 Security, Stability and Credit: The Hanoverian Succession and the Politics of the Financial Revolution
- 6 Colonial Policy in North America, 1689–1717
- 7 Securing the Union and the Hanoverian Succession in Scotland, 1707–37
- 8 Patriotism after the Hanoverian Succession
- 9 Displaced but Not Replaced: The Continuation of Dutch Intellectual Influences in Early Hanoverian Britain
- 10 Some Hidden Thunder: Hanover, Saxony and the Management of Political Union, 1697–1763
- Index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
7 - Securing the Union and the Hanoverian Succession in Scotland, 1707–37
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2020
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Contributors
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction: The Making of the Protestant Succession
- 1 The Political Consequences of the Cuckoldy German Turnip Farmer
- 2 ‘They May Well Bear the Same Name’: The Revolution and the Succession in the Election of 1715
- 3 The Backlash Against Anglican Catholicity, 1709–18
- 4 ‘The End of the Beginning?’ The Rhetorics of Revolutions in the Political Sermons of 1688–1716
- 5 Security, Stability and Credit: The Hanoverian Succession and the Politics of the Financial Revolution
- 6 Colonial Policy in North America, 1689–1717
- 7 Securing the Union and the Hanoverian Succession in Scotland, 1707–37
- 8 Patriotism after the Hanoverian Succession
- 9 Displaced but Not Replaced: The Continuation of Dutch Intellectual Influences in Early Hanoverian Britain
- 10 Some Hidden Thunder: Hanover, Saxony and the Management of Political Union, 1697–1763
- Index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
Summary
The Hanoverian Succession did not have a uniform British impact. From an Anglocentric perspective, it consolidated the bipartisan Revolution of 1688–89 that was reaffirmed by the extension of the English state to include Scotland in 1707. The immediate impact of the Hanoverian Succession was to promote the Whig supremacy in Britain and Empire, albeit this was not fully secured until the defeat of the Jacobite rising of 1715–16. From a Scottish perspective, the Revolution of 1689–91 was an exclusive Whig achievement, uncompromised by any accommodation with the Tories. James VII was deposed in Scotland, whereas he was deemed, as James II, to have abdicated in England. Certainly, Whig interests at the Revolution in Scotland spilled over into the Union of 1707. However, there was no predetermined path from Revolution to Union. The English parliament rejected union with Scotland in 1689 and again in 1703, as also with Ireland in 1703, 1707 and 1709. The Irish parliament was subordinated to the British by the Declaratory Act of 1720.
Union with Scotland was driven on from 1705 by the English ministry. In part, this was because of the perceived threat of invasion from France through Scotland in the course of the War of the Spanish Succession. More pertinent were issues of political economy. The English state, during first the Nine Years War of 1688–97 and, subsequently, during the War of the Spanish Succession, had become increasingly disconcerted by the rogue behaviour of Scottish commercial networks as major interlopers in the colonial trade to the Americas. These networks circumvented the English Navigation Acts through tramptrading, a practice the Scots had exported from the Baltic to the Caribbean, through counterfeiting of shipping documentation and through the judicial packing of colonial courts, particularly in the Delaware. Networks operated not only from Scottish and colonial ports but through commercial hubs based in Rotterdam, Amsterdam and Hamburg as well as London. The Union was specifically designed to bring these networks under control.
The Union did not close the door to foreign backing for Scottish Jacobitism which was offered variously from France, Spain, Sweden, Russia and the papacy before and after the Hanoverian Succession.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Hanoverian Succession in Great Britain and its Empire , pp. 136 - 154Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2019